Inter‐ and intralaboratory variation of in vitro diffusion cell measurements: An international multicenter study using quasi‐standardized methods and materials

In vitro measurements of skin absorption are an increasingly important aspect of regulatory studies, product support claims, and formulation screening. However, such measurements are significantly affected by skin variability. The purpose of this study was to determine inter- and intralaboratory variation in diffusion cell measurements caused by factors other than skin. This was attained through the use of an artificial (silicone rubber) rate-limiting membrane and the provision of materials including a standard penetrant, methyl paraben (MP), and a minimally prescriptive protocol to each of the 18 participating laboratories. "Standardized" calculations of MP flux were determined from the data submitted by each laboratory by applying a predefined mathematical model. This was deemed necessary to eliminate any interlaboratory variation caused by different methods of flux calculations. Average fluxes of MP calculated and reported by each laboratory (60 +/- 27 microg cm(-2) h(-1), n = 25, range 27-101) were in agreement with the standardized calculations of MP flux (60 +/- 21 microg cm(-2) h(-1), range 19-120). The coefficient of variation between laboratories was approximately 35% and was manifest as a fourfold difference between the lowest and highest average flux values and a sixfold difference between the lowest and highest individual flux values. Intralaboratory variation was lower, averaging 10% for five individuals using the same equipment within a single laboratory. Further studies should be performed to clarify the exact components responsible for nonskin-related variability in diffusion cell measurements. It is clear that further developments of in vitro methodologies for measuring skin absorption are required.

A prospective randomized multicenter clinical evaluation of an anterior cervical fusion cage

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective, concurrently controlled, randomized, multicenter trial of an anterior Bagby and Kuslich cervical fusion cage (BAK/C; Sulzer Spine-Tech, Minneapolis, MN) for treatment of degenerative disc disease of the cervical spine.

OBJECTIVES

To report clinical results with maximum 24-month follow-up of fusions performed with the BAK/C fusion cage.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Threaded lumbar cages have been used during the past decade as a safe and effective surgical solution for chronic disabling low back pain. Threaded cages have now been developed for use in anterior cervical interbody fusions to obviate the need for allografts or autogenous bone grafting procedures while providing initial stability during the fusion process.

METHODS

Patients with symptomatic cervical discogenic radiculopathy were treated with either anterior cervical discectomy with uninstrumented bone-only fusion (ACDF) or BAK/C fusion cage(s). Independent radiographic assessment of fusion was made and patient-based outcome was assessed by visual analog pain scale and a Short Form (SF)-36 Health Status Questionnaire.

RESULTS

Data analysis included 344 patients at 1 year and 180 at 2 years. When the two cage groups (hydroxya, patite-coated or noncoated) were compared with the ACDF group, similar outcomes were noted for duration of surgery, hospital stay, improvements in neck pain and radicular pain in the affected limb, improvements in the SF-36 Physical Component subscale and Mental Component subscale, and the patients' perception of overall surgical outcome. Symptom improvements were maintained at 2 years. A greater percentage of patients with ACDF needed an iliac crest bone harvest than did BAK/C patients (67% vs.- 3%). Successful fusion for one-level procedures at 12 months was 97.9% for the BAK/C groups and 89.7% for the ACDF group (P < 0.05). The complication rate for the ACDF group was 20.4% compared with an overall complication rate of 11.8% with BAK/C. There was no difference in complications that necessitated a second operative procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

These results demonstrate that outcomes after a cervical fusion procedure with a threaded cage are the same as those of a conventional uninstrumented bone-only anterior discectomy and fusion with a low risk of complications and rare need for autogenous bone graft harvest.

Four-year follow-up results of lumbar spine arthrodesis using the Bagby and Kuslich lumbar fusion cage

STUDY DESIGN

This was a prospective multicenter clinical trial of a lumbar interbody fusion cage with a minimum of 4 years' follow-up.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether the early positive clinical results in fusions with lumbar cages, such as the Bagby and Kuslich (BAK) cage, are maintained beyond 2 years.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Threaded cages have been used increasingly for the treatment of symptomatic degenerative intervertebral disc disease. Concerns about the long-term clinical outcomes of this procedure have been posed, particularly regarding bony fusion viability, revision rates, potential adjacent level disease, and late complications.

METHODS

The study cohort was a 196-patient subset from a prospective investigational device exemption. In addition to early postoperative examinations, these patients were examined biannually with a minimum of 4 years' follow-up. Patient outcome was assessed by a 6-point scale that evaluated pain relief, and functional improvement was determined by changes in activities of daily living. Fusion rates and return to work were determined. Complications and secondary operations were reported and categorized as non-device related or device related.

RESULTS

The patient cohort with 4-year follow-up represented 25.6% of the original study population eligible at that time. Overall, the largest percentage of pain relief and functional improvements occurred by 3 months, and these improvements were maintained at each follow-up. Overall fusion rate was 91.7% and 95. 1% at 2 and 4 years, respectively. In this cohort, 39.5% of patients were working or were able to work within 3 months of surgery. After 4 years, 62.7% of patients were gainfully employed or able to work. The late-occurring complication rate in this cohort was 13.8% (27/196). Complications necessitating a second operation occurred in 8.7% (17/196), whereas reoperations that were deemed device related were performed in 3.1% (6/196).

CONCLUSIONS

This study indicates that the early positive benefits of interbody fusion cage procedures are maintained through 4 years with acceptably low morbidity.