Risk of perforation after colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy: a population-based study

BACKGROUND

Although the risk of bowel perforation is often cited as a major factor in the choice between colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy for colorectal screening, good estimates of the absolute and relative risks of perforation are lacking.

METHODS

We used a large population-based cohort that consisted of a random sample of 5% of Medicare beneficiaries living in regions of the United States covered by the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program registries to determine rates of perforation in people aged 65 years and older. We identified individuals who were cancer-free and had undergone colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy between 1991 and 1998, calculated both the incidence and risk of perforation within 7 days of the procedure, and explored the impact on incidence and risk of perforation of age, race/ethnicity, sex, comorbidities, and indication for the procedure. We also estimated the risk of death after perforation. Risks were calculated with odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). All statistical tests were two-sided.

RESULTS

There were 77 perforations after 39 286 colonoscopies (incidence = 1.96/1000 procedures) and 31 perforations after 35 298 sigmoidoscopies (incidence = 0.88/1000 procedures). After adjustment, the OR for perforation from colonoscopy relative to perforation from sigmoidoscopy was 1.8 (95% CI = 1.2 to 2.8). Risk of perforation from either procedure increased in association with increasing age (P(trend)<.001 for both procedures) and the presence of two or more comorbidities (P(trend)<.001 for colonoscopy and P(trend) =.03 for sigmoidoscopy). Compared with those who were endoscopied and did not have a perforation, the risk of death was statistically significantly increased for those who had a perforation after either colonoscopy (OR = 9.0, 95% CI = 3.0 to 27.3) or sigmoidoscopy (OR = 8.8, 95% CI = 1.6 to 48.5). The risk of perforation after colonoscopy, especially for screening procedures, declined during the 8-year study period.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of perforation after colonoscopy is approximately double that after sigmoidoscopy, but this difference appears to be decreasing. These observations should be useful to clinicians making screening and diagnostic decisions for individual patients and to policy officials setting guidelines for colorectal cancer screening programs.

Treatment-related mortality with bevacizumab in cancer patients: a meta-analysis

CONTEXT

Fatal adverse events (FAEs) have been reported in cancer patients treated with the widely used angiogenesis inhibitor bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy. Currently, the role of bevacizumab in treatment-related mortality is not clear.

OBJECTIVE

To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to determine the overall risk of FAEs associated with bevacizumab.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases as well as abstracts presented at American Society of Clinical Oncology conferences from January 1966 to October 2010 were searched to identify relevant studies.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Eligible studies included prospective RCTs in which bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy or biological therapy was compared with chemotherapy or biological therapy alone. Summary incidence rates, relative risks (RRs), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using fixed- or random-effects models.

DATA SYNTHESIS

A total of 10,217 patients with a variety of advanced solid tumors from 16 RCTs were included in the analysis. The overall incidence of FAEs with bevacizumab was 2.5% (95% CI, 1.7%-3.9%). Compared with chemotherapy alone, the addition of bevacizumab was associated with an increased risk of FAEs, with an RR of 1.46 (95% CI, 1.09-1.94; P = .01; incidence, 2.5% vs 1.7%). This association varied significantly with chemotherapeutic agents (P = .045) but not with tumor types (P = .13) or bevacizumab doses (P = .16). Bevacizumab was associated with an increased risk of FAEs in patients receiving taxanes or platinum agents (RR, 3.49; 95% CI, 1.82-6.66; incidence, 3.3% vs 1.0%) but was not associated with increased risk of FAEs when used in conjunction with other agents (RR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.25-2.88; incidence, 0.8% vs 0.9%). The most common causes of FAEs were hemorrhage (23.5%), neutropenia (12.2%), and gastrointestinal tract perforation (7.1%).

CONCLUSION

In a meta-analysis of RCTs, bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy or biological therapy, compared with chemotherapy alone, was associated with increased treatment-related mortality.

Laparotomy versus peritoneal drainage for necrotizing enterocolitis and perforation

BACKGROUND

Perforated necrotizing enterocolitis is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in premature infants, and the optimal treatment is uncertain. We designed this multicenter randomized trial to compare outcomes of primary peritoneal drainage with laparotomy and bowel resection in preterm infants with perforated necrotizing enterocolitis.

METHODS

We randomly assigned 117 preterm infants (delivered before 34 weeks of gestation) with birth weights less than 1500 g and perforated necrotizing enterocolitis at 15 pediatric centers to undergo primary peritoneal drainage or laparotomy with bowel resection. Postoperative care was standardized. The primary outcome was survival at 90 days postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included dependence on parenteral nutrition 90 days postoperatively and length of hospital stay.

RESULTS

At 90 days postoperatively, 19 of 55 infants assigned to primary peritoneal drainage had died (34.5 percent), as compared with 22 of 62 infants assigned to laparotomy (35.5 percent, P=0.92). The percentages of infants who depended on total parenteral nutrition were 17 of 36 (47.2 percent) in the peritoneal-drainage group and 16 of 40 (40.0 percent) in the laparotomy group (P=0.53). The mean (+/-SD) length of hospitalization for the 76 infants who were alive 90 days after operation was similar in the primary peritoneal-drainage and laparotomy groups (126+/-58 days and 116+/-56 days, respectively; P=0.43). Subgroup analyses stratified according to the presence or absence of radiographic evidence of extensive necrotizing enterocolitis (pneumatosis intestinalis), gestational age of less than 25 weeks, and serum pH less than 7.30 at presentation showed no significant advantage of either treatment in any group.

CONCLUSIONS

The type of operation performed for perforated necrotizing enterocolitis does not influence survival or other clinically important early outcomes in preterm infants. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00252681.).

Relatively short diagnostic delays (<8 hours) produce morbidity and mortality in blunt small bowel injury: an analysis of time to operative intervention in 198 patients from a multicenter experience

OBJECTIVE

Blunt small bowel injury (SBI) is uncommon, and its timely diagnosis may be difficult. The impact of operative delays on morbidity and mortality has been unclear. The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship of diagnostic delays to morbidity and mortality in blunt SBI.

METHODS

Patients with blunt SBI with perforation were identified from the registries of eight trauma centers (1989-1997). Patients with duodenal injuries were excluded. Data were extracted by individual chart review. Patients were classified as multi-trauma (group 1) or near-isolated SBI (group 2 with Abbreviated Injury Scale score < 2 for other body areas). Time to operation and its impact on mortality and morbidity was determined for each patient.

RESULTS

A total of 198 patients met inclusion criteria: 66.2% were male, mean age was 35.2 years (range, 1-90 years) and mean Injury Severity Score was 16.7 (range, 9-47). 100 patients had multiple injuries (group 1). There were 21 deaths (10.6%) with 9 (4.5%) attributable to delay in operation for SBI. In patients with near-isolated SBI, the incidence of mortality increased with time to operative intervention (within 8 hours: 2%; 8-16 hours: 9.1%; 16-24 hours: 16.7%; greater than 24 hours: 30.8%, p = 0.009) as did the incidence of complications. Delays as short as 8 hours 5 minutes and 11 hours 15 minutes were associated with mortality attributable to SBI. The rates of delay in diagnosis were not significantly associated with age, gender, intoxication, transfer status, or presence of associated injuries.

CONCLUSION

Delays in the diagnosis of SBI are directly responsible for almost half the deaths in this series. Even relatively brief delays (as little as 8 hours) result in morbidity and mortality directly attributable to "missed" SBI. Further investigation into the prompt diagnosis of this injury is needed.

Postoperative outcomes of extremely low birth-weight infants with necrotizing enterocolitis or isolated intestinal perforation: a prospective cohort study by the NICHD Neonatal Research Network

OBJECTIVE

Purposes of this study were: 1) to compare mortality and postoperative morbidities (intra-abdominal abscess, wound dehiscence, and intestinal stricture) in extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants who underwent initial laparotomy or drainage for necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) or isolated intestinal perforation (IP); 2) to determine the ability to distinguish NEC from IP preoperatively and the importance of this distinction on outcome measures; and 3) to evaluate the association between extent of intestinal disease determined at operation and outcome measures.

BACKGROUND

ELBW infants who undergo operation for NEC or IP have a postoperative, in-hospital mortality rate of approximately 50%. Whether to perform laparotomy or drainage initially is controversial. Also unknown is the importance of distinguishing NEC from IP and the current ability to make this distinction based on objective data available prior to operation.

METHODS

A prospective, multicenter cohort study of 156 ELBW infants at 16 neonatal intensive care units (NICU) within the NICHD Neonatal Research Network.

RESULTS

Among the 156 enrolled infants, 80 underwent initial peritoneal drainage and 76 initial laparotomy. Mortality rate was 49% (76 of 156). Ninety-six patients had a preoperative diagnosis of NEC and 60 had presumed IP. There was a high level of agreement between the presumed preoperative diagnosis and intraoperative diagnosis in patients undergoing initial laparotomy (kappa = 0.85). The relative risk for death with a preoperative diagnosis of NEC (versus IP) was 1.4 (95% confidence interval, 0.99-2.1, P = 0.052). The overall incidence of postoperative intestinal stricture was 10.3%, wound dehiscence 4.4%, and intra-abdominal abscess 5.8%, and did not significantly differ between groups undergoing initial laparotomy versus initial drainage.

CONCLUSIONS

Survival to hospital discharge after operation for NEC or IP in ELBW neonates remains poor (51%). Patients with a preoperative diagnosis of NEC have a relative risk for death of 1.4 compared with those with a preoperative diagnosis of IP. A distinction can be made preoperatively between NEC and IP based on abdominal radiographic findings and the patient's age at operation. Future randomized trials that compare laparotomy versus drainage would likely benefit from stratification of treatment assignment based on preoperative diagnosis.

Complicated diverticulitis: is it time to rethink the rules?

INTRODUCTION

Much of our knowledge and treatment of complicated diverticulitis (CD) are based on outdated literature reporting mortality rates of 10%. Practice parameters recommend elective resection after 2 episodes of diverticulitis to reduce morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study is to update our understanding of the morbidity, mortality, characteristics, and outcomes of CD.

METHODS

Three hundred thirty-seven patients hospitalized for CD were retrospectively analyzed. Characteristics and outcomes were determined using chi-squared and Fisher exact tests.

RESULTS

Mean age of patients was 65 years. Seventy percent had one or more comorbidities. A total of 46.6% had a history of at least one prior diverticulitis episode, whereas 53.4% presented with CD as their first episode. Overall mortality rate was 6.5% (86.4% associated with perforation, 9.5% anastomotic leak, 4.5% patient managed nonoperatively). A total of 89.5% of the perforation patients who died had no history of diverticulitis. Steroid use was significantly associated with perforation rates as well as mortality (P< 0.001 and P = 0.002). Comorbidities such as diabetes, collagen-vascular disease, and immune system compromise were also highly associated with death (P = 0.006, P = 0.009, and P = 0.003, respectively). Overall morbidity was 41.4%. Older age, gender, steroids, comorbidities, and perforation were significantly associated with morbidity.

CONCLUSION

Today, mortality from CD excluding perforation is reduced compared with past data. This, coupled with the fact that the majority of these patients presented with CD as their first episode, calls into question the current practice of elective resection as a stratagem for reducing mortality. Immunocompromised patients may benefit from early resection. New prospective data is needed to redefine target groups for prophylactic resection.

Mortality after appendectomy in Sweden, 1987-1996

OBJECTIVE

To study mortality after appendectomy.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

The management of patients with suspected appendicitis remains controversial, with advocates of early surgery as well as of expectant management. Mortality is not known.

METHODS

The authors conducted a complete follow-up of deaths within 30 days after all appendectomies in Sweden (population 8.9 million) during the years 1987 to 1996 (n = 117,424) by register linkage. The case fatality rate (CFR) and the standardized mortality ratio (SMR) were analyzed by discharge diagnosis.

RESULTS

The CFR was 2.44 per 1,000 appendectomies. It was strongly related to age (0.31 per 1,000 appendectomies at 0-9 years of age, decreasing to 0.07 at 20-29 years, and reaching 164 among nonagenarians) and diagnosis at surgery (0.8 per 1,000 appendectomies after nonperforated appendicitis, 5.1 after perforated appendicitis, 1.9 after appendectomies for nonsurgical abdominal pain, and 10.0 for those with other diagnoses). The SMR showed a sevenfold excess rate of deaths after appendectomy compared with the general population. The relation to age was less marked (SMR of 44.4 at 0-9 years, decreasing to 2.4 in patients aged 20-29 years. and reaching 8.1 in nonagenarians). The SMR was doubled after perforation compared with nonperforated appendicitis (6.5 and 3.5, respectively). Nonsurgical abdominal pain and other diagnoses were associated with a high excess rate of deaths (9.1 and 14.9, respectively). The most common causes of deaths were appendicitis, ischemic heart diseases and tumors, followed by gastrointestinal diseases.

CONCLUSIONS

The CFR after appendectomy is high in elderly patients. The excess rate of death for patients with nonperforated appendicitis and nonsurgical abdominal pain suggests that the deaths may partly be caused by the surgical trauma. Increased diagnostic efforts rather than urgent appendectomy are therefore warranted among frail patients with an equivocal diagnosis of appendicitis.

Colonoscopic perforation: incidence, risk factors, management and outcome

This review discusses the incidence, risk factors, management and outcome of colonoscopic perforation (CP). The incidence of CP ranges from 0.016% to 0.2% following diagnostic colonoscopies and could be up to 5% following some colonoscopic interventions. The perforations are frequently related to therapeutic colonoscopies and are associated with patients of advanced age or with multiple comorbidities. Management of CP is mainly based on patients' clinical grounds and their underlying colorectal diseases. Current therapeutic approaches include conservative management (bowel rest plus the administration of broad-spectrum antibiotics), endoscopic management, and operative management (open or laparoscopic approach). The applications of each treatment are discussed. Overall outcomes of patients with CP are also addressed.

Predictors of survival after curative resection of carcinoma of the colon and rectum

Of 668 Rochester, Minnesota residents with colon or rectal cancer diagnosed from 1940 through 1979, 400 (60%) were operated on for cure and had a known disease stage. The influence of patient sex, age, and decade of diagnosis, disease stage, grade, site, and size, and the presence of obstruction or perforation were examined as prognostic factors for death, death from colorectal cancer, and cancer recurrence. In this population-based inception cohort, overall survival was independently associated with male sex (P = 0.0002), older age (P less than 0.001), and more advanced disease stage (P less than 0.001). Death due to colon cancer, on the other hand, was associated with disease stage (P less than 0.0001), more advanced grade (P = 0.016), and the presence of obstruction (P = 0.003). One hundred seven (27%) patients had a recurrence of their colon cancer. Seventy-one percent of recurrences were evident within the first 2 years and 91% by 5 years. Recurrence was associated with disease stage (P less than 0.0001), grade (P = 0.006), and the presence of perforation (P = 0.012).

Current diagnostic approaches lack sensitivity in the diagnosis of perforated blunt small bowel injury: analysis from 275,557 trauma admissions from the EAST multi-institutional HVI trial

OBJECTIVES

Blunt SBI is infrequent and its diagnosis may be difficult, especially in the face of confounding variables. The purpose of this study was to evaluate methods for making the diagnosis of blunt SBI.

METHODS

Patients with blunt small bowel injury (SBI) were identified from the registries of 95 trauma centers for a 2-year period (1998-1999). Patients with SBI (cases) were matched by age and Injury Severity Score with a blunt trauma patient receiving an abdominal workup who did not have SBI (controls).

RESULTS

Logistic regression models were unable to differentiate SBI with perforation from SBI without perforation. Thirteen percent of patients with documented perforating SBI had normal abdominal computed tomographic scans preoperatively.

CONCLUSION

Alone or in combination, current diagnostic approaches lack sensitivity in the diagnosis of perforated SBI. Improvements in diagnostic methods and approaches are needed to ensure the prompt diagnosis of this uncommon but potentially devastating injury.

Significance of Candida recovered from intraoperative specimens in patients with intra-abdominal perforations

OBJECTIVE

Determine the significance of recovering yeasts from intraoperative specimens from the abdominal cavity and to evaluate the effect of a single intraoperative dose of fluconazole on clinical outcome in patients with intra-abdominal perforations.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, double-blind study.

SETTING

Multicenter study from 13 hospitals in Norway.

PATIENTS

One hundred nine patients with intra-abdominal perforations.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomized to receive either a single 400-mg fluconazole dose or placebo during the operation.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

An intra-abdominal specimen for microbiological culture was obtained at the time of the operation. The primary response variable in the study was death. Secondary response variables were three parameters indicating a complicated postoperative period: mechanical ventilation for > or = 5 days, intensive care treatment for > or = 10 days, and use of a central venous catheter for > or = 10 days. Yeasts were recovered from a intraoperative intra-abdominal specimen from only 1 (3.5%) of 28 patients with perforated appendicitis and from 32 (39.5%) of 81 nonappendicitis patients. Excluding the appendicitis patients, the yeast recovery rate was high both for patients hospitalized at the time of the perforation (45%) and for nonhospitalized patients (32%). The overall mortality was 11% (12 patients). Single-dose intraoperative fluconazole prophylaxis did not reach a statistically significant effect on mortality (4 of 53 patients in the fluconazole group and 8 of 56 patients in the placebo group died [p = .059]). The only two explanatory variables significantly related to death were a intraoperative finding of yeast from an intra-abdominal specimen and the occurrence of a spontaneous perforation in a patient already hospitalized for nonsurgical cancer treatment. Detection of yeast was also a significant explanatory variable for a prolonged period of mechanical ventilation, intensive care treatment, and prolonged use of a central venous catheter.

CONCLUSIONS

Single-dose intraoperative fluconazole prophylaxis did not have a statistically significant effect on overall mortality (odds ratio = 0.21; 95% confidence interval, 0.04-1.06; p = .059) in patients with intra-abdominal perforation. The recovery rate of yeast from intraoperative specimens from the abdominal cavity was high (>30%) and was associated with death and a complicated postoperative course.

Risk for lower intestinal perforations in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with tocilizumab in comparison to treatment with other biologic or conventional synthetic DMARDs

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the risk of developing lower intestinal perforations (LIPs) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated with tocilizumab (TCZ).

METHODS

In 13 310 patients with RA observed in the German biologics register Rheumatoid Arthritis: Observation of Biologic Therapy, 141 serious gastrointestinal events possibly associated with perforations were reported until 31 October 2015. All events were validated independently by two physicians, blinded for treatment exposure.

RESULTS

37 LIPs (32 in the colon/sigma) were observed in 53 972 patient years (PYs). Only two patients had a history of diverticulitis (one in TCZ). Age, current/cumulative glucocorticoids and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were significantly associated with the risk of LIP. The crude incidence rate of LIP was significantly increased in TCZ (2.7/1000 PYs) as compared with all other treatments (0.2-0.6/1000 PYs). The adjusted HR (ref: conventional synthetic (cs) disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs)) in TCZ was 4.48 (95% CI 2.0 to 10.0), in tumour necrosis factor-α inhibitor (TNFi) 1.04 (0.5 to 2.3) and in other biologic DMARDs 0.33 (0.1 to 1.4). 4/11 patients treated with TCZ presented without typical symptoms of LIP (acute abdomen, severe pain). Only one patient had highly elevated C reactive protein (CRP). One quarter of patients died within 30 days after LIP (9/37), 5/11 under TCZ, 2/13 under TNFi and 2/11 under csDMARD treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence rates of LIP under TCZ found in this real world study are in line with those seen in randomised controlled trials of TCZ and higher than in all other DMARD treatments. To ensure safe use of TCZ in daily practice, physicians and patients should be aware that, under TCZ, LIP may occur with mild symptoms only and without CRP elevation.

Outcome after emergency surgery for cancer of the large intestine

The data for 77 patients with colorectal cancer who underwent emergency surgery for acute intestinal obstruction (57 patients) or perforation (20 patients) within 24 h of admission were evaluated. The patients were older and had more advanced disease than patients undergoing elective surgery for colorectal cancer. Emergency surgery for carcinoma of the right colon consisted of primary resection in 95 per cent of cases and was followed by a 28 per cent mortality rate. Perforated tumours of the left colon and rectum were managed by primary resection in 82 per cent of cases with a 22 per cent mortality rate. In contrast, obstructing tumours of the left colon and rectum were treated by primary resection in 38 per cent of cases with a 6 per cent mortality rate, and by primary decompression in 62 per cent of cases with a 25 per cent mortality rate. The overall postoperative mortality rate was 23 per cent and increased with advanced tumour disease, perforation and peritonitis. Cardiac decompensation and intraabdominal sepsis were the major causes of death. Although the long-term survival rate following emergency surgery was worse than after elective surgery, improvements in outcome should be achieved by better management of the initial emergency situation.

1,635 Endoscopic submucosal dissection cases in the esophagus, stomach, and colorectum: complication rates and long-term outcomes

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) enables en bloc resection of early gastrointestinal neoplasms; however, most ESD articles report small series, with short-term outcomes performed by multiple operators on single organ. We assessed short- and long-term treatment outcomes following ESD for early neoplasms throughout the gastrointestinal tract.

METHODS

We performed a longitudinal cohort study in single tertiary care referral center. A total of 1,635 early gastrointestinal neoplasms (stomach 1,136; esophagus 138; colorectum 361) were treated by ESD by single operator. Outcomes were complication rates, en bloc R0 resection rates, and long-term overall and disease-specific survival rates at 3 and 5 years for both guideline and expanded criteria for ESD.

RESULTS

En bloc R0 resection rates were: stomach: 97.1 %; esophagus: 95.7 %; colorectum: 98.3 %. Postoperative bleeding and perforation rates respectively were: stomach: 3.6 and 1.8 %; esophagus: 0 and 0 %; colorectum: 1.7 and 1.9 %. Intra criteria resection rates were: stomach: 84.9 %; esophagus: 81.2 %; colorectum: 88.6 %. Three-year survival rates for lesions meeting Japanese ESD guideline/expanded criteria were for all organ-combined: 93.4/92.7 %. Five-year rates were: stomach: 88.1/84.6 %; esophagus: 81.6/57.3 %; colorectum: 94.3/100 %. Median follow-up period was 53.4 (range, 0.07-98.6) months. Follow-up rate was 94 % (1,020/1,085). There was no recurrence or disease-related death.

CONCLUSIONS

In this large series by single operator, ESD was associated with high curative resection rates and low complication rates across the gastrointestinal tract. Disease-specific and overall long-term prognosis for patients with lesions within intra criteria after curative resection appeared to be excellent.

Inadvertent perforation during rectal cancer resection in Norway

Background

Inadvertent perforation of the bowel or tumour is a relatively common complication during resection of rectal cancer. The purpose of this study was to examine intraoperative perforation following the introduction of mesorectal excision as a standard surgical technique in Norway.

Methods

This was a prospective national cohort study of 2873 patients undergoing major resection of rectal carcinoma at 54 Norwegian hospitals from November 1993 to December 1999.

Results

The overall perforation rate was 8·1 per cent (234 of 2873 patients). In a multivariate analysis, the risk of perforation was significantly greater in patients undergoing abdominoperineal resection (odds ratio (OR) 5·6 (95 per cent confidence interval (c.i.) 3·5 to 8·8)) and in those aged 80 years or more (OR 2·0 (95 per cent c.i. 1·2 to 3·5)). The 5-year local recurrence rate was 28·8 per cent following perforation, compared with 9·9 per cent in patients with no perforation (P &lt; 0·001); survival rates were 41·5 and 67·1 per cent respectively (P &lt; 0·001).

Conclusion

The risk of intraoperative perforation was significantly greater in patients with rectal cancer undergoing abdominoperineal resection and in those aged 80 years or more. The high local recurrence rates and reduced survival following perforation call for increased attention to avoid this complication.

Complications in endoscopy of the lower gastrointestinal tract. Therapy and prognosis

This is a report on 126 prospectively registered and controlled complications in 29,695 consecutive endoscopic procedures of the lower gastrointestinal tract. The overall complication rate is 0.4%. All endoscopic procedures were performed in our institution; no referrals "from other hospitals" are included. The therapy and prognosis of occurring complications are described. Especially after therapeutic endoscopy--above all, after polypectomy--the complication rate of 0.83% is not negligible. A serious aspect is the average interval of 30 h from endoscopically caused complication to the onset of symptoms. Bleeding could be managed conservatively in 76% of cases. Nevertheless perforation and transmural burn injuries required surgical intervention in 78% of cases. The authors conclude that in the case of transmural burn an attempt at "active conservative treatment" is justified if the patient is under close surgical control, if the symptoms improve, and if there is a possibility of immediate surgery.

Fatal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage or perforation among users and nonusers of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in Saskatchewan, Canada 1983

We report a cohort study of fatal upper GI hemorrhage and/or perforation in relation to use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) among the one million residents of Saskatchewan Canada in 1983. All hospitalized cases of GI hemorrhage and/or perforation with a fatal outcome were identified using the records linkage system of the Saskatchewan Department of Health. Discharge summaries and autopsy records were reviewed to select the cases of upper GI hemorrhage or upper GI perforation and to exclude cases in which known risk factors were present. The 134,060 residents who filled one or more prescriptions for an NSAID in 1983 were identified and individually linked to their hospital records by patient identification number. The age- and gender-specific incidence of fatal upper GI hemorrhage and/or perforation in the absence of risk factors in users was compared to that in nonusers, controlling for recent history of upper GI disease. Fatal upper GI hemorrhage or perforation in temporal association with NSAIDs is extremely rare in persons younger than 75 years of age. No temporally-related cases occurred in male NSAID users age 75 and older, but NSAID usage in this group was limited. Among women age 75 and older, the rate in users was higher than in nonusers, with the highest rate being in female NSAID users age 75 and older with a recent history of upper GI disease. Total mortality among women age 75 and older was slightly lower among users than among nonusers. Physicians who prescribe NSAIDs to patients age 75 and older should be aware of the potential risks, particularly in those with predisposing factors such as a history of upper GI disease.

Factors influencing mortality after curative resection for large bowel cancer in elderly patients

Mortality rates from the Large Bowel Cancer Project are presented with special reference to patients older than 70 years. The in-hospital mortality rate among those who underwent curative resection for colorectal carcinoma was 7%. Unlike long-term prognosis, which is influenced by pathological features, in-hospital mortality is influenced largely by clinical factors. Age was an adverse factor (78% of deaths occurred among those aged over 70, who formed 46% of the study population), as was obstruction or perforation. 55% of deaths were due to cardiopulmonary complications. Educating patients to seek treatment early, careful preoperative assessment and postoperative monitoring of cardiopulmonary function, and, in selected patients, use of local treatments rather than wide resections may help to reduce mortality in elderly patients.

Incidence and case fatality rates for acute appendicitis in California. A population-based study of the effects of age

In 1984, 24,794 appendectomies and abscess drainage procedures were performed for acute appendicitis in California hospitals. Analysis of hospital discharge abstracts revealed age- and sex-specific incidence rates and in-hospital case fatality rates for acute appendicitis lower than previously reported. In persons aged 60 years and older, the case fatality rate for nonperforating appendicitis with appendectomy was 0.7% and for perforating appendicitis and abscess 2.4%. Surgery was delayed beyond the day of admission in 21% of persons aged 40-59 years, 29% of persons aged 60-79 years, and 47% of persons aged 80 years and over. The proportion of cases with perforation increased from 22% to 75% between ages 20 and 80 years. The population incidence of perforating appendicitis changed little after age 20 years, while the incidence of nonperforating cases declined sharply. The high proportion of appendicitis cases with perforation among the elderly may be due to the decreased incidence of nonperforating appendicitis in the elderly and not to a greater propensity for perforation, as previously proposed. Most elderly in California receive timely surgery for appendicitis and tolerate it better than previously reported. Diminished tolerance for intra-abdominal infection may be the primary determinant of the increase in case fatality with age.

The impact of blood loss, obstruction and perforation on survival in patients undergoing curative resection for colon cancer

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have drawn attention to the high postoperative mortality and poor survival of patients who present as an emergency with colon cancer. However, these patients are a heterogeneous group. The aim of the present study was to establish, having adjusted for case mix, the size of the differences in postoperative mortality and 5-year survival between patients presenting as an emergency with evidence of blood loss, obstruction and perforation.

METHODS

The study included 2068 patients who presented with colon cancer between 1991 and 1994 in Scotland. Five-year survival rates and the adjusted hazard ratios were calculated.

RESULTS

Thirty-day postoperative mortality following potentially curative resection was consistently higher in patients who presented with evidence of blood loss, obstruction or perforation (all P < 0.005) than in elective patients. Following potentially curative surgery, cancer-specific survival at 5 years was 74.6 per cent compared with 60.9, 51.6 and 46.5 per cent in those who presented with blood loss, obstruction and perforation respectively (all P < 0.001). The corresponding adjusted hazard ratios (95 per cent confidence interval) for cancer-specific survival, relative to elective patients, were 1.62 (1.22 to 2.15), 2.22 (1.78 to 2.75) and 2.93 (1.82 to 4.70) for patients presenting with evidence of blood loss, obstruction or perforation (all P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Compared with patients who undergo elective surgery for colon cancer, those who present as an emergency with evidence of blood loss, obstruction or perforation have higher postoperative mortality rates and poorer cancer-specific survival.

Bowel perforation in steroid-treated patients

Gastrointestinal perforation in patients receiving glucocorticosteroid (GCS) therapy has been reported to have mortality rates as high as 100%. From 79 patients seen during a nine-year period, three groups were formed according to GCS dosage: group 1 (steroid perioperative coverage), group 2 (low-dose steroids, prednisone < 20 mg daily), and group 3 (high-dose steroids, prednisone greater than or equal to 20 mg daily). Of 11 clinical presentation factors, only abdominal tenderness was consistently present in group 3. The mean delay from onset of symptoms to treatment for group 3 was 8.3 days and was in marked contrast to that for group 1 or 2, 1.7 and 2.2 days, respectively (p < 0.005). Mortality increased from 11.8% in group 1 to 13.3% in group 2 to 85% in group 3. High-dose GCS therapy decreased the clinical expression of peritonitis to the point that recognition and, therefore, treatment of gastrointestinal perforation were markedly delayed. In a patient receiving high-dose GCS, a high degree of clinical suspicion must accompany any new abdominal discomfort, and aggressive diagnostic efforts should be made to establish the cause. If abdominal pain persists, surgical exploration should be considered.

Prevalence of perforated sigmoid diverticulitis is increasing

INTRODUCTION

The population of Finland is aging fast, and dietary fiber consumption has decreased during the past few decades; the prevalence of sigmoid diverticular perforation can therefore be anticipated to increase. This study presents our experience concerning the outcome of 133 patients admitted to a university hospital for diverticular perforation during a 15-year period.

METHODS

One hundred thirty-three patients admitted into our hospital for sigmoid diverticular perforation during the 15-year period from 1986 to 2000 were identified using a computer database. Clinical data were reviewed from the database and the patients' records.

RESULTS

The annual prevalence of perforated sigmoid diverticulitis is increasing. It was 2.4 per 100,000 in the year 1986 and 3.8 per 100,000 in the year 2000. The resection rate was 90 percent; after resection, 45 primary anastomoses, 75 Hartmann's colostomies, and 1 covering colostomy were performed. The overall complication rate was 32 percent, without any significant difference between the procedures. Of the clinical variables, the Mannheim Peritonitis Index scores (P = 0.0088) and the number of previous hospital treatments (P = 0.035) correlated with postoperative complications. Overall mortality was 9 percent, without any significant difference between the procedures. Of the clinical variables, the Mannheim Peritonitis Index scores correlated with mortality. Of the 12 patients who died, 11 had Mannheim Peritonitis Index scores of 21 or more (P = 0.0001). Forty-five percent of the colostomies have been closed.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of perforated sigmoid diverticulitis is increasing in northern Finland. Mannheim Peritonitis Index score can be used in predicting the outcome of patients admitted for perforated sigmoid diverticulitis.

Prognostic factors for mortality in left colonic peritonitis: a new scoring system

BACKGROUND

Perforating lesions of the colon affect a heterogeneous group of patients, often elderly, and usually present as abdominal emergencies, with high morbidity and mortality. The aims of this study were to assess the prognostic value of specific factors in patients with left colonic peritonitis and to evaluate the utility of a scoring method that allows one to define groups of patients with different mortality risks.

STUDY DESIGN

Between January 1994 and December 1999, 156 patients (77 men and 79 women), with a mean (SD) age of 63.2 years (15.5 years) (range 22 to 87 years), underwent emergency operation for a distal colonic perforation. Intraoperative colonic lavage was the first choice operation and it was performed in 74 patients (47.4%). There were three alternative procedures: the Hartmann operation was performed in 69 patients (44.2%), subtotal colectomy in 9, and colostomy in 4 patients. We analyzed specific variables for their possible relation to death including gender, age, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, immunocompromised status, etiology, and degree of peritonitis, preoperative organ failure, time (hours) between hospital admission and surgical intervention, and degree of temperature elevation (38 degrees C). Univariate relations between predictors and outcomes (death) were analyzed using logistic regression. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to assess the prognostic value of combinations of the variables. Significant factors identified in univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to define a left colonic Peritonitis Severity Score (PSS). Factors that were significant only in univariate analysis scored 2 points if present and 1 if not. Variables significant in multivariate analysis were scored from 1 to 3 points. Patients were randomly split into two groups, one to calculate the scoring system and the other to validate it.

RESULTS

Overall postoperative mortality rate was 22.4%. Septic-related mortality was observed in 24 patients (15.4%). Age, peritonitis grade, ASA score, immunocompromised status, and ischemic colitis were significant for postoperative death in univariate analysis. But only ASA score and preoperative organ failure were significantly associated with postoperative mortality in multivariate logistic regression analysis. The PSS, as defined in this study, was related to outcomes of patients. Mortality rate increased from 0%, when PSS was 6 points (minimum possible score), to 100% in patients with a PSS of 13 (maximum possible PSS = 14).

CONCLUSIONS

Left colonic peritonitis continues to have a persistently high mortality in patients with septic complications. ASA score and preoperative organ failure are the only factors that are significantly associated with mortality in the multivariate analysis. The PSS classification may help uniformly define the mortality risk of patients with distal large bowel peritonitis, and may help to increase the comparability of studies carried out at different centers.

Peritoneal drainage as definitive treatment for neonates with isolated intestinal perforation

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

To better define the indications for peritoneal drainage (PD) in premature babies with intestinal perforation, the authors reviewed their experience with this procedure in a tertiary neonatal intensive care setting.

METHODS

The charts of all neonates who underwent PD as initial treatment for intestinal perforation between 1996 and 1999 were reviewed. Those patients with pneumatosis intestinalis on abdominal radiograph had perforated necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) diagnosed; whereas, those infants with no pneumatosis had isolated intestinal perforation diagnosed. The clinical characteristics and outcomes of these 2 groups were compared.

RESULTS

Twenty-one premature neonates had primary PD between 1996 and 1999, 10 for isolated intestinal perforation and 11 for perforated NEC. Patients with isolated intestinal perforation had lower birth weights (708 v 949 g; P < .05), were less likely to have started feedings (30% v 91%, P < .05), and the perforation developed at an earlier age (10.6 v 28.0 d, P < .05) compared with the patients who had perforated NEC. Only 2 of 10 infants with isolated perforation required subsequent laparotomy (at 10 weeks for stricture and 12 weeks for a persistent fistula). For these patients, the long-term survival rate was 90%. In contrast, 8 of 11 infants with perforated NEC required laparotomy, and although the 30-day survival rate was 64%, the long-term survival rate was only 27%.

CONCLUSIONS

Peritoneal drainage provides successful and definitive treatment for most premature babies with isolated intestinal perforation. For neonates with perforation caused by NEC, peritoneal drainage may provide temporary stabilization, but most of these infants require subsequent laparotomy, and few survive.

Potentially lethal complications of shigellosis

Complications that can lead to death during shigellosis include intestinal as well as systemic manifestations. The former include intestinal perforation, toxic megacolon, and dehydration, and the latter include sepsis, hyponatremia, hypoglycemia, seizures and encephalopathy, hemolyticuremic syndrome, pneumonia, and malnutrition. Data on the frequency of these complications come primarily from hospital-based studies, in which sepsis-either with Shigella or with other Enterobacteriaceae-and hypoglycemia are the most common causes of death. Management of these two complications requires broad-spectrum empiric antibiotic treatment of all severely ill, malnourished patients with shigellosis as well as frequent feedings to prevent hypoglycemia. Unfortunately, in developing countries, access to parenteral broad-spectrum antimicrobial agents is often limited, and frequent feedings are often precluded by the severe anorexia that is characteristic of shigellosis. Realistic approaches to the reduction of mortality from shigellosis must continue to focus on prevention and early antimicrobial therapy rather than on treatment of established complications.