The evolving management of venous bullet emboli: a case series and literature review

Bullet emboli are an infrequent and unique complication of penetrating trauma. Complications of venous and arterial bullet emboli can be devastating and commonly include limb-threatening ischaemia,pulmonary embolism, cardiac valvular incompetence, and cerebrovascular accidents. Bullets from penetrating wounds can gain access to the venous circulation and embolise to nearly every large vascular bed. Venous emboli are often occult phenomenon and may remain unrecognised until migration leads to vascular injury or flow obstruction with resultant oedema. The majority of arterial emboli present early with end-organ or limb ischaemia. We describe four separate cases involving venous bullet embolism and the subsequent management of each case. Review of the literature focusing on the reported management of these injuries, comparison of techniques of management, as well as the evolving role of endovascular techniques in the management of bullet emboli is provided.

Incidence and predictors for the need for fasciotomy after extremity trauma: a 10-year review in a mature level I trauma centre

BACKGROUND

Compartment syndrome is a devastating complication after trauma to the extremities. Prompt fasciotomy is essential for avoiding disability and limb loss. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence and predictors for the need for fasciotomy after extremity trauma.

METHODS

All trauma patients sustaining extremity injuries admitted to the LAC+USC Medical Centre during a 10-year period ending in December 2007 were identified. Demographics, clinical data, blood requirements and outcomes were abstracted. Patients who required an extremity fasciotomy were compared with those who did not. Stepwise logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent predictors of the need for fasciotomy.

RESULTS

During the study period, 288 (2.8%) of a total of 10,315 patients who sustained extremity trauma required a fasciotomy. Despite a stable ISS and extremity AIS over the study period, fasciotomy rates decreased significantly from 3.2% in 1998 to 2.5% in 2002 to 0.7% in 2007 (p<0.001). The need for fasciotomy varied widely by mechanism of injury (from 0.9% after motor vehicle accident to 8.6% in GSWs, p<0.001) and by type of injury (from 2.2% in closed fracture to 41.8% in combined vascular injury, p<0.001). Patients requiring fasciotomy were predominantly male (90.6% vs. 73.5%, p<0.001) and had higher ISS (14.5±9.7 vs. 12.8±10.6, p=0.006). Patients requiring fasciotomy received significantly more units of PRBCs (8.2±13.9 vs. 1.8±5.1, p<0.001) during their hospital stay. Patients requiring fasciotomy were more likely to sustain open fractures (upper: 8.3% vs. 5.2%, p=0.031 and lower: 28.5% vs. 11.8%, p<0.001); joint dislocations (elbow: 25.0% vs. 8.3%, p=0.005, and knee: 31.2% vs. 6.5%, p<0.001) and brachial (8.0% vs. 1.1%, p<0.001), femoral (20.1% vs. 1.1%, p<0.001) and popliteal vessel injuries (15.3% vs. 0.4%, p<0.001). A stepwise logistic regression identified the presence of vascular injury, need for PRBC transfusion, male gender, open fracture, elbow or knee dislocation, GSW, ISS≥16 and age<55 years as independent predictors for the need for fasciotomy.

CONCLUSION

After extremity trauma, approximately 1% of patients will require a fasciotomy. The need for fasciotomy varied widely by injury mechanism and type reaching 42% in patients who sustained a combined arterial and venous injury. The above risk factors were identified as independent predictors for the need for fasciotomy.

Outcome comparison between open and endovascular management of axillosubclavian arterial injuries

BACKGROUND

Endovascular repair (ER) of axillosubclavian arterial injuries is a minimally invasive alternative to open repair (OR). The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of ER vs OR.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed of patients who sustained axillosubclavian arterial injuries admitted to two high-volume academic trauma centers between 2003 and 2013. Patients undergoing ER and OR were matched according to 25 different demographic and clinical variables in a 1:3 ratio using propensity scores. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were complications and length of stay.

RESULTS

Among 153 patients (79.7% male; mean age, 32.7 ± 15.9 years) who sustained axillosubclavian arterial injuries, 18 (11.8%) underwent ER and 135 (88.2%) had OR. Matched cases (ER, n = 18) and controls (OR, n = 54) had similar demographic and clinical data, such as age, gender, admission systolic blood pressure and Glasgow Coma Scale score, body Abbreviated Injury Scale scores, Injury Severity Score, and transfusion requirements. Patients undergoing ER had significantly lower in-hospital mortality compared with patients undergoing OR (5.6% vs 27.8%; P = .040; odds ratio, 0.7; 95% confidence interval, 0.6-0.9). Similarly, patients undergoing ER had substantially lower rates of surgical site infections and a trend toward lower rates of sepsis. Outpatient follow-up was available in 88.2% (n = 15) of the patients at a median time of 8 months (1-30 months). Two ER patients required open reintervention for stent-related complications (one for a type Ia endoleak and another for stent thrombosis).

CONCLUSIONS

In our experience with axillosubclavian arterial injuries, ER was associated with improved mortality and lower complication rates. Patient follow-up demonstrates an acceptable reintervention rate after ER. Further multicenter prospective evaluation is warranted to determine long-term outcomes.

Fractures of the pelvic ring

Traumatic disruptions of the pelvic ring are high energy life threatening injuries. Management represents a significant challenge, particularly in the acute setting in the presence of severe haemorrhage. Initial management is focused on preserving life by controlling haemorrhage and associated injuries. Advances in prehospital care, surgery, interventional radiology and the introduction of treatment algorithms to streamline decision making have improved patient survival. As more patients with unstable pelvic injuries survive, the poor results associated with nonoperative management and increasing patient expectations of outcome are making surgical management of these fractures increasingly common. The aim of operative fracture fixation is to correct deformity and restore function. The advent of percutaneous fixation techniques has reduced the morbidity previously associated with large operative exposures and internal fixation.

Delayed endovascular aortic repair is associated with reduced in-hospital mortality in patients with blunt thoracic aortic injury

OBJECTIVE

The traditional approach to stable blunt thoracic aortic injury (BTAI) endorsed by the Society for Vascular Surgery is early (<24 hours) thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). Recently, some studies have shown improved mortality in stable BTAI patients repaired in a delayed manner (≥24 hours). However, the indications for use of delayed TEVAR for BTAI are not well characterized, and its overall impact on the patient's survival remains poorly understood. We sought to determine whether delayed TEVAR is associated with a decrease in mortality compared with early TEVAR in this population.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult patients with BTAI (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision diagnosis code 901.0) who underwent TEVAR (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision procedure code 39.73) from 2009 to 2013 using the National Sample Program data set. Missing physiologic data were imputed using chained multiple imputation. Patients were parsed into groups based on the timing of TEVAR (early, <24 hours, vs delayed, ≥24 hours). The χ², Mann-Whitney, and Fisher exact tests were used to compare baseline characteristics and outcomes of interest between groups. Multivariable logistic regression for mortality was performed that included all variables significant at P ≤ .2 in univariate analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 2045 adult patients with BTAI were identified, of whom 534 (26%) underwent TEVAR. Patients with missing data on TEVAR timing were excluded (n = 27), leaving a total of 507 patients for analysis (75% male; 69% white; median age, 40 years [interquartile range, 27-56 years]; median Injury Severity Score [ISS], 34 [interquartile range, 26-41]). Of these, 378 patients underwent early TEVAR and 129 underwent delayed TEVAR. The two groups were similar with regard to age, sex, race, ISS, and presenting physiology. Mortality was 11.9% in the early TEVAR group vs 5.4% in the delayed group, with the early group displaying a higher odds of death (odds ratio, 2.36; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-5.36; P = .042). After adjustment for age, ISS, and admission physiology, the association between early TEVAR and mortality was preserved (adjusted odds ratio, 2.39; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-5.67; P = .047).

CONCLUSIONS

Consistent with current Society for Vascular Surgery recommendations, more BTAI patients underwent early TEVAR than delayed TEVAR during the study period. However, delayed TEVAR was associated with significantly reduced mortality in this population. Together, these findings support a need for critical appraisal and clarification of existing practice guidelines in management of BTAI. Future studies should seek to understand this survival disparity and to determine optimal selection of patients for early vs delayed TEVAR.

Intentional left subclavian artery coverage during thoracic endovascular aortic repair for traumatic aortic injury

BACKGROUND

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is widely used for treatment of traumatic aortic injury (TAI). Stent graft coverage of the left subclavian artery (LSA) may be required in up to 40% of patients. We evaluated the long-term effects of intentional LSA coverage (LSAC) on symptoms and return to normal activity in TAI patients compared with a similarly treated group whose LSA was uncovered (LSAU).

METHODS

Patients were identified from a prospective institutional trauma registry between September 2005 and July 2012. TAI was confirmed using computed tomography angiography. The electronic medical records, angiograms, and computed tomography angiograms were reviewed in a retrospective fashion. In-person or telephone interviews were conducted using the SF-12v2 (Quality Metrics, Lincoln, RI) to assess quality of life. An additional questionnaire was used to assess specific LSA symptoms and the ability to return to normal activities. Data were analyzed by Spearman rank correlation and multiple linear and logistic regression analysis with appropriate transformations using SAS software (SAS Institute, Cary, NC).

RESULTS

During the study period, 82 patients (57 men; mean age 40.5 ± 20 years, mean Injury Severity Score, 34 ± 10.0) underwent TEVAR for treatment of TAI. Among them, LSAC was used in 32 (39.5%) and LSAU in 50. A group of the LSAU patients (n = 22) served as matched controls in the analysis. We found no statistically significant difference in SF-12v2 physical health scores (ρ = -0.08; P = .62) between LSAC and LSAU patients. LSAC patients had slightly better mental health scores (ρ = 0.62; P = .037) than LSAU patients. LSAC patients did not have an increased likelihood of experiencing pain (ρ = -0.0056; P = .97), numbness (ρ = -0.12; P = .45), paresthesia (ρ = -0.11; P = .48), fatigue (ρ = -0.066; P = .69), or cramping (ρ = -0.12; P = .45). We found no difference between groups in the ability to return to activities. The mean follow-up time was 3.35 years. Six LSAC patients (19%) died during the follow-up period of unrelated causes.

CONCLUSIONS

Intentional LSAC during TEVAR for TAI appears safe, without compromising mental or physical health outcomes. Furthermore, LSAC does not increase the long-term risk of upper extremity symptoms or impairment of normal activities.

Epidemiology and outcomes of traumatic knee dislocations: Isolated vs multi-trauma injuries

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Traumatic dislocation of the knee (TKD) is a rare injury, accounting for approximately 0.02% of orthopaedic injuries. They are a challenging entity for orthopaedic surgeons to manage, and can have devastating consequences. The aim of this study was to describe the epidemiology of traumatic knee dislocations (TKD'S) and contrast the incidence of neurovascular injury between isolated and multi-trauma dislocations as well as key patient reported outcomes achieved between these groups.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patients who had a traumatic disruption of the tibiofemoral articulation between March 1 2007 and February 31, 2015 were identified from the Victorian Orthopaedic Trauma Outcomes Registry (VOTOR). Data was cross-checked with medical records and radiological reports to confirm true multi-ligamentous dislocation. VOTOR collects information pertaining to orthopaedic injuries, treatment, complications and outcomes from four adult hospitals in Victoria, Australia, including the major trauma centers. Patient-reported outcomes are collected by VOTOR at 12 months post-injury including the EQ-5D-3L (EQ-5D) and Glasgow Extended Outcome Scores (GOS-E) and return to work status. Patient reported functional and quality of life outcomes at 12 months after injury were analysed.

RESULTS

A cohort of 88 patients were identified that fit the inclusion criteria for the study, and at 12 months post-injury there was data available for 80 patients (90.9%). There were 38 (42.9%) patients who experienced an isolated traumatic knee dislocation and 52 (57.1%) who experienced a traumatic knee dislocation in association with another injury. Of the 88 patients identified as eligible for the study, two had bilateral knee dislocations, hence there were 90 multi-ligamentous knee injuries. Those who were injured at a higher velocity were more likely to have additional injuries. Dislocations that occurred at a lower velocity were shown to have better overall outcomes, as did dislocations that occurred in isolation.

CONCLUSIONS

Traumatic knee dislocations that occur in isolation typically result in better outcomes than those that occur with associated injuries. TKD's are a rare but severe injury that requires further research in order for functional outcomes to be optimized.

Percutaneous balloon-expandable covered stent implantation for treatment of traumatic aortic injury in children and adolescents

Surgical treatment of pediatric acute traumatic aortic injury (TAI) after blunt chest trauma is standard of care. Use of endovascular stent grafts for treatment of TAI in adults is common but has important limitations in children. We sought to describe the use of balloon-expandable covered endovascular stents for treatment of TAI in children and adolescents. Participants of the multicenter Coarctation of the Aorta Stent Trial (COAST) had access to investigational large-diameter, balloon-expandable, covered stents (covered Cheatham-platinum stents; NuMed, Inc., Hopkinton, New York) on an emergency-use basis. From 2008 through 2011, 6 covered stents were implanted in 4 patients at 3 COAST centers for treatment of TAI. Median patient age was 13.5 years (range 11 to 14) and weight was 58 kg (40 to 130). All patients sustained severe extracardiac injuries that were judged to preclude safe open surgical repair of TAI. Median aortic isthmus and stent implantation balloon diameters were 16.4 mm (13.2 to 19) and 19 mm (16 to 20), respectively. Stent implantation was technically successful in all attempts. Complete exclusion of aortic wall injury was achieved in all cases. There were no access site complications. At a median follow-up of 24 months, there was 1 early death (related to underlying head trauma) and 1 patient with recurrent aortic aneurysm who required additional stent implantation. In conclusion, balloon-expandable covered-stent implantation for treatment of pediatric TAI after blunt trauma is generally safe and effective. Availability of this equipment may alter the standard approach to treatment of pediatric TAI.

Vascular Injury in Orthopedic Trauma

Vascular injury in orthopedic trauma is challenging. The risk to life and limb can be high, and clinical signs initially can be subtle. Recognition and management should be a critical skill for every orthopedic surgeon. There are 5 types of vascular injury: intimal injury (flaps, disruptions, or subintimal/intramural hematomas), complete wall defects with pseudoaneurysms or hemorrhage, complete transections with hemorrhage or occlusion, arteriovenous fistulas, and spasm. Intimal defects and subintimal hematomas with possible secondary occlusion are most commonly associated with blunt trauma, whereas wall defects, complete transections, and arteriovenous fistulas usually occur with penetrating trauma. Spasm can occur after either blunt or penetrating trauma to an extremity and is more common in young patients. Clinical presentation of vascular injury may not be straightforward. Physical examination can be misleading or initially unimpressive; a normal pulse examination may be present in 5% to 15% of patients with vascular injury. Detection and treatment of vascular injuries should take place within the context of the overall resuscitation of the patient according to the established principles of the Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) protocols. Advances in the field, made mostly during times of war, have made limb salvage the rule rather than the exception. Teamwork, familiarity with the often subtle signs of vascular injuries, a high index of suspicion, effective communication, appropriate use of imaging modalities, sound knowledge of relevant technique, and sequence of surgical repairs are among the essential factors that will lead to a successful outcome. This article provides a comprehensive literature review on a subject that generates significant controversy and confusion among clinicians involved in the care of trauma patients. [Orthopedics. 2016; 39(4):249-259.].

Knee dislocation and vascular injury: 4 year experience at a UK Major Trauma Centre and vascular hub

INTRODUCTION

Knee dislocation is a rare but potentially devastating injury. Quoted rates of associated vascular compromise vary dramatically between 3.3% and 64%, and the best approach to investigate and diagnose such an injury remains controversial. We aim to evaluate our own 4-year experience of knee dislocation and vascular injury as a UK Major Trauma Centre and vascular hub.

METHODS

Knee dislocation was defined as disruption of at least two major stabilising ligaments of the knee and gross instability requiring an operation. Patients were identified from the Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics patient database across a 4 year period from 2010 to 2014. Electronic patient records, imaging and hard notes were retrieved and reviewed retrospectively and relevant information recorded.

RESULTS

Twenty-five cases of knee dislocation were identified. Male to female ratio was 11.5:1 with a mean age of 33 years (range 17-71). One patient had a vascular injury which ultimately required a femoro-popliteal bypass graft. Twenty-four patients had documented examination findings pertaining to the vascular status of the limb. Seventeen patients had specific reference to the presence or absence of pedal pulses. The remaining seven cases were documented as either "warm well perfused" or "neurovascularly in-tact". Nine patients were discharged directly from the emergency department with outpatient follow up. All admitted cases had documented vascular examination findings the following day. Two patients had additional adjunctive non-invasive investigations. No patients were examined with duplex ultrasound, although two patients had pulses confirmed with hand-held doppler ultrasound. Three patients had an angiogram. Four cases have a documented discussion with or review from a vascular surgeon.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

Our rates of vascular injury are in line with the most recent and largest study to date. Non-invasive investigation and selective angiography has been safe in identifying significant vascular compromise, however, there is inconsistency in management pathways, and too much reassurance attributed to the presence of pedal pulses on initial examination. Safety and consistency could be improved with the introduction of a formalised evidence-based protocol for the initial evaluation of knee dislocation and vascular injury.

Human endothelial progenitor cells isolated from COPD patients are dysfunctional

Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with moderate-to-severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). More than 44% of these patients present with generalized atherosclerosis at autopsy. It is accepted that endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) participate in the repair of dysfunctional endothelium and thus protects against atherosclerosis. However, whether COPD affects the repairing capacity of EPCs is unknown. Therefore, the objective of this study was to determine whether and how EPCs are involved in the vascular repair process in patients with COPD. In our study, EPCs from 25 COPD and 16 control patients were isolated by Ficoll density-gradient centrifugation and identified using fluorescence activated cell sorting. Transwell Migratory Assay was performed to determine the number of EPC colony-forming units and the adherent capacity late-EPCs to human umbilical vein endothelial cells. Following arterial damage in NOD/SCID mice, the number of EPCs incorporated at the injured vascular site was determined using a fluorescence microscope. We found that the number of EPC clusters and cell migration, as well as the expression of CXCR4, was significantly decreased in patients with COPD. Additionally, the number of late-EPCs adherent to HUVEC tubules was significantly reduced, and fewer VEGFR2(+)-staining cells were incorporated into the injured site in COPD patients. Our study demonstrates that EPC capacity of repair was affected in COPD patients, which may contribute to altered vascular endothelium in this patient population.

Critical review of pelvic fractures associated with external iliac artery lesion: a series of six cases

INTRODUCTION

Bleeding associated with pelvic fracture mostly comes from the pre-sacral and lumbar venous plexus, or directly from the fracture site. Bleeding as a consequence of arterial lesion is less common (15-20%), and that resulting from lesion of the external iliac artery (EIA) is extremely rare. The mortality rate associated with iliac artery injury ranges from 38% to 72%. Total body CT-scan with contrast medium, angiography or packing can be performed when there is arterial injury. In some cases, embolisation can stop bleeding; however, when there is involvement of the aorta, common iliac artery or EIA, immediate surgery is mandatory. The aim of this study was to report our experience of pelvic fractures associated with EIA lesion.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Six patients with pelvic fracture and associated rupture of the EIA have been observed at our unit from 2004 to 2009. According to Tile classification there were three cases of type C and two cases of type B fracture. One case was a two-column acetabular fracture. Angiography was performed in all cases.

RESULTS

Three patients died on the day of trauma: two after angiography, and one after surgery of vascular repair. Three patients survived: two underwent a hemipelvectomy, and one underwent hip disarticulation.

DISCUSSION

Haemodynamic instability in patients with pelvic ring fracture is usually because of venous bleeding from the pre-sacral and lumbar plexus, or from the fracture site. Arterial injury is present in around 20% of cases. EIA lesions require immediate surgical treatment to restore blood flow. Depending on the type of injury, vascular surgery can be associated with pelvic fracture stabilisation.

CONCLUSIONS

Pelvic ring fracture associated with an EIA lesion is extremely rare, with few cases reported in the literature. Angiography is used for diagnosis, and immediate surgical treatment is required to restore blood flow. Associated injuries and open fracture can lead to fatal complications or amputation. Rates of mortality and severe disability are extremely high.

Vascular injuries in the upper extremity in athletes

Repetitive, high-stress, or high-impact arm motions can cause upper extremity arterial injuries. The increased functional range of the upper extremity causes increased stresses on the vascular structures. Muscle hypertrophy and fatigue-induced joint translation may incite impingement on critical neurovasculature and can cause vascular damage. A thorough evaluation is essential to establish the diagnosis in a timely fashion as presentation mimics more common musculoskeletal injuries. Conservative treatment includes equipment modification, motion analysis and adjustment, as well as equipment enhancement to limit exposure to blunt trauma or impingement. Surgical options include ligation, primary end-to-end anastomosis for small defects, and grafting.

Damage control laparotomy and delayed pancreatoduodenectomy for complex combined pancreatoduodenal and venous injuries

BACKGROUND

This single-centre study evaluated the efficacy of damage control surgery and delayed pancreatoduodenectomy and reconstruction in patients who had combined severe pancreatic head and visceral venous injuries.

METHODS

Prospectively recorded data of patients who underwent an initial damage control laparotomy and a subsequent pancreatoduodenectomy for severe pancreatic injuries were evaluated to assess optimal operative sequencing.

RESULTS

During the 20-year study period, 312 patients were treated for pancreatic injuries of whom 14 underwent a pancreatoduodenectomy. Six (five men, one woman, median age 20, range 16-39 years) of the 14 patients were in extremis with exsanguinating venous bleeding and non-reconstructable AAST grade 5 pancreatoduodenal injuries and underwent a damage control laparotomy followed by delayed pancreatoduodenectomy and reconstruction when stable. During the initial DCS, the blood loss compared to the subsequent laparotomy and definitive procedure was 5456 ml, range 2318-7665 vs 1250 ml, range 850-3600 ml (p < 0.01). The mean total fluid administered in the operating room was 11,150 ml, range 8450-13,320 vs 6850 ml, range 3350-9020 ml (p < 0.01). The mean operating room time was 113 min, range 90-140 vs 335 min, range 260-395 min (p < 0.01). During the second laparotomy five patients had a pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy and one a standard Whipple resection. Four of the six patients survived. Two patients died in hospital, one of MOF and coagulopathy and the other of intra-abdominal sepsis and multi-organ failure. Median duration of intensive care was 6 days, (range 1-20 days) and median duration of hospital stay was 29 days, (range 1-94 days).

CONCLUSION

Damage control laparotomy and delayed secondary pancreatoduodenectomy is a live-saving procedure in the small cohort of patients who have dire pancreatic and vascular injuries. When used appropriately, the staged resection and reconstruction allows survival in a previously unsalvageable group of patients who have severe physiological derangement.

Avulsive axillary artery injury in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty

In addition to neurologic injuries such as peripheral nerve palsy, axillary vessel injury should be recognized as a possible complication of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Limb lengthening associated with Grammont-type reverse total shoulder arthroplasty places tension across the brachial plexus and axillary vessels and may contribute to observed injuries. The Grammont-type reverse total shoulder arthroplasty prosthesis reverses the shoulder ball and socket, shifts the shoulder center of rotation distal and medial, and lengthens the arm. This alteration of native anatomy converts shearing to compressive glenohumeral joint forces while augmenting and tensioning the deltoid lever arm. Joint stability is enhanced; shoulder elevation is enabled in the rotator cuff–deficient shoulder. Arm lengthening associated with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty places a longitudinal strain on the brachial plexus and axillary vessels. Peripheral nerve palsies and other neurologic complications of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty have been documented. The authors describe a patient with rotator cuff tear arthropathy and a history of radioulnar synostosis who underwent reverse total shoulder arthroplasty complicated by intraoperative injury to the axillary artery and postoperative radial, ulnar, and musculocutaneous nerve palsies. Following a seemingly unremarkable placement of reverse shoulder components, brisk arterial bleeding was encountered while approximating the incised subscapularis tendon in preparation for wound closure. Further exploration revealed an avulsive-type injury of the axillary artery. After an unsuccessful attempt at primary repair, a synthetic arterial bypass graft was placed. Reperfusion of the right upper extremity was achieved and has been maintained to date. Postoperative clinical examination and electromyographic studies confirmed ongoing radial, ulnar, and musculocutaneous neuropathies.

Literature review of peripheral vascular trauma: Is the era of intervention coming?

Traumatic peripheral vascular injury is a significant cause of disability and death either in civilian environments or on the battlefield. Penetrating trauma and blunt trauma are the most common forms of vascular injuries. Besides, iatrogenic arterial injury (IAI) is another pattern of vascular trauma. The management of peripheral vascular injuries has been improved in different environments and wars. There are different types of vascular injuries, such as vasospasm, contusion, intimal flaps, intimal disruption or hematoma, external compression, laceration, transection and focal wall defects, etc. The main clinical manifestations of vascular injuries are shock following massive hemorrhage and limb necrosis due to tissue and organ ischemia. Ultrasound, computed tomography angiography (CTA) and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) are most valuable for assessment of peripheral vascular injuries. Angiography remains the gold standard for diagnosing vascular trauma. Immediate hemorrhage control and rapid restoration of blood flow are the primary goals of vascular trauma treatment. There are many operative treatment methods for vascular injuries, such as vascular suture or ligation, vascular wall repair and vascular reconstruction with blood vessel prostheses or vascular grafts. Embolization, balloon dilation and covered stent implantation are the main endovascular techniques. Surgical operation is still the primary treatment for vascular injuries. Endovascular treatment is a promising alternative, proved to be safe and effective, and preferred selection for patients. In summary, rapid diagnosis and timely surgical intervention remain the mainstays of the treatment. However, many issues need to be resolved by further studies.

Treatment of infrapopliteal post-PTA dissection with tack implants: 12-month results from the TOBA-BTK study

OBJECTIVES

The Tack implant is designed for focal, minimal metal management of dissections. This study evaluated Tacks for treating postpercutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) dissection in patients with below-the-knee (BTK) arterial occlusive disease.

BACKGROUND

PTA is the most commonly used endovascular treatment for patients with occlusive disease of the BTK vessels. Post-PTA dissection is a significant clinical problem that results in poor outcomes, but currently there are limited treatment options for managing dissections.

METHODS

This prospective, single-arm study evaluated patients with CLI and BTK lesions; 11.4% were Rutherford category (RC) 4 and 88.6% were RC 5. BTK occlusive disease was treated with standard PTA and post-PTA dissections were treated with Tack placement. The primary safety endpoint was a composite of major adverse limb events (MALE) and perioperative death (POD) at 30 days. Other endpoints included: device success; procedure success (vessel patency in the absence of MALE); freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR); primary patency; and changes in RC. Data through 12 months are presented.

RESULTS

Thirty-two of 35 (91.4%) patients had post-PTA dissection and successful deployment of Tacks. Procedural success was achieved in 34/35 (97.1%) patients with no MALEs at 30 days. The 12-month patency rate was 78.4% by vessel, 77.4% by patient, and freedom from CD-TLR was 93.5%. Significant (P < .0001) improvement from baseline was observed in RC (75% of patients improved 4 or 5 steps).

CONCLUSION

Tack implant treatment of post-PTA dissection was safe and effective for treatment of BTK dissections and resulted in reasonable 12-month patency and low rates of CD-TLR.

Endovascular versus open repair of isolated superficial femoral and popliteal artery injuries

OBJECTIVE

Despite the increasing use of endovascular therapy for traumatic arterial injuries, little is known about the outcomes of endovascular repair of superficial femoral artery (SFA) and popliteal artery (PA) injuries. In the present study, we compared the characteristics and outcomes of endovascular vs open repair of traumatic SFA and PA injuries.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective National Trauma Data Bank analysis of trauma patients with a blunt or penetrating injury of the SFA and/or PA who had undergone endovascular or open repair from 2007 to 2014. Multivariate logistic regression was used to compare the outcomes, with propensity score matching used for sensitivity analysis.

RESULTS

The incidence of SFA and PA injuries was 0.2%, with an overall increase in the annual use of endovascular stent repair from 3.2% in 2007 to 7.6% in 2014 (P = .002). A total of 2,873 patients with an isolated SFA and/or PA injury were included in the present study, of whom 163 (5.7%) had undergone endovascular repair. SFA injuries were more frequently treated with endovascular repair (70% vs 27%) and PA injuries were more often associated with open repair (41.1% vs 54.7%). Open repair was more frequently associated with a concomitant femur fracture or knee dislocation (30.7% vs 38.8%; P = .039). Endovascular repair was not associated with worse in-hospital amputation-free survival (AFS) compared with open repair on univariate analysis (91.1% vs 89.7%; P = .573) or multivariate logistic regression (odds ratio [OR], 1.053; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.551-2.012; P = .876). Propensity score matching revealed that in-hospital mortality was higher (OR, 3.69; 95% CI, 1.37-9.82; P = .01) and fasciotomy was lower (OR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.14-0.37; P < .001) in the endovascular repair group, with no significant differences in AFS (OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.48-1.67; P = .65).

CONCLUSIONS

Endovascular repair of SFA and PA injuries has in-hospital AFS comparable to that for open repair, supporting the increasing use of endovascular repair for traumatic SFA and PA injuries in appropriately selected cases. Given the unexpected finding of increased in-hospital mortality after endovascular repair, further studies are necessary to determine the appropriate patient selection and the durability of endovascular repair.

Endovascular Repair of Blunt Popliteal Arterial Injuries

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of endovascular repair for blunt popliteal arterial injuries.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis of seven patients with clinical suspicion of popliteal arterial injuries that were confirmed by arteriography was performed from September 2009 to July 2014. Clinical data included demographics, mechanism of injury, type of injury, location of injury, concomitant injuries, time of endovascular procedures, time interval from trauma to blood flow restoration, instrument utilized, and follow-up. All patients were male (mean age of 35.9 ± 10.3 years). The type of lesion involved intimal injury (n = 1), partial transection (n = 2), complete transection (n = 2), arteriovenous fistula (n = 1), and pseudoaneurysm (n = 1). All patients underwent endovascular repair of blunt popliteal arterial injuries.

RESULTS

Technical success rate was 100%. Intimal injury was treated with a bare-metal stent. Pseudoaneurysm and popliteal artery transections were treated with bare-metal stents. Arteriovenous fistula was treated with bare-metal stent and coils. No perioperative death and procedure-related complication occurred. The average follow-up was 20.9 ± 2.3 months (range 18-24 months). One patient underwent intra-arterial thrombolysis due to stent thrombosis at 18 months after the procedure. All limbs were salvaged. Stent migration, deformation, or fracture was not found during the follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Endovascular repair seems to be a viable approach for patients with blunt popliteal arterial injuries, especially on an emergency basis. Endovascular repair may be effective in the short-term. Further studies are required to evaluate the long-term efficacy of endovascular repair.

Use of stent grafts in lower extremity trauma

BACKGROUND

Permanent endovascular stenting is gradually becoming recognized as a safe and efficacious method for treating a variety of arterial diseases. The literature on its application in trauma care is sparse, although indications for usage continue to evolve.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all penetrating extremity trauma treated with endovascular therapy at our medical center between 2005 and 2008.

RESULTS

We present three patients with three different arterial lesions in the superficial femoral artery (SFA) which were caused by penetrating injury. The arterial lesions include a mid-thigh SFA pseudoaneurysm, an intimal disruption of the distal SFA, and an arteriovenous fistula involving the SFA and superficial femoral vein. All were treated with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stents and showed excellent short-term results. A percutaneous approach to this problem may reduce blood loss, decrease length of stay, involve fewer iatrogenic nerve injuries, and facilitate shorter recovery time, as compared with open approaches.

CONCLUSIONS

Endovascular-covered stent placement for traumatic arterial extremity injury was used with excellent results and no morbidity in this small series of patients. Endovascular solutions for arterial extremity injuries warrant further investigation for short- and long-term results.

Therapeutic reendothelialization by induced pluripotent stem cells after vascular injury--brief report

OBJECTIVE

Endothelial damage is an early requisite step for atherosclerosis after vascular injury. It has been reported that vascular wall cells can develop from induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cell-derived fetal liver kinase-1-positive (Flk-1(+)) cells. Here, we investigated the efficacies of intravenously administered iPS cell-derived Flk-1(+) cells on reendothelialization and neointimal hyperplasia in a mouse model of vascular injury.

APPROACH AND RESULTS

Femoral arteries of KSN nude mice were injured using a steel wire. Mouse iPS cell-derived Flk-1(+) or Flk-1(-) cells were intravenously injected into those mice at 24 hours after vascular injury. Delivery of iPS cell-derived Flk-1(+) cells significantly attenuated neointimal hyperplasia compared with controls. Evans blue staining of the injured vessel revealed that administration of iPS cell-derived Flk-1(+) significantly enhanced reendothelialization compared with the Flk-1(-) cell control group. Recruitment of PKH26-labeled iPS cell-derived Flk-1(+) cells to the site of injury was also detectable. Expression level of CXCR4 in iPS cell-derived Flk-1(+) cells was 7.5-fold higher than that of iPS cell-derived Flk-1(-) cells. Stromal cell-derived factor-1α treatment significantly enhanced adhesion and migration of iPS cell-derived Flk-1(+) cells to the endothelia, but these were not observed in Flk-1(-) cells.

CONCLUSIONS

Intravenously administered iPS cell-derived Flk-1(+) cells are recruited to the site of vascular injury, thereby enhancing reendothelialization followed by suppression of neointimal hyperplasia. Administration of iPS cell-derived Flk-1(+) cells is a potentially useful therapeutic means for vascular dysfunction and prevention of restenosis after angioplasty.

Endovascular stent-graft treatment for a traumatic vertebrovertebral arteriovenous fistula with pseudoaneurysm

The rarely occurring vertebrovertebral arteriovenous fistula (VVAVF) is characterized by abnormal direct communications between the vertebral artery or its branches and the neighboring venous system. We present our experience using a stent graft to occlude a chronic, traumatic VVAVF. A 40-year-old woman with dizziness and loud bruits from the occiput underwent digital subtraction angiography (DSA), which revealed a VVAVF with pseudoaneurysm at the C5-C6 level, with retrograde flow from the right vertebral artery. A stent graft was placed across the fistula after balloon dilation. The fistula and pseudoaneurysm disappeared immediately. After 9 months, the patient remained asymptomatic with a patent stent.

Endovascular management of lap belt-related abdominal aortic injury in a 9-year-old child

Blunt abdominal aortic trauma is a rare occurrence in children with only a few patients having been reported in the literature. Most such cases have been described in the context of lap belt injuries. We report a 9-year-old boy who suffered lap belt trauma to the abdomen during a high-speed road traffic accident resulting to the well-recognized pattern of blunt abdominal injury, that is, the triad of intestinal perforation, fractures of the lumbar spine, and abdominal aortic injury. The latter presented with lower limb ischemia due to dissection of the infrarenal aorta and right common iliac artery. Revascularization was achieved by endovascular means using 2 self-expanding stents in the infrarenal aorta and the right common iliac artery. This case is one of the few reports of lap belt-related acute traumatic abdominal aortic dissection in a young child and highlights the feasibility of endovascular management in the pediatric population.

Endovascular Repair of Blunt Thoracic Aortic Trauma: Is Postimplant Hypertension an Incidental Finding?

BACKGROUND

Blunt thoracic aortic injury (BTAI) is the second most common cause of death in trauma patients. Nowadays, thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) has become the treatment of choice because of lower rates of mortality, paraplegia, and stroke. However, concerns have been raised whether graft implantation is related to the development of hypertension in the postoperative period. The aim of this study was to report short- and long-term outcomes of patients undergoing TEVAR for BTAIs at a tertiary hospital and to investigate postimplant hypertension.

METHODS

Between January 2005 and January 2016, 23 patients with blunt thoracic aortic trauma underwent TEVAR. Median age was 44 years (range, 18-73). Among them, 14 (60.9%) patients were diagnosed with aortic rupture, whereas 9 (39.1%) with pseudoaneurysm. Α single thoracic stent graft was deployed in 21 patients, and the rest 2 patients received 2 stent grafts.

RESULTS

Complete exclusion of the injury was feasible in all subjects (100% primary success). The left subclavian artery (SCA) was intentionally covered in 6 patients (26%). Intraoperative complications included one nonfatal stroke managed conservatively and one external iliac artery rupture treated with iliofemoral bypass. One patient (4.3%) died on the first postoperative day in the intensive care unit (ICU) because of hemorrhagic shock. The overall 30-day mortality and morbidity were 4.3% and 8.7%, respectively. New-onset postimplantation arterial hypertension was observed in 8 (34.8%) previously nonhypertensive patients. Younger age (P = 0.027) and SCA coverage (P = 0.01) were identified as potential risk factors for the development of postimplant hypertension, whereas the presence of concomitant injuries (P = 0.3) and intraoperative complications (P = 0.1) were not. After a median follow-up of 100 months (range, 18-120), 6 of them still remain on antihypertensive therapy, whereas the other 2 did not require permanent treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

TEVAR is a safe approach in the treatment of BTAI associated with low short- and long-term morbidity and mortality rates. Lower age and SCA coverage may contribute to the development of postimplant hypertension. Further larger cohort studies are warranted to elucidate the underlying mechanisms of postimplant hypertension.

Popliteal artery injuries. Less ischemic time may lead to improved outcomes

BACKGROUND

Popliteal artery injuries are rare. They have high amputation rates.

OBJECTIVES

To report our experience, identify predictors of outcome; mechanism of injury (MOI), Mangled Extremity Severity Score (MESS) score and length of ischemic time. We hypothesized that ischemic time as close to six hours results in improved outcomes.

METHODS

Retrospective 132-month study. All popliteal artery injuries. Urban Level I Trauma Center.

OUTCOME MEASURES

MOI, ISS, MESS, ischemic time, risk factors for amputation, role of popliteal venous injuries, and limb salvage.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

univariate and multivariate.

RESULTS

76 patients - 59 (76.1%) males and 17 (22.4%) females. MOI: penetrating - 54 (71%). MESS for penetrating injuries - 5.8 ± 1.5, blunt injuries - 5.6 ± 1.8. Admission-perfusion restoration (n = 76) - 5.97 hours (358 minutes). Ischemic time was not predictive of outcome (p = 0.79). Ischemic time penetrating (n = 58) 5.9 hours (354 ± 209 minutes), blunt 6.1 hours (371 ± 201 minutes). Popliteal arterial repairs: RSVG 44 (58%), primary repair 21 (26%), PTFE 3 (4%), vein patch 2 (2%), ligation 2 (3%), exsanguinated 4 (6%). No patients underwent stenting. Popliteal Vein: Repair 19 (65%), ligation 10 (35%). Fasciotomies 45 patients (59%).

OUTCOMES

Limb salvage - 90% (68/76). Adjusted limb salvage excluding intraoperative deaths - 94% (68/72). Selected patient characteristics; MOI: penetrating vs. blunt - age (p <0.0005). Amputated vs. non-amputated patients, age (p < 0.05). ISS (p < 0.005) predicted amputation, MESS (p = 0.98) did not. Mean ischemic time (p = 0.79) did not predict amputation. Relative risk of amputation, MOI - blunt (p = 0.26, RR 4.67, 95% CI: 1.11 - 14.1), popliteal artery ligation (p = 0.06, RR 3.965, 95% CI: 1.11 - 14.1) as predictors of outcome. Combined artery and vein injuries (p = 0.25) did not predict amputation.

CONCLUSIONS

Decreasing ischemic time from arrival to restoration of perfusion may lead to improved outcomes and increased limb salvage. MESS is not predictive for amputation. Blunt MOI is a risk factor for amputation. Maintaining ischemic times as close to six hours as possible may lead to improved outcomes.