Volume replacement strategies do not impair the binding of dabigatran to idarucizumab: Porcine model of hemodilution

Background

Idarucizumab is a humanized Fab fragment that specifically reverses dabigatran anticoagulation. In trauma, volume expanders are used for resuscitation to compensate for blood loss and hemorrhagic shock, but it is unknown whether volume expanders influence the binding of dabigatran to its antidote. Using a porcine dilutional coagulopathy model, this study investigated whether volume replacement strategies affect binding of dabigatran to idarucizumab.

Methods

Twenty-five male pigs were treated orally with dabigatran etexilate (30 mg/kg bid) for 3 days. The following day, animals were anesthetized, infused with dabigatran (total dose 0.645 mg/kg) to achieve supratherapeutic concentrations, and randomized 1:1:1:1:1 (n = 5 per group) to control (no hemodilution) or hemodilution where ~50% of blood volume was substituted with Ringer’s solution, 6% hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4, 6% hydroxyethyl starch 200/0.5 or 4% gelatin. Idarucizumab was then administered intravenously (30 mg/kg) and serial blood samples were taken for up to 24 hours to measure diluted thrombin time (corresponding with dabigatran activity), total dabigatran (bound to antidote and free drug) and a panel of coagulation parameters.

Results

Mean plasma dabigatran levels were 617 ± 16 ng/mL after infusion and 600 ± 114 ng/mL after ~50% hemodilution with no significant differences between groups. Following treatment with idarucizumab, plasma concentrations of unbound dabigatran decreased markedly, with similar reductions in all groups. Dabigatran-induced prolongation of coagulation parameters was rapidly reversed in all groups.

Conclusion

This study indicates that several volume expanders used for resuscitation in trauma do not interfere with the binding of idarucizumab to dabigatran.

[Goal-directed administration of antidote for reversal of dabigatran anticoagulation]

Goal-directed administration of antidote for reversal of dabigatran anticoagulation Idarucizumab is a monoclonal antibody fragment that acts as an antidote to dabigatran. Idarucizumab is indicated in dabigatran-associated serious bleeds and to reverse dabigatran anticoagulation before acute surgical interventions or invasive medical procedures. The recommended dose of 5 g idarucizumab is sufficient to achieve a lasting restoration of coagulation in most patients. In a number of cases however, notably in deliberate overdoses and in accumulation of dabigatran in renal failure, repeated doses of idarucizumab may be necessary to avoid persisting or rebound anticoagulation. This article gives a brief explanation of the mechanisms responsible for this phenomenon and argues that it should be anticipated. Serial monitoring of APTT or dTT in patients treated with idarucizumab should enable the early detection of treatment failure or rebound anticoagulation and, if clinically indicated, prompt administration of additional doses of antidote.

Idarucizumab for Dabigatran Reversal - Full Cohort Analysis

BACKGROUND

Idarucizumab, a monoclonal antibody fragment, was developed to reverse the anticoagulant effect of dabigatran.

METHODS

We performed a multicenter, prospective, open-label study to determine whether 5 g of intravenous idarucizumab would be able to reverse the anticoagulant effect of dabigatran in patients who had uncontrolled bleeding (group A) or were about to undergo an urgent procedure (group B). The primary end point was the maximum percentage reversal of the anticoagulant effect of dabigatran within 4 hours after the administration of idarucizumab, on the basis of the diluted thrombin time or ecarin clotting time. Secondary end points included the restoration of hemostasis and safety measures.

RESULTS

A total of 503 patients were enrolled: 301 in group A, and 202 in group B. The median maximum percentage reversal of dabigatran was 100% (95% confidence interval, 100 to 100), on the basis of either the diluted thrombin time or the ecarin clotting time. In group A, 137 patients (45.5%) presented with gastrointestinal bleeding and 98 (32.6%) presented with intracranial hemorrhage; among the patients who could be assessed, the median time to the cessation of bleeding was 2.5 hours. In group B, the median time to the initiation of the intended procedure was 1.6 hours; periprocedural hemostasis was assessed as normal in 93.4% of the patients, mildly abnormal in 5.1%, and moderately abnormal in 1.5%. At 90 days, thrombotic events had occurred in 6.3% of the patients in group A and in 7.4% in group B, and the mortality rate was 18.8% and 18.9%, respectively. There were no serious adverse safety signals.

CONCLUSIONS

In emergency situations, idarucizumab rapidly, durably, and safely reversed the anticoagulant effect of dabigatran. (Funded by Boehringer Ingelheim; RE-VERSE AD ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02104947 .).

Intravenous Fibrinolysis in Ischemic Stroke of Large Vessel after Reversing Effect of Dabigatran with Idarucizumab

Currently the use of idarucizumab to reverse the effect of dabigatran emerges as a possibility of treatment for those patients who present with an ischemic stroke despite taking this anticoagulant. We present our experience regarding the use of intravenous tissue plasminogen activator in a patient with ischemic stroke due to complete occlusion of the left middle cerebral artery after blocking the effect of dabigatran with idarucizumab and whose result was an almost total improvement of the neurologic deficit. The use of this monoclonal antibody without a prothrombotic effect seems safe to be an intravenous fibrinolytic treatment option for patients taking dabigatran and having an ischemic stroke; however, more extensive studies are needed to determine its safety and efficacy.

Reversal of direct oral anticoagulants: a practical approach

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have at least noninferior efficacy compared with other oral anticoagulants and have ancillary benefits, including overall better safety profiles, lack of the need for routine monitoring, rapid onset of action, and ease of administration. Reversal of these agents may be indicated in certain situations such as severe bleeding and for perioperative management. DOAC-associated bleeding should be risk stratified: patients with moderate or severe bleeding should have the DOAC discontinued and reversal strategies should be considered. Laboratory testing has limited utility in the acute management of bleeding; thrombin time and activated partial thromboplastin time may be useful for excluding clinically relevant levels of dabigatran. Prothrombin time is potentially useful for rivaroxaban and edoxaban, but calibrated anti-Xa assays are optimal for determining clinically relevant levels of factor Xa inhibitors. Because specific reversal agents are not widely available, supportive care and interventions for local hemostasis remain the cornerstones of therapy in the patient with DOAC-associated bleeding. Nonspecific reversal agents should be considered only in the event of severe bleeding because their efficacy is unknown, and they are associated with risk of thrombosis. Recent results from phase 3/4 studies demonstrate efficacy for an antidote to dabigatran (idarucizumab, a monoclonal antibody fragment with specificity for dabigatran) and an antidote to factor Xa inhibitors (andexanet alfa, a recombinant and inactive form of factor Xa that binds inhibitors). A universal reversal agent (ciraparantag) for many anticoagulants, including the DOACs, shows promise in results from phase 1 and 2 studies.

Idarucizumab, a Humanized, Monoclonal Antibody Fragment for Immediate Reversal of Dabigatran

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the role of idarucizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody fragment, as a specific reversal agent for the anticoagulant activity of dabigatran and to review the pharmacology, pharmacokinetic properties, efficacy, and safety of this agent.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted consisting of a PubMed database using the MeSH term idarucizumab and the key word dabigatran antidote. Studies evaluating the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, safety, and efficacy of idarucizumab for the reversal of the anticoagulant activity of dabigatran were included.

RESULTS

Idarucizumab represents a novel treatment option as it is the only humanized, monoclonal antibody fragment that specifically binds to dabigatran. Studies evaluating reversal of dabigatran-induced anticoagulation have demonstrated immediate, complete, and sustained effects with idarucizumab. Idarucizumab did not overcorrect thrombin generation. Additionally, evaluations have shown that dabigatran can be safely reinitiated 24 hours after the administration of idarucizumab. The United States Food and Drug Administration granted priority review for the biologic license application and accelerated approval for idarucizumab.

CONCLUSION

Idarucizumab represents an encouraging development in the reversal of dabigatran. Its novel mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics, tolerability, and lack of thrombotic events contribute positively to its use in patients who experience bleeding or for those who require emergent surgery or procedures.

Optimizing the safety of treatment for venous thromboembolism in the era of direct oral anticoagulants

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are rapidly replacing vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE). The DOACs include dabigatran, which inhibits thrombin, and rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban, which inhibit factor Xa. When compared with conventional VTE treatment consisting of a parenteral anticoagulant followed by a VKA, the DOACs were equally effective for prevention of recurrence, but were associated with less bleeding. With similar efficacy, better safety, and the convenience of fixed dosing without the need for routine coagulation monitoring, guidelines now recommend DOACs over VKAs for VTE treatment in patients without active cancer. Nonetheless, measures are needed to optimize the safety of DOACs. Focusing on these measures, this paper summarizes the results of phase III trials evaluating DOACs for VTE treatment; identifies which VTE patients are or are not candidates for DOACs; provides guidance on how to choose among DOACs; lists the licensed dosing information for DOACs; discusses the optimal treatment duration for VTE; describes periprocedural management of DOACs in patients requiring surgery or intervention; and finally, reviews the management of bleeding, including the role for specific reversal agents.

Emergent Bleeding in Patients Receiving Direct Oral Anticoagulants

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) offer clinical advantages over warfarin, such as minimal medication and food interactions and fixed dosing without the need for routine monitoring of coagulation status. As with all anticoagulants, bleeding, either spontaneous or provoked, is the most common complication. The long-term use of these drugs is increasing, and there is a crucial need for emergency medicine service professionals to understand the optimal management of associated bleeding. This review aims to describe the indications and pharmacokinetics of available DOACs; to discuss the risk of bleeding; to provide a treatment algorithm to manage DOAC-associated emergency bleeding; and to discuss future directions in bleeding management, including the role of specific reversal agents, such as the recently approved idarucizumab for reversal of the direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran. Because air medical personnel are increasingly likely to encounter patients receiving DOACs, it is important that they have an understanding of how to manage patients with emergent bleeding.

Novel oral anticoagulants in plastic surgery

Novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have emerged as a good alternative to warfarin in the prevention of stroke for patients with atrial fibrillation. NOAC use is increasing rapidly; therefore, greater understanding of their use in the perioperative period is important for optimal care. Studies and reviews that reported on the use of NOACs were identified, with particular focus on the perioperative period. PubMed was searched for relevant articles published between January 2000 and August 2015. The inevitable rise in the use of NOACs such as rivaroxaban (Xarelto™), apixaban (Eliquis™), edoxaban (Lixiana™) and dabigatran (Pradaxa™) may present a simplified approach to perioperative anticoagulant management due to fewer drug interactions, rapidity of onset of action and relatively short half-lives. Coagulation status, however, cannot reliably be monitored and no antidotes are currently available. When planning for discontinuation of NOACs, special consideration of renal function is required. Advice regarding the management of bleeding complications is provided for consideration in emergency surgery. In extreme circumstances, haemodialysis may be considered for bleeding with the use of dabigatran. NOACs will increasingly affect operative planning in plastic surgery. In order to reduce the incidence of complications associated with anticoagulation, the management of NOACs in the perioperative period requires knowledge of the time of last dose, renal function and the bleeding risk of the planned procedure. Consideration of these factors will allow appropriate interpretation of the current guidelines.

The addition of idarucizumab to plasma samples containing dabigatran allows the use of routine coagulation assays for the diagnosis of hemostasis disorders

BACKGROUND

The anticoagulant effect of dabigatran can be approximated by its prolongation of routine coagulation assays. Consequently, dabigatran also interferes with thrombophilia screening or with diagnosing hemostasis disorders that have developed after the initiation of anticoagulant treatment, such as vitamin K deficiency or acquired hemophilia A.

OBJECTIVES

This study was carried out to determine whether idarucizumab, a humanized antibody fragment that binds dabigatran, could fully neutralize dabigatran in routine diagnostic coagulation assays conducted in vitro, thereby preventing false-positive or false-negative diagnostic readouts.

METHODS

Preliminary experiments identified coagulation assays that were sensitive to dabigatran, and identified a concentration of idarucizumab that neutralized the effects of dabigatran. These assays were then carried out with patient and control plasma samples spiked with dabigatran, with or without a molar excess of idarucizumab.

RESULTS

Dabigatran altered the prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time and thrombin time, and the measurement of intrinsic and extrinsic factor levels. Screening and confirmation tests used for lupus anticoagulant detection were prolonged by dabigatran, falsely suggesting the presence of lupus anticoagulant. Conversely, the addition of dabigatran falsely corrected an abnormal activated protein C resistance ratio. Addition of idarucizumab completely normalized these measurements, and allowed the correct identification of normal and abnormal samples with these assays.

CONCLUSIONS

In vitro addition of idarucizumab to plasma samples containing dabigatran fully neutralizes the drug, and facilitates the use of routine coagulation assays to allow the diagnosis of hemostasis disorders that may be concurrently present in patients taking dabigatran.

[Monitoring options and reversal agents for oral anticoagulants]

The approval of the oral direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatranetexilat and the oral factor Xa inhibitors rivaroxaban and apixaban as thromboprophylaxis challenges the position of the vitamin K antagonists (VKA). Predictable pharmacodynamics gives the new oral anticoagulants an advantageous profile. Unlike VKAs there is no specific reversal agent available for the new oral anticoagulants. Experience with haemostatic products for the emergency management of critical bleeding caused by these agents is limited.