Safety and performance of the third-generation drug-eluting resorbable coronary magnesium scaffold system in the treatment of subjects with de novo coronary artery lesions: 6-month results of the prospective, multicenter BIOMAG-I first-in-human study

Background

A third-generation coronary drug-eluting resorbable magnesium scaffold (DREAMS 3G) was developed to enhance the performance of previous scaffold generations and achieve angiographic outcomes comparable to those of contemporary drug-eluting stents.

Methods

This prospective, multicenter, non-randomized, first-in-human study was conducted at 14 centers in Europe. Eligible patients had stable or unstable angina, documented silent ischemia, or non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction, and a maximum of two single de novo lesions in two separate coronary arteries with a reference vessel diameter between 2.5 mm and 4.2 mm. Clinical follow-up was scheduled at one, six and 12 months and annually thereafter until five years. Invasive imaging assessments were scheduled six and 12 months postoperatively. The primary endpoint was angiographic in-scaffold late lumen loss at six months. This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04157153).

Findings

Between April 2020 and February 2022, 116 patients with 117 coronary artery lesions were enrolled. At six months, in-scaffold late lumen loss was 0.21 mm (SD 0.31). Intravascular ultrasound assessment showed preservation of the scaffold area (mean 7.59 mm² [SD 2.21] post-procedure vs 6.96 mm² [SD 2.48]) at six months) with a low mean neointimal area (0.02 mm² [SD 0.10]). Optical coherence tomography revealed that struts were embedded in the vessel wall and were already hardly discernible at six months. Target lesion failure occurred in one (0.9%) patient; a clinically driven target lesion revascularization was performed on post-procedure day 166. No definite or probable scaffold thrombosis or myocardial infarction was observed.

Interpretation

These findings show that the implantation of DREAMS 3G in de novo coronary lesions is associated with favorable safety and performance outcomes, comparable to contemporary drug-eluting stents.

Funding

This study was funded by BIOTRONIK AG.

Percutaneous treatment of diseased saphenous vein grafts: current state-of-the-art and future directions

The percutaneous treatment of patients with obstructive atherosclerotic disease in diseased coronary saphenous vein bypass grafts still remains a challenge in interventional cardiology. We discuss the actual evidence-based knowledge for the percutaneous management of this lesion subset, focusing on the devices that are actually considered the gold standard for this treatment: bare-metal stents and distal protection devices. We also comment the negative results of the trials regarding the promising covered stent-grafts. We finally offer insights into the currently available evidence for the use of drug-eluting stents in saphenous vein grafts. These devices are potentially a promise for the successful sealing of vein graft disease, however, available long-term safety and effectiveness data are conflicting and give reason for caution.

Randomized Double-Blind Comparison of Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Bare-Metal Stent Implantation in Diseased Saphenous Vein Grafts

OBJECTIVES

We sought to compare, in a randomized fashion, sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) versus bare-metal stents (BMS) in saphenous vein grafts (SVGs).

BACKGROUND

Sirolimus-eluting stents reduce restenosis and repeated revascularization in native coronary arteries compared with BMS. However, randomized data in SVG are absent.

METHODS

Patients with SVG lesions were randomized to SES or BMS. All were scheduled to undergo 6-month coronary angiography. The primary end point was 6-month angiographic in-stent late lumen loss. Secondary end points included binary angiographic restenosis, neointimal volume by intravascular ultrasound and major adverse clinical events (death, myocardial infarction, target lesion, and vessel revascularization).

RESULTS

A total of 75 patients with 96 lesions localized in 80 diseased SVGs were included: 38 patients received 60 SES for 47 lesions, whereas 37 patients received 54 BMS for 49 lesions. In-stent late loss was significantly reduced in SES (0.38 +/- 0.51 mm vs. 0.79 +/- 0.66 mm in BMS, p = 0.001). Binary in-stent and in-segment restenosis were reduced, 11.3% versus 30.6% (relative risk [RR] 0.37; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.15 to 0.97, p = 0.024) and 13.6% versus 32.6% (RR 0.42; 95% CI 0.18 to 0.97, p = 0.031), respectively. Median neointimal volume was 1 mm(3) (interquartile range 0 to 13) in SES versus 24 (interquartile range 8 to 34) in BMS (p < 0.001). Target lesion and vessel revascularization rates were significantly reduced, 5.3% versus 21.6% (RR 0.24; 95% CI 0.05 to 1.0, p = 0.047) and 5.3% versus 27% (RR 0.19; 95% CI 0.05 to 0.83, p = 0.012), respectively. Death and myocardial infarction rates were not different.

CONCLUSIONS

Sirolimus-eluting stents significantly reduce late loss in SVG as opposed to BMS. This is associated with a reduction in restenosis rate and repeated target lesion and vessel revascularization procedures. (The RRISC Study; http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct/show; NCT00263263).

Should Degenerated Saphenous Vein Grafts Routinely Be Sealed with Drug-Eluting Stents?

The percutaneous treatment of patients with obstructive atherosclerotic disease in degenerated coronary saphenous vein bypass grafts still remains one of the great challenges in interventional cardiology. In this review, we discuss the actual evidence-based knowledge for the percutaneous management of this lesion subset, focusing in particular on the devices that are actually considered the "gold standard" for this treatment: bare metal stents and distal protection devices. We also comment on the negative results of the randomized trials regarding the promising polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stent-grafts. We finally offer insights into the currently available evidence for the use of drug-eluting stents in saphenous vein grafts. These devices are potentially the principal promise for the long-term successful sealing of vein graft disease; however, clear and definitive data coming from controlled trials are requested.