Value Analysis of Methods of Inguinal Hernia Repair

OBJECTIVE

Value is defined as health outcomes important to patients relative to cost of achieving those outcomes: Value = Quality/Cost. For inguinal hernia repair, Level 1 evidence shows no differences in long-term functional status or recurrence rates when comparing surgical approaches. Differences in value reside within differences in cost. The aim of this study is to compare the value of different surgical approaches to inguinal hernia repair: Open (Open-IH), Laparoscopic (Lap-IH), and Robotic (R-TAPP).

METHODS

Variable and fixed hospital costs were compared among consecutive Open-IH, Lap-IH, and R-TAPP repairs (100 each) performed in a university hospital. Variable costs (VC) including direct materials, labor, and variable overhead ($/min operating room [OR] time) were evaluated using Value Driven Outcomes, an internal activity-based costing methodology. Variable and fixed costs were allocated using full absorption costing to evaluate the impact of surgical approach on value. As cost data is proprietary, differences in cost were normalized to Open-IH cost.

RESULTS

Compared to Open-IH, VC for Lap-IH were 1.02X higher (including a 0.81X reduction in cost for operating room [OR] time). For R-TAPP, VC were 2.11X higher (including 1.36X increased costs for OR time). With allocation of fixed cost, a Lap-IH was 1.03X more costly, whereas R-TAPP was 3.18X more costly than Open-IH. Using equivalent recurrence as the quality metric in the value equation, Lap-IH decreases value by 3% and R-TAPP by 69% compared to Open-IH.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of higher cost technology to repair inguinal hernias reduces value. Incremental health benefits must be realized to justify increased costs. We expect payors and patients will incorporate value into payment decisions.

Worldwide hernia repair: variations in the treatment of primary unilateral inguinal hernias in adults in the United Kingdom and in low- and middle-income countries

INTRODUCTION

In this invited commentary, we aim to quantify and explain the variation between, and also within, developed healthcare systems (using the UK as an example) and low- to middle-income countries (LMICs). Rather than including complex cases, we have looked only at 'uncomplicated' primary unilateral inguinal hernias, an area where limited variation may be identified.

METHODS

Data were obtained from Hospital Episode Statistics and structured surveys in the United Kingdom and in low- and middle-income countries.

CONCLUSION

There is widespread variation in the repair of 'uncomplicated' primary inguinal hernias worldwide and within developed healthcare systems.

Open and Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Surgery: A Cost Analysis

Background: In the treatment of inguinal hernias, there is little hard evidence concerning the economic reimbursement in the diagnosis-related group (DRG) era. Factors that affect whether a hospital may earn or lose financially depending on open or laparoscopic approach is still underexplored. The aim of this study was to provide a reliable analysis of in-hospital costs and reimbursements in inguinal hernia surgery. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed the 1-year experience in inguinal hernia repair in patients undergoing open Lichtenstein (OL), laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal unilateral (UTEP), or bilateral (BTEP) hernia repair. Demographics, results, costs, and DRG-based reimbursements were recorded and analyzed. Results: During the study period, 39 patients underwent OL, 82 patients UTEP, and 16 patients BTEP. The average total cost amounted to 4126 EUR in OL, 5134 EUR in UTEP, and 7082 EUR in BTEP groups (P < .001). The hospital reimbursement amounted to 5486 EUR, 5252 EUR, and 6555 EUR in the OL, UTEP, and BTEP groups, respectively (P < .001). Finally, the mean hospital earnings were 1360 EUR, 118 EUR, and -527 EUR for each patient in OL, UTEP, and BTEP, respectively (P < .001). Conclusions: In-hospital costs were higher in UTEP and BTEP as compared with OL. The DRG-based reimbursement provided adequate compensation for patients with unilateral inguinal hernia, whereas hospital earnings were profitable in OL group only, and led an overall financial loss in the BTEP group. Surgeons should be conscious that clinical advantages of the laparoscopic approach are not adequately compensated for, from an economic point of view.

Application of shaft method assisted biological mesh in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair

To compare the feasibility and advantage of traditional tiling method and shaft method to place biological mesh following laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernia.Sixty cases from January 2013 to January 2014 treated with laparoscopic inguinal hernia neoplasty with biological patches were included. All the cases were randomly divided into control group and observation group. Observation group was treated with shaft method to place biological mesh, while control group was treated with traditional tiling method. The length of the operation, hospital fees, and rate of occurrence of surgical complications were compared.All 60 cases were successfully treated with laparoscope inguinal hernia repair. None were converted to open operations. Total operation times for the observation group and control group were 54 ± 4.5 and 71 ± 7.2 minutes, respectively (P < .05). The hospital fees of the observation group and control group were 21,280 ± 365 RenMinBi Yuan (RMB) and 24,280 ± 428 RMB, respectively (P < .05). The rates of occurrence of surgical complications were 3.33% (1/30) and 16.7% (5/30), respectively (P < .05).The shaft method can be applied in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair with biological mesh. Compared with the traditional method, the shaft method has apparent advantages, fewer complications during and after the operation.

Patient classification and hospital reimbursement for inguinal hernia repair: a comparison across 11 European countries

PURPOSE

This comparative study examines the categorisation of patients undergoing surgical repair of inguinal hernia in the diagnosis-related group (DRG) systems of 11 European countries (Austria, England, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Ireland, the Netherlands, Poland, Spain and Sweden). Understanding the design and operation of DRG systems for this common surgical procedure is important, given their increasing use internationally for hospital reimbursement and performance measurement.

METHODS

A common definition was used to identify inguinal hernia patients and the corresponding data were extracted from national databases. The analysis compared the variables and algorithms for classifying these patients to DRGs across the participating countries, as well as the number, composition and relative resource intensity of groups. An index case and six standardised vignettes were grouped using each country’s DRG system and the associated quasi-prices were calculated.

RESULTS

The number of groups to which inguinal hernia patients are assigned is typically three or four, but ranges from two in Poland to ten in France. In most systems, categorising patients is contingent on procedure, principal and secondary diagnoses, and age, with treatment setting (day case/inpatient) being less common. Added to these, the French system also incorporates length of stay and whether the patient died. More resource intensive DRGs generally contained patients who were older, treated as inpatients, did not die, had (more severe) complications and/or co-morbidities, and/or underwent laparoscopic repair. There are cross-country disparities in day case rates and the use of laparoscopic repairs.

CONCLUSIONS

The categorisation of inguinal hernia patients varies across the 11 European DRG systems under study. By highlighting the main differences across these systems, this comparative analysis allows the relevant decision makers to assess the adequacy and specificity of their own DRG systems.

Cost-utility analysis comparing heavy-weight and light-weight mesh in laparoscopic surgery for unilateral inguinal hernias

BACKGROUND

Hernioplasty is one of the most frequent surgeries in the UK. Light-weight mesh (LWM) has the potential to reduce chronic groin pain but its cost-effectiveness compared with heavy-weight mesh (HWM) is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to conduct a cost-utility analysis between laparoscopic hernioplasty with HWM and LWM for unilateral inguinal hernias.

METHODS

A Markov model simulated costs and health outcomes over a period of 1 year (2012) from the societal and National Health Service (NHS) perspective (England). The main outcome was cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. Surgery results were gleaned from the randomized control trial by Bittner et al. Other input parameters were drawn from the literature and public sources of the NHS.

RESULTS

From the societal perspective, LWM induces lower incremental costs (-£88.85) than HWM but yields a slightly smaller incremental effect (-0.00094 QALYs). The deterministic incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for HWM compared with LWM amounts to £94,899 per QALY, while the probabilistic ICER is £118,750 (95 % confidence interval [CI] £57,603-180,920). Owing to the withdrawal of productivity losses from the NHS perspective, LWM causes higher incremental costs (£13.09) and an inferior incremental effect (-0.00093), resulting in a dominance of HWM over LWM (ICER 95 % CI -£12,382 to -£21,590).

CONCLUSIONS

There is no support for the adoption of LWM as standard treatment from an NHS perspective. However, given the small differences between HWM and LWM, LWM has at least the potential of improving patient outcomes and reducing expenditure from the societal perspective.

Explaining length of stay variation of episodes of care in the Netherlands

OBJECTIVES

Diagnosis Related Group (DRG) systems aim to classify patients into mutually exclusive groups of patients, with the patients in each group having the same expected length of stay (LOS). We examined the ability of current classification variables to explain LOS variation between DRG-like Diagnosis Treatment Combination (DBC)s for ten episodes of care in the Netherlands, including breast cancer, stroke and inguinal hernia repair. Additionally, we assessed the predictive ability of some other classification variables.

METHODS

For each episode of care, the relevant DBC codes of all hospitalizations in 2008 were identified and all available determinants that may serve as classification variables were acquired from the national database. Ordinary least squares regression was used to examine the predictive ability of these classification variables.

RESULTS

The current classification variables are not sufficiently distinct to classify patients into mutually exclusive groups of patients. ICU admissions and hospital type may serve as valuable classification variables. Additionally, episode-specific variables may improve the Dutch grouping algorithm.

CONCLUSIONS

Although it may not be feasible in the short term, grouping algorithms would benefit greatly from the introduction of classification variables tailored to the needs of specific episodes of care. A first step would be to focus on 'general' classification variables meaningful for specific episodes of care.

Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial for anterior inguinal hernia repair: transrectus sheath preperitoneal mesh repair compared to transinguinal preperitoneal procedure

BACKGROUND

Anterior open treatment of the inguinal hernia with a tension-free mesh has reduced the incidence of hernia recurrence. The Lichtenstein procedure is the current reference technique for inguinal hernia treatment. Chronic pain has become the main postoperative complication after surgical inguinal hernia repair, especially following Lichtenstein. Preliminary experiences with a soft mesh positioned in the preperitoneal space (PPS) by transinguinal preperitoneal (TIPP) or total extraperitoneal (TEP) technique, showed promising results considering the reduction of postoperative chronic pain. Evolution of surgical innovations for inguinal hernia repair led to an open, direct approach with preperitoneal mesh position, such as TIPP. Based on the TIPP procedure, another preperitoneal repair has been recently developed, the transrectus sheath preperitoneal (TREPP) mesh repair.

METHODS

The ENTREPPMENT trial is a multicentre randomized clinical trial. Patients will be randomly allocated to anterior inguinal hernia repair according to the TREPP mesh repair or TIPP procedure. All patients with a primary unilateral inguinal hernia, eligible for operation, will be invited to participate in the trial. The primary outcome measure will be the number of patients with postoperative chronic pain. Secondary outcome measures will be serious adverse events (SAEs), including recurrence, hemorrhage, return to daily activities (for example work), operative time and hospital stay. Alongside the trial health status, an economic evaluation will be performed. To demonstrate that inguinal hernia repair according to the TREPP technique reduces the percentage of patients with postoperative chronic pain from 12% to <6%, a sample size of 800 patients is required (two-sided test, α = 0.05, 80% power).The ENTREPPMENT trial aims to evaluate the TREPP and TIPP procedures from patients' perspective. It is hypothesized that the TREPP technique may reduce the number of patients with any form of postoperative chronic pain by 50% compared to the TIPP procedure.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Current Controlled Trials: ISRCTN18591339.

Surgical management of inguinal hernias at Bugando Medical Centre in northwestern Tanzania: our experiences in a resource-limited setting

BACKGROUND

Inguinal hernia repair remains the commonest operation performed by general surgeons all over the world. There is paucity of published data on surgical management of inguinal hernias in our environment. This study is intended to describe our own experiences in the surgical management of inguinal hernias and compare our results with that reported in literature.

METHODS

A descriptive prospective study was conducted at Bugando Medical Centre in northwestern Tanzania. Ethical approval to conduct the study was obtained from relevant authorities before the commencement of the study. Statistical data analysis was done using SPSS software version 17.0.

RESULTS

A total of 452 patients with inguinal hernias were enrolled in the study. The median age of patients was 36 years (range 3 months to 78 years). Males outnumbered females by a ratio of 36.7:1. This gender deference was statistically significant (P=0.003). Most patients (44.7%) presented late (more than five years of onset of hernia). Inguinoscrotal hernia (66.8%) was the commonest presentation. At presentation, 208 (46.0%) patients had reducible hernia, 110 (24.3%) had irreducible hernia, 84 (18.6%) and 50(11.1%) patients had obstructed and strangulated hernias respectively. The majority of patients (53.1%) had right sided inguinal hernia with a right-to-left ratio of 2.1: 1. Ninety-two (20.4%) patients had bilateral inguinal hernias. 296 (65.5%) patients had indirect hernia, 102 (22.6%) had direct hernia and 54 (11.9%) had both indirect and direct types (pantaloon hernia). All patients in this study underwent open herniorrhaphy. The majority of patients (61.5%) underwent elective herniorrhaphy under spinal anaesthesia (69.2%). Local anaesthesia was used in only 1.1% of cases. Bowel resection was required in 15.9% of patients. Modified Bassini's repair (79.9%) was the most common technique of posterior wall repair of the inguinal canal. Lichtenstein mesh repair was used in only one (0.2%) patient. Complication rate was 12.4% and it was significantly higher in emergency herniorrhaphy than in elective herniorrhaphy (P=0.002). The median length of hospital stay was 8 days and it was significantly longer in patients with advanced age, delayed admission, concomitant medical illness, high ASA class, the need for bowel resection and in those with surgical repair performed under general anesthesia (P<0.001). Mortality rate was 9.7%. Longer duration of symptoms, late hospitalization, coexisting disease, high ASA class, delayed operation, the need for bowel resection and presence of complications were found to be predictors of mortality (P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Inguinal hernias continue to be a source of morbidity and mortality in our centre. Early presentation and elective repair of inguinal hernias is pivotal in order to eliminate the morbidity and mortality associated with this very common problem.

A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of fixation versus nonfixation of mesh in laparoscopic total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair

BACKGROUND

Mesh fixation during laparoscopic total extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair is still controversial. Although many surgeons considered it necessary to fix the mesh, some published studies supported elimination of mesh fixation. Therefore, a meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted to compare the effectiveness and safety of fixation versus nonfixation of mesh in TEP.

METHODS

RCTs were identified from PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, SCI, and the Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM). Two reviewers assessed the quality of the studies and extracted data independently. The methodological quality was evaluated according to the Cochrane Handbook 5.0.2. Statistical analysis was conducted using the Cochrane software RevMan 5.0.21.

RESULTS

Six RCTs involving 772 patients were included. The nonfixation group had advantages in length of hospital stay [MD =-0.37, 95% CI (-0.57, -0.17), p = 0.0003], operative time [MD = -4.19, 95% CI (-7.77, -0.61), p = 0.02], and costs. However, there was no statistically significant difference in hernia recurrence [OR = 2.01, 95% CI (0.37, 11.03), p = 0.42], time to return to normal activities [MD = -0.13, 95% CI (-0.45, 0.19), p = 0.43], seroma [OR = 1.25, 95% CI (0.30, 5.18), p = 0.75], and postoperative pain on postoperative day 1 [MD = -0.21, 95% CI (-0.52, 0.10), p = 0.18] and day 7 [MD = -0.11, 95% CI (-0.42, 0.20), p = 0.47].

CONCLUSIONS

Without increasing the risk of early hernia recurrence, the nonfixation of mesh in TEP appears to be a safe alternative that is associated with less costs, shorter operative time, and hospital stay for the selected patients. Further adequately powered RCTs are required to clarify whether mesh fixation is necessary for the patients with different types of hernias and larger hernia defects.

[Repairs of inguinofemoral and ventral hernias--review]

In this article the author reviews the results, technology and latest achievements in the history of laparoscopic hernia repair. In conclusion, having considered the advantages and disadvantages, laparoscopic hernia repair offers the best results in terms of early rehabilitation, early and long-term postoperative pain and a very low recurrence rate (less than 1% and 5%). In the hands of experienced laparoscopic surgeons, it remains the gold standard for hernia repairs indisputably.

Impact of clinical pathways in surgery

BACKGROUND

One strategy to reduce the consumption of resources associated to specific procedures is to utilize clinical pathways, in which surgical care is standardized and preset by determination of perioperative in-hospital processes. The aim of this prospective study was to establish the impact of clinical pathways on costs, complication rates, and nursing activities.

METHOD

Data was prospectively collected for 171 consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy (n = 50), open herniorrhaphy (n = 56), and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (n = 65).

RESULTS

Clinical pathways reduced the postoperative hospital stay by 28% from a mean of 6.1 to 4.4 days (p < 0.001), while the 30-day readmission rate remained unchanged (0.5% vs. 0.45%). Total mean costs per case were reduced by 25% from euro 6,390 to euro 4,800 (p < 0.001). Costs for diagnostic tests were reduced by 33% (p < 0.001). Nursing hours decreased, reducing nursing costs by 24% from euro 1,810 to euro 1,374 (p < 0.001). A trend was noted for lower postoperative complication rates in the clinical pathway group (7% vs. 14%, p = 0.07).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates clinically and economically relevant benefits for the utilization of clinical pathways with a reduction in use of all resource types, without any negative impact on the rate of complications or re-hospitalization.

[Social aspect of inguinal herniotomy]

This article reviews current concepts of inguinal hernia repair--one of the most common operations in a surgery practice. The social-economic problems of repair of inguinal hernia are also discussed. There is much variation in the time when a patient returns to work after inguinal hernia repair. Factors such as patient expectations are strongly associated with return to work after inguinal hernia repair. Depression significantly delayed return to work. The management of plastic surgery on posterior wall of inguinal canal is recommended as promoting earlier return to work. The problems of Georgia on the way to insurance medicine are also discussed.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of local, regional and general anaesthesia for inguinal hernia repair using data from a randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Inguinal hernia repair is a common operation in general surgery and can be performed under local, regional or general anaesthesia. This multicentre randomized trial was undertaken to compare the costs of the three anaesthetic methods in general surgical practice.

METHODS

Between January 1999 and December 2001, 616 patients at ten hospitals who underwent primary inguinal hernia repair were randomized to local, regional or general anaesthesia. The primary endpoints were direct costs. Secondary endpoints were indirect costs and recurrence rates.

RESULTS

Total intraoperative, as well as total early postoperative, data showed local anaesthesia to have significant cost advantages over regional and general anaesthesia (P < 0.001). The advantage was also significant for total hospital and total healthcare costs (P < 0.001), whereas there was no significant difference between regional and general anaesthesia.

CONCLUSION

The use of local anaesthesia for inguinal hernia repair was significantly less expensive than regional or general anaesthesia.

Open or endoscopic total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair? A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Although a large number of surgeons currently perform endoscopic hernia surgery using a total extraperitoneal (TEP) approach, reviews published to date are based mainly on trials that compare laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) repair with various types of open inguinal hernia repair.

METHODS

A qualitative analysis of randomized trials comparing TEP with open mesh or sutured repair.

RESULTS

In this review, 4,231 patients were included in 23 trials. In 10 of 15 trials, TEP repair was associated with longer surgery time than open repair. A shorter postoperative hospital stay after TEP repair than after open repair was reported in 6 of 11 trials. In 8 of 9 trials, the time until return to work was significantly shorter after TEP repair. Hospital costs were significantly higher for TEP than for open repair in all four trials that included an economic evaluation. Most trials (n = 14) reported no differences in subsequent recurrence rates between TEP and open repair.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings showed that endoscopic TEP repair is associated with longer surgery time, shorter postoperative hospital stay, earlier return to work, and recurrence rates similar to those for open inguinal hernia repair. The procedure involves greater expenses for hospitals, but appears to be cost effective from a societal perspective. The TEP technique is a serious option for mesh repair of primary hernias.

Tension-Free Repair Versus Watchful Waiting for Men with Asymptomatic or Minimally Symptomatic Inguinal Hernias: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

BACKGROUND

Watchful waiting (WW) has been shown to be an acceptable option in men with asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic inguinal hernias when clinical and patient-reported outcomes are considered. Although WW is likely to be less costly initially when compared with tension-free repair (TFR) because of the cost of the operation, it is not clear whether WW remains the least costly option when longer-term costs are considered.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis of a randomized controlled trial at six community and academic centers. We examined costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALY), and cost-effectiveness at 2 years of followup. Costs were assessed by applying Medicare reimbursement rates to patients' health-care use, which was obtained by contacting patients' health-care providers. Quality of life was assessed using the Short Form-36 version 2 health-related quality-of-life survey. Of the 724 men randomized, 641 were available for the economic analysis: 317 were randomized to TFR and 324 were randomized to watchful waiting.

RESULTS

At 2 years, TFR patients had $1,831 higher mean costs than WW patients (95% CI, $409-$3,044), with 0.031 higher QALY (95% CI, 0.001-0.058). The cost per additional QALY for TFR patients was $59,065 (95% CI, $1,358-$322,765). The probability that TFR was cost-effective at the $50,000 per QALY level was 40%.

CONCLUSION

At 2 years, WW was a cost-effective treatment option for men with minimal or no hernia symptoms.

Das Aus für die minimal-invasive Leistenhernienversorgung durch § 115 b SGB V

BACKGROUND

Current German legislation ( (section sign) 115 b SGB V) allows groin hernia inpatient treatment only under particular circumstances. That allows the operative technique of first choice for outpatient groin hernia repair to be determined by basic market principles. The aim of this paper was to study the feasibility of outpatient minimally invasive hernia surgery with regard to complication rates, patient satisfaction, and economic considerations.

METHODS

For 1 year, a total of 571 patients with inguinal hernias (131 male, eight female, mean age 46 years, all ASA I) were treated at two surgical centers. Twenty-four percent (139/571) underwent outpatient total extraperitoneal repair (TEP). Complication rates were recorded. Patient satisfaction with the procedure was evaluated by a standard questionnaire. Cost calculations were compared with revenues according to the EBM2000plus.

RESULTS

Of the patients, 96.4% were discharged on the day of operation without subsequent rehospitalization, 84% had no fears of complications at home, 54% went back to work in less than 14 days, and 88.7% were willing to undergo TEP a second time if necessary. Calculated average total cost of euro 709 exceeded the revenue of euro 565 by 20%.

CONCLUSION

For a carefully selected group, outpatient TEP is patient-friendly and safe. Despite these advantages, it still remains economically unattractive to hospital management because of the 20% cover shortage. Improvements in the current legislation are urgently desired.

Routine surgical pathology in general surgery

BACKGROUND

Although pathological analysis provides the definitive diagnosis for most resection specimens, recent evidence suggests that such analysis may be omitted for certain routine samples. This was a retrospective analysis of the value of routine histopathological examination performed in daily general surgical practice.

METHODS

All specimens from routine appendicectomies, cholecystectomies, haemorrhoidectomies and inguinal hernia repairs performed between 1993 and 2002 were included. The analysis included a comparison of histological and macroscopic diagnoses, review of preoperative and peroperative findings, and an evaluation of the consequences of routine histopathological assessment on patient management and costs.

RESULTS

With the exception of hernia specimens, the rate of submission for routine pathological evaluation was 100 per cent. No hernia sac specimen from more than 2000 interventions revealed aberrant histological findings. Of 311 haemorrhoidectomy specimens three showed malignancy, all of which had a suspicious macroscopic appearance. Of 1465 appendices, only one (0.1 per cent) had a potentially relevant histological diagnosis that was not suspected macroscopically. Among 1523 cholecystectomy specimens, all adenomas (0.6 per cent) and carcinomas (0.4 per cent) were suspected macroscopically or developed in association with a known disease.

CONCLUSION

The rarity of incidental histological findings relevant to patient management, especially in the absence of macroscopic abnormalities, suggests that routine histological examination of certain specimens may be omitted. A more elementary role for macroscopic examination of the specimen by the surgeon and the pathologist is proposed.

Use of prophylactic antibiotics in a paediatric day-case surgery at NAUTH, Nnewi, Nigeria: a randomized double-blinded study

This was a randomized double-blinded study to assess the need for prophylactic antibiotics in paediatric day-case surgery, as well as the cost implication. Group A received preoperative intravenous ampiclox and vitamin B complex in doses appropriate for weight and age, while group B received only vitamin B complex as a placebo. The study was completed by 138 (95.2%) patients in group A, and by 140 (97.2%) patients in group B. Wound infection was seen in seven (5%) patients in group A and six (4.3%) patients in group B. The average cost of hernia repair in group A was US 43 dollars and US 31.1 dollars in group B.

[Effects and measures of the flat payment system based on the diagnosis procedure combination system in pediatric surgery]

The current status of the flat payment system based on the diagnosis procedure combination (DPC) system was examined in pediatric surgery. Many important diseases especially in neonatal surgery are not listed for the DPC system due to either the small number of cases or variations in hospital stay or cost In our university hospital, however, the DPC system was applied to 286 (90.8%) of 315 admissions. Total scores for the admissions were slightly higher (103.5%) in the DPC system compared with the fee-for-service system. Scores for inguinal hernia by day surgery and one-night stay were also slightly higher (102.2%) in the DPC system. Future measures for the DPC system include the provision that most preoperative evaluations should be performed in outpatient clinics and further elective surgery at a separate admission is recommended for patients with benign disease or in good condition. In cases of surgery for emergencies or malignancies, too many examinations should be avoided. Postoperative treatment using a clinical path without complications should be performed to achieve shortening of hospital stays and reduced cost. Problems in the current DPC system are complicated and inadequate classification, probably due to the unique and cost-unbeneficial nature of pediatric surgery. To establish a better medical fee system, further efforts to improve the DPC system should be continued.

Étude comparative rétrospective de l'impact médicoéconomique d'un renfort innovant dans la cure des éventrations de la paroi abdominale antérieure

STUDY AIM

Determine the gain of hospitalization cost using a new intraperitoneal mesh compared to the retro-muscular pre-fascial implantation of a polyester mesh.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From January 1998 to June 2000, 52 patients with incisional hernia of the anterior abdominal wall were operated using intraperitoneal Parietex composite Mesh. The cost of surgery, anesthesia and hospitalization in this group were compared to similar data from a group of 21 patient where a Mesrsuture mesh in a prefascial retromuscular position was used.

RESULTS

Parietex Composite Mesh in intraperitoneal position allows a significative reduction in surgery time, anesthesia time and hospitalization. The clinical results were confirmed by cost savings.

CONCLUSION

Using new innovative medical device changing surgery technique insures significant cost saving despite its initial additional cost and increases patient's comfort during hospitalization.

Prospective randomized study of internal oblique aponeurotic flap repair for tension-free reinforcement of the posterior inguinal wall: a new technique

In recent years, Lichtenstein's tension-free hernioplasty has emerged as the gold standard for hernia surgery. However, it entails placement of a mesh and thus is costlier material-wise compared with herniorrhaphies. A new technique of internal oblique aponeurosis flap (IOAF) has been devised by the author that incorporates the advantages of Lichtenstein's technique (low recurrence, less pain) without its additional costs. A prospective study was carried out to compare the two techniques. The mean time for surgery was significantly less for the IOAF repair compared with the Lichtenstein's repair. Complications were fewer with the IOAF repair, especially local heaviness and induration. IOAF repair also had less material cost than Lichtenstein's repair. The technique of IOAF repair for inguinal hernia is fast, safe, and has less material cost compared with the Lichtenstein tension-free repair.

Costs and quality of life after endoscopic repair of inguinal hernia vs open tension-free repair: a review

BACKGROUND

The ongoing debate about the relative merits of endoscopic (EH) vs open mesh herniorrhaphy (OH) prompts the need for comparisons of outcome measures other than recurrence. Therefore, we reviewed data on the costs, time to return to work, quality of life (QoL), and pain associated with EH and OH.

METHODS

Studies comparing EH to OH and explicitly involving costs or QoL were identified and reviewed.

RESULTS

Eighteen studies were included. Direct in-hospital costs were higher for unilateral EH. Direct out-of-hospital costs were lower after EH in some studies. Indirect costs were lower for EH. Total costs were higher for EH in three studies and lower in one study. With EH, QoL was better, pain was less, operating time was longer, and time return to work and other activities was shorter.

CONCLUSION

From a societal perspective, EH entails costs similar to OH but offers extra benefits to the patient in terms of QoL and pain.

Inguinal hernia repair: results using an open preperitoneal approach

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic surgical approaches to the repair of inguinal hernias have shown the advantages of placing mesh in the preperitoneal space. Despite those advantages, laparoscopic hernia repairs have been associated with increased cost, longer operating times, and advanced laparoscopic skills. An open preperitoneal approach has the benefit of mesh in the preperitoneal position without the disadvantages of a laparoscopic procedure.

METHODS

We present our experience with the use of an open preperitoneal mesh repair (KugelMesh, Bard, Inc.). The study was conducted in a prospective fashion from January 1998 through October 2001. 1072 hernias were repaired in two community hospitals by three general surgeons. Patients with recurrent hernias were excluded if the initial repair was from a preperitoneal approach. Operative time, cost, post-operative pain, and complications were analyzed.

RESULTS

Recurrences occurred in five patients (0.47%) during a mean follow-up time of 23 months (range: 2-47). The average operating time was 32.4 min (range: 16-62). Post-operative narcotic pain medication usage averaged 5.8 pills (range: 0-26) per repair. Average surgical charges were less for the open preperitoneal approach ($2253) than for laparoscopic repairs ($4826).

CONCLUSIONS

The open preperitoneal hernia repair using the Kugel mesh offers many advantages. It is inexpensive, has a low recurrence rate, and allows the surgeon to cover all potential defects with one piece of mesh. Postoperative recovery is short and postoperative pain is minimal.

Reparación de la hernia inguinal primaria: Lichtenstein frente a Shouldice. Estudio prospectivo y aleatorizado sobre el dolor y los costes hospitalarios

INTRODUCTION

Hernia is one of the most widely studied processes, and the search for excellence has become the final aim. However, many controversies remain to be resolved. The objective of the present study was to analyze postoperative pain and costs using two techniques of primary inguinal hernia repair.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

We performed a prospective, randomized study of 54 patients who underwent surgical repair of inguinal hernia through either the Lichtenstein or the Shouldice technique between June 2001 and May 2002. The following variables were analyzed: age, location and type of hernia, evaluation of tolerance to local anesthesia, surgical technique, operating time, pain at days 1, 3 and 5 after surgery, analgesic consumption, days until driving could be resumed, days off work, and occupation.

RESULTS

The patient groups were similar, with no significant differences in age, location or type of hernia. For Lichtenstein hernioplasty, operating time was lower (p < 0.01); pain evaluation showed no significant differences on days 1 and 3 after surgery but was higher on day 5 (p = 0.064). No significant differences were found in analgesic consumption, time before driving could be resumed, or days off work. Freelance patients returned to work earlier, independently of the surgical technique performed. The cost of the Lichtenstein technique was 235 euros compared with 180 euros for the Shouldice technique and this difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

In the hands of expert surgeons, the Shouldice technique is the procedure of choice in the repair of primary hernias. The results are just as satisfactory as those obtained with Lichtenstein hernioplasty and hospital costs are lower.

[Attempted assessment of the incidence and cost of surgical treatment of inginal hernias in Poland in the years 2001-2002]

A comprehensive, up-to-date assessment of the incidence and treatment cost of inguinal hernias in Poland is made difficult by the lack of a central data registry and insufficient accuracy of the data available. Therefore, research was undertaken in order to evaluate the incidence and cost of inguinal hernia treatment in the years 2001-2002 in Poland. Survey-derived data was collected from Regional Health Funds operating similar data management systems in 2002 and the Regional Branches of the National Health Fund in 2003. The number of inguinal hernia repairs, length of hospital stay, as well as the cost of these procedures and the overall number of insured people in the region were assessed. Data was obtained from 11 units (Regional Health Funds, Branches of the National Health Fund). The length of hospital stay differed between individual Regional Health Funds. The annual cost of inguinal hernia treatment amounts to approximately 100 million PLN.

Randomized Clinical Trial of Fixation vs Nonfixation of Mesh in Total Extraperitoneal Inguinal Hernioplasty

HYPOTHESIS

Mesh fixation in the extraperitoneal space during endoscopic total extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty might be related to an increase in postoperative pain, morbidity rate, and hospital costs.

DESIGN

Randomized clinical trial.

SETTING

University teaching hospital.

PATIENTS

From January 1999 to December 2001, 170 patients with inguinal hernia were invited to participate; 85 patients were randomized to each group.

INTERVENTION

Total extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty with or without mesh fixation using staples.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Operating time, morbidity rate, chronic pain, recurrences, and hospital cost were analyzed. Follow-up was considered complete when it included a physical examination at 24 months (mean, 36 +/- 12 months).

RESULTS

The statistical study showed no significant differences with regard to epidemiological factors, hernia type, operating time, morbidity, or recurrences when the mesh was stapled, although the total cost of the process was higher (P<.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Stapling the mesh in total extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty offers no advantages and increases the cost of the process. Our results suggest the possibility of limiting the use of mesh fixation in total extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty to cases of direct bilateral hernias.

[Tension-free laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair]

AIM

During the last decade laparoscopic techniques have been applied to the treatment of inguinal hernia to combine tension-free technique, esthetic, and functional benefits of mini-invasive surgery. Anyway controversy persists regarding the most effective inguinal hernia repair. The aim of this study is to compare the open technique and the laparoscopic approach concerning: complications, recurrences, recovery time and return to usual activity.

METHODS

A randomized prospective analysis of 121 consecutive inguinal hernia repairs was performed over a 12-month period. Male well-informed patients with primary monolateral inguinal hernia (ASA I-II) were divided into 2 groups and consecutively treated; group A was treated with laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal approach (TAPP) (median age 47+/-7 years, 57 patients), group B with open mesh herniorrhaphy (45+/-6 years, 64 patients).

RESULTS

Complication rate was 5.26% for group A (none needed conversion) and 4.68% for group B. All complications were considered minor. No recurrences were observed over a 12-month follow-up in both groups. Post-operative hospital stay and return to activity show statistically significant differences. Median post-hospital stay was 1.7 days for group A while it was longer (2.9 days) for group B. Significant difference was observed in the duration of convalescence too (group A 9.3+/-7.2 days; group B 12.1+/-7. 1 days).

CONCLUSION

On the basis of our experience, even if a longer follow-up is needed, the validity of laparoscopic approach to inguinal hernia is confirmed. General anesthesia and higher costs are reasonable compromises for a shorter period of discomfort in patients with a low ASA index and busy job/sport activity.

Outcome and Cost Comparison of Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal Hernia Repair versus Open Lichtenstein Technique

Laparoscopic hernia repair has all the advantages of a tension free repair. This study compares the laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) approach with tension-free open hernia repair in terms of operative time, postoperative pain, hospital stay, complications, and cost. Open and TAPP repairs using polypropylene mesh were performed in two groups of 25 male patients. The difference in operative times between the groups was not significant. Mean pain scores (0-100) for the open group were 54.12 +/- 13.06 at 12 hours and 37.24 +/- 11.38 at 24 hours, significantly higher than the corresponding scores of 38.36 +/- 8.21 at 12 hours and 20.92 +/- 8.73 at 24 hours for the TAPP group (P < 0.05). The mean postoperative analgesic dose was 6.72 +/- 2.72 in the TAPP group, which was insignificantly lower than 7.52 +/- 2.00 in the open group. Mean hospital stay was 2.24 +/- 0.97 days in the open group and 1.52 +/- 0.51 in the TAPP group, which was significant (P < 0.05). Twenty patients (80%) in the TAPP group rated themselves highly satisfied with the surgery as compared to 11 patients (44%) in the open group (P < 0.05). There was no recurrence in either group during a mean followup period of 13.5 months (range, 8-28 months). Laparoscopic hernia repair was significantly more expensive than open (1100 US dollars versus 629 US dollars). TAPP repair is superior to open repair in terms of shorter hospital stay, lower postoperative pain, and better patient satisfaction. It is also safe, with no recurrence in a short-term period. This technique will be the operation of choice for the treatment of groin hernia after long-term results have been established in our center.

Cost-effectiveness of alternative methods of surgical repair of inguinal hernia

Objectives:To assess the relative cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic methods of inguinal hernia repair compared with open flat mesh and open non-mesh repair.

Methods:Data on the effectiveness of these alternatives came from three systematic reviews comparing: (i) laparoscopic methods with open flat mesh or non-mesh methods; (ii) open flat mesh with open non-mesh repair; and (iii) methods that used synthetic mesh to repair the hernia defect with those that did not. Data on costs were obtained from the authors of economic evaluations previously conducted alongside trials included in the reviews. A Markov model was used to model cost-effectiveness for a five-year period after the initial operation. The outcomes of the model were presented using a balance sheet approach and as cost per hernia recurrence avoided and cost per extra day at usual activities.

Results:Open flat mesh was the most cost-effective method of preventing recurrences. Laparoscopic repair provided a shorter period of convalescence and less long-term pain compared with open flat mesh but was more costly. The mean incremental cost per additional day back at usual activities compared with open flat mesh was €38 and €80 for totally extraperitoneal and transabdominal preperitoneal repair, respectively.

Conclusions:Laparoscopic repair is not cost-effective compared with open flat mesh repair in terms of cost per recurrence avoided. Decisions about the use of laparoscopic repair depend on whether the benefits (reduced pain and earlier return to usual activities) outweigh the extra costs and intraoperative risks. On the evidence presented here, these extra costs are unlikely to be offset by the short-term benefits of laparoscopic repair.

Economic evaluation of laparoscopic and open inguinal herniorrhaphies: the effect of cost-containment measures and internal hospital policy decisions on costs and charges

BACKGROUND

Totally extraperitoneal (TEP) repairs of inguinal hernias, despite having a favorable clinical outcome are often criticized due to higher costs and charges associated with this approach. We, therefore, present a comparison of direct costs and charges between TEP and open tension-free (OPN) repairs, emphasizing the effect of cost-containment measures on the part of surgeons and the hospital's charging (rate-setting) policies on these measurements.

METHODS

Itemized direct costs, charges, and reimbursements were determined for 41 TEP and 44 OPN unilateral repairs done between January 1997 and December 1999. Multiple sensitivity analyses were done to evaluate the effect of cost-containment measures and the hospital's rate-setting policies on the differences in costs and charges between the two procedures. The hospital's profits were expressed as profit-cost ratios.

RESULTS

The mean direct cost for a TEP repair was $128.58 more than the OPN repair ($795.07[+/-65] vs 666.49 [+/-52]). However, mean charges and hospital reimbursement were $2,139.80 and $1,679.87, respectively, more for the TEP repairs. The profit-cost ratio was significantly higher in the TEP group (2.85:1 vs 1.07:1, P<.001). We found that 79.8% of the difference in direct costs vs 29% of the difference in charges between the two procedures was sensitive to cost-containment measures. Forty-five percent of the difference in charges was due to the hospital's nonuniform rate-setting policies. Long-term follow-up (38 months) showed no recurrence for either procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

The direct cost of TEP repairs with the minimal use of disposable instruments in a high-volume center is comparable to the OPN repair. However, due to differences in the hospital's charging policies, TEP repair would appear to be an expensive alternative from the payer's point of view.

How long do we need teaching in the operating room? The true costs of achieving surgical routine

BACKGROUND

Our aim was to quantify the incremental costs of longer operating times of residents and less-experienced junior consultants when compared with senior consultants on the basis of two surgical routine procedures.

METHODS

We prospectively assessed 246 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy and 216 patients who underwent open inguinal hernia repair. Operating times, complication rates and overall costs for these patients were recorded and linked to the attending surgeons.

RESULTS

Most importantly, operating times significantly depend on the surgeon (P<0.001) and on proper supervision of junior surgeons (P<0.001 to P=0.003). When compared with those of senior surgeons, incremental costs for the hospital provider were Euro 200 and Euro 54 per laparoscopic cholecystectomy and Euro 153 and Euro 106 per open hernia repair when carried out by junior consultants and residents, respectively. Overall incremental costs per year for these procedures were Euro 8,370 for residents and Euro 22,922 for junior consultants.

CONCLUSION

Owing to longer operating times for junior consultants the costs of achieving surgical routine are considerably higher than previously estimated. These higher costs derive from junior consultants performing operations without proper supervision from senior consultants. We conclude that prolonged supervision in the operating room is highly cost-effective regardless of higher costs for personal resources per operating-minute.

Spannungsfreie Methoden der Operation prim�rer Leistenbr�che

INTRODUCTION

Surgery of inguinal hernia has fundamentally changed since the concept of "tension-free" laparoscopic and open repair was introduced in the previous decade. Until now, final judgement of the new methods was difficult because of lack of appropriate studies.

METHODS

In a prospective clinical study, we compared the results of endoscopic, total extraperitoneal (TEP) (72 hernias) with Lichtenstein hernioplasty (66 hernias). Follow-up was done daily in the hospital and 6 weeks and 12 months after operation.

RESULTS

Operation time was equal in the case of unilateral hernias, but higher surgical qualification was required in the TEP group. Intraoperative and early postoperative complication rates were without significant difference, but late ( P=0.013) and total ( P=0.031) complication rates were significantly higher in the TEP group. There were no clear advantages for TEP in patient comfort, social criteria, or cosmetic appearance. The costs for TEP were 2,428 Euros, 440 Euros more than for the Lichtenstein operation.

CONCLUSION

As a result of the study, the Lichtenstein operation can be recommended as regular operative therapy of primary inguinal hernia because, compared with TEP, it is a simple, safe, effective and economical procedure.

Inguinal hernia repair: anaesthesia, pain and convalescence

Elective surgical repair of an inguinal or femoral hernia is one of the most common surgical procedures. The treatment, however, presents several challenges regarding anaesthesia for the procedure, the postoperative analgesic therapy and convalescence, as well as planning of the procedure. Local, general, and regional anaesthesia are all used for hernia repair, but to different degrees, primarily depending on traditions and whether the institution has specific interest in hernia surgery. Thus, the use of local anaesthesia varies from a few percent in Sweden, 18% in Denmark and up to almost 100% in specialised institutions, dedicated to hernia surgery. The feasibility of local anaesthesia is high, as judged by the rate of conversion to general anaesthesia (< 1%), although intraoperative pain is quite common. The generally low rate of serious complications does not allow firm conclusions, but the rate of less serious complications is lower by local anaesthesia, compared to other anaesthetic techniques. Of special interest is, that the rate of urinary retention can be eliminated by the use of local anaesthesia. Local anaesthesia results, in comparative studies, in a higher degree of patient satisfaction than other anaesthetic techniques. Local anaesthesia also facilitates faster mobilisation and earlier discharge/fulfilment of discharge criteria from post anaesthetic care units than other anaesthetic techniques. Pain after hernia repair is more pronounced at mobilisation or coughing than during rest, and younger patients seem to have more pain than older patients. The pain ceases over time, and it is most pronounced the day after surgery, where two thirds have moderate or severe pain during activity, while one third still have moderate or severe pain after one week, and approximately 10% after 4 weeks. Pain after laparoscopic surgery is less pronounced than after open surgery, while different open repair techniques do not exhibit significant differences. Postoperative pain is best treated with a combination of local analgesia and peripherally acting agents (paracetamol, NSAID or their combination), while opioids should be avoided due to side effects, primarily nausea and sedation. Moderate or severe pain one year postoperatively is seen in 5-12% of patients. There seem to be no difference between different surgical or anaesthetic techniques, but the following factors have been related to a higher rate of chronic pain: previous or subsequent hernia surgery on the same side, young age, pain before surgery, high pain scores in the immediate postoperative period, and postoperative complications and prolonged convalescence. Patients should be informed about the risk of chronic pain, particularly if the hernia is asymptomatic. The duration of convalescence after hernia repair varies considerably, primarily due to variation in recommendations. No documentation is available to support that a prolonged convalescence reduces the risk of recurrence of the hernia, and most specialised institutions recommend immediate return to all usual activities. Pain seems to be the most important cause of prolonged convalescence. From all published consecutive materials with recommendations of short convalescence the mean or median duration is 6-8 days, in contrast to the two to four weeks often seen in randomised comparisons of different surgical techniques. Patients should be informed, that they can immediately resume all activity if pain permits, but also to expect that pain may limit function of activities of daily living during the first postoperative week. Hernia surgery, including treatment of recurrent hernias, can and ought to be performed as day case surgery, irrespective of the chosen anaesthetic technique, as there are no medical or surgical contraindications to this. Social causes may indicate, that overnight stay may be advisable or desirable, preferably in a patient hotel facility. Despite this, the fraction of patients operated in a day-case surgical set-up varies from 6% in France to 83% in US, and in Denmark 60% of patients have their hernia repair as a day-case procedure. A day-case hernia surgery service should be organised with standardised patient records, including descriptions of surgery performed as well as letters of discharge for the general practitioner. If clinical data are stored electronically, the basis is created for valuable clinical databases like the one behind the present thesis, and they can be used both for scientific purposes and for quality control and improvement.