Cost minimization analysis of two treatment regimens for low-risk rhabdomyosarcoma in children: a report from the Children's Oncology Group

BACKGROUND

Recent Children's Oncology Group trials for low-risk rhabdomyosarcoma attempted to reduce therapy while maintaining excellent outcomes. D9602 delivered 45 weeks of outpatient vincristine and dactinomycin (VA) for patients in Subgroup A. ARST0331 reduced the duration of therapy to 22 weeks but added four doses of cyclophosphamide to VA for patients in Subset 1. Failure-free survival was similar. We undertook a cost minimization comparison to help guide future decision-making.

PROCEDURE

Addressing the costs of treatment from the healthcare perspective we modeled a simple decision-analytic model from aggregate clinical trial data. Medical care inputs and probabilities were estimated from trial reports and focused chart review. Costs of radiation, surgery and off-therapy surveillance were excluded. Unit costs were obtained from literature and national reimbursement and inpatient utilization databases and converted to 2012 US dollars. Model uncertainty was assessed with first-order sensitivity analysis.

RESULTS

Direct medical costs were $46,393 for D9602 and $43,261 for ARST0331 respectively, making ARST0331 the less costly strategy. Dactinomycin contributed the most to D9602 total costs but varied with age (42-69%). Chemotherapy administration costs accounted for the largest proportion of ARST0331 total costs (39-57%). ARST0331 incurred fewer costs than D9602 under most alternative distributive models and alternative clinical practice assumptions.

CONCLUSIONS

Cost analysis suggests that ARST0331 may incur fewer costs than D9602 from the healthcare system's perspective. Attention to the services driving the costs provides directions for future efficiency improvements. Future studies should prospectively consider the patient and family's perspective.

Treatment for childhood rhabdomyosarcoma: the cost of cure

Survival of children and young people with rhabdomyosarcoma has improved substantially during the past 30 years. The improvement can be attributed to the introduction of coordinated multimodality therapy through the efforts of collaborative clinical-trial groups in the USA and Europe. As survival has improved, important late sequelae of treatment have been characterised, and many relate to the local therapy used. Efforts have since been made by some groups to explore ways in which local treatment, particularly radiotherapy, can be omitted for some patients in an attempt to reduce the risk of late sequelae without compromising prospects for cure. An important issue is the overall cost of cure in relation to the treatment received and the need for better selection of patients most likely to benefit from this approach to therapy.