Endoscopic botulinum toxin injection combined with balloon dilatation for treatment of cricopharyngeal achalasia in patient with brainstem stroke

OBJECTIVES

At present, there are many reports about the treatment of cricopharyngeal achalasia by injecting botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) into cricopharyngeal muscle guided by ultrasound, electromyography or CT in China, but there is no report about injecting BTX-A into cricopharyngeal muscle guided by endoscope. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of endoscopic BTX-A injection combined with balloon dilatation in the treatment of cricopharyngeal achalasia after brainstem stroke, and to provide a better method for the treatment of dysphagia after brainstem stroke.

METHODS

From June to December 2022, 30 patients with cricopharyngeal achalasia due to brainstem stroke were selected from the Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, the First Hospital of Changsha. They were randomly assigned into a control group and a combined group, 15 patients in each group. Patients in both groups were treated with routine rehabilitation therapy, while patients in the control group were treated with balloon dilatation, and patients in the combined group were treated with balloon dilatation and BTX-A injection. Before treatment and after 2 weeks of treatment, the patients were examined by video fluoroscopic swallowing study, Penetration-aspiration Scale (PAS), Dysphagia Outcome Severity Scale (DOSS), and Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS) were used to assess the swallowing function.

RESULTS

In the combined group, 1 patient withdrew from the treatment because of personal reasons. Two weeks after treatment, the scores of DOSS, PAS, and FOIS in both groups were better than those before treatment (all P<0.01), and the combined group was better than the control group (all P<0.001). The effective rate was 85.7% in the combined group and 66.7% in the control group, with no significant difference between the 2 groups (P>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

BTX-A injection combined with balloon dilatation is more effective than balloon dilatation alone in improving swallowing function and is worthy of clinical application.

Ultrasound, electromyography, and balloon guidance for injecting botulinum toxin for cricopharyngeal achalasia: A case report

INTRODUCTION

Botulinum toxin (BTX) injection is a widely used treatment option for dysphagia associated with cricopharyngeal (CP) muscle achalasia, but uniform standards and protocols for administration techniques and injection sites are still lacking. This case study suggests that a unique administration technique involving a combination of ultrasound, electromyography, and balloon guidance for injecting the CP muscle can reduce inadvertent migration of BTX to non-injected tissues and increase the effectiveness and safety of BTX treatment.

PATIENT CONCERNS

We describe the case of a 74-year-old man who could not swallow food or saliva for 8 months.

DIAGNOSIS

The patient showed signs of true bulbar paralysis, including dizziness, hoarseness, and dysphagia. The fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing showed massive mucilage secretion and residual materials in the postcricoid region and aspiration when swallowing 1 ml of yogurt. The video fluoroscopic swallowing study showed profoundly limited epiglottic folding and CP muscle non-relaxation, despite several unsuccessful swallow attempts.

INTERVENTIONS

To manage insufficient relaxation opening of the CP muscle, BTX injection was performed using ultrasound, electromyography, and balloon catheter guidance. The narrow CP muscle situated above the balloon was identified as the target of injection by ultrasound.

OUTCOMES

The patient was able to eat a soft diet. The follow-up fibrotic endoscopic swallowing study demonstrated a reduction in the amount of pharyngeal residue. The video fluoroscopic swallowing study showed that CP muscle relaxation was significantly enhanced and no penetration was shown.

CONCLUSION

The unique administration technique with triple guidance holds several advantages, suggesting that it may be a promising treatment for CP muscle achalasia.

Triple A (Allgrove) syndrome due to AAAS gene mutation with a rare association of amyotrophy

INTRODUCTION

Triple A (Allgrove) syndrome is a rare autosomal recessive disorder characterized by cardinal features of primary adrenal insufficiency (AI) due to adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) resistance, achalasia, and alacrima. It is frequently associated with neurological manifestations such as autonomic dysfunction, cognitive dysfunction, cranial nerve, or motor involvement. Amyotrophy/motor neuron disease is a rare association.

CASE PRESENTATION

We herein report a 19-year-old boy diagnosed with triple A syndrome (TAS), with the classic triad of ACTH-resistant adrenal insufficiency, achalasia, and alacrima. Additionally, he had distal spinal muscle amyotrophy. Alacrima was the earliest feature evident in early childhood, followed by achalasia at 12 years of age. He was diagnosed with AI at the age of 19 years, with involvement of the mineralocorticoid axis. Further evaluation showed a neurogenic pattern on electromyography, consistent with a diagnosis of motor neuron disease. A nerve conduction study revealed no significant neuropathy. Genetic analysis confirmed a pathogenic homozygous mutation in the AAAS gene c.43C>A, p.Gln15Lys. He improved with glucocorticoid and mineralocorticoid supplements for AI, and nifedipine for achalasia and artificial tears. He is planned for esophagomyotomy.

CONCLUSION

In any young patient with AI not due to congenital adrenal hyperplasia, Allgrove syndrome should be ruled out. Though mineralocorticoid sparing pattern is classical, it can rarely be involved, as seen in the index case. Various components of the syndrome, as well as amyotrophy and other neurologic features, may present in a metachronous fashion. Hence, a high index of clinical suspicion can aid in early diagnosis and management.

Isosorbide and nifedipine for Chagas' megaesophagus: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Chagas disease is a neglected tropical disease. About 6 to 8 million people are chronically infected and 10% to 15% develop irreversible gastrointestinal disorders, including megaesophagus. Treatment focuses on improving symptoms, and isosorbide and nifedipine may be used for this purpose.

METHODOLOGY

We conducted a systematic review to evaluate the effectiveness of pharmacological treatment for Chagas' megaesophagus. We searched MEDLINE, Embase and LILACS databases up to January 2018. We included both observational studies and RCTs evaluating the effects of isosorbide or nifedipine in adult patients with Chagas' megaesophagus. Two reviewers screened titles and abstracts, selected eligible studies and extracted data. We assessed the risk of bias using NIH 'Quality Assessment Tool for Before-After (Pre-Post) Studies with No Control Group' and RoB 2.0 tool. Overall quality of evidence was assessed using GRADE.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

We included eight studies (four crossover RCTs, four before-after studies). Three studies evaluated the effect of isosorbide on lower esophageal sphincter pressure (LESP), showing a significant reduction (mean difference -10.52mmHg, 95%CI -13.57 to-7.47, very low quality of evidence). Three studies reported the effect of isosorbide on esophageal emptying, showing a decrease in esophageal retention rates (mean difference -22.16%, 95%CI -29.94 to -14.38, low quality of evidence). In one study, patients on isosorbide reported improvement in the frequency and severity of dysphagia (moderate quality of evidence). Studies evaluating nifedipine observed a decrease in LESP but no effect on esophageal emptying (very low and low quality of evidence, respectively). Isosorbide had a higher incidence of headache as a side effect than nifedipine.

CONCLUSIONS

Although limited, available evidence shows that both isosorbide and nifedipine are effective in reducing esophageal symptoms. Isosorbide appears to be more effective, and its use is supported by a larger number of studies; nifedipine, however, appears to have a better tolerability profile.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42017055143. ClinicalTrials.gov CRD42017055143.

Intrasphincteric Botulinum Toxin Injections to Treat Achalasia Diagnosed in 615 Pregnancy: A Case Report

BACKGROUND

Achalasia is an esophageal smooth muscle disorder characterized by failure of the lower esophageal sphincter to relax with swallowing.

CASE

A 17-year-old primigravid woman with an intrauterine pregnancy at 31+3 weeks reported an unintentional 22.5 kg weight loss in 2 years. Her body mass index was 15.9. Her symptoms included nausea, regurgitation, and worsening dysphagia. MRI suggested achalasia. She was started on total parenteral nutrition until she developed bacteremia. An esophagogastroduodenoscopy with Duotube placement and botulinum toxin A injections were performed. Tube feeds were initiated and continued until the Duotube became obstructed. The patient delivered at 37+4 weeks with mild preeclampsia. A postpartum barium swallow test indicated achalasia.

CONCLUSION

A history of dysphagia to solids and/or liquids with weight loss should raise clinical suspicions for achalasia.

Self-medication of achalasia with cannabis, complicated by a cannabis use disorder

Achalasia is a rare esophagus motility disorder. Medical, endoscopic and surgical treatments are available, but all endorse high relapse rates. No data has been published to date reporting a therapeutic effect of cannabis use neither in achalasia nor on its influence on manometric measurements. We report the case of a patient diagnosed with achalasia. He could benefit from a large panel of therapeutic interventions, but none of them was effective over the time. He first used cannabis at age 20 and identified benefits regarding achalasia symptoms. He maintained regular moderate cannabis use for 9 years, with minimal digestive inconvenience. A manometry performed without cannabis premedication was realized at age 26 and still found a cardiospasm. Cannabis use could explain the gap between functional symptoms assessment and manometry measurement. Further investigations are warranted to explore a therapeutic effect of cannabis in achalasia and possible influence on outcome measurements.

Achalasia: a systematic review

IMPORTANCE

Achalasia significantly affects patients' quality of life and can be difficult to diagnose and treat.

OBJECTIVE

To review the diagnosis and management of achalasia, with a focus on phenotypic classification pertinent to therapeutic outcomes.

EVIDENCE REVIEW

Literature review and MEDLINE search of articles from January 2004 to February 2015. A total of 93 articles were included in the final literature review addressing facets of achalasia epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes. Nine randomized controlled trials focusing on endoscopic or surgical therapy for achalasia were included (734 total patients).

FINDINGS

A diagnosis of achalasia should be considered when patients present with dysphagia, chest pain, and refractory reflux symptoms after an endoscopy does not reveal a mechanical obstruction or an inflammatory cause of esophageal symptoms. Manometry should be performed if achalasia is suspected. Randomized controlled trials support treatments focused on disrupting the lower esophageal sphincter with pneumatic dilation (70%-90% effective) or laparoscopic myotomy (88%-95% effective). Patients with achalasia have a variable prognosis after endoscopic or surgical myotomy based on subtypes, with type II (absent peristalsis with abnormal pan-esophageal high-pressure patterns) having a very favorable outcome (96%) and type I (absent peristalsis without abnormal pressure) having an intermediate prognosis (81%) that is inversely associated with the degree of esophageal dilatation. In contrast, type III (absent peristalsis with distal esophageal spastic contractions) is a spastic variant with less favorable outcomes (66%) after treatment of the lower esophageal sphincter.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Achalasia should be considered when dysphagia is present and not explained by an obstruction or inflammatory process. Responses to treatment vary based on which achalasia subtype is present.

Deficiency of ALADIN impairs redox homeostasis in human adrenal cells and inhibits steroidogenesis

Triple A syndrome is a rare, autosomal recessive cause of adrenal failure. Additional features include alacrima, achalasia of the esophageal cardia, and progressive neurodegenerative disease. The AAAS gene product is the nuclear pore complex protein alacrima-achalasia-adrenal insufficiency neurological disorder (ALADIN), of unknown function. Triple A syndrome patient dermal fibroblasts appear to be more sensitive to oxidative stress than wild-type fibroblasts. To provide an adrenal and neuronal-specific disease model, we established AAAS-gene knockdown in H295R human adrenocortical tumor cells and SH-SY5Y human neuroblastoma cells by lentiviral short hairpin RNA transduction. AAAS-knockdown significantly reduced cell viability in H295R cells. This effect was exacerbated by hydrogen peroxide treatment and improved by application of the antioxidant N-acetylcysteine. An imbalance in redox homeostasis after AAAS knockdown was further suggested in the H295R cells by a decrease in the ratio of reduced to oxidized glutathione. AAAS-knockdown SH-SY5Y cells were also hypersensitive to oxidative stress and responded to antioxidant treatment. A further impact on function was observed in the AAAS-knockdown H295R cells with reduced expression of key components of the steroidogenic pathway, including steroidogenic acute regulatory and P450c11β protein expression. Importantly a significant reduction in cortisol production was demonstrated with AAAS knockdown, which was partially reversed with N-acetylcysteine treatment.

CONCLUSION

Our in vitro data in AAAS-knockdown adrenal and neuronal cells not only corroborates previous studies implicating oxidative stress in this disorder but also provides further insights into the pathogenic mechanisms in triple A syndrome.

Echo-guided injection of botulinum toxin versus blind endoscopic injection in patients with achalasia: final report

AIM

Achalasia, also known as Esophageal achalasia, is an esophageal motility disorder involving the smooth muscle layer of the esophagus and the lower esophageal sphincter (LES). It is characterized by incomplete LES relaxation, increased LES tone, and lack of peristalsis of the esophagus (inability of smooth muscle to move food down the esophagus) in the absence of other explanations like cancer or fibrosis. In our experience, the echo-guided injection technique is the first procedure to implement to cure patients. After endoscopic-echo-guided injection technique, in patients presenting with refractory symptoms, the authors believe in surgical technique (extramucosal myotomy) as a good alternative technique to be implemented.

METHODS

From 1999 to 2010, the authors have treated 36 patients (Group A), 24 male and 12 female (age 26-78) with diagnosis of esophageal achalasia. Patients underwent botulinum toxin injection during echo-guided identification of the lower esophageal sphincter. Results were compared with 32 patients (Group B) (age 36-78) who underwent blind treatment.

RESULTS

Patients of Group A presented complete relief of obstruction, patients of Group B had an obstruction remission in the 86% of the cases. Results were confirmed by manometric assessments in the early months after endoscopic treatment.

CONCLUSION

The authors emphasize the importance of the injection of botulinum toxin into the thicker area of the muscle layer of the lower esophageal sphincter. Patients undergoing echo-guided injection technique presented complete relief of obstruction, confirmed by manometric assessments in the early months after treatment.

A case of vomiting in an anorexic achalasic patient

Wernicke's encephalopathy is a neurological disorder caused by thiamine (vitamin B1) deficiency characterized by vertigo, ataxia, and mental confusion. Wernicke's encephalopathy has a causative association with alcoholism but recently there has been an increased prevalence also in other clinical conditions. In literature potentially fatal Wernicke's encephalopathy onset in an advanced achalasia has been previously reported only once. We describe for the first time an improvement of achalasic symptoms in a young patient affected by end-stage achalasia and anorexia nervosa (coming from ineffective Heller-Dor myotomy) after vitamin B1 supplementation. This case report suggest a potential positive impact of B1 supplementation on end-stage achalasic patients and requires systematic studies to confirm this observation.

[Two cases of esophageal achalasia, in which localized botulinum toxin injections were effective to improve symptoms]

The cases were a 64-year-old man and a 57-year-old woman both with discomfort and dysphasia. They were given a diagnosis of esophageal achalasia after gastrointestinal endoscopy, barium esophagography and esophageal internal pressure tests. Their symptoms were dramatically improved by localized botulinum toxin injections, which were commonly available in the US. The localized botulinum toxin injection treatment is safe and minimally invasive with few complications. It is effective to reduce symptoms in esophageal achalasia.

Comparison of pneumatic dilation with pneumatic dilation plus botulinum toxin for treatment of achalasia

Among the therapeutic options for achalasia are pneumatic dilatation (PD), an appropriate long-term therapy, and botulinum toxin injection (BT) that is a relatively short-term therapy. This study aimed to compare therapeutic effect of repetitive pneumatic dilation with a combined method (botulinum toxin injection and pneumatic dilation) in a group of achalasia patients who are low responder to two initial pneumatic dilations. Thirty-four patients with documented primary achalasia that had low response to two times PD (<50% decrease in symptom score and barium height at 5 minute in timed esophagogram after 3 month of late PD) were randomized to receive pneumatic dilation (n=18) or botulinum toxin injection and pneumatic dilation by four weeks interval (n=16), PD and BT+PD groups respectively. Symptom scores were evaluated before and at 1, 6 and 12 months after treatment. Clinical remission was defined as a decrease in symptom score > or = 50% of baseline. There were no significant differences between the two groups in gender, age and achalasia type. Remission rate of patients in BT-PD group in comparison with PD group were 87.5% vs. 67.1% (P = 0.7), 87.5% vs. 61.1% (P = 0.59) and 87.5% vs. 55.5% (P = 0.53) at 1, 6 and 12 months respectively .There were no major complications in either group. The mean symptom score decreased by 62.71% in the BT-PD group (P < 0.002) and 50.77% in the PD group (P < 0.01) at the end of the first year. Despite a better response rate in BT+PD group, a difference was not statistically significant. A difference may be meaningful if a large numbers of patients are included in the study.

[Laparoscopic Heller myotomy for esophageal achalasia. Is a fundoplication necessary?]

The last decade has witnessed radical changes in the treatment of esophageal achalasia due to the development of minimally invasive techniques. Because of the high success rate of the laparoscopic Heller myotomy, a radical shift in the treatment algorithm of these patients has occurred, and today this is the preferred treatment modality for achalasia. This remarkable change is due to the recognition by gastroenterologists and patients that a laparoscopic Heller myotomy outperforms pneumatic dilatation and intra-sphincteric injection of botulinum toxin injection. While there is agreement about the technique of the myotomy per se, some questions still linger about the need for a fundoplication after the myotomy. The following review describes the data present in the literature in order to identify the best procedure that can achieve relief of dysphagia while avoiding development of gastroesophageal reflux.

Calcium channel blockers and motility disorders of the esophagus

In animal experiments, esophageal smooth muscle, including the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) has been shown to be dependent on extracellular calcium both for tone and agonist induced contractions. Calcium channel blockers (CCB) suppress contractile activity, and block both resting and stimulated calcium influx. In normal man as well as in patients with hypercontractility disorders of the esophagus, such as achalasia and diffuse esophageal spasm, CCBs have been shown to reduce LES pressure and esophageal contractions, and also to cause symptomatic improvement. Controlled clinical trials on their effectiveness are lacking, but the therapeutic principle seems promising.

Achalasia

Achalasia is a rare motor disorder of the esophagus, characterized by the absence of peristalsis and impaired swallow-induced relaxation. These motor abnormalities result in stasis of ingested food in the esophagus, leading to clinical symptoms, such as dysphagia, regurgitation of food, retrosternal pain and weight loss. Etiology is unknown. Some familial cases have been reported, but the rarity of familial occurrence does not support the hypothesis that genetic inheritance is a significant etiologic factor. Association of achalasia with viral infections and auto-antibodies against myenteric plexus has been reported, but the causal relationship remains unclear. In terms of diagnosis, esophageal manometry is the gold standard to diagnose achalasia. Still, its role in post-treatment surveillance remains controversial. Radiological studies support the initial diagnosis of achalasia and have been proposed for detecting preclinical symptomatic recurrence. Although endoscopy is considered to have a poor sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of achalasia, it has an important role in ruling out secondary causes of achalasia. Treatment is strictly palliative. Current medical and surgical therapeutic options (pneumatic dilation, surgical myotomy, and pharmacologic agents) aimed at reducing the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure and facilitating esophageal emptying by gravity and hydrostatic pressure of retained food and liquids.

A case of mediastinitis following botulinum toxin type A treatment for achalasia

BACKGROUND

A 62-year-old obese, diabetic female underwent endoscopic esophageal injection of botulinum toxin type A (Botox; Allergan, Irvine, CA) for achalasia. The patient presented to her gastroenterologist with chest pain 4 days after the procedure, but no thoracic or gastrointestinal pathologies were identified and the patient was sent home. She presented again the next day with continuing chest pain and newly developed fever. Esophagoduodenoscopy revealed no esophageal leak and a CT scan revealed only mild paraesophageal inflammation. The patient was sent home the same day with antibiotics after a urinalysis suggested presence of a urinary tract infection. The patient presented again 9 days after the procedure with continuing chest pain and fever.

INVESTIGATIONS

Chest radiography, electrocardiography, complete blood count, cardiac enzyme levels, basic metabolic panel, urinalysis, Gastrografin (Bracco Diagnostics Inc, Princeton, New Jersey) and barium swallow study, endoscopy, abdominal and chest CT scans, blood culture and wound culture.

DIAGNOSIS

Ulceration without perforation of the esophageal mucosa in the area of Botox injections. Unilateral pleural effusion and mediastinitis without abscess formation.

MANAGEMENT

Pantoprazole and clonazepam for suspected gastroesophageal reflux and esophageal spasm. Levofloxacin for urinary tract infection. Intravenous antibiotic therapy and acute surgical exploration for possible esophageal rupture. Paraesophageal drain placement, nasogastric tube placement, and parenteral and enteral feeding.

Achalasia: an overview of diagnosis and treatment

Achalasia is a primary esophageal disorder involving the body of the esophagus and lower esophageal sphincter affecting equally both genders and all ages. While its etiology remains unclear, the pathophysiologic mechanism involves the destruction of the myenteric plexi responsible for esophageal peristalsis. Given the slow, initially oligosymptomatic progression and relative low prevalence of disease, achalasia can remain undiagnosed for years. In terms of diagnosis, esophageal manometry is the gold standard to diagnose achalasia. Still, its role in post-treatment surveillance remains controversial. Radiological studies support the initial diagnosis of achalasia and have been proposed for detecting pre-clinical symptomatic recurrence. Although endoscopy is considered to have a poor sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of achalasia, it has an important role in ruling out secondary causes of achalasia (i.e. pseudoachalasia). With respect to treatment, laparoscopic myotomy and pneumatic balloon dilatations of the lower esophageal sphincter are considered definitive treatments for achalasia. Both treatment options offer sustained clinical responses, with head-to-head trials being currently underway. Botulinum toxin injection in the lower esophageal sphincter is considered an acceptable alternative in patients who are not candidates for surgery or balloon dilatation or as proof of concept in difficult to diagnose patients. Pharmacologic therapies for achalasia offer mild, transient improvement at best. In summary, diagnosis achalasia requires shrewd history taking and dedicated esophageal testing. In experienced hands, treatment of achalasia can provide long-term sustained clinical improvement.

Pseudoachalasia of the cardia secondary to nongastrointestinal neoplasia

A minor proportion of patients with achalasia eventually have a neoplasm and, as a consequence, pseudoachalasia is diagnosed. A neoplasm may either involve gastrointestinal junction or present a paraneoplastic effect. Over the global diagnoses of achalasia issued in 5 years of experience in our motility unit, we have found 13% (3/23 cases) of pseudoachalasia (2-4% in previous series, probably due to the fact that the population assisted was mainly composed of elderly patients). The origin of the neoplasm was bladder, prostate and metastases from epidermoid carcinoma of vocal chord. Treatment of primary neoplasm, besides classical approach (with dilatation of botulinum injection) may help in the resolution of this clinical disorder.

[Pseudoachalasia due to amyloidosis treated by botulinum toxin]

INTRODUCTION

Pseudoachalasia mimics primary achalasia and can provoke serious complications in the elderly.

CASE RECORD

A 84 years-old woman had dysphagia with recurrent pneumonia. Pseudoachalasia related to a multifocal primitive amyloidosis was diagnosed. Treatment with botulinum toxin injection during a gastric fibroscopy resulted in clinical improvement, still notable 15 months later.

DISCUSSION

Botulinum toxin injection may be a useful tool in treatment of pseudoachalasia due to amyloidosis.

Effect of botulinum toxin injection for achalasia in Thai patients

BACKGROUND

Achalasia is a disorder of the esophagus. The lower esophageal sphincter fails to relax and increases the loss of body peristalsis. It is an uncommon disease worldwide. Data regarding its treatment are derived mostly from North America and European countries. Few data regarding this treatment were available in Asia and no data about using botulinum toxin injection for this disease was available in Thailand.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of botulinum toxin in achalasia in Thai patients.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

Eleven achalasia adult Thai patients with a mean age of 56.5 +/- 16.9 were studied. There are nine females and two males. The duration of symptom before treatment was 27.5 +/- 34.5 months. All patients receiving botulinum toxin injection at Siriraj hospital between 2001 and 2006 were retrospectively reviewed. Pretreatment of baseline lower esophageal sphincter, symptom score and body weight were compared. Time to second botulinum toxin injection or the need to receive treatment for recurrence was recorded to evaluate the time of recurrence. Adverse events from this procedure were collected.

RESULTS

Eleven patients were involved in this study. One patient that received 40 units of botulinum toxin showed no response after a six months follow up. The other ten patients received botulinum toxin 80 units for each session and were enrolled in this study. All ten patients demonstrated good response to the first botulinum toxin injection and subsequent injections. Four patients received only one session of botulinum toxin injection during study period. Meanwhile, five patients received two sessions and only one patient required four sessions. Symptom score of all ten patients improved significantly compared with pretreatment score (7.3 +/- 1.3 for pretreatment and 0.4 +/- 0.5, 0.9 +/- 0.7 and 1.6 +/- 1.3 after 2 weeks, 3 months and 6 months, respectively). Body weight increased significantly when compared with pretreatment (47.7 +/- 6.5 Kg for pretreatment and 49.2 +/- 5.8, 50.5 +/- 6.4, and 50.7 +/- 5.8 Kg after 2 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months, respectively). Previous treatments prior botulinum toxin injection do not seem to influence the effect of this treatment. Mean time of recurrence is 444 +/- 132 days (270-718 days). Minor adverse events such as chest pain and reflux symptoms were seen in this therapy.

CONCLUSION

Botulinum toxin injection in Thai achalasia patients is an effective, simple, and safe treatment. These results showed the similar outcomes as in Caucasian patients.

Review article: the management of achalasia - a comparison of different treatment modalities

BACKGROUND

Achalasia is an uncommon primary oesophageal motor disorder with an unknown aetiology. Therapeutic options for achalasia are aimed at decreasing the lower oesophageal sphincter pressure, improving the oesophageal empting, and most importantly, relieving the symptoms of achalasia. Modalities for treatment include pharmacologic, endoscopic, pneumatic dilatation and surgical. The decision of which modality to use involves the consideration of multiple clinical and economic factors.

AIM

To review the management strategies currently available for achalasia.

METHODS

A Medline search identified the original articles and reviews the published in the English language literature between 1966 and 2006.

RESULTS

The results reveal that pharmacotherapy, injection of botulinum toxin, pneumatic dilatation and minimally invasive surgical oesophagomyotomy are variably effective at controlling the symptoms of achalasia but that each modality has specific strengths and weaknesses which make them each suitable in certain populations. Overall, pharmacologic therapy results in the shortest lived, least durable response followed by botulinum toxin injection, pneumatic dilatation and surgery, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The optimal treatment for achalasia remains an area of controversy given our lack of complete understanding about the pathophysiology of the disease as well as the high numbers of clinical relapse after treatment. Further research focusing on optimal dosing of botulinum toxin injection and optimal timing of repeated graduated pneumatic dilatations could add to our knowledge regarding long-term therapy.

Treatment with botulinum toxin of octo-nonagerians with oesophageal achalasia: a two-year follow-up study

BACKGROUND

Treatment of oesophageal achalasia with intrasphincteric injections of botulinum toxin has proved to be a successful alternative treatment modality. However, little is known about its long-term effects in very old patients.

AIM

To evaluate the effects of such treatment in octo-nonagerians during a 2-year follow-up period.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-three patients with idiopathic oesophageal achalasia (range 81-94 years) entered the study. After basal evaluation and screening procedures, 100 U of botulinum toxin was injected at the lower oesophageal sphincter, and the procedure was repeated 1 month later. Data were collected at baseline and were compared after 1 and 2 years following the procedure.

RESULTS

Seventy-eight per cent of patients were considered responders at 1 year and 54% were considered responders at 2 years. The weight gain at the end of the follow-up period was 2 (0-3) kg. No significant relationship was found between baseline lower oesophageal sphincter pressure and symptoms score after 1 and 2 years of follow-up; moreover, no major complications of botulinum toxin therapy were reported.

CONCLUSION

Treatment of very old achalasic patients with botulinum toxin is safe, effective and yields good quality of life in a substantial proportion of these subjects.

Controversies in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux and achalasia

The immense success of laparoscopic surgery as an effective treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and achalasia has established minimal invasive surgery as the gold standard for these two conditions with lower morbidity and mortality, shorter hospital stay, faster convalescence, and less postoperative pain. One controversy in the treatment of GERD evolves around laparoscopic antireflux surgery (LARS) as the preferred treatment for Barrett’s esophagus and the procedure’s potential to reduce the risk of adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. GERD has also been associated with respiratory symptoms, asthma and laryngeal injury, and a second controversy prompts discussions about whether total or partial fundoplication is the more appropriate treatment for GERD. A new and promising alternative in the treatment of GERD is endoluminal therapy. Three types of this new treatment option will be discussed: radiofrequency energy delivered to the lower esophageal sphincter, the creation of a mechanical barrier at the gastroesophageal junction, and the direct endoscopic tightening of the lower esophageal sphincter.

Laparoscopic surgery is discussed not only as a very effective treatment for GERD but also as permanent cure for achalasia. This review analyzes the three most important treatment options for achalasia: medications, pneumatic dilatation, and surgical therapy. Medications as the only true non-invasive option in the treatment of achalasia are not as effective as LARS because of their short half-life and variable absorption due to the poor esophageal emptying. The second treatment option, pneumatic dilatation, involves the stretching of the lower esophagus and is still considered the most effective non-surgical treatment for achalasia. Finally, surgical therapy for achalasia and the two major controversies concerning this laparoscopic treatment are discussed. The first involves the extent to which the myotomy is extended onto the stomach, and the second concerns the necessity and type of antireflux procedure to prevent GERD after myotomy.

LARS and laparoscopic Heller myotomy are the agreed upon as the gold standards for surgical treatment of GERD and achalasia, respectively. In the hands of an experienced laparoscopic surgeon both are safe and effective treatments for patients with excellent subjective and objective long-term results with at least 90% patient satisfaction.

Achalasia

Surgical therapy (Heller myotomy) is the most effective treatment to relieve dysphagia associated with achalasia. The advent of minimally invasive techniques, specifically the laparoscopic approach, significantly reduced the morbidity of surgical therapy, making it the procedure of choice for most patients who have achalasia. Pneumatic dilatation is a viable alternative, though is associated with inferior results and a higher risk of esophageal perforation than surgical therapy. Pharmacotherapy and Botox provide inferior results and should be reserved for temporizing therapy, or for patients who are deemed too frail for surgical intervention. For best results, a laparoscopic myotomy should be carried at least 3 cm onto the stomach, and a partial fundoplication should be performed to reduce the incidence of postoperative GE reflux.

[Frequency of side effects after botulinum toxin A injections in neurology, rehabilitation and gastroenterology]

Botulinum toxin type A is one of the most potent biological toxins, recently used clinically (Botox, Dysport) for wide range of indications. THE AIM OF THE STUDY was to assess the frequency and severity of side effects during BTX-A therapy for different indications and underlying possible mechanisms.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Material consisted of 327 patients (F202, M125) who underwent 1043 sessions of BTX-A injections for: cervical dystonia--CD (n=58), blepharospasm--BLP (n=31), hemifacial spasm--HFS (n=39), spasticity due to cerebral palsy--CP (n=96), chronic anal fissure--CAF (n=96), esophageal achalasia--AE (n=7).

RESULTS

In CD the following side effects were observed: dysphagia (27% of patients and 7% of sessions), weakness of neck muscles (6.7% and 1.3%), pain during swallowing (5.1% and 1%), flu-like syndrome (3.4%, 0.7%). Dysphagia appeared 8.2 days after injection and lasted 14.9 days on average. In BLP authors noticed: unilateral ptosis (22%, 6.3%), bilateral ptosis (3%, 1.9%), haematoma (3%, 0.6%) and in HFS: excessive weakness resulting in asymmetry of face--mild (28.2% and 20%) and moderate (46% and 26.7%). In spasticity due to CP authors noticed: excessive weakness of lower limbs which lasted 13.8 days on average (6.2% and 1.9%), pain (5.2% and 1.6%), flu-like syndrome (4.1% and 1.3%). In CAF: mild incontinence of the flatus and faeces (9% and 5% of sessions), haematoma (5%), flu-like syndrome (3%), inflammation of external anal varices (2%), epididymitis (1%). In AE: chest pain in 6 (at the day of injection and lasted 2-4 days) and reflux in 2 patients (4-8 weeks after injection, lasted 2-3 weeks) were observed.

CONCLUSION

Therapy with BTX-A is a very safe procedure, especially when compared with high rate of effectiveness of injections. The side effects are transient, mostly local and completely reversible.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle injection

With the development of linear array echoendoscopes and the ability to perform endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine-needle aspiration, the delivery of therapeutic agents with fine-needle injection (FNI) emerged. EUS-guided FNI is an attractive delivery system because of its minimal invasiveness and low complication rate. This approach is effective in performing celiac plexus neurolysis for pain relief in patients with pancreatic cancer. The most exciting area of interest involves the delivery of antitumor agents in patients with locally advanced cancer, such as cancer of the pancreas or esophagus. The involvement of EUS-guided FNI in tumor therapy adds a host of potential new applications that continue to swing the pendulum of EUS from a diagnostic to a therapeutic modality.

Botulinum toxin injection versus laparoscopic myotomy for the treatment of esophageal achalasia: economic analysis of a randomized trial

BACKGROUND

The treatment of esophageal achalasia is still controversial: current therapies are palliative and aim to relieve dysphagia by disrupting or relaxing the lower esophageal sphincter muscle fibers with botulinum toxin. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical and economic results of two such treatments: laparoscopic myotomy and botulinum toxin injection.

METHODS

A total of 37 patients with esophageal achalasia were randomly assigned to receive laparoscopic myotomy (20) or two Botox injections 1 month apart (17). All patients were treated at the same hospital and were part of a larger multicenter study. Symptom score, lower esophageal sphincter pressure, and esophageal diameter at barium swallow were compared. The economic analysis was performed considering only the direct costs (cost per treatment and cost effectiveness, i.e., cost per patient healed).

RESULTS

Mortality and morbidity were nil in both groups. The actuarial probability of being asymptomatic at 2 years was 90% for surgery and 34% for Botox (p < 0.05). The initial cost was lower for Botox (1,245 Euros) than for surgery (3,555 Euros), but when cost effectiveness at 2 years was considered, this difference nearly disappeared: Botox 3,364 Euros, surgery 3,950 Euros.

CONCLUSION

Botox is still the least costly treatment, but the minimal difference in the longer term does not justify its use, given that surgery is a risk-free, definitive treatment.

Allgrove syndrome: when a recognisable paediatric disorder occurs in adulthood

We report a man with longstanding undiagnosed adrenal insufficiency. At 37, our patient is the oldest reported case. Although most cases of Allgrove syndrome are diagnosed during childhood, awareness of this condition when undiagnosed in adults is crucial, as it is life threatening, and can severely affect neurological, sexual and psychological function.

Cost-assessment of alternative management strategies for achalasia

Achalasia is a primary oesophageal motor disorder characterised by the abnormal relaxation of the lower oesophageal sphincter (LES) and absent oesophageal peristalsis. It is a rare disease, with an estimated incidence of approximately 1/100,000 and a prevalence close to 10/100,000 [1]. Its exact aetiology remains unknown. Autoimmune, infectious, degenerative and hereditary processes have all been proposed as factors that lead to a chronic inflammatory response in the myenteric plexus, thus resulting in selective loss of inhibitory neurons [2] and failure of the LES to relax and aperistalsis in the body of the oesophagus. The most common symptoms of achalasia are dysphagia for solids and liquids, regurgitation, chest pain, weight loss and heartburn in > 90 approximately 75, 40 - 50, approximately 60, approximately 40%, respectively [3,4]. The diagnosis is based on symptoms, barium swallow and manometry. A barium oesophagram typically shows a dilated oesophagus that tapers into a 'bird-beak' at the gastro-oesophageal junction with lack of normal peristalsis on fluoroscopic evaluation. The characteristic manometric features of achalasia are abnormal LES relaxation and aperistalsis; additionally, the LES pressure is frequently high, but can also be normal. Current practice of medicine is faced with rising healthcare costs and limited budgets [5]. We are therefore confronted with an increasing demand to justify the value of our therapeutic interventions, not only from the risk/benefit standpoint but also from the cost perspective [6,7].

Nitrates for achalasia

BACKGROUND

Achalasia is a disease that impairs oesophageal motility. Though nitrates have been used to treat achalasia for a long time, the effectiveness of nitrates for achalasia is still controversial.

OBJECTIVES

To quantify short-term and long-term effects of nitrate therapy in patients with achalasia.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Trials were identified by searching the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (Issue 4-2001), MEDLINE (1966-2001), EMBASE (1980-2001), LILACS - Latin American and Caribbean health science literature (1982-2001) and CBM-Chinese Biomedical database(1980-2000). Additionally, all references in the identified trials were checked for further relevant trials. An updated search was run on the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, and EMBASE in September 2003 - no new trials were found.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials involving achalasic patients given any type of nitrates were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data were extracted by two independent observers based on the intention to treat principle.

MAIN RESULTS

Two randomised cross-over studies were found, but no results are included. Due to the design of the studies and the method of reporting the results in the original paper it was not possible to extract the necessary information to examine any of the outcomes.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

We can conclude no implications for practice at this stage. Appropriately designed parallel group randomised controlled trials with long term follow-up are needed to determine the effects of nitrates.

Treatment of patients with achalasia with botulinum toxin: a multicenter prospective cohort study

Botulinum toxin (BT) injection is an alternative treatment of achalasia. The aim of the study was to examine outcomes of patients treated with BT in the Czech Republic. Since 1997, 49 patients with achalasia have been treated with BT. We prospectively evaluated the effect of BT injection on 41 patients during a median follow-up of 24 months (range 9-62). Esophageal manometry was performed before and at 3-5 months after the injection. In 16 patients, BT was injected from the antegrade angle only (subgroup A), in 15 patients, BT was injected from both retrograde and antegrade angles (subgroup B) and, in 10 patients, BT injection was combined with subsequent balloon dilatation (subgroup C). Immediate clinical response was achieved in 93% of patients. Clinical remission was sustained beyond 3 months in 83% of patients (responders). Fourteen responders (41%) did not experience a relapse during the median of 22 months. Twenty responders (59%) experienced symptomatic relapse approximately 8 months after the injection. Ten relapsers underwent BT reinjection, five (50%) of them were asymptomatic for another 14 months. The remaining five (50%) patients reported a second relapse approximately 6 months after the reinjection. Median duration of the symptom-free period was 11.5 months after the first BT injection, and 10.5 months after the second (P = 0.21). We did not find any significant predictor of a favorable outcome; responders tended to be older and to have a lower basal lower-esophageal-sphincter pressure. Patients in subgroup C were more likely to be in remission at 1 and 2 years as compared with patients in subgroup A. BT injection is an effective treatment of achalasia in the short term. However, almost 70% of patients experience a relapse within 2 years. BT injection should therefore be reserved for patients at risk for more invasive procedures or for patients who prefer this treatment.

A modified method of botulinum toxin injection in patients with achalasia: a pilot trial

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Injection of botulinum toxin (BT) from direct vision into the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) lowers its basal tone and improves symptomatology in most of the patients with achalasia. We hypothesized that the effect could be improved by better degree of LES infiltration by toxin administered from both prograde and retrograde views. The aim of the study was to investigate the feasibility, safety and efficacy of this modified method of intrasphincteric BT injection in patients with achalasia.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

Sixteen patients with achalasia were treated with BT injection. Hundred units of BT (Botox) were diluted with 4 ml of normal saline. Aliquots of 0.5 ml were injected into four quadrants of the LES from retrovision and then into each quadrant from direct vision. The patients were followed up for a median of 25.5 months (range 19-31).

RESULTS

No serious adverse events were noted. All patients responded well to the injection within one week and 3 patients (18.7 %) experienced an early relapse. The remaining 13 patients were classified as responders. After a single BT injection, 11 responders reported a relapse and 2 patients remained asymptomatic. The median symptom-free interval was 17 months (8-28). Five patients with a relapse underwent BT reinjection. Three of them remained asymptomatic and two experienced the second relapse. After BT reinjection, the median symptom-free interval was 16 months (10-19). All other patients with a relapse and without BT reinjection were treated with either balloon dilatation or surgery and are currently asymptomatic.

CONCLUSION

Combining injection of BT into the LES from both direct vision and retrovision was feasible, safe and produced a rapid response which was sustained for more than 1 year in the majority of patients. This method of BT administration might be superior to the traditional injection from direct view only, and a randomized and prospective study comparing those techniques of administration should be performed.

Intrasphincteric botulinum toxin injection in the treatment of chagasic achalasia

According to the WHO, 16-18 million people in Central and South America are infected by Trypanosoma cruzi. Chagasic achalasia affects between 7.1% and 10.6% of the population. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of Botox injections in the clinical response and esophageal function of patients with dysphagia due to chagasic achalasia. In total, 24 symptomatic patients with chagasic achalasia were randomly chosen to receive Botulinum Toxin (BT) or saline injected by endoscopy in the lower esophageal sphincter (LES). Patients were monitored with a clinical score of dysphagia and an objective assessment (esophagograms, scintillography, manometry, and nutritional assessment) for a period of 6 months. Clinical improvement of dysphagia was statistically significant (P < 0.001) in patients receiving BT when compared with the placebo. There was no significant difference in the placebo group regarding clinical score, LES basal pressure and esophageal emptying time. Esophageal emptying time in the toxin group was significantly lower than in the placebo (P=0.04) after 90 days. There were non-significant increases in esophageal emptying of 25.36% and 17.39%, respectively, at 90 and 180 days, in the BT group (P=0.266). Gender, age, and baseline LES pressure did not influence the response to BT. Our data strongly suggests that intrasphincteric injection of BT in LES is clinically effective in the treatment of chagasic achalasia.

Pneumothorax complicating botulinum toxin injection in the body of a dilated oesophagus in achalasia

Botulinum toxin is used for an increasing number of indications in the field of gastroenterology. We report a case in which injection of botulinum toxin in the dilated tubular oesophagus in a patient with achalasia was complicated by a pneumothorax necessitating suction drainage.

Evaluation of scar formation after botulinum toxin injection or forced balloon dilation to the lower esophageal sphincter

BACKGROUND

It has been postulated that nonsurgical treatments for achalasia cause fibrosis, increasing the risk of surgical Heller myotomy. The goal of this study was to evaluate fibrosis, muscle fracture, and esophageal inflammation after these treatments.

METHODS

Eighteen female swine were divided into three groups: 6 were euthanized and their lower esophageal sphincters were harvested (group 1); 6 underwent botulinum toxin injection (group 2); and 6 underwent forced balloon dilatation (group 3). Groups 2 and 3 were euthanized 30 days later and LESs harvested. LESs, were evaluated with trichrome and hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) preparations.

RESULTS

Results for both trichrome and H&E slides were the same: severe inflammation in groups 2 and 3 but only minimal inflammation in group 1 (p <0.05) and mild fibrosis in groups 2 and 3 and none in group 1 (p <0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Botulinum toxin injection and forced balloon dilatation caused significant inflammation in the esophagus of the swine, which would be consistent with the injury caused by reflux. Forced balloon dilatation and botulinum toxin caused fibrosis and may increase surgical risk.

Intrasphincteric botulinum toxin versus pneumatic balloon dilation for treatment of primary achalasia

GOALS

Despite a high success rate, pneumatic dilatation for achalasia is accompanied by a significant risk of esophageal perforation. Injection of botulinum toxin (botox) into the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) can lead to improvement in symptoms with reduced risk of complications. Direct comparisons of the two techniques are needed to define their role in clinical management.

STUDY

We compared pneumatic dilatation to botox for patients with achalasia using a double blind, randomized study design. Patients underwent clinical, manometric, radiographic and endoscopic evaluation to confirm primary achalasia. They were randomized to receive either 80 units of botox into the LES or Witzel balloon dilatation. Patients also received sham dilatation or injection, respectively. The patients and investigators assessing symptom response were blinded to therapy. Symptoms and esophageal function were assessed at 3 weeks, 3 months and 1 year after therapy. Treatment failure was defined as the lack of decrease in symptom grade more than 1 or recurrence of symptoms. Patients with treatment failure crossed over to the alternative treatment.

RESULTS

Thirty four patients were studied, and 31 completed the trial. Of the 18 patients randomized to Witzel dilatation, 16 (89%) of 18 remained in clinical remission. Of the two patients with treatment failure, one responded to botox injection. Of the 16 patients randomized to botox, (38%) 6 of 16 remained in clinical remission. Four patients had initial failure, and 6 relapsed at a mean of 4 months after therapy. Of the nine patients who crossed over to dilatation, seven responded well, but two required surgical management of perforation. Although both treatments had excellent initial clinical improvement, patients randomized to Witzel dilatation had superior long-term success ( < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Initial therapy with Witzel dilatation is associated with better long-term outcome than a single injection of botox. Because of the risk of endoscopic perforation, botox remains a viable alternative to dilatation.