Drugs for hypertension

American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guidelines for treatment of hypertension were last published in 2018.1 Treatment of hypertensive urgencies and emergencies is not discussed here.

Effects of Trandolapril on Structural, Contractile and Electrophysiological Remodeling in Experimental Volume Overload Heart Failure

Chronic volume overload induces multiple cardiac remodeling processes that finally result in eccentric cardiac hypertrophy and heart failure. We have hypothesized that chronic angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition by trandolapril might affect various remodeling processes differentially, thus allowing their dissociation. Cardiac remodeling due to chronic volume overload and the effects of trandolapril were investigated in rats with an aortocaval fistula (ACF rats). The aortocaval shunt was created using a needle technique and progression of cardiac remodeling to heart failure was followed for 24 weeks. In ACF rats, pronounced eccentric cardiac hypertrophy and contractile and proarrhythmic electrical remodeling were associated with increased mortality. Trandolapril substantially reduced the electrical proarrhythmic remodeling and mortality, whereas the effect on cardiac hypertrophy was less pronounced and significant eccentric hypertrophy was preserved. Effective suppression of electrical proarrhythmic remodeling and mortality but not hypertrophy indicates that the beneficial therapeutic effects of ACE inhibitor trandolapril in volume overload heart failure might be dissociated from pure antihypertrophic effects.

Renoprotection Provided by Additional Diuretic Treatment in Partially Nephrectomized Ren-2 Transgenic Rats Subjected to the Combined RAS and ETA Blockade

Objective

Our previous study in heterozygous Ren-2 transgenic rats (TGR) demonstrated that long-term treatment with endothelin receptor A (ET_A) blocker atrasentan added to the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockade had renoprotective effects in a model of chronic kidney disease (CKD) induced by partial nephrectomy. Since ET_A blockade is known to cause edema, we were interested whether diuretic treatment added to this therapy would be beneficial.

Design and Methods

Partial nephrectomy (NX) was performed at the age of 3 months in TGR rats which were subjected to: (i) RAS blockade alone (angiotensin receptor blocker losartan and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor trandolapril), (ii) combined RAS (losartan and trandolapril) and ET_A receptor blockade (atrasentan), or (iii) diuretic (hydrochlorothiazide) added to the combined RAS + ET_A blockade for 50 weeks following NX.

Results

At the end of the study systolic blood pressure and cardiac hypertrophy were similarly decreased in all treated groups. Survival was significantly improved by ET_A receptor blockade added to RAS blockade with no further effects of diuretic treatment. However, additional diuretic treatment combined with RAS + ET_A blockade decreased body weight and had beneficial renoprotective effects - reductions of both kidney weight and kidney damage markers. Proteinuria gradually increased in rats treated with RAS blockade alone, while it was substantially lowered by additional ET_A blockade. In rats treated with additional diuretic, proteinuria was progressively reduced throughout the experiment.

Conclusion

A diuretic added to the combined RAS and ET_A blockade has late renoprotective effects in CKD induced by partial nephrectomy in Ren-2 transgenic rats. The diuretic improved: renal function (evaluated as proteinuria and creatinine clearance), renal morphology (kidney mass, glomerular volume), and histological markers of kidney damage (glomerulosclerosis index, tubulointerstitial injury).

Effects of verapamil slow release plus trandolapril combination therapy on essential hypertension

BACKGROUND

Fixed-dose combination antihypertensive therapy has been recommended for patients with essential hypertension who are unresponsive to monotherapy or as a first-line treatment.

OBJECTIVE

We investigated the effects of a fixed-dose combination of the phenylalkylamine-type calcium channel blocker verapamil slow release (SR)plus the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor trandolapril on blood pressure (BP), serum lipid profile, urinary albumin excretion (UAE), left ventricular mass (LVM), and LVM index (LVMI), as well as the adverse events associated with this treatment.

METHODS

Patients aged 30 to 65 years with mild to moderate essential hypertension were included in the study. All of the patients received capsules containing combination treatment with verapamil SR 180 mg plus trandolapril 2 mg orally, daily for 12 weeks. Mean arterial pressure (MAP), systolic BP (SBP), diastolic BP (DBP), and heart rate (HR) were measured at baseline and at 4, 8, and 12 weeks of treatment. Serum lipid profile, UAE, LVM, LVMI, and body mass index (BMI) were determined at baseline and at the end of the study period. All patients underwent electrocardiography and echocardiography at baseline and week 12. The primary end point of the study was to achieve an SBP/DBP ≤140/≤90 mm Hg (ie, normotensive) during week 12. All adverse events were assessed as mild, moderate, or severe at each visit. According to the response rate at week 12, patients were divided into 2 groups: those who became normotensive (responders) or those who remained hypertensive (SBP/DBP >140/>90 mm Hg; nonresponders).

RESULTS

Forty-one patients (29 women, 12 men; mean [SD] age, 47.7 [7.8] years; mean [SD] BMI, 29.4 [3.5] kg/m(2)) were enrolled. The median durationof hypertension prior to enrollment was 5 months. Mean MAP, SBP, DBP, UAE, total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), LDL-C/highdensity lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) ratio, LVM, LVMI, and BMI decreased significantly after 12 weeks of combination treatment; HR and triglyceride level did not change significantly. Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 31.7% of patients, and none were severe or caused any patient to withdraw from the study. The most common adverse events were cough, constipation, headache, and dryness in the throat. Microalbuminuria, which may be a marker of endothelial dysfunction, was found in 7 (17.1%) patients at baseline and regressed significantly after 12 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study population, the fixed-dose combination of verapamil-trandolapril was an effective and well-tolerated antihypertensive therapy. This combination significantly reduced MAP, BP, TC, LDL-C, LDL-C/HDL-C ratio, UAE, LVM, and LVMI. Also, microalbuminuria decreased after this treatment. Verapamil-trandolapril may be useful in preventing microalbuminuria and left ventricular hypertrophy in patients with essential hypertension.

Update on the use of trandolapril in the management of cardiovascular disorders

Trandolapril is a well known angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor with many cardiovascular (CV) indications. The objectives of this article are to review the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics properties of trandolapril and to focus on its clinical relevance in cardiovascular medicine. Various populations have been studied in large clinical trials including patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) after an acute myocardial infarction (AMI), diabetics, patients with hypertension (HTN), stable coronary artery disease (CAD) and prevention of proteinuria. Long-term treatment with trandolapril in patients with reduced left ventricular function soon after AMI significantly reduced the risk of overall mortality, mortality from CV causes, sudden death, and the development of severe CHF. Treatment with trandolapril after AMI complicated by left ventricular dysfunction appears to be of considerable importance in patients with diabetes mellitus by saving lives and substantially reducing the risk of progression to severe CHF as well. Moreover, trandolapril reduces progression to proteinuria in high-risk patients. Some of the advantages of trandolapril over other ACE inhibitors are the wide spectrum of patient populations studied, the well established dosage and its proven trough-to-peak effect ratios permitting a safe once-a-day administration.

Trandolapril/verapamil combination in hypertensive diabetic patients

Cardiovascular diseases are directly affected by arterial hypertension. When associated with diabetes mellitus, the potential deleterious effects are well amplified. Both conditions play a central role in the pathogenesis of coronary artery disease, heart failure, stroke, and renal insufficiency. Prevalence of hypertension is much higher among diabetic than non-diabetic patients, and the hypertensive patient is more likely to develop type 2 diabetes. Current international guidelines recommend aggressive reductions in blood pressure (BP) in hypertensive patients with additional risk factors, including cardiovascular risk factors, and emphasize the relevance of intensive reduction in patients with diabetes mellitus; a goal of 130/80 mm Hg is required. To achieve BP target a combination of antihypertensives will be needed, and the use of long-acting drugs that are able to provide 24-hour efficacy with a once-daily dosing confers the noteworthy advantages of compliance improvement and BP variation lessening. Lower dosages of the individual treatments of the combination therapy can be administered for the same antihypertensive efficiency as that attained with high dosages of monotherapy. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and calcium-channel blockers as a combination have theoretically compelling advantages for vessel homeostasis. Trandolapril/verapamil sustained release combination has showed beneficial effects on cardiac and renal systems as well as its antihypertensive efficacy, with no metabolic disturbances. This combination can be considered as an effective therapy for the diabetic hypertensive population.

Managing hypertension in diabetic patients--focus on trandolapril/verapamil combination

Hypertensive diabetes individuals are at higher risk for cardiovascular events and progression to end stage renal disease. Several well conducted clinical trials indicate that aggressive treatment of hypertension in individual with diabetes reduces these complications. Combinations of two or more antihypertensive drugs are frequently required to reach the target blood pressure and to improve the cardiovascular and renal outcomes in these patients. There are physiological and clinical rationales for renin-angiotensin system blockade in hypertensive diabetics. Trandolapril/verapamil sustained released (SR) is a fixed-dose combination of trandolapril and a sustained release formulation of verapamil and indicated in treatment of hypertension in patients who require more than one drug to reach target blood pressure. The antihypertensive efficacy of trandolapril/verapamil SR has been evaluated extensively in large trials. In the INVEST trial, a verapamil SR-based treatment strategy that included trandolapril in most patients was effective in reducing the primary outcome in hypertensive patients with coronary artery disease. The new onset of diabetes was also significantly lower in the verapamil SR/trandolapril treatment group in comparison with those on the atenolol/hydroclorothiazide treatment group. The BErgamo NEphrologic Diabetes Complications Trial (BENEDICT) documented that in hypertensive diabetes and normoalbuminuria, trandolapril plus verapamil or trandolapril alone delayed the onset of microalbuminuria independent of their blood pressure-reducing effect. Thus, trandolapril/verapamil is an effective option for treatment of hypertensive diabetes patients requiring more than one agent to achieve target blood pressure.

Effects of ACE inhibition and angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockade on cardiac function and G proteins in rats with chronic heart failure

1. Inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) improves symptoms and prognosis in heart failure. The experimental basis for these benefits remains unclear. We examined the effects of inhibition of ACE or blockade of angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor on the haemodynamics, cardiac G-proteins, and collagen synthesis of rats with coronary artery ligation (CAL), a model in which chronic heart failure (CHF) is induced. 2. Rats were orally treated with the ACE inhibitor trandolapril (3 mg kg(-1) day(-1)) or the AT1 receptor blocker L-158809 (1 mg kg(-1) day(-1)) from the 2nd to 8th week after CAL. CAL resulted in decreases in the left ventricular systolic pressure and its positive and negative dP/dt, an increase in the left ventricular end-diastolic pressure, and the rightward shift of the left ventricular pressure-volume curve. Long-term treatment with either drug improved these signs of CHF to a similar degree. 3. Cardiac Gsalpha and Gqalpha protein levels decreased, whereas the level of Gialpha protein increased in the animals with CHF. Long-term treatment with trandolapril or L-158809 attenuated the increase in the level of cardiac Gialpha protein of the animals with CHF without affecting Gsalpha and Gqalpha protein levels. Cardiac collagen content of the failing heart increased, whose increase was blocked by treatment with either drug. 4. Exogenous angiotensin I stimulated collagen synthesis in cultured cardiac fibroblasts, whose stimulation was attenuated by either drug. 5. These results suggest that blockade of the RAS, at either the receptor level or the synthetic enzyme level, may attenuate the cardiac fibrosis that occurs after CAL and thus affect the remodelling of the failing heart.

Role of bradykinin and eNOS in the anti-ischaemic effect of trandolapril

1. Angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors are under study in ischaemic heart diseases, their mechanism of action being still unknown. 2. The anti-ischaemic effect of trandolapril and the possible involvement of a bradykinin-modulation on endothelial constitutive nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) in exerting this effect, were investigated. 3. Three doses of trandolapril, chronically administered in vivo, were studied in isolated perfused rat hearts subjected to global ischaemia followed by reperfusion. 4. Trandolapril has an anti-ischaemic effect. The dose of 0.3 mg kg(-1) exerted the best effect reducing diastolic pressure increase during ischaemia (from 33.0+/-4.5 to 14.0+/-5.2 mmHg; P<0.05 vs control) and reperfusion (from 86.1+/-9.4 to 22.2+/-4.1 mmHg; P<0.01 vs control), improving functional recovery, counteracting creatine phosphokinase release and ameliorating energy metabolism after reperfusion. 5. Trandolapril down-regulated the baseline developed pressure. 6. Trandolapril increased myocardial bradykinin content (from 31.8+/-6.1 to 54.8+/-7.5 fmol/gww; P<0.05, at baseline) and eNOS expression and activity in aortic endothelium (both P<0.01 vs control) and in cardiac myocytes (from 11.3+/-1.5 to 17.0+/-2.0 mUOD microg protein(-1) and from 0.62+/-0.05 to 0.80+/-0.06 pmol mg prot(-1) min(-1); both P<0.05 vs control). 7. HOE 140 (a bradykinin B(2) receptor antagonist) and NOS inhibitors counteracted the above-reported effects. 8. There was a negative correlation between myocyte's eNOS up-regulation and myocardial contraction down-regulation. 9. Our findings suggest that the down-regulation exerted by trandolapril on baseline cardiac contractility, through a bradykinin-mediated increase in NO production, plays a crucial role in the anti-ischaemic effect of trandolapril by reducing energy breakdown during ischaemia.

Verapamil SR and trandolapril combination therapy in hypertension--a clinical trial of factorial design. German Hypertension Study Group

AIMS

To investigate the dose-response relationship and contribution of verapamil SR and trandolapril given in combination once a day for the treatment of essential hypertension.

METHODS

A randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled, factorial, 12 arm parallel group comparison with placebo, verapamil SR (120, 180 mg), trandolapril (0.5, 1.0, 2.0 mg) covering all combinations of both drugs. A 4 week placebo run-in period followed by 6 weeks of treatment. Four hundred and fifty-six patients from office practice (22 centres) with mild to moderate hypertension enrolled and 426 with diastolic pressure > or = 100 mm Hg at the end of run-in period were randomized. Main outcome measures were reduction in sitting systolic (SBP) and sitting diastolic (DBP) blood pressure.

RESULTS

The combination of verapamil SR and trandolapril, particularly verapamil SR 180 mg and trandolapril 0.5 or 1.0 mg was significantly superior to both monocomponents at the same dose (P<0.05). For these combinations, the adjusted mean reductions in DBP from baseline to last visit were 14.1 and 16.0 mm Hg, respectively. Response surface analysis provided further evidence that these combinations were optimal for antihypertensive efficacy. All treatments were well tolerated. The incidence of adverse events did not differ significantly between treatment groups; the profile of adverse events on combination therapy was mild and consistent with that of each monocomponent.

CONCLUSIONS

All dosage combinations of verapamil SR and trandolapril produced significantly greater reduction of blood pressure than the monotherapy at the same dosage. However, verapamil SR 180 mg in combination with trandolapril 1.0 mg was the dosage with the greatest blood pressure reduction and had the greatest effects compared with the monocomponents.

The effect of chronic treatment with trandolapril on cyclic AMP-and cyclic GMP-dependent relaxations in aortic segments of rats with chronic heart failure

1 Characteristics of cyclic GMP- and cyclic AMP-mediated relaxation in aortic segments of rats with chronic heart failure (CHF) and the effects of chronic treatment with an angiotensin I converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, trandolapril, were examined 8 weeks after coronary artery ligation. 2 Cardiac output indices of coronary artery-ligated and sham-operated rats were 125+/-8 and 189+/-10 ml min(-1) kg(-1), respectively (P<0.05), indicating the development of CHF at this period. 3 The maximal relaxant response of aortic segments to 10 microM acetylcholine in rats with CHF and sham-operated rats was 64.0+/-5.7 and 86.9+/-1.9%, respectively (P<0.05), whereas the relaxant response to sodium nitroprusside (SNP) remained unchanged. Tissue cyclic GMP content in rats with CHF was lower than that of sham-operated rats. 4 In endothelium-intact segments of rats with CHF, the maximal relaxant response to 10 microM isoprenaline (44.5+/-6.7%) was lower that sham-operated rats (81.3+/-2.5%, P<0.05) and the concentration-response curve for NKH477, a water-soluble forskolin, was shifted to the right without a reduction in the maximal response. Isoprenaline-induced relaxation of aortic segments was attenuated by NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) in sham-operated rats, but not in rats with CHF. Relaxation to 30 microM dibutyryl cyclic AMP in rats with CHF (26.8+/-2.7%) was lower than that in sham-operated rats (63.4+/-11.8%, P<0.05). 5 Trandolapril (3 mg kg(-1) day(-1)) was orally administered from the 2nd to 8th week after the operation. Aortic blood flow of rats with CHF (38.5+/-3.6 ml min(-1)) was lower than that of sham-operated rats (55.0+/-3.0 ml min(-1)), and this reduction was reversed (54.1+/-3.4 ml min(-1)) by treatment with trandolapril. The diminished responsiveness described above was normalized in the trandolapril-treated rat with CHF (i.e., the maximal relaxation to acetylcholine, 94.7+/-1.0%; that to isoprenaline, 80.5+/-2.8%; that to dibutyryl cyclic AMP, 54.7+/-6.2%). However, aortic segments of trandolapril-treated rats with CHF, L-NAME did not attenuate isoprenaline-induced relaxation and the tissue cyclic GMP level was not fully restored, suggesting that the ability of the endothelium to produce NO was still partially damaged. 6 The results suggest that vasorelaxation in CHF, diminished mainly due to dysfunction in endothelial nitric oxide (NO) production and cyclic AMP-mediated signal transduction, was partially restored by long-term treatment with trandolapril. The mechanism underlying the restoration may be attributed in part to prevention of CHF-induced endothelial dysfunction.

Effects of long-term treatment with trandolapril on sarcoplasmic reticulum function of cardiac muscle in rats with chronic heart failure following myocardial infarction

1 Calcium transport activity of isolated cardiac sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) including Ca2+ uptake and release is decreased in animals with chronic heart failure (CHF) following myocardial infarction. The present study was undertaken to determine whether an angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, trandolapril, improves cardiac sarcoplasmic reticular function in animals with CHF following myocardial infarction. 2 CHF was induced by left coronary artery ligation in rats, which resulted in an infarction of approximately 45% of the left ventricle. Aortic flow and cardiac output index were decreased, and left ventricular end-diastolic pressure was increased 8 weeks after the operation, suggesting the development of CHF. 3 The developed force transients of cardiac skinned fibres of the rats with CHF were decreased when the skinned fibre was preloaded for 0.25-1 min with 10(-5) M Ca2+ (48-88%) and when preloaded with 10(-6) M Ca2+ and then exposed to 0.1-1 mM caffeine (45-93%). 4 The [3H]-ryanodine-binding activity in SR-enriched fractions was reduced by 23% in the CHF group. These results suggest that the amount of Ca2+ released from SR is decreased due to a reduced rate of SR Ca2+ uptake and a downregulation of the SR Ca2+-release channel. 5 Rats were treated orally with 3 mg kg(-1) day(-1) trandolapril from the 2nd to the 8th week after the coronary artery ligation. Treatment with trandolapril attenuated the reduction in aortic flow and cardiac output index and the increase in left ventricular end-diastolic pressure, and improved the developed force transients of the skinned fibre of the animal with CHF without causing a reduction of infarct size. Treatment with trandolapril also attenuated the reduction in ryanodine receptor density in the viable left ventricle of the rat with CHF. 6 It is concluded that long-term treatment with trandolapril attenuates cardiac SR dysfunction in rats with CHF and that the mechanism underlying this effect is, at least in part, attributed to prevention of downregulation of Ca2+ release channel.

Do trandolapril and indomethacin influence renal function and renal functional reserve in hypertensive patients?

AIMS

To assess the effect of trandolapril (2 mg once daily) and indomethacin (25 mg three times daily), alone and in combination, on renal function and renal functional reserve in hypertensive patients (DBP 95-115 mmHg) requiring regular non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs).

METHODS

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, four way crossover design. After 3 weeks treatment renal plasma flow (RPF) and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) were measured using the p-aminohippurate (PAH) and inulin methods. Renal functional reserve was estimated by measuring RPF and GFR at the end of an intravenous infusion of dopamine 2 microg kg(-1) and 10% amino acid solution.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in RPF between treatments: -22.79 ml min(-1) (95% CI -54.82, 9.24) for placebo and trandolapril, -10.37 ml min(-1) (95% CI -30.7, 9.96) for placebo and indomethacin, -14.78 ml min(-1) (95% CI -50.33, 20.77) for placebo and trandolapril with indomethacin. There was no significant difference in functional reserve RPF between treatments: -34.96 ml min(-1) (95% CI -119.8, 49.88) for placebo and trandolapril, 29.78 ml min(-1), -15.18, 74.74) for placebo and indomethacin, and -25.84 ml min(-1) (95% CI -87.62, 35.94) for placebo and trandolapril with indomethacin. There was no significant difference in GFR between treatments: -1.01 ml min(-1) (95% CI -7.45, 5.42) for placebo and trandolapril, -7.88 ml min(-1) (95% CI -15.08, -0.68) for placebo and indomethacin, and -0.36 ml min(-1) (95% CI -7.58, 6.86) for placebo and trandolapril with indomethacin. There was no significant difference in functional reserve GFR between treatments: 5.13 ml min(-1) (95% CI -4.97, 15.23) for placebo and trandolapril, 6.31 ml min(-1) (95% CI -1.88, 14.5) for placebo and indomethacin, 7.21 ml min(-1) (95% CI 1.26, 13.16) for placebo and trandolapril with indomethacin.

CONCLUSION

In hypertensives chronic treatment with NSAIDs or ACEI alone or in combination did not change RPF or GFR and did not change renal functional reserve capacity of RPF or GFR.