Radiogenomics: Hunting Down Liver Metastasis in Colorectal Cancer Patients

Simple Summary

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third leading cause of cancer and the second most deadly tumor type in the world. The liver is the most common site of metastasis in CRC patients. The conversion of new imaging biomarkers into diagnostic, prognostic and predictive signatures, by the development of radiomics and radiogenomics, is an important potential new tool for the clinical management of cancer patients. In this review, we assess the knowledge gained from radiomics and radiogenomics studies in liver metastatic colorectal cancer patients and their possible use for early diagnosis, response assessment and treatment decisions.

Abstract

Radiomics is a developing new discipline that analyzes conventional medical images to extract quantifiable data that can be mined for new biomarkers that show the biology of pathological processes at microscopic levels. These data can be converted into image-based signatures to improve diagnostic, prognostic and predictive accuracy in cancer patients. The combination of radiomics and molecular data, called radiogenomics, has clear implications for cancer patients’ management. Though some studies have focused on radiogenomics signatures in hepatocellular carcinoma patients, only a few have examined colorectal cancer metastatic lesions in the liver. Moreover, the need to differentiate between liver lesions is fundamental for accurate diagnosis and treatment. In this review, we summarize the knowledge gained from radiomics and radiogenomics studies in hepatic metastatic colorectal cancer patients and their use in early diagnosis, response assessment and treatment decisions. We also investigate their value as possible prognostic biomarkers. In addition, the great potential of image mining to provide a comprehensive view of liver niche formation is examined thoroughly. Finally, new challenges and current limitations for the early detection of the liver premetastatic niche, based on radiomics and radiogenomics, are also discussed.

SBRT in non-spine bone metastases: a literature review

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) is a technique for delivering high doses of radiation to tumors while preserving the normal tissues located around this area. Bone metastases are frequent in cancer patients. They can be distressingly painful or may cause pathological fractures. Radiation therapy is a fundamental aspect of treatment for bone metastases. The objective of this study is to analyze the literature on non-spine bone metastasis treated with SBRT, including immobilization, volume delineation, dose and fractionation, local control, side effects, and assessment of response after treatment. Full-text articles written in English language and published in the last 10 years were included in this review and were accessible on PubMed and MEDLINE. We examined 78 articles. A total of 40 studies were included in this review. Most were retrospective studies. The articles included were evaluated for content and validation. The immobilization systems and imaging tests used for tumor delimitation were variable between studies. The use of CTV (Clinical Target Volume) has not been defined. Doses and fractions were variable from 15 to 24 Gy/1 fraction to 24-50 Gy in 3-5 fractions, with local control being around 90% with a low rate of side effects. We review state of the art in SBRT non-spine metastases. SBRT can result in better local control and pain management in non-spine bone metastases patients. We need more research in volume delineation determining whether or not to use CTV and the role of MRI in volume contouring, optimal doses, and fractionation according to histology and a reliable response assessment tool. Studies that compare SBRT to conventional radiotherapy in local control and pain control are needed.

The Diet as a Modulator of Tumor Microenvironment in Colorectal Cancer Patients

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common cancers in Western countries and remains the second most common cause of cancer death worldwide. Many studies show the importance of diet and lifestyle in the incidence of CRC, as well as in CRC prevention. However, this review summarizes those studies that analyze the impact of nutrition on tumor microenvironment modulation and cancer progression. We review the available information about the effects of specific nutrients on cancer cell progression and on the different cells within the tumor microenvironment. Diet and nutritional status in the clinical management of colorectal cancer patients are also analyzed. Finally, future perspectives and challenges are discussed, with a view to improving CRC treatments by employing nutritional approaches. These promise great benefits and will eventually improve CRC patients' survival.

GOECP/SEOR radiotherapy guidelines for small-cell lung cancer

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) accounts for approximately 20% of all lung cancers. The main treatment is chemotherapy (Ch). However, the addition of radiotherapy significantly improves overall survival (OS) in patients with non-metastatic SCLC and in those with metastatic SCLC who respond to Ch. Prophylactic cranial irradiation reduces the risk of brain metastases and improves OS in both metastatic and non-metastatic patients. The 5-year OS rate in patients with limited-stage disease (non-metastatic) is slightly higher than 30%, but less than 5% in patients with extensive-stage disease (metastatic). The present clinical guidelines were developed by Spanish radiation oncologists on behalf of the Oncologic Group for the Study of Lung Cancer/Spanish Society of Radiation Oncology to provide a current review of the diagnosis, planning, and treatment of SCLC. These guidelines emphasise treatment fields, radiation techniques, fractionation, concomitant treatment, and the optimal timing of Ch and radiotherapy. Finally, we discuss the main indications for reirradiation in local recurrence.

Advances and controversies in the management of early stage non-small cell lung cancer

Complete resection continues to be the gold standard for the treatment of early-stage lung cancer. The landmark Lung Cancer Study Group trial in 1995 established lobectomy as the minimum intervention necessary for the management of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer, as it was associated with lower recurrence and metastasis rates than sublobar resection and lower postoperative morbidity and mortality than pneumonectomy. There is a growing tendency to perform sublobar resection in selected cases, as, depending on factors such as tumor size, histologic subtype, lymph node involvement, and resection margins, it can produce similar oncological results to lobectomy. Alternative treatments such as stereotactic body radiotherapy and radiofrequency ablation can also produce good outcomes in inoperable patients or patients who refuse surgery.

Radiation-induced liver disease in the era of SBRT: a review

INTRODUCTION

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) in liver tumors allows ablative radiation doses in tumors preserving the liver tissue. However, liver is a parallel organ allowing high doses in a small region to preserve its function. If this is not possible, radio-induced liver toxicity is produced. Radio-induced liver toxicity or radio-induced liver disease (RILD) is the most serious toxicity in liver radiotherapy.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, we analyzed published literature on PubMed and MEDLINE. We included papers in English language with information about RILD characteristics, diagnostic, risk factors, pathophysiology, and treatment. All citations were evaluated for relevant content and validation.

EXPERT OPINION

The study of RILD is fundamental before the implementation of liver SBRT. Radio-induced liver toxicity is a complication that can be fatal for patients. This is a diagnosis of exclusion and it is essential that experts in the treatment of hepatic SBRT know about it and anticipate its development. The study and development of molecular or imaging biomarkers could be key in their diagnosis and prevention.

Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy for ventricular tachycardia: An alternative therapy for refractory patients

Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) allows the administration of ablative doses of radiation in a focused form with a low probability of side effects and is widely used for cancer treatment. However, in the recent years its usefulness in benign cardiac pathology is being studied. In this study, we aimed to guide the cardiologist in SABR and its applications in treatment of refractory ventricular tachycardia. In this review, we analyzed published literature on PubMed and MEDLINE with papers published in the past 5 years. We included papers in the English language with information about indications, radiotherapy plan, doses and fractionations, and outcomes. All citations were evaluated for relevant content and validation.

Radiotherapy in Prostate Brain Metastases: A Review of the Literature

Brain metastases in prostate cancer are infrequent. Treatment of brain metastases includes radiotherapy. The aim of this literature review was to study whole brain radiotherapy, radiosurgery, and fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy and its applications in the treatment of prostate brain metastasis. We searched MEDLINE and PUBMED for articles published in the last 5 years and identified 153 articles. After examining them, 31 articles met the selection criteria and were included. Most were retrospective studies. MeSH terms used in the search included: prostate cancer OR prostate brain metastases AND radiotherapy, brain metastases AND radiotherapy AND prostate cancer. English language articles with information on the type of radiotherapy, doses and fractionation, indications, local control, toxicities, and survival of radiotherapy in prostate brain metastasis were included in this review. All articles were assessed for validity and relevant content. The usual treatment of prostate brain metastasis involves whole brain radiotherapy; however, the current trend in the metastases of prostate cancer and of other origins is the use of radiosurgery techniques or stereotactic body radiotherapy.

Radiomics in lung cancer for oncologists

Radiomics has revolutionized the world of medical imaging. The aim of this review is to guide oncologists in radiomics and its applications in diagnosis, prediction of response and damage, prediction of survival, and prognosis in lung cancer. In this review, we analyzed published literature on PubMed and MEDLINE with papers published in the last 10 years. We included papers in English language with information about radiomics features and diagnostic, predictive, and prognosis of radiomics in lung cancer. All citations were evaluated for relevant content and validation.

RELEVANCE FOR PATIENTS

The evolution of technology allows the development of computer algorithms that facilitate the diagnosis and evaluation of response after different oncological treatments and their non-invasive follow-up.

Brain metastases: Single-dose radiosurgery versus hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy: A retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Radiosurgery is employed for the treatment of brain metastases. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of single-dose radiosurgery (SRS) compared to hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (hFSRT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 2004 and 2018, we analyzed treatments of 97 patients with 135 brain metastases. Fifty-six patients were treated with SRS, and 41 patients were treated with hFSRT. Median dose was 16 Gy (12-20 Gy) for the SRS group and 30 Gy in 5-6 fractions for the hFSRT group. hFSRT was used for larger lesions and lesions located near critical structures. Kaplan-Meier curves were constructed for overall survival (OS) and local control (LC).

RESULTS

Median age was 64 years (range, 32-89 years). Median survival was 10 months (1-68 months). With a median follow-up of 10 months, no significant differences in OS between groups were found (P=0.21). LC for all patients was 67%. Local progression-free survival (LPFS) at 6 months and 1 year was 71% and 60% for the SRS group, respectively, and 80% and 69% for the hFSRT group, respectively (P=0.93). Although hFSRT was used for larger lesions and lesions in adverse locations, LPFS was not inferior compared to lesions treated with SRS. We observed acute toxicity grade 1-2 in 25 patients (25.8%). Late complications were observed in 11 patients (11.3%). Acute and late toxicity was similar in the SRS- and hFSRT-treated patients (P=0.63 and P=0.11, respectively). Brain recurrence occurred in 37.5% and 14.6% in the hFSRT and SRS group, respectively (P=0.06).

CONCLUSIONS

Since patients treated with hFSRT exhibited similar survival and LPFS rates without differences in toxicity compared to those treated with SRS, hFSRT can be beneficial, particularly for patients with brain metastases.

RELEVANCE FOR PATIENTS

Hypofractionated schemes in stereotactic radiosurgery offers treatment alternatives to patients with large lesions or lesions near critical structures.

Interobserver variability in gross tumor volume contouring in non-spine bone metastases

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The optimal imaging test for gross tumor volume (GTV) delineation in non-spine bone metastases has not been defined. The use of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) requires accurate target delineation. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and/or ¹⁸fludesoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18FDG-PET) allow for better visualization of the extent of bone metastases and optimizes the accuracy of tumor delineation for stereotactic radiotherapy compared to computed tomography (CT) alone. We evaluated the interobserver agreement in GTV of non-spine bone metastases in a single center and compared MRI and/or 18FDG-PET and CT in GTV delineation.

METHODS

Anonymous CT and MRI and/or 18FDG-PET obtained from 10 non-spine bone metastases were analyzed by six radiation oncologists at our center. Images acquired by CT and MRI and/or 18FDG-PET were used to delineate 10 GTVs of non-spine bone metastases in the pelvis, extremities, and skull. The cases showed different characteristics: blastic and lytic metastases, and different primary cancers (lung, breast, prostate, rectum, urothelial, and biliary). In both CT and MRI and/or 18FDG-PET, the GTV volumes were compared. The index of agreement was evaluated according to Landis and Koch protocol.

RESULTS

The GTV volume as defined on MRI was in all cases larger or at least as large as the GTV volume on CT (P=0.25). The median GTV volume on MRI was 3.15 cc (0.027-70.64 cc) compared to 2.8 cc on CT (0.075-77.95 cc). Interobserver variance and standard deviation were lower in CT than MRI (576.3 vs. 722.2 and 24.0 vs. 26.9, respectively). The level of agreement was fair (kappa=0.36) between CT and MRI. The median GTV volume on 18FDG-PET in five patients was 5.8 cc (0.46-64.17 cc), compared to 4.1 cc on CT (0.99-54.2 cc) (P=0.236). Interobserver variance and standard deviation in CT, MRI, and 18FDG-PET were 576.3 versus 722.2 versus 730.5 and 24 versus 26.9 versus 27.0, respectively. The level of agreement was slight (kappa=0.08) between CT and 18FDG-PET.

CONCLUSIONS

Interobserver variance in non-spine bone metastases was equal when MRI and PET were compared to CT. CT was associated with the lowest variance and standard deviation. Compared to CT GTVs, the GTVs rendered from MRI images had fair agreement, while the GTVs rendered from 18FDG-PET had only slight agreement.

RELEVANCE FOR PATIENTS

The delimitation of the treatment volume in non-spine bone metastases with SBRT is important for the results determining its efficacy. It is therefore essential to know the variability and to manage it to achieve the highest quality of treatment.

Interobserver Variability in Contouring Hepatocellular Carcinoma at a Tertiary Center

BACKGROUND/AIM

The optimal imaging test for delineation of the gross tumor volume (GTV) in hepatocellular carcinoma has not been defined. The hypothesis is that magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) allows for better visualization of the extent of tumor and will optimize the accuracy of tumor delineation for liver stereotactic radiotherapy compared with computed tomography (CT) only. We evaluated the interobserver agreement in GTV of hepatocellular carcinoma in a multicenter panel and compared MRI and CT in GTV delineation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

After the institutional review boards approved the study, we analyzed anonymous CT and MRI obtained from five patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Eight radiation oncologists at our center used CT and MRI to delineate five GTVs of liver tumors. In both CT and MRI, the GTV volumes were compared.

RESULTS

The median GTV volume on MRI was 2.4 cm³ (range=0.59-15.6 cm³) compared to 3.5 cm³ (range=0.52-24.9 cm³) on CT (p=0.36). The GTV volume as defined on MRI was larger or at least as large as the GTV volume on CT in two cases. Variance and standard deviation between observers in CT and MRI were minor (6 vs. 7.87 cm³, and 2.5 vs. 2.8 cm³ respectively).

CONCLUSION

In cases with well-defined tumors, CT is easier and reproducible. In cases with no defined tumor in CT, other tools are needed and MRI can be complementary. The interobserver variability in target delineation of hepatocellular carcinoma in this study is noteworthy.