[Historical aspects of external fixation and possibilities for the future developement]

External fixation is not such a novel method, but it is interesting to learn its history, countries in which it has developed and the time when it gained full expert acceptance in treating not only fractures but orthopedic disorders, inequalities, and articular arthrodeses. The beginnings of external fixation are associated to the name of Malgaigne, followed by the authors of Western European, German and American school of external fixation. In the U.S.A., this method was accepted as late as in 1950s; being accepted in Russia through Ilizarov. In our country, the method was accepted in 1950s, through the work of Prof. Bumbaireviae and Prof. Raduloviae, who are the founders of modem external fixation in our country.

Orthodontics in 3 millennia. Chapter 14: surgical adjuncts to orthodontics

Around 1970, after overcoming obstacles related to anesthesia, infection, and blood supply, orthognathic surgeons come into their own. The history of cleft lip and palate treatment has a much earlier beginning because a deformed infant evokes a strong desire to intervene. Angle's belief that orthodontists can grow bone finally came to fruition with the advent of distraction osteogenesis, which developed from the limb-lengthening procedures of Ilizaroff in Russia. Now distraction osteogenesis has replaced osteotomies in many applications.

Mandibular fractures: Historical perspective

The principles of the treatment of mandibular fractures have changed recently, although the objective of re-establishing the occlusion and masticatory function remains the same. Splinting of teeth is an old way of immobilising fractures but the advent of modern biomaterials has changed clinical practice towards plating the bone and early restoration of function. We present a brief historical overview of techniques and systems that have been used for stabilisation of mandibular fractures.

From unstable internal fixation to biological osteosynthesis. A historical overview of operative fracture treatment

The first techniques of operative fracture treatment were developed in the 19th century. In fact, these methods only consisted of an open reduction of the fracture followed by a usually very unstable fixation. This method gave rise to the combination of the disadvantages of the conservative and the operative fracture treatment: the fracture had to be opened with a real risk for (sometimes lethal) infection, the bone healing was disturbed, there was muscular atrophy and joint stiffness. The successes were very rare and catastrophes were often seen. Küntscher's endomedullary rods can be considered as the first useful implants in the treatment of diaphyseal fractures. Reaming of the medullary canal and the development of interlocking nails have enlarged the indications for intramedullary nailing. The classic Dynamic Compression Plates from the seventies were the key to a very rigid fixation, leading to primary bone healing. Nevertheless, the use of strong plates and reamed nails disturbed the vascularisation of the bone fragments, leading to a high infection rate (particularly in open fractures) and delayed union (particularly after plate and screw fixation). These insights lead to the development of the "biological osteosynthesis" : a terminology introduced to indicate a new type of osteosynthesis leading to a sufficiently stable fixation of the bone fragments allowing early mobilisation, but without major disturbance of the vascularisation. The unreamed nail can also be considered as a biological osteosynthesis and in a lot of cases it is the implant of choice for tibial and femoral shaft fractures, especially in polytrauma patients. Finally, some new devices contributing to the principles of biological osteosynthesis like locking plates and the LIS-System are gaining popularity.

Evolution of posterior cervical and occipitocervical fusion and instrumentation

The past several decades have been the setting for a remarkable evolution of spinal instrumentation technology. The advancements that have been made have allowed previously complex disorders of the cervical spine, the atlantoaxial articulation, and the occipitocervical junction to be managed more effectively with direct methods of internal fixation and arthrodesis. This has resulted in improvements in patient outcomes and fusion success rates. The improved strength of instrumentation constructs allows minimal, if any, external bracing, obviating the need for a halo orthosis in many cases. In this paper the authors review key events that have occurred in neuroimaging, biomechanical testing, and the development of fusion and instrumentation constructs.

The history of external fixation

Even though external fixation is considered to be a rather "new" trend in orthopedics and traumatology, in fact it has been something used by physicians and surgeons for thousands of years. In the mid 1800's, external fixation would see some substantial growth and evolution, pioneered by physicians and surgeons whose principles are still in use today. Through the 1900's, the indications and usage would continue to expand, not to mention the modernization of the external fixation apparatus. Many surgeons in this era are notable for their work with external fixation, especially Gavriel Ilizarov, considered to be the father of external fixation. Further research and development with external fixation needs to be performed and, with time, will more than likely become fully integrated into modern clinical practice.

External fixation indications and patient selection

Since its modest beginnings in the mid-nineteenth century, external fixation has seen great changes in its design and application. Once thought of as chiefly a fracture management tool, this modality has found its way into the arenas of corrective osteotomies, Charcot management, limb lengthening, nonunion treatment, and malalignment correction. As external fixation has evolved, great improvements in associated complications have also occurred. This is attributed to evolving frame design, subsequent increased stability, and advances in pin/wire insertion techniques. Paley and Herzenberg describe three factors to consider when evaluating whether to use external or internal fixation [2]. 1. Risk versus benefit of the method used for that specific indication. 2. Surgeon's experience with the specific method. 3. Ability to treat the potential complications of the surgery. The authors agree with these factors but would also include psychological tolerance, compliance with postoperative self-treatment, and personal hygiene. In this article the indications for external fixation were described in terms of pathology and individual patient factors were discussed for the surgeon's consideration. The surgeon must consider the patient's bone quality, age, cognitive ability, psychological tolerance, and compliance level. With these factors kept in mind and evaluated appropriately, the surgeon should be able to select the patient and indications for which external fixation will yield a superior result.

Preoperative reduction of spondylolisthesis

The treatment of SL, especially in some cases, is mostly surgical. This lesion can be considered an extremely localised kyphosis (only two vertebrae) or a localized (sub-)luxation: at most hearetically pre-operative reduction should represent the first stage of the treatment, also because reduction makes further surgery easier and enables us to obtain the best results. After a glance at the various surgical techniques that have been used in the past, we describe our method of preoperative reduction in case of severe SL, an improvement of Scaglietti's original technique. According to the parameters taken into consideration, spondylolisthesis (SL) of the 4th and, above all, the 5th lumber vertebrae can be considered, especially in severe cases, as kyphosis or displacement (or even dislocation in the case of ptosis). In SL-kyphosis the antero posterior axes of the contiguous vertebral bodies are no longer parallel but tend to over-impose one to the other anteriorly forming an open posterior angle of varying degrees. It is an extremely short kyphosis (only two vertebrae) but from all points of view, even therapeutic, it reflects the characteristics of all types of vertebral kyphosis. SL-subluxation or SL-luxation (ptosis) is characterized by the respectively partial or total loss of normal alignment between the vertebrae involved. This can be explained by the fact that nearly all those who have dealt with the problem of treating SL, especially of L5, always ask themselves beforehand if it is possible and/or opportune to eliminate or improve the condition before surgery. In other words the question of reduction (pre or intraoperative, partial or total) of more or less severe L5 SL is always considered by all authors, even if their conclusions are often in disagreement.

[Fritz König (1866-1952): pioneer of osteosynthesis and his influence on traumatology]

Fritz König (1866-1952) was 1918-1935 ordinary professor of surgery at the University of Wuerzburg. A main interest of his work was the technique and indication of osteosynthesis. Since 1900 he investigated methods (wire suture, intra- and extramedullary splint, external fixator, plate) and materials (ivory, steel; wire, screws). All his life he aimed to standardize the technique of osteosynthesis, to work out and spread clear indications for the surgical treatment of fractures, and to carry his point against the resistance of the social accident insurance caused by bad results of a lot of surgeons. His importance is not based on the invention of a great deal of instruments but on his endeavour for the fundamentals of osteosynthesis.

Hyphenated history: Knight-Taylor spinal orthosis

This paper offers some interesting biographic information on the two men from whom the Knight-Taylor spinal orthosis takes its name. James Knight and Charles Taylor were two orthopedists from New York City who were interested in spinal care. They prescribed and fashioned their distinctive braces, aspects of which were combined by others, thus linking these two men in orthopedic hyphenated history.

[Pioneers in the lengthening of the extremities]

Successful lengthening of the extremities was first published at the beginning of the twentieth century. Those reports in which methods such as the distraction of fragments, callus or epiphysis were mentioned for the first time are reviewed. Lengthening of the extremities by epiphyseal distraction was first mentioned by Bernhard v. Langenbeck in 1869 in an animal experiment. The publications of Codivilla, who introduced lengthening by fragment distraction, Kirschner, Bier and others are cited and analyzed critically. Thus, the historical development of the lengthening of the extremities is reported from 1869 to the middle of the twentieth century.

[Bone lengthening. History of the development and field of applications]

Leg lengthening has been performed since early in this century. The first successful lengthening was reported in 1905. Leg lengthening evolved from forced lengthening of the bone during anaesthesia, through use of cortical bone grafts, plate and screws to callus distraction (callotasis). Development of external fixators and evolution of biological concepts of bone regeneration has been important. In 1951 Ilizarov developed his apparatus. Ilizarov pioneered the biology of bone and soft-tissue regeneration. He performs a percutaneous subperiosteal corticotomy and waits five to seven days prior to distraction with a rate of 0.25 mm of length four times each day. The method has increased the opportunities in reconstructive bone surgery. The technique is difficult with many problems and obstacles which can be overcome.

Limb reconstruction after high energy trauma

Limb reconstruction techniques rely on stable external fixation to provide early limb function after major long bone injury. Bone may be generated by callus distraction techniques and internal techniques of moving bone segments used to fill bone defects. Soft tissue defects may be treated by acute shortening, although skin defects will also close spontaneously during bone transport as the leading edge of bone is covered with granulation tissue. External fixation is also used to cross joints permitting rest and repair of the joint. Hinges placed within the bars of the fixation frame may be used to correct deformities in the bone and soft tissue contractures using closed distraction techniques. These techniques are appropriate to metaphyseal fractures and diaphyseal fractures with bone loss. A major advantage is the lack of donor site morbidity, associated with skin flaps and large bone grafts. Acceptance of these techniques is growing whilst the methodology continues to improve. In more complicated cases, specialist training and dedicated hospital units with multidisciplinary support is desirable.

Callus distraction: a new method? A historical review of limb lengthening

The technique of callus distraction can be traced back to the work of Codivilla at the beginning of the century. Subsequent to Codivilla, various crude methods of limb lengthening were used but resulted in high complication rates. Not until the work of Putti and Abbott in the 1920s and their painstaking operative technique did the results become verifiable. During the 1930s, various modifications were introduced and the apparatus was simplified. However, because of an increasing tendency to apply this technique to unsuitable cases, it fell into disrepute. After World War II, Anderson, Allan, and Ilizarov developed better equipment, allowing for a better understanding of the biologic principles of callus distraction. In the 1980s, this method was adopted for treatment of major bone defects and shortening of limbs.

Development of the small AO fixator to the current set

An indirect system to reduce and hold comminuted fractures of the distal radius was developed in the mid 1970's starting with a simple threaded distraction rod and advancing to a versatile system of rods and universal clamps. This system has gained wide acceptance since then and is used for the wrist joint and for other indications in surgery of the hand, the upper limb, the foot and in paediatric orthopaedics.

History of external skeletal fixation

The concept of external skeletal fixation was introduced by Malgaigne in 1840, with a spike driven into the human tibia that was held by a strap encircling the limb. The first readily available external fixator, the Parkhill clamp, appeared in 1897. By the 1920s, a number of adaptations of pins or screws inserted into bone fragments for external control of reduction and fixation had been published. Important developments in that era were triangular half-pin units and anchoring bone pins in both cortices. The Stader splint, which was the first half-pin splint to provide reduction as well as fixation, was used by surgeons in the U.S. Navy during World War II. The Kirschner-Ehmer splint, a veterinary modification of the Anderson splint for humans, was introduced in 1947. Popularity of external skeletal fixation declined in the 1950s because of poor results that may have been caused by errors of application. Improvements in fixator configurations and the skill and judgment of surgeons led to the current acceptance of the method.

Leg lengthening: the historical perspective

An overview of lengthening is presented from the scarlet cloth through skeletal traction, screw distraction, and patient mobility. Unquestionably, significant advances have been made in the technology and techniques of lengthening legs, but more are yet to be made.