Aesthetic outcome of intermediate closure versus intermediate closure followed by 2-octyl cyanoacrylate: A randomized evaluator-blinded split-wound comparative effectiveness trial

BACKGROUND

Dermatologic surgeons are increasingly using surgical adhesives in their practice. Studies comparing sutured wounds to those that utilize a combination of suturing and skin adhesive have not been previously conducted.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the cosmetic outcome and patient wound care satisfaction of an intermediate suture closure with an intermediate suture closure followed by the application of 2-octyl cyanoacrylate (2-OCA).

METHODS

Fifty patients were enrolled in a randomized, evaluator-blinded, split-scar study. Following intermediate sutured closure of a surgical defect, one side of the wound was randomized to receive an additional application of 2-OCA. After 3 months, the scar was assessed using the POSAS tool and patients reported wound care preferences.

RESULTS

As the primary outcome measure, the mean sum of observer POSAS was 12.80 for sutured closure alone versus 12.40 for sutured closures followed by 2-OCA (P = .49).

LIMITATIONS

Single-center study of a relatively homogenous population.

CONCLUSION

Although there were no significant differences in scar cosmesis, both patients and observers tended to prefer the side with an additional application of 2-OCA in most POSAS components, in overall opinion, and in patient wound care satisfaction. Dermatologic surgeons may add this to their practice without sacrificing scar outcomes or patient satisfaction.

No Additional Benefits of Tissue Adhesives for Skin Closure in Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND

This systematic review is aimed to compare the performance of tissue adhesives (TA) as an adjunct or closure method with traditional wound closure methods for cutaneous closure in arthroplasty and evaluate whether they have any added benefits in terms of decreasing wound complications and increasing postoperative patient satisfaction.

METHODS

Cochrane Library, PubMed, and EMBASE were searched until February 2021. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing outcomes of TA with emphasis on skin closure time, in-hospital stay, complication rates, cosmetic scoring systems, and patient satisfaction scores (PSS) compared to subcuticular sutures (SCS) and skin staples (ST) in arthroplasty. The quality of RCTs was assessed using the National Institutes of Health quality assessment tool.

RESULTS

Ten RCTs were included. The pooled and the subgroup analysis revealed no significant difference in the wound infection rates, discharge rates, dehiscence rates, and PSS between TA (as an adjunct or closure method) and SCS or ST. TA (as an adjunct or closure method) was significantly (P < .00001) associated with a longer time to closure compared to ST and a shorter time compared to SCS as a closure method. Length of stay was comparable in all groups.

CONCLUSION

Using TA in combination with subcuticular sutures or ST or as a cutaneous method of closure does not provide additional benefits in terms of decreased hospital stay, decreased infection rates, or wound discharge rates. The PSS and pain scores of the scars also appear to be comparable to standard wound closure methods. No clear conclusion could be drawn regarding cosmetic scoring systems, because of the paucity of data.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I (Meta-analysis of RCTs).

Aesthetic outcome of simple cuticular suture distance from the wound edge on the closure of linear wounds on the head and neck: A randomized evaluator blinded split-wound comparative effect trial

BACKGROUND

Little data support the optimal distance of cuticular suture placement from the wound edge to achieve the most cosmetically appealing scar.

OBJECTIVE

To compare Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) scores for cutaneous sutures spaced 2 mm versus 5 mm from the wound edge in head and neck defects repaired via linear closure.

METHODS

Fifty patients were enrolled in this randomized, evaluator blinded, split-scar study. Surgical wounds were repaired with cuticular sutures 2 mm from the wound edge on one side and 5 mm on the other. POSAS scores and scar width were compared 3 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

The sum observer POSAS score for this study had a mean (SD) of 16.06 (6.49) on the 2-mm side and 15.82 (6.83) on the 5-mm side (P = .807). Similarly, no difference was seen between scar width with a mean (SD) of 0.100 cm (0.058 cm) on the 2-mm side and with mean (SD) 0.100 cm (0.076 cm) on the 5-mm side (P = .967).

LIMITATIONS

Linear repairs were studied on head and neck defects after extirpation of cutaneous malignancies, resulting in a homogeneous elderly white patient population.

CONCLUSION

Cuticular sutures placed 2 or 5 mm from the wound edge did not result in different cosmetic outcomes in linear closures on the head and neck.

Pediatric laparoscopy: Facts and factitious claims

Background:

Pediatric laparoscopy (LS) is claimed to be superior to open surgery (OS). This review questions the scientific veracity of this assertion by systematic analysis of published evidences comparing LS versus OS in infants and children.

Materials and Methods:

Search of PubMed data base and the available literature on pediatric LS is analyzed.

Results:

One hundred and eight articles out of a total of 426 papers were studied in detail.

Conclusions:

High quality evidences indicate that LS is, at the best, as invasive as OS; and is at the worst, more invasive than conventional surgery. There are no high quality evidences to suggest that LS is minimally invasive, economically profitable and is associated with fewer complications than OS. Evidences are equally distributed for and against the benefits of LS regarding postoperative pain. Proof of cosmetic superiority of LS or otherwise is not available. The author concludes that pediatric laparoscopy, at the best, is simply comparable to laparotomy and its superiority over the latter could not be sustained on the basis of available scientific evidences. Benefits of laparoscopy appear to recede with younger age. Concerns are raised on the quick adoption, undue promotion and frequent misuse of laparoscopy in children.