The EURAP Study Group. Seizure control and treatment in pregnancy: observations from the EURAP epilepsy pregnancy registry

OBJECTIVE

To analyze seizure control and treatment in pregnant women with epilepsy.

METHODS

Seizure control and treatment were recorded prospectively in 1,956 pregnancies of 1,882 women with epilepsy participating in EURAP, an international antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) and pregnancy registry.

RESULTS

Of all cases, 58.3% were seizure-free throughout pregnancy. Occurrence of any seizures was associated with localization-related epilepsy (OR: 2.5; 1.7 to 3.9) and polytherapy (OR: 9.0; 5.6 to 14.8) and for tonic-clonic seizures, with oxcarbazepine monotherapy (OR: 5.4; 1.6 to 17.1). Using first trimester as reference, seizure control remained unchanged throughout pregnancy in 63.6%, 92.7% of whom were seizure-free during the entire pregnancy. For those with a change in seizure frequency, 17.3% had an increase and 15.9% a decrease. Seizures occurred during delivery in 60 pregnancies (3.5%), more commonly in women with seizures during pregnancy (OR: 4.8; 2.3 to 10.0). There were 36 cases of status epilepticus (12 convulsive), which resulted in stillbirth in one case but no cases of miscarriage or maternal mortality. AED treatment remained unchanged in 62.7% of the pregnancies. The number or dosage of AEDs were more often increased in pregnancies with seizures (OR: 3.6; 2.8 to 4.7) and with monotherapy with lamotrigine (OR: 3.8; 2.1 to 6.9) or oxcarbazepine (OR: 3.7; 1.1 to 12.9).

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of patients with epilepsy maintain seizure control during pregnancy. The apparently higher risk of seizures among women treated with oxcarbazepine and the more frequent increases in drug load in the oxcarbazepine and lamotrigine cohorts prompts further studies on relationships with pharmacokinetic changes. Risks associated with status epilepticus appear to be lower than previously reported.

Safety and efficacy of vigabatrin and carbamazepine in newly diagnosed epilepsy: a multicentre randomised double-blind study. Vigabatrin European Monotherapy Study Group

BACKGROUND

Vigabatrin is a newly licensed drug for use in patients with epilepsy. We investigated whether this drug was comparable to standard first-line monotherapy in efficacy and incidence of adverse events.

METHODS

We enrolled 459 patients with newly diagnosed, previously untreated partial epileptic seizures from 44 European centres and randomly assigned them carbamazepine 600 mg daily (n=230) or vigabatrin 2 g daily (n=229). After initial maintenance doses were reached, doses were adjusted downwards (in the case of adverse events) or upwards (in the case of seizures) by the clinician. The primary outcome was time to withdrawal because of lack of efficacy or adverse events. Secondary outcomes included efficacy (time to 6-month remission of seizures, time to first seizure after initial dose stabilisation), and adverse events (incidence and severity). Analysis was by intention to treat.

FINDINGS

Time to withdrawal for lack of efficacy or adverse events did not differ between groups (p=0.318). Vigabatrin was better tolerated than carbamazepine with fewer withdrawals, but was more frequently associated with psychiatric symptoms (58 [25%] vs 34 [15%]) and weight gain (25 [11%] vs 12 [5%]). Carbamazepine was associated with rash (22 [10%] vs seven [3%]). All efficacy outcomes favoured carbamazepine and failed to show equivalence between the two drugs. No significant difference was found for time to achieve 6 months of remission from seizures (p=0.058), but the most powerful outcome, time to first seizure after the first 6 weeks from randomisation, showed carbamazepine to be significantly more effective than vigabatrin (p=0.0001).

INTERPRETATION

Vigabatrin seems less effective but better tolerated than carbamazepine, which is the first-choice drug for the treatment of partial epilepsies. Vigabatrin cannot therefore be recommended as a first-line drug for monotherapy in this group of patients.

Double-blind, placebo controlled, crossover study of lamotrigine in treatment resistant partial seizures

The results of a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo controlled, crossover trial of lamotrigine as add-on therapy in patients with partial seizures poorly controlled by established antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are presented. The study consisted of two 12 week treatment periods each followed by a four week washout period. During the lamotrigine treatment phase, patients received 150 mg or 300 mg daily dose depending on their concomitant AEDs to achieve concentrations in the range 1-3 mg/L. Forty one patients were entered at four centres and all patients entered completed the study. There was a highly significant (p < 0.001) decrease in total seizure counts on lamotrigine compared with placebo. Overall, 22% of patients experienced at least a 50% reduction in the total numbers of all seizures types on lamotrigine, compared with none on placebo. When the total numbers of partial seizures (simple and complex partial) were analysed there was also a significant (p < 0.05) reduction in seizure counts on lamotrigine compared with placebo. When total numbers of secondarily generalised seizures were compared the trend for a reduction in this seizure type did not achieve significance (0.05 < p < 0.1). Concomitant AED plasma concentrations were virtually unchanged. It is concluded that lamotrigine is an effective AED in the treatment of therapy-resistant partial seizures.

Gabapentin in the prophylaxis of chronic daily headache: a randomized, placebo-controlled study

OBJECTIVE

To compare efficacy and safety of gabapentin (GPT) versus placebo for prophylaxis of chronic daily headache (CDH) (headache at least 15 days/month of greater than 4 hours duration over preceding 6 months).

METHODS

This is a multicenter randomized placebo-controlled crossover study. After 4-week baseline, subjects, aged 18 to 65, were randomized to GPT 2,400 mg/day or placebo. There was 2 weeks titration, 6-week stable dosage, and 1 week washout period between treatment arms. The primary efficacy measure was the difference between the percentage of headache-free days per treatment period. Secondary efficacy measures included headache duration and severity, degree of disability, associated symptoms, concomitant medications, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores, and quality of life (QOL).

RESULTS

A total of 133 patients were enrolled (41 men, 92 women, mean age 43 years). All were eligible for safety analysis. Ninety-five received sufficient treatment to allow evaluation of efficacy. There was a 9.1% difference in headache-free rates favoring GPT over placebo (p = 0.0005). Benefits for GPT were also demonstrated for headache-free days/month (p = 0.0005), severity (p = 0.03), VAS (p = 0.0006), headache-associated symptoms of nausea (p = 0.03) and photophobia/phonophobia (p = 0.04), disability affecting normal activities (p = 0.02), attacks requiring bed rest (p = 0.001), and QOL related to bodily function (p = 0.01), health/vitality (p = 0.0001), social function (p = 0.006), and health transition (p = 0.0002). Reduction in headache days/month was seen across the spectrum of prerandomization headache frequencies.

CONCLUSION

Gabapentin represents a therapeutic option for chronic daily headache.

Double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study of lamotrigine in treatment-resistant generalised epilepsy

PURPOSE

Lamotrigine (LTG) is recognised as effective add-on therapy for focal epilepsies, but this is the first double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study in treatment-resistant generalised epilepsy.

METHODS

The study consisted of 2 x 8-week treatment periods followed by a 4-week washout period. Patients received doses of either 75 or 150 mg daily, depending on their concomitant antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Long-term continuation was offered at the end of the study with open-label LTG.

RESULTS

Five centres in Australia recruited 26 patients who were having absence, myoclonic, or generalized tonic-clonic seizures or a combination of these. Twenty-two patients completed the study. There was a significant reduction in frequency of both tonic-clonic and absence seizure types with LTG. A 350% decrease in seizures was observed for tonic-clonic seizures in 50% of cases and for absence seizures in 33% of evaluable cases. Rash was the only adverse effect causing discontinuation. Twenty-three of 26 opted for open-label LTG, with 20 still receiving LTG for a mean of 26 months. In these 20, 80% had > or =50% seizure reduction and five (25%) were seizure free.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that LTG is effective add-on therapy in patients with refractory generalised epilepsies. Statistically significant reduction in seizures in both absence and tonic-clonic seizure types was seen even with low doses of LTG.

Epilepsy stigma: what do we know and where next?

Stigma is a major issue for people who develop epilepsy. Reducing stigma is a major focus of activity for the epilepsy patient support groups globally. In this paper, we introduce some key ideas and debates about the nature of and drivers for the stigma of epilepsy, including recent arguments about the need to frame analyses of the nature of epilepsy stigma within sociological debates about conflict and power. We then consider the role of the legislative process for redressing power imbalances that promote or maintain epilepsy stigma; and the value of tailored educational campaigns and programmes directed at stigma reduction. Finally, we consider the nature of 'difference' as experienced by people with epilepsy and how that difference translates into stigma; and provide evidence from a specific targeted intervention to combat epilepsy stigma that its reduction is an achievable goal.

Aggressive behaviour in intellectually challenged patients with epilepsy treated with lamotrigine

PURPOSE

Lamotrigine (LTG) is a valuable addition to the medical management of epilepsy with wide spectrum of efficacy and good outcomes for quality of life. We report the emergence of a syndrome of aggressive behavior provoked by LTG in patients with epilepsy and intellectual challenge.

METHODS

On recognition of a tendency to aggression in intellectually challenged patients whose epilepsy was treated with LTG, a survey was conducted of those from centers specializing in management of patients with intellectual disability who were treated with LTG. Responses to LTG were sought and patient's behavioral profiles were determined.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients were identified (16 men, 3 women, aged 17-54 years). Five patients discontinued LTG due to unprovoked aggressive behavior subsequent to its use; 2 had aggressive behavior sufficient to justify discontinuation of LTG but required reintroduction to control the epilepsy; 1 required reduction in LTG dosage; 1 had aggression that responded to psychiatric intervention; and 1 had aggression unrelated to LTG. Four patients had behavioral problems other than aggression, 4 had no change in behavior, and the behavior of 1 was improved by LTG treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

LTG may provoke aggressive behavior and violence in intellectually handicapped patients with epilepsy, which may limit its use in such patients. Acknowledgment of the potential for such disturbance justifies greater surveillance of these patients and early discontinuation of LTG if necessary.

Review of the legal obligations of the doctor to discuss Sudden Unexplained Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP)--a cohort controlled comparative cross-matched study in an outpatient epilepsy clinic

INTRODUCTION

Acknowledging informed consent and warning of material risk, the present study examined the current debate regarding early discussion of Sudden Unexplained Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP). It sought to confirm the profile of those prone to SUDEP and to determine the basis for disclosure to patients.

METHODS

Patients with SUDEP attending an Australian outpatient epilepsy clinic between 1985 and 2000 were compared to an age, gender and epilepsy type cross-matched control group to ascertain risk factors for SUDEP and similarities to published parameters. These were evaluated as the basis for actions in negligence for either disclosure or failure to disclose.

RESULTS

Twenty-one SUDEP patients were identified: aged 18-70 years; the majority had localisation-related epilepsy (13:8, 62%); male to female ratio was 3:1; and 15/21 used polypharmacy, compared with 8/21 controls (P = 0.02951). Handedness, alcohol use or deterioration of epilepsy were unrelated.

DISCUSSION

This population mirrored the literature and confirmed an absence of risk factors amenable to modification. As discussion of SUDEP with males with localisation-related epilepsy on polypharmacy could not alter outcome it is unlikely that failure to disclose could be causal and hence successful in an action for negligence. Conversely, disclosure, in the absence of the patient seeking the information, may causally adversely affect quality of life hence providing successful action in negligence. Duty of care dictates open and frank discussion with those seeking the information. Thus, each case must be managed individually and doctors are advised to document the decision-making process.

Melatonin response in active epilepsy

Urinary excretion of 6-sulfatoxymelatonin (aMT.6S), the hepatic metabolite of melatonin, was measured for three consecutive 8-h intervals, beginning at 0600 h, in 30 patients with untreated active epilepsy and in 19 healthy subjects. Excretion of aMT.6S in a 24-h period in patients with active epilepsy was 77.3 +/- 55 nmol (median 68.0, range 8.7-280 nmol), significantly higher (p < 0.05) than that of healthy subjects (49.1 +/- 14 nmol, median 49.0, range 19.7-68.0 nmol). Sequential 8-h urinary aMT.6S excretion rates in patients with active epilepsy were 2.45 +/- 2.8 nmol/h (0600-1400 h), 0.83 +/- 0.5 nmol (1400-2200 h) and 6.38 +/- 5.0 nmol/h (2200-0600 h) as compared with 1.43 +/- 0.8, 1.10 +/- 0.8 and 3.81 +/- 1.3 nmol/h, respectively, in healthy subjects. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) indicated that the difference in total output resulted from greater nocturnal excretion (F = 5.58, p = 0.018). Melatonin production in untreated patients with active epilepsy is increased and has a circadian pattern with a phase difference as compared with that of normal subjects.

The absorption of gabapentin following high dose escalation

Gabapentins (GBP) is structurally similar to GABA yet its mode of action remains uncertain. It is water-soluble and GI tract absorption occurs via the L-amino acid transport system in the proximal small bowel. It has been suggested that this transportation is capacity limited, thus decreasing GBP bioavailability at higher doses. GBP is not protein bound, therefore, salivary levels might be expected to be similar to those in serum; also the drug does not induce hepatic enzymes and is excreted unmetabolised by the kidney. Within the dose-range normally prescribed, it is devoid of pharmacokinetic (PK) drug interactions with all other anti-epileptic drugs. This study assesses two things in patients with epilepsy: (a) bioavailability of higher doses of GBP (1200-4800 mg per day), and (b) the influence of high dose GBP on between-dose serum concentrations of co-prescribed anti-epileptic drugs. After stabilising at each dosage, a sequence of serum and saliva samples were collected within the dosage interval; GBP and co-medication concentrations were determined and the results subjected to PK modelling. Meaned results from 10 patients indicate that GBP continues to be absorbed in a reasonably linear manner relative to dose up to 4800 mg per day. The study also shows that GBP is transported into saliva, however, salivary concentrations are only 5-10% of those in plasma. Furthermore, the results indicate that GBP, in higher than recommended doses, did not change plasma concentrations of lamotrigine, carbamazepine, carbamazepine-epoxide, vigabatrin, primidone, phenobarbitone or phenytoin when added to treatment. It is concluded that larger than recommended doses of GBP can be efficiently absorbed by some patients and also that GBP plasma levels do not fluctuate greatly between dosage intervals, therefore, twice daily dosage is a possibility.

Interface of epilepsy and sleep disorders

Obstructive sleep apnoea was first brought to prominence by Henri Gastaut, a French epileptologist. Since that time the interface between epilepsy and sleep disorders has received less attention than might be justified, recognizing that sleep deprivation is a poignant provocateur for seizures. Sleep deprivation is often used as a diagnostic procedure during electroencephalography (EEG) when waking EEG has failed to demonstrate abnormality. Patients referred to an outpatient neurological clinic for evaluation of possible seizures in whom sleep disorder was suspected, either due to snoring during the EEG or based on history, were evaluated with all-night diagnostic polysomnography (PSG) and appropriate intervention administered as indicated. Patient and seizure demography, sleep disorder and response to therapy were reviewed and the interface explored. Fifty patients aged between 10 and 83 years underwent PSG. Approximately half were diagnosed with epilepsy and almost three-quarters had sleep disorders sufficiently intrusive to require therapy (either continuous positive air pressure (CPAP) or medication). With co-existence of epilepsy and sleep disorders, proper management of sleep disorders provided significant benefit for seizure control. Snoring during EEG recordings could alert to the possibility of a sleep disorder even with epilepsy diagnosed. Where both epilepsy and sleep disorder coexist appropriate management of the sleep disorder improves control of the epilepsy.

Cross-reactive skin eruption with both carbamazepine and oxcarbazepine

Oxcarbazepine (OCBZ), a 10-keto derivative of carbamazepine (CBZ) has been reported to have a similar range of efficacy and fewer unwanted effects than CBZ since it is a prodrug for the monohydroxy derivative (MHD). A cross-reactivity of only 1 in 4 has been reported between OCBZ and CBZ. For these reasons, we tried OCBZ with 3 consecutive patients with poorly controlled epilepsy who had had a therapeutic response to CBZ but in whom CBZ was discontinued because of serious skin reaction. Each patient had a similar skin response after exposure to only 600-900 mg OCBZ, which suggests a need to practice caution when substituting OCBZ for CBZ in patients known to have serious skin reaction to CBZ.

Measurement of levetiracetam drug levels to assist with seizure control and monitoring of drug interactions with other anti-epileptic medications (AEMs)

PURPOSE

Levetiracetam (LEV) therapeutic range (20-40mg/L) and potential drug interactions were assessed in people with epilepsy (PWE).

METHOD

Fifty-two PWE had LEV and concomitant medications [carbamazepine (CBZ); valproate (VPA); lamotrigine (LTG)] blood levels measured and compared to seizure activity. Lacosamide (LCM) levels were unavailable. Adopted therapeutic ranges were: 20-40mg/L - LEV; 25-50μmol/L - total CBZ; 6-13μmol/L - free CBZ; 300-750μmol/L - total VPA; 30-75μmol/L - free VPA; and 40-60μmol/L - LTG. Seizure-freedom was assessed and patients followed for almost two years.

RESULTS

23 of 52 PWE (44%) used LEV monotherapy and 16/23 (70%) had 'therapeutic' LEV with 13/16 (81%) seizure-free. 29 of 52 (56%) used polytherapy and 16/29 (55%) had 'therapeutic' LEV with 7/16 (44%) seizure-free. 11 of 29 (38%) used CBZ: 4/11 (36%) had therapeutic mean LEV levels and 7/11 (64%) were seizure-free. Fourteen (48%) used VPA: 9/14 (64%) had therapeutic mean LEV levels and 8/14 (57%) were seizure-free. 13 of 29 (45%) used LTG: 8/13 (62%) had therapeutic mean LEV levels and 5/13 (38%) were seizure-free. LEV did not alter CBZ, but CBZ affected LEV. LEV elevated VPA free levels but not VPA total levels. Dosage/concentration was lowered with polytherapy.

CONCLUSION

LEV range (20-40mg/L) assisted epilepsy management and anti-epileptic medication interactions were suggested with polytherapy thus possibly explaining the impaired efficacy of LEV with polytherapy.

Vertebral artery dissection in hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: a case series and literature review

BACKGROUND

Arterial dissection is a rare complication of pregnancy and puerperium. There have been reports of aortic, coronary and cervical artery dissection in association with preeclampsia, however, vertebral artery dissection is rarely reported particularly in the antenatal setting in the presence of a Hypertensive Disorder of Pregnancy (HDP).The general annual incidence of symptomatic spontaneous cervicocephalic arterial dissection is 0.0026 % and a data registry reported that 2.4 % of these occurred in the post-partum period. The actual incidence of vertebral artery dissection in HDP is unknown as the current literature consists of case series and reports only with most documenting adverse outcomes. Given the presence of collateral circulation, unilateral vertebral artery dissections may go unrecognised and may be more common than suspected.

CASE PRESENTATION

We present a case series of four patients with vertebral artery dissection in association with HDP, two of which occurred in the antenatal setting and two in the post-partum setting. All our patients had favourable outcome with no maternal neurological deficit and live infants. Our discussion covers the proposed pathophysiology of vertebral artery dissection in HDP and the management of it.

CONCLUSION

Our case series highlights the need to consider VAD an important differential diagnosis when assessing pregnant women with headache and neck pain particularly in the context of HDP.

Prevalence of positive syphilis serology and meningovascular neurosyphilis in patients admitted with stroke and TIA from a culturally diverse population (2005-09)

The study aims were to determine the prevalence of positive syphilis serology and meningovascular neurosyphilis (NS) in patients admitted with transient ischaemic attack (TIA) and stroke to a tertiary hospital serving a culturally diverse community. A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted using routinely collected administrative data and medical records to identify patients admitted with TIA, stroke and other conditions, with positive syphilis serology, between 2005 and 2009. Direct medical record review confirmed diagnoses of meningovascular NS. Syphilis serology was requested in 27% (893/3270) of all patients with TIA and stroke (2005-09) of whom 4% (38/893) were positive. Thirty-seven patients with positive serology had clinical characteristics consistent with meningovascular NS. Their mean age was 72±13 years; 65% were male and 68% had a recorded place of birth in South-East Asia or the Pacific Islands. One of 12 patients with suspected meningovascular NS with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis had a positive CSF Venereal Disease Research Laboratory (VDRL) test. Three patients (8%) met diagnostic criteria for "definite or probable" meningovascular NS. All three patients with a "definite or probable" meningovascular NS and 15 (44%) of the remainder who had positive serology without confirmation of NS were treated with intravenous or intramuscular penicillin. Lumbar puncture (LP) and penicillin were underutilised in patients with TIA and stroke with positive serology. In conclusion, syphilis testing should be considered part of the diagnostic work-up of TIA and stroke, particularly in ethnically diverse populations. In patients with TIA and stroke with positive syphilis serology, it would seem appropriate to further pursue diagnosis and treatment and in patients unable to undergo LP, empiric treatment for NS should be considered.

Levetiracetam in chronic daily headache: a double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled study. (The Australian KEPPRA Headache Trial [AUS-KHT])

INTRODUCTION

Chronic daily headache (CDH) represents a temporal profile of headache (15+ days/month; 4+ hours/day; >6 months). We report the first comprehensive and largest levetiracetam (LEV) trial in CDH.

METHODS

A 27-week, multi-centre, randomised, placebo-controlled, cross-over, phase III B study assessed efficacy of a target of 3 g/day LEV of 6 placebo tablets/day in CDH. Primary efficacy was headache-free rate (HFR) while secondary parameters were loss of diagnostic criteria; severity; duration; disability; associated features; pain; and quality of life.

RESULTS

Ninety-six patients were recruited (baseline HFR 10.4 ± 14.6%; median 0%). At onset of history 73 (74.1%) had migraine +/- aura and 35 (36.5%) had tension-type headache (TTH). Over the six months preceding recruitment 54 (56.3%) had migraine and 42 (43.8%) had TTH. Headache history was 22.6 ± 15.0 years (median 20.0). Eighty-eight received placebo and 89 received LEV with >80 receiving stable dose in either arm. LEV achieved 3.9% increased HFR over placebo, showing a trend but not significance. There was 9.9% increase in loss of CDH diagnostic criteria re: headache days/month for LEV over placebo (p = .0325), reduced disability (p = .0487) and reduced pain severity for LEV (p = .0162). The Short-Form Quality of Life assessment instrument (SF-36) showed impaired mental health on LEV (p = .001).

DISCUSSION

These findings conflict with reports of LEV efficacy, mandating placebo control in headache trials. Primary efficacy equated to one extra headache-free day/month with reduced disability and pain intensity. Mental health was reduced on LEV. The 10% loss of diagnostic criteria, decreased intensity and disability suggest a subpopulation with CDH where LEV remains a therapeutic option.

Efficacy and safety of levetiracetam 1000-3000 mg/day in patients with refractory partial-onset seizures: a multicenter, open-label single-arm study

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of levetiracetam as add-on therapy in patients with refractory partial-onset seizures in a protocol designed to reflect clinical practice.

METHODS

All patients in this open-label, single-arm study entered an 8-week baseline period followed by a 4-week titration period and a 12-week maintenance period. Patients initially received levetiracetam 1000 mg/day (administered bid) and could increase to 2000 mg/day after 2 weeks, and to 3000 mg/day after another 2 weeks, to obtain adequate seizure control. During the 12-week maintenance period, the dose of levetiracetam could not be increased but could be decreased once if tolerability warranted. Seizure count and adverse events were recorded by patients in a diary. Quality of life and global evaluation of disease evolution were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Ninety-nine patients were enrolled and 91 completed the study. A steady dose was maintained over the last 8 weeks of treatment or longer in 84 patients, with 89.3% of these patients receiving 3000 mg/day, 9.5% receiving 2000 mg/day, and 1.2% receiving 1000 mg/day. A 35.9% median percent reduction from baseline in weekly frequency of partial-onset seizures was observed over the entire treatment period. The median partial-onset seizure count decreased from 2.3 per week during the baseline period to 1.3 per week over the treatment period. A total of 42.4% of patients were responders (> or = 50% reduction from baseline in weekly seizure frequency) over the treatment period; two patients were seizure-free from the first day of treatment throughout the treatment period. The most frequent drug-related adverse events were fatigue (27.3% of patients), somnolence (11.1%), headache (8.1%), and dizziness (8.1%).

CONCLUSION

Levetiracetam as add-on therapy at doses up to 3000 mg/day effectively reduced the frequency of partial-onset seizures in patients with refractory epilepsy and was well-tolerated in this study, bridging conditions of placebo-controlled clinical trials and clinical practice.

Validation of emergency and final diagnosis coding in transient ischemic attack: South Western Sydney transient ischemic attack study

BACKGROUND

It is important to establish the validity of diagnostic coding in administrative datasets used in stroke and transient ischemic attack (TIA) research. This study examines the accuracy of emergency department (ED) TIA diagnosis and final diagnostic coding after hospital admission.

METHODS

Using administrative datasets, we identified all patients with an ED TIA diagnosis (435.9; ICD-9) admitted to Liverpool Hospital from January 2003 to December 2007. ED and hospital admission records were matched and final diagnosis codes (ICD-10-AM) recorded. All records were expertly reviewed to determine coding validity.

RESULTS

570 patients were admitted with an ED TIA diagnosis. According to ICD-10-AM coding, 46% had TIA, 29% stroke and 25% TIA mimic diagnoses. Expert review determined final diagnoses of TIA in 51.4%, stroke in 26.1% and TIA mimic in 22.5% of the patients. The positive predictive value of a final TIA diagnosis (ICD-10-AM) was 88.2% when subjected to expert review. TIA mimic disorders diagnosed after admission included serious conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

Half of the emergency diagnoses retained a TIA diagnosis after hospital admission. In the setting of neurological admission there were small percentage differences between coded final diagnosis for TIA, stroke and mimic and diagnoses at expert review. Admission of ED TIA cases permitted identification of TIA mimics with serious conditions requiring non-TIA management.

Validating a screening questionnaire for parkinsonism in Australia

Parkinson's disease is a common neurodegenerative disorder in elderly people. Epidemiological studies of the disease can be labour intensive. A two phase design including a screening questionnaire as the first phase has become a popular method in prevalence studies of Parkinson's disease. Such a design has many advantages including less work for assessing physicians and enhanced recruitment of people to be screened. However, its wider application may be questioned because validation has been limited to samples that are drawn from hospitals (or clinics) and may be inappropriate for a community setting. This study assesses whether validating screening questionnaire by using a hospital sample yields the same result as a community based sample. Furthermore, it seeks to establish whether the screening instrument can be simplified to involve less questions. The findings show that some of the questions used in the screening phase yield different responses when comparing a hospital group with a community group. This study also provides a simplified model of questions that may be relevant for screening in the community setting.

Outcomes of patients with transient ischaemic attack after hospital admission or discharge from the emergency department

OBJECTIVE

To compare outcomes at 28 days and 1 year between patients admitted to hospital and those discharged after presenting to the emergency department (ED) with transient ischaemic attack (TIA).

DESIGN AND SETTING

All TIA presentations to EDs in a large metropolitan and rural region of Sydney and its surroundings, New South Wales, between 2001 and 2005 were extracted from state health department databases and followed up over 1 year. Admission and discharge data and subsequent TIA or stroke presentations were identified.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

TIA recurrence or stroke.

RESULTS

Of 2535 presentations to an ED with TIA during the 5-year period, 1816 patients were admitted to hospital (71.6%) and 719 were discharged from the ED (28.4%). At 28 days, the discharged group had significantly higher rates of recurrence than the admitted group for all events (TIA or stroke) (5.3% v 2.3%, P < 0.001), stroke (2.1% v 0.7%, P = 0.002), and recurrent TIA (3.2% v 1.6%, P = 0.01). During the 29-365-day follow-up period, there was no significant difference between the discharged and admitted groups for all events (4.2% v 5.1%; P = 0.37), stroke (1.3% v 2.5%; P = 0.06) or recurrent TIA (2.9% v 2.6%; P = 0.65).

CONCLUSION

Patients with an ED diagnosis of TIA may benefit from admission to hospital through a reduced risk of early stroke.

The benefits of antiepileptic drug (AED) blood level monitoring to complement clinical management of people with epilepsy

INTRODUCTION

Some argue that there is no evidence to support the use of antiepileptic drug (AED) blood level monitoring when treating people with epilepsy (PWE). This paper identifies how AED monitoring can be invaluable in such treatment. SPECIFIC EXAMPLES: (i) Compliance: Antiepileptic drug blood levels often confirm noncompliance rather than adequate seizure control, confirming subtherapeutic levels in PWE attending hospitals due to seizures. Routine monitoring of AED levels may prevent breakthrough seizures by identifying noncompliance and instituting heightened compliance measures before experiencing breakthrough seizures without modifying dosages. For PWE attending hospitals due to seizures, loading with the AED shown to be subtherapeutic may be all that is required. (ii) Cluster seizures and status epilepticus: When using long-acting AEDs to complement benzodiazepines, blood level monitoring confirms that an adequate dosage was given and, if not, a further bolus can be administered with further monitoring. This is particularly useful when using rectal administration of AEDs. (iii) Polypharmacy: Polypharmacy provokes drug interactions in which case AED monitoring helps in differentiating adequate dosing, offending AED with toxicity and free level measuring benefits when total levels are unhelpful. (iv) Generic substitution: Generic AEDs can fluctuate considerably from a parent compound, and even a parent compound, sourced from an alternative supplier, may have altered bioavailability for which blood level monitoring is very useful.

CONCLUSIONS

While therapeutic blood level monitoring is not a substitute for good clinical judgment, it offers a valuable adjunct to patient care.

Psychosocial sequelae of epilepsy: the role of associated cerebral pathology

The psychosocial problems of a group of subjects with idiopathic epilepsy and another with posttraumatic epilepsy were assessed using the Washington Psychosocial Seizure Inventory (WPSI). A comparison between the two aetiological groups suggests that the associated cerebral pathology is the salient epilepsy-related factor in the emergence of psychosocial disability in a proportion of people with epilepsy. It is suggested that cerebral pathology may account for variations in previous psychosocial comparisons and future research should minimise possible confounding by attempting to control this factor.

Nontraumatic spinal cord ischaemic syndrome

This study presents the clinical features and functional outcomes of eight consecutive patients who were admitted to our institution between 2012 and 2014 with nontraumatic spinal cord infarction (SCI), a rare and devastating condition. We also present a literature review of aetiologies and prognostic factors relevant to our case series. The mean age of our cohort was 64 years and five patients were female. Aortic disease was causative in three, including one patient with biopsy confirmed giant cell arteritis. Fibrocartilaginous embolism was a possible aetiology in two others, anterior spinal artery aneurysm in one, and the cause was undetermined in two patients. American Spinal Injury Association impairment scale (ASIA) scores at nadir (time of maximum severity of signs) were B in three, C in three and D in two patients (all were wheelchair dependent). At last follow-up, ASIA scores were C in one, D in five and E in one patient. One patient died, two remained wheelchair dependent, four required a walking aid or frame and one was mobilising independently. A literature review of 11 patient series of nontraumatic SCI found that prognosis is primarily determined by the severity of motor or sensory involvement, in particular, initial and nadir ASIA A/B scores which strongly correlate with poor outcome. In the majority of series, 40-60% of patients had initial ASIA A/B scores with a similar proportion remaining wheelchair dependent on follow-up. Most patients in our cohort had nadir ASIA C/D scores, which may explain their better outcomes.

False-negative response rate in epidemiologic studies to define prevalence ratios of epilepsy

This study has adopted a tested questionnaire, used in a population prevalence study, and distributed it to a sample of people identified as having epilepsy to determine the false-negative response rate for this type of epidemiologic study.