Predictive capacity of pre-donation GFR and renal reserve capacity for donor renal function after living kidney donation

Kidney transplantation from living donors is important to reduce organ shortage. Reliable pre-operative estimation of post-donation renal function is essential. We evaluated the predictive potential of pre-donation glomerular filtration rate (GFR) (iothalamate) and renal reserve capacity for post-donation GFR in kidney donors. GFR was measured in 125 consecutive donors (age 49 +/- 11 years; 36% male) 119 +/- 99 days before baseline GFR (GFRb) and 57 +/- 16 days after donation (GFRpost). Reserve capacity was assessed as GFR during stimulation by low-dose dopamine (GFRdopa), amino acids (GFRAA) and both (GFRmax). GFRb was 112 +/- 18, GFRdopa 124 +/- 22, GFRAA 127 +/- 19 and GFRmax 138 +/- 22 mL/min. After donation, GFR remained 64 +/- 7%. GFRpost was predicted by GFRb(R2 = 0.54), GFRdopa(R2 = 0.35), GFRAA(R2 = 0.56), GFRmax(R2 = 0.55)and age (R2 = -0.22; p < 0.001 for all). Linear regression provided the equation GFRpost = 20.01 + (0.46*GFRb). Multivariate analysis predicted GFRpost by GFRb, age and GFRmax(R2 = 0.61, p < 0.001). Post-donation renal function impairment (GFR < or = 60 mL/min/1.73 m2) occurred in 31 donors. On logistic regression, GFRb, body mass index (BMI) and age were independent predictors for renal function impairment, without added value of reserve capacity. GFR allows a relatively reliable prediction of post-donation GFR, improving by taking age and stimulated GFR into account. Long-term studies are needed to further assess the prognostic value of pre-donation characteristics and to prospectively identify subjects with higher risk for renal function loss.

Donor factors influencing graft outcomes in live donor kidney transplantation

Living donor renal allograft survival is superior to that achieved from deceased donors, although graft outcome is suboptimal in some of these patients. In an effort to identify the subset of patients at high risk for poor outcomes we studied donor risk factors in 248 living kidney donor-recipient pairs. Unadjusted donor (125)I-iothalamate GFR (iGFR), donor age more than 45 years, donor total cholesterol level less than 200 mg/dL, and donor systolic blood pressure (SBP) less than 120 mm Hg were correlated with allograft estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and incidence of acute rejection (AR), delayed graft function and/or graft loss at 2 years posttransplantation. Donor iGFR less than 110 mL/min (slope=-7.40, P<0.01), donors more than 45 years (slope=-8.76, P<0.01), donor total cholesterol levels more than 200 mg/dL (slope=-10.03, P<0.01), and SBP more than 120 mm Hg (slope=-5.60, P=0.03) were associated with lower eGFR. By multivariable linear regression analysis these variables remained independently associated with lower eGFR, and poorer outcomes. The increasing number of donor factors (age, iGFR, cholesterol, and blood pressure) was directly associated with worse posttransplant eGFR (P<0.01). In conclusion, our data suggest that routine assessment of living donor parameters could supplement the consideration of recipient characteristics in predicting posttransplant risk of graft injury/dysfunction.

Psychosocial Assessment of Living Organ Donors: Clinical and Ethical Considerations

This article outlines psychosocial and ethical issues to be considered when evaluating potential living organ donors. Six types of living donors are described: genetically related, emotionally related, “Good Samaritan” (both directed and nondirected), vendors, and organ exchangers. The primary domains to be assessed in the psychosocial evaluation are informed consent, motivation for donating and the decision-making process, adequacy of support (financial and social), behavioral and psychological health, and the donor-recipient relationship. Obstacles to the evaluation process include impression management, overt deception, minimization of behavioral risk factors, and cultural and language differences between the donor and the evaluator. Ethical concerns, such as the right to donate, donor autonomy, freedom from coercion, nonmaleficence and beneficence in donor selection, conflicts of interest, “reasonable” risks to donors, and recipient decision making are also explored. To fully evaluate living organ donation, studying psychosocial as well as medical outcomes is crucial.

Estimation of standard liver volume in Chinese adult living donors

AIM

To determine a formula predicting the standard liver volume based on body surface area (BSA) or body weight in Chinese adults.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 115 consecutive right-lobe living donors not including the middle hepatic vein underwent right hemi-hepatectomy. No organs were used from prisoners, and no subjects were prisoners. Donor anthropometric data including age, gender, body weight, and body height were recorded prospectively. The weights and volumes of the right lobe liver grafts were measured at the back table. Liver weights and volumes were calculated from the right lobe graft weight and volume obtained at the back table, divided by the proportion of the right lobe on computed tomography. By simple linear regression analysis and stepwise multiple linear regression analysis, we correlated calculated liver volume and body height, body weight, or body surface area.

RESULTS

The subjects had a mean age of 35.97 +/- 9.6 years, and a female-to-male ratio of 60:55. The mean volume of the right lobe was 727.47 +/- 136.17 mL, occupying 55.59% +/- 6.70% of the whole liver by computed tomography. The volume of the right lobe was 581.73 +/- 96.137 mL, and the estimated liver volume was 1053.08 +/- 167.56 mL. Females of the same body weight showed a slightly lower liver weight. By simple linear regression analysis and stepwise multiple linear regression analysis, a formula was derived based on body weight. All formulae except the Hong Kong formula overestimated liver volume compared to this formula.

CONCLUSIONS

The formula of standard liver volume, SLV (mL) = 11.508 x body weight (kg) + 334.024, may be applied to estimate liver volumes in Chinese adults.

Extended indications in living-donor liver transplantation: bile duct cancer

The advantages of living donor liver transplantation are an individually available graft and a tremendously reduced waiting time until transplantation. One consequence is that many centers have extended the pretransplant selection criteria, especially for potential recipients suffering from hepatocellular carcinoma. In contrast, reports on living donor liver transplantation for cholangiocarcinoma are restricted to few case reports. We have analyzed our experience with seven patients suffering from cholangiocarcinoma (Klatskin tumors, n=5; intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, n=2). During a median follow-up of 20 months (range 2-46 months), all patients are alive except for one posttransplant death. Four patients suffering from Klatskin tumors are alive without recurrence; both patients suffering from intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma are alive with bone and peritoneal metastases. Living donor liver transplantation may be beneficial in selected patients suffering from Klatskin tumors, whereas caution should prevail when considering intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Living-unrelated donor renal transplantation: an alternative to living-related donor transplantation?

INTRODUCTION

An increasing number of living-unrelated, kidney donor transplants are being performed in our unit. We present a comparison of living-unrelated (LURD) and living-related donor (LRD) renal transplant outcomes and analyse influencing factors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analysed the outcome of all living-donor renal transplants performed at our centre from 1993 to 2004. The parameters studied included patient and graft survival, functioning status of grafts (determined by estimated GFR) at last follow-up and any rejection episodes. Multivariate analysis was performed for recipient and donor age, ethnicity, HLA matching and re-transplants.

RESULTS

A total of 322 live donor kidney transplants (LRD, n = 261; LURD, n = 61) were carried out over this period. Mean recipient age was 28 +/- 16 years in the LRD group and 48 +/- 12 years in LURD, while mean age of the donors was 43 +/- 11 years and 48 +/- 10 years, respectively. Caucasians constituted 80% of all the living donors. Amongst LRD, parents were the commonest (58%) donors followed by siblings (35%). In LURD, 80% were spouses. A total of 33 grafts failed, 30 in LRD (11%) and 3 in LURD (5%). Thirteen patients died, 11 (4.2%) in LRD (7 with functioning graft) and 2 (3.3%) in LURD (1 with functioning graft). Acute rejections occurred in 41% recipients in LRD and 35% in LURD (P = 0.37). Estimated GFR was lower in LURD than in LRD (49 +/- 14 versus 59 +/- 29 ml/min/1.73 m(2); P = 0.032). One- and 3-year patient survival for LRD and LURD was 98.7% and 96.3% and 97.7% and 95%, respectively (P = 0.75). One- and 3-year graft survival was equivalent at 94.8% and 92.3% for LRD, and 98.4% and 93.7% for LURD, respectively (P = 0.18).

CONCLUSIONS

Outcome of LRD and LURD is comparable in terms of patient and graft survival, acute rejection rate and estimated GFR despite differences in demographics, HLA matching and re-transplants of recipients.

The evaluation of prospective renal transplant recipients and living donors

The evaluation of transplant candidates should be directed to ensuring that the risks of surgery and immunosuppression are acceptable. The evaluation should also attempt to determine the likelihood of the graft functioning well enough and long enough to improve the quality of life of the recipient. The primary goal in the evaluation of a potential living donor is to ensure the donor's safety. Both the short- and long-term risks of donation need to be carefully assessed.

Living unrelated kidney transplantation

The use of living donors, particularly if unrelated, in kidney transplantation is still not recommended although many transplant centers have come to accept the procedure. Usually the main argument against this approach is ethical. Acknowledging this problem, we accept biologically unrelated donors only if they have an emotional closeness to the recipient. From November 1982 to November 1997, 527 kidney allografts from living donors were performed at our institution. Of these 302 living donors were first-degree relatives of the recipient and shared one haplotype (LRD) and 172 were unrelated(LURD). Among the LURD group 146 donors were "emotionally related"--wife to husband 110 cases and husband to wife 35 cases and 1 case from a nun to a friar. Statistical analysis of the results was performed with the chi(2) method. Actuarial graft survival rates in the LRD and LURD groups were 91% and 87% at 1 year, 77% and 79% at 5 years, and 66% and 69% at 9 years (P =n.s.). In conclusion kidney transplantation between unrelated donors and recipients may be a valid alternative in view of the cadaver organ shortage. It is a procedure that can be performed successfully and that provides a "gift of life" for both the patient and the family.

Liver transplantation in children: the experience of Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong

Seven living-related liver transplants (LRLT) and two reduced-size liver transplants (RSLT) were performed on eight children who suffered from end-stage liver disease, having previously undergone one to three abdominal operations. Their ages at initial transplantation ranged from 8 months to 11 years (mean 35 months, median 12 months). Excluding the two older children aged 7 and 11 years, respectively, the rest of the children weighed 6 to 9.5 kg (mean 7.3 kg) at the time of the initial transplantation. Seven left lateral segments (S2 + 3) and two left lobes (S2 + 3 + 4) were used; of these the smallest graft had a graft-to-recipient body weight ratio of 0.9%. The volunteer living donors were four mothers, two fathers and one sister who were selected after medical and psychiatric evaluations, and their suitability was confirmed by hematological, biochemical, and radiological criteria. During a follow-up period of 3 to 30 months, all eight children are alive and well with normal liver function, one of them having undergone a retransplant LRLT because of hepatitis of undetermined etiology following a RSLT 1.5 years earlier. All seven donors had an uneventful postoperative course and were discharged on day 4 to 7 postoperatively. They have all resumed normal day-to-day activities. There were no complications in the donor group. A variety of complications occurred in the recipients, all of which were overcome. Operating microscope was used to perform all the arterial anastomoses using microvascular techniques. This method has proven to be a major factor in preventing arterial thrombosis even with the smallest of arterial anastomosis where a 1.5-mm diameter recipient artery was anastomosed to a 2.5-mm diameter donor hepatic artery.

Influence of HLA compatibility on success with living-related pediatric liver transplantation

It is not clear how HLA compatibility influences acute rejection and postoperative complications in cadaveric liver transplantation. Even less is known about this factor in pediatric living-related liver transplantation (LRLT). This research assessed HLA compatibility relative to rejection rates and complications in pediatric LRLT. The study retrospectively investigated data from 14 pediatric LRLTs in which the donor and recipient HLA genotypes were determined preoperatively. Three recipients (21.4%) developed biliary complications (two biliary leakage, one bile duct stenosis). Three others (21.4%) developed vascular complications (two hepatic artery thrombosis, one hepatic artery stenosis). Eight recipients (57.1%) were diagnosed with acute rejection. The incidence of acute rejection was not correlated with the number of HLA mismatches (P > .05), or with the number of HLA class I mismatches (P > .05); however, it was negatively correlated with number of HLA class II mismatches (P = .02). Arterial and biliary complications were not correlated with any of these categories of HLA compatibility. In conclusion, the data from this small group of patients provided no evidence that closeness of donor-recipient HLA matching influences outcome in pediatric LRLT.

Lung transplantation. Part II. Postoperative management and results

In part I of this 2-part article on lung transplantation (Western Journal of Medicine 1996; 165:355-363), we reviewed the current indications and operative techniques of the procedure. In part II, we describe the postoperative management and results of lung transplantation. We also discuss current controversies, such as the use of marginal donors, living-related transplants, marginal recipients, and single-versus double-lung transplantation for emphysema or pulmonary hypertension.

Impact analysis: a method for evaluating the impact of factors in clinical renal transplantation

Impact analysis, showing the proportion of patients in each category, is useful in providing a rapid visualization of the current renal transplant situation. It provides a 2-dimensional view of the number of cases and the success rates of each category. From the graphs, one can readily see the impact of changing policies upon overall results. Efforts to reduce cold ischemia time and increase zero HLA-A, -B, -DR mismatched transplants would have a significant impact. Clearly, the greatest adverse impact factor in cadaver kidney transplants today is donor age: transplants from donors aged 40 and older negatively impact current overall success rates.

Children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia who receive T-cell-depleted HLA mismatched marrow allografts from unrelated donors have an increased incidence of primary graft failure but a similar overall transplant outcome

Disparity for HLA in unrelated donor bone marrow transplantation (BMT) increases the risk of graft rejection and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and may compromise transplant outcome. We have compared the outcome of matched and mismatched transplants from unrelated donors in 137 children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Their disease status was complete remission (CR)-1, 24 patients; CR-2, 88 patients; CR-3, 18 patients; CR-4, 2 patients; and relapse, 5 patients. CAMPATH monoclonal antibodies were used for T-cell depletion and cyclosporin A was given to 134 children together with short-course methotrexate in 43, mainly when there was HLA disparity. Fifty-two donor/recipient pairs were HLA-mismatched, 41 at HLA-A and -B and 11 at HLA-DR and -DQ loci. Overall graft failure was increased in recipients of marrow mismatched at either HLA-A, -B, -DR, or -DQ (15.7% v 4.8%; P =.057) mainly because there was a higher proportion of children with primary graft failure (11. 8% v 1.2%; P =.012). The presence of an HLA-C locus mismatch did not independently increase the likelihood of graft failure. There was no significant difference in the incidence of acute GVHD >/= grade 2 between the matched and mismatched groups (P =.849). For patients in CR-2, the risk of relapse post-BMT was significantly lower if leukemic relapse occurred off-treatment (P =.005). The Kaplan-Meier overall and leukemia-free survival (LFS) estimates for recipients of matched and mismatched BMT, respectively, at 36 months were 49% versus 42% (P =.380) and 45% versus 40% (P =.654). Although HLA mismatching results in an increased occurrence of primary graft failure with T-cell-depleted allografts, it allows more donors to be identified rapidly for children with ALL without compromising overall transplant outcome.

Long-term outcomes of renal transplants from spousal and living-related and other living-unrelated donors: a single center experience

BACKGROUND

Deceased donor organ shortage has made living donors (LD) major source for renal transplantation (RTx) in India. Spouses represent an important source of allograft. We carried out a retrospective study of spousal RTx vs. other LDRTx to compare long-term results.

METHODS

This retrospective single-center study was undertaken to evaluate demographic, patient survival, graft survival, function vis-à-vis serum creatinine (SCr) and rejection episodes in 1523 living donor renal allograft recipients from 1998 to 2009. It included spouse donors (n=337) (group 1), living related donors (LRD) (n=969) (group 2), and living unrelated donors (LUD) (n=217) (group 3).

RESULTS

Mean recipient age (years +/- SD)) was 41.48 +/- 8.87, 30.49 +/- 10.61, and 37.13 +/- 13.25, respectively for the three groups who were followed for 4.47 +/- 3.03, 4.47 +/- 3.0 and 5.15 +/- 3.28 years respectively. Female donors were 92.6%, 66.4%, and 41%, mean HLA match was 1.15 +/- 0.93, 3 +/- 1.05 and 1.30 +/- 1.08 respectively. One, 5 and 12 year graft survivals among group 1 were 91.39%, 75.49%, and 73.13%; 90.98%, 74.10% and 64.57% in group 2 and 94.92%, 82.86% and 70.31% in group 3. Patient survival for 1, 5 and 12 years were 89.31%, 72.55% and 66.58% in group 1, 93.57%, 82.25% and 72.23% in group 2, and 92.62%, 79.76% and 66.79% in group 3. Acute rejections were noted in 16.6%, 15.8% and 17% respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In circumstances of organ shortage andunavailability of well developed ABO incompatible transplants, spousal donation is viable option.