Rosiglitazone short-term monotherapy lowers fasting and post-prandial glucose in patients with type II diabetes

Rosiglitazone improves insulin sensitivity, glucose tolerance and ambulatory blood pressure in subjects with impaired glucose tolerance

AIMS

To determine the effects of rosiglitazone on insulin sensitivity, glucose tolerance and ambulatory blood pressure when administered to subjects with persistent impaired glucose tolerance (IGT).

METHODS

Eighteen subjects with persistent IGT were randomized to receive rosiglitazone 4 mg twice daily or matching placebo for 12 weeks. Evaluation at baseline and at the end of treatment included measurement of whole body insulin sensitivity during a euglycaemic hyperinsulinaemic clamp and deriving an insulin sensitivity index. Changes in glucose and insulin concentration were determined after oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and mixed meal tolerance tests, and 24-h ambulatory blood pressure was monitored.

RESULTS

Rosiglitazone significantly improved the insulin sensitivity index by 2.26 micro g/kg per min per pmol/l relative to placebo (P = 0.0003). Four of nine subjects receiving rosiglitazone reverted to normal glucose tolerance and 5/9 remained IGT, although four of these had improved 2-h glucose values. In the placebo group, 1/9 subjects progressed to Type 2 diabetes and 8/9 remained IGT. Following OGTT and meal tolerance test, glucose and insulin area under curve were reduced over 3 and 4 h, respectively. Compared with placebo, ambulatory blood pressure decreased significantly in the rosiglitazone group by 10 mmHg systolic (P = 0.0066) and 8 mmHg diastolic (P = 0.0126).

CONCLUSIONS

Consistent with its effects in patients with Type 2 diabetes, rosiglitazone substantially improved whole body insulin sensitivity and the glycaemic and insulinaemic responses to an OGTT and meal tolerance test in subjects with persistent IGT. Furthermore, rosiglitazone reduced systolic and diastolic ambulatory blood pressure in these subjects.

Management of co-existing diabetes mellitus and dyslipidemia: defining the role of thiazolidinediones

The observed reduction in macrovascular outcomes in the United Kingdom Progressive Diabetes Study (UKPDS) trial in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM), treated intensively with insulin or sulfonylureas, was of borderline significance (p = 0.052). This may be because of the role of factors other than glycemic control in the etiology of macrovascular disease. The UKPDS and other studies have suggested that lipid parameters are potent predictors of adverse outcomes in patients with type 2 DM. In patients with DM, dyslipidemia is characterized by elevated serum triglycerides and low high density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) with normal total serum cholesterol levels and usually accompanied by an elevation of atherogenic, small, dense low density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) particles. Dyslipidemia is only partly corrected by dietary and lifestyle modifications and pharmacological glycemic control in patients with DM. Several guidelines, including those published by the New Zealand Heart Foundation, suggest that lipid-modifying therapies are appropriate in patients considered to be at high or very high risk of a cardiac event. This includes patients with established vascular disease. Some recent studies suggest that patients with type 2 DM have risk comparable to patients without DM, but have experienced previous myocardial infarction (MI). Subgroup analysis of trials including the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S) and Cholesterol and Recurrent Events (CARE), which included patients with DM, have shown a significant reduction in adverse outcomes, although many patients with DM and dyslipidemia were excluded. Of lipid-lowering drugs, fibric acid derivatives are probably the most appropriate for patients with DM and dyslipidemia and their role is being evaluated in large, long-term outcome studies such as Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes (FIELD). Thiazolidinediones, a new class of compound for treating patients with type 2 DM, primarily exert their glucose-lowering effect by increasing insulin sensitivity at the level of skeletal muscle, and to a lesser extent, at the liver by decreasing hepatic glucose output. Some of their actions are mediated through binding and activation of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma, a nuclear receptor that has a regulatory role in differentiation of cells, especially adipocytes. The nonhypoglycemic effects of thiazolidinediones, therefore, offer additional potential mechanisms for benefit in patients with type 2 DM and insulin resistance. Thiazolidinediones increase serum HDL-C levels. Troglitazone and pioglitazone have been shown to decrease serum triglyceride levels. Rosiglitazone, conversely has no significant effect on serum triglyceride levels. All of the thiazolidinediones increase serum LDL-C levels (pioglitazone to a lesser extent), although changes in the size of the LDL fraction may render it less susceptible to oxidation and, therefore, less atherogenic. A randomized comparative trial needs to be undertaken to determine whether true differences exist between the thiazolidinediones. Longer studies need to be undertaken to assess their effect on cardiovascular outcomes.

Durability of glycemic control: a feature of the thiazolidinediones

Type 2 diabetes is a rapidly growing disorder that affects millions of Americans. It usually results from a combination of insulin resistance and a beta-cell secretory defect leading to hyperglycemia and microvascular and macrovascular complications, including cardiovascular disease. With the increasing number of options available for the treatment of type 2 diabetes, it can be difficult to determine which medication to prescribe for each patient. Ideally, an agent that effectively lowers glucose concentrations while also minimizing disease progression should be chosen. The thiazolidinediones (TZDs), a relatively newer class of antidiabetic agents, have been shown to be efficacious in lowering glucose concentrations, maintaining glycemic control, and improving other cardiovascular risk factors. These include reduction of visceral adiposity, alteration of lipoprotein concentrations with a favorable distribution of cholesterol subfractions, and decreasing markers of inflammation and endothelial dysfunction. Overall, the TZDs appear to be a promising therapeutic option for consistent control of glucose levels and may slow the progression of type 2 diabetes.

The effects of oral anti-hyperglycaemic medications on serum lipid profiles in patients with type 2 diabetes

AIM

Patients with type 2 diabetes often have dyslipidaemia, putting them at risk of cardiovascular disease, and are frequently treated with oral anti-hyperglycaemic medications (OAMs). This review compares the effects of OAMs on serum lipids [total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), triglycerides (TGs) and free fatty acids (FFAs)] in patients with type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

medline was searched for entries indexed from January 1966 to November 2002; search terms included the names of OAMs and serum lipids, limited to English language and human subjects. We selected clinical studies in type 2 diabetes of OAM monotherapy that included serum lipid data, treated all patients in a treatment group with the same drug, used therapeutic OAM doses not higher than the maximum recommended in the USA, compared therapy with baseline or placebo and specified statistical tests used. One unblinded investigator selected studies for inclusion. Data reported include number of patients, study length, OAM dose, serum lipid data at baseline and endpoint, p-values and statistical tests.

RESULTS

Data on the serum lipid effects of sulphonylureas, repaglinide, nateglinide and miglitol were inconclusive. Acarbose increased HDL-C and decreased LDL-C and voglibose reduced TC. Metformin at higher doses reduced TC; data on its effects on other lipids were inconclusive. Rosiglitazone increased LDL-C, HDL-C and TC and reduced FFAs but had no effect on TGs. Pioglitazone increased HDL-C and reduced TGs and FFAs but did not affect LDL-C or TC.

CONCLUSIONS

Lipid changes as a result of improved glycaemic control are not uniform findings associated with anti-diabetic therapy. Only metformin, acarbose, voglibose, rosiglitazone and pioglitazone had significant effects on the lipid profile. These effects should be considered when selecting OAMs for patients with type 2 diabetes.

Progress with thiazolidinediones in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND

Much progress has been made in the field of medicine within the past 20 years; however, cardiovascular outcomes in patients with diabetes mellitus have not improved to a corresponding degree. Although numerous treatments are available for the management of type 2 diabetes, current approaches appear to address the spectrum of the disease and its complications insufficiently.

OBJECTIVES

This article reviews evidence for the minimal effects of standard antidiabetic treatments on the macrovascular complications associated with type 2 diabetes, discusses the improvements in markers of cardiovascular risk seen with the thiazolidinediones (TZDs), and explores the rationale for their earlier use.

METHODS

Relevant articles and guidelines on the use of oral antidiabetic agents in the treatment of type 2 diabetes were identified through a search of MEDLINE for the past 15 years using the terms cardiovascular, insulin resistance, metabolic syndrome, metformin, sulfonylurea, type 2 diabetes, and thiazolidinediones. The reference lists of selected articles also were searched. Articles chosen for review were required to assess clinically important outcomes or surrogate markers that have been shown to have a direct link to clinically important outcomes.

RESULTS

The data reviewed suggest that the sulfonylureas and/or metformin are able to reduce microvascular complications associated with type 2 diabetes but do not substantially affect macrovascular complications. In contrast, the TZDs demonstrate insulin-sensitizing effects attributable to their novel mechanism of action on the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma. The resulting reduction in insulin resistance appears to improve many of the metabolic and cardiovascular pathways influenced by insulin activity. Blood pressure, vascular and coagulation defects, lipid abnormalities, and beta-cell function have been found to improve in patients receiving TZD treatment. For example, there are reports of significant reductions in levels of C-reactive protein (P < 0.01); small, dense low-density lipoprotein cholesterol particles (P < 0.05); and circulating free fatty acids (P < 0.003), in addition to improvements in the proinsulin-to-insulin ratio (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In this review of the literature, use of TZDs as monotherapy or as part of combination therapy has been associated with effective glycemic control and reductions in markers of various macrovascular complications of type 2 diabetes. Although outcomes trials are ongoing, the preliminary effects of TZD therapy are promising and suggest that earlier use of TZDs in the pharmacologic management of type 2 diabetes has the potential to minimize severe disease sequelae.

Effects of troglitazone in young first-degree relatives of patients with type 2 diabetes

OBJECTIVE

Insulin resistance is a key characteristic of first-degree relatives of patients with type 2 diabetes. We therefore treated young, glucose-tolerant relatives with the insulin action enhancer troglitazone in order to determine the effects on insulin sensitivity, glucose metabolism, and glycogen synthase activity.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Relatives were randomized in a double-blind manner and treated for 12 weeks with either 200 mg troglitazone or placebo. Before and after treatment, an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and a euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp (40 mU. m(-2). min(-1)) were performed, including 3-(3)H glucose infusion, glycolytic flux calculations, indirect calorimetry, and muscle biopsies.

RESULTS

Twelve relatives received troglitazone and 12 placebo (aged 30.8 +/- 2.0 vs. 30.3 +/- 1.6 years, BMI 29.6 +/- 0.8 vs. 30.5 +/- 1.3 kg/m(2); means +/- SE). Area under the curve (AUC) for plasma glucose at the second OGTT was unchanged after troglitazone. In contrast, troglitazone reduced fasting (from 70.3 +/- 6.9 to 52.2 +/- 5.8 vs. 73.6 +/- 11.0 to 73.3 +/- 6.5 pmol/l, P < 0.02) and AUC plasma insulin (mean [CI] from 335.7 [230.9-488.1] to 277.4 [179.4-428.8] vs. 313.8 [218.2-451.2] to 353.9 [208.3-601.3] pmol/l, P < 0.05). Additionally, fasting plasma triglycerides were reduced by troglitazone (from 1.86 +/- 0.33 to 1.38 +/- 0.27 vs. 2.22 +/- 0.44 to 2.35 +/- 0.46 mmol/l, P < 0.01). Insulin-stimulated glucose disposal increased in the troglitazone group (from 208.3 +/- 23.7 to 263.5 +/- 30.4 vs. 197.1 +/- 20.0 to 200.8 +/- 20.8 mg. m(-2). min(-1), P < 0.02) mainly due to increased glucose storage (from 99.9 +/- 17.9 to 146.0 +/- 25.3 vs. 87.1 +/- 16.7 to 87.9 +/- 15.7 mg. m(-2). min(-1), P < 0.02), which took place without altering insulin-stimulated glycogen synthase activity.

CONCLUSIONS

In glucose-tolerant first-degree relatives, treatment with troglitazone improved insulin sensitivity almost 50%, primarily due to increased glucose storage. It is suggested that the use of insulin action enhancers can be especially valuable in this group of subjects with a known high risk for developing type 2 diabetes.

Insulin resistance: from predisposing factor to therapeutic target in type 2 diabetes

BACKGROUND

Insulin resistance contributes to the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes and is closely linked with cardiovascular risk factors and premature cardiovascular disease.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this paper was to review the importance of insulin resistance as a core defect in type 2 diabetes, a potential contributor to accelerated atherosclerosis, and a potential target for insulin-sensitizing agents.

METHODS

Articles considered for inclusion in this review were identified through a search of MEDLINE/PubMed for reports published from 1966 to April 2003. Search terms used were insulin resistance, diabetes, insulin sensitivity, obesity, cardiovascular disease, metformin, thiazolidinediones, pioglitazone, rosiglitazone, and troglitazone.

RESULTS

An overview of the epidemiology, natural history, and pathophysiology of type 2 diabetes is provided, with a focus on insulin resistance and a related discussion of the impact of current therapies used to treat insulin-resistant patients. In particular, information on insulin-sensitizing agents-metformin and the currently available thiazolidinediones (TZDs), pioglitazone and rosiglitazone-is presented. Although metformin has been shown to indirectly reduce insulin resistance, TZDs are the only available agents that have been shown to directly lower insulin resistance.

CONCLUSIONS

Recent evidence indicates that metformin, pioglitazone, and rosiglitazone may improve the dyslipidemic profile, reduce vascular inflammation, and improve endothelial dysfunction, all of which may be particularly important to physicians seeking treatment options to prevent or reduce cardiovascular complications in patients with type 2 diabetes.

The management of the obese diabetic patient

The prevalence of obesity and diabetes is increasing in the United States and worldwide. These diseases are predicted to explode to epidemic proportions, unless appropriate counteractive measures are taken. Several large studies (DCCT, UKPDS, Kumamoto) clearly showed that intensive glycemic control in the diabetic patient reduced microvascular complications and improved mortality. Despite this, the NHANES III showed that only 50% of diabetics have been able to achieve a HgbAic level that is less than 7%; this suggests the need for a re-evaluation of our approach to these patients. The management of the obese diabetic patient involves glycemic control and weight reduction. These goals are particularly difficult to achieve in the obese diabetic patient because progressive beta-cell dysfunction and increasing insulin resistance necessitates the administration of increasingly higher dosages of insulin, which, in turn, promotes weight gain. A vicious cycle may ensue. Lifestyle modifications with diet and exercise are an essential part of the management of the obese diabetic patient. These measures alone are often insufficient and concomitant pharmacologic therapy is usually required to achieve glycemic and weight control. Oral agents that improve glycemia, decrease insulin resistance, and limit weight gain are desirable. Because of the progressive nature of diabetes, glycemic control with monotherapy often deteriorates over time, which necessitates the addition of other pharmacologic agents, including insulin. When insulin therapy is required in the treatment of the obese diabetic patient, combinations with oral agents that have been shown to minimize the amount of exogenous insulin that is required, may minimize weight gain. In addition, the obese diabetic patient who is poorly controlled with maximum oral hypoglycemic therapy may benefit from weight-reducing agents, such as sibutramine or orlistat. The introduction of these agents at other points in the management of the obese diabetic patients have been successful. Finally, for the severely obese diabetic patient, bariatric surgery may be the only effective treatment. Gastric bypass has been unequivocally shown to produce significant weight loss and improve glycemic control on a long-term basis in the obese diabetic patient. It is recommended that physicians avail themselves of all of these strategies in the management of the obese patient who has type 2 diabetes.

Thiazolidinediones in type 2 diabetes mellitus: current clinical evidence

Type 2 diabetes mellitus is characterised by insulin resistance as well as progressive pancreatic beta cell dysfunction. The cornerstone of current oral blood-glucose lowering therapy consists of metformin, which primarily lowers hepatic glucose production, and the sulphonylureas that act by stimulating pancreatic beta-cells to secrete insulin. Recently, a novel class of agents, the thiazolidinediones, has been introduced that favourably influence insulin sensitivity and possibly also pancreatic beta-cell function. The thiazolidinediones are synthetic ligands that bind to the nuclear peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma and exert their action by activating transcription of genes that, among others, regulate adipocyte differentiation and adipogenesis as well as glucose and lipid metabolism. To date, the precise mechanisms underlying the actions of thiazolidinediones are largely unknown. When given as monotherapy or in combination with sulphonylureas, metformin or insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes, the currently available thiazolidinediones (rosiglitazone and pioglitazone) ameliorate glycaemic control, by lowering fasting and postprandial blood glucose levels, and improve insulin sensitivity in placebo-controlled trials. They seem to have differential effects on dyslipidaemia in patients with type 2 diabetes; rosiglitazone increases total cholesterol as well as high-density lipoprotein (HDL) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and affects plasma triglyceride levels depending on the baseline values, whereas pioglitazone lowers triglycerides and increases HDL cholesterol levels. The adverse events of both agents that occur with greater frequency than in patients treated with placebo are fluid retention and oedema. As demonstrated, mainly in preclinical studies to date, rosiglitazone and pioglitazone possess beneficial effects on other cardiovascular risk factors associated with the insulin resistance syndrome. Thus, these agents were shown to decrease blood pressure, enhance myocardial function and fibrinolysis, as well as possess anti-inflammatory and other beneficial vascular effects. Long-term efficacy and surveillance of this promising class of drugs in patients, however, still need to be demonstrated in outcome trials.

Thiazolidinediones and blood lipids in type 2 diabetes

We evaluated study population characteristics and treatment effects on blood lipids between studies in which either rosiglitazone (RSG) or pioglitazone (PIO) was investigated in patients with type 2 diabetes. We performed a summary analysis of all published double-blind, placebo-controlled studies with RSG (4 and 8 mg/d) and PIO (15, 30, and 45 mg/d). Data were analyzed by the random-effects model. Nineteen trials met our inclusion criteria, yielding 5304 patients, 3236 in studies with RSG and 2068 in studies with PIO. Subjects treated with PIO were more obese and showed more pronounced hyperglycemia and dyslipidemia (increased triglycerides and decreased HDL cholesterol) at baseline than did subjects treated with RSG. By weighted linear-regression analysis, studies with PIO showed greater beneficial effects on triglycerides, total cholesterol, and LDL cholesterol, after adjustment for the respective lipid levels at baseline. RSG 8 mg/d showed greater increases in total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol than did RSG 4 mg/d. PIO 30 mg/d showed greater reductions in triglycerides than did PIO 15 mg/d. Studies conducted with PIO showed more beneficial effects on blood lipids, but also different study population characteristics in comparison with studies conducted with RSG. Differences in both pharmacologic properties between agents and study population characteristics are likely to have influenced the results.

The “Glitazones”: Rosiglitazone and Pioglitazone

Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone are two new additions to the therapeutic options for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. These agents differ from our current therapies in their mode of action. They have potential non-glucose lowering effects that may reduce cardiovascular risk and are effective both as monotherapy and in combination with sulfonylureas, metformin, and insulin. They are generally well tolerated, with the main side effects being weight gain and fluid retention. However, special precaution is warranted in patients with congestive heart failure or hepatic disease, and monitoring of liver enzymes is recommended for the first year of therapy. Despite their effectiveness, rosiglitazone and pioglitazone remain second-line agents to metformin and glyburide, agents that have demonstrated efficacy in decreasing the microvascular and macrovascular complications associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Insulin-lowering agents in the management of polycystic ovary syndrome

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a medical condition that has brought multiple specialists together. Gynecologists, endocrinologists, cardiologists, pediatricians, and dermatologists are all concerned with PCOS patients and share research data and design clinical trials to learn more about the syndrome. Insulin resistance is a common feature of PCOS and is more marked in obese women, suggesting that PCOS and obesity have a synergistic effect on the magnitude of the insulin disorder. Hyperinsulinemia associated with insulin resistance has been causally linked to all features of the syndrome, such as hyperandrogenism, reproductive disorders, acne, hirsutism, and metabolic disturbances. Women with PCOS should be evaluated for cardiovascular risk factors, such as lipid profile and blood pressure. Modification of diet and lifestyle should be suggested to those who are obese. Several insulin-lowering agents have been tested in the management of PCOS. In particular, metformin is the only drug currently in widespread clinical use for treatment of PCOS. In a high percentage of patients, treatment with metformin is followed by regularization of menstrual cycle, reduction in hyperandrogenism and in cardiovascular risk factors, and improvement in response to therapies for induction of ovulation.

Management of diabetes mellitus and insulin resistance in patients with cardiovascular disease

Patients with diabetes have a greatly increased relative risk of developing cardiovascular disease when compared with patients without diabetes. Much of this risk is related to insulin resistance and is associated with both traditional and nontraditional cardiovascular risk factors. Therapy for diabetes must address these risk factors in an attempt to prevent and adequately treat cardiovascular disease. Pharmacologic therapy directed toward dyslipidemia and hypertension has a beneficial effect on risk factors and has been shown to decrease cardiovascular events. The effects of insulin and oral hypoglycemic agents on insulin resistance are variable, and their direct effect on cardiovascular disease is less clear. Metformin is the only oral hypoglycemic agent shown to decrease cardiovascular events independent of glycemia. The thiazolidinediones directly improve insulin resistance, decrease plasma insulin concentration, and have the potential to decrease the risk of cardiovascular disease in patients with diabetes. A number of studies have demonstrated that the thiazolidinediones produce changes in several cardiovascular risk factors associated with the insulin resistance syndrome, including lowering blood pressure, correcting diabetic dyslipidemia, improving fibrinolysis, and decreasing carotid artery intima-medial thickness. These agents bind a newly described class of receptors, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors, which may have implications for atherosclerosis. Although these drugs increase low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, they induce a favorable change in the LDL particle size and susceptibility to oxidation. Long-term clinical trials are being conducted to determine the effect that thiazolidinediones have on cardiovascular events in individuals with type 2 diabetes.

Effect of rosiglitazone treatment on soluble CD40L in patients with type 2 diabetes and coronary artery disease

BACKGROUND

Interaction of CD40L with its receptor CD40 is critically involved in inflammatory cell activation in atherogenesis. In addition, serum levels of soluble CD40L are elevated in acute coronary syndromes and have been associated with increased cardiovascular risk in healthy subjects, thus making sCD40L an intriguing target to modulate the inflammatory response in the vasculature. PPARgamma-activating thiazolidinediones, novel insulin-sensitizing antidiabetic agents, have recently been shown to exhibit antiinflammatory effects in the vessel wall. To examine whether thiazolidinedione treatment might modulate serum levels of sCD40L in high-risk patients, we performed a randomized, placebo-controlled, single-blinded trial to assess the effect of rosiglitazone on sCD40L levels in patients with type 2 diabetes and coronary artery disease (CAD).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Thirty-nine patients with diabetes and angiographically proven CAD were randomized to receive rosiglitazone (4 mg BID) or placebo for 12 weeks. Baseline parameters did not significantly differ between groups. Rosiglitazone treatment, but not placebo, significantly reduced sCD40L serum levels within the first 2 weeks by 8.1% (17.1 to -32.7) (median percentage [interquartile range]; P<0.05 compared with baseline), further decreasing it by 18.4% (-5.0 to -33.1) after 6 weeks (P<0.05 compared with baseline), and by 27.5% (8.2 to -70.5) after 12 weeks (P<0.05 compared with baseline and with 2 weeks of treatment).

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with the PPARgamma-activating thiazolidinedione rosiglitazone reduces sCD40L serum levels in patients with type 2 diabetes and CAD. These data support an antiinflammatory and potentially antiatherogenic effect of thiazolidinediones.

Type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular risk, and the link to insulin resistance

BACKGROUND

Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus frequently have coexistent dyslipidemia, hypertension, and obesity, and are at risk for microvascular and macrovascular disease complications such as myocardial infarction, stroke, retinopathy, and microalbuminuria. To optimize cardiovascular health outcomes for patients with type 2 diabetes, strategies to reduce the risks of microvascular and macrovascular disease are needed in clinical practice.

OBJECTIVE

This article provides an overview of the cardiovascular risk profile of patients with type 2 diabetes and discusses the cardiovascular consequences of use of the thiazolidinediones (insulin-sensitizing agents) in the treatment of type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

A literature search of MEDLINE/PubMed was performed to identify relevant articles published from 1966 to April 2003. Search terms used were diabetes, cardiovascular disease, atherosclerosis, dyslipidemia, obesity, hypertension, blood pressure, hyperglycemia, inflammation, C-reactive protein, fibrinolysis, plasminogen activator inhibitor type-1, microalbuminuria, thiazolidinediones, safety, hepatotoxicity, and edema. Bibliographies within the identified articles were also evaluated for additional relevant articles and information.

RESULTS

Recommendations for cardiovascular risk reduction through preventive and therapeutic strategies that target the symptoms of insulin resistance may reduce the microvascular and macrovascular sequelae of diabetes and ameliorate the impact of other components of the metabolic syndrome, including hypertension, hyperglycemia, and obesity. In this regard, thiazolidinediones are promising therapies.

CONCLUSIONS

Early data suggest that, in addition to reducing hyperglycemia, pioglitazone and rosiglitazone effect changes in the dyslipidemic profile, hemodynamics, vascular inflammation, and endothelial functioning of patients with type 2 diabetes. Additional research is needed to further distinguish the cardiovascular benefits of these drugs.

Multicenter retrospective assessment of thiazolidinedione monotherapy and combination therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes: Comparative subgroup analyses of glycemic control and blood lipid levels

BACKGROUND

Thiazolidinediones (TZDs) have contributed to the management of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus as unique insulin-sensitizing agents. When used as monotherapy or in combination therapy, these drugs not only reduce glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)) levels, but also effect changes in blood lipid concentrations and have the potential to ameliorate cardiovascular disease risk. Although drugs in the TZD class are perceived to be equivalent clinically, prospective and retrospective studies have demonstrated their ability to modify blood lipid levels.

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated and compared the effects of pioglitazone and rosiglitazone monotherapy and combination therapy on blood lipid levels and HbA(1c) in patients with type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

We conducted a multicenter retrospective chart review of 1115 records of patients with type 2 diabetes who received pioglitazone or rosiglitazone, alone or in combination with other antidiabetic agents, between August 1, 1999, and August 31, 2000. The review was conducted to evaluate pretreatment and posttreatment levels of triglyceride, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and HbA(1c).

RESULTS

All observed demographic characteristics, comorbidities, and concomitant drug use were similar in both treatment cohorts. Of the patients who received pioglitazone, 83% also received >/=1 other antihyperglycemic agent and 59% received some form of antihyperlipidemic therapy. Among those who received rosiglitazone, 81% received concomitant antihyperglycemic medication and 60% received some form of antihyperlipidemic therapy. With pioglitazone, mean levels of serum triglyceride, total cholesterol, and LDL-C decreased and HDL-C increased in most patients, with or without concomitant antihyperglycemic medications; with rosiglitazone, with or without other antidiabetic agents, triglyceride and HDL-C levels decreased, whereas total cholesterol and LDL-C levels increased in most patients. Reductions in HbA(1c) levels and increases in body weight related to each study drug were comparable.

CONCLUSIONS

This comparative assessment of pioglitazone and rosiglitazone, based on observational data, reveals that use of these TZDs with other antidiabetic agents was similar in 605 primary care practices in the United States. In both monotherapy and combination treatment regimens, pioglitazone was associated with greater beneficial effects on lipids than was rosiglitazone. Additional studies are needed to determine the long-term outcomes of TZD therapy with concomitant antihyperglycemic medications.

PPAR(gamma) and glucose homeostasis

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARgamma) is a nuclear receptor involved in the control of metabolism. Research on PPARgamma is oriented towards understanding its role in insulin sensitization, which was inspired by the discovery that antidiabetic agents, the thiazolidinediones, were agonists for PPARgamma. PPARgamma stimulation improves glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity in type 2 diabetic patients and in animal models of insulin resistance through mechanisms that are incompletely understood. Upon activation, PPARgamma heterodimerizes with retinoid X receptor, recruits specific cofactors, and binds to responsive DNA elements, thereby stimulating the transcription of target genes. Because PPARgamma is highly enriched in adipose tissue and because of its major role in adipocyte differentiation, it is thought that the effects of PPARgamma in adipose tissue are crucial to explain its role in insulin sensitization, but recent studies have highlighted the contribution of other tissues as well. Although relatively potent for their insulin-sensitizing action, currently marketed PPARgamma activators have some important undesirable side effects. These concerns led to the discovery of new ligands with potent antidiabetic properties but devoid of certain of these side effects. Data from human genetic studies and from PPARgamma heterozygous knockout mice indicate that a reduction in PPARgamma activity could paradoxically improve insulin sensitivity. These findings suggest that modulation of PPARgamma activity by partial agonists or compounds that affect cofactor recruitment might hold promise for the treatment of insulin resistance.

Insulin resistance, diabetes, and atherosclerosis: thiazolidinediones as therapeutic interventions

The insulin resistance syndrome, a cluster of metabolic abnormalities involving dyslipidemia, hypertension, diabetes, impaired glucose tolerance, and hypercoagulability, carries an increased risk of atherosclerosis. Although interventions targeting elements of this syndrome have dramatically reduced cardiovascular risk, the impact of glucose-lowering has been more disappointing. Thiazolidinediones (TZDs) are a new class of insulin-sensitizing agents that activate the nuclear receptor peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-g. TZDs may improve not only glucose levels but also other metabolic parameters associated with insulin resistance. The TZD data are reviewed, with a focus on their potential cardiovascular effects.

Rosiglitazone: a review of its use in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus

Rosiglitazone, a thiazolidinedione with a different side chain from those of troglitazone and pioglitazone, reduces plasma glucose levels and glucose production and increases glucose clearance in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Insulin sensitivity, pancreatic beta-cell function and surrogate markers of cardiovascular risk factors are significantly improved by rosiglitazone. Double-blind trials of 8 to 26 weeks of rosiglitazone 4 or 8 mg/day monotherapy indicate significant decreases in fasting plasma glucose (-2 to -3 mmol/L with 8 mg/day) and glycosylated haemoglobin levels [HbA(1c); -0.6 to -0.7% (-0.8 to -1.1% in drug-naive patients) with 8 mg/day]. Significant decreases in hyperglycaemic markers occurred when rosiglitazone was combined with metformin (HbA(1c) -0.8 to -1.0%), a sulphonylurea (-1.4%) or insulin (-1.2%) for 26 weeks versus little change with active comparator monotherapy. Efficacy was maintained in trials of < or = 2 years, and was also apparent in various ethnic subgroups, elderly patients, and both obese and nonobese patients. Rosiglitazone is currently not indicated in combination with injected insulin. It should be administered in conjunction with diet and exercise regimens. Rosiglitazone is generally well tolerated. Despite rare individual reports of liver function abnormalities in rosiglitazone recipients, the incidence of these in clinical trials (< or = 2 years' duration) was similar to that in placebo and active comparator groups. Fluid retention associated with rosiglitazone may be the cause of the increased incidence of anaemia in clinical trials, and also means that patients should be monitored for signs of heart failure during therapy. Although bodyweight is increased overall with rosiglitazone therapy, increases are in subcutaneous, not visceral, fat; hepatic fat is decreased. The pharmacokinetic profile of rosiglitazone is not substantially altered by age or renal impairment, nor are there important drug interactions. Rosiglitazone is not indicated in patients with active liver disease or increased liver enzymes.

CONCLUSIONS

Oral rosiglitazone 4 or 8 mg/day provides significant antihyperglycaemic efficacy and is generally well tolerated, both as monotherapy and in combination with other antihyperglycaemic agents, in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who do not have active liver disease. Long-term data are required before conclusions can be drawn about the clinical significance of positive changes to surrogate markers of cardiovascular disease risk and improvements to pancreatic beta-cell function. Rosiglitazone significantly improves insulin sensitivity and, as such, is a welcome addition to the treatment options for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Oral combination therapy for type 2 diabetes

For patients with type 2 diabetes, oral monotherapy may be initially effective for controlling blood glucose, but it is associated with a high secondary failure rate. (Primary failure is frequent only in patients with high baseline blood glucose at the time of beginning monotherapy, whereas secondary failure is to be expected in the course of the disease.) The different classes of oral agents used to treat type 2 diabetes have complementary mechanisms of action, and their use in combination often results in blood glucose reductions that are significantly greater than those that can be obtained with maximal doses of any single drug. A wide range of combinations (e.g. sulfonylurea plus metformin, a thiazolidinedione, or acarbose; metformin plus a thiazolidinedione or acarbose) have been used effectively to achieve glycemic control in patients in whom oral monotherapy has failed. The high secondary failure rates for oral monotherapy - and, moreover, the high primary failure rate in patients with very high blood glucose at diagnosis - coupled with the effectiveness of combination treatment, support the suggestion that multiple-drug regimens be considered for initial pharmacologic treatment in patients with symptomatic type 2 diabetes whose blood glucose is not controlled by diet alone.

Lipid effects of glyburide/metformin tablets in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus with poor glycemic control and dyslipidemia in an open-label extension study

BACKGROUND

Because both type 2 diabetes and elevated plasma lipid levels are important independent risk factors for cardiovascular disease and coronary heart disease, the choice of an antihyperglycemic agent for patients with type 2 diabetes--in whom abnormal plasma lipid levels are often seen-should take into account effects on lipids as well as on markers of glycemic control.

OBJECTIVE

This study assessed the effects on lipid levels of glyburide/metformin tablets in the treatment of type 2 diabetes, particularly in a group of patients who had poor glycemic control and dyslipidemia at baseline.

METHODS

This 52-week, open-label study was an extension of a 32-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. The patient population was drawn from 3 groups: those who completed the double-blind study, those who were discontinued from the double-blind study, and those who were ineligible for the double-blind study based on predefined measures of glycemic control (screening fasting plasma glucose > 240 mg/dL and glycosylated hemoglobin [HbA1c] < or = 12%, or HbA1c 11%-12%) and were directly enrolled in the open-label extension study. Patients with an HbA1c of < 9% received glyburide/ metformin tablets 1.25 mg/250 mg BID; those with an HbA1c > or = 9% received glyburide/ metformin tablets 2.5 mg/500 mg BID. Changes in total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and triglyceride (TG) levels were assessed for 52 weeks.

RESULTS

The study population included 828 patients: 515 who completed the double-blind study, 138 who were discontinued from the double-blind study, and 175 who were enrolled directly. Direct enrollees had poor glycemic control and dyslipidemia at baseline. Improvements in plasma lipid levels were seen as early as week 13. At week 52, the mean change in TC from baseline was -8.0 mg/dL for the total population (95% CI, -10.9 to -5.2; P < 0.05) and -23.2 mg/dL for direct enrollees (95% CI, -30.1 to -16.4; P < 0.05). The mean decrease in LDL-C from baseline for the total population was 2.86 mg/dL (95% CI, -5.3 to -0.4; P < 0.05), compared with a reduction of 13.3 mg/dL for direct enrollees (95% CI, -18.5 to -8.1; P < 0.05). Mean HDL-C levels were minimally affected. Mean TG levels decreased by 27.8 mg/dL for the entire population (95% CI, -42.9 to -12.8; P < 0.05) and by 99.7 mg/dL for direct enrollees (95% CI, -152.5 to -46.8; P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

In this open-label extension study, treatment with glyburide/ metformin tablets for type 2 diabetes had a durable, favorable effect on lipid levels, particularly in those with poor glycemic control and dyslipidemia at baseline.

Ameliorated hepatic insulin resistance is associated with normalization of microsomal triglyceride transfer protein expression and reduction in very low density lipoprotein assembly and secretion in the fructose-fed hamster

To determine whether reduction of insulin resistance could ameliorate fructose-induced very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) oversecretion and to explore the mechanism of this effect, fructose-fed hamsters received placebo or rosiglitazone for 3 weeks. Rosiglitazone treatment led to normalization of the blunted insulin-mediated suppression of the glucose production rate and to a approximately 2-fold increase in whole body insulin-mediated glucose disappearance rate (p < 0.001). Rosiglitazone ameliorated the defect in hepatocyte insulin-stimulated tyrosine phosphorylation of the insulin receptor, IRS-1, and IRS-2 and the reduced protein mass of IRS-1 and IRS-2 induced by fructose feeding. Protein-tyrosine phosphatase 1B levels were increased with fructose feeding and were markedly reduced by rosiglitazone. Rosiglitazone treatment led to a approximately 50% reduction of VLDL secretion rates (p < 0.05) in vivo and ex vivo. VLDL clearance assessed directly in vivo was not significantly different in the FR (fructose-fed + rosiglitazone-treated) versus F (fructose-fed + placebo-treated) hamsters, although there was a trend toward a lower clearance with rosiglitazone. Enhanced stability of nascent apolipoprotein B (apoB) in fructose-fed hepatocytes was evident, and rosiglitazone treatment resulted in a significant reduction in apoB stability. The increase in intracellular mass of microsomal triglyceride transfer protein seen with fructose feeding was reduced by treatment with rosiglitazone. In conclusion, improvement of hepatic insulin signaling with rosiglitazone, a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma agonist, is associated with reduced hepatic VLDL assembly and secretion due to reduced intracellular apoB stability.

Thiazolidinediones and type 2 diabetes: new drugs for an old disease

Thiazolidinediones are a new class of drugs for the treatment of type 2 diabetes, and act by improving insulin sensitivity in adipose tissue, liver and skeletal muscle. Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone are registered for use in monotherapy, and in combination with sulfonylureas and metformin. Pioglitazone is also licensed for use in combination with insulin. There is level II evidence that in patients with inadequate glycaemic control both drugs reduce the level of HbA1c and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) when used as monotherapy and in combination with sulfonylurea or metformin or insulin; and both drugs increase levels of HDL and LDL and lower free fatty acid levels, but only pioglitazone significantly lowers triglyceride levels. Both drugs lower fasting insulin and C-peptide levels. In monotherapy, they may be slightly less potent at reducing the level of HbA1c than sulfonylureas or metformin. The maximal effect of these agents may not be seen for 6-14 weeks after commencement. Both drugs are well tolerated but liver function must be checked at baseline every second month for the first year, and periodically thereafter. The drugs are currently contraindicated in patients with moderate to severe liver dysfunction and alanine aminotransferase levels more than 2.5 times normal, New York Heart Association III-IV cardiac status, pregnancy, lactation and in children. The main side effects include weight gain, oedema, and mild dilutional anaemia.

Hepatotoxicity with thiazolidinediones: is it a class effect?

Decreased insulin sensitivity plays a major role in various human diseases. particularly type 2 diabetes mellitus, and is associated with a higher risk of atherosclerosis and cardiovascular complications. Thiazolidinediones, more commonly termed glitazones, are the first drugs to specifically target muscular insulin resistance. They have proven efficacy for reducing plasma glucose levels in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus treated with diet alone, sulphonylureas, metformin or insulin. In addition, they are associated with some improvement of the cardiovascular risk profile. However, troglitazone, the first compound approved by the Food and Drug Administration in the US, proved to be hepatotoxic and was withdrawn from the market after the report of several dozen deaths or cases of severe hepatic failure requiring liver transplantation. It remains unclear whether or not hepatotoxicity is a class effect or is related to unique properties of troglitazone. Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone, two other glitazones, appear to have similar efficacy with regard to blood glucose control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus as compared with troglitazone. In controlled clinical trials, the incidence of significant (> or =3 x upper limit of normal) increases in liver enzyme levels (ALT in particular) was similar with rosiglitazone or pioglitazone as compared with placebo, whereas troglitazone was associated with a 3-fold greater incidence. In contrast to the numerous case reports of acute liver failure in patients receiving troglitzone, only a few case reports of hepatotoxicity have been reported in patients treated with rosiglitazone until now, with a causal relationship remaining uncertain. Furthermore, no single case of severe hepatotoxicity has been reported yet with pioglitazone. It should be mentioned that troglitazone, unlike pioglitazone and rosiglitazone, induces the cytochrome P450 isoform 3A4, which is partly responsible for its metabolism, and may be prone to drug interactions. Importantly enough, obesity, insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes mellitus are associated with liver abnormalities, especially non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, independent of any pharmacological treatment. This association obviously complicates the selection of patients who are good candidates for a treatment with glitazones as well as the monitoring of liver tests after initiation of therapy with any thiazolidinedione compound. While regular monitoring of liver enzymes is still recommended and more long term data are desirable, current evidence from clinical trials and postmarketing experience in the US supports the conclusion that rosiglitazone and pioglitazone do not share the hepatotoxic profile of troglitazone.

Rosiglitazone in the Treatment of Haart-Associated Lipodystrophy – a Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Study

Highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) is associated with metabolic adverse events such as insulin resistance and lipodystrophy, that is, atrophy of subcutaneous fat and accumulation of intra-abdominal fat. Currently, there is no pharmacological treatment for lipoatrophy. Glitazones, a novel class of insulin-sensitizing anti-diabetic agents, increase subcutaneous fat in patients with type 2 diabetes. There are no controlled studies of glitazones in patients with HAART-associated lipodystrophy (HAL). In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 30 patients with HAL received either rosiglitazone (8 mg daily) or placebo for 24 weeks. Baseline characteristics were compared to a group of 30 age-, sex- and weight-matched HIV-negative controls. At baseline, patients with HAL had 1.8-fold (P<0.001) more intra-abdominal and 2.4-fold (P<0.05) more liver fat than HIV-negative controls, who had 1.8-fold (P<0.001) more subcutaneous fat than the patients. After 24 weeks of treatment, rosiglitazone had no effect on body weight, subcutaneous or intra-abdominal fat (magnetic resonance imaging), total body fat (bioimpedance analysis), anthropometric measurements or serum leptin concentrations (a circulating marker of adipose tissue mass). However, rosiglitazone decreased % liver fat (spectroscopy) and serum insulin concentrations, and normalized liver function tests. During the first 12 weeks of rosiglitazone treatment, serum triglycerides increased from 3.5 ±0.5 to 6.5 ±2.0 mmol/l (from 310 ±44 to 575 ±177 mg/dl) (P<0.05) and serum cholestrol from 6.0 ±0.4 to 7.8 ±0.7 mmol/l (from 232 ±15 to 301 ±27 mg/dl) (P<0.01). Contrary to data in other patient groups, rosiglitazone did not increase subcutaneous fat in patients with HAL after 24 weeks of treatment. Rosiglitazone seemed to ameliorate insulin resistance judged by the decreased serum insulin concentrations and % liver fat. Rosiglitazone unexpectedly caused significant increases in serum triglyceride and cholesterol concentrations, which must be carefully monitored if glitazones are used in these patients.

Dose-response effect of pioglitazone on insulin sensitivity and insulin secretion in type 2 diabetes

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the dose-response effects of pioglitazone on glycemic control, insulin sensitivity, and insulin secretion in patients with type 2 diabetes.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A total of 58 diet-treated patients with type 2 diabetes (aged 54 +/- 1 years; 34 men and 24 women; BMI 31.5 +/- 0.6 kg/m(2)) were randomly assigned to receive placebo (n=11) or 7.5 mg (n=13), 15 mg (n=12), 30 mg (n=11), or 45 mg (n=11) of pioglitazone per day for 26 weeks. Before and after 26 weeks, subjects underwent a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT).

RESULTS

Patients treated with 7.5 or 15 mg/day of pioglitazone had no change in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and fasting plasma insulin (FPI) concentrations or in plasma glucose (PG) and insulin concentrations during the OGTT. Patients treated with 30 and 45 mg/day of pioglitazone, respectively, had significant decreases from placebo in HbA1c (delta=-2.0 and -2.9%), FPG (delta=-66 and -97 mg/dl), and mean PG during OGTT (delta=-84 and -107 mg/dl). Fasting plasma insulin decreased significantly in the 45-mg/day pioglitazone group, but the mean plasma insulin during the OGTT did not change. The insulinogenic index (delta area under the curve [AUC] insulin/deltaAUC glucose) during the OGTT increased significantly in the 30- and 45-mg/day pioglitazone groups (0.13 +/- 0.03 to 0.27 +/- 0.05, P < 0.05). From the OGTT, we previously have derived a composite whole-body insulin sensitivity index (ISI) that correlates well with that measured directly with the insulin clamp technique. Whole-body ISI [ISI=10,000/(square-root (FPG x FPI) x (PG x PI)) where PG and PI equal mean plasma glucose and insulin concentrations during OGTT] increased significantly in patients treated with 30 mg (1.8 +/- 0.3 to 2.5 +/- 0.3, P < 0.05) or 45 mg (1.6 +/- 0.2 to 2.7 +/- 0.6, P < 0.05) per day of pioglitazone. In the basal state, the hepatic ISI [k/(FPG x FPI)[k/(FPG x FPI)], which agrees closely with that measured directly with tritiated glucose, increased in patients treated with 30 mg (0.13 +/- 0.02 to 0.21 +/- 0.03, P < 0.05) and 45 mg (0.11 +/- 0.02 to 0.24 +/- 0.06, P < 0.05) per day of pioglitazone. Significant correlations between the dose of pioglitazone and the changes in HbA1c (r=-0.58), FPG (r=-0.47), mean PG during the OGTT (r=-0.46), insulinogenic index (r=0.34), hepatic ISI (r=0.44), and whole-body ISI (r=0.36) were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Pioglitazone improves glycemic control through the dose-dependent enhancement of beta-cell function and improved whole-body and hepatic insulin sensitivity.

Where thiazolidinediones will fit

Individuals with type 2 diabetes have two defects: insulin resistance, which occurs in the first stages of disease progression, and pancreatic beta-cell failure, which occurs later in the disease. Insulin resistance is the major pathological defect. During the course of the disease, insulin levels are initially elevated to compensate for the increased insulin resistance and then decline as the disease progresses and beta-cells become less responsive. It is necessary to change antidiabetic therapies to address this progression. Current management of type 2 diabetes follows a stepwise treatment program of diet and exercise, monotherapy with oral antidiabetic agents, combination oral therapy and, ultimately, combination therapy with insulin to control blood glucose levels. While control of blood glucose will reduce the risk of microvascular complications, such as microalbuminuria and retinopathy, the incidence of macrovascular complications is not significantly reduced. The introduction of the thiazolidinediones (TZDs) or 'glitazones', a class of agents that offer effective glycemic control and work through the reduction of insulin resistance, offers a new strategy in the management of this condition. These agents have beneficial effects on the pancreatic beta-cell and, in addition, may have potential benefits on the macrovascular complications that commonly occur in these patients.

Efficacy and safety of rosiglitazone plus metformin in Mexicans with type 2 diabetes

BACKGROUND

Type 2 diabetes is a growing problem in Mexico. The present study was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy and safety of rosiglitazone 2 mg or 4 mg twice daily (bd) in combination with metformin 2.5 g/day in Mexican patients whose type 2 diabetes was inadequately controlled with metformin alone.

METHODS

This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted at four centers in Mexico. A total of 116 patients were randomized to metformin 2.5 g/day plus placebo (n=39), metformin 2.5 g/day plus rosiglitazone 2 mg bd (n=37), or metformin 2.5 g/day plus rosiglitazone 4 mg bd (n=40) for 26 weeks.

RESULTS

Mean hemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)) levels decreased significantly from baseline to Week 26 in the rosiglitazone 2 mg bd (-0.7%; p=0.0052) and 4 mg bd (-1.2%; p=0.0008) groups, but increased in the placebo group (+0.3%; p=0.2651). Mean fasting plasma glucose and fructosamine levels also improved significantly with metformin plus rosiglitazone therapy in a dose-ordered manner compared with placebo (p<or=0.0019 and p=0.0006, respectively). C-peptide and immunoreactive insulin levels were decreased from baseline in both rosiglitazone groups. Although mean increases in total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol, and high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol were observed in the rosiglitazone groups, the total cholesterol:HDL-cholesterol ratio remained unchanged. The proportion of patients with one or more adverse events was similar across all three groups. There were no cases of hepatotoxicity.

CONCLUSION

Addition of rosiglitazone 2 mg bd and 4 mg bd to metformin therapy improved glycemic control in Mexican patients whose type 2 diabetes was inadequately controlled by metformin alone. Furthermore, the combination of rosiglitazone plus metformin was well tolerated.

Effects of pioglitazone and rosiglitazone on blood lipid levels and glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a retrospective review of randomly selected medical records

BACKGROUND

The antihyperglycemic effects of pioglitazone hydrochloride and rosiglitazone maleate are well documented. The results of clinical trials and observational studies have suggested, however, that there are individual differences in the effects of these drugs on blood lipid levels.

OBJECTIVE

The present study evaluated the effects of pioglitazone and rosiglitazone on blood lipid levels and glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

METHODS

This was a retrospective review of randomly selected medical records from 605 primary care practices in the United States in which adults with type 2 diabetes received pioglitazone or rosiglitazone between August 1, 1999, and August 31, 2000. The outcome measures were mean changes in serum concentrations of triglycerides (TG), total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) values.

RESULTS

Treatment with pioglitazone was associated with a reduction in mean TG of 55.17 mg/dL, a reduction in TC of 8.45 mg/dL, an increase in HDL-C of 2.65 mg/dL, and a reduction in LDL-C of 5.05 mg/dL. Treatment with rosiglitazone was associated with a reduction in mean TG of 13.34 mg/dL, an increase in TC of 4.81 mg/dL, a reduction in HDL-C of 0.12 mg/dL, and an increase in LDL-C of 3.56 mg/dL. With the exception of HDL-C, the differences in mean changes in lipid parameters between treatment groups were statistically significant (P < 0.001, pioglitazone vs rosiglitazone). Reductions in HbA1c were statistically equivalent between treatments (1.04% pioglitazone, 1.18% rosiglitazone).

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with pioglitazone was associated with greater beneficial effects on blood lipid levels than treatment with rosiglitazone, whereas glycemic control was equivalent between the 2 treatments.

Vascular protective effects by activation of nuclear receptor PPARgamma

Pharmaceutical interventions targeting proteins that regulate VSMC growth and movement are promising new approach to treat diabetes-associated cardiovascular disease. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma (PPARgamma) is a ligand-activated transcription factor in the nuclear receptor superfamily. Thiazolidineodione (TZT) insulin sensitizers are pharmacologic ligands for PPARgamma. All of the major cells in the vasculature express PPARgamma, including endothelial cells. VSMCs, and monocytes/macrophages. PPARgamma ligands may protect the vasculature against injury by inhibiting cell growth and movement, improving endothelial function, and suppressing tissue inflammation. Antiproliferative effects of PPARgamma ligands are mediated by targeting critical cell cycle regulators, including Rb and p27(Kip1), that regulate the progression of cells from G1 phase into S phase to conduct DNA synthesis. Pharmacologic activation of PPARgamma in vascular cells may provide a novel therapeutic approach to retard diabetes-associated vascular disease.

Lipids and diabetes mellitus: a review of therapeutic options

Diabetes mellitus ia very common disease with a high cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. This articles reviews the types of lipid disorders that can accompany diabetes mellitus and the evidence that treatment of dyslipidaemia improves primary and secondary endpoints, i.e. lipid levels, cardiovascular events, and mortality. Specific lipid-lowering strategies are discussed, including diet and exercise, treatment of hyperglycaemia, and the use of lipid-lowering therapy such as statins, fibric acid derivatives, bile acid sequestrants, nicotinic acid and its derivatives, fish oil and hormone replacement therapy. An approach to the patient with diabetes mellitus and dyslipidaemia is provided.

Oral therapies for diabetic hyperglycemia

Many classes of oral antihyperglycemic agents are available for the treatment of type 2 diabetic patients. These classes improve glucose metabolism by different mechanisms, and their effects are additive. Therapy with lifestyle modification and a single oral antihyperglycemic agent infrequently achieves target glycemic goals, and, if it does, the effect is usually not sustained. A more rational approach would seem to be therapy with combinations of drugs with different mechanisms of action. Initial therapy might be with submaximal concentrations of two drugs. As the diabetic abnormalities progress, maximal concentrations of the drugs and addition of other classes of oral agents or insulin may be needed to maintain the target glycemic goal. In choosing combinations of oral antihyperglycemic agents, their effects on the components treatment of type 2 diabetic patients. These classes improve glucose considered, as must the specific effects of the agents on glucose metabolism.

Management of the insulin resistance syndrome

The insulin resistance syndrome (IRS) is a common disorder, which has important clinical implications. It is a cluster of cardiovascular risk factors that include obesity, hypertension, dyslipidemia, glucose intolerance, and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Lifestyle modifications and insulin sensitizers are among the several therapeutic strategies available for the treatment of the IRS. Optimal treatment will not only improve glycemic control, but may also significantly lower cardiovascular disease.

Controlling postprandial hyperglycemia

A growing body of evidence indicates that measurements of postprandial glucose levels, in combination with glycosylated hemoglobin, are a more accurate predictor of metabolic abnormality than fasting or preprandial glucose levels for individuals with type 2 diabetes. Early identification of elevated postprandial blood glucose levels is an important step in predicting the onset of microvascular and macrovascular complications that can progress to full symptomatic diabetes. This article summarizes the research conducted to date on the diagnostic import of postprandial glucose and the parameters established for judging the need for treatment. When individuals cannot reach target glucose levels through diet and exercise, medical treatment is necessary. The article reviews a range of treatment options, including insulin secretagogues, insulin sensitizers, antiabsorptive agents, weight reduction agents, and insulin and combination medical therapy.

A review of rosiglitazone in type 2 diabetes mellitus

The thiazolidinedione rosiglitazone maleate works primarily to improve insulin sensitivity in muscle and adipose tissue. It may have additional pharmacologic effects, however, as its main target is peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma. Data using the homeostasis model assessment and proinsulin:insulin ratio in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus suggest that rosiglitazone may have the potential to sustain or improve beta-cell function. In these patients the drug reduces fasting plasma glucose, glycosylated hemoglobin, insulin, and C-peptide. In clinical trials, rosiglitazone monotherapy significantly reduced glycosylated hemoglobin by 1.5% compared with placebo and led to significant improvements in glycemic control when given in combination with metformin, sulfonylureas, or insulin. A dosage of 4 mg twice/day significantly reduced fasting plasma glucose levels and produced comparable reductions in glycosylated hemoglobin compared with glyburide. Rosiglitazone has a low risk of gastrointestinal side effects and hypoglycemia, reduced insulin demand, potential sparing effects on beta-cells, and favorable drug interaction profile. Adverse events of clinical significance are edema, anemia, and weight gain. Premarketing data indicate no significant difference in liver enzyme elevations for rosiglitazone, placebo, or active controls. Another drug in the thiazolidinedione class, troglitazone, was associated with idiosyncratic hepatotoxicity and was removed from the market. Therefore, until long-term data are available for rosiglitazone, liver enzyme monitoring is recommended.

A randomized trial of rosiglitazone therapy in patients with inadequately controlled insulin-treated type 2 diabetes

OBJECTIVE

To determine the efficacy and safety of rosiglitazone (RSG) when added to insulin in the treatment of type 2 diabetic patients who are inadequately controlled on insulin monotherapy.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

After 8 weeks of insulin standardization and placebo (PBO) run-in, 319 type 2 diabetic patients with mean baseline HbA(1c) > or = 7.5% (8.9 +/- 1.1 to 9.1 +/- 1.3) on twice-daily insulin therapy (total daily dose > or = 30 U) were randomized to 26 weeks of additional treatment with RSG (4 or 8 mg daily) or PBO. Insulin dose could be down- titrated only for safety reasons. The primary end point was reduction of HbA(1c) from baseline.

RESULTS

RSG 4 and 8 mg daily significantly improved glycemic control, which was unchanged on PBO. By intent-to-treat analysis, treatment with RSG 8 mg plus insulin resulted in a mean reduction from baseline in HbA(1c) of 1.2% (P < 0.0001), despite a 12% mean reduction of insulin dosage. Over 50% of subjects treated daily with RSG 8 mg plus insulin had a reduction of HbA(1c) > or = 1.0%. Neither total:HDL cholesterol nor LDL:HDL cholesterol ratios significantly changed with RSG treatment. Serious adverse events did not differ among groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of RSG to insulin treatment results in significant improvement in glycemic control and is generally well tolerated.

Lessons from the glitazones: a story of drug development

Troglitazone, the first in the thiazolidinedione class of oral hypoglycaemic agents, was launched in the USA in March, 1997. It reached Europe later that year, only to be withdrawn within weeks on the grounds of liver toxicity. Meanwhile it went on to generate sales of over $2 billion in the USA, and caused at least 90 cases of liver failure (70 resulting in death or transplantation) before it was withdrawn in March, 2000. Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone reached the US market in 1999 as first-line agents to be used alone or in combination with other drugs, but in Europe the same dossiers were used one year later to apply for a limited licence as second-line agents restricted to oral combination therapy. How should we use the glitazones? And how did they achieve blockbuster status without any clear evidence of advantage over existing therapy?

New oral therapies for type 2 diabetes mellitus: The glitazones or insulin sensitizers

Type 2 diabetes mellitus is a growing problem not only in the United States but also across the world. There is now strong evidence that intensive control of blood glucose can significantly reduce and retard the microvascular complications of retinopathy, nephropathy, and neuropathy. Ultimately however, up to 80% of type 2 diabetics die from macrovascular cardiovascular disease. This increased incidence of atherosclerotic disease is intricately associated with insulin resistance, which is a major pathophysiologic abnormality in type 2 diabetes. There is strong evidence that insulin resistance is involved in the development of not only hyperglycemia, but also dyslipidemia, hypertension, hypercoagulation, vasculopathy, and ultimately atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. This cluster of metabolic abnormalities has been termed the insulin resistance or cardiovascular dysmetabolic syndrome. The thiazolidinediones (rosiglitazone and pioglitazone), a new class of oral antidiabetic agents, are "insulin sensitizers" and exert direct effects on the mechanisms of insulin resistance. These effects not only improve insulin sensitivity and glycemic control with reduced insulin requirements, but also have potentially favorable effects on other components of the cardiovascular dysmetabolic syndrome. Long-term studies are needed to determine whether the insulin-sensitizing effects of the glitazones can prevent or delay premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, morbidity, and death.

Rosiglitazone

Type 2 diabetes mellitus is characterised by impaired insulin secretion, diminished peripheral insulin action and increased hepatic glucose production. Clinical trials have indicated that near-normal glucose control may reduce the risk for microvascular and - to a lesser extent - macrovascular complications in Type 2 diabetic patients. Thiazolidinediones improve insulin action by activating a nuclear receptor, PPARgamma. Therefore, these drugs are often referred to as 'insulin sensitisers'. Rosiglitazone is the second compound of this group. Clinical studies with rosiglitazone have shown that it is effective in lowering blood glucose levels in Type 2 diabetic patients treated with either diet alone, sulphonylurea or metformin. Preliminary studies suggest that rosiglitazone also improves glycaemic control in insulin-treated patients while even slightly decreasing insulin dose. The magnitude of the effects is, however, moderate. In diet-treated patients, the reduction of HbA1c levels amounted on average 0.5 - 1.5% and addition to existing sulphonylurea therapy decreased HbA1c by 1.0 - 1.2%. The clinical relevance of additional beneficial effects, i.e., on blood pressure and microalbuminuria, needs to be determined further. Rosiglitazone does not cause hypoglycaemia or gastrointestinal side effects. There is however some concern related to fluid retention, which seems to be an effect of all PPARgamma agonists. In patients treated with rosiglitazone, no severe hepatotoxic side effects have been noticed until now. In the treatment of our patients with Type 2 diabetes, drugs like rosiglitazone which directly reduce insulin resistance are very welcome but more data on its combined use with insulin are needed. Additional studies will also explore its long-term effects in sparing beta-cell function and reducing diabetes-related complications and atherosclerosis.

Insulin-lowering drugs in polycystic ovary syndrome

The discovery that insulin resistance has a key role in the pathophysiology of PCOS has led to a novel and promising form of therapy in the form of the insulin-sensitizing drugs. Although no extremely large trials using these drugs for this indication have been performed, more than 18 trials have specifically examined the effects of these drugs on ovulation, hyperandrogenemia, and dysmetabolic features in PCOS. Table 1 summarizes the results of previous trials using each of the insulin-sensitizing drugs discussed herein. Among the various agents (i.e., thiazolidinediones, [table: see text] metformin, and D-chiro-inositol), metformin is the most widely tested. Metformin may have the added benefit of improving at least some features of syndrome X, such as hypertension and obesity. All of the evidence to date suggests that metformin is a safe drug to administer to women who may become pregnant. In contrast, the two thiazolidinediones currently available, rosiglitazone and pioglitazone, are category C drugs that have been demonstrated to retard fetal development in animal studies. Overall, insulin-sensitizing therapy presents a promising and unique therapeutic intervention for the treatment of PCOS, offering metabolic and gynecologic benefits for women who sustain this syndrome.

Control of vascular cell proliferation and migration by PPAR-gamma: a new approach to the macrovascular complications of diabetes

Compared with nondiabetic subjects, type 2 diabetic individuals are at an increased risk for coronary artery disease and coronary restenosis after angioplasty or stenting. Increased proliferation and migration of vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) contribute importantly to the formation of both atherosclerotic and restenotic lesions. Therefore, pharmaceutical interventions targeting proteins that regulate VSMC growth or movement are a promising new approach to treat diabetes-associated cardiovascular disease. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma (PPAR-gamma) is a member of the nuclear receptor superfamily that, when activated by thiazolidinedione (TZD) insulin sensitizers, regulates a host of target genes. All of the major cells in the vasculature express PPAR-gamma, including endothelial cells, VSMCs, and monocytes/macrophages. PPAR-gamma is present in intimal macrophages and VSMCs in early human atheromas. In an animal model of vascular injury; PPAR-gamma levels are substantially elevated in the neointima that forms after mechanical injury of the endothelium. Recent experimental studies provide evidence that PPAR-gamma may function to protect the vasculature from injury. Cell culture studies have shown that TZD PPAR-gamma ligands inhibit both the proliferation and migration of VSMCs. These antiatherogenic activities of PPAR-gamma may also occur in vivo, because TZDs inhibit lesion formation in several animal models. PPAR-gamma ligands may also protect the vasculature indirectly by normalizing metabolic abnormalities of the diabetic milieu that increase cardiovascular risk. Activation of PPAR-gamma, newly defined in vascular cells, may be a useful approach to protect the vasculature in diabetes.

Insulin sensitiser drugs

Insulin resistance is the predominant early pathological defect in Type 2 diabetes. As well as being a risk factor for the development of Type 2 diabetes, insulin resistance is also associated with increased cardiovascular risk and other metabolic disturbances including visceral adiposity, hyperinsulinaemia, impaired glucose tolerance, hypertension and dyslipidaemia [1-4]. The newest approach to oral antidiabetic therapy is to target improvements in insulin sensitivity at muscle, adipose tissue and hepatic level. This results in improvements in glycaemic control and other features of the insulin resistance syndrome, with potential long-term benefits in preventing/delaying the onset of diabetic complications and macrovascular disease.