1
|
Nagendra L, Pappachan JM, Fernandez CJ. Artificial intelligence in the diagnosis of thyroid cancer: Recent advances and future directions. Artif Intell Cancer 2023; 4:1-10. [DOI: 10.35713/aic.v4.i1.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2023] [Revised: 07/24/2023] [Accepted: 08/07/2023] [Indexed: 09/07/2023] [Imported: 09/07/2023] Open
Abstract
The diagnosis and management of thyroid cancer is fraught with challenges despite the advent of innovative diagnostic, surgical, and chemotherapeutic modalities. Challenges like inaccuracy in prognostication, uncertainty in cytopathological diagnosis, trouble in differentiating follicular neoplasms, intra-observer and inter-observer variability on ultrasound imaging preclude personalised treatment in thyroid cancer. Artificial intelligence (AI) is bringing a paradigm shift to the healthcare, powered by quick advancement of the analytic techniques. Several recent studies have shown remarkable progress in thyroid cancer diagnostics based on AI-assisted algorithms. Application of AI techniques in thyroid ultrasonography and cytopathology have shown remarkable impro-vement in sensitivity and specificity over the traditional diagnostic modalities. AI has also been explored in the development of treatment algorithms for indeterminate nodules and for prognostication in the patients with thyroid cancer. The benefits of high repeatability and straightforward implementation of AI in the management of thyroid cancer suggest that it holds promise for clinical application. Limited clinical experience and lack of prospective validation studies remain the biggest drawbacks. Developing verified and trustworthy algorithms after extensive testing and validation using prospective, multi-centre trials is crucial for the future use of AI in the pipeline of precision medicine in the management of thyroid cancer.
Collapse
|
Evidence Review |
2 |
4 |
2
|
Ullah M, Akbar A, Yannarelli G. Applications of artificial intelligence in, early detection of cancer, clinical diagnosis and personalized medicine. Artif Intell Cancer 2020; 1:39-44. [DOI: 10.35713/aic.v1.i2.39] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2020] [Revised: 08/24/2020] [Accepted: 08/31/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
|
Evidence Review |
5 |
4 |
3
|
Liu Y. Application of artificial intelligence in clinical non-small cell lung cancer. Artif Intell Cancer 2020; 1:19-30. [DOI: 10.35713/aic.v1.i1.19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2020] [Revised: 06/17/2020] [Accepted: 06/18/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
|
Minireviews |
5 |
2 |
4
|
Cassell III AK, Cassell LT, Bague AH. Management of cancer patients during the COVID-19 pandemic: A comprehensive review. Artif Intell Cancer 2020; 1:8-18. [DOI: 10.35713/aic.v1.i1.8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2020] [Revised: 06/22/2020] [Accepted: 06/30/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
|
Evidence Review |
5 |
1 |
5
|
Ogura M, Kiyuna T, Yoshida H. Impact of blurs on machine-learning aided digital pathology image analysis. Artif Intell Cancer 2020; 1:31-38. [DOI: 10.35713/aic.v1.i1.31] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2020] [Revised: 05/02/2020] [Accepted: 06/07/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Digital pathology image (DPI) analysis has been developed by machine learning (ML) techniques. However, little attention has been paid to the reproducibility of ML-based histological classification in heterochronously obtained DPIs of the same hematoxylin and eosin (HE) slide.
AIM To elucidate the frequency and preventable causes of discordant classification results of DPI analysis using ML for the heterochronously obtained DPIs.
METHODS We created paired DPIs by scanning 298 HE stained slides containing 584 tissues twice with a virtual slide scanner. The paired DPIs were analyzed by our ML-aided classification model. We defined non-flipped and flipped groups as the paired DPIs with concordant and discordant classification results, respectively. We compared differences in color and blur between the non-flipped and flipped groups by L1-norm and a blur index, respectively.
RESULTS We observed discordant classification results in 23.1% of the paired DPIs obtained by two independent scans of the same microscope slide. We detected no significant difference in the L1-norm of each color channel between the two groups; however, the flipped group showed a significantly higher blur index than the non-flipped group.
CONCLUSION Our results suggest that differences in the blur - not the color - of the paired DPIs may cause discordant classification results. An ML-aided classification model for DPI should be tested for this potential cause of the reduced reproducibility of the model. In a future study, a slide scanner and/or a preprocessing method of minimizing DPI blur should be developed.
Collapse
|
Basic Study |
5 |
1 |
6
|
Shao Y, Zhang YX, Chen HH, Lu SS, Zhang SC, Zhang JX. Advances in the application of artificial intelligence in solid tumor imaging. Artif Intell Cancer 2021; 2:12-24. [DOI: 10.35713/aic.v2.i2.12] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2021] [Revised: 04/02/2021] [Accepted: 04/20/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
|
Minireviews |
4 |
1 |
7
|
Wei Q, Fang ZY, Zhang ZM, Zhang TF. Therapeutic tumor vaccines — a rising star to benefit cancer patients. Artif Intell Cancer 2021; 2:25-41. [DOI: 10.35713/aic.v2.i3.25] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2021] [Revised: 05/11/2021] [Accepted: 06/22/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
|
Minireviews |
4 |
1 |
8
|
Tanabe S. How can artificial intelligence and humans work together to fight against cancer? Artif Intell Cancer 2020; 1:45-50. [DOI: 10.35713/aic.v1.i3.45] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2020] [Revised: 09/18/2020] [Accepted: 09/22/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
This editorial will focus on and discuss growing artificial intelligence (AI) and the utilization of AI in human cancer therapy. The databases and big data related to genomes, genes, proteins and molecular networks are rapidly increasing all worldwide where information on human diseases, including cancer and infection resides. To overcome diseases, prevention and therapeutics are being developed with the abundant data analyzed by AI. AI has so much potential for handling considerable data, which requires some orientation and ambition. Appropriate interpretation of AI is essential for understanding disease mechanisms and finding targets for prevention and therapeutics. Collaboration with AI to extract the essence of cancer data and model intelligent networks will be explored. The utilization of AI can provide humans with a predictive future in disease mechanisms and treatment as well as prevention.
Collapse
|
Editorial |
5 |
1 |
9
|
Coulouarn C. Artificial intelligence and omics in cancer. Artif Intell Cancer 2020; 1:1-7. [DOI: 10.35713/aic.v1.i1.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2020] [Revised: 06/09/2020] [Accepted: 06/12/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
|
Editorial |
5 |
|
10
|
Panarese A. Usefulness of artificial intelligence in early gastric cancer. Artif Intell Cancer 2022; 3:17-26. [DOI: 10.35713/aic.v3.i2.17] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2021] [Revised: 03/27/2022] [Accepted: 04/19/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Gastric cancer (GC) is a major cancer worldwide, with high mortality and morbidity. Endoscopy, important for the early detection of GC, requires trained skills, high-quality technologies, surveillance and screening programs. Early diagnosis allows a better prognosis, through surgical or curative endoscopic therapy. Magnified endoscopy with virtual chromoendoscopy remarkably improve the detection of early gastric cancer (EGC) when endoscopy is performed by expert endoscopists. Artificial intelligence (AI) has also been introduced to GC diagnostics to increase diagnostic efficiency. AI improves the early detection of gastric lesions because it supports the non-expert and experienced endoscopist in defining the margins of the tumor and the depth of infiltration. AI increases the detection rate of EGC, reduces the rate of missing tumors, and characterizes EGCs, allowing clinicians to make the best therapeutic decision, that is, one that ensures curability. AI has had a remarkable evolution in medicine in recent years, moving from the research phase to clinical practice. In addition, the diagnosis of GC has markedly progressed. We predict that AI will allow great evolution in the diagnosis and treatment of EGC by overcoming the variability in performance that is currently a limitation of chromoendoscopy.
Collapse
|
Minireviews |
3 |
|
11
|
Bredt LC, Peres LAB. Artificial neural network for prediction of acute kidney injury after liver transplantation for cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Artif Intell Cancer 2021; 2:51-59. [DOI: 10.35713/aic.v2.i5.51] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2021] [Revised: 10/22/2021] [Accepted: 10/27/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Acute kidney injury (AKI) has serious consequences on the prognosis of patients undergoing liver transplantation (LT) for liver cancer and cirrhosis. Artificial neural network (ANN) has recently been proposed as a useful tool in many fields in the setting of solid organ transplantation and surgical oncology, where patient prognosis depends on a multidimensional and nonlinear relationship between variables pertaining to the surgical procedure, the donor (graft characteristics), and the recipient comorbidities. In the specific case of LT, ANN models have been developed mainly to predict survival in patients with cirrhosis, to assess the best donor-to-recipient match during allocation processes, and to foresee postoperative complications and outcomes. This is a specific opinion review on the role of ANN in the prediction of AKI after LT for liver cancer and cirrhosis, highlighting potential strengths of the method to forecast this serious postoperative complication.
Collapse
|
Opinion Review |
4 |
|
12
|
Tombesi P, Cutini A, Grasso V, Di Vece F, Politti U, Capatti E, Labb F, Petaccia S, Sartori S. Past, present, and future perspectives of ultrasound-guided ablation of liver tumors: Where could artificial intelligence lead interventional oncology? Artif Intell Cancer 2024; 5:96690. [DOI: 10.35713/aic.v5.i1.96690] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2024] [Revised: 06/26/2024] [Accepted: 07/10/2024] [Indexed: 07/17/2024] [Imported: 07/17/2024] Open
Abstract
The first ablation procedures for small hepatocellular carcinomas were percutaneous ethanol injection under ultrasound (US) guidance. Later, radiofrequency ablation was shown to achieve larger coagulation areas than percutaneous ethanol injection and became the most used ablation technique worldwide. In the past decade, microwave ablation systems have achieved larger ablation areas than radiofrequency ablation, suggesting that the 3-cm barrier could be broken in the treatment of liver tumors. Likewise, US techniques to guide percutaneous ablation have seen important progress. Contrast-enhanced US (CEUS) can define and target the tumor better than US and can assess the size of the ablation area after the procedure, which allows immediate retreatment of the residual tumor foci. Furthermore, fusion imaging fuses real-time US images with computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging with significant improvements in detecting and targeting lesions with low conspicuity on CEUS. Recently, software powered by artificial intelligence has been developed to allow three-dimensional segmentation and reconstruction of the anatomical structures, aiding in procedure planning, assessing ablation completeness, and targeting the residual viable foci with greater precision than CEUS. Hopefully, this could lead to the ablation of tumors up to 5-7 cm in size.
Collapse
|
Editorial |
1 |
|
13
|
Abaach M, Morilla I. Learning models for colorectal cancer signature reconstruction and classification in patients with chronic inflammatory bowel disease. Artif Intell Cancer 2022; 3:27-41. [DOI: 10.35713/aic.v3.i2.27] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2021] [Revised: 02/16/2022] [Accepted: 04/28/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
|
Basic Study |
3 |
|
14
|
Shukla A, Chaudhary R, Nayyar N. Role of artificial intelligence in gastrointestinal surgery. Artif Intell Cancer 2024; 5. [DOI: 10.35713/aic.v5.i2.97317] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2024] [Revised: 07/11/2024] [Accepted: 07/17/2024] [Indexed: 09/05/2024] [Imported: 09/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Artificial intelligence is rapidly evolving and its application is increasing day-by-day in the medical field. The application of artificial intelligence is also valuable in gastrointestinal diseases, by calculating various scoring systems, evaluating radiological images, preoperative and intraoperative assistance, processing pathological slides, prognosticating, and in treatment responses. This field has a promising future and can have an impact on many management algorithms. In this minireview, we aimed to determine the basics of artificial intelligence, the role that artificial intelligence may play in gastrointestinal surgeries and malignancies, and the limitations thereof.
Collapse
|
Minireviews |
1 |
|
15
|
Hung CM, Shi HY, Lee PH, Chang CS, Rau KM, Lee HM, Tseng CH, Pei SN, Tsai KJ, Chiu CC. Potential and role of artificial intelligence in current medical healthcare. Artif Intell Cancer 2022; 3:1-10. [DOI: 10.35713/aic.v3.i1.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2021] [Revised: 12/31/2021] [Accepted: 02/20/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is defined as the digital computer or computer-controlled robot's ability to mimic intelligent conduct and crucial thinking commonly associated with intelligent beings. The application of AI technology and machine learning in medicine have allowed medical practitioners to provide patients with better quality of services; and current advancements have led to a dramatic change in the healthcare system. However, many efficient applications are still in their initial stages, which need further evaluations to improve and develop these applications. Clinicians must recognize and acclimate themselves with the developments in AI technology to improve their delivery of healthcare services; but for this to be possible, a significant revision of medical education is needed to provide future leaders with the required competencies. This article reviews the potential and limitations of AI in healthcare, as well as the current medical application trends including healthcare administration, clinical decision assistance, patient health monitoring, healthcare resource allocation, medical research, and public health policy development. Also, future possibilities for further clinical and scientific practice were also summarized.
Collapse
|
Minireviews |
3 |
|
16
|
Ramachandran A, Bhalla D, Rangarajan K, Pramanik R, Banerjee S, Arora C. Building and evaluating an artificial intelligence algorithm: A practical guide for practicing oncologists. Artif Intell Cancer 2022; 3:42-53. [DOI: 10.35713/aic.v3.i3.42] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2022] [Revised: 04/09/2022] [Accepted: 06/17/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The use of machine learning and deep learning has enabled many applications, previously thought of as being impossible. Among all medical fields, cancer care is arguably the most significantly impacted, with precision medicine now truly being a possibility. The effect of these technologies, loosely known as artificial intelligence, is particularly striking in fields involving images (such as radiology and pathology) and fields involving large amounts of data (such as genomics). Practicing oncologists are often confronted with new technologies claiming to predict response to therapy or predict the genomic make-up of patients. Underst-anding these new claims and technologies requires a deep understanding of the field. In this review, we provide an overview of the basis of deep learning. We describe various common tasks and their data requirements so that oncologists could be equipped to start such projects, as well as evaluate algorithms presented to them.
Collapse
|
Minireviews |
3 |
|
17
|
Santos-Buitrago B, Santos-García G, Hernández-Galilea E. Artificial intelligence for modeling uveal melanoma. Artif Intell Cancer 2020; 1:51-65. [DOI: 10.35713/aic.v1.i4.51] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2020] [Revised: 11/05/2020] [Accepted: 11/21/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
|
Minireviews |
5 |
|
18
|
Alloro R, Sinagra E. Artificial intelligence and colorectal cancer: How far can you go? Artif Intell Cancer 2021; 2:7-11. [DOI: 10.35713/aic.v2.i2.7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2021] [Revised: 04/01/2021] [Accepted: 04/20/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
|
Editorial |
4 |
|
19
|
Huang K, Wang YH. Application of retroperitoneal laparoscopy and robotic surgery in complex adrenal tumors. Artif Intell Cancer 2021; 2:42-48. [DOI: 10.35713/aic.v2.i3.42] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2021] [Revised: 05/17/2021] [Accepted: 06/18/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
As a surgical method for the treatment of adrenal surgical diseases, laparoscopy has the advantages of small trauma, short operation time, less bleeding, and fast postoperative recovery. It is considered as the gold standard for the treatment of adrenal surgical diseases. Retroperitoneal laparoscopy is widely used because it does not pass through the abdominal cavity, does not interfere with internal organs, and has little effect on gastrointestinal function. However, complex adrenal tumors have the characteristics of large volume, compression of adjacent tissues, and invasion of surrounding tissues, so they are rarely treated by retroperitoneal laparoscopy. In recent years, with the development of laparoscopic technology and the progress of surgical technology, robotic surgery has been gradually applied to the surgical treatment of complex adrenal tumors. This paper reviews the clinical application of retroperitoneal laparoscopic surgery and robotic surgery in the treatment of complex adrenal tumors.
Collapse
|
Minireviews |
4 |
|
20
|
Sun M, Yu J, Zhou JW, Ye M, Ye F, Ding M. Can ChatGPT and DeepSeek help cancer patients: A comparative study of artificial intelligence models in clinical decision support. Artif Intell Cancer 2025; 6:106356. [DOI: 10.35713/aic.v6.i1.106356] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2025] [Revised: 04/02/2025] [Accepted: 04/27/2025] [Indexed: 06/06/2025] [Imported: 06/06/2025] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cancer care faces challenges due to tumor heterogeneity and rapidly evolving therapies, necessitating artificial intelligence (AI)-driven clinical decision support. While general-purpose models like ChatGPT offer adaptability, domain-specific systems (e.g., DeepSeek) may better align with clinical guidelines. However, their comparative efficacy in oncology remains underexplored. This study hypothesizes that domain-specific AI will outperform general-purpose models in technical accuracy, while the latter will excel in patient-centered communication.
AIMS To compare ChatGPT and DeepSeek in oncology decision support for diagnosis, treatment, and patient communication.
METHODS A retrospective analysis was conducted using 1200 anonymized oncology cases (2018–2023) from The Cancer Genome Atlas and institutional databases, covering six cancer types. Each case included histopathology, imaging, genomic profiles, and treatment histories. Both models generated diagnostic interpretations, staging assessments, and therapy recommendations. Performance was evaluated against NCCN/ESMO guidelines and expert oncologist panels using F1-scores, Cohen's κ, Likert-scale ratings, and readability metrics. Statistical significance was assessed via analysis of variance and post-hoc Tukey tests.
RESULTS DeepSeek demonstrated superior performance in diagnostic accuracy (F1-score: 89.2% vs ChatGPT's 76.5%, P < 0.001) and treatment alignment with guidelines (κ = 0.82 vs 0.67, P = 0.003). ChatGPT exhibited strengths in patient communication, generating layman-friendly explanations (readability score: 8.2/10 vs DeepSeek's 6.5/10, P = 0.012). Both models showed limitations in rare cancer subtypes (e.g., cholangiocarcinoma), with accuracy dropping below 60%. Clinicians rated DeepSeek's outputs as more actionable (4.3/5 vs 3.7/5, P = 0.021) but highlighted ChatGPT's utility in palliative care discussions.
CONCLUSION Domain-specific AI (DeepSeek) excels in technical precision, while general-purpose models (ChatGPT) enhance patient engagement. A hybrid system integrating both approaches may optimize oncology workflows, contingent on expanded training for rare cancers and real-time guideline updates.
Collapse
|
Retrospective Study |
1 |
|
21
|
Yadav A, Kumar A. Artificial intelligence in rectal cancer: What is the future? Artif Intell Cancer 2023; 4:11-22. [DOI: 10.35713/aic.v4.i2.11] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2023] [Revised: 09/18/2023] [Accepted: 09/25/2023] [Indexed: 12/07/2023] [Imported: 12/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most prevalent cancer in both men and women, and it is the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths globally. Around 60%-70% of CRC patients are diagnosed at advanced stages, with nearly 20% having liver metastases. It is noteworthy that the 5-year survival rates decline significantly from 80%-90% for localized disease to a mere 10%-15% for patients with metastasis at the time of diagnosis. Early diagnosis, appropriate therapeutic strategy, accurate assessment of treatment response, and prognostication is essential for better outcome. There has been significant technological development in the last couple of decades to improve the outcome of rectal cancer including Artificial intelligence (AI). AI is a broad term used to describe the study of machines that mimic human intelligence, such as perceiving the environment, drawing logical conclusions from observations, and performing complex tasks. At present AI has demonstrated a promising role in early diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment outcomes for patients with rectal cancer, a limited role in surgical decision making, and had a bright future.
Collapse
|
Minireviews |
2 |
|
22
|
Wan XH. Artificial intelligence reveals roles of gut microbiota in driving human colorectal cancer evolution. Artif Intell Cancer 2021; 2:69-78. [DOI: 10.35713/aic.v2.i5.69] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2021] [Revised: 10/24/2021] [Accepted: 10/27/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
|
Minireviews |
4 |
|
23
|
Yang JS, Wang Q. How is artificial intelligence applied in solid tumor imaging? Artif Intell Cancer 2021; 2:49-50. [DOI: 10.35713/aic.v2.i4.49] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2021] [Revised: 06/21/2021] [Accepted: 07/22/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
|
Letter to the Editor |
4 |
|
24
|
Burati M, Tagliabue F, Lomonaco A, Chiarelli M, Zago M, Cioffi G, Cioffi U. Artificial intelligence as a future in cancer surgery. Artif Intell Cancer 2022; 3:11-16. [DOI: 10.35713/aic.v3.i1.11] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2021] [Revised: 12/24/2021] [Accepted: 01/17/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
|
Minireviews |
3 |
|
25
|
Morilla I. Repairing the human with artificial intelligence in oncology. Artif Intell Cancer 2021; 2:60-68. [DOI: 10.35713/aic.v2.i5.60] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2021] [Revised: 10/26/2021] [Accepted: 10/27/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
|
Minireviews |
4 |
|