Nicolau-Raducu R, Cohen AJ, Bokhari A, Bohorquez H, Bruce D, Carmody I, Bugeaud E, Seal J, Sonnier D, Nossaman B, Loss G. Predictive model and risk factors associated with a revised definition of early allograft dysfunction in liver transplant recipients.
Clin Transplant 2017;
31. [PMID:
28856732 DOI:
10.1111/ctr.13097]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/17/2017] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION
Early allograft dysfunction (EAD) is a well-defined clinical syndrome that reflects overall graft function within the first week after transplant. The aim of this study was to further refine the definition for EAD.
METHOD
In this study, 1124 patients were included for analysis. Logistic regression was performed to identify markers of liver injury associated with 6-month patient and graft failure.
RESULTS
Recursive partitioning identified cut-points for ALT/AST > 3000/6000 IU/dL observed within first week, with bilirubin ≥ 10 mg/dL and INR ≥ 1.6 on postoperative day 7 for the revised EAD model. The incidence of updated EAD was 15% (164/1124). Multivariable analysis identified eight risk factors associated with EAD: % macrosteatosis, donor location, donor weight, nonheart beating donors, type of organ transplanted, recipient-associated hepatocellular carcinoma, severity of postreperfusion syndrome, and the amount of transfused fresh frozen plasma. In the presence of EAD, the incidence of post-transplant renal replacement therapy and dialysis dependence increases. There was a significant association of the presence of EAD with 6-month mortality (12% vs 3%) and 6-month graft failure (8% vs 1%).
CONCLUSION
Higher AST/ALT level needed as cutoff in comparison with the old EAD definition.
Collapse