Nerve transfer to biceps muscle using a part of ulnar nerve for C5-C6 avulsion of the brachial plexus: anatomical study and report of four cases

Four patients with C5-C6 root avulsion after brachial plexus injury were treated with a transfer of part of a normal functioning nerve in the arm to the motor nerve of the biceps. Ten percent of the bulk of the ulnar nerve was harvested for a suture directly to the motor nerve of the biceps with no significant impairment of hand function.

Peripheral nerve injury and repair

Peripheral nerve injuries are common, and there is no easily available formula for successful treatment. Incomplete injuries are most frequent. Seddon classified nerve injuries into three categories: neurapraxia, axonotmesis, and neurotmesis. After complete axonal transection, the neuron undergoes a number of degenerative processes, followed by attempts at regeneration. A distal growth cone seeks out connections with the degenerated distal fiber. The current surgical standard is epineurial repair with nylon suture. To span gaps that primary repair cannot bridge without excessive tension, nerve-cable interfascicular auto-grafts are employed. Unfortunately, results of nerve repair to date have been no better than fair, with only 50% of patients regaining useful function. There is much ongoing research regarding pharmacologic agents, immune system modulators, enhancing factors, and entubulation chambers. Clinically applicable developments from these investigations will continue to improve the results of treatment of nerve injuries.

Nerve transfer to deltoid muscle using the nerve to the long head of the triceps, part II: a report of 7 cases

PURPOSE

This study reports the results of nerve transfer to the deltoid muscle using the nerve to the long head of the triceps.

METHODS

Seven patients with an average age of 25 years with loss of shoulder abduction secondary to upper brachial plexus injuries had nerve transfer using the nerve to the long head of the triceps to the anterior branch(es) of the axillary nerve through the posterior approach. The spinal accessory nerve was used simultaneously for nerve transfer to the suprascapular nerve. The follow-up period ranged from 18 to 28 months (average, 20 mo).

RESULTS

All patients recovered deltoid power against resistance (M4) at the last follow-up evaluation. Useful functional recovery was achieved in all 7 patients; 5 had excellent recoveries and 2 had good results. The average shoulder abduction was 124 degrees. No notable weakness of elbow extension was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

This method is a reliable and effective procedure for deltoid reconstruction in brachial plexus injury (upper-arm type) and should be combined with spinal accessory nerve transfer to the suprascapular nerve to obtain good shoulder abduction.

Seventh cervical nerve root transfer from the contralateral healthy side for treatment of brachial plexus root avulsion

Cervical root nerve transfer from the contralateral side has been used for the treatment of brachial plexus root avulsion in 49 patients. Resection of C7 root from the healthy side has produced no long-term symptoms or signs. Nine patients with ten recipient nerves have been followed up for more than two years and seven have obtained a functional recovery. This operation offers a new approach for the treatment of brachial plexus root avulsion.

Reconstruction of C5 and C6 brachial plexus avulsion injury by multiple nerve transfers: spinal accessory to suprascapular, ulnar fascicles to biceps branch, and triceps long or lateral head branch to axillary nerve

PURPOSE

In C5 and C6 brachial plexus avulsion lesions, elbow flexion, shoulder abduction, and external rotation are the functions that need to be restored. Because the proximal stumps are not available for grafting, surgical repair is based on nerve transfers. The purpose of this study was to describe and report the results of the use of multiple nerve transfers in the reconstruction of these avulsion injuries.

METHODS

Ten patients had multiple nerve transfers: cranial nerve XI to the suprascapular nerve, ulnar nerve fascicles to the biceps motor branch, and triceps long or lateral head motor branch to the axillary nerve. Triceps branch transfer was performed through a posterior arm incision.

RESULTS

Two years after surgery, all the patients had recovered full elbow flexion; 7 scored M4 and 3 scored M3+ according to Medical Research Council scoring. All the patients had recovered active abduction and external rotation. Abduction recovery averaged 92 degrees (range, 65 degrees-120 degrees) and external rotation, measured from full internal rotation, averaged 93 degrees (range, 80 degrees-120 degrees). Shoulder abduction strength was graded M4 in 3 patients and M3 in the remaining 7 patients. Shoulder external rotation strength was graded M4 in 2 patients, M3 in 5 patients, and M2 in 3 patients. No donor site deficits were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed nerve transfers constitute a valid strategy in C5-C6 avulsion injury reconstruction.

Hypoglossal-facial nerve interpositional-jump graft for facial reanimation without tongue atrophy

The hemitongue paralysis that occurs as a result of a classic hypoglossal-facial nerve crossover procedure can result in profound functional deficits in speech, mastication, and swallowing. The procedure is not an option in patients with bilateral facial paralysis or those at risk for combined cranial nerve deficits. To address some of the drawbacks and limitations of this classic procedure, we developed the hypoglossal-facial nerve interpositional jump graft (12-7 jump graft) procedure. This procedure involves interposing a nerve graft between a partially severed but functionally intact twelfth cranial nerve and the degenerated seventh cranial nerve, and is often combined with other reanimation procedures. To date, we have performed 33 12-7 jump graft procedures in 30 patients (three were treated for bilateral facial paralysis); this report describes the procedure and its indications, and details the results of 23 procedures performed in 20 patients for whom 24-month follow-up data are available. Twelfth nerve deficits occurred in only three patients in this report. Recovery of facial function began between 3 and 24 months postoperatively. Facial tone and symmetry were achieved in every patient, no patient had significant mass movement, and 13 patients (two of whom were treated for bilateral facial paralysis) had excellent and three had superb restoration of facial movement. These results show the 12-7 jump graft to be a valuable adjunct for facial reanimation in selected patients.

End-to-side neurorrhaphy with removal of the epineurial sheath: an experimental study in rats

Terminolateral neurorrhaphies were used up to the beginning of this century. After that, they were no longer reported. We tested the efficacy of a new type of end-to-side neurorrhaphy. A group of 20 rats had the peroneal nerve sectioned, and the distal ending was sutured to the lateral face of the tibial nerve after removing a small epineural window. All experiments were made on the right side, the left one remaining untouched in half the animals of each group. The other half was denervated by sectioning and inverting the endings of the peroneal nerves. In this way, tibial cranial muscles were either normal or denervated on the left side and reinnervated through end-to-side neurorrhaphies on the right side. After 7.8 months, the animals were subjected to electrophysiologic tests, sacrificed, and the nerves and muscles were taken for histologic examination. A response of the tibial cranial muscle was obtained in 90 percent of the animals. The distal ending of the peroneal nerve showed an average of 861 nerve fibers. The average areas of the reinnervated tibial cranial muscles were (microns 2) 1617.81 for M2n (when the contralateral side was normal) and 1579.19 for M2d (when the contralateral was denervated). We conclude that the terminolateral neurorrhaphy is functional, conducting electrical stimuli and allowing the passage of axons from the lateral surface of a healthy nerve, to reconstitute the distal segment of a sectioned nerve. The absence of an incision on the axons of the donor nerve was no impediment to axonal regeneration or to the passage of electrical stimuli. The results demonstrate the possibility of using end-to-side and terminolateral neurorrhaphies for reconstituting neural lesions when only a distal end is available; the reinnervation can be obtained from the lateral face of a healthy nerve.

Nerve transfer to biceps muscle using a part of the ulnar nerve in brachial plexus injury (upper arm type): a report of 32 cases

Thirty-two patients with absent elbow flexion secondary to brachial plexus injury underwent nerve transfer using 1 or 2 fascicles of the ulnar nerve to the motor branch of the biceps muscle. Twenty-six patients had root avulsion injury of C5 and C6; 4 had root avulsion injury of C5, C6, and C7; and 2 had lateral and posterior cord injury with distal injury of the musculocutaneous nerve. The follow-up period ranged from 11 to 40 months (average, 18 months). Thirty patients had biceps strength of M4 (flexion power ranged from 0.5 to 7 kg) and 1 had biceps strength of M3. All but 1 patient demonstrated signs of recovery of the biceps muscle. No notable impairment of hand function was observed.

Combined nerve transfers for C5 and C6 brachial plexus avulsion injury

PURPOSE

To report the results of combined nerve transfer in C5 and C6 brachial plexus avulsion injury.

METHODS

Fifteen patients had nerve transfers: spinal accessory nerve to the suprascapular nerve, a part of the ulnar nerve to the biceps motor branch, and the nerve to the long head of the triceps to the anterior branch of the axillary nerve. Patients were evaluated with regard to elbow flexion, shoulder abduction, and shoulder external rotation.

RESULTS

All patients had recovered full elbow flexion: 13 scored M4 and 2 scored M3. Thirteen of the 15 patients obtained good results. The weight the patients could lift ranged from 0 to 7 kg. All patients had recovery of the deltoid function: 13 scored M4 and 2 scored M3. All 15 patients achieved useful functional recovery. Ten patients experienced excellent recoveries and 5 were classified as having good results. The mean shoulder abduction was 115 degrees . Shoulder external rotation strength was scored as M4 in 9 patients, M3 in 4 patients, and M2 in 2 patients. The range of motion of external rotation that was measured from full internal rotation averaged 97 degrees . No clinical donor nerve deficits were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

We recommend combined nerve transfers for C5 and C6 avulsion root injuries. These nerve transfers have the advantage of a quick recovery time as a result of the short regeneration distance without nerve graft.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, Level IV.

Transfer of fascicles from the ulnar nerve to the nerve to the biceps in the treatment of upper brachial plexus palsy

BACKGROUND

The transfer of one or more ulnar nerve fascicles to the nerve to the biceps can restore elbow flexion in patients with upper brachial plexus palsy. The purposes of the present retrospective study were to evaluate the results of this procedure, to measure the delay in reinnervation of the biceps muscle, and to define the indications for a secondary Steindler flexorplasty.

METHODS

Thirty-two patients with an upper nerve-root brachial plexus injury were reviewed at an average of thirty-one months after the nerve fascicle transfer. The average age of the patients was twenty-eight years. The average time between the injury and the operation was nine months. Patients were evaluated with regard to reinnervation of the biceps, ulnar nerve function, elbow flexion strength, and grip strength.

RESULTS

The average time required for reinnervation of the biceps after nerve fascicle transfer was five months. No motor or sensory deficits related to the ulnar nerve were noted clinically. The average grip strength at the time of the last follow-up was 25 kg (an improvement of 9 kg compared with the preoperative value). After the nerve transfer, twenty-four patients achieved grade-3 elbow flexion strength or better according to the grading system of the Medical Research Council. A Steindler flexorplasty was performed as a secondary procedure in ten patients with persistent grade-3 flexor strength or worse. In eight of these cases, elbow flexion strength improved after nerve transfer and flexorplasty. Overall, thirty of the thirty-two patients achieved a good result (grade-4 strength) or a fair result (grade-3 strength).

CONCLUSIONS

We recommend this procedure for brachial plexus injuries involving the C5-C6 or C5-C6-C7 nerve roots. This procedure spares the C5 nerve root and other nerves for grafting or transfer elsewhere. A secondary Steindler flexorplasty is indicated for patients who have persistent grade-3 elbow flexion strength or worse for at least twelve months after nerve fascicle transfer.

Distal anterior interosseous nerve transfer to the deep motor branch of the ulnar nerve for reconstruction of high ulnar nerve injuries

Proximal ulnar nerve injuries can result in loss of intrinsic muscle function of the hand, and distal nerve transfers provide nerve coaptation close to the target muscle. This retrospective chart review evaluated patient outcome following a distal nerve transfer of the anterior interosseous nerve (AIN) to the deep motor branch of the ulnar nerve. There were eight patient charts reviewed, three women, and five men. The mean patient age was 38 years (standard deviation: 22 years). The mean time from injury to surgery was 3 months (standard deviation: 3 months), and mean postoperative follow-up time was 18 months (standard deviation: 11 months). All patients had reinnervation of the ulnar nerve intrinsic hand muscles with improved postoperative lateral pinch and grip strength. One patient had a secondary tendon transfer. No functional deficit in performing tasks in pronation was reported. The distal nerve transfer of the AIN to the deep motor branch of the ulnar nerve provides good reinnervation of the ulnar-nerve-innervated intrinsic muscles of the hand.

Intercostal nerve transfer of the musculocutaneous nerve in avulsed brachial plexus injuries: evaluation of 66 patients

Intercostal nerve transfer is a well-established and effective technique for irreparable avulsed brachial plexus injuries. Between 1987 and 1989, 66 patients with brachial plexus injuries were treated by means of intercostal nerve transfer to the musculocutaneous nerve, with or without nerve grafts to obtain elbow flexion. The results were evaluated. Five clinical signs--(1) induction of chest pain by squeezing of biceps, (2) proximal biceps contraction, (3) distal biceps contraction, (4) active elbow flexion against gravity, and (5) active elbow flexion against weight--were identified and used as a guide for functional recovery. The overall success rate with motor function of grade 4 or more was 67%. The motor results were better in 1989 (81%) because of greater familiarity with the anatomy and improved surgical technique. The important factors in obtaining a good result are (1) early exploration (less than 5 months after trauma), (2) use of three intercostal nerves, (3) mixed nerve-to-mixed nerve coaptation, (4) nerve repair without grafts and under no tension, and (5) shoulder stability.

A technique for maximizing biceps recovery in brachial plexus reconstruction

In 21 cadaver dissections the intramuscular anatomy of the musculocutaneous nerve and the relative relationship of the motor and sensory components of this nerve were evaluated. Nearly one half of the fibers entering the musculocutaneous nerve terminate in cutaneous receptors. We report five cases in which biceps reinnervation was performed by a surgical technique that minimizes the period of denervation by using motor nerves (medial pectoral nerves) very close to the biceps muscle. This technique also redirects the cutaneous portion (lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve) of the musculocutaneous nerve into the biceps muscle to ensure that the motor fibers are not directed toward cutaneous receptors.

Hemi-contralateral C7 transfer to median nerve in the treatment of root avulsion brachial plexus injury

Because of the poor clinical results in achieving hand function in patients with complete brachial plexus root avulsion with other nerve transfers, we evaluated 111 patients prospectively to evaluate the technique of the hemi-contralateral C7 transfer to the median nerve. The transfer was performed as a primary procedure in 62 patients and as a secondary procedure in additional 49 patients. Twenty-one of the 62 patients in the primary group had sufficient follow-up (at least 3 years) to assess the motor and sensory recovery in the median nerve. The adverse effects of the operation were also analyzed in all 111 patients. Six of the 21 (29%) patients obtained M3 and 4 (19%) experienced M2 recovery of the wrist and finger flexors. Ten (48%) patients obtained S3 and 7 (33%) had S2 recovery in the median nerve area. The rate of the advancing Tinel's sign was markedly different between those achieving M3 function and the remaining patients. Although the age of the patient did not correlate with outcome, patients aged 18 and younger had the best motor recovery (ie, achieving M3 function in 3 of 6 cases). There was no correlation between the timing of the surgery after the initial injury, medical comorbidities, and clinical outcome. After surgery 108 of 111 (97%) patients experienced temporary paresthesia in the median nerve area, which resolved by an average of 2.8 months. Three (3%) patients had motor weakness of the donor limb; this resolved completely in 2 patients and left a mild deficit in wrist extension in 1 patient.

Preliminary Results of Double Nerve Transfer to Restore Elbow Flexion in Upper Type Brachial Plexus Palsies

BACKGROUND

Restoration of elbow flexion is the main objective in the treatment of brachial plexus palsies affecting the upper roots. Transfer of the ulnar nerve to the nerve of the biceps has given satisfactory results, but the restored biceps is often weak in cases with avulsions of the C5-C6-C7 roots, in elderly patients, and after long preoperative delays. The authors decided to investigate a double nerve transfer: one or more fascicles of the ulnar nerve to the nerve to the biceps and a fascicle of the median nerve to the motor branch to the brachialis muscle.

METHODS

The authors operated on 15 patients using this technique. The authors have follow-up of more than 6 months in 10 of them. Six had C5-C6 injuries, three had C5-C6-C7 palsies, and one had sustained an infraclavicular injury. The average age was 27.2 years. The average delay before surgery was 6.6 months. The average follow-up was 12.1 months.

RESULTS

Grade 4 elbow flexion was restored in each of the 10 patients. In 10 cases, the patients were able to lift 1 to 5 kg. There was no secondary deficit in grip strength or sensation.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this technique compare favorably with those of other methods. The percentage of success and the strength of elbow flexion restored were increased without any morbidity. This technique will probably reduce the need for secondary procedures to augment elbow flexion. The authors propose double nerve transfer as a standard procedure in C5-C6 and C5-C6-C7 injuries.

Nerve transfer to deltoid muscle using the nerve to the long head of the triceps, part I: an anatomic feasibility study

PURPOSE

To experimentally evaluate the feasibility of restoring the motor function of the deltoid muscle in patients with complete C5-C6 root injury (upper brachial plexus injury) by transferring the nerve to the long head of the triceps to the anterior branch of the axillary nerve through a posterior approach.

METHODS

The study was performed on shoulder girdles of 36 formalin-embalmed cadavers. The number, diameter, and length of the branches of the axillary nerve at the level of the quadrilateral space were noted. The length and diameter of the nerves to the long head and to the lateral head of triceps at the level of triangular space were recorded. The distances from the acromion angle to the bifurcation of the anterior branch of the axillary nerve, to the origins of the nerve to the long head, and to the origin of the lateral head of the triceps were recorded as well. Nerve biopsy specimens of the axillary nerve and the nerve to the long head of the triceps were obtained from 6 fresh cadavers for histomorphometric evaluation.

RESULTS

The average length of the anterior branch of the axillary nerve in this study, measured from the quadrilateral space to the innervating site, was 44.5 mm (range, 26-62 mm), and the average length of the nerve to the long head of triceps, measured from its origin to the innervating site, was 68.5 mm (range, 30-69 mm). The average diameter of the anterior branches of the axillary nerve and the nerve to the long head of the triceps were 2.1 and 1.1 mm, respectively. The average number of axon fibers in the anterior branch of the axillary nerve was 2,704 and in the nerve to the long head of the triceps was 1,233.

CONCLUSIONS

Using the acromial angle as the landmark, the combined length of the two 2 nerves was longer than the distance between them. The diameter, the number of axons, and the anatomic proximity of the nerve to the long head of the triceps make it a potential source for reinnervation of the anterior branch of the axillary nerve by direct nerve transfer without nerve grafting through posterior approach for the management of upper brachial plexus injuries.

Spinal accessory neurotization for restoration of elbow flexion in avulsion injuries of the brachial plexus

Traumatic root avulsion brachial plexus injuries in 216 patients were treated with spinal accessory-musculocutaneous neurotization to restore elbow flexion. The average postoperative follow-up period was 6 years, with a minimum of 2 years for all patients. The percentage of satisfactory biceps recovery (MRC III or better) was 72.5%. The average interval between the operation and MRC III motor recovery was 17 months. The percentage of poor results increased from 25.5% to 62.5% in patients who underwent operation later than 9 months after injury. This method of neurotization produces a result comparable with, if not better than, the results of other types of neurotization in restoration of elbow flexion.

Supercharged end-to-side anterior interosseous to ulnar motor nerve transfer for intrinsic musculature reinnervation

Functional motor recovery after peripheral nerve injury is predominantly determined by the time to motor end plate reinnervation and the absolute number of regenerated motor axons that reach target. Experimental models have shown that axonal regeneration occurs across a supercharged end-to-side (SETS) nerve coaptation. In patients with a recovering proximal ulnar nerve injury, a SETS nerve transfer conceptually is useful to protect and preserve distal motor end plates until the native axons fully regenerate. In addition, for nerve injuries in which incomplete regeneration is anticipated, a SETS nerve transfer may be useful to augment the regenerating nerve with additional axons and to more quickly reinnervate target muscle. We describe our technique for a SETS nerve transfer of the terminal anterior interosseous nerve (AIN) to the pronator quadratus muscle (PQ) end-to-side to the deep motor fascicle of the ulnar nerve in the distal forearm. In addition, we describe our postoperative therapy regimen for these transfers and an evaluation tool for monitoring progressive muscle reinnervation. Although the AIN-to-ulnar motor group SETS nerve transfer was specifically designed for ulnar nerve injuries, we believe that the SETS procedure might have broad clinical utility for second- and third-degree axonotmetic nerve injuries, to augment partial recovery and/or "babysit" motor end plates until the native parent axons regenerate to target. We would consider all donor nerves currently utilized in end-to-end nerve transfers for neurotmetic injuries as candidates for this SETS technique.

Functional restoration of elbow flexion in brachial plexus injuries: results in 167 patients (excluding obstetric brachial plexus injury)

From 1985 to 1990, 167 patients were treated for impaired elbow flexion caused by brachial plexus injury. Surgical procedures were divided into two categories: nerve reconstruction (128 patients) and muscle or tendon transfers (39 patients). Surgery in the nerve reconstruction group included direct suturing, nerve grafting of portions of the brachial plexus responsible for elbow flexion, or nerve transfer (intercostal, phrenic, or spinal accessory nerve) to the musculocutaneous nerve. The second category included tendon or muscle transfer or a functioning free muscle transplantation for biceps replacement. Results were assessed by the Medical Research Council grading system and weight-lifting evaluation. Functional results revealed that nerve reconstruction was superior to muscle tendon transfers, direct suturing was superior to nerve grafting, short nerve grafts (< 10 cm) were superior to long nerve grafts (> 10 cm), infraclavicular plexus injuries did better than supraclavicular injuries, vascularized ulnar nerve grafts (if indicated) were superior to conventional long nerve grafts, ruptured plexus injuries recovered better than root avulsions. Intercostal nerve transfer to the musculocutaneous nerve has satisfactory results. In the muscle tendon transfer group, Steindler flexorplasty resulted in upgrading muscle strength from level one to level two. Functioning free muscle transplantation had results similar to the latissimus dorsi transfer.

Gracilis free muscle transfer for restoration of function after complete brachial plexus avulsion

Object

The authors report the functional outcomes after functioning free muscle transfer (FFMT) for restoration of the upper-extremity movement after brachial plexus injury (BPI).

Methods

The authors conducted a retrospective review of 36 gracilis FFMT procedures performed in 27 patients with BPI between 1990 and 2000. Eighteen patients underwent a single gracilis FFMT procedure for restoration of either elbow flexion (17 cases) or finger flexion (one case). Nine patients underwent a double free muscle transfer for simultaneous restoration of elbow flexion and wrist extension (first muscle) and finger flexion (second muscle), combined with direct triceps neurotization. The results obtained in 29 cases of FFMT in which the follow-up period was 1 year are reported.

Neurotization of the donor muscle was performed using the musculocutaneous nerve (one case), spinal accessory nerve (12 cases), or multiple intercostal motor nerves (16 cases). Two second-stage muscle flaps failed secondary to vascular insufficiency. Mean electromyography-measured reinnervation time was 5 months. At a minimum follow-up period of 1 year, five muscles achieved less than or equal to Grade M2, eight Grade M3, four Grade M4, and 12 Grade M5. Transfer for combined elbow flexion and wrist extension compared with elbow flexion alone lowered the overall results for elbow flexion strength. Seventy-nine percent of the FFMTs for elbow flexion alone (single transfer) and 63% of similarly innervated muscles transferred for combined motion achieved at least Grade M4 elbow flexion strength.

Conclusions

Functioning free muscle transfer is a viable reconstructive option for restoration of upper-extremity function in the setting of severe BPI. It is possible to achieve good to excellent outcomes in terms of muscle grades with the simultaneous reconstruction of two functions by one FFMT, making restoration of basic hand function possible. More reliable results are obtained when a single FFMT is performed for a single function.

Outcomes of surgical treatment of brachial plexus injuries using nerve grafting and nerve transfers

Between 1993 and 1998, 32 male patients with brachial plexus injuries were surgically treated. Eighteen interfascicular grafting and 71 extraplexal neurotization procedures were performed separately or in combination. Donor nerves were the intercostals, spinal accessory, phrenic, contralateral C7, and cervical plexus, in order of frequency. Patients were followed for a minimum of 24 (average, 35) months. Biceps function was best following grafting the musculocutaneous nerve itself, or neurotization with the phrenic nerve (100 percent grade 4), followed by neurotization with the intercostals (89.5 percent grade 3 or more) and last, grafting the C5 root or upper trunk (grade 3 in one of three patients). Phrenic to suprascapular neurotization produced the best results of shoulder abduction (40 to 90 degrees), followed by combined neurotization of the spinal accessory to suprascapular and phrenic to axillary (20 to 90 degrees). Sensory recovery over the lateral forearm and palm varied from S2 to S3+, according to the method of reconstruction.

Nerve transfers for severe brachial plexus injuries: a review

Nerve transfer procedures are increasingly performed for repair of severe brachial plexus injury (BPI), in which the proximal spinal nerve roots have been avulsed from the spinal cord. The procedure essentially involves the coaption of a proximal foreign nerve to the distal denervated nerve to reinnervate the latter by the donated axons. Cortical plasticity appears to play an important physiological role in the functional recovery of the reinnervated muscles. The author describes the general principles governing the successful use of nerve transfers. One major goal of this literature review is to provide a comprehensive survey on the numerous intra- and extraplexal nerves that have been used in transfer procedures to repair the brachial plexus. Thus, an emphasis on clinical outcomes is provided throughout. The second major goal is to discuss the role of candidate nerves for transfers in the surgical management of the common severe brachial plexus problems encountered clinically. It is hoped that this review will provide the treating surgeon with an updated list, indications, and expected outcomes involving nerve transfer operations for severe BPIs.

Surgical repair of brachial plexus injury: a multinational survey of experienced peripheral nerve surgeons

Object. Brachial plexus injuries (BPIs) are often devastating events that lead to upper-extremity paralysis, rendering the limb a painful extraneous appendage. Fortunately, there are several nerve repair techniques that provide restoration of some function. Although there is general agreement in the medical community concerning which patients may benefit from surgical intervention, the actual repair technique for a given lesion is less clear. The authors sought to identify and better define areas of agreement and disagreement among experienced peripheral nerve surgeons as to the management of BPIs.

Methods. The authors developed a detailed survey in two parts: one part addressing general issues related to BPI and the other presenting four clinical cases. The survey was mailed to 126 experienced peripheral nerve physicians and 49 (39%) participated in the study. The respondents represent 22 different countries and multiple surgical subspecialties. They performed a mean of 33 brachial plexus reconstructions annually. Areas of significant disagreement included the timing and indications for surgical intervention in birth-related palsy, treatment of neuroma-in-continuity, the best transfers to achieve elbow flexion and shoulder abduction, the use of intra- or extraplexal donors for motor neurotization, and the use of distal or proximal coaptation during nerve transfer.

Conclusions. Experienced peripheral nerve surgeons disagree in important ways as to the management of BPI. The decisions made by the various treating physicians underscore the many areas of disagreement regarding the treatment of BPI, including the diagnostic approach to defining the injury, timing of and indications for surgical intervention in birth-related palsy, the treatment of neuroma-in-continuity, the choice of nerve transfers to achieve elbow flexion and shoulder abduction, the use of intra- or extraplexal donors for neurotization, and the use of distal or proximal coaptation during nerve transfer.

Transfer of a single fascicle from the ulnar nerve to the biceps muscle after avulsions of upper roots of the brachial plexus

Thirty-six patients with avulsions of upper roots of the brachial plexus underwent transfer of a single fascicle from the ulnar nerve to the proximal motor branch of the biceps muscle to restore elbow flexion. The mean period of follow-up was 22 months. The average reinnervation time for the biceps muscle was 3.3 months. Thirty-four patients achieved biceps strength of Medical Research Council grade 3 or better. The operative results in the patients with C5, C6 avulsions were better than those with C5, C6, C7 avulsions. At the last follow-up examination, grip strength, pinch strength, moving two-point discrimination and the strength of flexion of the wrist on the affected side was not worse than before surgery in any patient.