Rectal perforation during defecography: extraluminal barium impaction removed by TEM (Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery)

AIM

Defecography is the standard diagnostic technique for the diagnosis of functional disorders of the posterior pelvic compartment. However it has some limits as radiation exposure, low-contrast resolution, some degrees of embarrassment and discomfort for the patients. Furthermore it often fails to directly visualize the changes that affect the pararectal space. Here we present a never described case of rectal perforation after defecography with barium impaction removed by TEM (Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery).

CASE REPORT

We present a case of a 50 years old woman with extraluminal barium impaction due to perforation occurred during defecography. Both pelvic MR and endoanal ultrasound confirmed the presence of the extramural rectal mass below rectal mucosa. It was completely and safely removed using transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM).

RESULTS

The barium impaction has been radically removed using transanal endoscopic microsurgery. The post-operative period was uneventful and the patient was discharged 3 days after the operation. She is asymptomatic after 6 months from surgery.

CONCLUSION

Defecography is not completely safe and its use must be indicated only in selected cases. When a patient has complications during or after this investigation he must be referred to a specialistic centre where a tailored treatment can be performed. It is mandatory that the indication for defecography and other diagnostic functional investigations is given by a colorectal specialist KEY WORD: Barium Impaction, Defecography, Rectal Perforation, TEM (Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery).

Vaginal opacification during defecography: direction of vaginal migration aids in diagnosis of pelvic floor pathology

BACKGROUND

To determine whether direction of vaginal displacement during defecography aids in diagnosing pelvic floor pathology.

METHODS

Ninety patients underwent defecography over a 2-year period. Each study was retrospectively reviewed by three radiologists who recorded whether the vagina was displaced cephalad, caudad, or nondisplaced in relation to the urogenital hiatus. This information was then correlated with radiologic diagnosis rendered for the study.

RESULTS

Of the 26 patients with normal defecograms, 19 (73%; p < 0. 001) demonstrated no vaginal displacement during the procedure. Comparatively, 10 (83%; p < 0.001) of the 12 patients with cystoceles showed caudad vaginal displacement, and no patients with cystoceles showed cephalad displacement of the vagina. Of the 17 patients with rectoceles, 10 (58%) showed cephalad displacement, one (6%) showed caudad displacement, and six (35%) patients showed no vaginal displacement. Thirteen (46%) of 28 patients with enteroceles showed cephalad vaginal displacement, nine (32%) showed no vaginal displacement, and six (21%) demonstrated caudad displacement.

CONCLUSIONS

Caudad displacement of the opacified vagina suggests the presence of a cystocele. Cephalad vaginal displacement is suggestive of the presence of an enterocele or rectocele.