Takemoto T, Sasaki N, Tada M, Yanai H, Okita K. Evaluation of peptic ulcer healing with a highly magnifying endoscope: potential prognostic and therapeutic implications.
J Clin Gastroenterol 1991;
13 Suppl 1:S125-8. [PMID:
1940187 DOI:
10.1097/00004836-199112001-00020]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Gastric and duodenal ulcer healing and scarring were evaluated with a highly magnifying endoscope. The appearance of scar was classified into three types: Sa, with a depression at the center; Sb, with a pattern of regenerated mucosa reaching the center; and Sc, with a uniform pattern throughout. The relationship between regenerative mucosal patterns and histologic findings of biopsy specimens was investigated in 58 patients with gastric ulcer. Mucosal regeneration was sufficient in 26.7% of patients with Sa pattern, 79.2% of patients with Sb pattern, and 100% with Sc pattern. From prospective endoscopic follow-up observations, the relationship between endoscopic findings of ulcer scars and ulcer relapses was investigated in 80 patients with gastric ulcer and 56 patients with duodenal ulcer. As a result, patients who completed the cycle of ulcer healing from Sa pattern through Sb to Sc patterns had rarely relapse. In contrast, patients with a Sa pattern of mucosal scar showed a high rate of recurrence: 88.8% for gastric ulcer, and 88.0% for duodenal ulcer. Our method of evaluation of gastric and duodenal ulcer healing with a highly magnifying endoscope may have important prognostic and therapeutic implications. It may indicate a population of patients (with Sa scarring pattern) with a high risk of ulcer recurrence and therefore requiring prolonged prophylactic treatment.
Collapse