Induction of human cutaneous mast cell degranulation by opiates and endogenous opioid peptides: evidence for opiate and nonopiate receptor participation

In order to examine the capacity of pharmacologically useful opiates to stimulate human mast cell secretion, subjects were skin tested with morphine, codeine, or meperidine hydrochloride. All three agents acted equipotently in eliciting positive immediate skin reactions from all subjects tested. Each agent demonstrated 10 mm of net whealing at 5 to 10 micrograms base (16.7 to 40.4 nmol) injected intradermally. The ability to elicit immediate skin test reactions with endogenous opioid peptides was examined with the use of dynorphin, [D-Ala, 2-D-Leu5] enkephalin, beta-endorphin, and morphiceptin . All four compounds induced wheal-and-flare reactions with the order of potency: dynorphin, greater than beta-endorphin, and greater than [D-Ala, 2-D-Leu5] enkephalin approximately equal to morphiceptin at dose ranges of 0.3 to 8.45 nmol. The inhibition of reactivity by hydroxyzine and the demonstration of mast cell degranulation by electron microscopy suggest that the immediate skin responses to opioid stimulation occur as a consequence of mast cell degranulation. Experiments with the opioid receptor antagonist, naloxone, suggest that both opioid and nonopioid receptors may be involved. These results imply that endogenous opioid peptides possibly may play a role in mast cell function and/or degradulation .

Prevalence of IgE antibodies to morphine. Relation to the high and low incidences of NMBA anaphylaxis in Norway and Sweden, respectively

BACKGROUND

Anaphylactic reactions to a neuromuscular blocking agent (NMBA) is more than six times as common in Norway as in Sweden, probably due to differences in preoperative sensitization. The prevalence of IgE-sensitization to morphine (MOR) and suxamethonium (SUX) in comparable populations in Bergen, Norway, and Stockholm, Sweden, was studied and related to possible sensitizing agents.

METHODS

Three hundred sera of 'allergics' and 500 blood donors in Bergen and Stockholm were tested for IgE antibodies to MOR and SUX using Pharmacia Diagnostics ImmunoCAP(Uppsala, Sweden) assay and the results compared to those of 65 patients from Bergen with documented anaphylaxis to NMBA. In addition, 84 different household chemicals were tested, by IgE antibody inhibition, for SUX and MOR.

RESULTS

In Norway 0.4% of blood donors, 3.7% of allergics and 38.5% of anaphylactics were IgE-sensitized to SUX, and 5.0, 10.0 and 66.7%, respectively, to MOR. No serum from Sweden was positive. The majority of those sensitized (69%) were women. Several household chemicals contained SUX and/or MOR activity, but the only difference between Norway and Sweden was cough mixtures containing pholcodine (PHO). IgE antibodies to PHO were present in 6.0% of blood donors from Norway and in no serum from Sweden. Of the anaphylactics, 65-68% were sensitized to MOR or PHO but only 39% to SUX.

CONCLUSIONS

IgE-sensitization to SUX, MOR and PHO was detected in Norway but not in Sweden. One possible explanation is the unrestricted use of cough mixtures containing MOR derivatives in Norway.

Immunoglobulin E Antibodies to Rocuronium

Background

Diagnosis of allergy from neuromuscular blocking agents is not always straightforward. The objectives of the current study were to investigate the value of quantification of immunoglobulin E (IgE) by ImmunoCAP (Phadia AB, Uppsala, Sweden) in the diagnosis of rocuronium allergy and to study whether IgE inhibition tests can predict clinical cross-reactivity between neuromuscular blocking agents.

Methods

Twenty-five rocuronium-allergic patients and 30 control individuals exposed to rocuronium during uneventful anesthesia were included. Thirty-two sera (total IgE > 1,500 kU/l) were analyzed for potential interference of elevated total IgE titers. Results were compared with quantification of IgE for suxamethonium, morphine, and pholcodine. Cross-reactivity between drugs was assessed by IgE inhibition and skin tests.

Results

Sensitivity of IgE for rocuronium, suxamethonium, morphine, and pholcodine was 68, 60, 88, and 86%, respectively. Specificity was 100% for suxamethonium, morphine, and pholcodine IgE and 93% for rocuronium IgE. ROC analysis between patients and control individuals changed the threshold to 0.13 kUa/l for rocuronium, 0.11 kUa/l for suxamethonium, 0.36 kUa/l for morphine, and 0.43 kUa/l for pholcodine. Corresponding sensitivity was 92, 72, 88, and 86%, respectively. Specificity was unaltered. Interference of elevated total IgE with quantification of IgE was demonstrated by the analysis in sera with a total IgE greater than 1,500 kU/l. IgE inhibition did not predict clinical relevant cross-reactivity.

Conclusions

The rocuronium ImmunoCAP constitutes a reliable technique to diagnose rocuronium allergy, provided an assay-specific decision threshold is applied. IgE assays based on compounds bearing ammonium epitopes are confirmed to represent reliable tools to diagnose rocuronium allergy. High total IgE titers were observed to affect specificity of the assays.

Opiate-sensitivity: clinical characteristics and the role of skin prick testing

BACKGROUND

The value of skin prick testing in opiate-sensitive individuals is uncertain as opiates cause non-specific weals by direct degranulation of mast cells.

OBJECTIVE

To define whether skin prick test (SPT) responses to opiates in opiate-sensitive individuals are different to those seen in the normal population and to describe the clinical characteristics of this group of subjects.

METHODS

The SPT responses of eight opiate-sensitive subjects to morphine 10 mg/mL, pethidine (meperidine) 50 mg/mL and papaveretum 15.4 mg/mL at four different concentrations (undiluted, 1/10, 1/50 and 1/100) were compared with the responses of 100 (32 atopic) non-opiate-sensitive control subjects. Four of the opiate-sensitive subjects had a clinical history of asthma, rhinitis or urticaria on occupational exposure to morphine. One subject developed urticaria with codeine, one developed urticaria and asthma with morphine and diamorphine and two subjects reacted to intravenous papaveretum with anaphylaxis or urticaria. Five out of the eight cases had opiate sensitivity confirmed by single-blind placebo-controlled oral challenge.

RESULTS

Skin prick tests to all three opiates were not significantly different when the eight opiate-sensitive subjects were compared with either the entire normal control group or the subgroup of 47 definite opiate-tolerant controls that had previously received opiates for clinical indications. Furthermore, there were no significant differences in size of opiate SPT responses between atopic and non-atopic control subjects. In the control subjects, there was a positive correlation in SPT weal size between the three opiates.

CONCLUSION

Skin prick testing is not useful in the diagnosis of opiate sensitivity and placebo-controlled challenge should be considered.

One-step homogeneous immunoassay for small analytes

We have developed a one-step, homogeneous noncompetitive immunoassay for small analytes using recombinant antibodies and morphine as the model analyte. A highly specific antibody against the immune complex (IC) formed between an anti-morphine antibody and morphine was selected from a naive scFv phage display library. The in vitro phage library selection procedure avoids the difficulties associated with the production of anti-IC antibodies by animal immunization. The anti-morphine and the anti-IC antibodies were labeled with a pair of fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) fluorophores. In the FRET assay the labeled antibodies were incubated with saliva samples spiked with morphine, codeine, or heroin. Within 2 min, 5 ng/mL morphine, which is clearly under the recommended cutoff level, was detected without cross-reactivity to codeine or heroin. This assay principle is also widely applicable to other small analytes.

National pholcodine consumption and prevalence of IgE-sensitization: a multicentre study

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to test, on a multinational level, the pholcodine (PHO) hypothesis, i.e. that the consumption of PHO-containing cough mixtures could cause higher prevalence of IgE antibodies to PHO, morphine (MOR) and suxamethonium (SUX). As a consequence the risk of anaphylaxis to neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBA) will be increased.

METHODS

National PHO consumptions were derived from the United Nations International Narcotics Control Board (INCB) database. IgE and IgE antibodies to PHO, MOR, SUX and P-aminophenyl-phosphoryl choline (PAPPC) were measured in sera from atopic individuals, defined by a positive Phadiatop test (>0.35 kU(A)/l), collected in nine countries representing high and low PHO-consuming nations.

RESULTS

There was a significant positive association between PHO consumption and prevalences of IgE-sensitization to PHO and MOR, but not to SUX and PAPPC, as calculated both by exposure group comparisons and linear regression analysis. The Netherlands and the USA, did not have PHO-containing drugs on the markets, although the former had a considerable PHO consumption. Both countries had high figures of IgE-sensitization.

CONCLUSION

This international prevalence study lends additional support to the PHO hypothesis and, consequently, that continued use of drugs containing this substance should be seriously questioned. The results also indicate that other, yet unknown, substances may lead to IgE-sensitization towards NMBAs.

Histamine is released in the wheal but not the flare following challenge of human skin in vivo: a microdialysis study

BACKGROUND

The mediator mechanisms of the cutaneous wheal and flare response, which underlies allergic skin and urticarial conditions, are controversial. The wheal results primarily from a direct effect of histamine on the local vascular bed but to what extent does histamine diffuse within the wheal? The flare is neurogenic, in origin, being disseminated within the dermis by axon reflexes, but do the neuropeptides released from the nerve endings cause the vasodilatation directly or do they induce the further release of histamine which then transduces the flare?

OBJECTIVE

We have addressed these questions by inserting 216 microns diameter microdialysis fibres into the dermis within the different areas of the wheal and flare to monitor changes in histamine levels provoked by intradermal injections of histamine, allergen, codeine and substance P. Twenty-one subjects participated in the investigations.

RESULTS

The histamine concentration in unprovoked skin was 10.5 +/- 0.6 nM. As the dialysis efficacy was approximately 50%, this equates to tissue concentrations of 20 nM. All provicants released large amounts of histamine at the injection site, maximum histamine levels being 337-1293 nM. Diffusion of histamine within the wheal was poor, levels at 2.3 mm and 3.7 mm from the site of injection being 4-22% and 0.2-3.7% respectively of those 1 mm from the injection site. No increased histamine levels were detected in the flare with any provicant. Atraumatic delivery to the skin of histamine in infusion concentrations of 30-10,000 nM caused concentration-related effects, at least 100 nM being necessary to induce a significant increase in skin blood flow, a threshold of 300-1000 being required to stimulate a visible flare and a measurable erythema, and 3000-10,000 nM being the minimum for induction of a wheal. Thus the skin blood vessels and nerves are responsive to histamine, but at relatively high concentrations.

CONCLUSIONS

These data support the theory that the flare reaction to focal histamine injection or release is a neurogenic reflex not involving histamine release at its effector end.

Pholcodine exposure raises serum IgE in patients with previous anaphylaxis to neuromuscular blocking agents

BACKGROUND

Neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) can cause anaphylaxis through immunoglobulin E (IgE) antibodies that bind quaternary ammonium ion epitopes. These epitopes are present in numerous common chemicals and drugs, exposure to which, theoretically, could be of importance in the development and maintenance of the IgE sensitization promoting allergic reactions. Pholcodine is one such drug, which in a recent pilot study was shown to induce a remarkable increase in serum IgE levels in two IgE-sensitized individuals. The present study explores the effect of pholcodine exposure on IgE in a population with previously diagnosed IgE-mediated anaphylaxis towards NMBAs.

METHODS

Seventeen patients were randomized to 1 week's exposure with cough syrup containing either pholcodine or guaifenesin. The primary variables serum IgE and IgE antibodies towards pholcodine, morphine and suxamethonium were measured before and 4 and 8 weeks after start of exposure.

RESULTS

Patients exposed to pholcodine had a sharp rise in levels of IgE antibodies towards pholcodine, morphine and suxamethonium, the median proportional increases 4 weeks after exposure reaching 39.0, 38.6 and 93.0 times that of the base levels respectively. Median proportional increase of IgE was 19.0. No changes were observed in the guaifenesin group.

CONCLUSION

Serum levels of IgE antibodies associated with allergy towards NMBAs increase significantly in sensitized patients after exposure to cough syrup containing pholcodine. Availability of pholcodine should be restricted by medical authorities because of the potential risk of future allergic reactions to muscle relaxants.

Anesthesia in the patient with multiple drug allergies: are all allergies the same?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

During the preoperative evaluation, patients frequently indicate 'multiple drug allergies', most of which have not been validated. Potential allergic cross-reactivity between drugs and foods is frequently considered as a risk factor for perioperative hypersensitivity. The aim of this review is to facilitate the recognition of risk factors for perioperative anaphylaxis and help the management of patients with 'multiple drug allergies' during the perioperative period.

RECENT FINDINGS

Neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) and antibiotics are the most common drugs triggering perioperative anaphylaxis. Quaternary ammonium ions have been suggested to be the allergenic determinant of NMBAs. Even though the 'pholcodine hypothesis' has been suggested to explain the occurrence of NMBA-induced allergy, this concept remains unclear. Although many practitioners believe that certain food allergies present an issue with the use of propofol, there is no role to contraindicate propofol in egg-allergic, soy-allergic or peanut-allergic patients. IgE-mediated hypersensitivity has been reported with seafood and iodinated drugs, IgE-mediated hypersensitivity has been reported with seafood and iodinated drugs, but there is no cross-reactivity between them. The allergenic determinants have been characterized for fish, shellfish and povidone iodine and remain unknown for contrast agents.

SUMMARY

There are many false assumptions regarding drug allergies. The main goal of this article is to review the potential cross-reactivity among specific families of drugs and foods in order to facilitate the anesthetic management of patients with 'multiple drug allergies'.

IgE-sensitization to the cough suppressant pholcodine and the effects of its withdrawal from the Norwegian market

BACKGROUND

IgE-mediated anaphylaxis to neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBA), frequent in Norway, was proposed to be caused by exposure to pholcodine (PHO) carrying the allergenic quarternary ammonium ion epitope. Consequently, the PHO-containing drug was withdrawn from the market in March 2007.

OBJECTIVE

Describe the effects of withdrawal of PHO on IgE, IgE-antibodies and reported frequencies of anaphylaxis to NMBAs.

METHODS

Three hundred sera from supposedly allergic patients sampled yearly through 2006 to 2010 were analysed for IgE antibodies to PHO, suxamethonium (SUX) and morphine (MOR). Furthermore, IgE and preliminary reports from the Norwegian Network for Anaphylaxis under Anaesthesia (NARA) were monitored.

RESULTS

PHO exposure was associated with IgE sensitization to PHO, MOR and SUX. However, after withdrawal, within 1 year, antibody prevalences to PHO and SUX fell significantly from 11.0% to 5.0% and from 3.7% to 0.7%, respectively. At 3 years, SUX had fallen to 0.3%, PHO to 2.7% and MOR to 1.3%. By 2 years, the prevalence of elevated IgE was significantly reduced. After 3 years, the incidence of reported suspected anaesthetic anaphylaxis fell significantly, both the total number, the reactions related to NMBAs and those with IgE antibodies to SUX.

CONCLUSIONS

Withdrawing of PHO lowered significantly within 1-2 years levels of IgE and IgE antibodies to PHO, MOR and SUX, and, within 3 years, the frequency of NMBA suspected anaphylaxis. The results strengthen the PHO hypothesis considerably and equally the need to question the existence of cough depressants containing PHO.

Codeine kinetics as determined by radioimmunoassay

Radioimmunoassay (RIA) was used to determine several pharmacokinetic parameters of codeine in man, including the relative bioavailability after oral and intramuscular administration. The study followed a crossover design in 6 healthy, young (18 to 21 yr), male volunteers. Three subjects received 65 mg codeine phosphate orally in an analgesic mixture which also contained aspirin, phenacetin, and caffeine. At the same time a similar group received an equivalent dose of codeine phosphate in a single intramuscular injection. Two weeks later the study was repeated so that each group received the alternate treatment. Plasma samples were collected at various times after drug administration, and codeine concentrations were determined by a specific RIA procedure. The procedure can detect less than 50 pg of codeine. Following intramuscular administration, peak plasma concentrations (194 to 340 ng/ml) were observed between 0.25 to 1 hr; after oral dosing, peak codeine plasma concentrations (102 to 140 ng/ml) appeared within 0.75 to 1 hr. The mean plasma t1/2 and volume of distribution of codeine following intramuscular injection were 3.32 hr and 5.1 L/kg, respectively. Oral, relative to intramuscular, bioavailability of codeine, based on areas under the codeine plasma curves, was 42% to 71% (mean, 53%).

Standardization of the prick test. A comparative study of three methods

The different needles and methods used in the prick test give rise to disparate results. This has significance when carrying out multi-centre studies and when using the technique in the standardization of allergenic extracts. With test reliability as our objective, prick tests were carried out on 30 subjects: 10 patients sensitive to Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus received a glycerine extract of known allergenic potency, 10 healthy individuals 2.5% codeine phosphate in a glycerine solution, and another 10, histamine 1/1000. The total prick tests per individual was 27 with each of the needles employed (Allergy Pricker, the Morrow-Brown needle and Insulin needle in accordance with Pepy's procedure). The tests were carried out systematically by three different testers, and the total number of prick tests performed was 810. With the Allergy Pricker, no differences were observed among results obtained by the same tester, nor when the results of the three testers were compared. With the Morrow-Brown needle, the results varied in the same person and from one tester to another, and on many occasions the test was negative. With the Pepys method, no falsely negative results were obtained, but there was considerable variation in the size of the wheal. The variation coefficient is 41% with the Allergy Pricker, and 115% and 64% with the Morrow-Brown and Pepys method, respectively. In conclusion, the results obtained clearly indicate that the highest degree of reproducibility is obtained with the Allergy Pricker.

Skin reactivity to codeine and histamine during prolonged corticosteroid therapy

Corticosteroids, used in low to moderate doses for short time intervals, do not suppress immediate percutaneous skin test responses to allergens, compound 48/80, or histamine. During routine skin testing, in our clinic, intradermal injection of codeine (1 mg/ml) and histamine (0.02 mg/ml) are used as positive controls. We had noted that responses to codeine but not histamine are decreased in some patients with asthma who had been receiving prolonged corticosteroid therapy. Therefore, we retrospectively compared skin test responses to codeine and histamine between 25 adult subjects with asthma receiving steroids (group I) and 25 age-matched control subjects (group II). In group I, the mean wheal diameters, induced by codeine but not histamine, were significantly less than diameters in group II. This decreased skin test reactivity to codeine was not due to effects of theophylline also taken by group I subjects, since the skin test reactions of other subjects with asthma, treated with theophylline but not steroids (group III), were not significantly different from reactions in group II. We conclude that prolonged courses of corticosteroids do not appear to alter histamine-induced vascular reactivity in skin but may affect cutaneous mast cell responses by an undefined mechanism.

Laboratory analysis of remotely collected oral fluid specimens for opiates by immunoassay

The performance characteristics of a method for detecting opiates (morphine, codeine, heroin, and 6-acetylmorphine [6-AM]) in oral fluid specimens were examined and compared with methods for urine specimens. The oral fluid was easily obtained using a simple device that collects between 1 and 1.5 mL of fluid for laboratory analysis. Simultaneously collected specimens from 60 known opiate abusers from a drug-treatment center were first tested using an immunoassay cutoff of 10 ng/mL in oral fluids and 2,000 ng/mL in urine. Using a second aliquot, opiate confirmation in urine was performed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and in oral fluids by GC-MS-MS. The combined immunoassay and GC-MS-MS procedures were completed with less than 250 pL of oral fluid. Opiates identified in oral fluid specimens from heroin users included morphine, codeine, heroin, and 6-AM. The immunoassay was tested for precision, stability, and the effects of potential cross-reactants. The results yielded 93.6% agreement between oral fluid and urine, suggesting that oral fluid may be a reliable matrix for opiate detection.

Cellular inflammatory responses during immediate, developing, and established late-phase allergic cutaneous reactions: effects of cetirizine

BACKGROUND

In some previous studies, the antihistamine cetirizine has inhibited both developing (at 6 hours) and established (at 24 hours) gross late-phase skin reactions (LPR) to pollen antigens, possibly relevant to clinical drug effects. However, the effects of cetirizine at the histologic level require further definition.

OBJECTIVE

To characterize cetirizine effects on gross and histologic inflammatory events from 20 minutes to 24 hours after intradermal antigen challenge in sensitive patients.

METHODS

Gross and histologic responses to intradermal pollen antigen, codeine, histamine, and buffer diluent were assessed during randomized 7-day treatments with cetirizine and placebo. Accumulated neutrophils, eosinophils, activated (EG2+) eosinophils, and T lymphocytes were quantitated. The degrees of extracellular deposition of lactoferrin from neutrophils and eosinophilic cationic protein (ECP) from eosinophils were also assessed.

RESULTS

During placebo treatment, wheal-and-flare responses were significantly greater to antigen at 20 minutes (p < 0.01) and induration at 6 hours (p < 0.01) at antigen challenge sites than at buffer diluent sites. During cetirizine treatment, these wheal-and-flare responses to antigen were inhibited significantly (p < 0.01) but gross LPRs were not affected. During placebo treatment, significantly more cells per high-power field were found in antigen sites than in buffer sites of neutrophils at 20 minutes (p < 0.01) and 24 hours; than in eosinophils at 20 minutes, 6 hours, and 24 hours (p < 0.01 for each); than in EG2+ cells at 20 minutes (p = 0.004), 6 hours (p = 0.001), and 24 hours (p = 0.02); and at T lymphocyte sites at 24 hours (p = 0.001). Extracellular deposition of lactoferrin and ECP was significantly greater at antigen sites than at buffer sites at 6 and 24 hours. Cetirizine treatment had no significant effect on these responses.

CONCLUSION

Neutrophils, eosinophils, and T lymphocytes were persistently more common at antigen sites than at buffer sites through 24 hours. Many of these neutrophils and eosinophils were activated, releasing more lactoferrin and ECP into the extracellular dermis for at least 24 hours after antigen challenge. Cetirizine inhibited gross immediate responses to antigen, but not the gross LPR nor the cellular inflammatory responses seen in such LPR sites.

Characterization of morphine-specific monoclonal antibodies showing minimal cross-reactivity with codeine

Six murine monoclonal antibodies against morphine were produced using N-(4-aminobutyl)normorphine as a hapten. Most of the antibodies obtained distinguished the substituents at the 3 and 6 positions of morphine. This property of the antibodies led to a reduction in cross-reactivity with codeine, morphine-3-glucuronide (M-3-G) and morphine-6-glucuronide (M-6-G) to negligible levels. However, one of the antibodies distinguished the substituent only at the 3 position of morphine, which cross-reacted with M-6-G, naloxone and naltrexone. In the competitive inhibition enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, morphine was detected at concentrations as low as circa 100 pg/ml.

Radioimmunoassay for the simultaneous determination of morphine and codeine

Antiserum against morphine was produced in rabbits immunized with morphine hapten conjugated to bovine serum albumin. The carrier protein was conjugated to the nitrogen atom of the opiate alkaloid in order to make the phenolic hydroxy group on C3 and the alcoholic group on C6 as determinant groups. The antibody does not recognize codeine or the major metabolite of morphine, 3-O-monoglucuronide. This antibody was used in conjunction with an antibody prepared against 3-O-carboxymethylmorphine to develop a radioimmunoassay which can measure codeine in the presence of morphine. The assay was used to follow both the plasma and brain levels of codeine and its biotransformation to morphine. Codeine when administered at a dose of 5 mg/kg i.v. showed a biphasic plasma decay curve the first phase of which had a +1/2 of 26 min. Peak concentrations of morphine were detected in the plasma following that dose of codeine at 0.5 h. 30 min after the injection of 20 mg/kg i.p. codeine, the brain levels of morphine were only 2% that of codeine. Thereafter, the brain levels of morphine slowly declined.

Ultra rush bee venom immunotherapy does not reduce cutaneous weal responses to bee venom and codeine phosphate

BACKGROUND

The rapid administration of bee venom in cumulative doses exceeding the quantity contained in one bee sting is well tolerated by most of the patients during 3.5 h of ultra-rush bee venom immunotherapy (VIT). The mechanism of this tolerance is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to verify the hypothesis that either slow mediator depletion of mast cells or blockade of their surface receptor mechanisms by increasing doses of allergen might be the major mechanisms of tolerance induced by ultra-rush VIT.

METHODS

Nine bee venom allergic patients with a history of severe systemic reactions after a bee sting, positive skin tests and bee venom specific serum IgE antibodies were treated as follows: on the first day a cumulative dose of 111 micrograms was administered over 3.5 h under intensive care conditions. Further injections were given on day 7, day 21 and thereafter at 4 week intervals. Intradermal tests with codeine phosphate (non-specific mast cell degranulation) and bee venom were performed before the initiation of VIT and 30 min after the last injection on the same day as well as before the subsequent bee venom injections.

RESULTS

No significant changes of skin reactivity to both codeine phosphate and bee venom were observed on day 1 (before initiation of VIT and after the last injection on the same day).

CONCLUSIONS

Ultra-rush VIT does not induce mediator depletion or surface receptor blockade in skin mast cells.

Clinical value of morphine, pholcodine and poppy seed IgE assays in drug-abusers and allergic people

BACKGROUND

The diagnosis of anaphylactic reactions due to opiates during anaesthesia can be difficult, since in most cases various drugs may have been administered. Detection of specific IgE to poppy seed might be a marker for sensitisation to opiates in allergic people and heroin-abusers. This study assessed the clinical value of morphine, pholcodine and poppy seed skin-prick and IgE determination in people suffering hypersensitivity reactions during anaesthesia or analgesia and drug-abusers with allergic symptoms.

METHODS

We selected heroin abusers and patients who suffered severe reactions during anaesthesia and analgesia from a database of 23,873 patients. The diagnostic yield (sensitivity, specificity and predictive value) of prick and IgE tests in determining opiate allergy was analysed.

RESULTS

Overall, 149 patients and 200 controls, mean age 32.9 ± 14.7 years, were included. All patients with positive prick to opiates showed positive prick and IgE to poppy seeds, but not to morphine or pholcodine IgE. Among drug-abusers, 13/42 patients (31%) presented opium hypersensitivity confirmed by challenge tests. Among non-drug abusers, sensitisation to opiates was higher in people allergic to tobacco (25%), P<.001. Prick tests and IgE against poppy seed had a good sensitivity (95.6% and 82.6%, respectively) and specificity (98.5% and 100%, respectively) in the diagnosis of opiate allergy.

CONCLUSIONS

Opiates may be significant allergens. Drug-abusers and people sensitised to tobacco are at risk. Both the prick and specific IgE tests efficiently detected sensitisation to opiates. The highest levels were related to more-severe clinical profiles.

Fibrin formation during ongoing cutaneous allergic reactions: comparison of responses to antigen and codeine

BACKGROUND

Fibrin formation, assessed by fibrinopeptide A levels, was evaluated over a 5-hour period at skin chamber sites challenged continuously with pollen antigen or codeine in 10 reactive individuals.

METHODS

The levels of fibrinopeptide A at antigen sites were compared with those at sites challenged with buffer diluent alone or with codeine for the first 3 hours, followed by antigen challenge during the subsequent 2 hours.

RESULTS

Findings showed: (1) fibrinopeptide A levels were higher at antigen challenge sites than at codeine challenge sites by the third hour, with these levels at both sites greater than those at buffer sites; (2) antigen challenge of the previous codeine sites during the third to fifth hours led to a further increase in fibrinopeptide A levels; (3) fibrinopeptide A levels correlated with chamber fluid immunoglobulin G levels but not with chamber fluid histamine levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Because antigen and codeine both activate mast cells prominently, these findings suggest that other factors play a role in the persistent fibrin formation at allergic skin reaction sites. Because antigen activates both basophils and mast cells and codeine only activates mast cells, we conclude that both basophils and mast cells contribute to the persistent fibrin formation at sites of allergic reactions.

Skin Reactivity to Histamine and Codeine in Unselected 9-Year-Old Children from Italy, Poland and Libya

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have shown that histamine skin reactivity (the dimensions of a skin wheal elicited by a prick with histamine 10 mg/ml) in unselected school children has increased in Italy during the past two decades and is higher in Italy than in Poland. Hence this variable can probably be influenced by a changing or different lifestyle. The aim of this study was to compare skin reactivity to histamine and codeine (a marker of histamine releasability from mast cells) in schoolchildren from countries with different lifestyles.

METHODS

Six previously unstudied unselected populations of 9-year-old schoolchildren (two each from Poland, Italy, and Libya; n = 863 subjects; 49.0% males) were pricked with two concentrations of histamine (10 and 1 mg/ml) and codeine (90 and 9 mg/ml).

RESULTS

The higher concentrations of both pharmacologic agents tested yielded significantly different wheal areas in the three countries: Poland < Italy < Libya (histamine, 11.8, 16.1 and 20.7 mm2; codeine, 9.2, 13.2 and 16.2 mm2; p < 0.001 for all comparisons). The lower concentrations elicited almost matching results. Histamine wheal areas correlated closely with areas elicited by codeine in the same individual: angular coefficients of the histamine to codeine regression lines were 0.535, Italy; 0.551, Libya; 0.612, Poland; and 0.581 for the whole population. More histamine was needed to produce a wheal in Poland than in Libya: a 20-mm2 wheal required an injected histamine concentration of about 8.8 mg/ml in Libya, 29.5 mg/ml in Italy and 102.1 mg/ml in Poland.

CONCLUSION

More studies are necessary to explain the observed international differences in skin histamine reactivity and their effect on the prevalence of positive allergen skin tests.