Massive pelvic hemorrhage during gynecologic cancer surgery: "pack and go back"

Over a 13-year period, intraabdominal packing has been used to control massive hemorrhage during surgery for gynecologic malignancy in six patients. Five patients had undergone total pelvic exenteration and one total abdominal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy for endometrial cancer. Massive hemorrhage was defined as infusion of more than 10 units of blood and replacement of more than one total blood volume. Tamponade was performed using continuous Kerlex rolls (Kendall Co., Boston, MA) in a bowel bag with directed pressure over the hemorrhaging site with abdominal closure. The packs were removed in 48 to 72 hr in the operating room, transabdominally in five patients and transvaginally in one. One postoperative death occurred within 8 hr of surgery. The packing was ultimately successful in the five remaining patients. In five of six patients, tumors were removed before the packing, whereas in one, the tumor was removed concurrently with the pack. In one patient, immediate repacking was required after pack removal, with ultimate hemostasis. Morbidity included "empty pelvis syndrome" in four patients, neuropathy in three (obturator in 1, sciatic in 2), and small bowel obstruction in one. In patients with severe intraoperative hemorrhage, intraabdominal packing has been successful as a mode of treatment.

A new intravaginal device for stress incontinence in women

OBJECTIVE

To compare two versions of the same type of disposable intravaginal device (the Conveen Continence Guard, CCG, and the Contrelle Continence Tampon, CCT, Coloplast a/s, Humlebaek, Denmark) for treating stress incontinence in women.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Women with the predominant symptom of stress incontinence were recruited from four centres in Denmark, Australia and the UK. The women were assessed using a 24-h pad-test, uroflowmetry, postvoid residual urine volume and a voiding diary before treatment, and after 5 weeks using each of the two devices. Vaginal swabs and specimens of urine were sent for culture, and a questionnaire about the subjective effect and adverse events completed at each visit. In all, 94 women were recruited, of whom 62 (66%) completed the study.

RESULTS

Both devices reduced the amount of leakage significantly, but the CCT reduced urine loss significantly more than the CCG. Uroflowmetry values and residual urine volume were unchanged when using the two devices. Vaginal culture showed no abnormality during the study period, and only one woman was treated for a urinary tract infection. Side-effects were few and not serious. The women found both devices easy to prepare, insert and use; two-thirds preferred the CCT to the CCG.

CONCLUSION

The new intravaginal device (CCT) is more effective for treating stress incontinence than the currently available version (CCG), and patient acceptability of the new device seems to be superior.

Tampon absorbency, composition and oxygen content and risk of toxic shock syndrome

Tampon use has been identified as a major risk factor for toxic shock syndrome, although the etiologic role of tampons is not clearly understood. Two epidemiologic studies conducted to date have reported an association between tampon absorbency and risk of toxic shock syndrome. This finding is not corroborated by laboratory studies, however, which have suggested that absorbency may be a marker for other characteristics that create an environment conductive to the elaboration of toxic shock syndrome toxin 1. We used data from the previously reported Tri-state study to estimate simultaneously the effects of tampon oxygen content, absorbency and chemical composition. Although the data are sparse, oxygen content was more strongly associated with risk of toxic shock syndrome than either absorbency or chemical composition. The results suggest that it may be possible to develop a highly absorbent tampon that is not associated with a high risk of toxic shock syndrome.

Managing faecal incontinence or leakage: the Peristeen Anal Plug

Incontinence can be a devastating problem to many individuals. It is embarrassing and limiting socially, and prevents those with the problem from going about their day-to-day activities. People adopt coping strategies to manage the problem and those with urinary incontinence often look for containment products such as disposable pads or nappy-style products. These products have been developed using different absorbent materials and are accessible to sufferers in local supermarkets. Absorbency of the products has improved so that once wetted, they hold urine more easily. However, the same cannot be said for faecal incontinence management products and there are few that can be called upon to manage this devastating condition. The Peristeen Anal Plug, developed originally as the Conveen Anal Plug, stands alone in the search for a device to manage faecal incontinence or leakage.