Impact of Viloxazine Extended-Release Capsules (Qelbree®) on Select Cytochrome P450 Enzyme Activity and Evaluation of CYP2D6 Genetic Polymorphisms on Viloxazine Pharmacokinetics

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Viloxazine extended-release (ER) [Qelbree®] is a nonstimulant attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) treatment. In vitro studies suggested potential for viloxazine to inhibit cytochrome 450 (CYP) enzymes 1A2, 2B6, 2D6 and 3A4. This clinical study therefore evaluated viloxazine ER effects on index substrates for CYP1A2, 2D6, and 3A4, and secondarily evaluated the impact of CYP2D6 polymorphisms on viloxazine pharmacokinetics.

METHODS

Thirty-seven healthy subjects received a modified Cooperstown cocktail (MCC; caffeine 200 mg, dextromethorphan 30 mg, midazolam 0.025 mg/kg) on Day 1, viloxazine ER 900 mg/day on Days 3-5, and a combination of viloxazine ER 900 mg and MCC on Day 6. Viloxazine ER effects on MCC substrates were evaluated using analysis of variance. The impact of CYP2D6 genetic polymorphisms on steady-state viloxazine plasma concentrations was evaluated using Student's t test assessing pharmacokinetic parameter differences between poor versus extensive metabolizers.

RESULTS

The least squares geometric mean ratio [GMR%] (90% CI) of MCC substrate + viloxazine ER/MCC substrate alone for caffeine maximum concentration (Cmax), area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to the last quantifiable concentration (AUCt), and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 extrapolated to infinity (AUC∞) was 99.11 (95.84-102.49), 436.15 (398.87-476.92), and 583.35 (262.41-1296.80), respectively; 150.76 (126.03-180.35), 185.76 (155.01-222.61), and 189.71 (160.37-224.42) for dextromethorphan Cmax, AUCt, and AUC∞, respectively; and 112.81 (104.71-121.54), 167.56 (153.05-183.45), and 168.91 (154.38-184.80) for midazolam Cmax, AUCt, and AUC∞, respectively. At steady state, viloxazine least squares GMR (90% CI) for poor/extensive CYP2D6 metabolizers were Cmax 120.70 (102.33-142.37) and area under the plasme concentration-time curve from time 0 to 24 hours (AUC0-24 125.66 (105.36-149.87)).

CONCLUSION

Viloxazine ER is a strong CYP1A2 inhibitor and a weak CYP2D6 and CYP3A4 inhibitor. CYP2D6 polymorphisms did not meaningfully alter the viloxazine ER pharmacokinetic profile.

Viloxazine: Pediatric First Approval

Viloxazine (QELBREE™), a selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, is being developed by Supernus Pharmaceuticals as a non-stimulant for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in pediatric and adult patients. This is a novel formulation of a pharmacological agent formerly marketed in Europe for the treatment of depression in adults. Viloxazine received its first pediatric approval in April 2021 in the USA for the treatment of ADHD in pediatric patients aged 6-17 years. Approval was based on positive results from a series of short-term phase III clinical trials in which viloxazine improved the severity of ADHD symptoms in children and adolescents with diagnosed ADHD. Viloxazine is available as extended-release capsules for once-daily oral administration. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of viloxazine leading to this first pediatric approval for ADHD.

Viloxazine in the Management of CNS Disorders: A Historical Overview and Current Status

Viloxazine has a long history of clinical use in Europe as an antidepressant, and has recently been repurposed into an extended-release form for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in the USA. An immediate-release formulation was approved for the treatment of depression in the UK in 1974, and was subsequently marketed there and in several European countries for 30 years with no major safety concerns. In contrast to first-generation antidepressants (e.g., tricyclic antidepressants, monoamine oxidase inhibitors), viloxazine was associated with a relatively low risk for cardiotoxicity. Gastrointestinal symptoms were the most commonly reported side effects. The therapeutic effects of viloxazine are thought to be primarily the result of its action as a norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, although in vitro and preclinical in vivo animal data suggest that viloxazine may also impact the serotoninergic system. This review summarizes the evolving knowledge of viloxazine based on information from previously published preclinical and clinical investigations, and acquired unpublished historical study reports from both open-label and blinded controlled clinical trials. We review the chemical properties, mechanism of action, safety, and tolerability across these studies, and discuss the contemporary rationale for the development of this agent as an extended-release oral formulation for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

Translating Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale-5 and Weiss Functional Impairment Rating Scale-Parent Effectiveness Scores into Clinical Global Impressions Clinical Significance Levels in Four Randomized Clinical Trials of SPN-812 (Viloxazine Extended-Release) in Children and Adolescents with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder

Objectives: Clinical trials in psychiatry frequently report results from lengthy, comprehensive assessments to characterize a subject emotionally, cognitively, and behaviorally before and after treatment. However, the potential treatment implications of these results and how they translate into clinical practice remain unclear. Conversely, the Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) scales are quick, intuitive assessments used to assess the functional impact of a treatment in clinically relevant terms. The objectives of the present analyses are to translate scores from comprehensive assessments of symptom severity and functional impairment into clinically meaningful CGI levels. Methods: These post-hoc analyses use data integrated from four pivotal Phase 3 trials in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children and adolescents treated with the novel nonstimulant SPN-812 (Viloxazine Extended-Release). In this study, we evaluated the ADHD Rating Scale-5 (ADHD-RS-5) and Weiss Functional Impairment Rating Scale-Parent (WFIRS-P), assessments of symptom severity and functional impairment, respectively, by linking these scales with the CGI scales at baseline and end of study. Results: For participants that improved, a one-level change on the CGI-Improvement (CGI-I) was associated with a 10-15-point change on the ADHD-RS-5, and a 0.2-0.5-point change on the WFIRS-P. On the CGI-I, ratings of much improved and very much improved were associated with a percent score decrease (i.e., improvement) of ∼55% and 80% on the ADHD-RS-5 and ∼40% and 70% on the WFIRS-P, respectively. Differences between children and adolescents were minor and are unlikely to be clinically meaningful. Conclusion: These post-hoc analyses provide clinically meaningful benchmarks for the interpretation of scores on the ADHD-RS-5 and WFIRS-P in terms of CGI evaluations in subjects with ADHD. These results may be useful for physicians seeking to understand a treatment's potential impact on their ADHD patients or for researchers looking to define their study results within a clinically relevant context. Data are from clinical trials NCT03247530, NCT03247543, NCT03247517, and NCT03247556.

Pharmacokinetics of Coadministered Viloxazine Extended-Release (SPN-812) and Lisdexamfetamine in Healthy Adults

BACKGROUND

Viloxazine extended-release is a novel nonstimulant under investigation as a potential treatment for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Given the potential for viloxazine extended-release to be co-administered with stimulant ADHD pharmacotherapies, this trial investigated the pharmacokinetics and safety of combination viloxazine extended-release + lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (lisdexamfetamine) versus viloxazine extended-release and lisdexamfetamine alone.

METHODS

In this single-center, cross-over, open-label trial, healthy, non-ADHD adults received single oral doses of 700 mg viloxazine extended-release alone, 50 mg lisdexamfetamine alone, and a combination of viloxazine extended-release (700 mg) + lisdexamfetamine (50 mg), with blood samples collected over 4 days postadministration. The active drug in viloxazine extended-release (viloxazine) and primary metabolite of lisdexamfetamine (d-amphetamine) were measured using chromatographic tandem mass spectrometry. Safety assessments included adverse events, vital signs, echocardiograms, and clinical laboratory evaluations.

RESULTS

Thirty-six adults were enrolled, and 34 completed the trial. The least squares geometric mean ratios are reported as [combination / single drug (90% confidence intervals)]. Viloxazine extended-release: Cmax = 95.96% (91.33-100.82), area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to the last measurable time (AUC0-t) = 99.19% (96.53-101.91), and area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to infinity (AUCinf) = 99.23% (96.61-101.93). Lisdexamfetamine: Cmax = 112.78% (109.93-115.71), AUC0-t = 109.64% (105.25-114.22), and AUCinf = 109.52% (105.19-114.03). All reported adverse events, except 1 (moderate vomiting), were mild in severity.

CONCLUSIONS

Co-administration of viloxazine extended-release and lisdexamfetamine did not impact the pharmacokinetics of viloxazine or d-amphetamine relative to administration of either drug alone. After single dose administration, the combination appeared to be safe and well tolerated.

Citalopram and viloxazine in the treatment of depression by means of slow drop infusion. A double-blind comparative trial

Antidepressant efficacy and tolerability of citalopram and viloxazine were compared under double-blind conditions during the first two weeks of treatment with slow drop infusion, followed by oral administration for the rest of the six week trial period. The 62 severely depressed and hospitalised patients included in the intention-to-treat analysis had a mean age of 45 years (range 23 to 70 years). About two thirds of the patients were female. Thirty patients were allocated to the citalopram and 32 patients to the viloxazine group. The mean MADRS total score at baseline was 34 in both groups and decreased to 12.3 in the citalopram and to 16.9 in the viloxazine group after 14 days of infusion. On day 42 (end point) the scores dropped to 6.7 in the citalopram and to 13.1 in the viloxazine group respectively. The group differences reached the level of significance at both time points (p < 0.05) in favour of citalopram. The analysis of treatment emergent adverse events based on the UKU scale showed a higher frequency of nausea on day 14 and constipation at study end in the viloxazine group (p < 0.05) whereas reported weight gain (day 21) and concentration difficulty (day 21) were more frequently seen in the citalopram group (p < 0.05). Standard laboratory investigations and ECG analyses did not show clinically relevant abnormalities. It is concluded that antidepressant treatment with citalopram infusion followed by oral citalopram may be more efficacious than a corresponding treatment schedule with viloxazine.

Cholinergic neurotransmission seems not to be involved in depression but possibly in personality

Concordant with the adrenergic-cholinergic imbalance hypothesis of affective psychosis, there is a cholinergic supersensitivity in depression. Thus, the anticholinergic properties of some antidepressants might contribute to their efficacy. However, in the present double-blind studies (n = 20) with mianserin and viloxazine, respectively, which lack anticholinergic properties, adjunctive treatment with the anticholinergic biperiden versus placebo did not enhance the antidepressive efficacy. Therefore, we hypothesized that cholinergic supersensitivity might be linked to some possibly predisposing dimension of personality. Indeed, in healthy male volunteers (n = 11) the behavioral and cardiovascular sensitivity to physostigmine correlated significantly with "irritability" and "emotional lability" as well as with habitually passive strategies in stress coping. The rise in plasma cortisol and norepinephrine correlated with "retardation"; that of epinephrine with active coping. Thus, the cholinergic supersensitivity in affective psychoses might be linked to a personality dimension like stress sensitivity rather than to the diagnostic category itself.

Effects of administration route on pharmacokinetics of viloxazine in the rabbit

The absorption of viloxazine chlorhydrate was investigated in ten rabbits. Each animal received the drug (15 mg/kg) by three routes: intravenous, gastric and duodenal. Viloxazine plasma concentrations were low when administered by gastric and duodenal routes compared to those after intravenous injection. Concentrations to peak were 1-2 times higher after duodenal than gastric administration. Times to peak were 23.0 +/- 4.7 min after gastric administration and 9.5 +/- 5.4 min after duodenal administration. A better absorption of viloxazine after administration occurred in the duodenum than in the stomach; these results agree with viloxazine pKa = 8.13. The other pharmacokinetic parameters such as half-life, clearance and volume of distribution where the same irregardless of the administration route.

[Clinical pharmacokinetics of viloxazine chlorhydrate. Practical implications]

Pharmacokinetic data of an antidepressant agent: Apparent half-life (T1/2 elim), time of peak plasma concentration (Tmax), bioavailability, have a major contribution to determine optimal dosage in accordance with a low modification of steady-state levels. Viloxazine is a second generation antidepressant drug with a short apparent half-life (T1/2 elim: 2 to 5 h (3.4 h), which requires once a day 3 h i.v. infusion or three intakes of 100 mg oral standard formulation. The recent development of a new 300 mg slow-release form seems justified by a best compliance. Pharmacokinetic properties [Tmax = 3 to 9 h (5.2 h), T1/2 term = 6 to 7 h], suggest once a day dosage without risk of accumulation in chronic treatment. The relationships between plasma levels and the clinical improvement were not clear in literature. The recent therapeutic use of a 300 mg slow-release tablet has not permitted to change precedent findings.

Comparative pharmacokinetic study of conventional and sustained-release viloxazine in normal volunteers

Animal and human studies have indicated that viloxazine hydrochloride, an antidepressant drug with a half-life of 3-4 h in most subjects at low dosage, is rapidly and almost completely absorbed after oral administration. A sustained-release form might be useful to decrease the frequency of administration. In our study, the pharmacokinetics of sustained-release form containing 300 mg viloxazine were compared with 300 mg conventional viloxazine in 11 normal volunteers (6 women, 5 men). Wide interindividual variations were observed with respect to plasma levels, but there was no significant statistical correlation between weight and blood concentration (conventional form: Cmax = 3,599 +/- 579 ng/ml, tmax = 86 +/- 26 min; sustained-release form: Cmax = 1,917 +/- 922 ng/ml, tmax = 215 +/- 77 min). Twelve hours after administration, plasma levels ranged between 540 and 1,600 ng/ml for the conventional form and between 660 and 2,120 ng/ml for the sustained-release form. Despite the great interindividual variation this new viloxazine form appears to be of interest for one daily administration.

Carbamazepine-viloxazine interaction in patients with epilepsy

In six depressed epileptic patients stabilised on carbamazepine therapy, addition of the antidepressant agent viloxazine (300 mg/day for three weeks) induced a marked (average 55%) increase in steady-state plasma carbamazepine concentration. The concentration of the active metabolite carbamazepine-10,11-epoxide also increased during viloxazine therapy, but to a lesser extent (16%). In three patients, these effects were associated with symptoms of carbamazepine intoxication, which regressed rapidly when plasma carbamazepine and carbamazepine-10,11-epoxide levels returned to baseline values after discontinuation of viloxazine. In a seventh patient, viloxazine had to be discontinued after only two weeks because of severe side effects associated with a striking elevation of carbamazepine and carbamazepine 10,11-epoxide levels (by 197% and 137% respectively). Although viloxazine appears to be one of the few antidepressants which can be used safely in patients with epilepsy these results indicate that the drug should be prescribed with great caution in subjects treated with carbamazepine. The mechanism of the interaction probably involves inhibition of the metabolism of both carbamazepine and its active epoxide metabolite.

A clinical and pharmacological study of the antidepressant activity of viloxazine in adult and elderly patients

This work deals with the results of a clinical experience with viloxazine (VLZ) carried out on 43 depressed subjects of the female sex categorized with D.S.M. III criteria. Clinical ratings were made by means of the Hamilton Scale for depression and the Taylor self rating scale for anxiety. The results prove the efficacy of the drug in all the examined patients, along with the rapidity of effects in comparison with the tricyclic antidepressants. The elderly patients improved better than the adult subjects, especially when the depression was of the inhibited type.

Alcohol interactions with typical and atypical antidepressants

Selected parameters of central nervous system function have been examined in rabbits and mice given ethyl alcohol (ET) in combination with antidepressant drugs with different pharmacological profiles. A significant prolongation of the ET-induced loss of righting reflex was observed in mice treated with amitriptyline, 3 mg/kg, or trazodone, 8 mg/kg, injected intraperitoneally. The same drugs failed to cause narcosis when given alone to mice at doses up to 40 (amitriptyline) and 100 (trazodone) mg/kg. Rabbits given single 5 mg/kg IV doses of amitriptyline or trazodone exhibited a synchronous EEG pattern with an increase in spectrum total power that became more pronounced after IV injection of a low dose of ET (0.2 g/kg). The increase in the spectrum total power after ET was significantly greater in rabbits given trazodone than in those given amitriptyline. No significant interactive effects were observed in animals receiving combinations of ET with viloxazine, bupropion or fluvoxamine.

Behavioural changes after acute and chronic administration of typical and atypical antidepressants in rats: interactions with reserpine

Acute administration of desipramine, mianserin and viloxazine produces a significant decrease of locomotor activity in rats. Conversely, the locomotion of rats receiving the antidepressants for a prolonged period of time is not modified with respect to control animals. Moreover, the reserpine-induced decrement of locomotion is not influenced by chronic treatment with any of the antidepressants used in the present study. Since tolerance develops rapidly to these behavioural effects they may be indicative of compensatory changes in neuronal systems which may occur during prolonged antidepressant treatment.

Viloxazine and the depressed schizophrenic--methodological issues

A pilot study of a small group of schizophrenic patients manifesting symptoms of a depressive nature was treated in a double-blind study in which viloxazine or a placebo was administered in combination with either chlorpromazine or haloperidol. There appeared to be no difference between the viloxazine-treated group and the placebo-treated group, although the study raised some question as to the adequacies of the dosage utilized since there was an absence of any apparent side effects. In view of these issues concerning the clinical merit of the combination, this obviously requires further investigation.

Viloxazine plasma concentrations and clinical response

Eleven patients suffering from primary depressive illness were treated with 300 mg/d of viloxazine for 29 days. Blood samples were collected at weekly intervals and severity of depression assessed using the Hamilton depression rating scale. Mean plasma viloxazine level for all patients during the trial was 1.20 micrograms/ml and ranged from 0.40 to 2.70 micrograms/ml. No simple relationship between plasma concentration and amelioration score was observed at day (rs = -0.02), day 22 (rs = -0.29) or day 29 (rs = 0.09). No significant difference in plasma concentrations between responders and non-responders was observed at day 29. Side effects were not correlated with plasma concentrations.

Long-term administration of atropine, imipramine, and viloxazine alters responsiveness of rat cortical neurones to acetylcholine

Rats were treated daily with atropine (2.5 mg/kg), imipramine (5 mg/kg), viloxazine (5 mg/kg), or saline for 14 days. Thirty-six hours following the final injection the rats were anaesthetized with urethane and the sensitivity of neurones in the somatosensory cortex to iontophoretically applied acetylcholine (ACh) was determined. In saline-treated animals the large majority of neurones was excited by ACh with depression being observed infrequently. This was reversed in drug-treated animals, the predominant response to iontophoretic ACh becoming one of depression. The results indicate that long-term administration of antidepressant drugs may induce qualitative changes in the sensitivity of central cholinergic systems.

Acute effects of viloxazine HCl and flurazepam when given alone and in combination on sleep EEG: a double-blind interaction study with normals

Viloxazine, an aryl-oxypropanolamine type of beta-adreno-receptor antagonist, has been used in the treatment of depression. In a double-blind drug interaction study with flurazepam, a commonly used benzodiazepine hypnotic, viloxazine administered alone decreased the amount of time spent in REM sleep, increased the amount of time in the "light" stages of sleep, and increased the number of transitions to awake. However, no interactive effects of the combined administration of viloxazine and flurazepam could be detected.

A double-blind trial: vivalan against placebo in depressed elderly patients

A double-blind controlled study of viloxazine against placebo in elderly depressed patients with a primary diagnosis of depressive illness records statistically significant improvements in depression ratings in the viloxazine group after three weeks. Viloxazine was effective and well tolerated at doses of 100 to 200 mg in depressed elderly patients, several of whom had concurrent cardiac disease.

Relationship between blood and cerebrospinal levels of the antidepressant agent viloxazine

Viloxazine levels in blood and CSF have been measured following acute and chronic dosing in depressed patients. Blood profiles confirm previous findings that viloxazine is rapidly absorbed and eliminated with a half-life of 4.5 h. Viloxazine crosses the blood-brain barrier and concentrations in CSF remain virtually unchanged over a ten hour period post administration. Viloxazine does not accumulate in CSF on chronic administration. The fact that CSF levels do not reflect concentrations in blood has significant implications on any attempt to correlate the clinical efficacy and the pharmacokinetic behaviour of an antidepressant agent.

Drug dependence potential of viloxazine hydrochloride tested in rhesus monkeys

The drug dependence potential of viloxazine was tested in 5 experiments on rhesus monkeys. In gross behavioral observation of normal monkeys the acute CNS effects of the drug were found to be very weak. Decrement of spontaneous motor activity and occasional eye-closing were observed with single doses higher than 16 mg/kg IV, IM and 128 mg/kg PO, while convulsions and death occured at 64 mg/kg IV and IM. Viloxazine did not suppress the morphine and barbital withdrawal signs in monkeys that had been made physically dependent on these drugs and withdrawal. In the test for physical dependence by repeated administration of the drug at 16 mg/kg IM twice daily for 31 days in normal monkeys, no observable withdrawal sign was developed in the naloxone precipitation and natural withdrawal tests. In intravenous self-administration experiments, a weak reinforcing effect was demonstrated in some monkeys, but the effect was extremely weak. Thus, viloxazine was found to be physical dependence-free and its overall dependence potential was regarded as very low.

Comparison of Vivalan (viloxazine hydrochloride) with imipramine in the treatment of depression. A double-blind study

Twenty-eight hospitalized patients with depressive illness entered a double-blind trial to compare viloxazine hydrochloride (Vivalan) with imipramine. Both drugs produced a statistically significant improvement in the depressive symptoms as early as the 7th day, measured by the HRS. A side effects check-list showed no significant difference between Vivalan and imipramine. A lack of anticholinergic effects was noted in the Vivalan group although upper gastro-intestinal side effects were more frequent. Two patients in the Vivalan group withdrew due to gastric symptoms.