Oyama M, Tamura H, Hidaka Y, Furuie K, Kuraoka S. Renal arteriovenous fistula discovered ~2 years after renal biopsy: A case report.
Clin Case Rep 2023;
11:e7538. [PMID:
37334343 PMCID:
PMC10276242 DOI:
10.1002/ccr3.7538]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2023] [Revised: 05/09/2023] [Accepted: 06/02/2023] [Indexed: 06/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Key Clinical Message
Although percutaneous renal biopsy is considered safe, this invasive procedure has complications such as renal arteriovenous fistula (RAVF). Even if complications such as RAVFs are not observed early after renal biopsy, considering the possibility of delayed renal hemorrhage, follow-up with ultrasound after renal biopsy even in asymptomatic cases could be important.
Abstract
Although percutaneous renal biopsy is considered safe, this invasive procedure can lead to complications such as renal arteriovenous fistula (RAVF). RAVF occurs when some arteries and veins communicate in the absence of capillaries in the renal hilum or renal parenchyma. It was previously thought to be relatively rare; however, with advances in imaging diagnostics, it is sometimes found asymptomatically. In addition, renal biopsy is the most common cause of acquired RAVF. In this case, RAVF was discovered 2 years after renal biopsy. Late-onset RAVF is scarce. This case highlights that even if complications such as RAVFs are not observed early after renal biopsy, considering the possibility of delayed RAVF, follow-up with ultrasound could be important.
Collapse