Contemporary full-mouth rehabilitation using a digital smile design in combination with conventional and computer-aided design/manufacturing restorative materials in a patient with bruxism: A case report

RATIONALE

Full-mouth rehabilitation of patients with bruxism and severely worn dentition poses a great challenge to clinicians. Several treatment planning methods and restorative materials are used to treat tooth wear in modern dentistry. Clinicians should be able to select the most suitable treatment planning methods and materials for individual patients depending on their specific situation.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 47-year-old male was referred for evaluation of a severely worn dentition.

DIAGNOSES

Clinical and radiographic evaluation revealed tooth wear in the entire dentition. The interocclusal distance at rest was 4 mm, and the patient had a parafunctional habit of bruxism.

INTERVENTIONS

A digital smile design was used to formulate a treatment plan. Full-mouth rehabilitation was performed using a combination of conventional and digital materials and methods.

OUTCOMES

The full-mouth restoration showed satisfactory functions and esthetics. No complications were observed in the restorations, supporting tissues, and temporomandibular joints during 2-year follow-up.

LESSONS

In clinical practice, it is important to determine the optimal combination of the available methods for treatment planning. This case report details the formulation of a unique treatment plan for the dental rehabilitation of a severely worn out dentition, which is considered challenging due to the limitations imposed by biological tissues and restorative materials. The use of conventional and digital tools for treatment planning, patient education, and treatment execution was demonstrated.

Staged Reconstruction for a Severely Worn Dentition

When patients are constrained financially to receive dental work, a staged approach can be an effective way for enabling treatment to proceed. In this case, a patient who had been in the practice for about 10 years and had a severely worn and eroded dentition finally opted to receive treatment in stages. A systematic approach was used to determine the proper postoperative position of the teeth. The subsequent treatment plan included the use of porcelain onlays and full-coverage crowns in the mandibular posterior along with provisional direct composite restorations in the maxillary dentition; the composites would be transitioned to porcelain crowns as the patient's finances would allow.

Surgical treatment of single gingival recessions: clinical guidelines

PURPOSE

The purpose of this clinical guidelines project was to determine the most appropriate surgical techniques, in terms of efficacy, complications, and patient opinions, for the treatment of buccal single gingival recessions without loss of interproximal soft and hard tissues.

METHODS

Literature searches were performed (electronically and manually) for entries up to 28 February, 2013 concerning the surgical approaches for the treatment of gingival recessions. Systematic reviews (SRs) of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and individual RCTs that reported at least 6 months of follow-up of surgical treatment of single gingival recessions were included. The full texts of the selected SRs and RCTs were analysed using checklists for qualitative evaluation according to the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) method. The following variables were evaluated: Complete Root Coverage (CRC); Recession Reduction (RecRed); complications; functional and aesthetic satisfaction of the patients; and costs of therapies.

RESULTS

Out of 30 systematic reviews, 3 SRs and 16 out of 313 RCTs were judged to have a low risk for bias (SIGN code: 1+). At a short-term evaluation, the coronally advanced flap plus connective tissue graft method (CAF+CTG) resulted in the best treatment in terms of CRC and/or RecRed; in case of cervical abrasion and presence of root sensitivity CAF + CTG + Restoration caused less sensitivity than CAF+CTG. CAF produced less postoperative discomfort for patients. Limited information is available regarding postoperative dental hypersensitivity and aesthetic satisfaction of the patients.

CONCLUSION

In presence of aesthetic demands or tooth hypersensitivity, the best way to surgically treat single gingival recessions without loss of interproximal tissues is achieved using the CAF procedure associated with CTG. Considering postoperative discomfort, the CAF procedure is the less painful surgical approach, while the level of aesthetic satisfaction resulted higher after CAF either alone or with CTG. It is unclear how much tooth hypersensitivity is reduced by surgically covering buccal recessions. It is important to note that the present recommendations are based on short-term data (less than 1 year).

SOURCE OF FUNDING

The guidelines project was made possible through self-financing by the authors.