1
|
Lebow ES, Shaverdian N, Eichholz JE, Kratochvil LB, McCune M, Murciano-Goroff YR, Jee J, Eng J, Chaft JE, Kris MG, Kalashnikova E, Feeney J, Scalise CB, Sudhaman S, Palsuledesai CC, Malhotra M, Krainock M, Sethi H, Aleshin A, Liu MC, Shepherd AF, Wu AJ, Simone CB, Gelblum DY, Johnson KA, Rudin CM, Gomez DR, Razavi P, Reis-Filho JS, Isbell JM, Li BT, Rimner A. ctDNA-based detection of molecular residual disease in stage I-III non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with definitive radiotherapy. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1253629. [PMID: 37795442 PMCID: PMC10546425 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1253629] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2023] [Accepted: 08/24/2023] [Indexed: 10/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Sensitive and reliable biomarkers for early detection of recurrence are needed to improve post-definitive radiation risk stratification, disease management, and outcomes for patients with unresectable early-stage or locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who are treated with definitive radiation therapy (RT). This prospective, multistate single-center, cohort study investigated the association of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) status with recurrence in patients with unresectable stage I-III NSCLC who underwent definitive RT. Methods A total of 70 serial plasma samples from 17 NSCLC patients were collected before, during, and after treatment. A personalized, tumor-informed ctDNA assay was used to track a set of up to 16 somatic, single nucleotide variants in the associated patient's plasma samples. Results Pre-treatment ctDNA detection rate was 82% (14/17) and varied based on histology and stage. ctDNA was detected in 35% (6/17) of patients at the first post-RT timepoint (median of 1.66 months following the completion of RT), all of whom subsequently developed clinical progression. At this first post-RT time point, patients with ctDNA-positivity had significantly worse progression-free survival (PFS) [hazard ratio (HR): 24.2, p=0.004], and ctDNA-positivity was the only significant prognostic factor associated with PFS (HR: 13.4, p=0.02) in a multivariate analysis. All patients who developed clinical recurrence had detectable ctDNA with an average lead time over radiographic progression of 5.4 months, and post-RT ctDNA positivity was significantly associated with poor PFS (p<0.0001). Conclusion Personalized, longitudinal ctDNA monitoring can detect recurrence early in patients with unresectable NSCLC patients undergoing curative radiation and potentially risk-stratify patients who might benefit most from treatment intensification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily S. Lebow
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
- The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Narek Shaverdian
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
| | | | | | - Megan McCune
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Yonina R. Murciano-Goroff
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, NY, United States
| | - Justin Jee
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, NY, United States
| | - Juliana Eng
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, NY, United States
| | - Jamie E. Chaft
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, NY, United States
| | - Mark G. Kris
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, NY, United States
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Abraham J. Wu
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
| | | | | | | | - Charles M. Rudin
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, NY, United States
| | - Daniel R. Gomez
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Pedram Razavi
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, NY, United States
| | | | - James M. Isbell
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, NY, United States
| | - Bob T. Li
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, NY, United States
| | - Andreas Rimner
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dhakal B, Sharma S, Balcioglu M, Shchegrova S, Malhotra M, Zimmermann B, Billings PR, Harrington A, Sethi H, Aleshin A, Hari PN. Assessment of Molecular Residual Disease Using Circulating Tumor DNA to Identify Multiple Myeloma Patients at High Risk of Relapse. Front Oncol 2022; 12:786451. [PMID: 35186734 PMCID: PMC8848740 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.786451] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2021] [Accepted: 01/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Despite treatment with high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (AHCT), patients with multiple myeloma (MM) invariably relapse. Molecular residual disease (MRD)-negativity post-AHCT has emerged as an important prognostic marker predicting the duration of remission. Current techniques for MRD assessment involve bone marrow (BM) aspirate sampling, which is invasive, subject to sample variability and is limited by spatial heterogeneity. We compared the performance of a non-invasive, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)-based MRD assay with multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) of marrow aspirate to predict relapse in AHCT recipients with MM. Methods MRD assessment using ctDNA was retrospectively analyzed on 80 plasma samples collected at different time points from 28 patients, post-AHCT. MFC was used to assess MRD from BM biopsy. Individual archived BM aspirate slides or formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded slides from the time of MM diagnosis and matched blood were used to assess MRD at 3 months, post-AHCT, using a personalized, tumor-informed ctDNA assay. Results ctDNA was detectable in 70.8% (17/24) of pre-AHCT patients and 53.6% (15/28) of post-AHCT patients (3-month time point). Of the 15 post-AHCT ctDNA-positive patients, 14 relapsed on follow-up. The median PFS for ctDNA-positive patients was 31 months, and that for ctDNA-negative patients was 84 months (HR: 5.6; 95%CI: 1.8-17;p=0.0003). No significant difference in PFS was observed in patients stratified by MFC-based MRD status (HR 1.2; 95%CI: 0.3-3.4;p=0.73). The positive predictive value for ctDNA was also significantly higher than MFC (93.3% vs. 68.4%). Conclusions This study demonstrates tumor-informed ctDNA analysis is strongly predictive of MM relapse.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Binod Dhakal
- Division of Blood and Marrow Transplant (BMT) & Cellular Therapy, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Alexandra Harrington
- Department of Pathology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States
| | | | | | - Parameswaran N Hari
- Division of Blood and Marrow Transplant (BMT) & Cellular Therapy, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gong J, Hendifar A, Gangi A, Zaghiyan K, Atkins K, Nasseri Y, Murrell Z, Figueiredo JC, Salvy S, Haile R, Hitchins M. Clinical Applications of Minimal Residual Disease Assessments by Tumor-Informed and Tumor-Uninformed Circulating Tumor DNA in Colorectal Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:4547. [PMID: 34572774 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13184547] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2021] [Revised: 09/08/2021] [Accepted: 09/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Circulating tumor DNA, or ctDNA, are fragments of tumor DNA that can be detected in the blood of patients with colorectal cancer. Measuring ctDNA levels in the blood has shown the potential to provide important information that can be helpful in the clinical care of patients with colorectal cancer. For example, in patients with colon cancer that has been removed by surgery, measuring ctDNA in the blood can predict the likelihood of cancer recurrence, while in those with metastatic colorectal cancer, measuring ctDNA can inform the clinician whether chemotherapy is effective at earlier timepoints than currently available tests. In this review, we discuss the results from ongoing studies describing the utility of ctDNA measurements across all stages of colorectal cancer. We also discuss the various clinical scenarios that ctDNA may have the most immediate impact in colorectal cancer management. Abstract Emerging data suggest that circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) can detect colorectal cancer (CRC)-specific signals across both non-metastatic and metastatic settings. With the development of multiple platforms, including tumor-informed and tumor-agnostic ctDNA assays and demonstration of their provocative analytic performance to detect minimal residual disease, there are now ongoing, phase III randomized clinical trials to evaluate their role in the management paradigm of CRC. In this review, we highlight landmark studies that have formed the basis for ongoing studies on the clinically applicability of plasma ctDNA assays in resected, stage I–III CRC and metastatic CRC. We discuss clinical settings by which ctDNA may have the most immediate impact in routine clinical practice. These include the potential for ctDNA to (1) guide surveillance and intensification or de-intensification strategies of adjuvant therapy in resected, stage I–III CRC, (2) predict treatment response to neoadjuvant therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer inclusive of total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT), and (3) predict response to systemic and surgical therapies in metastatic disease. We end by considering clinical variables that can influence our ability to reliably interpret ctDNA dynamics in the clinic.
Collapse
|