Glycogen Storage Disease Type Ia: Current Management Options, Burden and Unmet Needs

Glycogen storage disease type Ia (GSDIa) is caused by defective glucose-6-phosphatase, a key enzyme in carbohydrate metabolism. Affected individuals cannot release glucose during fasting and accumulate excess glycogen and fat in the liver and kidney, putting them at risk of severe hypoglycaemia and secondary metabolic perturbations. Good glycaemic/metabolic control through strict dietary treatment and regular doses of uncooked cornstarch (UCCS) is essential for preventing hypoglycaemia and long-term complications. Dietary treatment has improved the prognosis for patients with GSDIa; however, the disease itself, its management and monitoring have significant physical, psychological and psychosocial burden on individuals and parents/caregivers. Hypoglycaemia risk persists if a single dose of UCCS is delayed/missed or in cases of gastrointestinal intolerance. UCCS therapy is imprecise, does not treat the cause of disease, may trigger secondary metabolic manifestations and may not prevent long-term complications. We review the importance of and challenges associated with achieving good glycaemic/metabolic control in individuals with GSDIa and how this should be balanced with age-specific psychosocial development towards independence, management of anxiety and preservation of quality of life (QoL). The unmet need for treatment strategies that address the cause of disease, restore glucose homeostasis, reduce the risk of hypoglycaemia/secondary metabolic perturbations and improve QoL is also discussed.

Diurnal variability of glucose tetrasaccharide (Glc4) excretion in patients with glycogen storage disease type III

AIM

The urinary glucose tetrasaccharide, Glcα1-6Glcα1-4Glcα1-4Glc (Glc4), is a glycogen limit dextrin that is elevated in patients with glycogen storage disease (GSD) type III. We evaluated the potential of uncooked cornstarch therapy to interfere with Glc4 monitoring, by measuring the diurnal variability of Glc4 excretion in patients with GSD III.

METHODS

Voids were collected at home over 24 hours, stored at 4°C and frozen within 48 hours. Glc4 was analyzed using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry and normalized to creatinine.

RESULTS

Subjects with GSD III (median age: 13.5 years, range: 3.7-62; n = 18) completed one or more 24-hour urine collection, and 28/36 collections were accepted for analysis. Glc4 was elevated in 16/18 subjects (median: 13 mmol/mol creatinine, range: 2-75, reference range: <3). In collections with elevated Glc4 (23/28), two-thirds (15/23) had low diurnal variability in Glc4 excretion (coefficient of variation [CV%] <25). The diurnal variability was significantly correlated with the Glc4 concentration (Pearson R = .644, P < .05), but not with the dose of uncooked cornstarch. High intraday variability (>25%) was not consistently observed in repeat collections by the same subject.

CONCLUSIONS

The extent and variability of Glc4 excretion relative to creatinine was not correlated with cornstarch dose. A majority of collections showed low variability over 24 hours. These findings support the use of single time-point collections to evaluate Glc4 in patients with GSD III treated with cornstarch. However, repeat sampling over short time-periods will provide the most accurate assessment of Glc4 excretion, as intraday variability may be increased in patients with high Glc4 excretion.

Uncooked cornstarch for the prevention of hypoglycemic events

Hypoglycemia is a pathological condition characterized by a low plasma glucose concentration associated with typical autonomic and/or neuroglycopenic symptoms, and resolution of these symptoms with carbohydrate consumption. Hypoglycemia is quite common in clinical practice, particularly in insulin-treated patients with diabetes and in other inherited or acquired conditions involving the regulation of glucose metabolism. Beyond symptoms that might strongly affect the quality of life, hypoglycemia can lead to short- and long-term detrimental consequences for health. Hypoglycemia can be prevented by appropriate changes in dietary habits or by relevant modifications of the drug treatment. Several dietary approaches based on the intake of various carbohydrate foods have been tested for hypoglycemia prevention; among them uncooked cornstarch (UCS) has demonstrated a great efficacy. In this narrative review, we have summarized the current evidence on the UCS usefulness in some conditions characterized by high hypoglycemic risk, focusing on some inherited diseases -i.e. glycogen storage diseases and other rare disorders - and acquired conditions such as type 1 diabetes, postprandial hypoglycemia consequent to esophageal-gastric or bariatric surgery, and insulin autoimmune syndrome. We also considered the possible role of UCS during endurance exercise performance. Lastly, we have discussed the dose requirement, the side effects, the limitations of UCS use, and the plausible mechanisms by which UCS could prevent hypoglycemia.

Dietary Management of the Glycogen Storage Diseases: Evolution of Treatment and Ongoing Controversies

The hepatic glycogen storage diseases (GSDs) are a group of disorders where abnormal storage or release of glycogen leads to potentially life-threatening hypoglycemia and metabolic disturbances. Dietary interventions have markedly improved the outcome for these disorders, from a previously fatal condition to one where people can do well with proper care. This article chronicles the evolution of dietary management and treatment of the hepatic GSDs (types 0, I, III, VI, IX, and XI). We examine historic and current approaches for preventing hypoglycemia associated with GSDs. There is a lack of consensus on the optimal dietary management of GSDs despite decades of research, and the ongoing controversies are discussed.

Molecular Diagnosis of Panel-Based Next-Generation Sequencing Approach and Clinical Symptoms in Patients With Glycogen Storage Disease: A Single Center Retrospective Study

Aim: The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical utility of panel-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) in the diagnostic approach of glycogen storage disease (GSD). Methods: We performed a retrospective review of the 32 cases with suspected GSDs between April 2013 and November 2019 through panel-based NGS, clinical and biochemical data and long-term complications. Results: Of the 32 clinical cases, we identified 41 different variants, including 24 missense (58.5%), one synonymous (2.4%), three nonsense (8%), one splice (2.4%), four frameshift (9.8%), one deletion (2.4%), four insertions (9.8%), two deletion-insertion (4.9%) and one duplication(2.4%), of which 13(31.7%) were previously unreported in the literature. In addition, patients with different types of GSDs showed important differences in biochemical parameters (i.e., CK, rGGT, TG, and UA). Conclusions: The panel-based NGS played an important diagnostic role in the suspicious GSDs patients, especially in the mild phenotype and ruled out detectable pathologic conditions. Besides, differences between our GSDs patients reflect biochemical heterogeneity.

Liver transplantation for glycogen storage disease types I, III, and IV

Glycogen storage disease (GSD) types I, III, and IV can be associated with severe liver disease. The possible development of hepatocellular carcinoma and/or hepatic failure make these GSDs potential candidates for liver transplantation. Early diagnosis and initiation of effective dietary therapy have dramatically improved the outcome of GSD type I by reducing the incidence of liver adenoma and renal insufficiency. Nine type I and 3 type III patients have received liver transplants because of poor metabolic control, multiple liver adenomas, or progressive liver failure. Metabolic abnormalities were corrected in all GSD type I and type III patients, while catch-up growth was reported only in two patients. Whether liver transplantation results in reversal and/or prevention of renal disease remains unclear. Neutropenia persisted in both GSDIb patients post liver transplantation necessitating continuous granulocyte colony stimulating factor treatment. Thirteen GSD type IV patients were liver transplanted because of progressive liver cirrhosis and failure. All but one patient have not had neuromuscular or cardiac complications during follow-up periods for as long as 13 years. Four have died within a week and 5 years after transplantation. Caution should be taken in selecting GSD type IV candidates for liver transplantation because of the variable phenotype, which may include life-limiting extrahepatic manifestations. It remains to be evaluated, whether a genotype-phenotype correlation exists for GSD type IV, which may aid in the decision making.

CONCLUSION

Liver transplantation should be considered for patients with glycogen storage disease who have developed liver malignancy or hepatic failure, and for type IV patients with the classical and progressive hepatic form.