The Diabetes Prevention Program. Design and methods for a clinical trial in the prevention of type 2 diabetes

The Diabetes Prevention Program is a randomized clinical trial testing strategies to prevent or delay the development of type 2 diabetes in high-risk individuals with elevated fasting plasma glucose concentrations and impaired glucose tolerance. The 27 clinical centers in the U.S. are recruiting at least 3,000 participants of both sexes, approximately 50% of whom are minority patients and 20% of whom are > or = 65 years old, to be assigned at random to one of three intervention groups: an intensive lifestyle intervention focusing on a healthy diet and exercise and two masked medication treatment groups--metformin or placebo--combined with standard diet and exercise recommendations. Participants are being recruited during a 2 2/3-year period, and all will be followed for an additional 3 1/3 to 5 years after the close of recruitment to a common closing date in 2002. The primary outcome is the development of diabetes, diagnosed by fasting or post-challenge plasma glucose concentrations meeting the 1997 American Diabetes Association criteria. The 3,000 participants will provide 90% power to detect a 33% reduction in an expected diabetes incidence rate of at least 6.5% per year in the placebo group. Secondary outcomes include cardiovascular disease and its risk factors; changes in glycemia, beta-cell function, insulin sensitivity, obesity, diet, physical activity, and health-related quality of life; and occurrence of adverse events. A fourth treatment group--troglitazone combined with standard diet and exercise recommendations--was included initially but discontinued because of the liver toxicity of the drug. This randomized clinical trial will test the possibility of preventing or delaying the onset of type 2 diabetes in individuals at high risk.

Nonsteroidal estrogens of dietary origin: possible roles in hormone-dependent disease

Equol, a nonsteroidal estrogen of dietary origin, was recently identified in human urine, and is excreted in amounts comparable to the classical steroidal estrogens. We confirm here that phytoestrogens which are abundant in dietary soya protein are converted by human gastrointestinal flora to this weak estrogen. After the ingestion of meals containing cooked soya protein the urinary excretion of equol in four of six subjects studied increased by up to 1000-fold and this compound was the major phenolic compound found in the urine. These data also indicate that some subjects are unable to either produce or excrete equol despite the challenge of a diet containing soya. In view of the increasing use of commercial soya products in the diet and the capacity of human bacterial flora to synthesize this weak estrogen from the abundance of phytoestrogens in soya, the potential relevance of these observations to the diseases implicating steroid hormones is discussed.

Induction of solid tumor differentiation by the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma ligand troglitazone in patients with liposarcoma

Agonist ligands for the nuclear receptor peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma have been shown to induce terminal differentiation of normal preadipocytes and human liposarcoma cells in vitro. Because the differentiation status of liposarcoma is predictive of clinical outcomes, modulation of the differentiation status of a tumor may favorably impact clinical behavior. We have conducted a clinical trial for treatment of patients with advanced liposarcoma by using the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma ligand troglitazone, in which extensive correlative laboratory studies of tumor differentiation were performed. We report here the results of three patients with intermediate to high-grade liposarcomas in whom troglitazone administration induced histologic and biochemical differentiation in vivo. Biopsies of tumors from each of these patients while on troglitazone demonstrated histologic evidence of extensive lipid accumulation by tumor cells and substantial increases in NMR-detectable tumor triglycerides compared with pretreatment biopsies. In addition, expression of several mRNA transcripts characteristic of differentiation in the adipocyte lineage was induced. There was also a marked reduction in immunohistochemical expression of Ki-67, a marker of cell proliferation. Together, these data indicate that terminal adipocytic differentiation was induced in these malignant tumors by troglitazone. These results indicate that lineage-appropriate differentiation can be induced pharmacologically in a human solid tumor.

Effect of troglitazone in insulin-treated patients with type II diabetes mellitus. Troglitazone and Exogenous Insulin Study Group

BACKGROUND

Troglitazone is a new oral antidiabetic drug that increases the sensitivity of peripheral tissues to insulin. It may therefore increase the efficacy of exogenous insulin in patients with insulin-resistant diabetes mellitus.

METHODS

We studied the effect of troglitazone or placebo in 350 patients with poorly controlled non-insulin-dependent (type 2) diabetes mellitus (glycosylated hemoglobin values, 8 to 12 percent; normal, 4.3 to 6.1 percent) despite therapy with at least 30 U of insulin daily. The patients were randomly assigned to receive 200 mg of troglitazone (116 patients), 600 mg of troglitazone (116 patients), or placebo (118 patients) daily for 26 weeks. Insulin doses were not increased and were reduced only to prevent hypoglycemia. Glycosylated hemoglobin, serum glucose while fasting, serum total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and triglycerides were measured 5 times during an 8-week base-line period and 10 times during the 26-week treatment period. Daily insulin doses were recorded during both periods.

RESULTS

Ninety percent of the patients completed the study. The adjusted mean glycosylated hemoglobin values decreased by 0.8 and 1.4 percentage points, respectively, in the group given 200 mg of troglitazone and the group given 600 mg of troglitazone, and fasting serum glucose concentrations decreased by 35 and 49 mg per deciliter (1.9 and 2.7 mmol per liter), respectively, despite decreases in the insulin dose of 11 percent and 29 percent (P<0.001 for all comparisons with the placebo group). Serum total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations increased slightly and serum triglyceride concentrations decreased slightly in the troglitazone-treated patients.

CONCLUSIONS

When given in conjunction with insulin, troglitazone improves glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Enhancement of insulin sensitivity by troglitazone lowers blood pressure in diabetic hypertensives

The association of hypertension with insulin resistance has been reported. Troglitazone (CS-045) is a newly developed antidiabetic agent that enhances insulin sensitivity. Its antidiabetic effects have been confirmed in diabetic animals and patients. The present study was performed to evaluate whether the amelioration of hyperinsulinemia by troglitazone lowers blood pressure in essential hypertensives. Troglitazone was administered orally to 18 outpatients with essential hypertension complicated by mild diabetes at a dose of 200 mg twice a day for 8 weeks. Blood pressure was decreased from 164 +/- 3/94 +/- 2 mm Hg to 146 +/- 3 (P < .001)/82 +/- 3 (P < .05) mm Hg at 8 weeks of the treatment period. Pulse rate did not change. Fasting plasma glucose changed from 159 +/- 10 mg/dL to 144 +/- 14 mg/dL at 8 weeks (P < .05). Plasma insulin (IRI) levels changes from 9.1 +/- 1.2 microU/mL to 6.3 +/- 0.8 microU/mL at the endpoint of treatment (P < .1). Decrease in mean blood pressure from the control period to the endpoint of the treatment correlated significantly with decrease in IRI (r = 0.59, P < .05). In summary, troglitazone treatment induces improvement in both glucose metabolism and blood pressure control in essential hypertensive patients with diabetes mellitus. These results suggest that insulin resistance or plasma insulin level plays a role in the pathogenesis of essential hypertension.

Efficacy and safety of troglitazone in the treatment of lipodystrophy syndromes

BACKGROUND

Troglitazone promotes adipocyte differentiation in vitro and increases insulin sensitivity in vivo. Therefore, troglitazone may have therapeutic benefit in lipoatrophic diabetes.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether troglitazone ameliorates hyperglycemia and hypertriglyceridemia or increases fat mass in lipoatrophic patients.

DESIGN

Open-labeled prospective study.

SETTING

United States and Canada.

PATIENTS

20 patients with various syndromes associated with lipoatrophy or lipodystrophy.

INTERVENTION

6 months of therapy with troglitazone, 200 to 600 mg/d.

MEASUREMENTS

Levels of hemoglobin A1c triglycerides, free fatty acids, and insulin; respiratory quotient; percentage of body fat; liver volume; and regional fat mass.

RESULTS

In the 13 patients with diabetes who completed 6 months of troglitazone therapy, hemoglobin A1c levels decreased by a mean of 2.8% (95% CI, 1.9% to 3.7%; P < 0.001). In all 19 study patients, fasting triglyceride levels decreased by 2.6 mmol/L (230 mg/dL) (CI, 0.7 to 4.5 mmol/L [62 to 398 mg/dL]; P = 0.019) and free fatty acid levels decreased by 325 micromol/L (CI, 135 to 515 micromol/L; P = 0.035). The respiratory quotient decreased by a mean of 0.12 (CI, 0.08 to 0.16; P < 0.001), suggesting that troglitazone promoted oxidation of fat. Body fat increased by a mean of 2.4 percentage points (CI, 1.3 to 4.5 percentage points; P = 0.044). Magnetic resonance imaging showed an increase in subcutaneous adipose tissue but not in visceral fat. In one patient, the serum alanine aminotransferase level increased eightfold during the 10th months of troglitazone treatment but normalized 3 months after discontinuation of treatment Liver biopsy revealed an eosinophilic infiltrate, suggesting hypersensitivity reaction as a cause of hepatotoxicity.

CONCLUSION

Troglitazone therapy improved metabolic control and increased body fat in patients with lipoatrophic diabetes. The substantial benefits of troglitazone must be balanced against the risk for hepatotoxicity, which can occur relatively late in the treatment course.

Use of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) gamma ligand troglitazone as treatment for refractory breast cancer: a phase II study

PURPOSE

To evaluate the therapeutic effects of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) gamma activating ligand, troglitazone, in patients with refractory metastatic breast cancer.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Patients with advanced breast cancer refractory to at least one chemotherapy regimen (ER negative tumors) or two hormonal regimens (ER positive tumors) were treated with troglitazone at 800 mg p.o. QD until disease progression, to determine the percentage of patients free of progression at 6 months. Tumor response, toxicity, and changes in serum tumor markers (CEA, CA27.29) that might reflect alteration in tumor differentiation, were also examined.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients were enrolled before suspension of protocol accrual and treatment when troglitazone was withdrawn from commercial availability following FDA warnings on hepatic toxicity. No objective responses (CR or PR) were observed; only three patients had SD at 8 weeks. Patients came off study for PD (16), DLT (1), FDA withdrawal (2), or other (3) reasons. No patients took troglitazone for more than 20 weeks; all had experienced disease progression or began other systemic therapy within 6 months. All patients with elevated serum tumor markers (CEA and CA27.29) at baseline had rising tumor markers within 8 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

While clinical trials among different patient populations might uncover subtle effects on tumor differentiation, PPARgamma activation by troglitazone has little apparent clinical value among patients with treatment-refractory metastatic breast cancer.

Lessons from the glitazones: a story of drug development

Troglitazone, the first in the thiazolidinedione class of oral hypoglycaemic agents, was launched in the USA in March, 1997. It reached Europe later that year, only to be withdrawn within weeks on the grounds of liver toxicity. Meanwhile it went on to generate sales of over $2 billion in the USA, and caused at least 90 cases of liver failure (70 resulting in death or transplantation) before it was withdrawn in March, 2000. Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone reached the US market in 1999 as first-line agents to be used alone or in combination with other drugs, but in Europe the same dossiers were used one year later to apply for a limited licence as second-line agents restricted to oral combination therapy. How should we use the glitazones? And how did they achieve blockbuster status without any clear evidence of advantage over existing therapy?

Drug-induced hepatotoxicity: 2005

The removal from the marketplace of several widely prescribed drugs due to hepatotoxicity has attracted considerable attention. Now under extensive review are means by which we can better identify hepatic risk prior to federal approval. Assessment of risk-to-benefit ratios regarding a novel agent with hepatotoxicity issues (especially one for a life-threatening condition) requires considerable judgment and education on the part of prescribers and patients. The spectrum of drug-induced liver injury is broad with simulation of almost all unknown liver disorders. Drug-induced liver injuries often have a somewhat characteristic signature, as regards type of injury (hepatocellular vs cholestatic) and time of onset. The diagnosis of drug-induced liver injury is often one of exclusion with initial suspicion based on circumstantial evidence. Factors affecting susceptibility to drug-induced injury include age, sex, concomitant use of other drugs, and genetic polymorphism in metabolic pathways involved in activation or disposition of therapeutic drugs. Drug-drug interactions present particular problems in patients, often elderly, who are receiving several drugs simultaneously. Mechanisms of drug-induced liver injury are many and varied. With many drugs, intermediary products produced during metabolism are highly reactive and toxic. In these situations, the balance between the rate of production of the metabolite and the effectiveness of the drug may determine whether or not hepatic injury occurs.

Hepatotoxicity due to troglitazone: report of two cases and review of adverse events reported to the United States Food and Drug Administration

Two patients (a 48-year-old woman and a 62-year-old man) developed clinical and laboratory signs of hepatotoxicity due to troglitazone (Rezulin), a thiazolidinedione used in treatment of diabetes mellitus. There was no clear clinical evidence of drug allergy, although the woman experienced colitis before the onset of recognized hepatotoxicity. Liver biopsies showed bridging necrosis and fibrosis in the woman and hepatitis with granuloma formation in the man. The abnormalities in liver chemistries resolved promptly upon cessation of the drug. Cases involving 46 patients reported to the United States Food and Drug Administration are also reviewed. Troglitazone is a useful new oral antihyperglycemic agent, but in about 1.9% of patients hepatotoxicity has occurred, which may be severe and even fatal. Frequent monitoring of serum liver chemistries in patients taking the drug is essential.

Diabetic KKAy mice exhibit increased hepatic PPARgamma1 gene expression and develop hepatic steatosis upon chronic treatment with antidiabetic thiazolidinediones

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma, which is involved in the regulation of lipid homeostasis, is upregulated in the liver of obese and diabetic mice, but the biological consequences of this induction are largely unknown. This study was aimed at further characterizing this upregulation and exploring the downstream biological effects of specific activators on hepatic lipid metabolism.

METHODS

Hepatic expression of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma1 and gamma2 mRNA and protein was analyzed by real-time polymerase chain reaction and Western immunoblotting in KKAy mice and ob/ob mice. KKAy mice were treated with thiazolidinediones, and hepatic triglyceride content and lipid distribution were analyzed biochemically and by histopathology.

RESULTS

KKAy mice exhibited a marked increase in hepatic peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma1 mRNA and protein levels, whereas the gamma2 isoform was upregulated in ob/ob mice. Treatment of KKAy mice with troglitazone or rosiglitazone resulted in severe microvesicular periacinar steatosis, whereas lean control mice did not develop any pathological liver changes. Hepatic triglyceride levels, however, were not altered by the treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

In mice with obesity-associated upregulated hepatic peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma expression, thiazolidinediones may produce hepatic steatosis. Under pathophysiological conditions, such as non-insulin-dependent diabetes, the liver may thus become sensitized towards peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma-activating drugs.

Differential effects of metformin and troglitazone on cardiovascular risk factors in patients with type 2 diabetes

OBJECTIVE

Traditional cardiovascular risk factors (CVRF) only partly explain the excessive risk of cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes. There is now an increasing appreciation for many novel CVRF that occur largely as a result of insulin resistance and hyperinsulinemia. Therefore, we investigated whether diabetes medications that vary in their mechanism of action and ability to reduce insulin resistance may differ in their effects on both traditional and novel CVRF.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We compared the addition of metformin or troglitazone therapy on CVRF in 22 subjects with type 2 diabetes who remained in poor glycemic control (with HbA1c >8.5%) while taking glyburide 10 mg twice daily. Subjects were initially randomized to either metformin 850 mg once daily or troglitazone 200 mg once daily. Both medications were then titrated upward as needed to achieve fasting plasma glucose <120 mg/dl. Measures of glucose control, insulin resistance, and CVRF (blood pressure, lipids, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1, C-reactive protein, fibrinogen, and small dense LDL) were assessed both before and after therapy.

RESULTS

After 4 months of treatment, both metformin and troglitazone led to similar decreases in fasting plasma glucose and HbA1c. The reduction in insulin resistance determined by hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp was nearly twofold greater with troglitazone than metformin. Metformin did not induce significant changes in blood pressure, LDL cholesterol, LDL size, HDL cholesterol, triglycerides, or plasminogen activator inhibitor-1. However, C-reactive protein did decrease by 33% (6 +/- 1 to 4 +/- 1 mg/l; P < 0.01) [corrected]. Troglitazone therapy was associated with increases in LDL size (26.21 +/- 0.22 to 26.56 +/- 0.25 nm; P=0.04) and HDL cholesterol (33 +/- 3 to 36 +/- 3 mg/dl; P=0.05) and decreases in triglycerides (197 +/- 19 to 155 +/- 23 mg/dl; P=0.07) and C-reactive protein by 60% (8 +/- 3 to 3 +/- 1 mg/l, P < 0.01) [corrected].

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with type 2 diabetes in whom maximal sulfonylurea therapy failed, the addition of the insulin sensitizer troglitazone seemed to have greater benefits on several traditional and novel CVRF than metformin therapy. These differences were not related to glycemic improvement but reflected, in part, the greater reduction in insulin resistance obtained with addition of troglitazone. These data suggest that medications that more effectively address this underlying metabolic defect may be more beneficial in reducing cardiovascular risk in type 2 diabetes.

Troglitazone-induced hepatic failure leading to liver transplantation. A case report

BACKGROUND

Troglitazone is a new drug for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Although mild liver injury occurred in 1.9% of participants in controlled trials, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has received reports of five postmarketing cases of severe liver disease that resulted in death or liver transplantation.

OBJECTIVE

To report the clinical and histopathologic characteristics of a patient with troglitazone-associated severe liver injury leading to transplantation.

DESIGN

Case report.

SETTING

Two university hospitals.

PATIENT

A 55-year-old woman taking troglitazone, 400 mg/d, and insulin, 120 U/d.

INTERVENTION

Discontinuation of troglitazone therapy, pretransplantation liver biopsy, and liver transplantation.

RESULTS

Early nonspecific symptoms were attributed to other causes and were not evaluated. After the patient had used troglitazone for 3.5 months, massive loss of liver parenchyma and symptoms of liver failure developed, necessitating liver transplantation.

CONCLUSION

Troglitazone may cause subfulminant liver failure.

Troglitazone-induced liver failure: a case study

BACKGROUND

Troglitazone was removed from the U.S. market because its use was associated with an increased risk of liver failure. We evaluated the clinical features of all cases reported to the Food and Drug Administration and estimated the duration and magnitude of the risk of liver failure associated with continued use of the drug.

METHODS

Data from cases of liver failure associated with troglitazone use were abstracted and analyzed. The extent of troglitazone use was determined from national marketing data, and the duration of use was estimated with data from a large, multistate, health care company. Survival analysis was performed to estimate monthly incidence rates and the cumulative risk of liver failure.

RESULTS

Ninety-four cases of liver failure (89 acute, 5 chronic) were reported. Of the acute cases, 58 (67%) were women and only 11 (13%) recovered without liver transplantation. Progression from normal hepatic functioning to irreversible liver injury occurred within 1 month in 19 patients who were indistinguishable clinically from the 70 patients who had an unknown time course to irreversibility, except for the post hoc observation that prior cholecystectomy was less common in those with rapid onset. The incidence of liver failure was elevated from the first through at least the 26th month of troglitazone use. Accounting for case underreporting, the number needed to harm from troglitazone use was between 600 to 1500 patients at 26 months.

CONCLUSION

The progression to irreversible liver injury probably occurred within a 1-month interval in most patients, casting doubt on the value of monthly monitoring of serum aminotransferase levels as a means of preventing troglitazone-induced acute liver failure. The cumulative risk of hepatic failure increased with continued use.

A phase II study of troglitazone, an activator of the PPARgamma receptor, in patients with chemotherapy-resistant metastatic colorectal cancer

PURPOSE

Troglitazone, a potent activator of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma, induces tumor differentiation in human liposarcomas and causes regression of tumors that are derived from human colon cancer cells in nude mice. We therefore assessed the efficacy of troglitazone in the treatment of metastatic colon cancer in humans.

METHODS

Twenty-five patients with metastatic colorectal cancer were treated with oral troglitazone. Patients were followed up for evidence of toxicity, tumor response, and survival.

RESULTS

The treatment was well tolerated: no grade 3/4 treatment-related toxicities were observed. However, no objective tumor responses were noted, and all 25 patients had progressive disease as their best response to therapy. The median progression-free survival time was only 1.6 months, and the median survival time was 3.9 months.

DISCUSSION

Troglitazone is not an active agent for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.

The effects of troglitazone, an insulin-sensitizing agent, on the endothelial function in early and late type 2 diabetes: a placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial

Activation of the peroxisome proliferator-activator receptor gamma (PPARgamma) improves insulin resistance and glycemic control in patients with diabetes. As PPARgamma is expressed in the endothelial cell, we have investigated the effect of troglitazone, a PPARgamma activator, on the endothelial function in people with type 2 diabetes in a 12-week, prospective, randomized, double-blinded clinical trial. We studied 87 type 2 diabetic patients who were divided into 3 groups. Group A consisted of 27 patients with recently diagnosed diabetes and no clinical manifestations of macrovascular disease; group B, 29 patients with long-term diabetes and no clinically evident macrovascular disease; and group C, 31 diabetic patients with documented macrovascular disease (cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, or peripheral vascular disease). High-resolution ultrasound images were used to measure the flow-mediated dilation (FMD, endothelium-dependent) and nitroglycerin-induced dilation (NID, endothelium-independent) in the brachial artery. Laser Doppler perfusion imaging was used to measure vasodilation in the forearm skin in response to iontophoresis of 1% acetylcholine (Ach, endothelium-dependent) and 1% sodium nitroprusside (NaNP, endothelium-independent). The plasma concentrations of von Willebrand factor (vWF), soluble intercellular adhesion molecule (sICAM), and soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule (sVCAM) were also measured as indicators of endothelial cell activation. The FMD improved in the troglitazone-treated patients in group A (7.72 +/- 3.4 v 5.27 +/- 2.0, P <.05 [exit visit v baseline, percent of increase in brachial artery diameter, mean +/- SD]). The fasting insulin level also improved in this group (15.6 +/- 10 v 19.7 +/- 10, P <.05) and was strongly correlated to changes in FMD (r = -.73, P <.01). No changes were found in the FMD or the fasting insulin levels in the troglitazone-treated patients in groups B or C. The NID was not changed by troglitazone treatment in any of the 3 groups. Also, no differences were found in the microcirculation reactivity measurements or in the biochemical markers of endothelial dysfunction in all 3 groups. A small, but significant, improvement of the FMD was found in placebo-treated patients in group B, probably related to the low FMD levels at baseline in the patients (5.40 +/- 3.0 v 4.36 +/- 2.4, P <.05). We concluded that troglitazone treatment for 12 weeks improved endothelial function in the macrocirculation of patients with recently diagnosed type 2 diabetes and no clinical evidence of macrovascular disease. This improvement was strongly associated with the improvement of fasting plasma insulin concentrations.

A study to survey susceptible genetic factors responsible for troglitazone-associated hepatotoxicity in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Troglitazone is a 2,4-thiazolidinedione antidiabetic agent with insulin-sensitizing activities. This agent had been used efficiently in a large number of patients but was withdrawn from the market in March 2000 because of its association with idiosyncratic hepatotoxicity. To address the susceptible genetic factors responsible for the hepatotoxicity associated with this agent, we performed a genetic polymorphic analysis by a target gene approach in troglitazone-treated Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

METHODS

One hundred ten patients treated with troglitazone were recruited into this study. The case patients (n = 25) were recruited through medical professionals who had previously reported abnormal increases in the levels of ALT or AST among their patients. The control patients (n = 85) were recruited through physicians prescribing troglitazone. For statistical accuracy, efforts were made to maximize the size of the case group. Genotype analysis was performed in 68 polymorphic sites of 51 candidate genes related to drug metabolism, apoptosis, roduction and elimination of reactive oxygen species, and signal transduction pathways of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma 2 and insulin.

RESULTS

The strong correlation with transaminase elevations was observed in the combined glutathione-S-transferase GSTT1-GSTM1 null genotype (odds ratio, 3.692; 95% confidence interval, 1.354-10.066; P =.008).

CONCLUSIONS

The double null mutation of GSTT1 and GSTM1 might influence troglitazone-associated abnormal increases of liver enzyme levels.

Effects of troglitazone: a new hypoglycemic agent in patients with NIDDM poorly controlled by diet therapy

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the clinical efficacy of troglitazone, a newly developed oral hypoglycemic agent, in patients with NIDDM.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

There were 284 NIDDM patients (20-82 years of age) whose glycemic control while on a diet was judged stable but was judged unsatisfactory (fasting plasma glucose [FPG] > or = 8.3 mmol/l) when entered into a multicenter and double-blind study with parallel groups study. They were randomly allocated into two groups, the troglitazone group (the T group: 400 mg/day p.o.) and the placebo group (the P group), and were treated with test drugs for 12 weeks.

RESULTS

We evaluated efficacy in 136 patients of the T group and 126 patients of the P group. There was no significant difference in any of baseline characteristics between the T and P groups. In the T group, FPG and HbA1c decreased significantly after treatment (before versus after, FPG 10.1 +/- 1.6 vs. 8.8 +/- 1.9 mmol/l, P < 0.001; HbA1c: 8.6 +/- 1.5 vs 8.1 +/- 1.7%, P < 0.001). FPG and HbA1c did not change after treatment in the P group (before versus after, FPG 10.1 +/- 1.8 vs. 9.9 +/- 2.1 mmol/l; HbA1c 8.5 +/- 1.5 vs. 8.6 +/- 1.6%). Of 136 patients in the T group, 62 (45.6%) were classified as responders. Serum triglyceride level also decreased in the T group but not in the P group. Body weight increased slightly only in the T group. There were no differences in changes in blood pressure between the two groups. No serious adverse events occurred in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

Troglitazone at 400 mg/day decreased FPG and HbA1c significantly in NIDDM patients who had failed to respond to diet therapy. Troglitazone, developed as a drug to enhance insulin action, can be a useful hypoglycemic agent for the treatment of NIDDM.

Liver enzyme monitoring in patients treated with troglitazone

CONTEXT

Soon after initial marketing in March 1997, troglitazone, the first thiazolidinedione antidiabetic agent, was found to cause life-threatening acute liver failure. The drug was removed from the market in March 2000.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) risk management efforts, including repeated labeling changes and "Dear Healthcare Professional" letters, on periodic liver enzyme monitoring of patients taking troglitazone.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Claims data from a large, multistate managed care organization were used to establish 4 cohorts of patients (N = 7603) with at least 90 days of health plan enrollment before first troglitazone prescription during 4 consecutive periods spanning April 1997 to September 1999 and representing 4 progressively stringent liver monitoring recommendations.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Percentage of eligible troglitazone users in each cohort with baseline, monthly (for up to 6 months of continuous use), and complete (baseline and monthly) enzyme monitoring, based on computerized records of laboratory claims.

RESULTS

Baseline testing increased from 15% before any FDA monitoring recommendations (cohort 1) to 44.6% following 4 separate FDA interventions (cohort 4; P<.001). In cohort 4, 33.4% of users had follow-up testing after 1 month of therapy, falling to 13% after 5 months of continuous use. In all cohorts, less than 5% received all recommended liver enzyme tests by the third month of continuous use.

CONCLUSIONS

The FDA risk management efforts did not achieve meaningful or sustained improvement in liver enzyme testing. Evaluation of the impact of regulatory actions is needed before such actions can be regarded as effective or sufficient.

TRIPOD (TRoglitazone In the Prevention Of Diabetes): a randomized, placebo-controlled trial of troglitazone in women with prior gestational diabetes mellitus

The TRoglitazone In the Prevention Of Diabetes (TRIPOD) trial is a single-center, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-masked study. The primary aim of the TRIPOD trial is to test the hypothesis that chronic administration of troglitazone to nondiabetic women with prior gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) will improve whole-body insulin sensitivity and reduce the incidence of non-insulin-dependent diabetes (NIDDM). Because troglitazone is already known to lower blood glucose concentrations in persons who have developed NIDDM, an additional aim of the project will be to determine whether early intervention with troglitazone will achieve better final glycemic control than can be achieved by later intervention. In addition, since troglitazone treatment is expected to improve insulin sensitivity and may prevent or delay a decline in glucose tolerance, we also plan to determine whether long-term troglitazone treatment alters the development or progression of atherosclerosis. In this article we describe the experiment's design, the study's endpoints and methods for determining those endpoints, methods for assessing quality of life, and proposed methods for statistical analyses. The unique two-phase study design of the TRIPOD trial will permit testing not only of the biological question about reversal of insulin resistance and prevention of diabetes, but also of the clinical question about whether early intervention is superior to late intervention. Results from this trial will have an important impact on the monitoring and treatment of patients at high risk for NIDDM.

Hepatotoxicity with thiazolidinediones: is it a class effect?

Decreased insulin sensitivity plays a major role in various human diseases. particularly type 2 diabetes mellitus, and is associated with a higher risk of atherosclerosis and cardiovascular complications. Thiazolidinediones, more commonly termed glitazones, are the first drugs to specifically target muscular insulin resistance. They have proven efficacy for reducing plasma glucose levels in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus treated with diet alone, sulphonylureas, metformin or insulin. In addition, they are associated with some improvement of the cardiovascular risk profile. However, troglitazone, the first compound approved by the Food and Drug Administration in the US, proved to be hepatotoxic and was withdrawn from the market after the report of several dozen deaths or cases of severe hepatic failure requiring liver transplantation. It remains unclear whether or not hepatotoxicity is a class effect or is related to unique properties of troglitazone. Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone, two other glitazones, appear to have similar efficacy with regard to blood glucose control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus as compared with troglitazone. In controlled clinical trials, the incidence of significant (> or =3 x upper limit of normal) increases in liver enzyme levels (ALT in particular) was similar with rosiglitazone or pioglitazone as compared with placebo, whereas troglitazone was associated with a 3-fold greater incidence. In contrast to the numerous case reports of acute liver failure in patients receiving troglitzone, only a few case reports of hepatotoxicity have been reported in patients treated with rosiglitazone until now, with a causal relationship remaining uncertain. Furthermore, no single case of severe hepatotoxicity has been reported yet with pioglitazone. It should be mentioned that troglitazone, unlike pioglitazone and rosiglitazone, induces the cytochrome P450 isoform 3A4, which is partly responsible for its metabolism, and may be prone to drug interactions. Importantly enough, obesity, insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes mellitus are associated with liver abnormalities, especially non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, independent of any pharmacological treatment. This association obviously complicates the selection of patients who are good candidates for a treatment with glitazones as well as the monitoring of liver tests after initiation of therapy with any thiazolidinedione compound. While regular monitoring of liver enzymes is still recommended and more long term data are desirable, current evidence from clinical trials and postmarketing experience in the US supports the conclusion that rosiglitazone and pioglitazone do not share the hepatotoxic profile of troglitazone.