Delayed graft function: current status and future directions

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Delayed graft function is a common early posttransplant event predictive of adverse outcomes including hospital readmission, impaired long-term graft function, and decreased graft and patient survival. The purpose of this review is to summarize recent literature describing delayed graft function in hopes of better understanding and managing this condition.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent research efforts have been garnered towards risk factor modification, prevention, and earlier detection of delayed graft function. In this review, we aim to summarize current innovative approaches and future directions.

SUMMARY

Delayed graft function portends worse graft and patient outcomes. Continued research to prevent, and detect early perturbations in allograft function, and more optimally manage this disease will hopefully improve graft function, along with graft/patient survival.

Kidney disease in non-kidney solid organ transplantation

Kidney disease after non-kidney solid organ transplantation (NKSOT) is a common post-transplant complication associated with deleterious outcomes. Kidney disease, both acute kidney injury and chronic kidney disease (CKD) alike, emanates from multifactorial, summative pre-, peri- and post-transplant events. Several factors leading to kidney disease are shared amongst solid organ transplantation in addition to distinct mechanisms unique to individual transplant types. The aim of this review is to summarize the current literature describing kidney disease in NKSOT. We conducted a narrative review of pertinent studies on the subject, limiting our search to full text studies in the English language. Kidney disease after NKSOT is prevalent, particularly in intestinal and lung transplantation. Management strategies in the peri-operative and post-transplant periods including proteinuria management, calcineurin-inhibitor minimization/ sparing approaches, and nephrology referral can counteract CKD progression and/or aid in subsequent kidney after solid organ transplantation. Kidney disease after NKSOT is an important consideration in organ allocation practices, ethics of transplantation. Kidney disease after SOT is an incipient condition demanding further inquiry. While some truths have been revealed about this chronic disease, as we have aimed to describe in this review, continued multidisciplinary efforts are needed more than ever to combat this threat to patient and allograft survival.

Significance of Asymptomatic Pyelonephritis Found on Kidney Transplant Biopsy

The clinical significance and appropriate management of graft pyelonephritis diagnosed by biopsy are poorly understood.

Methods

We analyzed data from all patients with pyelonephritis on transplant kidney biopsy from January 1998 to December 2019. Patients were divided into 2 groups: those whose urinalysis was positive for urinary tract infection (UA+) and those whose urinalysis was negative (UA-).

Results

There were a total of 101 patients with the diagnosis of pyelonephritis by biopsy during the study period. The mean time from transplant to pyelonephritis diagnosis was 3.3 ± 4 y. Thirty-six (35.6%) of the patients with pyelonephritis on biopsy had a negative UA. Out of 65 patients in the UA+ group, 54 (83%) received antibiotics. Only 12 of the UA- patients (33%) received antibiotics. The use of antibiotics in both the UA+ (P = 0.03) and UA- groups (P = 0.02) compared with no use of antibiotics was associated with better death-censored graft survival. On multivariate analysis, the use of antibiotics (hazard ratio = 0.22, P = 0.001, 95% confidence interval, 0.12-0.61) was associated with improved graft survival.

Conclusion

The finding of pyelonephritis on a transplant kidney biopsy is almost always a surprise but is an important finding. Treatment with antibiotics, regardless of signs or symptoms of urinary tract infection, is associated with improved graft survival.

Cytomegalovirus nephritis in kidney transplant recipients: Epidemiology and outcomes of an uncommon diagnosis

BACKGROUND

Data on epidemiology and outcomes of cytomegalovirus (CMV) nephritis in kidney transplant patients are limited due to the rarity of this condition.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all kidney transplant recipients (KTR) (n = 6490) and biopsy-proven CMV nephritis between 1/1997 and 12/2020 was performed.

RESULTS

The prevalence of CMV nephritis was low: 13/6490 (0.2%). The diagnosis was made at a median of 7.0 months (range 2.6-15.6 months) after transplant. 6 of 13 (46%) patients were CMV (D+/R-). Median CMV DNA load at biopsy was 376,000, IU/mL (range 87,000-6,460,000 IU/mL). Main biopsy features were CMV glomerulitis (n = 7/13, 54%) followed by CMV tubulointerstitial nephritis (6/13; 46%). Mean eGFR at biopsy (22.7 ± 12 mL/min/1.73 m² ) was significantly decreased compared to baseline eGFR (38.7 ± 18.5 mL/min/1.73 m² , p = 0.02). The vast majority, 11 of 13 (85%), experienced graft failure including 5 of 13 (38%) death-censored. 5 of 13 (38%) patients were diagnosed with acute rejection: three had concurrent acute rejection, and two had rejection within 3 months of index biopsy, respectively. Patients with tubulointerstitial CMV nephritis were significantly more likely to have rejection at the time of biopsy (50% vs. 0%, p < 0.05) compared to those with glomerular CMV nephritis. There were no significant differences between these groups in terms of eGFR at all time points, death, graft failure, immunosuppression changes or rejection after biopsy.

CONCLUSION

CMV nephritis is rare but appears to be associated with poor patient/allograft outcomes. Early identification and timely treatment of CMV infection may prevent end-organ involvement and improve patient and allograft-related outcomes.

Transplant kidney biopsy for proteinuria with stable creatinine: Findings and outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Little is known aboutbiopsy findings and outcomes when kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) undergo biopsy for isolated proteinuria with stable serum creatinine (SCr).

METHODS

We analyzed all KTRs who underwent biopsy for isolated proteinuria with stable SCr between January 2016 and June 2020. Patients were divided into three groups based on the biopsy findings: Active Rejection (AR), Glomerulonephritis (GN), and Other.

RESULTS

A total of 130 KTRs fulfilled our selection criteria; 38 (29%) in the AR group, 26 (20%) in the GN group, and 66 (51%) in the Other group. Most baseline characteristics were similar between the groups. In multivariate analysis, higher HLA mismatch (HR per mismatch: 1.30; 95% CI:1.06-1.59; P = .01) and male gender (HR: .45; 95% CI .23-.89; P = .02) were associated with AR. There was no significant correlation between the degree of proteinuria and rejection (r = .05, P = .58) or GN (r = .07, P = .53). Graft survival was also similar between the groups. Likely due to the early diagnosis without a significant rise in SCr, outcomes were similar among all three groups.

CONCLUSION

Routine monitoring for proteinuria followed by a biopsy and appropriate management may help to identify early acute graft injury and prevent graft failure.

Post-transplant erythrocytosis after kidney transplantation: A review

Post-transplant erythrocytosis (PTE) is defined as persistently elevated hemoglobin > 17 g/dL or hematocrit levels > 51% following kidney transplantation, independent of duration. It is a relatively common complication within 8 months to 24 months post-transplantation, occurring in 8%-15% of kidney transplant recipients. Established PTE risk factors include male gender, normal hemoglobin/hematocrit pre-transplant (suggestive of robust native kidney erythropoietin production), renal artery stenosis, patients with a well-functioning graft, and dialysis before transplantation. Many factors play a role in the development of PTE, however, underlying endogenous erythropoietin secretion pre-and post-transplant is significant. Other contributory factors include the renin-angiotensin- aldosterone system, insulin-like growth factors, endogenous androgens, and local renal hypoxia. Most patients with PTE experience mild symptoms like malaise, headache, fatigue, and dizziness. While prior investigations showed an increased risk of thromboembolic events, more recent evidence tells a different story-that PTE perhaps has lessened risk of thromboembolic events or negative graft outcomes than previously thought. In the evaluation of PTE, it is important to exclude other causes of erythrocytosis including malignancy before treatment. Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-I) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) are the mainstays of treatment. Increased ACE-I/ARB use has likely contributed to the falling incidence of erythrocytosis. In this review article, we summarize the current literature in the field of post-transplant erythrocytosis after kidney transplantation.

Risk factors for progression from low level BK dnaemia to unfavorable outcomes after BK management via immunosuppressive reduction

BACKGROUNDS

Effective management of BK viremia (BKPyV-DNAemia) in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) involves regular monitoring and adjustment of immunosuppression. With this strategy, the majority of patients will clear BK or have ongoing, but non-significant, low-level BKPyV-DNAemia. However, despite adjustments, some will develop more severe sequelae of BK including BKPyV-DNAemia >5 log₁₀ copies/mL and BK nephropathy, and others may develop de novo DSA (dnDSA) or acute rejection (AR).

METHODS

This was a single-center study of KTRs transplanted at the University of Wisconsin-Madison between 01/01/2015 and 12/31/2017. In this study, we sought to elucidate characteristics associated with the progression of BKPyV-DNAemia to unfavorable outcomes after decreasing immunosuppressive medications for the management of BK viremia as described in consensus guidelines.

RESULTS

A total of 224 KTRs fulfilled our selection criteria; 118 (53%) resolved or had persistent low DNAemia, 64 (28%) had severe BK/nephropathy, and 42 (19%) developed dnDSA or AR. In multivariable analysis, female gender (HR: 2.05; 95% CI: 1.08-3.90; P = .02); previous rejection (HR: 2.90; 95% CI: 1.04-8.12; P = .04), and early infection (HR: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.72-0.90; P < .001) were associated with the development of severe BK/nephropathy. Conversely, non-depleting induction at transplant (HR: 2.06; 95% CI: 1.03-4.11; P = .03), HLA mismatches >3 (HR: 2.27; HR: 1.01-5.06; P = .04), and delayed graft function (HR: 4.14; 95% CI: 1.12-15.28; P = .03) were associated with development of dnDSA and/or rejection.

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that almost half of KTRs with BKPyV-DNAemia managed by our immunosuppressant adjustment protocol progress unfavorably. Identification of these risk factors could assist the frontline clinician in creating an individualized immunosuppressive modification plan potentially mitigating negative outcomes.

Treatment of Chronic Active Antibody-mediated Rejection With Pulse Steroids, IVIG, With or Without Rituximab is Associated With Increased Risk of Pneumonia

Background.

The risk of infection associated with specific treatments of chronic active antibody-mediated rejection (cAMR) after kidney transplantation remains unknown.

Methods.

This was a single-center study of kidney transplant recipients treated with pulse steroids, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) ± rituximab for biopsy-confirmed cAMR. The control group consisted of age- and race-matched patients who underwent donor-specific antibody-based protocol biopsies but had no rejection. We collected data on BK virus (BKV), cytomegalovirus (CMV), urinary tract infection (UTI), and pneumonia postbiopsy.

Results.

There were 49 patients in each group. In those with cAMR, 21 (43%) were treated with steroids, IVIG, and rituximab; the remaining received steroids and IVIG only. The risk of graft failure was greater in the cAMR group [22 (45%) vs. 3 (6%), P < 0.001]. Kaplan-Meier analyses demonstrated a significantly greater risk of pneumonia in the cAMR group (P = 0.02). This was confirmed by multivariable Cox regression analyses [Hazard ratio (HR) = 6.04, P = 0.027, 95% CI, 1.22-29.75]. None of the patients with pneumonia were affected by opportunistic pathogens. Additionally, the risk of CMV, UTI, and BKV was not increased. Rituximab was not independently associated with any of the infections studied.

Conclusions.

Treatment of cAMR, but not rituximab, was associated with a 6-fold increased risk of pneumonia. Additional studies are needed to determine the safety and efficacy of prolonged antimicrobial prophylaxis and monitoring strategies, including for hypogammaglobulinemia, to reduce the risk of pneumonia following the treatment of cAMR.

Role of novel biomarkers in kidney transplantation

Clinical application of biomarkers is an integral component of transplant care. Clinicians and scientists alike are in search of better biomarkers than the current serologic (serum creatinine, donor-specific antibodies), urine-derived (urinalysis, urine protein), and histologic ones we now use. The science behind recent biomarker discovery spans across multiple molecular biologic disciplines, including transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics. Innovative methodology and integration of basic and clinical approaches have allowed researchers to unearth molecular phenomena preceding clinical disease. Biomarkers can be classified in several ways. In this review, we have classified them via their origin and outcome: Primarily immunologic, i.e., representative of immune regulation and dysfunction and non-immunologic, pertaining to delayed graft function, cardiovascular events/mortality, infection, malignancy, post-transplant diabetes, graft, and patient survival. Novel biomarker uses to guide the diagnosis and management of transplant-related outcomes is a promising area of research. However, the use of biomarkers to predict outcomes after kidney transplantation is not well studied. In this review, we summarize the recent studies illustrating biomarker use and transplant outcomes.

Incidence and Outcomes of Significant Weight Changes After Pancreas Transplant Alone

Background.

Weight change, primarily weight gain, is a common problem among solid organ transplant recipients. The incidence of weight gain or loss after successful pancreas transplant alone (PTA) and the effect on graft survival is unknown.

Methods.

This was a single-center observational study among PTA recipients, transplanted at our center between January 1, 2005, and July 31, 2017, who had a functional pancreas graft for at least 1 year and documented weight change at the 1-year clinic visit.

Results.

In this cohort study of 105 PTA recipients, 28 had significant weight gain, 27 had significant weight loss, and the remaining 50 did not have significant weight change at 1-year posttransplant. When comparing the weight gain and no weight change groups, the weight gain cohort started to gain weight at 3 months posttransplant to 5 years or last follow up. Similarly, the weight loss group lost weight at 3 months posttransplant up to last follow up. Clinically significant weight gain or weight loss were not associated with uncensored or death censored graft failure in univariate regression and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Also, there were no significant differences between the groups in the glycated hemoglobin at last follow up.

Conclusions.

Approximately 50% of PTA recipients had a significant weight change at 1-year posttransplant, of which 25% gained significant weight and 25% loss. There was no significant difference in graft survival due to the significant weight changes. Further research is needed in this field.

Pancreas Retransplant After Pancreas Graft Failure in Simultaneous Pancreas-kidney Transplants Is Associated With Better Kidney Graft Survival

Background.

Simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplant is usually the best option for the diabetic end-stage renal disease patient. There is limited information about kidney graft outcomes in SPK recipients with isolated pancreas graft failure who do versus do not undergo pancreas retransplantation.

Methods.

Patients were divided into 2 groups based on whether they underwent pancreas retransplant (ReTx⁺) or not (ReTx⁻). Kidney graft function and survival were the primary endpoints.

Results.

One hundred and nine patients satisfied our selection criteria, 25 in ReTx⁺ and 84 in ReTx⁻. Mean interval from SPK to pancreas failure was significantly shorter in the ReTx⁺ compared with the ReTx⁻ group, 19.3 ± 36.7 versus 45.7 ± 47.0 months (P = 0.01), respectively. There was no significant difference in kidney graft follow-up post SPK between 2 groups (P = 0.48). At last follow-up, 15 of the 25 (60%) of the repeat pancreas graft had failed, with a mean graft survival among these failed pancreas graft of 2.6 ± 2.7 years, ranging from 0 to 8.1 years. Uncensored kidney graft failure was significantly lower in the ReTx⁺ group compared with the ReTx⁻ group, 44% versus 67% (P = 0.04). Death-censored kidney graft failure was also lower in the ReTx⁺ group, 24% versus 48% (P = 0.04). The difference in patient survival did not reach statistical significance. In adjusted Cox regression analysis, rejection as a cause of pancreas failure was associated with increased risk of death-censored kidney graft failure, and pancreas retransplantation was associated with decreased risk of kidney graft failure. A similar pattern was seen after 1:1 matching for the interval between SPK and pancreas graft failure.

Conclusions.

Even though ReTx⁺ patients accept the risks associated with repeat pancreas surgery, providers should consider this option in suitable otherwise healthy patients.