Daikenchuto for postoperative adhesive small bowel obstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM

To assess the effectiveness of Daikenchuto for patients with postoperative adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO).

METHODS

A systematic search of PubMed (MEDLINE), CINAHL, the Cochrane Library and Ichushi Web was conducted, and the reference lists of review articles were hand-searched. The outcomes of interest were the incidence rate of surgery, the length of hospital days and mortality. The quality of the included studies, publication bias and between-study heterogeneity were also assessed.

RESULTS

Three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and three retrospective cohort studies were selected for analysis. In the three RCTs, Daikenchuto significantly reduced the incidence of surgery (pOR = 0.13; 95%CI: 0.03-0.50). Similarly, Daikenchuto significantly reduced the incidence of surgery (pOR = 0.53; 95%CI: 0.32-0.87) in the three cohort studies. The length of hospital stay and mortality were not measured or described consistently.

CONCLUSION

The present meta-analysis demonstrates that administering Daikenchuto is associated with a lower incidence of surgery for patients with postoperative ASBO in the Japanese population. In order to better generalize these results, additional studies will be needed.

Antibiotics for eradicating meningococcal carriages: Network meta-analysis and investigation of evidence inconsistency

AIM

To compare different antibiotics for eradicating the carriage of Neisseria meningitidis (N. meningitidis), and to investigate heterogeneity and evidence inconsistency.

METHODS

From a search of PubMed and published systematic reviews, we identified 23 trials evaluating 15 antibiotics that could be connected in a trial network. The outcome of interest is the eradication of N. meningitidis. We used WinBUGS to conduct random-effects, mixed treatment comparisons. Heterogeneity and evidence inconsistency was investigated by meta-regression modelling and examining characteristics of trial participants and interventions evaluated.

RESULTS

Rifampin, ciprofloxacin, minocycline, ceftriaxone, and azythromycin were statistically significantly (P < 0.05) more effective than placebo. The probability of being the best was 67.0% for a combination of rifampin and minocycline, 25.0% for ceftriaxone, 1.7% for azythromycin, and below 1% for the remaining regimens. Significant inconsistency between the direct and indirect estimates was observed for the comparison of rifampin and ciprofloxacin (P < 0.01), which may be caused by different types of carriers and different doses of ciprofloxacin.

CONCLUSION

A range of prophylactic antibiotic regimens are effective for eradicating meningococcal carriages, and treatment choice will depend on the individual priorities of the patients and physicians. In clinical situations where complete eradication is considered to be of the utmost importance, a combination of rifampin and minocycline seems to offer the highest likelihood of success. Ceftriaxone as a single intramuscular injection is also likely to be more effective as compared with the other two antibiotics (ciprofloxacin or rifampin) recommended by the current guidelines.

Efficacy, safety, and dose comparison of degarelix for the treatment of prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis into the efficacy, safety, and dosage regimens of degarelix for treating prostate cancer (PCa).

METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science was systematically searched to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing degarelix (240/80 mg vs 240/160 mg) to the gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists, goserelin and leuprolide, for the treatment of PCa. Two independent reviewers screened putative studies, assessed the risk of bias, and then extracted pertinent data. Analyses were performed using Review Manager 5.2.

RESULTS: Seven papers from six RCTs, involving 1204 patients, were identified. The present meta-analysis showed that treatment with 240/160 mg degarelix is more effective and has fewer adverse events (AEs) relative to conventional 240/80 mg regimen. Degarelix significantly decreased International Prostate Symptom Scores [standardized mean differences (SMD) = -0.32, 95%CI: -0.51 to -0.12, P = 0.02] and caused fewer AEs (SMD = -0.28, 95%CI: -0.48 to -0.07, P = 0.008) than goserelin. Degarelix suppressed testosterone and prostate-specific antigen significantly faster than leuprolide.

CONCLUSION: Degarelix is a useful option in the treatment of advanced PCa. Degarelix 240/160 mg regimen was superior to a 240/80 mg regimen. More rigorously designed RCTs are urgently needed to confirm the efficacy of degarelix.

Helicobacter pylori infection and asthma: Is there a direct or an inverse association? A meta-analysis

AIM: To analyze the consistency of a potential involvement of the bacterium infection in the asthma disease.

METHODS: A systematic literature search of the terms “Helicobacter pylori” (H. pylori) associated to “asthma” using PubMed, Scopus and the Cochrane Library Central was performed. Reference lists from published articles were also employed. Titles of these publications and their abstracts were scanned in order to eliminate duplicates and irrelevant articles. The criteria of inclusion of the studies were: Original studies; the H. pylori diagnostic method has been declared; all ranges of age have been included in our study; a definitive diagnosis of asthma has been reported.

RESULTS: We selected 14 articles in which the association between the two conditions was addressed. In 7 studies the prevalence of H. pylori infection in the asthma population and in the control population was made explicit. There was heterogeneity between the studies (Cohran’s Q = 0.02). The H. pylori infection in the asthma population resulted 33.6% (518 of 1542), while in the control population resulted 37.6% (2746 of 7310) (relative risk of H. pylori infection in the asthma population = 0.87, 95%CI: 0.72-1.05, P = 0.015, random effects model). Instead, considering the more virulent strains, the majority of studies showed an inverse relationship between the prevalence of H. pylori infection and asthma.

CONCLUSION: In our meta-analysis the prevalence of H. pylori infection in the asthma population resulted not statistically significant lower than in control population (P = 0.15). Instead, considering the more virulent strains, the majority of studies showed an inverse relationship between the prevalence of H. pylori infection and asthma.

Environmental tobacco smoke exposure and lung cancer: A systematic review

AIM: To review evidence relating passive smoking to lung cancer risk in never smokers, considering various major sources of bias.

METHODS: Epidemiological prospective or case-control studies were identified which provide estimates of relative risk (RR) and 95%CI for never smokers for one or more of seven different indices of exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS): The spouse; household; workplace; childhood; travel; social and other; and total. A wide range of study details were entered into a database, and the RRs for each study, including descriptions of the comparisons made, were entered into a linked database. RRs were derived where necessary. Results were entered, where available, for all lung cancer, and for squamous cell cancer and adenocarcinoma. “Most adjusted” results were entered based on results available, adjusted for the greatest number of potential confounding variables. “Least adjusted” results were also entered, with a preference for results adjusted at least for age for prospective studies. A pre-planned series of fixed-effects and random-effects meta-analyses were conducted. Overall analyses and analyses by continent were run for each exposure index, with results for spousal smoking given by sex, and results for childhood exposure given by source of ETS exposure. For spousal exposure, more extensive analyses provide results by various aspects of study design and definition of the RR. For smoking by the husband (or nearest equivalent), additional analyses were carried out both for overall risk, and for risk per 10 cigarettes per day smoked by the husband. These adjusted for uncontrolled confounding by four factors (fruit, vegetable and dietary fat consumption, and education), and corrected for misclassification of smoking status of the wife. For the confounding adjustment, estimates for never smoking women were derived from publications on the relationship of the four factors to both lung cancer risk and at home ETS exposure, and on the correlations between the factors. The bias due to misclassification was calculated on the basis that the proportion of ever smokers denying smoking is 10% in Asian studies and 2.5% elsewhere, and that those who deny smoking have the same risk as those who admit it. This approach, justified in previous work, balances higher true denial rates and lower risk in deniers compared to non-deniers.

RESULTS: One hundred and two studies were identified for inclusion, published in 1981 onwards, 45 in Asia, 31 in North America, 21 in Europe, and five elsewhere. Eighty-five were of case-control design and 17 were prospective. Significant (P < 0.05) associations were noted, with random-effects of (RR = 1.22, 95%CI: 1.14-1.31, n = 93) for smoking by the husband (RR = 1.14, 95%CI: 1.01-1.29, n = 45) for smoking by the wife (RR = 1.22, 95%CI: 1.15-1.30, n = 47) for workplace exposure (RR = 1.15, 95%CI: 1.02-1.29, n = 41) for childhood exposure, and (RR = 1.31, 95%CI: 1.19-1.45, n = 48) for total exposure. No significant association was seen for ETS exposure in travel (RR = 1.34, 95%CI: 0.94-1.93, n = 8) or in social situations (RR = 1.01, 95%CI: 0.82-1.24, n = 15). A significant negative association (RR = 0.78, 95%CI: 0.64-0.94, n = 8) was seen for ETS exposure in childhood, specifically from the parents. Significant associations were also seen for spousal smoking for both squamous cell carcinoma (RR = 1.44, 95%CI: 1.15-1.80, n = 24) and adenocarcinoma (RR = 1.33, 95%CI: 1.17-1.51, n = 30). Results generally showed marked heterogeneity between studies. For smoking by either the husband or wife, where 119 RR estimates gave an overall estimate of (RR = 1.21, 95%CI: 1.14-1.29), the heterogeneity was highly significant (P < 0.001), with evidence that the largest RRs were seen in studies published in 1981-89, in small studies (1-49 cases), and for estimates unadjusted by age. For smoking by the husband, the additional analyses showed that adjustment for the four factors reduced the overall (RR = 1.22, 95%CI: 1.14-1.31) based on 93 estimates to (RR = 1.14, 95%CI: 1.06-1.22), implying bias due to uncontrolled confounding of 7%. Further correction for misclassification reduced the estimate to a marginally non-significant (RR = 1.08, 95%CI: 0.999-1.16). In the fully adjusted and corrected analyses, there was evidence of an increase in Asia (RR = 1.18, 95%CI: 1.07-1.30, n = 44), but not in other regions (RR = 0.96, 95%CI: 0.86-1.07, n = 49). Studies published in the 1980’s, studies providing dose-response data, and studies only providing results unadjusted for age showed elevated RRs, but later published studies, studies not providing dose-response data, and studies adjusting for age did not. The pattern of results for RRs per 10 cigs/d was similar, with no significant association in the adjusted and corrected results (RR = 1.03, 95%CI: 0.994-1.07).

CONCLUSION: Most, if not all, of the ETS/lung cancer association can be explained by confounding adjustment and misclassification correction. Any causal relationship is not convincingly demonstrated.

Computed tomography fluoroscopy guided percutaneous lung biopsy for ground-glass opacity pulmonary lesions: A meta-analysis

AIM: To obtain the diagnostic performance of percutaneous transthoracic needle biopsy (PTNB) under Computed tomography (CT) fluoroscopy guidance for lung ground-glass opacity (GGO).

METHODS: We searched for English- and Chinese-language studies in PubMed, EMBASE, EBSCO, OVID, and CNKI (China National Knowledge Infrastructure) database. Data were calculated with Meta-Disc version 1.4 and Rev Man version 5.2 software. From the pooled data, we calculated sensitivity (Sen), specificity (Spe), positive likelihood ratio (+LR), negative likelihood ratio (-LR), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR). Summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves were constructed and incidence of complications was recorded.

RESULTS: Four documents included in this present meta-analysis met the criteria for analysis. The pooled Sen, Spe, +LR, -LR and DOR with 95%CI were 0.91 (0.86-0.95), 1.0 (0.91-1.0), 18.64 (4.83-71.93), 0.11 (0.05-0.26) and 153.17 (30.78-762.33), respectively. The area under the SROC curve was 0.98. The incidence of pneumothorax and hemoptysis was 17.86%-51.80% and 10.50%-19.40%, respectively.

CONCLUSION: CT fluoroscopy-guided PTNB, which has an acceptable incidence of complications, can be used as a primary examination method for lung GGO, with moderate sensitivity and specificity.

Meta-analysis comparing differing methods of endoscopic therapy for colorectal lesions

AIM: To compare the outcomes of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) of colorectal lesions.

METHODS: An electronic systematic literature search of four computerized databases was performed in July 2014 identifying studies reporting the outcomes of colorectal ESD and EMR. The primary outcome measures were en-bloc resection rate, endoscopic clearance rate and lesion recurrence rate of the patients followed up. The secondary outcome was the complication rate (including bleeding, perforation and surgery post EMR or ESD rate). Statistical pooling and random effects modelling of the studies calculating risk difference, heterogeneity and assessment of bias and quality were performed.

RESULTS: Six observational studies reporting the outcomes of 1324 procedures were included. The en-bloc resection rate was 50% higher in the ESD group than in the EMR group (95%CI: 0.17-0.83, P < 0.0001, I² = 99.7%). Endoscopic clearance rates were also significantly higher in the ESD group (95%CI: -0.06-0.02, P < 0.0001, I² = 92.5%). The perforation rate was 7% higher in the ESD group than the EMR group (95%CI: 0.05-0.09, P > 0.05, I² = 41.1%) and the rate of recurrence was 50% higher in the EMR group than in the ESD group (95%CI: 0.20-0.79, P < 0.001, I² = 99.5%). Heterogeneity remained consistent when subgroup analysis of high quality studies was performed (with the exception of piecemeal resection rate), and overall effect sizes remained unchanged for all outcomes.

CONCLUSION: ESD demonstrates higher en-bloc resection rates and lower recurrence rates compared to colorectal EMR. Differences in outcomes may benefit from increased assessment through well-designed comparative studies.

Expression of epithelial cellular adhesion molecule in gastric cancer: A meta-analysis

AIM: To obtain an accurate evaluation of the association between high expression of epithelial cellular adhesion molecule (EpCAM) and gastric cancer (GC) risk.

METHODS: Studies that had examined the association between high expression of EpCAM and GC risk were identified by searching electronic databases PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane library and Chinese Biomedical Literature database. Risk ratios (RRs) together with their 95%CIs were used to assess the association between high expression of EpCAM and GC risk. We selected eligible studies based on inclusion criteria. RevMan 5.3 software was used to calculate the pooled values.

RESULTS: A total of 14 studies were included in this meta-analysis. EpCAM-positive cases were significantly associated with tumor size (RR: 1.68, 95%CI: 1.47-1.91, P < 0.00001 fixed-effect), depth of invasion (RR: 1.37, 95%CI: 1.11-1.68, P = 0.003 random-effect), TNM stage (RR: 2.02, 95%CI: 1.35-3.02, P = 0.0007 random-effect), tumor location (RR: 0.80, 95%CI: 0.71-0.91, P = 0.0007 fixed-effect), histologic differentiation (RR: 1.23, 95%CI: 1.13-1.33, P < 0.00001 fixed-effect) and lymph node metastasis (RR: 1.89, 95%CI: 1.28-2.80, P = 0.001 random-effect). However, we did not observe any significant association between the presence of EpCAM with age, gender, distant metastasis, Borrmann type or Lauren classification. Additionally, EpCAM expression was not associated with the overall survival rate. The pooled HR of the overall effect was 1.39 (95%CI: 0.30-6.48, P = 0.67 random-effect).

CONCLUSION: Our meta-analysis indicates that EpCAM contributes to GC risk, which acts as a prognostic factor and a marker of poor outcome.

Role of self-expanding metal stents in patients with malignant colorectal obstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM: To assess the safety and efficacy of self-expandable metal stents (SEMSs) for malignant colorectal obstruction.

METHODS: Data regarding technical success, clinical success, and procedure related complications were collected from included studies. DerSimonian-Laird random effects model was used to generate the overall outcome. Thirty international studies with a total of 2058 patients with malignant colorectal obstruction were included.

RESULTS: The technical and clinical success rates for SEMS placement were 94% (95%CI: 92-96) and 91% (95%CI: 88-93), respectively. Overall complication rate for SEMS was 23% (95%CI: 18-29). Stent migration 8% (95%CI: 6-10) and stent obstruction 8% (95%CI: 6-11) were the most common complications, followed by perforation 5% (95%CI: 4%-7%). Surgical or endoscopic re-interventions were needed in 14% (95%CI: 10-18) of patients. Endoscopic repeat stent placement was required in 8% (95%CI: 6-10), while surgical intervention was needed in 6% (95%CI: 4-8).

CONCLUSION: SEMS are effective when used as palliation or bridge to surgery for malignant colorectal obstruction with high technical and clinical success. About 14% of patients require repeat endoscopic or surgical intervention for stent failure or to manage stent related complications.

Risk of pancreatic adverse events associated with the use of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor drugs: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials

AIM: To systematically assess risk of pancreatic adverse events with glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor drugs.

METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane review of clinical trials, pharmaceutical company clinical trials register, United States Food and Drug Administration website, European Medicines Agency website and ClinicalTrials.gov for randomized controlled trials from inception to October 2013. Randomized control trial studies were selected for inclusion if they reported on pancreatic complication events and/or changes in pancreatic enzyme levels (serum amylase and serum lipase) as adverse events or as serious adverse events for patients who were on GLP-1 receptor agonist and DPP-4 inhibitor drugs. Two independent reviewers extracted data directly. We performed Peto odds ratio (OR) fixed effect meta-analysis of pancreatic adverse events a, and assessed heterogeneity with the I² statistic.

RESULTS: Sixty-eight randomized controlled trials were eligible. A total of 60720 patients were included in our analysis of the association of risk of pancreatic complication events with GLP-1 agents. A total of 89 pancreatic related adverse events occurred among the GLP-1 agents compared to 74 events among the controls. There was a statistically significant increased risk of elevation of pancreatic enzymes associated with GLP-1 agents compared with control (Peto OR = 3.15, 95%CI: 1.56-6.39, P = 0.001, I² = 0%). There was no statistically significant difference in the risk of pancreatic adverse event associated with GLP-1 agent compared with controls (Peto OR = 1.00, 95%CI: 0.73-1.37, P = 1.00, I² = 0%). There were a total of 71 pancreatitis events in patients on GLP-1 agents and 56 pancreatitis events occurred in the control patients. There were 36 reports of pancreatic cancer in these studies. Of these cases, 2 used linagliptin, 2 used alogliptin, 1 used vildagliptin, 7 used saxagliptin while 6 used sitagliptin. The remaining 18 cases occurred among controls.

CONCLUSION: Although GLP-1 based agents are associated with pancreatic enzyme elevation, we were unable to confirm a significant risk of pancreatitis or pancreatic cancer.

Towards better meta-analyses in assisted reproductive technology: Fixed, random or multivariate models?

AIM: To study the validity of the fixed, random, and multivariate meta-analytical models applied in meta-analyses in artificial reproduction technique.

METHODS: Based on common characteristics of in vitro fertilization (IVF) meta-analyses, we simulated a large number of data to compare results issued from the fixed model (FM) with the random model (RM). For multiple endpoints meta-analysis (MA), we compared the univariate RM with the multivariate model (MM). Finally, we illustrate our findings in re-analyzing a recent MA.

RESULTS: In our review, although a homogeneous effect was excluded in 89% of the MAs (11%), FM was utilized in 41 studies (82%). From simulations, a concordance of 59% ± 6% was found between the two tests, with up to 65% of falsely significant results with FM. The Q-test on studies characterized by substantial heterogeneity falsely accepted homogeneity in 46% of studies. Comparing separate univariate RM and MM on multiple endpoints studies, MM reduces the between endpoint discrepancy (BED) of 68%, and increases the power of 57% ± 8%. In the example dealing with the controversial effect of luteneizing hormone supplementation to follicle stimulating hormone during ovarian stimulation in IVF cycles, MM reduced BED by 66%, and consistent effects were found for all the endpoints, irrespective of partial reporting.

CONCLUSION: The FM generally may produce falsely significant differences. The RM should always be used. For multiple endpoints, the MM constitutes the best option.

Antireflux surgery vs medical treatment for gastroesophageal reflux disease: A meta-analysis

AIM: To compare the effect of antireflux surgery with medicine in treating gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) patients using meta- analysis.

METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Library were searched. We only included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the effect of surgical intervention with medical therapy for GERD. Statistical analyses were performed using RevMan 5.2 and STATA 12.0 software. RevMan 5.2 was used to assess the risk of bias and calculate the pooled effect size, while Stata 12.0 was used to evaluate publication bias and for sensitivity analysis. We evaluated the primary outcomes with GERD-/health-related quality of life in short (one to three years) and long (three to twelve years) periods of follow-up. Secondary outcomes evaluated were DeMeester scores and the percentage of time that pH < 4 to evaluate the degree of acid exposure.

RESULTS: This meta-analysis included 7 studies with 1972 patients. It showed a positive effect of antireflux surgery compared with medical treatment in terms of health-related quality of life [standardized mean difference (SMD) = 0.18; 95%CI: 0.01 to 0.34] and GERD-related quality of life (SMD = 0.35; 95%CI: 0.11 to 0.59). We also conducted the subgroup analyses based on follow-up periods and found that surgery remained more effective than medicine over the short to medium follow-up time, but the advantage of antireflux surgery probably not maintained for long time. GERD-related quality of life in the surgical group was significantly higher than medical group for the < 3 years follow-up (SMD = 0.45; 95%CI: 0.23 to 0.66); the difference was not statistically significant when the follow-up time was ≥ 3 years (SMD = 0.30; 95%CI: -0.10 to 0.69). Meta-analysis showed a statistically significant difference between the surgical group and medical group in the percentage of time that pH < 4 (SMD = 0.38; 95%CI: 0.14 to 0.61). Meta-analysis indicated a positive effect of antireflux surgery compared with medical treatment concerning DeMeester scores (SMD = 0.32; 95%CI: 0.00 to 0.65).

CONCLUSION: Although both were effective, in some respects surgical intervention was more effective than medical therapy to treat GERD when follow-up time was up to three years.

Radiofrequency ablation with or without transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM: To determine whether combined transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) improve overall and recurrence-free survival (RFS) compared with RFA alone.

METHODS: We reviewed randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing overall survival rate as well as recurrence-free rate for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) between TACE-RFA therapy and RFA alone published before April 2015 by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eligible studies were identified by searching PubMed and EMBASE up to April 2015. Additional studies were retrieved via China Medical Collections, Google Scholar or a hand review of the reference lists of the retrieved articles. The summarized relative risks (RRs) with their 95%CIs were estimated using random-effects model. I² statistic was calculated to measure the heterogeneity of RRs across studies and Cochran’s Q test was used to test the statistical significance accordingly. Publication bias was assessed primarily based on visual assessment using a funnel plot, and secondly by using Egger’s regression asymmetry test or Begg’s rank correlation test as appropriate. Meta-regression was implemented to examine potential effect modifiers.

RESULTS: Nine single-center RCTs conducted in China and Japan were included, with a total of 618 patients with HCC; 321 of whom (51.9%) received TACE/RFA therapy and 297 received RFA alone. The pooled RRs with corresponding CIs comparing combined TACE/RFA to RFA alone were 1.12 (1.004-1.26) and 1.20 (1.02-1.41) for 1-year and 3-year survival rates, respectively. Similar positive associations were found for 1-year (1.19; 1.05-1.35) and 3-year (1.44; 1.00-2.07) RFS. The beneficial effect was more evident in patients with medium-sized (3-5 cm) tumors and among the Chinese population.

CONCLUSION: Combined TACE/RFA has a beneficial effect on survival and recurrence rates compared with RFA alone, especially for medium-sized HCC and among Chinese patients.

Traditional Chinese manual acupuncture for management of obesity: A systematic review

AIM: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of acupuncture for the treatment of obesity by reviewing currently available randomised controlled trials.

METHODS: This review followed the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Fifteen English and three Chinese databases were searched from their respective inceptions until July 2014. Key words used in the search consisted of acupuncture, needles, obesity, overweight, randomised trial and their synonyms. The risk of bias of included studies was assessed. The differences in effect size between acupuncture and control (including sham, no treatment, western medicine and dietary therapy/exercise) groups were compared using Cochrane Collaboration’s RevMan 5.3 software.

RESULTS: Two thousand six hundred and twenty-one records were identified; after full-text articles assessed for eligibility, 9 of them met inclusion criteria. Majority of included studies had unclear or high risk of bias across all domains. All included studies had high or unclear risk of bias in randomisation, blinding and outcome data. Meta-analysis showed that acupuncture was more effective for reducing body weight and body mass index than no treatment group. Manual acupuncture was also superior to dietary therapy alone for decreasing body weight. With dietary therapy as co-intervention, combined acupuncture group achieved lower body mass index than combined sham acupuncture group or dietary therapy alone group at the end of treatment period. No severe adverse events from acupuncture group were reported from all included studies.

CONCLUSION: Due to the poor quality of included studies the effectiveness of acupuncture cannot be concluded. Better-designed, large-scale, randomised, sham-controlled clinical trials with long-term follow-up are needed.

How to impute study-specific standard deviations in meta-analyses of skewed continuous endpoints?

AIM: To compare four methods to approximate mean and standard deviation (SD) when only medians and interquartile ranges are provided.

METHODS: We performed simulated meta-analyses on six datasets of 15, 30, 50, 100, 500, and 1000 trials, respectively. Subjects were iteratively generated from one of the following seven scenarios: five theoretical continuous distributions [Normal, Normal (0, 1), Gamma, Exponential, and Bimodal] and two real-life distributions of intensive care unit stay and hospital stay. For each simulation, we calculated the pooled estimates assembling the study-specific medians and SD approximations: Conservative SD, less conservative SD, mean SD, or interquartile range. We provided a graphical evaluation of the standardized differences. To show which imputation method produced the best estimate, we ranked those differences and calculated the rate at which each estimate appeared as the best, second-best, third-best, or fourth-best.

RESULTS: Our results demonstrated that the best pooled estimate for the overall mean and SD was provided by the median and interquartile range (mean standardized estimates: 4.5 ± 2.2, P = 0.14) or by the median and the SD conservative estimate (mean standardized estimates: 4.5 ± 3.5, P = 0.13). The less conservative approximation of SD appeared to be the worst method, exhibiting a significant difference from the reference method at the 90% confidence level. The method that ranked first most frequently is the interquartile range method (23/42 = 55%), particularly when data were generated according to the Standard Normal, Gamma, and Exponential distributions. The second-best is the conservative SD method (15/42 = 36%), particularly for data from a bimodal distribution and for the intensive care unit stay variable.

CONCLUSION: Meta-analytic estimates are not significantly affected by approximating the missing values of mean and SD with the correspondent values for median and interquartile range.

Brassiere wearing and breast cancer risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM: To evaluate existing evidence for the association between different type of brassiere exposures and the risk of breast cancer.

METHODS: Ovid Medline, CINAHL, Cochrane Data Base of Systematic Reviews, Pubmed, Scopus, Proquest, Sciencedirect, Wiley Online Library, WanFang Data, Hong Kong Index to Chinese Periodicals, China Journal Net, Chinese Medical Current Contents, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, China Academic Journals Full-Text database, Taiwan Electronic Periodical Services and HyRead; reference lists of published studies; original research studies published in English or Chinese examining the association between type and duration of brassiere-wearing and breast cancer risk. Data were abstracted by a first reviewer and verified by a second. Study quality was rated according to predefined criteria. “Fair” or “good” quality studies were included. Results were summarised by meta-analysis whenever adequate material was available.

RESULTS: Twelve case-control studies were included in the review. Meta-analysis showed brassiere wearing during sleep was associated with a two times of increased odds.

CONCLUSION: The present review demonstrates insufficient evidence to establish a positive association between the duration and type of brassiere wearing and breast cancer. Further research is essential; specifically, a large-scale epidemiological study of a better design is needed to examine the association between various forms of brassiere exposure in detail and breast cancer risk, with adequate control of confounding variables.

Application of meta-analysis to specific research fields: Lessons learned

Scientific research is challenged to translate findings from multiple, often conflicting, clinical trials into a simple answer of whether a treatment works or not. The public and healthcare providers alike frequently voice their frustrations when the media reports a treatment working on one day, but seemingly the next day reports a study refuting the previous one. Meta-analyses are being used more commonly by researchers to convey an understandable summary of scientific studies to the general public and healthcare providers. As time goes by, we have learned how to improve meta-analytic techniques to reflect more valid results and when it is appropriate to pool or not to pool results from different studies. Retrospective reviews often don’t acknowledge this learning curve and may fail to recommend the most current valid guidelines. This editorial presents an example of how the current use of meta-analysis has shifted in one field (the therapeutic effects of probiotics) and recommendations on how to correctly interpret the results of such an analysis.

Sleep-associated movement disorders and the risk of cardiovascular disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM: To investigate whether an association exists between sleep-associated movement disorders and cardiovascular disease (CVD).

METHODS: Several studies have observed the relationship of sleep-associated movement disorders such as restless legs syndrome (RLS) and periodic limb movements during sleep with CVD, but the results were still contradictory. We performed an extensive literature search on PubMed, Medline and Web of Science published from inception to December 2014. Additional studies were manually searched from bibliographies of retrieved studies. Meta-analyses were conducted with Stata version 12.0 (Stata Corp, College Station, Texas). Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95%CIs were calculated to assess the strength of association using the random effects model. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses were performed to explore the underlying sources of heterogeneity. The publication bias was detected using Egger’s test and Begg’s test.

RESULTS: A total of 781 unique citations were indentified from electronic databases and 13 articles in English were finally selected. Among these studies, nine are cohort studies; two are case-control studies; and two are cross-sectional studies. The results showed that the summary OR of CVD associated with sleep-associated movement was 1.51 (95%CI: 1.29-1.77) in a random-effects model. There was significant heterogeneity between individual studies (P for heterogeneity = 0.005, I² = 57.6%). Further analysis revealed that a large-scale cohort study may account for this heterogeneity. A significant association was also found between RLS and CVD (OR = 1.54, 95%CI: 1.24-1.92). In a fixed-effects model, we determined a significant relationship between sleep-associated movement disorders and coronary artery disease (CAD) (OR = 1.34, 95%CI: 1.16-1.54; P for heterogeneity = 0.210; I² = 30.0%). Our meta-analysis suggests that sleep-associated movement disorders are associated with prevalence of CVD and CAD.

CONCLUSION: This finding indicates that sleep-associated movement disorders may prove to be predictive of underlying CVD.

Effectiveness of 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine: A meta-analysis of post-marketing studies

AIM: To investigate the 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV7) effectiveness.

METHODS: A systematic literature review of studies which evaluated the effectiveness of PCV7 vaccine was performed searching the keyword “heptavalent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine” in PubMed and Scopus until March 16, 2013. The selection of potential eligible articles was done by two researchers independently on the basis of abstract and title and only post-marketing studies were included in the systematic review. Data extraction was carried out by two researchers with respect to invasive pneumococcal diseases due to both all and vaccine serotypes in pre-vaccine and post-vaccine periods in children less than 5 years. Results of studies which were considered suitable for meta-analysis were combined by means of relative risk (RR) with 95%CI. Vaccine effectiveness was calculated as (1-RR) × 100. Heterogeneity was assessed by I² and a random effects model was used to combine data in the case of heterogeneity. RevMan 5 was used to pool data.

RESULTS: On the whole, 757 eligible papers were identified from the literature search in PubMed and Scopus. Of them, 62 were finally considered in the systematic review and 38 were included in the meta-analysis. In all post-marketing studies included in the systematic review the incidence of invasive pneumococcal diseases due to vaccine serotypes declined significantly with the exception of few studies showing stability or a slight, but not significant, increase. Furthermore most of studies highlighted also a reduction in the incidence of invasive pneumococcal diseases due to all serotypes. With regards to meta-analysis, a random effects model was used to combine data because of the high heterogeneity. Data combination showed that the effectiveness of PCV7 in reducing invasive pneumococcal diseases due to vaccine serotypes and to all serotypes was 84% (95%CI: 74%-90%) and 53% (95%CI: 46%-59%) respectively. These results are confirmatory with respect to the efficacy of PCV7 against invasive pneumococcal diseases due to vaccine serotypes.

CONCLUSION: PCV7 implementation determines a significant decrease of invasive pneumococcal diseases.

Evolving role of salvage reirradiation: Is global harmonization required before treatment guidelines can be developed?

Up to 90% of patients initially treated with curative-intent radiotherapy (RT) will experience locoregional failure. Historically, reirradiation (ReRT) was offered purely with palliative intent, if considered at all, due to concerns surrounding toxicity, tolerance of normal tissues, and choice of appropriate dose schedule. With technological advancements in RT delivery, coupled with longer survival in many malignancies secondary to improvements in systemic therapy, a small subset of patients presenting with localized recurrence is increasingly being offered salvage ReRT. However, this is largely on an ad hoc basis, guided mainly by small retrospective, single-institution reports. The patient population retreated, RT modality, dose received, degree of attrition and follow-up are extremely variable. The opportunity presently exists to apply lessons learned from the harmonization of the research efforts within the bone metastases community to the salvage ReRT situation: the adoption of common endpoints, minimum features to be incorporated into clinical trial design, and methods of data analysis and reporting. The ReRT data available must be harmonized so that valid, clinically applicable conclusions can be drawn. Collaboration in the form of an international registry of prospectively collected outcomes of patients reirradiated for cure for a variety of tumour sites would further support the evolution of Radiation Oncology towards personalized medicine, and away from the current “one-dose-fits-all” approach.

Is the traditional Chinese medicine helpful for patients with hematologic malignant diseases? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) for the treatment of hematologic malignant diseases.

METHODS: We searched the Cochrane CENTRAL, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, AMED, CNKI, Wanfang Platform; China Sinomed and the clinical trial registry web sites and Googlescholar electronically up to June 19^th, 2014 and hand searched related publications. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) researching on whether TCM as the adjuvant treatment improved the effect for hematologic malignant diseases were included. Two reviewers extracted data and evaluated the studies independently. Pooled risk ratios (RR) were calculated as outcome measures. Our primary outcomes were the overall response (OR) rate.

RESULTS: We retrieved 13143 references and included 11 RCTs involved 891 participants after screening. Because the non-significant heterogeneity we used the fixed effect model to combine data and TCM had a significantly higher OR and CR (complete response) rates than the control [RR = 1.17, 95%CI: (1.10, 1.25), P < 0.00001; RR = 1.24, 95%CI: (1.11, 1.37), P < 0.0001, respectively]. Only three studies included in the survival rate analysis. We combined them with random effects model and there was no significant difference between the TCM and control arms. Because of the low heterogeneity we used the fixed effect model to combine the non-hematologic adverse effects (AEs) data. Our results showed that TCM significantly decreased non-hematologic AEs rates we researched, the gastrointestinal reaction [RR = 0.50, 95%CI: (0.37, 0.68), P < 0.0001], liver and/or kidney injury [RR = 0.37, 95%CI: (0.26, 0.53), P < 0.00001] and heart injury [RR = 0.24, 95%CI: (0.09, 0.68), P = 0.007]. Additionally, TCM had a trend to decrease the infection rate [RR = 0.16, (0.02, 1.12), P = 0.07], but not statistically significantly.

CONCLUSION: TCM increases OR and CR rates for hematologic malignances and reduces treatment associated serious non-hematologic AEs. Therefore, TCM should be included in the treatment of hematologic malignances.

Development of the Documentation and Appraisal Review Tool for systematic reviews

AIM: To develop a tool to more explicitly assess and document the quality of systematic reviews.

METHODS: We developed the Documentation and Appraisal Review Tool (DART) using epidemiologic principles of study design and the following resources: the modified Overview Quality Assessment Questionnaire (modified OQAQ), Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR), the Cochrane Handbook, and the standards promoted by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and the Institutes of Medicine (IOM). We designed the DART tool to include the following: more detail to provide guidance and improve standardization of use, an approach to assess quality of systematic reviews addressing a variety of research designs, and additional space for recording notes to facilitate recall. DART underwent multiple rounds of testing with methodologists of varying levels of training and experience. Based on the results of six phases of pilot testing, we revised DART to improve performance, clarity and consistency. Pilot testing also included comparisons between DART, and the two most commonly used tools to evaluate the quality of systematic reviews, the modified OQAQ and AMSTAR.

RESULTS: Compared to AMSTAR and modified OQAQ, DART includes two unique questions and several questions covered by modified OQAQ or AMSTAR but not both. Modified OQAQ and DART had the highest reporting consistency. Four AMSTAR questions were unclear and elicited inconsistent responses. Identifying reviewer rationale was most difficult using the modified OQAQ tool, and easiest using DART. DART allows for documentation of reviewer rationale, facilitating reconciliation between reviewers and documentation for future updates. DART also provides a comprehensive, systematic approach for reviewers with limited experience with systematic review methodology, to critically analyze systematic reviews. In addition, DART is the only one of the three tools to explicitly include quality review for biases specific to observational studies. This is now more widely recognized as important for assessing risk in order to generate recommendations that balance benefit to harm. The tool also includes the assessment of standards recommended by the March 2011 IOM Standards for Systematic Review.

CONCLUSION: This comprehensive tool improves upon existing tools for assessing the quality of systematic reviews and guides reviewers through critically analyzing a systematic review.

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses: Why are they clinically significant?

This review aims to clarify the clinical significance of systematic reviews and meta-analyses by illustrating several classical examples. Firstly, systematic reviews can provide the highest level of evidence for clinical decisions. Secondly, systematic reviews can propose unresolved issues and future directions. Thirdly, systematic reviews can avoid harm to the human body. Fourthly, systematic reviews can prevent a waste of resources. Generally speaking, clinical researchers should be encouraged to perform systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

Red meat intake and the risk of endometrial cancer: Meta-analysis of observational studies

AIM: To evaluate whether red meat intake is related to the risk of endometrial cancer (EC) using meta-analysis.

METHODS: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library up to June 2013, using common keywords related to red meat and EC. Case-control studies and cohort studies comparing the risk of endometrial cancer among categories by the amount of intake were included. Eleven case-control studies and five cohort studies met our criteria. We performed a conventional and a dose-response meta-analysis of case-control studies using the DerSimonian-Laird method for random-effects. For cohort studies we performed a conventional meta-analysis. Publication bias was evaluated using Egger’s test.

RESULTS: In the meta-analysis of 11 case-control studies including 5419 cases and 12654 controls, higher red meat consumption was associated with an increased risk of EC [summary relative risk (SRR) = 1.43, 95%CI: 1.15-1.79; I² = 73.3% comparing extreme intake categories). In a dose-response analysis, for red meat intake of 100 g/d, SRR was 1.84 (95%CI: 1.64-2.05). In contrast, in the meta-analysis of five prospective studies including a total of 2549 cases among 247746 participants, no significant association between red meat intake and EC risk (SRR = 0.97, 95%CI: 0.85-1.11; I² = 4.9% comparing extreme intake categories) was observed.

CONCLUSION: Our meta-analysis found a significant linear association between red meat intake and EC risk based on case-control studies but this was not confirmed in prospective studies.

Unsaturation index and type 2 diabetes: Unknown, unloved

A useful parameter for interpreting analyses of membrane fatty-acid composition is the unsaturation index (UI), a measure of unsaturation that is calculated as the mean number of cis double bonds per fatty-acid residue multiplied by 100. The UI is a fundamental parameter that contains information about many membrane biophysical properties and behavior. UI is a crucial index for type 2 diabetes (T2D) and other disorders, yet it is not properly considered in the scientific community. The goal of the present editorial is to familiarize the scientific T2D community with the UI. The idea of early systemic cell-membrane disease necessitates new thinking and suggests that UI should feature prominently on the research agenda.