Cao J, Xu H, Li W, Guo Z, Lin Y, Shi Y, Hu W, Ba Y, Li S, Li Z, Wang K, Wu J, He Y, Yang J, Xie C, Zhou F, Song X, Chen G, Ma W, Luo S, Chen Z, Cong M, Ma H, Zhou C, Wang W, Qi Luo, Shi Y, Qi Y, Jiang H, Guan W, Chen J, Chen J, Fang Y, Zhou L, Feng Y, Tan R, Ou J, Zhao Q, Wu J, Xin Lin, Yang L, Fu Z, Wang C, Deng L, Li T, Song C, Shi H. Nutritional assessment and risk factors associated to malnutrition in patients with esophageal cancer.
Curr Probl Cancer 2021;
45:100638. [PMID:
32829957 DOI:
10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2020.100638]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2020] [Revised: 05/25/2020] [Accepted: 07/17/2020] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION
Esophageal cancer is the fourth most common cause of cancer death in China. Patients with esophageal cancer are more likely to suffer from malnutrition. The purpose of this study is to assess nutritional status of patients with esophageal cancer from multiple perspectives and analyze the risk factors.
METHODS
A total of 1482 esophageal cancer patients were enrolled in the study. We investigated the Scored Patient Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) scores, NRS-2002 scores, Karnofsky performance status scores, anthropometric, and laboratory indicators of patients. Unconditional logistic regression analysis was applied to identify the risk factors of nutritional status.
RESULTS
PG-SGA (≥4) and NRS-2002 (≥3) showed the incidence of malnutrition were 76% and 50%, respectively. In the patients with PG-SGA score ≥4, the proportion of patients who did not receive any nutritional support was 60%. The incidence of malnutrition in females was significantly higher than that in males. Besides, abnormality rates of Red blood cell (P < 0.001), MAC (P = 0.037), and MAMC (P < 0.001) in males was significantly higher than that in females, while abnormality rates of TSF (P < 0.001) was lower than that in females. After adjusted with the other potential risk factors listed, unconditional logistic regression analysis indicated smoking (odds ratio: 2.868, 95% confidence interval: 1.660-4.954), drinking (OR: 1.726, 95% CI: 1.099-2.712), family history (OR: 1.840, 95% CI: 1.132-2.992), radiotherapy or chemotherapy (OR: 1.594, 95% CI: 1.065-2.387), and pathological stage (OR: 2.263, 95% CI: 1.084-4.726) might be the risk factors of nutritional status, while nutritional support can reduce the risk of malnutrition.
CONCLUSION
Effective nutritional risk assessment methods and nutritional intervention measures can be adopted according to the research data to improve quality of life of esophageal cancer patients.
Collapse