What are the optimal pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic targets for β-lactamase inhibitors? A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) indices are widely used for the selection of optimum antibiotic doses. For β-lactam antibiotics, fT>MIC, best relates antibiotic exposure to efficacy and is widely used to guide the dosing of β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor (BLI) combinations, often without considering any PK/PD exposure requirements for BLIs.

OBJECTIVES

This systematic review aimed to describe the PK/PD exposure requirements of BLIs for optimal microbiological efficacy when used in combination with β-lactam antibiotics.

METHODS

Literature was searched online through PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus and Cochrane Library databases up to 5 June 2023. Studies that report the PK/PD index and threshold concentration of BLIs approved for clinical use were included. Narrative data synthesis was carried out to assimilate the available evidence.

RESULTS

Twenty-three studies were included. The PK/PD index that described the efficacy of BLIs was fT>CT for tazobactam, avibactam and clavulanic acid and fAUC0-24/MIC for relebactam and vaborbactam. The optimal magnitude of the PK/PD index is variable for each BLI based on the companion β-lactam antibiotics, type of bacteria and β-lactamase enzyme gene transcription levels.

CONCLUSIONS

The PK/PD index that describes the efficacy of BLIs and the exposure measure required for their efficacy is variable among inhibitors; as a result, it is difficult to make clear inference on what the optimum index is. Further PK/PD profiling of BLI, using preclinical infection models that simulate the anticipated mode(s) of clinical use, is warranted to streamline the exposure targets for use in the optimization of dosing regimens.

Balancing the scales: achieving the optimal beta-lactam to beta-lactamase inhibitor ratio with continuous infusion piperacillin/tazobactam against extended spectrum beta-lactamase producing Enterobacterales

Piperacillin/tazobactam (TZP) is administered intravenously in a fixed ratio (8:1) with the potential for inadequate tazobactam exposure to ensure piperacillin activity against Enterobacterales. Adult patients receiving continuous infusion (CI) of TZP and therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of both agents were evaluated. Demographic variables and other pertinent laboratory data were collected retrospectively. A population pharmacokinetic approach was used to select the best kidney function model predictive of TZP clearance (CL). The probability of target attainment (PTA), cumulative fraction of response (CFR) and the ratio between piperacillin and tazobactam were computed to identify optimal dosage regimens by continuous infusion across kidney function. This study included 257 critically ill patients (79.3% male) with intra-abdominal, bloodstream, and hospital-acquired pneumonia infections in 89.5% as the primary indication. The median (min-max range) age, body weight, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were 66 (23-93) years, 75 (39-310) kg, and 79.2 (6.4-234) mL/min, respectively. Doses of up to 22.5 g/day were used to optimize TZP based on TDM. The 2021 chronic kidney disease epidemiology equation in mL/min best modeled TZP CL. The ratio of piperacillin:tazobactam increased from 6:1 to 10:1 between an eGFR of <20 mL/min and >120 mL/min. At conventional doses, the PTA is below 90% when eGFR is ≥100 mL/min. Daily doses of 18 g/day and 22.5 g/day by CI are expected to achieve a >80% CFR when eGFR is 100-120 mL/min and >120-160 mL/min, respectively. Inadequate piperacillin and tazobactam exposure is likely in patients with eGFR ≥ 100 mL/min. Dose regimen adjustments informed by TDM should be evaluated in this specific population.

Pharmacokinetics of Ceftazidime-Avibactam in Combination with Aztreonam (COMBINE) in a Phase 1, Open-Label Study of Healthy Adults

Scant pharmacokinetic (PK) data are available on ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) and aztreonam (ATM) in combination, and it is unknown if CZA-ATM exacerbates alanine aminotransferase (ALT)/aspartate aminotransferase (AST) elevations relative to ATM alone. This phase 1 study sought to describe the PK of CZA-ATM and assess the associations between ATM exposures and ALT/AST elevations. Subjects (n = 48) were assigned to one of six cohorts (intermittent infusion [II] CZA, continuous infusion [CI] CZA, II ATM, CI ATM [8 g/daily], II CZA with II ATM [6 g/daily], and II CZA with II ATM [8 g/daily]), and study product(s) were administered for 7 days. A total of 19 subjects (40%) had ALT/AST elevations, and most (89%) occurred in the ATM/CZA-ATM cohorts. Two subjects in the CI ATM cohort experienced severe ALT/AST elevations, which halted the study. All subjects with ALT/AST elevations were asymptomatic with no other signs of liver injury, and all ALT/AST elevations resolved without sequalae after cessation of dosing. In the population PK (PopPK) analyses, CZA-ATM administration reduced total ATM clearance by 16%, had a negligible effect on total ceftazidime clearance, and was not a covariate in the avibactam PopPK model. In the exposure-response analyses, coadministration of CZA-ATM was not found to augment ALT/AST elevations. Modest associations were observed between ATM exposure (maximum concentration of drug in serum [Cmax] and area under the concentration-time curve [AUC]) and ALT/AST elevations in the analysis of subjects in the II ATM/CZA-ATM cohorts. The findings suggest that administration of CZA-ATM reduces ATM clearance but does not exacerbate AST/ALT elevations relative to ATM alone. The results also indicate that CI ATM should be used with caution.

Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling and Probability of Pharmacodynamic Target Attainment for Ceftazidime-Avibactam in Pediatric Patients Aged 3 Months and Older

Increasing prevalence of infections caused by antimicrobial-resistant gram-negative bacteria represents a global health crisis, and while several novel therapies that target various aspects of antimicrobial resistance have been introduced in recent years, few are currently approved for children. Ceftazidime-avibactam is a novel β-lactam β-lactamase inhibitor combination approved for adults and children 3 months and older with complicated intra-abdominal infection, and complicated urinary tract infection or hospital-acquired ventilator-associated pneumonia (adults only in the United States) caused by susceptible gram-negative bacteria. Extensive population pharmacokinetic (PK) data sets for ceftazidime and avibactam obtained during the adult clinical development program were used to iteratively select, modify, and validate the approved adult dosage regimen (2,000-500 mg by 2-hour intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 hours (q8h), with adjustments for renal function). Following the completion of one phase I (NCT01893346) and two phase II ceftazidime-avibactam studies (NCT02475733 and NCT02497781) in children, adult PK data sets were updated with pediatric PK data. This paper describes the development of updated combined adult and pediatric population PK models and their application in characterizing the population PK of ceftazidime and avibactam in children, and in dose selection for further pediatric evaluation. The updated models supported the approval of ceftazidime-avibactam pediatric dosage regimens (all by 2-hour IV infusion) of 50-12.5 mg/kg (maximum 2,000-500 mg) q8h for those ≥6 months to 18 years old, and 40-10 mg/kg q8h for those ≥3 to 6 months old with creatinine clearance > 50 mL/min/1.73 m2 .

New β-Lactam-β-Lactamase Inhibitor Combinations

The limited armamentarium against drug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli has led to the development of several novel β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor combinations (BLBLIs). In this review, we summarize their spectrum of in vitro activities, mechanisms of resistance, and pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) characteristics. A summary of available clinical data is provided per drug. Four approved BLBLIs are discussed in detail. All are options for treating multidrug-resistant (MDR) Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa Ceftazidime-avibactam is a potential drug for treating Enterobacterales producing extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL), Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC), AmpC, and some class D β-lactamases (OXA-48) in addition to carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Ceftolozane-tazobactam is a treatment option mainly for carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa (non-carbapenemase producing), with some activity against ESBL-producing Enterobacterales Meropenem-vaborbactam has emerged as treatment option for Enterobacterales producing ESBL, KPC, or AmpC, with similar activity as meropenem against P. aeruginosa Imipenem-relebactam has documented activity against Enterobacterales producing ESBL, KPC, and AmpC, with the combination having some additional activity against P. aeruginosa relative to imipenem. None of these drugs present in vitro activity against Enterobacterales or P. aeruginosa producing metallo-β-lactamase (MBL) or against carbapenemase-producing Acinetobacter baumannii Clinical data regarding the use of these drugs to treat MDR bacteria are limited and rely mostly on nonrandomized studies. An overview on eight BLBLIs in development is also provided. These drugs provide various levels of in vitro coverage of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales, with several drugs presenting in vitro activity against MBLs (cefepime-zidebactam, aztreonam-avibactam, meropenem-nacubactam, and cefepime-taniborbactam). Among these drugs, some also present in vitro activity against carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa (cefepime-zidebactam and cefepime-taniborbactam) and A. baumannii (cefepime-zidebactam and sulbactam-durlobactam).

A Population Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamic Approach To Optimize Tazobactam Activity in Critically Ill Patients

The percentage of the time that the free drug concentration remains above a concentration threshold (%fT > concentration threshold) has frequently been identified to be the optimal pharmacokinetic (PK)-pharmacodynamic (PD) target of interest for tazobactam using in vitro infection models. Similar in vitro models suggested that an 85% fT > concentration threshold of 2 μg/ml for tazobactam is required to demonstrate a 2-log10-unit decrease in the number of CFU per milliliter from that at the baseline at 24 h for high-level β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli strains. The objective of this study was to characterize the tazobactam concentrations in a cohort of critically ill patients with Gram-negative bacterial infections, determine if traditional dosing regimens achieve a prespecified PK/PD target of an 80% fT > concentration threshold of 2 μg/ml, and propose alternative dosing regimens. Hospitalized critically ill adult patients receiving piperacillin-tazobactam (TZP) for a culture-positive Gram-negative bacterial infection were eligible to consent for study inclusion. Two blood samples were drawn, one during the midpoint of the dosing interval and one at the time of the trough concentration once the patient achieved PK steady state. A population PK model was developed using Phoenix NLME (v8.1) software to characterize the observed concentration-time profile of tazobactam, explore potential covariates to explain the variability in the clearance and volume parameters, and to simulate potential dosing regimens that would achieve the PK/PD target. The PK of tazobactam were adequately described by a one-compartment model with first-order elimination in 18 patients who provided consent. The final model incorporated creatinine clearance as a covariate on clearance. Simulations demonstrated target attainments of less than 50% for tazobactam using traditional dosing regimens (4/0.5 g over 30 min every 6 h). Target attainments of greater than 75% were achieved when using extended infusion times of 4 to 6 h or when administering TZP as a continuous infusion (16/2 g over 24 h). Traditional tazobactam dosing regimens fail to achieve conservative PK/PD targets in critically ill patients. Increases in the tazobactam dose or prolongation of the infusion rate may be warranted to achieve activity against β-lactamase-producing Gram-negative bacteria.

Single-Center Evaluation of the Pharmacokinetics of WCK 5222 (Cefepime-Zidebactam Combination) in Subjects with Renal Impairment

WCK 5222 is a novel β-lactam-β-lactam-enhancer combination of cefepime (FEP) and zidebactam (ZID). ZID is a novel β-lactam enhancer with a dual action of binding to Gram-negative penicillin-binding protein 2 (PBP2) and β-lactamase inhibition. WCK 5222 is being developed as a new therapeutic option for the treatment of complicated multidrug-resistant Gram-negative pathogen infections. We investigated the effect of renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety of WCK 5222 in 48 subjects based on Cockcroft-Gault-estimated creatinine clearance (CLCR). We enrolled mild (n = 6; CLCR, 60 to <90 ml/min), moderate (n = 6; CLCR, 30 to <60 ml/min), and severe (n = 6; CLCR, <30 ml/min; not on dialysis) impairment, end-stage renal disease (ESRD) on hemodialysis (HD) (n = 6), and matched normal controls (n = 24; CLCR, ≥90 ml/min). Healthy control subjects and mild and moderate renal impairment subjects received a single 60-min intravenous (i.v.) infusion of 3 g WCK 5222 (2 g FEP/1 g ZID); severe renal impairment and HD subjects received a single 60-min i.v. infusion of 1.5 g WCK 5222 (1 g FEP plus 0.5 g ZID). Body and renal clearance decreased, and plasma half-life (t1/2) and the area under the concentration-time curve from time zero extrapolated to infinity (AUC0-∞ [h µg/ml]) increased in a graded relationship with severity of renal impairment for both FEP and ZID. Our findings suggest that dose adjustments for WCK 5222 will be required according to the degree of renal impairment. Overall, WCK 5222 (FEP-ZID) was found to be safe and well tolerated in subjects with normal and impaired renal function. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT02942810.).

Relative Oral Bioavailability of Two Amoxicillin-Clavulanic Acid Formulations in Healthy Dogs: A Pilot Study

The use of human generic amoxicillin-clavulanic acid formulations in veterinary medicine is currently lacking supportive evidence. This pilot study was conducted to determine preliminary pharmacokinetic parameters and relative oral bioavailability of a human generic and veterinary proprietary 4:1 amoxicillin-clavulanic acid formulation in healthy dogs to evaluate whether drug exposure was similar and to determine if further comparative investigation is warranted. Each dog received a single oral dose of each formulation containing 500:125 mg of amoxicillin-clavulanic acid at two separate instances with a 2 wk washout period between product administration. Following drug administration, blood was collected at fixed times over 24 hr to measure plasma amoxicillin and clavulanic acid concentrations using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. There were no statistically significant differences between pharmacokinetic parameters of either formulation. Clavulanic acid showed greater between-dog variation in drug exposure between formulations compared with amoxicillin and was also observed to be more variable within the veterinary proprietary formulation. The average relative oral bioavailability was 98.2% (23.6% coefficient of variation) for amoxicillin and 152.6% (64.3% coefficient of variation) for clavulanic acid between formulations. This pilot investigation supports the need for further bioequivalence studies regarding these formulations before commenting on product interchangeability.

General Method to Determine the Flux of Charged Molecules through Nanopores Applied to β-Lactamase Inhibitors and OmpF

A major challenge in the discovery of the new antibiotics against Gram-negative bacteria is to achieve sufficiently fast permeation in order to avoid high doses causing toxic side effects. So far, suitable assays for quantifying the uptake of charged antibiotics into bacteria are lacking. We apply an electrophysiological zero-current assay using concentration gradients of β-lactamase inhibitors combined with single-channel conductance to quantify their flux rates through OmpF. Molecular dynamic simulations provide in addition details on the interactions between the nanopore wall and the charged solutes. In particular, the interaction barrier for three β-lactamase inhibitors is surprisingly as low as 3-5 kcal/mol and only slightly above the diffusion barrier of ions such as chloride. Within our macroscopic constant field model, we determine that at a zero-membrane potential a concentration gradient of 10 μM of avibactam, sulbactam, or tazobactam can create flux rates of roughly 620 molecules/s per OmpF trimer.

The pharmacodynamics of avibactam in combination with ceftaroline or ceftazidime against β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae studied in an in vitro model of infection

Objectives

Pharmacodynamics of β-lactamase inhibitors are an area of intense interest as new β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations enter clinical development and clinical practice. Avibactam, a non-β-lactam β-lactamase inhibitor, has been combined with ceftaroline or ceftazidime but these two combinations have not been directly compared.

Methods

Using an in vitro pharmacokinetic model we simulated human drug concentration-time courses associated with ceftaroline 600 mg every 8 h and ceftazidime 2000 mg every 8 h. Avibactam was given by continuous infusion at a range of concentrations up to 10 mg/L and antibacterial effect assessed against a CTX-M-producing Escherichia coli , AmpC-hyperproducing Enterobacter cloacae and KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae. Simulations were performed over 72 h.

Results

Avibactam, at a concentration of 1-2 mg/L, produced maximum bacterial clearance over 72 h for the E. coli and E. cloacae strains with both ceftaroline and ceftazidime. Avibactam (4 mg/L) was required for maximum reduction in bacterial load with the KPC-producing K. pneumoniae. A series of dose fractionation experiments were performed with avibactam against each of the three strains and AUC, C max or T  >   avibactam concentration of 1, 2 or 4 mg/L related to antibacterial effect as measured by change in bacterial count at 24 h. AUC or C max were best related to 24 h antibacterial effect for avibactam though there was no consistent pattern favouring one over the other.

Conclusions

As AUC is a much easier and more reliable pharmacokinetic measure than C max , it would be useful to explore how AUC-based indices for avibactam exposures could be used for translating the results of the present study into patients' therapy.

Variability of piperacillin concentrations in relation to tazobactam concentrations in critically ill patients

Therapeutic drug monitoring for critically ill patients receiving piperacillin/tazobactam is described as a useful tool. However, the minimum inhibitory concentration of piperacillin depends on a sufficiently high concentration of tazobactam in case of β-lactamase-producing strains. Therefore, the relationship between piperacillin and tazobactam concentrations was assessed in a heterogeneous group of critically ill patients. Sixty patients with severe infections receiving 4.5 g of piperacillin/tazobactam 2-3 times daily by intermittent infusion were included in this prospective observational study (NCT01793012). Over 4 days, multiple serum samples were obtained to determine the total piperacillin and tazobactam concentrations. The target ranges were defined as trough levels >16 mg/L (>22.5 mg/L) and >4 mg/L (>5.7 mg/L) for the calculated unbound concentrations (measured total concentrations) of piperacillin and tazobactam, respectively. Despite a high correlation coefficient (r = 0.93) comparing piperacillin and tazobactam trough levels, the piperacillin/tazobactam quotients varied between ca. 1 and 10. From linear regression analysis of piperacillin versus tazobactam values, it follows that a piperacillin trough level of 22.5 mg/L might be associated with tazobactam trough levels ranging from 1.5 mg/L to 10.1 mg/L. A 70 mg/L threshold for total piperacillin trough levels would be necessary to ensure that tazobactam concentrations are >5.7 mg/L. Because of the observed variability of piperacillin/tazobactam quotients, defining the total piperacillin target range ≥70 mg/L might be useful to ensure that tazobactam concentrations do not fall below 5.7 mg/L. Further studies are necessary to confirm that the used therapeutic ranges are associated with optimal outcomes in critically ill patients.

Ceftazidime/Avibactam and Ceftolozane/Tazobactam: Second-generation β-Lactam/β-Lactamase Inhibitor Combinations

Ceftolozane/tazobactam and ceftazidime/avibactam are 2 novel β-lactam/β-lactamase combination antibiotics. The antimicrobial spectrum of activity of these antibiotics includes multidrug-resistant (MDR) gram-negative bacteria (GNB), including Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Ceftazidime/avibactam is also active against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae that produce Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemases. However, avibactam does not inactivate metallo-β-lactamases such as New Delhi metallo-β-lactamases. Both ceftolozane/tazobactam and ceftazidime/avibactam are only available as intravenous formulations and are dosed 3 times daily in patients with normal renal function. Clinical trials showed noninferiority to comparators of both agents when used in the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections and complicated intra-abdominal infections (when used with metronidazole). Results from pneumonia studies have not yet been reported. In summary, ceftolozane/tazobactam and ceftazidime/avibactam are 2 new second-generation cephalosporin/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations. After appropriate trials are conducted, they may prove useful in the treatment of MDR GNB infections. Antimicrobial stewardship will be essential to preserve the activity of these agents.

Pharmacokinetics-Pharmacodynamics of a Novel β-Lactamase Inhibitor, CB-618, in Combination with Meropenem in an In Vitro Infection Model

The usefulness of β-lactam antimicrobial agents is threatened as never before by β-lactamase-producing bacteria. For this reason, there has been renewed interest in the development of broad-spectrum β-lactamase inhibitors. Herein we describe the results of dose fractionation and dose-ranging studies carried out using a one-compartment in vitro infection model to determine the exposure measure for CB-618, a novel β-lactamase inhibitor, most predictive of the efficacy when given in combination with meropenem. The challenge panel included Enterobacteriaceae clinical isolates, which collectively produced a wide range of β-lactamase enzymes (KPC-2, KPC-3, FOX-5, OXA-48, SHV-11, SHV-27, and TEM-1). Human concentration-time profiles were simulated for each drug, and samples were collected for drug concentration and bacterial density determinations. Using data from dose fractionation studies and a challenge Klebsiella pneumoniae isolate (CB-618-potentiated meropenem MIC = 1 mg/liter), relationships between change from baseline in log10 CFU/ml at 24 h and each of CB-618 area under the concentration-time curve over 24 h (AUC0-24), maximum concentration (Cmax), and percentage of the dosing interval that CB-618 concentrations remained above a given threshold were evaluated in combination with meropenem at 2 g every 8 h (q8h). The exposure measures most closely associated with CB-618 efficacy in combination with meropenem were the CB-618 AUC0-24 (r(2) = 0.835) and Cmax (r(2) = 0.826). Using the CB-618 AUC0-24 indexed to the CB-618-potentiated meropenem MIC value, the relationship between change from baseline in log10 CFU/ml at 24 h and CB-618 AUC0-24/MIC ratio in combination with meropenem was evaluated using the pooled data from five challenge isolates; the CB-618 AUC0-24/MIC ratio associated with net bacterial stasis and the 1- and 2-log10 CFU/ml reductions from baseline at 24 h were 27.3, 86.1, and 444.8, respectively. These data provide a pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics (PK-PD) basis for evaluating potential CB-618 dosing regimens in combination with meropenem in future studies.