Patient evaluation of the use of follitropin alfa in a prefilled ready-to-use injection pen in assisted reproductive technology: an observational study

BACKGROUND

Self-administration of recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone (r-hFSH) can be performed using injection pen devices by women undergoing assisted reproductive technology procedures. The objective of this study was to explore the use of the prefilled follitropin alfa pen in routine assisted reproductive technology procedures in Germany.

METHODS

This prospective, observational study was conducted across 43 German IVF centres over a period of 1.75 years. Patients who had used the prefilled follitropin alfa pen in the current or a previous cycle of controlled ovarian stimulation completed a questionnaire to assess their opinions of the device.

RESULTS

A total of 5328 patients were included in the study. Of these, 2888 reported that they had previous experience of daily FSH injections. Significantly more patients reported that less training was required to use the prefilled follitropin alfa pen than a syringe and lyophilized powder (1997/3081 [64.8%]; p < 0.001 'less' versus 'more' training). Significantly more patients rated the prefilled follitropin alfa pen as easier in terms of use (2321/3206, 72.4%; p < 0.001 'much more easy' versus 'less easy') and daily injection (2384/3262, 73.1%; p < 0.001 'much more easy' versus 'less easy') than existing injection methods. Approximately one third of respondents rated the prefilled follitropin alfa pen as easier to use than the follitropin beta pen with reloadable cartridges. The majority (3378/4024, 83.9%) of patients had a general preference for the prefilled follitropin alfa pen over other injection methods.

CONCLUSIONS

In this questionnaire-based survey, routine use of the prefilled follitropin alfa pen was well accepted and associated with favourable patient perceptions. Users of the pen found it easier to initially learn how to use, and subsequently use, than other injection methods. In general, the prefilled follitropin alfa pen was the preferred method for self-administration of gonadotrophins. Together with previous findings, the results here indicate a high level of patient satisfaction among users of the prefilled follitropin alfa pen for daily self-administration of r-hFSH.

[Preparation and in vitro targeting of follicle stimulating hormone polypeptide modified nanoparticles]

OBJECTIVE

To prepare follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) polypeptide modified nanoparticles (NP) in order to achieve specific ovarian tumor targeting.

METHODS

Expression of FSH receptor protein in human liver cancer and ovarian cancer cell lines BEL-7402, SKOV-3 and Caov-3 was detected by immunocytochemistry. The polypeptide fragment of FSH beta 81-95 amino acids (FSHL81-95) was synthesized and covalently coupled to NP. The specific binding of FSHL81-95 and FSHL81-95-NP was examined by fluorescence microscopy and flow cytometry.

RESULTS

BEL-7402 and SKOV-3 cells were negative for FSH receptor staining, while Caov-3 cells were positive. The diameters of NP were about 100 nm, with a Zeta potential of -25 mV or so. Caov-3 cells showed a more specific interaction with FSHL81-95-NP than SKOV-3 cells (4.17 +/- 0.86 and 2.30 +/- 0.21; P < 0.05). The uptake of FSHL81-95-NP was more than NP in Caov-3 cells (4.17 +/- 0.86 and 0.41 +/- 0.32; P < 0.05). FSHL81-95-NP showed a selective targeting at Caov-3 cells compared with control NP.

CONCLUSION

FSH polypeptide modified NP could selectively target ovarian cancer cells expressing FSH receptor, which might contribute to specific endocytosis mediated by FSH receptor.

[Mono-follicular development--the objective of ovulation induction with follitropin beta combined with intrauterine insemination]

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effect of different starting follitropin's beta dose (50 IU, 75 IU and 100 IU daily) for ovulation induction combined with intrauterine insemination on mono-follicular development.

SUBJECT

Prospective study.

SETTING

Centre for Assisted Reproduction SANUS, Pardubice.

SUBJECT AND METHOD

From March 2005 to November 2007 we performed a total number of 111 ovarian stimulations for patients with unexplained infertility, anovulatory disorder or mild male factor. We divided patients into groups based on patient's response to clomifen citrate treatment. We examined follicular growth day 9 by transvaginal ultrasound and if necessary we adjusted gonadotropins's dose.

RESULTS

We performed 104 intrauterine inseminations (94% of cycles with ovulation induction). We proved mono-follicular development in 36%, 37% and 36% (ns), number of follicles 1,9 +/- 0,8, 2,2 +/- 1,2 and 2,5 +/- 1,8 (ns), endometrial thickness (mm) 8,5 +/- 1,2, 8,6 +/- 1,7 and 9,1 +/- 1,8 (ns), total dose of rFSH (IU) 440 +/- 156, 583 +/- 154 and 830 +/- 268 (p < 0.001) in 50 IU, 75 IU and 100 IU follitropin's beta groups. We achieved a total of 18 pregnancies (pregnancy rate 17%).

CONCLUSIONS

50 IU follitropin beta daily offers 36% probability of mono-follicular development. The disadvantage may be an increased risk of cycle cancellation due to low ovarian response. Daily doses 75 IU or 100 IU increase total consumption of rFSH.

Patient and nurse evaluation of recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone administration methods: comparison of two follitropin injection pens

OBJECTIVE

Ovarian stimulation by injection of gonadotrophins is an essential part of assisted reproductive technology (ART) protocols. Two studies (a German pilot study and an Australian study) aimed to assess and compare the ease-of-use, safety and efficacy of two follitropin injection pens.

METHODS

Patient satisfaction (questionnaire) and safety were assessed in patients undergoing ART at a German centre for in vitro fertilisation (IVF), randomised either to the follitropin alfa pen or to the follitropin beta pen. Patient satisfaction (questionnaire) was assessed in patients undergoing ART at an Australian IVF centre, using the follitropin alfa pen, and previous experience with the follitropin beta pen was compared. The experience of IVF nurses with both pens was assessed using a similar questionnaire. Statistical significance was not determined in either study.

RESULTS

In the German study (n = 31), patients favored the follitropin alfa pen over the follitropin beta pen because they found preparation faster, were more confident of accurate dosing and had to make fewer dose adjustments. Treatments delivered by both pens were well tolerated; eight adverse events (AEs) occurred, two AEs (including one case of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, OHSS) in two patients using the follitropin alfa pen and six AEs (including three cases of OHSS, one of which was serious) in six patients using the follitropin beta pen. Patients (n = 140) and nurses (n = 11) in the Australian study scored the follitropin alfa pen highly and patients favored it over the follitropin beta pen; the risk of OHSS was also considered greater in the follitropin beta pen group, with nearly a twofold higher rate of cycle cancellation due to OHSS risk compared with the follitropin alfa pen group.

CONCLUSIONS

Taken together, results from these two small studies suggest that the follitropin alfa pen was effective, well tolerated, and patient and nurse acceptance appeared to be higher for the follitropin alfa pen versus the follitropin beta pen, which may benefit compliance, leading to improved outcomes.

Initiation of GnRH antagonist on Day 1 of stimulation as compared to the long agonist protocol in PCOS patients. A randomized controlled trial: effect on hormonal levels and follicular development

BACKGROUND The optimal time for GnRH antagonist initiation is still debatable. The purpose of the current randomized controlled trial is to provide endocrine and follicular data during ovarian stimulation for IVF in patients with polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) treated either with a long GnRH agonist scheme or a fixed day-1 GnRH antagonist protocol. METHODS Randomized patients in both groups (antagonist: n = 26; long agonist: n = 52) received oral contraceptive pill treatment for three weeks and a starting dose of 150 IU of follitropin beta. The primary outcome was E(2) level on Day 5 of stimulation, while secondary outcomes were follicular development, LH during ovarian stimulation and progesterone levels. RESULTS Significantly more follicles on days 5, 7 and 8 of stimulation, significantly higher estradiol (E(2)) levels on days 1, 3, 5, 7 and 8 and significantly higher progesterone levels on days 1, 5 and 8 of stimulation were observed in the antagonist when compared with the agonist group. E(2) was approximately twice as high in the antagonist when compared with the agonist group on day 5 of stimulation (432 versus 204 pg ml(-1), P lt; 0.001). These differences were accompanied by significantly lower LH levels on days 3 and 5 and significantly higher LH levels on days 1, 7 and 8 of stimulation in the antagonist when compared with the agonist group. CONCLUSIONS In PCOS patients undergoing IVF, initiation of GnRH antagonist concomitantly with recombinant FSH is associated with an earlier follicular growth and a different hormonal environment during the follicular phase when compared with the long agonist protocol.

Economic evaluation of the administration of follitropin-beta with a pen device

Previous studies suggest that administration of follitropin-beta with a pen device (Puregon Pen(R)) is more convenient, less painful and 16-18% more efficient. The aim of this study was to perform an economic evaluation of the administration of follitropin-beta by this pen device against follitropin-alpha by multidose and highly purified (HP) HMG by conventional syringe in IVF treatment by comparing the process utilities and the costs for the Dutch setting. Conjoint analysis assessed the process utilities for the three administration modes on a scale from 0 to 1. A decision analytic model estimated the costs of an average IVF cycle from a societal perspective. Patients estimated the process utility at 0.96 for the pen, 0.53 for the multidose and 0.36 for the conventional syringe. Additional costs were estimated at 0 Euros and 194 Euros, comparing the pen with multidose or conventional methods respectively. Assuming a 16% efficiency gain of the pen, costs ranged from Euros-135 (savings) to 60 Euros (extra costs). In conclusion, patients perceive sufficient benefits to the pen device to choose it over other dosing methods. Dominance of the pen device over the multidose method was shown. Compared with the conventional administration method, the added value of the pen device was 2.7 (0.96/0.36) times higher.

Evaluation of a pen device for self-administration of recombinant human FSH in clomiphene citrate-resistant anovulatory women undergoing ovulation induction

This open-label multicentre study evaluated ease of use, safety, and efficacy of a pen device for self-administration of recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (rFSH) in 43 subjects undergoing ovulation induction. Follitropin beta was administered subcutaneously with the Follistim Pen within 3 days of onset of menses. A 75 IU starting dose could be increased by 25 or 50 IU on days 8 and 15 if no ovarian response was observed. Human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG; 10,000 IU) was administered when one follicle > or =18 mm or two to three follicles > or =15 mm were observed. Subjects received standardized instruction for the pen device and subject comprehension was recorded as subjects practised and prepared injections. Ease of use was also evaluated by questionnaire. Forty-four subjects enrolled; 43 were treated with rFSH and 41 were treated with HCG. The comprehension questionnaire revealed that during the mock injection, 100% of subjects properly loaded the cartridge into the pen device, while 95% selected the correct dose and 100% self-injected the medication prescribed. During the second actual injection, 100% of subjects comprehended these pen-related steps. The ease-of-use questionnaire showed that 100% of the subjects rated the overall experience of self-administering with the pen as 'very good' to 'good'. Mean duration and total amount of follitropin beta were 11.4 +/- 4.2 days and 1070.3 +/- 580.3 IU respectively. Ovulation rate was 95%. Biochemical and ongoing pregnancy rates per attempt were 34.9 and 30.2% respectively. Three subjects experienced serious adverse events [asthma; ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) and pain; OHSS]. In conclusion, the pen device provides an easy, safe, and effective way for women to self-administer follitropin beta during ovarian stimulation.

Comparison of two different fixed doses of follitropin-beta in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation: A prospective randomized, double blind clinical trial

A prospective randomized, double blind, single centre study was conducted to compare the efficacy, efficiency and clinical side effects of daily fixed dose regimen of either 100 IU or 200 IU of recombinant follicle stimulating hormone(rFSH) Follitropin beta in down-regulated women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation(COH) for either conventional in vitro fertilization(IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection(ICSI). A total of sixty women were randomly allocated according to the criteria for the treatment by either 100 IU(n = 30) or 200 IU (n = 30) of FSH. Although more cycle cancellations due to low response were observed in the 100 IU group (n = 9 vs n = 2), two cases of mild and moderate ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome were noted in the higher dose group. Subjects in the group treated with 200 IU appeared to yield more follicles > 17 mm (4.4 vs 3.3, p = 0.05) and more oocytes compared to the group treated with 100 IU (9.2 versus 6.0 oocytes, NS). The total dosage required to develop at least three follicles according to the protocol was significantly lower in the group treated with 100 IU (1203.33 versus 2106. 67, P < 0.0001). In conclusion, a fixed daily dose of 200 IU of rFSH Follitropin beta compared to a fixed daily dose of 100 IU is more effective in terms of follicles > 17 mm development and the number of oocytes retrieved along with a lower cancellation rate, but less efficient as indicated by a higher total rFSH dose needed

An open, randomized single-centre study to compare the efficacy and convenience of follitropin beta administered by a pen device with follitropin alpha administered by a conventional syringe in women undergoing ovarian stimulation for IVF/ICSI

BACKGROUND

A pen device, similar to an insulin pen, has been recently marketed for the administration of follitropin beta in cartridges. A randomized controlled trial was performed to compare the efficacy and convenience of this pen device delivering follitropin beta with a conventional syringe delivering follitropin alpha.

METHODS

A total of 200 patients needing IVF/ICSI treatment and willing to self-inject were enrolled in the study. All subjects had ovarian stimulation according to a long protocol and were randomized to the pen or the conventional syringe group during down-regulation by means of a computer-generated randomization list using random numbers. Patients were asked to fill in a daily local tolerance book after each injection. On the day of hCG the patients scored a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain and convenience.

RESULTS

The average duration, total dose of recombinant FSH and number of cumulus oocyte complexes retrieved were 10.8/12.0 days (P = 0.001), 1880/2226 IU (P < 0.001) and 15.2/13.1 respectively in the pen device and conventional syringe groups; the presence of pain after the daily injection was significantly higher in the conventional syringe group (P = 0.027); the visual analogue scale score was similar for pain but significantly more convenient for the pen device (P < 0.001). The live birth rate per embryo transfer was 32.9 and 34.4% respectively in the pen device and conventional syringe groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Self-injection with the pen device is safe and easy, more convenient and less painful for the patient, requires less FSH and shortens the treatment duration.

Concurrent ganirelix and follitropin beta therapy is an effective and safe regimen for ovulation induction in women with polycystic ovary syndrome

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate controlled ovarian stimulation cycles using the GnRH antagonist ganirelix in combination with the recombinant FSH, follitropin-beta, in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS).

DESIGN

Prospective, nonrandomized clinical study.

SETTING

Hospital-based infertility practice.

PATIENT(S)

Twenty women with PCOS planning to undergo ovarian stimulation.

INTERVENTION(S)

Fasting glucose and insulin levels were used to calculate insulin resistance ratios (FG/I). After pretreatment with oral contraceptives, serum LH levels were determined, and 250 microg ganirelix was administered on cycle day 2. Upon suppression of LH, concurrent ganirelix and follitropin-beta therapy (morning ganirelix and evening follitropin-beta) was started and continued until the day of hCG.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Days of stimulation, dose of follitropin-beta, pregnancy, and ongoing pregnancy were compared based on FG/I ratios.

RESULTS

One dose of ganirelix effectively suppressed LH levels in all patients. All patients ovulated as documented by a rise in progesterone. Significant differences were observed between the insulin-resistant and non-insulin-resistant groups for both days of stimulation and dose of follitropin-beta. The overall clinical pregnancy rate was 44.4%, with an ongoing pregnancy rate of 27.8%.

CONCLUSIONS

In this preliminary study, we demonstrate the effectiveness of a concurrent ganirelix and follitropin-beta therapy for ovarian stimulation in women with PCOS.

Administration of recombinant human FSH (solution in cartridge) with a pen device in women undergoing ovarian stimulation

This study evaluated the first multiple-use pen device for the self-administration of recombinant FSH. The pen device is used for the subcutaneous injection of a pre-mixed ready-to-use solution of follitropin beta from a multiple-dose cartridge, and has flexible dosing capabilities. In the ease-of-use questionnaire, 90% of subjects rated the overall experience of self-injecting follitropin beta using the pen device as 'very good' (on day 6). The comprehension questionnaire revealed that prior to the first injection and during the second injection, the follitropin beta cartridge was properly loaded into the pen device by 96.7 and 100% of the subjects respectively. The questionnaire also showed that the correct dose was selected and self-administered by 98.3 and 100% of the subjects respectively. Biochemical and ongoing pregnancy rates per attempt were 56.7 and 45.0% respectively. The pen device is safe, effective, and easy to use for self-administering recombinant FSH during ovarian stimulation.