A novel TASK channel antagonist nasal spray reduces sleep apnea severity in physiological responders: a randomized, blinded, trial

Preclinical and human physiological studies indicate that topical, selective TASK 1/3 K+ channel antagonism increases upper airway dilator muscle activity and reduces pharyngeal collapsibility during anesthesia and nasal breathing during sleep. The primary aim of this study was to determine the effects of BAY2586116 nasal spray on obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) severity and whether individual responses vary according to differences in physiological responses and route of breathing. Ten people (5 females) with OSA [apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) = 47 ± 26 events/h (means ± SD)] who completed previous sleep physiology studies with BAY2586116 were invited to return for three polysomnography studies to quantify OSA severity. In random order, participants received either placebo nasal spray (saline), BAY2586116 nasal spray (160 µg), or BAY2586116 nasal spray (160 µg) restricted to nasal breathing (chinstrap or mouth tape). Physiological responders were defined a priori as those who had improved upper airway collapsibility (critical closing pressure ≥2 cmH2O) with BAY2586116 nasal spray (NCT04236440). There was no systematic change in apnea-hypopnea index (AHI3) from placebo versus BAY2586116 with either unrestricted or nasal-only breathing versus placebo (47 ± 26 vs. 43 ± 27 vs. 53 ± 33 events/h, P = 0.15). However, BAY2586116 (unrestricted breathing) reduced OSA severity in physiological responders compared with placebo (e.g., AHI3 = 28 ± 11 vs. 36 ± 12 events/h, P = 0.03 and ODI3 = 18 ± 10 vs. 28 ± 12 events/h, P = 0.02). Morning blood pressure was also lower in physiological responders after BAY2586116 versus placebo (e.g., systolic blood pressure = 137 ± 24 vs. 147 ± 21 mmHg, P < 0.01). In conclusion, BAY2586116 reduces OSA severity during sleep in people who demonstrate physiological improvement in upper airway collapsibility. These findings highlight the therapeutic potential of this novel pharmacotherapy target in selected individuals.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Preclinical findings in pigs and humans indicate that blocking potassium channels in the upper airway with topical nasal application increases pharyngeal dilator muscle activity and reduces upper airway collapsibility. In this study, BAY2586116 nasal spray (potassium channel blocker) reduced sleep apnea severity in those who had physiological improvement in upper airway collapsibility. BAY2586116 lowered the next morning's blood pressure. These findings highlight the potential for this novel therapeutic approach to improve sleep apnea in certain people.

The norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor reboxetine alone reduces obstructive sleep apnea severity: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized crossover trial

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Recent findings indicate that noradrenergic and muscarinic processes are crucial for pharyngeal muscle control during sleep. However, to date, reductions in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) severity have only been detected when noradrenergic agents are combined with an antimuscarinic. Accordingly, this study aimed to determine if reboxetine alone and combined with oxybutynin reduces OSA severity. The pathophysiological mechanisms underpinning the effects of these agents were also investigated via endotyping analysis.

METHODS

Sixteen people (6 women) with OSA completed 3 polysomnograms (∼1-week washout) according to a double-blind, placebo-controlled, three-way crossover design across 2 sites. Single doses of 4 mg reboxetine, placebo, or 4 mg reboxetine + 5 mg oxybutynin were administered before sleep (order randomized).

RESULTS

Reboxetine reduced the apnea-hypopnea index (primary outcome) by 5.4 (95% confidence interval -10.4 to -0.3) events/h, P = .03 (-24 ± 27% in men; -0.7 ± 32% in women). Oxybutynin did not cause additional reductions in apnea-hypopnea index. Reboxetine alone reduced the 4% oxygen desaturation index by (mean ± standard deviation) 5.2 ± 7.2 events/h and reboxetine+oxybutynin by 5.1 ± 10.6 events/h vs placebo, P = .02. Nadir oxygen saturation also increased by 7 ± 11% with reboxetine and 5 ± 9% with reboxetine+oxybutynin vs placebo, P = .01. Mechanistically, reboxetine and reboxetine+oxybutynin improved pharyngeal collapsibility and respiratory control (loop gain). Larger reductions in apnea-hypopnea index with reboxetine in men were associated with higher baseline loop gain.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings show the first evidence that reboxetine alone reduces OSA severity. The data provide novel insight into the role of norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors on upper airway stability during sleep and are important to inform future pharmacotherapy development for OSA.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

Registry: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry; Name: Reboxetine and Combination Therapy with AD128 in Sleep Apnoea Trial: A Double-Blind, 3-Way Cross-Over Study; URL: https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=374614&isReview=true; Identifier: ACTRN12620000662965.

CITATION

Altree TJ, Aishah A, Loffler KA, Grunstein RR, Eckert DJ. The norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor reboxetine alone reduces obstructive sleep apnea severity: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized crossover trial. J Clin Sleep Med. 2023;19(1):85-96.

Topical Potassium Channel Blockage Improves Pharyngeal Collapsibility: A Translational, Placebo-Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Potassium channel inhibition has been identified in animal models as a potential target to increase pharyngeal dilator muscle activity and to treat OSA. However, these findings have not yet been translated to humans.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Does a novel, potent, TWIK-related acid-sensitive K⁺ (TASK) 1/3 channel antagonist, BAY2586116, improve pharyngeal collapsibility in pigs and humans, and secondarily, what is the optimal dose and method of topical application?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

In the preclinical study, pharyngeal muscle activity and upper-airway collapsibility via transient negative pressure application was quantified in 13 anesthetized pigs during administration of placebo, 0.3 μg, 3 μg, and 30 μg nasal drops of BAY2586116. In the clinical study, 12 people with OSA instrumented with polysomnography equipment, an epiglottic pressure catheter, pneumotachograph, and nasal mask to monitor sleep and breathing performed up to four detailed upper airway sleep physiology studies. Participants received BAY2586116 or placebo nasal spray (160 μg) before sleep via a double-masked, randomized, crossover design. Most participants also returned for three additional overnight visits: (1) nasal drops (160 μg), (2) half-dose nasal spray (80 μg), and (3) direct endoscopic application (160 μg). The upper-airway critical closing pressure during sleep was quantified at each visit.

RESULTS

Consistent and sustained improvements in pharyngeal collapsibility to negative pressure were found with 3 and 30 μg of BAY2586116 vs placebo in pigs. Similarly, BAY2586116 improved pharyngeal collapsibility by an average of approximately 2 cm H₂O vs placebo, regardless of topical application method and dose (P < .008, mixed model) in participants with OSA.

INTERPRETATION

Acute topical application of BAY2586116 improves upper-airway collapsibility in anesthetized pigs and sleeping humans with OSA. These novel physiologic findings highlight the therapeutic potential to target POTASSIUM channel mechanisms to treat OSA.

TRIAL REGISTRY

ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT04236440; URL: www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov.

Impaired pharyngeal reflex responses to negative pressure: A novel cause of sleep apnea in multiple sclerosis

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is common in people with multiple sclerosis (MS). However, people with MS often do not have 'typical' anatomical risk factors (i.e. non-obese and female predominance). Accordingly, non-anatomical factors such as impaired upper airway muscle function may be particularly important for OSA pathogenesis in MS. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate genioglossus (largest upper-airway dilator muscle) reflex responses to brief pulses of upper airway negative pressure in people with OSA and MS. 11 people with MS and OSA and 10 OSA controls without MS matched for age, sex and OSA severity were fitted with a nasal mask, pneumotachograph, choanal and epiglottic pressure sensors and intramuscular electrodes into genioglossus. Approximately 60 brief (250ms) negative pressure pulses (~-12cmH₂O mask pressure) were delivered every 2-6 breaths at random during quiet nasal breathing during wakefulness to determine genioglossus EMG reflex responses (timing, amplitude and morphology). Where available, recent clinical MRI brain scans were evaluated for the number, size and location of brainstem lesions in the MS group. When present, genioglossus reflex excitation responses were similar between MS participants and controls (e.g. peak excitation amplitude 229±85 vs. 282±98 % baseline, p=0.17). However, ~30% of people with MS had either an abnormal (predominantly inhibition) or no protective excitation reflex. Participants with MS without a reflex had multiple brainstem lesions including in the hypoglossal motor nucleus which may impair sensory processing and/or efferent output. Impaired pharyngeal reflex function may be an important contributor to OSA pathogenesis for a proportion of people with MS.

Swallowing biomechanics pre-multi-level and post-multi-level upper airway surgery for obstructive sleep apnea

STUDY OBJECTIVES

The effect of contemporary multi-level upper airway surgery for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) on swallowing is unclear. This study assessed the biomechanical swallowing function in participants with OSA pre- and post-modified uvulopalatopharyngoplasty and coblation channeling of the tongue (mUPPP+CCT).

METHODS

In this prospective, longitudinal study adults diagnosed with moderate-severe OSA who underwent mUPPP+CCT surgery had swallowing biomechanics assessed using high-resolution pharyngeal manometry (HRPM) and analyzed with swallowgateway.com. Symptomatic swallowing difficulty was evaluated using the Sydney Swallow Questionnaire (SSQ ≥234). General linear mixed model analysis was conducted to evaluate the difference pre- and post-mUPPP+CCT. Data presented as mean [95% confidence intervals].

RESULTS

HRPM assessments were conducted in 10 participants (7 male; median age 50 [IQR 36-65]) pre- and repeated post-operatively at 9 months [IQR 6-13]. Self-reported dysphagia was unchanged following surgery (SSQ 149 [53, 447] to 168 [54, 247]; P =0.093). HRPM outcomes indicated reduced mesopharyngeal pressures (148 [135, 161] to 124 [112, 137] mm Hg.s.cm; P =0.011), reduced hypopharyngeal pressures (113 [101, 125] to 93 [84, 102] mm Hg.s.cm; P =0.011) and reduced upper esophageal sphincter relaxation pressure (5 [4, 6] to 2 [1,3] mm Hg; P =0.001) but no change to velopharyngeal pressures (135 [123, 147] to 137 [117, 157] mm Hg.s.cm; P =0.850) post-surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

mUPPP may have less implications on the swallow mechanism than previously suspected. In contrast, the reduction in mesopharyngeal contractile pressures associated with CCT, although within normal limits, may effect bolus propulsion. Biomechanical alterations were insufficient to worsen self-reported swallowing function.

The noradrenergic agent reboxetine plus the antimuscarinic hyoscine butylbromide reduces sleep apnoea severity: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised crossover trial

KEY POINTS

Recent animal and human physiology studies indicate that noradrenergic and muscarinic processes are key mechanisms that mediate pharyngeal muscle control during sleep. The noradrenergic agent reboxetine combined with the anti-muscarinic hyoscine butylbromide has recently been shown to improve upper airway function during sleep in healthy individuals. However, whether these findings translate to the clinically relevant patient population of people with obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA), and the effects of the agents on OSA severity, are unknown. We found that reboxetine plus hyoscine butylbromide reduced OSA severity, including overnight hypoxaemia, via increases in pharyngeal muscle responsiveness, improvements in respiratory control and airway collapsibility without changing the respiratory arousal threshold. These findings provide mechanistic insight into the role of noradrenergic and anti-muscarinic agents on upper airway stability and breathing during sleep and are important for pharmacotherapy development for OSA.

ABSTRACT

The noradrenergic agent reboxetine combined with the anti-muscarinic hyoscine butylbromide has recently been shown to improve upper airway function during sleep in healthy individuals. However, the effects of this drug combination on obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) severity are unknown. Accordingly, this study aimed to determine if reboxetine plus hyoscine butylbromide reduces OSA severity. Secondary aims were to investigate the effects on key upper airway physiology and endotypic traits. Twelve people with OSA aged 52 ± 13 years, BMI = 30 ± 5 kg/m² , completed a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, crossover trial (ACTRN12617001326381). Two in-laboratory sleep studies with nasal mask, pneumotachograph, epiglottic pressure sensor and bipolar fine-wire electrodes into genioglossus and tensor palatini muscles were performed separated by approximately 1 week. Each participant received either reboxetine (4 mg) plus hyoscine butylbromide (20 mg), or placebo immediately prior to sleep. Polysomnography, upper airway physiology and endotypic estimates of OSA were compared between conditions. Reboxetine plus hyoscine butylbromide reduced the apnoea/hypopnoea index by (mean ± SD) 17 ± 17 events/h from 51 ± 30 to 33 ± 22 events/h (P = 0.005) and nadir oxygen saturation increased by 6 ± 5% from 82 ± 5 to 88 ± 2% (P = 0.002). The drug combination increased tonic genioglossus muscle responsiveness during non-REM sleep (median [25th, 75th centiles]: -0.007 [-0.0004, -0.07] vs. -0.12 [-0.02, -0.40] %maxEMG/cmH₂ O, P = 0.02), lowered loop gain (0.43 ± 0.06 vs. 0.39 ± 0.07, P = 0.01), and improved airway collapsibility (90 [69, 95] vs. 93 [88, 96] %eupnoea, P = 0.02), without changing the arousal threshold (P = 0.39). These findings highlight the important role that noradrenergic and muscarinic processes have on upper airway function during sleep and the potential for pharmacotherapy to target these mechanisms to treat OSA.

Different antimuscarinics when combined with atomoxetine have differential effects on obstructive sleep apnea severity

The combination of the noradrenergic agent atomoxetine plus the antimuscarinic oxybutynin has recently been shown to improve upper airway physiology and reduce obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) severity. However, the effects of different antimuscarinics when combined with atomoxetine is limited. This study aimed to determine the effects of atomoxetine combined with two different antimuscarinics with varying M-subtype receptor selectivity on OSA severity and upper airway physiology. Ten people with predominantly severe OSA completed a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, cross-over trial. Participants completed three overnight in-laboratory sleep studies after either 80 mg atomoxetine + 5 mg solifenacin succinate (ato-sol) or 80 mg atomoxetine + 2 mg biperiden hydrochloride (ato-bip) or placebo. OSA severity, ventilatory stability (loop gain), respiratory-arousal threshold (via epiglottic manometry), next-day subjective sleepiness [Karolinska Sleepiness Scale (KSS)], and alertness were compared between conditions. Neither drug combination altered the apnea/hypopnea index versus placebo (P = 0.63). Ato-sol caused a shift toward milder respiratory events with reduced frequency of obstructive apneas (13 ± 14 vs. 22 ± 17 events/h; means ± SD, P = 0.04) and increased hypopneas during nonrapid eye movement (NREM) (38 ± 21 vs. 24 ± 18 events/h, P = 0.006) with improved nadir oxygenation versus placebo (83 ± 4 vs. 80 ± 8%, P = 0.03). Both combinations reduced loop gain by ∼10% versus placebo; sleep efficiency and arousal threshold were unaltered. Ato-bip reduced next-day sleepiness versus placebo (KSS = 4.3 ± 2.2 vs. 5.6 ± 1.6, P = 0.03). Atomoxetine + biperiden hydrochloride reduces perceived sleepiness, and atomoxetine + solifenacin modestly improves upper airway function in people with OSA but to a lesser extent versus recently published atomoxetine + oxybutynin (broad M-subtype receptor selectivity) findings. These results provide novel mechanistic insight into the role of noradrenergic and antimuscarinic agents on sleep and breathing and are important for pharmacotherapy development for OSA.NEW & NOTEWORTHY In contrast to recent findings of major reductions in OSA severity when atomoxetine is combined with a nonspecific antimuscarinic, oxybutynin (broad M-subtype receptor selectivity), addition of solifenacin succinate (M2 and M3 muscarinic receptor selectivity) or biperiden (M1 muscarinic receptor selectivity) with atomoxetine had modest effects on upper airway function during sleep, which provide mechanistic insight into the role of noradrenergic and antimuscarinic agents on sleep and breathing and are important for pharmacotherapy development for OSA.

Influence of head flexion and rotation on obstructive sleep apnea severity during supine sleep

Head posture influences the collapsibility of the passive upper airway during anaesthesia. However, little is known about the impact of head posture during sleep. The objective of this study was to develop and validate an instrument to measure head posture during supine sleep and to apply this instrument to investigate the influence of head posture on obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) severity. A customized instrument to quantify head flexion and rotation during supine sleep was developed and validated in a benchtop experiment. Twenty-eight participants with suspected OSA were successfully studied using diagnostic polysomnography with the addition of the customized instrument. Head posture in supine sleep was discretized into four categories by two variables: head flexed or not (flexion >15°); and head rotated or not (rotation >45°). Sleep time in each posture and the posture-specific apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) were quantified. Linear mixed-effect modelling was applied to determine the influence of flexion and rotation on supine OSA severity. Twenty-four participants had ≥15 min of supine sleep in at least one head-posture category. Only one participant had ≥15 min of supine sleep time with the head extended. Head flexion was associated with a 12.9 events/h increase in the AHI (95% CI: 3.7-22.1, p = .007). Head rotation was associated with an 11.0 events/h decrease in the AHI (95% CI: 0.3-21.6, p = .04). Despite substantial interparticipant variability, head flexion worsened OSA severity, and head rotation improved OSA severity. Interventions to promote rotation and restrict flexion may have therapeutic benefit in selected patients.

Zolpidem increases sleep efficiency and the respiratory arousal threshold without changing sleep apnoea severity and pharyngeal muscle activity

KEY POINTS

A decreased respiratory arousal threshold is one of the main contributors to obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) pathogenesis. Several recent studies have sought to find a drug capable of increasing the respiratory arousal threshold without impairing pharyngeal muscle activity to reduce OSA severity, with variable success. Here we show that zolpidem increases the respiratory arousal threshold by ∼15%, an effect size which was insufficient to systematically decrease OSA severity as measured by the apnoea-hypopnoea index. Unlike recent physiological findings that showed paradoxical increases in pharyngeal muscle responsiveness during transient manipulations of airway pressure, zolpidem did not alter pharyngeal muscle responsiveness during natural sleep. It did, however, increase sleep efficiency without changing apnoea length, oxygen desaturation, next-day perceived sleepiness and alertness. These novel findings indicate that zolpidem was well tolerated and effective in promoting sleep in people with OSA, which may be therapeutically useful for people with OSA and comorbid insomnia.

ABSTRACT

A recent physiology study performed using continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) manipulations indicated that the hypnotic zolpidem increases the arousal threshold and genioglossus responsiveness in people with and without obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). Thus, zolpidem may stabilise breathing and reduce OSA severity without CPAP. Accordingly, we sought to determine the effects of zolpidem on OSA severity, upper airway physiology and next-day sleepiness and alertness. Nineteen people with OSA with low-to-moderate arousal threshold received 10 mg zolpidem or placebo according to a double-blind, randomised, cross-over design. Participants completed two overnight in-laboratory polysomnographies (1-week washout), with an epiglottic catheter, intramuscular genioglossus electromyography, nasal mask and pneumotachograph to measure OSA severity, arousal threshold and upper airway muscle responsiveness. Next-morning sleepiness and alertness were also assessed. Zolpidem did not change the apnoea-hypopnoea index versus placebo (40.6 ± 12.3 vs. 40.3 ± 16.4 events/h (means ± SD), p = 0.938) or nadir oxyhaemoglobin saturation (79.6 ± 6.6 vs. 79.7 ± 7.4%, p = 0.932), but was well tolerated. Zolpidem increased sleep efficiency by 9 ± 14% (83 ± 11 vs. 73 ± 17%, p = 0.010). Arousal threshold increased by 15 ± 5% with zolpidem throughout all sleep stages (p = 0.010), whereas genioglossus muscle responsiveness did not change. Next-morning sleepiness and alertness were not different between nights. In summary, a single night of 10 mg zolpidem is well tolerated and does not cause next-day impairment in alertness or sleepiness, or overnight hypoxaemia in OSA. However, despite increases in arousal threshold without any change in pharyngeal muscle responsiveness, zolpidem does not alter OSA severity. It does, however, increase sleep efficiency by ∼10%, which may be beneficial in people with OSA and insomnia.

Efficacy of a novel oral appliance and the role of posture on nasal resistance in obstructive sleep apnea

STUDY OBJECTIVES

High nasal resistance is associated with oral appliance treatment failure in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). A novel oral appliance with a built-in oral airway has been shown to reduce pharyngeal pressure swings during sleep and may be efficacious in those with high nasal resistance. The role of posture and mandibular advancement on nasal resistance in OSA remains unclear. This study aimed to determine (1) the effects of posture and mandibular advancement on nasal resistance in OSA and (2) the efficacy of a new oral appliance device including in patients with high nasal resistance.

METHODS

A total of 39 people with OSA (7 females, apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) (mean ± standard deviation) = 29 ± 21 events/h) completed split-night polysomnography with and without oral appliance (order randomized). Prior to sleep, participants were instrumented with a nasal mask, pneumotachograph, and a choanal pressure catheter for gold standard nasal resistance quantification seated, supine and lateral (with and without oral appliance, order randomized).

RESULTS

Awake nasal resistance increased from seated, to supine, to lateral posture (median [interquartile range] = 1.8 [1.4, 2.7], 2.7 [1.7, 3.5], 3.4 [1.9, 4.6] cm H₂O/L/s, P < .001). Corresponding measures of nasal resistance did not change with mandibular advancement (2.3 [1.4, 3.5], 2.5 [1.8, 3.6], 3.5 [1.9, 4.8] cm H₂O/L/s, P = .388). The median AHI reduced by 47% with oral appliance therapy (29 ± 21 versus 18 ± 15 events/h, P = .002). Participants with high nasal resistance (> 3 cm H₂O/L/s) had similar reductions in AHI versus those with normal nasal resistance (61 [-8, 82] versus 40 [-5, 62] %, P = .244).

CONCLUSIONS

Nasal resistance changes with posture in people with OSA. A novel oral appliance with a built-in oral airway reduces OSA severity in people with OSA, including in those with high nasal resistance.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

Registry: ANZCTR; Title: Combination therapy for obstructive sleep apnoea; Identifier: ACTRN12617000492358; URL: https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=372279.

Reboxetine and hyoscine butylbromide improve upper airway function during nonrapid eye movement and suppress rapid eye movement sleep in healthy individuals

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Recent findings indicate that noradrenergic and antimuscarinic processes are crucial for sleep-related reductions in pharyngeal muscle activity. However, there are few human studies. Accordingly, this study aimed to determine if a combined noradrenergic and antimuscarinic intervention increases pharyngeal dilator muscle activity and improves airway function in sleeping humans.

METHODS

Genioglossus (GG) and tensor palatini electromyography (EMG), pharyngeal pressure, upper airway resistance, and breathing parameters were acquired in 10 healthy adults (5 female) during two overnight sleep studies after 4 mg of reboxetine (REB) plus 20 mg of hyoscine butylbromide (HBB) or placebo using a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, cross-over design.

RESULTS

Compared with placebo, peak and tonic GG EMG were lower (Mean ± SD: 83 ± 73 vs. 130 ± 75, p = 0.021 and 102 ± 102 vs. 147 ± 123 % wakefulness, p = 0.021, respectively) but the sleep-related reduction in tensor palatini was less (Median [25th, 75th centiles]: 53[45, 62] vs. 34[28, 38] % wakefulness, p = 0.008) with the drug combination during nonrapid eye movement (non-REM) sleep. These changes were accompanied by improved upper airway function including reduced pharyngeal pressure swings, airway resistance, respiratory load compensation, and increased breathing frequency during N2. REB and HBB significantly reduced rapid eye movement sleep compared with placebo (0.6 ± 1.1 vs. 14.5 ± 6.8 % total sleep time, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Contrary to our hypothesis, GG muscle activity (% wakefulness) during non-REM sleep was lower with REB and HBB. However, sleep-related reductions in tensor palatini activity were less and upper airway function improved. These findings provide mechanistic insight into the role of noradrenergic and antimuscarinic processes on upper airway function in humans and have therapeutic potential for obstructive sleep apnea.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, https://www.anzctr.org.au, trial ID: ACTRN12616000469415.

Hypoglossal nerve stimulation therapy does not alter tongue protrusion strength and fatigability in obstructive sleep apnea

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HNS) is an effective surgical alternative for patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). HNS therapy relies on the stimulation of the hypoglossal nerve to open the upper airways. This stimulation could lead to alterations in tongue strength and fatigability, which could alter treatment outcome over time. The aim of the study was to investigate whether HNS alters tongue strength and fatigability.

METHODS

Tongue protrusion strength (peak pressure in kPa) and fatigability (time to task failure during 50% of peak pressure contraction) were measured with a pressure transducer at least 2 months after HNS implantation (n = 30). These results were compared to a group of patients with OSA (n = 38) and a non-OSA control group (n = 35).

RESULTS

Median tongue protrusion strength was lower (54.7 [43.8, 63.0] versus 60.7 [53.7, 66.0] kPa, P = .013) and fatigue occurred more quickly (21.3 [17.4, 26.3] versus 26.0 [19.3, 31.3] seconds, P = .017) in the patients with OSA compared to the non-OSA control group. In multiple regression analysis, age was a significant factor for tongue strength and diagnosis of OSA for tongue fatigability. Tongue strength and fatigability did not differ between patients with OSA with conservative therapy or observation versus after HNS implantation (51.8 [41.3, 63.4] versus 56.3 [45.0, 62.3] kPa, P = .502; 20.8 [16.3, 26.2] versus 21.8 [18.3, 26.8] seconds, P = .418).

CONCLUSIONS

Tongue strength decreases with age. Tongue fatigability is more pronounced in people with OSA. However, approximately 1.5 years of HNS therapy on average does not alter tongue strength or fatigability compared to an OSA control group.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov; Title: Change in Tongue Strength and Fatigue After Upper Airway Stimulation Therapy; Identifier: NCT03980158.

Genioglossus reflex responses to negative upper airway pressure are altered in people with tetraplegia and obstructive sleep apnoea

KEY POINTS

Protective reflexes in the throat area (upper airway) are crucial for breathing. Impairment of these reflexes can cause breathing problems during sleep such as obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). OSA is very common in people with spinal cord injury for unknown reasons. This study shows major changes in protective reflexes that serve to keep the upper airway open in response to suction pressures in people with tetraplegia and OSA. These results help us understand why OSA is so common in people with tetraplegia and provide new insight into how protective upper airway reflexes work more broadly.

ABSTRACT

More than 60% of people with tetraplegia have obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). However, the specific causes are unknown. Genioglossus, the largest upper-airway dilator muscle, is important in maintaining upper-airway patency. Impaired genioglossus muscle function following spinal cord injury may contribute to OSA. This study aimed to determine if genioglossus reflex responses to negative upper-airway pressure are altered in people with OSA and tetraplegia compared to non-neurologically impaired able-bodied individuals with OSA. Genioglossus reflex responses measured via intramuscular electrodes to ∼60 brief (250 ms) pulses of negative upper-airway pressure (∼-15 cmH₂ O at the mask) were compared between 13 participants (2 females) with tetraplegia plus OSA and 9 able-bodied controls (2 females) matched for age and OSA severity. The initial short-latency excitatory reflex response was absent in 6/13 people with tetraplegia and 1/9 controls. Genioglossus reflex inhibition in the absence of excitation was observed in three people with tetraplegia and none of the controls. When the excitatory response was present, it was significantly delayed in the tetraplegia group compared to able-bodied controls: excitation onset latency (mean ± SD) was 32 ± 16 vs. 18 ± 9 ms, P = 0.045; peak excitation latency was 48 ± 17 vs. 33 ± 8 ms, P = 0.038. However, when present, amplitude of the excitation response was not different between groups, 195 ± 26 vs. 219 ± 98% at baseline, P = 0.55. There are major differences in genioglossus reflex morphology and timing in response to rapid changes in airway pressure in people with tetraplegia and OSA. Altered genioglossus function may contribute to the increased risk of OSA in people with tetraplegia. The precise mechanisms mediating these differences are unknown.

Obstructive sleep apnea: current perspectives

The prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) continues to rise. So too do the health, safety, and economic consequences. On an individual level, the causes and consequences of OSA can vary substantially between patients. In recent years, four key contributors to OSA pathogenesis or "phenotypes" have been characterized. These include a narrow, crowded, or collapsible upper airway "anatomical compromise" and "non-anatomical" contributors such as ineffective pharyngeal dilator muscle function during sleep, a low threshold for arousal to airway narrowing during sleep, and unstable control of breathing (high loop gain). Each of these phenotypes is a target for therapy. This review summarizes the latest knowledge on the different contributors to OSA with a focus on measurement techniques including emerging clinical tools designed to facilitate translation of new cause-driven targeted approaches to treat OSA. The potential for some of the specific pathophysiological causes of OSA to drive some of the key symptoms and consequences of OSA is also highlighted.

Loop Gain Predicts the Response to Upper Airway Surgery in Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Study Objectives

Upper airway surgery is often recommended to treat patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) who cannot tolerate continuous positive airways pressure. However, the response to surgery is variable, potentially because it does not improve the nonanatomical factors (ie, loop gain [LG] and arousal threshold) causing OSA. Measuring these traits clinically might predict responses to surgery. Our primary objective was to test the value of LG and arousal threshold to predict surgical success defined as 50% reduction in apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) and AHI <10 events/hour post surgery.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed data from patients who underwent upper airway surgery for OSA (n = 46). Clinical estimates of LG and arousal threshold were calculated from routine polysomnographic recordings presurgery and postsurgery (median of 124 [91-170] days follow-up).

Results

Surgery reduced both the AHI (39.1 ± 4.2 vs. 26.5 ± 3.6 events/hour; p < .005) and estimated arousal threshold (-14.8 [-22.9 to -10.2] vs. -9.4 [-14.5 to -6.0] cmH2O) but did not alter LG (0.45 ± 0.08 vs. 0.45 ± 0.12; p = .278). Responders to surgery had a lower baseline LG (0.38 ± 0.02 vs. 0.48 ± 0.01, p < .05) and were younger (31.0 [27.3-42.5] vs. 43.0 [33.0-55.3] years, p < .05) than nonresponders. Lower LG remained a significant predictor of surgical success after controlling for covariates (logistic regression p = .018; receiver operating characteristic area under curve = 0.80).

Conclusions

Our study provides proof-of-principle that upper airway surgery most effectively resolves OSA in patients with lower LG. Predicting the failure of surgical treatment, consequent to less stable ventilatory control (elevated LG), can be achieved in the clinic and may facilitate avoidance of surgical failures.

Dynamic loop gain increases upon adopting the supine body position during sleep in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is typically worse in the supine versus lateral sleeping position. One potential factor driving this observation is a decrease in lung volume in the supine position which is expected by theory to increase a key OSA pathogenic factor: dynamic ventilatory control instability (i.e. loop gain). We aimed to quantify dynamic loop gain in OSA patients in the lateral and supine positions, and to explore the relationship between change in dynamic loop gain and change in lung volume with position.

METHODS

Data from 20 patients enrolled in previous studies on the effect of body position on OSA pathogenesis were retrospectively analysed. Dynamic loop gain was calculated from routinely collected polysomnographic signals using a previously validated mathematical model. Lung volumes were measured in the awake state with a nitrogen washout technique.

RESULTS

Dynamic loop gain was significantly higher in the supine than in the lateral position (0.77 ± 0.15 vs 0.68 ± 0.14, P = 0.012). Supine functional residual capacity (FRC) was significantly lower than lateral FRC (81.0 ± 15.4% vs 87.3 ± 18.4% of the seated FRC, P = 0.021). The reduced FRC we observed on moving to the supine position was predicted by theory to increase loop gain by 10.2 (0.6, 17.1)%, a value similar to the observed increase of 8.4 (-1.5, 31.0)%.

CONCLUSION

Dynamic loop gain increased by a small but statistically significant amount when moving from the lateral to supine position and this may, in part, contribute to the worsening of OSA in the supine sleeping position.

Nasal Resistance Is Elevated in People with Tetraplegia and Is Reduced by Topical Sympathomimetic Administration

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is common in individuals with tetraplegia and associated with adverse health outcomes. The causes of the high prevalence of OSA in this population are unknown, but it is important to understand as standard treatments are poorly tolerated in tetraplegia. Nasal congestion is common in tetraplegia, possibly because of unopposed parasympathetic activity. Further, nasal obstruction can induce OSA in healthy individuals. We therefore aimed to compare nasal resistance before and after topical administration of a sympathomimetic between 10 individuals with tetraplegia (T) and 9 able-bodied (AB) controls matched for OSA severity, gender, and age.

METHODS

Nasal, pharyngeal, and total upper airway resistance were calculated before and every 2 minutes following delivery of ≈0.05 mL of 0.5% atomized phenylephrine to the nostrils and pharyngeal airway. The surface tension of the upper airway lining liquid was also assessed.

RESULTS

At baseline, individuals with tetraplegia had elevated nasal resistance (T = 7.0 ± 1.9, AB = 3.0 ± 0.6 cm H₂O/L/s), that rapidly fell after phenylephrine (T = 2.3 ± 0.4, p = 0.03 at 2 min) whereas the able-bodied did not change (AB = 2.5 ± 0.5 cm H₂O/L/s, p = 0.06 at 2 min). Pharyngeal resistance was non-significantly higher in individuals with tetraplegia than controls at baseline (T = 2.6 ± 0.9, AB = 1.2 ± 0.4 cm H₂O/L/s) and was not altered by phenylephrine in either group. The surface tension of the upper airway lining liquid did not differ between groups (T = 64.3 ± 1.0, AB = 62.7 ± 0.6 mN/m).

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that the unopposed parasympathetic activity in tetraplegia increases nasal resistance, potentially contributing to the high occurrence of OSA in this population.

Zopiclone Increases the Arousal Threshold without Impairing Genioglossus Activity in Obstructive Sleep Apnea

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To determine the effects of the nonbenzodiazepine sedative zopiclone on the threshold to arousal with increasing respiratory effort and genioglossus muscle activity and to examine potential physiological factors mediating disparate effects of zopiclone on obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) severity between patients.

METHODS

Twelve patients with OSA (apnea-hypopnea index = 41 ± 8 events/h) were studied during 2 single night sleep studies conducted approximately 1 w apart after receiving 7.5 mg of zopiclone or placebo according to a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, crossover design. The respiratory arousal threshold (epiglottic pressure immediately prior to arousal during naturally occurring respiratory events), genioglossus activity and its responsiveness to pharyngeal pressure during respiratory events, and markers of OSA severity were compared between conditions. Genioglossus movement patterns and upper airway anatomy were also assessed via magnetic resonance imaging in a subset of participants (n = 7) during wakefulness.

RESULTS

Zopiclone increased the respiratory arousal threshold versus placebo (-31.8 ± 5.6 versus -26.4 ± 4.6 cmH2O, P = 0.02) without impairing genioglossus muscle activity or its responsiveness to negative pharyngeal pressure during respiratory events (-0.56 ± 0.2 versus -0.44 ± 0.1 %max/-cmH2O, P = 0.48). There was substantial interindividual variability in the changes in OSA severity with zopiclone explained, at least in part, by differences in pathophysiological characteristics including body mass index, arousal threshold, and genioglossus movement patterns.

CONCLUSIONS

In a group of patients with predominantly severe OSA, zopiclone increased the arousal threshold without reducing genioglossus muscle activity or its responsiveness to negative pharyngeal pressure. These properties may be beneficial in some patients with OSA with certain pathophysiological characteristics but may worsen hypoxemia in others.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, http://www.anzctr.org.au, trial ID: ACTRN12614000364673.

Upper Airway Collapsibility (Pcrit) and Pharyngeal Dilator Muscle Activity are Sleep Stage Dependent

STUDY OBJECTIVES

An anatomically narrow/highly collapsible upper airway is the main cause of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Upper airway muscle activity contributes to airway patency and, like apnea severity, can be sleep stage dependent. Conversely, existing data derived from a small number of participants suggest that upper airway collapsibility, measured by the passive pharyngeal critical closing pressure (Pcrit) technique, is not sleep stage dependent. This study aimed to determine the effect of sleep stage on Pcrit and upper airway muscle activity in a larger cohort than previously tested.

METHODS

Pcrit and/or muscle data were obtained from 72 adults aged 20-64 y with and without OSA.Pcrit was determined via transient reductions in continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) during N2, slow wave sleep (SWS) and rapid eye movement (REM) sleep. Genioglossus and tensor palatini muscle activities were measured: (1) awake with and without CPAP, (2) during stable sleep on CPAP, and (3) in response to the CPAP reductions used to quantify Pcrit.

RESULTS

Pcrit was 4.9 ± 1.4 cmH2O higher (more collapsible) during REM versus SWS (P = 0.012), 2.3 ± 0.6 cmH2O higher during REM versus N2 (P < 0.001), and 1.6 ± 0.7 cmH2O higher in N2 versus SWS (P = 0.048). Muscle activity decreased from wakefulness to sleep and from SWS to N2 to REM sleep for genioglossus but not for tensor palatini. Pharyngeal muscle activity increased by ∼50% by breath 5 following CPAP reductions.

CONCLUSIONS

Upper airway collapsibility measured via the Pcrit technique and genioglossus muscle activity vary with sleep stage. These findings should be taken into account when performing and interpreting "passive" Pcrit measurements.

Functional role of neural injury in obstructive sleep apnea

The causes of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) are multifactorial. Neural injury affecting the upper airway muscles due to repetitive exposure to intermittent hypoxia and/or mechanical strain resulting from snoring and recurrent upper airway closure have been proposed to contribute to OSA disease progression. Multiple studies have demonstrated altered sensory and motor function in patients with OSA using a variety of neurophysiological and histological approaches. However, the extent to which the alterations contribute to impairments in upper airway muscle function, and thus OSA disease progression, remains uncertain. This brief review, primarily focused on data in humans, summarizes: (1) the evidence for upper airway sensorimotor injury in OSA and (2) current understanding of how these changes affect upper airway function and their potential to change OSA progression. Some unresolved questions including possible treatment targets are noted.