Bulbar Redness and Dry Eye Disease: Comparison of a Validated Subjective Grading Scale and an Objective Automated Method

SIGNIFICANCE

In this study, assessments of conjunctival redness were performed to evaluate whether patients with or without dry eye disease (DED) could be discriminated based on this measure. Our findings suggest that subjectively grading redness by quadrant, as opposed to automated en face measurements, may be more suitable for this purpose.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to quantify bulbar redness using the validated bulbar redness (VBR) grading scale and an automated objective method (Oculus Keratograph 5M; K5M) in participants with DED and non-DED controls.

METHODS

Participants with DED (Ocular Surface Disease Index score ≥20 and Oxford scale corneal staining ≥2) and controls (Ocular Surface Disease Index score ≤10 and corneal staining ≤1) attended two study visits. In part 1A of visit 1, baseline bulbar redness was graded with the VBR scale in each conjunctival quadrant of both eyes, followed by automated measurements of temporal and nasal redness with the K5M. This was immediately followed by part 1B, during which a topical vasoconstrictor was instilled into both eyes. Redness assessments were repeated 5 and 30 minutes after instillation with both instruments. Participants returned 14 days later for visit 2, where the same assessments as for visit 1A were repeated.

RESULTS

Seventy-four participants (50 DED and 24 controls) completed the study. There were statistically significant differences in redness between the DED and control groups when assessed with the VBR scale (14/16 comparisons; all, P < .05), whereas no significant differences in K5M-derived redness between the DED and non-DED groups were found at any location or time point. Both subjective and objective instruments detected statistically significant reductions in redness 5 and 30 minutes after instillation of the vasoconstrictor (all, P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

Although both subjective and objective instruments were sensitive to detecting changes in redness induced by vasoconstriction, statistically significant differences in redness between DED and control groups were only found using the VBR scale.

Comparison of an objective method of measuring bulbar redness to the use of traditional grading scales

PURPOSE

The primary objective was to compare measures of bulbar redness objectively using a photometric method with standard grading methods. Measures of redness were made on 24 participants wearing a silicone hydrogel contact lens in one eye for overnight wear. This report compares hyperaemia after 1 week of daily wear (baseline) with redness measured after 6 months of overnight wear.

METHOD

A new method of objectively measuring bulbar conjunctival redness was performed using the Spectrascan650 Photometer by Photo Research under fixed illumination. Photometric measures in CIEu(*) chromaticity values involve the measurement of chromaticity, a physical analogue of redness, greenness and blueness in the image. This method was validated in Part 1 of the study using repeated measurements on the photographic CCLRU scale. In Part 2 of the study, the photographic grading scale (CCLRU) from 0 (none) to 100 (extreme) was used to make the comparison.

RESULTS

Part 1 indicated that the photometer provides a repeatable and reliable measure of bulbar redness (CCC=0.989). A moderately strong and significant correlation was found between the CIEu(*) chromaticity values and the analogue data (R=0.795, p=0.000) at each measurement session (from baseline to 1 day, 1 week, and 1, 3 and 6 months of overnight wear).

CONCLUSIONS

This new standardized and objective method of measuring bulbar redness has great potential to replace subjective grading scales, especially with multi-centre studies, where variability between investigators occurs. This method may also detect smaller changes between visits or between eyes.

The Hampton-Gledhill 2-stage pressure risk-assessment system

Pressure ulcers are largely preventable and, therefore, patients dying of large, necrotic pressure damage is an unacceptable situation. Lee Gledhill is both a nurse and a barrister and has been involved in many cases involving nurses facing court proceedings when their patients' primary cause of death is pressure ulcers. Sylvie Hampton, has acted as expert witness in some of these cases. It became obvious to the two authors that had healthcare assistants (HCAs) been more aware of how pressure damage could be detected and then prevented, some of the supervising nurses would not have been facing legal charges. The authors decided to produce a simple method of assessing first-stage skin changes for HCAs to not only recognize these changes, but also to have a framework in place describing the actions they need to take. This framework was produced as a card (the Hampton-Gledhill 2-stage pressure risk-assessment system). The card is being validated in many nursing homes and hospitals around the UK and in Jersey.

Characterizing reactive hyperemia via tissue reflectance spectroscopy in response to an ischemic load across gender, age, skin pigmentation and diabetes

PURPOSE

Pressure ulcers represent a major secondary complication for amputees with diabetes and further complications may arise since ulcers are particularly hard to heal in this population. This study characterized the hyperemic response to a localized ischemic load in people with diabetes and amputation and compared it to that of subjects without diabetes or amputation.

SUBJECTS

Case-control study matching subjects by gender, age, skin pigmentation, and smoking status.

METHODS

Applying 150 mmHg to the patellar tendon for 10 minutes induced reactive hyperemia (RH). Tissue reflectance spectroscopy measured hemoglobin (HbO(2)) concentration in tissue before, during and after application of pressure. Refill time, Maximum HbO(2), Time@Max HbO(2), RH area and RH half-life characterized the RH response and were analyzed using ANOVA. All values up to a level of p <0.1 are presented.

RESULTS

Analysis included responses from 88 subjects. RH magnitude and temporal parameters varied across skin pigmentation; smokers showed a decreased RH magnitude; vasodilator users had greater RH temporal parameters; no evidence of differences were found across disease state or age.

CONCLUSION

Decreased RH response in smokers and subjects with dark skin might indicate a reduced ability to recover from ischemia. The lack of difference in RH response between subjects with and without diabetes was consistent with studies using other disability groups and corroborates the theory that RH is locally mediated.

Automated measurement of bulbar redness

PURPOSE

To examine the relationship between physical image characteristics and the clinical grading of images of conjunctival redness and to develop an accurate and efficient predictor of clinical redness from the measurements of these images.

METHODS

Seventy-two clinicians graded the appearance of 30 images of redness on a 100-point sliding scale with three referent images (at 25, 50, and 75 points) through a World Wide Web-based survey. Using software developed in a commercial computer program, each image was quantified in two ways: by the presence of blood vessel edges, based on the Canny edge-detection algorithm, and by a measure of overall redness, quantified by the relative magnitude of the redness component of each red-green-blue (RGB) pixel. Linear and nonlinear regressors and a Bayesian estimator were used to optimally combine the image characteristics to predict the clinical grades.

RESULTS

The clinical judgments of the redness images were highly variable: The average grade range for each image was approximately 55 points, more than half the extent of the entire scale. The median clinical grade was chosen as the most reliable measure of "truth." The median grade was predicted by a weighted linear combination of the edgeness and redness features of each image. The strength of the predicted association was r = 0.976, exceeding the strength of association of all but one of the 72 individual clinicians.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical grading of redness images is highly variable. Despite this human variability, easily implemented image-analysis and statistical procedures were able to reliably predict median clinical grades of conjunctival redness.

The repeatability of discrete and continuous anterior segment grading scales

PURPOSE

To investigate the repeatability of three anterior segment clinical grading scales: 1) verbal descriptors scale (VDS), 2) photographic matching scale (PS), and 3) continuous matching scale (CS).

METHODS

Five optometrists graded 30 slides each of 3-9-o'clock staining, bulbar redness, and palpebral conjunctival roughness twice, separated by at least a day. VDS and PS were five-point scales (0-4) with half grades permitted. The CS was a 5-second, 240-frame video movie generated using morphing software. PS and CS grading was done with references presented on a computer screen.

RESULTS

Averaged across observers, the test-retest intraclass correlation, correlation coefficient of concordance, and Pearson's r ranged from 0.95 to 0.99 (all p < 0.001). Coefficients of repeatability using CS to grade all three ocular conditions ranged between 0.31 and 0.49. The corresponding PS and VDS coefficients of repeatability ranged between 0.37 and 0.49; PS generally had better repeatability than VDS.

CONCLUSIONS

Each of the clinical grading scales was reliable. The coefficients of repeatability showed that bulbar redness and palpebral conjunctival roughness were graded with higher precision using CS.

Endodontic classification

Clinical and histopathologic findings are mixed in current endodontic classifications. A new system, based on symptomatology, may be more useful in clincial practice. The classifications are vital asymptomatic, hypersensitive dentin, inflamed-reversible, inflamed/dengenerating without area-irreversible, inflamed/degenerating with area-irreversible, necrotic without area, and necrotic with area.