Erythema nodosum in renal transplant recipients: multiple cases and review of literature

We report 4 renal transplant recipients with erythema nodosum. Erythema nodosum is a cutaneous inflammatory reaction located on the anterior aspects of the lower extremities. It may be associated with a wide variety of diseases, including infections (as in Cases 1 and 2), sarcoidosis, rheumatologic diseases, inflammatory bowel diseases (as in Case 3), medications (as in Case 4), autoimmune disorders, pregnancy, and malignancies. Histopathologically, erythema nodosum is the stereotypical example of a mostly septal panniculitis with no vasculitis, and the inflammatory infiltrate in the septa varies with age of the lesion. In early lesions edema, hemorrhage, and neutrophils are responsible for the septal thickening, whereas fibrosis, peri-septal granulation tissue, lymphocytes, and multinucleated giant cells are the main findings in late stage. Etiological management - by anti-tuberculous therapy in Cases 1 and 2, by salazopyrin in Case 3, and by discontinuation of ciprofloxacin in Case 4 - was associated with regression. Erythema nodosum can develop in renal transplant patients who did not receive induction therapy, non-rejecters, and those with steroid-free protocols. Management of erythema nodosum should be directed to the underlying associated condition, which could be tuberculosis, inflammatory bowel disease, or drug related.

Efficacy and safety of Monascus purpureus Went rice in children and young adults with secondary hyperlipidemia: a preliminary report

BACKGROUNDS/AIMS

Nephrotic dyslipidemia is a risk factor for development of systemic atherosclerosis; also it may aggravate glomerulosclerosis and enhance progression of glomerular disease. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of Monascus purpureus Went rice vs. fluvastatin therapy in the management of nephrotic dyslipidemia.

METHODS

Seventy-two patients with idiopathic persistent nephrotic syndrome with secondary dyslipidemia were included. They were randomly allocated into 3 - age and sex - matched groups. The first group comprised of 20 cases and were given Monascus purpureus Went rice, second group comprised 30 cases were given fluvastatin. The remaining 22 received no anti-dyslipidemic therapy and constituted a control group. All of these patients were subjected to thorough laboratory investigations including renal function tests, lipogram and neurological assessment.

RESULTS

Our results showed that both fluvastatin and Monascus purpureus Went rice were well-tolerated with no significant side effects. Both of them significantly reduced cholesterol after 6 months and 1 year. In comparison to baseline values, fluvastatin achieved a significant and progressive reduction of serum cholesterol by 35%, 38% and 42% at 3 months, 6 months and after 1 year respectively (p<0.001). Similar reductions were observed in the Monascus purpureus Went rice group. After one year we observed that serum cholesterol was significantly lower in statin and Monascus purpureus Went rice groups compared to the control group.

CONCLUSION

Monascus purpureus Went rice is safe, effective cholesterol lowering agent for nephrotic dyslipidemia both in adults and children.

Study of the effect of donor source on graft and patient survival in pediatric renal transplant recipients

Evaluation of the impact of live unrelated kidney donor (LURD) source on the outcome of renal transplantation is not adequately studied. We aimed to compare the long-term outcome of kidney transplantation from LURDs to that from living related donors (LRDs) among a pediatric recipient population. This study comprised 235 pediatric recipients who received their kidney grafts between 1976 and 2005 at our center. These patients were further subdivided into two groups according to donor source (211 with LRDs) and (24 with LURDs). All patients' data were assessed with special emphasis on graft and patient survival as well as posttransplant medical complications. Both groups were comparable regarding graft and patient survival at 1, 5, and 10 years. Despite higher incidence of acute vascular rejection among recipients with LURD (12%) vs. LRD (2.8%) (P = 0.03), there was no difference in the incidence of chronic allograft nephropathy. Moreover, the overall incidence of posttransplant complications was comparable among the two groups. In our series, kidney survival was poorer in LURDs compared with LRDs. However, the number of patients with LURD was small, and the difference in results was also small and justifies LURD in exceptional cases when LRD is not possible.

Comparative analysis of azathioprine versus cyclosporine-based therapy in primary haplo-identical live-donor kidney transplantation: a 20-year experience

Chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) remains a major cause of graft failure over the long term, second only to patient mortality. The main adverse effects of cyclosporine A (CsA) include nephrotoxicity, hypertension, symptomatic hyperuricemia, hirsutism, and gum hyperplasia. Available studies among live related donor renal transplants lack adequate information regarding the long-term efficacy and safety of primary CsA-based immunosuppressive regimens. This prospective randomized study is aimed at evaluating the long-term results of CsA-based immunosuppressive protocols in live-donor kidney transplantation. The follow-up data of 444 renal transplant recipients operated at the Urology and Nephrology Center, Mansoura University, prior to 1996 were reviewed. Primary immuno-suppressive protocols included: steroids and azathioprine (group I, 130 cases); steroids and CsA (group II, 75 cases); and steroids, CsA, and azathioprine (group III, 239 cases). Only adult primary renal transplant recipients with age ranging between 18 and 60 years and one haplotype HLA mismatch with the donor were included. All patients received kidneys from living related donors with previous donor non-specific blood transfusions. The percentage of cases with chronic rejection was significantly higher in group III. Living cases with graft failure were significantly higher in group III, whereas mortality was significantly higher in group I. Diabetic patients and those with serious bacterial infections were significantly more prevalent in group II. Hypertensive patients were significantly more common in groups I and II. Liver disease was more prevalent among patients in group III. Our study suggests that the long-term results of treatment with steroids and azathioprine are satisfactory in live related donor kidney transplant recipients. Chronic rejection was significantly higher in patients in group III, possibly due to the risk of CsA nephrotoxicity. Groups with CsA-based protocols experienced many adverse reactions of CsA such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and chronic rejection.

Hepatic dysfunction in kidney transplant recipients: prevalence and impact on graft and patient survival

BACKGROUND

Liver disease has emerged as an important cause of morbidity and mortality in renal transplant recipients. Liver insufficiency is the cause of death in up to 28% of long-term survivors after renal transplantation. The aim of this work was to evaluate the prevalence and causes of hepatic dysfunction in renal transplant recipients in Egypt, and its impact on both renal graft function and patient survival.

METHODS

This study comprised 447 kidney transplant recipients who received their grafts between January 1999 and December 2003 at Mansoura Urology and Nephrology Center. Among these recipients, 104 patients showed persistent hepatic dysfunction, while the remaining 343 had normal liver function or transient hepatic dysfunction of less than 6 months' duration.

RESULTS

We found that the prevalence of persistent hepatic dysfunction in our recipients was 23.3%. Infections such as hepatitis C virus (HCV;, with longer dialysis duration and blood transfusion as risk factors), HBV, and cytomegalovirus (CMV), were the main causes of persistent hepatic dysfunction. Drugs (e.g., the sirolimus and tacrolimus; cyclosporine; and azathioprine) were also associated with hepatic dysfunction. We did not find a significant impact of hepatic dysfunction on either patient or graft survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Viral infections-especially HCV and CMV-were more prevalent in the group of patients with persistent hepatic dysfunction, with duration of dialysis as an important risk factor for HCV infection. Dose-dependent cyclosporine-induced hepatic dysfunction was observed early post-transplant. Neither tacrolimus- nor sirolimus-associated hepatic dysfunction was dose-dependent. Hepatic dysfunction had no significant impact on either patient or graft survival; however, this finding may be due to the relatively short duration of follow up.

Prospective randomized study of azathioprine vs cyclosporine based therapy in primary haplo-identical living-donor kidney transplantation: 20-year experience

BACKGROUND

The achievements in short-term graft survival since the introduction of cyclosporine (CsA) have not been matched by improvements in long-term graft function. Chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) remains the second most common cause of graft attrition over time, after patient mortality. We aimed to evaluate the long-term results of azathioprine vs CsA in live-donor kidney transplantation in a prospective randomized study.

METHODS

We studied 475 renal transplant recipients who had had transplantations performed at the Urology and Nephrology Center, Mansoura University, before 1988 and who had received a primary immunosuppressive protocol consisting of either steroid and azathioprine (steroid/Aza; group 1, 300 patients) or steroid and CsA (steroid/CsA; group 2, 175 patients). Only adult primary renal transplant recipients aged between 18 and 60 years and with one haplotype HLA mismatch were included. All patients received kidneys from living-related donors, with previous donor nonspecific blood transfusions. The study was based on the long-term follow-up data of these renal transplant recipients. Comparative analyses included patient and graft survival rates, condition at last follow up, rejection (acute and chronic), and graft function (serum creatinine and creatinine clearance).

RESULTS

The overall frequency of acute rejection episodes was not significantly different between the two groups. Graft survival rates were: group 1 vs group 2, 69% vs 58% at 5 years, and 52% vs 36% at 10 years, but at 20 years, graft survival rates had declined to 26% and 24%. No significant differences were encountered between the two groups regarding post-transplant malignancies, diabetes mellitus, hepatic impairment, or serious bacterial infections.

CONCLUSIONS

From this study we can conclude that the long-term result of historical conventional therapy (steroid/Aza) without induction therapy is effective for living-donor kidney transplants. In spite of the comparable graft function for the two groups, the steroid/CsA group experienced more hypertension, as well as many adverse reactions to CsA. Nowadays, since the introduction of induction therapy and the utilization of newer maintenance immunosuppressive agents - such as mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and rapamycin - it is possible to achieve an excellent calcineurin inhibitors (CNI)-free regimen.