High-resolution light microscopic characterization of spermatogonia

It is possible to distinguish the morphological features of the spermatogonial nuclei and nucleoli and to further identify their distinct generations using an appropriate method to fix whole testes via vascular perfusion with glutaraldehyde, postfixation by immersion in reduced osmium, embedding in araldite, and staining of semithin tissue sections. A well-trained individual can distinguish each of the spermatogonial types in rodents (A(undiferentiated), A(1), A(2), A(3), A(4), In, and B) using this tissue preparation technique based on their morphological details and without correlation with the stages of the epithelium cycle or other parameters. The possibility of distinguishing each spermatogonial type by their morphological characteristics allows a more accurate evaluation of their kinetics during the spermatogenic cycle. Moreover, the understanding of spermatogonial behavior is a means to elucidate the functional control of the spermatogenesis, which consequently allows the determination of their effects on the fertility of humans and other animals.

Identification and characterization of spermatogonial subtypes and their expansion in whole mounts and tissue sections from primate testes

The different types of spermatogonia present in the testes of all mammalian species have a series of functions in the adult testis. Some cycle regularly to (1) maintain the spermatogonial population and (2) derive differentiating germ cells to maintain continuous spermatogenesis; other spermatogonia act as a functional reserve, proliferating only very rarely under healthy conditions but repopulating the depleted seminiferous tubules after gonadotoxic insult. The number, appearance, and function of different types of spermatogonia differ greatly between mammalian species, and therefore the precise number of mitotic steps and the number of identifiable stages in spermatogenesis, the sperma-togenic efficiency, and the histological appearance of the seminiferous epithelium show remarkable variation. To characterize spermatogonial phenotypes and their respective functions and to understand the kinetics of spermatogenesis in any given species, a series of methods can be combined for best results. Conventional (hema-toxylin or Periodic acid Schiff's reagent PAS/hematoxylin) staining on sections allows histological identification of the different types of spermatogonia and stages of spermatogenesis in the tissue. Immunohistochemical detection of the proliferation marker bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) in sections and whole mounts of seminiferous tubules allows determination of which types of spermatogonia proliferate in which stage of spermatogenesis and determine the sizes of clones of proliferation spermatogonia in each stage. Combined, these methods allow the best possible characterization of spermatogenesis in any given mammalian species.

Spermatogonial stem cells: questions, models and perspectives

This review looks into the phylogeny of spermatogonial stem cells and describes their basic biological features. We are focusing on species-specific differences of spermatogonial stem cell physiology. We propose revised models for the clonal expansion of spermatogonia and for the potential existence of true stem cells and progenitors in primates but not in rodents. We create a new model for the species-specific arrangements of spermatogenic stages which may depend on the variable clonal expansion patterns. We also provide a brief overview of germ cell transplantation as a powerful tool for basic research and its potential use in a clinical setting.

High-resolution light microscopic characterization of mouse spermatogonia

Characteristics of spermatogonia were determined in the C57BL/6J strain mouse using high-resolution light microscopy of plastic-embedded tissues and identifying cells during stages of the spermatogenic cycle. The frequency of expecting each spermatogonial cell type was a major factor in identifying and categorizing various cell types. Although numerous characteristics were described, several major differences were noted in spermatogonial cell types. The group comprising A(s), A(pr), and A(al) spermatogonia could be differentiated based primarily on mottling of heterochromatin throughout the nucleus in the absence of heterochromatin lining the nuclear envelope. The A(1) cells displayed finely granular chromatin throughout the nucleus and virtually no flakes of heterochromatin along the nuclear membrane. The A(2) through A(4) spermatogonia contained progressively more heterochromatin rimming the nucleus. Intermediate-type spermatogonia displayed flaky or shallow heterochromatin that completely rimmed the nucleus. Type B spermatogonia showed rounded heterochromatin periodically along the nuclear envelope. Use of gray-scale histograms allowed objective quantification of nuclear characteristics and showed a logical shift in the gray scale to a narrower and darker profile, from four cell types leading to A(1) cells. The ability to differentiate spermatogonial types is a prerequisite to studying the behavior and kinetics of the earliest of the germ cell types in both normal and abnormal spermatogenesis.

Distribution of type A spermatogonia in the mouse is not random

The distribution of type A spermatogonia was studied using drawings of cross-sectioned tubules at various stages of the spermatogenic cycle of perfusion-fixed, epoxy-embedded mouse testis. Spermatogonia were classified as either positioned opposite the interstitium or opposite the region where two tubules make contact or in a defined, intermediate region at which the two tubules diverged. At stage V, the population of type A spermatogonia, comprised of A(s) through A(al) cells, is randomly positioned around the periphery of the seminiferous tubule. The A(s) through A(al) population becomes nonrandomly distributed beginning at stage VI, being located primarily in regions where the tubule opposes the interstitium, and remains nonrandom through stage III of the next cycle. The A(1) spermatogonia of stage VII, derived from most A(pr) and A(al) spermatogonia, and the A(2) spermatogonia of stage IX, derived from the A(1) spermatogonia, are also nonrandomly positioned opposing the interstitium. However, the A(3) population of stage XI becomes randomly distributed around the tubule. To our knowledge, these are the first data to show that the more primitive spermatogonial types (A(s) to A(al)) move to specific sites within the seminiferous tubule. Division of the regularly spaced, more primitive spermatogonia (A(s) to A(al)) leads to the spread of their progeny (A(1) to A(4)) laterally along the base of the seminiferous tubule. The lateral spread from more or less evenly spaced foci ensures that spermatogenesis is conducted uniformly around the entire tubule. The data also suggest that the position of a seminiferous tubule in the mouse is stabilized in relationship to other seminiferous tubules.

Impairment of spermatogonial development and spermiation after testosterone-induced gonadotropin suppression in adult monkeys (Macaca fascicularis)

Human male hormonal contraceptive regimens do not consistently induce azoospermia, and the basis of this variable response is unclear. This study used nine adult macaque monkeys (Macaca fascicularis) given testosterone (T) implants for 20 weeks to study changes in germ cell populations in relation to sperm output. Germ cell numbers were determined using the optical disector stereological method. Four animals achieved consistent azoospermia (azoo group), whereas five animals did not (nonazoo group). T-induced gonadotropin suppression in all animals decreased A pale (Ap) spermatogonia to 45% of baseline within 2 weeks, leading to decreased B spermatogonia (32--38%) and later germ cells (20--30%) after 14 and 20 weeks. Though the reduction in later germ cell types could be primarily attributed to the loss of spermatogonia, the data suggested that some cells were lost during the spermatocyte and spermatid phase of development. B spermatogonial number was more markedly suppressed in azoospermic animals, compared with the nonazoo group, as was the conversion ratio between Ap and B spermatogonia. Abnormal retention of elongated spermatids (failed spermiation) was also prominent in some animals after long-term T administration. We conclude that: 1) the variable suppression of sperm output is attributed to the degree of inhibition of germ cell development from type B spermatogonia onwards, and this is related to the degree of FSH suppression; and 2) inhibition of Ap and B spermatogonial development and of spermiation are the major defects caused by long-term T administration to monkeys.