Brain natriuretic peptide as a cardiac marker of transient radiotherapy-related damage in left-sided breast cancer patients: A prospective study

PURPOSE

Our study evaluated brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) changes over time after adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) in women with left-sided breast cancer investigating its correlation with heart dosimetric parameters.

METHODS

Forty-three patients underwent clinical cardiac examination, electrocardiogram (ECG), echocardiography and BNP measurement before RT (T0) and 1 (T1), 6 (T6) and 12 months (T12) after. After T12 cardiac assessment was performed annually in each patient. Mean values and standard deviation (SD) of BNP, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), V20, V25, V30, V45 and mean dose were calculated. Normalized BNP (BNPn) was calculated as follows: BNPnT1 = BNPT1/BNPT0, BNPnT6 = BNPT6/BNPT0, BNPnT12 = BNPT12/BNPT0. Absolute BNP and BNPn values were used for data analysis.

RESULTS

Median follow-up from the end of RT to the last check-up was 87 months (range 37-120 months). Minimum follow-up was 74 months except for two patients, who died at respectively 37 and 47 months after RT. In all patients LVEF did not change significantly (p = 0.22) after RT. BNP increased significantly (p < 0.001), particularly 1 and 6 months after RT. It slightly decreased after 12 months. BNP did not correlate with V20, V25, V30, V45, mean dose and MHD. All BNPn correlated significantly (p < 0.05) with V20, V25, V30, V45, mean dose and MHD. Four patients had a cardiac event; in the only subject who developed myocardial infarction, V20, V25, V30 and V45 were the highest and BNP increased from T1 and persisted high even at T12.

CONCLUSION

Our results confirm that BNP could be a useful minimally invasive marker of early RT related cardiac impairment.

Gefitinib enhances the effects of combined radiotherapy and 5-fluorouracil in a colorectal cancer cell line

PURPOSE

In a phase I/II trial, patients with locally advanced rectal cancer received preoperative radiotherapy (RT) and concurrent with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and gefitinib. Results were promising. To elucidate the molecular and biological effects, we replicated the schedule in the LoVo human colorectal adenocarcinoma cell line.

METHODS

RT (2 Gy daily for 3 days), 5-FU (0.3, 0.6, 1.25, 2.5, 5, 10 μM) and gefitinib (0.2, 0.4, 0.8 μM) were administered alone, in double combinations and all together. We assessed viable cells, cell cycle, cyclin, p53 and p21 expression, signalling pathways by means of phosphorylated epidermal growth factor receptor (p-EGFR), p-AKT and p-ERK 1-2 and clonogenic capacity.

RESULTS

RT and 5-FU were cytotoxic. Gefitinib was cytostatic. RT reduced clonogenic capacity more than 5-FU. 5-FU induced more cell death than RT, but surviving cells were proliferative (cyclins and p-EGFR increased). 5-FU + RT had a synergistic effect. Gefitinib, enhancing G1 accumulation, reduced proliferation of cells surviving 5-FU and 5-FU + RT. It slightly increased the cytotoxicity of RT and 5-FU.

CONCLUSIONS

As gefitinib limited the proliferation rate of cells surviving 5-FU and 5-FU + RT in the LoVo cell line, it may be a useful addition to chemotherapy and RT in rectal cancer patients.

Hypofractionated whole breast radiotherapy with or without hypofractionated boost in early stage breast cancer patients: a mono-institutional analysis of skin and subcutaneous toxicity

BACKGROUND

Our study evaluated skin and subcutaneous toxicity analyzing its correlation with patient- and treatment-related factors in a large mono-institutional series of women with early stage breast cancer treated with adjuvant hypofractionated whole breast radiotherapy (WBRT) with or without a sequential hypofractionated boost (HB).

METHODS

Two hundred and nineteen patients, median age 62 years, received adjuvant hypofractionated WBRT in 16 fractions to a total dose of 42.4 Gy. Patients with negative prognostic factors received a HB of 2.65 Gy for 4 or 5 (patients with focal positive surgical margins) fractions. Systemic adjuvant treatments were hormonal therapy (HT) and/or chemotherapy (CHT) and/or Trastuzumab. Toxicities were assessed using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE 4.03) scale at 5th, 10th, 16th, 20th day from the start of radiotherapy (RT) and 1, 6 and 12 months after the end of RT. Univariate and multivariate analysis estimated toxicity predictive factors.

RESULTS

No case of treatment interruption and no acute or late G3 toxicities occurred. In the univariate analysis HB administration resulted a risk factor for acute toxicity, while CHT administration and number of excised lymph nodes ≥ 10 resulted a risk factor for late toxicity. In the multivariate analysis none of the evaluated factors emerged a risk factor for acute and/or late toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results confirmed that hypofractionated WBRT even followed by a HB resulted safe and well tolerated. Longer follow-up is warranted to estimate late toxicity and treatment outcomes.

Statins Protect Against Acute RT-related Rectal Toxicity in Patients with Prostate Cancer: An Observational Prospective Study

AIM

To analyze risk factors for acute rectal toxicity during hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for prostate cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 195 patients received 74.25 Gy in 33 fractions to the prostate and, if involved, to the seminal vescicles (SV). When the risk of SV involvement was >15% according to the Roach's formula, they received 62 Gy in 33 fractions. Overall, 107/195 patients (54.87%) received hormonal therapy (luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogue, anti-androgen, or both). Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0 was used to classify rectal toxicity.

RESULTS

Acute rectal toxicity occurred in 79 (40.51%) patients (grade 1 in 44). In univariate analysis, use of calcium channel blockers significantly reduced the acute rectal toxicity rate and 3-hydroxy-methylglutaryl CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) significantly reduced the rectal toxicity rate and grade. In multivariate analysis, only statin use was an independent protective factor.

CONCLUSION

In patients with prostate cancer treated with a moderate hypofractionated IMRT schedule, use of statins lowered the incidence and grade of acute rectal toxicity.

Omission of adjuvant radiotherapy for older adults with early-stage breast cancer particularly in the COVID era: A literature review (on the behalf of Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology)

This review is aimed at evaluating whether radiation therapy (RT) can be omitted in older adult early-stage low-risk breast cancer (BC) patients. The published data are particularly relevant at present, during the COVID-19 pandemic emergency, to define a treatment strategy and to prioritize essential therapy. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and PubMED were systematically researched from outset through April 2020 using Mesh terms. Only randomized controlled trials (RCT), with one arm without adjuvant whole-breast irradiation (WBI), were included in the analysis. Recent literature regarding the COVID pandemic and BC RT was assessed. The reported RCTs identified a group of BC patients (pT1-2N0M0 R0, grade 1-2, estrogen receptor (ER) positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) negative tumours) in which the absolute risk of local recurrence (LR) was considered low enough to omit RT. The most common risk factors were tumor diameter, nodal and receptor status. Adjuvant RT had a significant impact on LR but not on distant metastasis (DM) or death. During the COVID 19 pandemic, results from RTCs were re-considered to define treatment recommendations for BC patients. International scientific societies and radiation oncology experts suggested RT omission, whenever possible, in older adult early-stage BC patients. Adjuvant RT might be omitted in a highly selected group of older adult early-stage BC patients with favourable prognostic factors. Hypofractionated regimens should be the standard. RT omission, partial breast irradiation (PBI), and ultra- hypofractionated regimens could be considered in selected cases due to the pandemic.

Heart and Coronary Artery Dose Sparing in Left-sided Breast Cancer: 3D-Conformal Radiotherapy vs. Helical Tomotherapy

BACKGROUND/AIM

To compare heart, left ventricle (LV) and coronary artery dose-sparing with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) vs. helical tomotherapy (HT) in left-sided breast cancer (BC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

3D-CRT and HT treatments were planned for 20 patients (pts). Computed tomography (CT) scans without and with intravenous contrast (ic) were performed and co-registered. Left breast and organs at risk (OARs) were contoured. Dose-volume histograms (DVHs) for 3D-CRT and HT treatment plans were evaluated in terms of planning target volume for evaluation (PTVeval) coverage and dose to the OARs.

RESULTS

HT provided the best target coverage and significantly reduced D2% and mean dose to the left anterior descending artery (LADA) and to the LADA-planning organ at risk volume (PRV), D2%, V5 and mean dose to the LV and D2% and V25 to the heart. As expected, due to the rotational delivery, the dose to all other coronary arteries and their PRV, contralateral breast and lungs was higher with HT.

CONCLUSION

In left-sided BC, HT provided the best target coverage and significantly reduced LV and LADA doses. Moreover D2% and V25 to the heart were significantly reduced. Further studies are needed to correlate dosimetric findings with in-depth cardiac monitoring.

Sequential Moderate Hypofractionated Boost in Breast Cancer Patients: A Monoinstitutional Analysis of Late Side Effects

BACKGROUND/AIM

In breast cancer (BC) patients who have received breast-conserving surgery, moderate hypofractionation is standard of care for whole-breast irradiation (HF-WBI). On the other hand, the fractionation schedule for the boost is less well defined. A previous prospective study of our group aimed at evaluating acute and late cutaneous and subcutaneous side effects related to a sequential hypofractionated boost (HB) in patients who had received HF-WBI. The present study aimed at evaluating late side effects at a longer follow-up.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From 2014 to 2015, 219 BC patients received moderate HF-WBI (42.4 Gy in 16 fractions) at the Radiation Oncology Section of the University of Perugia. Patients with negative prognostic factors received a HB (2.65 Gy for 4 or 5 fractions). Late side effects were assessed using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0. Univariate and multivariate analyses estimated predictive factors for late toxicity.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 8.6 years (range=6.7-9.6). One hundred and sixty-five patients were evaluable in the present analysis; HB was administered to 47.3% of them. Late cutaneous and subcutaneous side effects occurred in 26/165 patients (15.8%); and all were G1. In univariate analysis ≥10 excised lymph nodes and HB administration emerged as risk factors for late side effects (p=0.003 and p=0.041, respectively). In multivariate analysis only ≥10 excised lymph nodes were confirmed as a risk factor for side effects (OR=3.431; 95%CI=1.209-9.737).

CONCLUSION

HB after HF-WBI was safe and well-tolerated, even at a long-term follow-up; consequently, it can be used in routine practice.

Bone Health Care Pathway for Non-metastatic Prostate Cancer Patients on Radiation and Androgen Deprivation Therapy

BACKGROUND/AIM

Survival rates of prostate cancer (PCa) patients have improved considerably as a result of earlier diagnosis and therapies, including radiotherapy (RT) and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Patients on ADT develop cancer treatment-induced bone loss (CTIBL) and a high risk of fragility fractures. Bone health (BH) assessment is strongly recommended, together with timely initiation of treatments, to counteract CTIBL and preserve bone strength. Therefore, we decided to develop an interdisciplinary pathway of care (IPC) dedicated to non-metastatic PCa patients on long-term ADT and RT.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

An interdisciplinary team allocated resources to support an IPC to manage patients' CTIBL and prevent fragility fractures. The team provided a diagnostic and therapeutic workflow according to patients' and professional perspectives, consistent with recommendations and healthcare policies. The hospital's quality department certified the IPC, the Ethical Committee approved procedures over the workflow. The Fracture Liaison Service (FLS) standards inspired services and professionals' activities and interactions.

RESULTS

Preliminary data support the feasibility of the IPC from professionals' and patients' perspectives. Median age of the enrolled patients was 75 years, more than a half (58.9%) had low grade osteopenia or normal BMD (T-score ≥-1.5 standard deviation, SD), while 23.5% and 17.6% had osteoporosis and osteopenia, respectively. The IPC meets the requirements of a FLS concerning crucial indicators.

CONCLUSION

Our IPC was a suitable approach to assure timely identification, assessment, initiation, and monitoring of adherence to anti-fracture treatments among non-metastatic PCa patients on long-term ADT and RT. Further data are required to show its effectiveness on fragility fracture prevention.

Integrating stereotactic radiotherapy and systemic therapies

This paper focuses on stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT ) interactions with targeted therapies and immune system modulating agents because SRT inevitably interacts with them in the treatment of oligometastatic patients. Radiation oncologists need to be aware of the advantages and risks of these interactions which can, on one hand, enhance the effect of therapy or, on the other, potentiate reciprocal toxicities. To date, few prospective studies have evaluated the interactions of SRT with new-generation drugs and data are mainly based on retrospective experiences, which are often related to small sample sizes.