The efficacy and safety of endoscopic sphincterotomy in patients with Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (SOD) has been used to describe patients with RUQ abdominal pain without an etiology. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ES (endoscopic sphincterotomy) for SOD.

METHODS

The study methodology follows the PRISMA guidelines. A comprehensive search was conducted using MEDLINE and EMBASE databases for RCTs with ES in patients with SOD. The primary outcome assessed was the improvement of abdominal pain after ES/sham. A random effects model was used to calculate pooled estimates for each outcome of interest.

RESULTS

Of the initial 55 studies, 23 were screened and thoroughly reviewed. The final analysis included 3 studies. 340 patients (89.7% women) with SOD were included. All patients had a cholecystectomy. Most included patients had SOD type II and III. The pooled rate of technical success of ERCP was 100%. The average clinical success rate was 50%. The pooled cumulative rate of overall AEs related to all ERCP procedures was 14.6%. In the sensitivity analysis, only one study significantly affected the outcome or the heterogeneity.

CONCLUSION

ES appears no better than placebo in patients with SOD type III. Sphincterotomy could be considered in patients with SOD type II and elevated SO basal pressure.

ENDOSCOPIC METHODS OF DIAGNOSTICS AND TREATMENT OF PAPILLOSTENOSIS

Differential diagnostics of papillospasm and papillostenosis should be based on the complex of clinical and instrumental researches with the priority to endoscopic technologies. Conservative therapy should be considered as optimal option of treatment for the patients with papillospasm. Preference of endoscopic operations have to be in case of revealed papillostenosis of different degree. Similar differentiated diagnostics and treatment management justified in 90% of cases and led to improvement of patient’s conditions and their recovery.

[DIFFERENTIAL MANAGEMENT AT THE SPHINCTER OF ODDI DYSFUNCTION AFTER CHOLECYSTECTOMY]

AIM

Develop a differential management at the patients with suspected sphincter of Oddi dysfunction after cholecystectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

169 patients after cholecystectomy, divided into 2 groups. 1st group - 60 patients after repeated surgery formed as a comparison group. They multivariate analysis of clinical, laboratory and ultrasonic data revealed the most significant signs of organic causes of cholestasis, expressed in scores. 2nd group - 109 patients with a suspected sphincter of Oddi dysfunction, who did not have symptoms of organic pathology. Types of bile outflow were assessed by hepatobiliary scintigraphy (GBSG). In cases of doubtful diagnoses computer tomography, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography, and/or retrograde cholangiopancreatography are performed.

RESULTS

According to the scoring system, patients 1st group scored 4 or more (8,7 ± 3,87) points. GBSG performed only in 7 (11.6%) patients, and in all cases the cholestatic type of bile outflow was detected. The amount of estimated points in the 2nd group was 2-3 points (2,43 ± 0,34; p < 0.05). GBSG performed in all patients and three types of bile outflow were revealed: normal - in 21 (19.2%) patients, cholestatic in 8 (7.3%), and accelerated - in 80 (73.3%) patients. When refining the diagnosis in 10 (9%) patients had hidden organic disorders of bile outflow, served as an indication for surgery.

CONCLUSION

Scoring system for the assessment of the suspected sphincter of Oddi dysfunction allows to differentiate of patients for invasive research and surgery. In our study group of 109 patients received less than 4 points, they have dominated the functional disorders, but the results of a detailed examination, 9% of patients had latent organic changes that have become indications for surgical treatment.

[Diagnosis of sphincter of Oddi dysfunction in patients with postcholecystectomy syndrome from hepatobiliary scintigraphic findings]

OBJECTIVE

to diagnose and estimate the clinical value of postcholecystectomy sphincter of Oddi dysfunction in patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Examinations were made in 100 postcholecystectomy patients without signs of cholestasis; of them 14 postpapillotomy patients formed a comparison group. Hepatobiliary scintigraphy using the radiotracer 99mTC-bromeside was performed for 90 minutes with cholagogue breakfast at 45 minutes. Common bile duct and duodenal functions and duodenogastric reflux (DGR) were evaluated comparing them with clinical, laboratory, and instrumental findings.

RESULTS

Two patient groups were identified according to bile outflow changes. In Group I consisting of 20 (23.2%) patients, the time of maximum accumulation (Tmax) of the radiopharmaceutical in the projection of the choledochus coincided with that in the cholagogue test (46.0 1.8 min) and in Group 2 including 66 (76.8%) patients that was shorter than in the cholagogue test (32.9 +/- 6.8 min) (p<0.05). In Group 2, Tmax was similar to that in the comparison group (30.9 +/- 7.5 min; p > 0.05) and there was no significant difference in intestinal imaging time (18.6 +/- 6.0 min versus 17.6 +/- 0.8) either, which could be indicative of sphincter of Oddi dysfunction. Diarrhea was observed in 73% of the patients with sphincter of Oddi dysfunction and in 86% of the patients in the comparison group versus 10% of the patients with normal bile passage (p<0.01). Statistical data processing showed a correlation of the indicators of sphincter of Oddi dysfunction with those of duodenal evacuator function (r = 0.57; p < 0.0005) and DGR (r = 0.74; p < 0.009).

CONCLUSION

Postcholecystectomy sphincter of Oddi dysfunction assumes the greatest clinical value in patients with duodenal motor-evacuator dysfunction, which should be hepatobiliamy scintigraphic, kept in mind when choossphincter of Oddi dysfunction ing a treatment policy.

Postoperative biliary adverse events following orthotopic liver transplantation: Assessment with magnetic resonance cholangiography

Biliary adverse events following orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) are relatively common and continue to be serious causes of morbidity, mortality, and transplant dysfunction or failure. The development of these adverse events is heavily influenced by the type of anastomosis during surgery. The low specificity of clinical and biologic findings makes the diagnosis challenging. Moreover, direct cholangiographic procedures such as endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography present an inadmissible rate of adverse events to be utilized in clinically low suspected patients. Magnetic resonance (MR) maging with MR cholangiopancreatography is crucial in assessing abnormalities in the biliary system after liver surgery, including liver transplant. MR cholangiopancreatography is a safe, rapid, non-invasive, and effective diagnostic procedure for the evaluation of biliary adverse events after liver transplantation, since it plays an increasingly important role in the diagnosis and management of these events. On the basis of a recent systematic review of the literature the summary estimates of sensitivity and specificity of MR cholangiopancreatography for diagnosis of biliary adverse events following OLT were 0.95 and 0.92, respectively. It can provide a non-invasive method of imaging surgical reconstruction of the biliary anastomoses as well as adverse events including anastomotic and non-anastomotic strictures, biliary lithiasis and sphincter of Oddi dysfunction in liver transplant recipients. Nevertheless, conventional T2-weighted MR cholangiography can be implemented with T1-weighted contrast-enhanced MR cholangiography using hepatobiliary contrast agents (in particular using Gd-EOB-DTPA) in order to improve the diagnostic accuracy in the adverse events’ detection such as bile leakage and strictures, especially in selected patients with biliary-enteric anastomosis.

Effect of endoscopic sphincterotomy for suspected sphincter of Oddi dysfunction on pain-related disability following cholecystectomy: the EPISOD randomized clinical trial

IMPORTANCE

Abdominal pain after cholecystectomy is common and may be attributed to sphincter of Oddi dysfunction. Management often involves endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with manometry and sphincterotomy.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether endoscopic sphincterotomy reduces pain and whether sphincter manometric pressure is predictive of pain relief.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS

Multicenter, sham-controlled, randomized trial involving 214 patients with pain after cholecystectomy without significant abnormalities on imaging or laboratory studies, and no prior sphincter treatment or pancreatitis randomly assigned (August 6, 2008-March 23, 2012) to undergo sphincterotomy or sham therapy at 7 referral medical centers. One-year follow-up was blinded. The final follow-up visit was March 21, 2013.

INTERVENTIONS

After ERCP, patients were randomized 2:1 to sphincterotomy (n = 141) or sham (n = 73) irrespective of manometry findings. Those randomized to sphincterotomy with elevated pancreatic sphincter pressures were randomized again (1:1) to biliary or to both biliary and pancreatic sphincterotomies. Seventy-two were entered into an observational study with conventional ERCP managemeny.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Success of treatment was defined as less than 6 days of disability due to pain in the prior 90 days both at months 9 and 12 after randomization, with no narcotic use and no further sphincter intervention.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients (37%; 95% CI, 25.9%-48.1%) in the sham treatment group vs 32 (23%; 95% CI, 15.8%-29.6%) in the sphincterotomy group experienced successful treatment (adjusted risk difference, -15.6%; 95% CI, -28.0% to -3.3%; P = .01). Of the patients with pancreatic sphincter hypertension, 14 (30%; 95% CI, 16.7%-42.9%) who underwent dual sphincterotomy and 10 (20%; 95% CI, 8.7%-30.5%) who underwent biliary sphincterotomy alone experienced successful treatment. Thirty-seven treated patients (26%; 95% CI,19%-34%) and 25 patients (34%; 95% CI, 23%-45%) in the sham group underwent repeat ERCP interventions (P = .22). Manometry results were not associated with the outcome. No clinical subgroups appeared to benefit from sphincterotomy more than others. Pancreatitis occurred in 15 patients (11%) after primary sphincterotomies and in 11 patients (15%) in the sham group. Of the nonrandomized patients in the observational study group, 5 (24%; 95% CI, 6%-42%) who underwent biliary sphincterotomy, 12 (31%; 95% CI, 16%-45%) who underwent dual sphincterotomy, and 2 (17%; 95% CI, 0%-38%) who did not undergo sphincterotomy had successful treatment.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In patients with abdominal pain after cholecystectomy undergoing ERCP with manometry, sphincterotomy vs sham did not reduce disability due to pain. These findings do not support ERCP and sphincterotomy for these patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00688662.

Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction

Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (SOD) is a poorly-understood disorder, typically presenting as postcholecystectomy, "biliary-type," right-sided abdominal and/or chest wall pain. Most patients referred to specialist clinics for work-up of presumed SOD do not, in fact, have anything wrong with their bile ducts or biliary sphincter mechanisms. A careful history and focused physical examination will often identify the true source of the pain syndrome, ranging from chest wall costochondritis and nerve injury at surgical trochar sites, to gastroparesis and visceral hypersensitivity ("irritable bowel"). The Rome III classification of functional gallbladder and biliary disorders defines SOD as episodic (not daily) pain lasting more than 30 min, which is disruptive of normal activities and not associated with bowel upset. It is not relieved by gastric acid suppression or antispasmodics. Other causes of abdominal pain must be excluded. Standard work-up includes endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with biliary manometry, which risks post-ERCP pancreatitis, especially in young women with normal bile ducts and liver serology. Noninvasive tests for SOD, such as timed ("gated") cholecystokinin (CCK)-stimulated hepatobiliary iminodiacetic acid (HIDA) scans and secretin-stimulated magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography, are imperfect and still evolving. Although many doubt the very existence of SOD, a multidisciplinary approach to the management of pre- and postcholecystectomy abdominal pain syndromes is long overdue.

Opium addiction as a new risk factor of sphincter of Oddi dysfunction

BACKGROUND

Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (SOD) refers to an abnormality of SO contractility. It is a benign, non-calculus obstruction to the flow of bile or pancreatic juice through the pancreaticobiliary junction. Although morphine can cause an excitatory effect on SO motility, there are no comprehensive data about opium as a risk factor in inducing SOD in chronic opium abusers. The aim of the study was to assess potential risk factors, especially opium addiction (OA), in patients with SOD.

MATERIAL/METHODS

In a case-control study, opium addiction, cigarette smoking, cholecystectomy, and periampullary diverticulum in patients with SOD were recorded and compared with healthy subjects. SOD was diagnosed by the Geenen-Hogan classification (type I).

RESULTS

OA (p=0.001) and cholecystectomy (p<0.001) were two independent risk factors in patients with SOD.

CONCLUSIONS

Chronic use of opiates by the oral or inhalational route may induce SOD, but whether chronic use of other morphine derivatives or i.v. drug abuse induce this disorder is not clear and needs further evaluation.

Health-related quality of life, somatization, and abuse in Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction

BACKGROUND

Most of the focus on patients with Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (SOD) has centered on endoscopic management, and thus little is known about quality of life in these patients.

AIMS

We sought to determine what health-related quality of life components are troublesome to patients with SOD and compare to patients with recurrent pancreatitis.

METHODS

Using the Brief Symptom Inventory and the SF-12 version 1, as well as proprietary questionnaires, we measured health-related quality of life in patients with biliary SOD and patients with recurrent idiopathic pancreatitis who underwent sphincter of Oddi manometry.

RESULTS

Both groups had significantly worse quality of life than nonpatients and both groups somatized. Abuse histories were surprisingly common and similar between both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Health-related quality of life is impaired and abuse histories are common in SOD patients, and similar to patients with recurrent idiopathic pancreatitis. Whether these characteristics are predictors of healthcare seeking remains to be determined.

Management of biliary complications following orthotopic liver transplantation

Biliary complications are a major cause of morbidity following orthotopic liver transplantation with an overall incidence between 11% and 25%. The most common complications are biliary leaks, strictures, and stones. These complications have an impact on graft survival, length of hospital stay, recovery, and overall cost of care. Therefore, knowledge of these complications and their management is important to the practicing gastroenterologist. Historically, biliary complications after liver transplantation have been managed surgically. However, with the growth of therapeutic endoscopic and percutaneous radiologic methods, most of these complications can now be managed less invasively. This article focuses on the incidence, timing, mechanism, and endoscopic management of biliary leak, strictures, stones, sludge, casts, and sphincter of Oddi dysfunction following liver transplantation.

Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction: managing the patient with chronic biliary pain

Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (SOD) is a syndrome of chronic biliary pain or recurrent pancreatitis due to functional obstruction of pancreaticobiliary flow at the level of the sphincter of Oddi. The Milwaukee classification stratifies patients according to their clinical picture based on elevated liver enzymes, dilated common bile duct and presence of abdominal pain. Type I patients have pain as well as abnormal liver enzymes and a dilated common bile duct. Type II SOD consists of pain and only one objective finding, and Type III consists of biliary pain only. This classification is useful to guide diagnosis and management of sphincter of Oddi dysfunction. The current gold standard for diagnosis is manometry to detect elevated sphincter pressure, which correlates with outcome to sphincterotomy. However, manometry is not widely available and is an invasive procedure with a risk of pancreatitis. Non-invasive testing methods, including fatty meal ultrasonography and scintigraphy, have shown limited correlation with manometric findings but may be useful in predicting outcome to sphincterotomy. Endoscopic injection of botulinum toxin appears to predict subsequent outcome to sphincterotomy, and could be useful in selection of patients for therapy, especially in the setting where manometry is unavailable.

The underestimated role of opiates in patients with suspected sphincter of Oddi dysfunction after cholecystectomy

AIMS

Pain recurrence after cholecystectomy is often attributed to sphincter of Oddi dysfunction, whose diagnostic criteria and treatments remain uncertain. We performed a retrospective study to assess the possible precipitating role of opiate ingestion in this setting.

METHODS

The retrospective study of the files of 147 consecutive patients investigated for post-cholecystectomy syndrome by endoscopic ultrasonography and/or endoscopic retrograde cholangiography yielded 37 cases of suspected biliary-type sphincter of Oddi dysfunction.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients (30%) with suspected sphincter of Oddi dysfunction had taken opiate-containing drugs 15 minutes to two hours (median 1 hr) before the onset of pain ("Opiate group"). When compared with the 23 patients having not taken opiates ("Non Opiate Group"), they were significantly younger (47 vs. 60 yrs), had a narrower common bile duct (5.0 vs. 7.7 mm), but had similar biochemical abnormalities and belonged to the same Milwaukee's classes, mainly class II. None of the patients in the "Opiate group" were submitted to retrograde cholangiography or endoscopic sphincterotomy vs. 52% and 39%, respectively of the patients of the "Non-Opiate Group". After a mean follow-up of 3.5 years, there were three recurrences of biliary-type pain (1 choledochal stone, and 2 suspected sphincter of Oddi dysfunction) in the "Opiate Group", and 2 (1 choledochal stone, 1 after codeine intake) in the "Non-Opiate Group".

CONCLUSIONS

Opiate intake is a frequent cause of suspicion of sphincter of Oddi dysfunction after cholecystectomy, especially in young patients with a narrow common bile duct. A careful history taking is essential to avoid unnecessary and potentially harmful procedures.

Novel use of a T-tube access to perform an internal/external biliary drainage

We report a case of post-surgical temporary functional stenosis of the sphincter of Oddi and biliary leak in a patient with a previous Billroth II reconstruction who had undergone cholecystectomy, surgical choledochotomy and sphincterotomy for biliary calculi. The patient was treated by creation of an internal/external biliary drainage using the T-tube access with an unreported technique.

[Biliary tract in patients with chronic viral hepatitides]

AIM

To characterize motor-kinetic and inflammatory changes in extrahepatic biliary tracts and gallbladder in patients with chronic viral hepatitis (CVH). To ascertain whether there is a pathogenetic correlation between affection of the biliary system and viral infection.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The condition of the biliary tract was examined in 183 patients with CVH using fractionated duodenal tubing with biochemical tests and bacteriological investigation of bile, dynamic ultrasonic investigation.

RESULTS

69.9% patients were diagnosed to have dysfunction of the Oddi's sphyncter caused by its hypertonicity, 4.4% patients had hypotonic sphyncter. Hyper- and hypotonicity of the gallbladder were observed in 45.8 and 20.8% patients, respectively. Biliary dysfunction was associated with the process activity but not with a nosological form of the disease. Chronic acalculous cholecystitis was verified in 21.2% patients.

CONCLUSION

Chronic HBV and HCV infections are accompanied with biliary dysfunctions associated with activity of inflammation in the liver. Oddi's sphincter dysfunction in CVH is a risk factor of gallbladder inflammation.