Mediastinitis in open heart surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of risk factors

Objective. We aimed to summarize the evidence from observational studies examining the risk factors of the incidence of mediastinitis in open heart surgery. Design. The study was a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohorts and case-control studies. Material and methods. We searched the literature and 74 studies with at least one risk factor were identified. Both fixed and random effects models were used. Heterogeneity between studies was examined by subgroup and meta-regression analysis. Publication bias or small study effects were evaluated and corrected by limit meta-analysis. Results. When correcting for small study effect, presence of obesity as estimated from 43 studies had Odds Ratio OR = 2.26. (95% CI: 2.17-2.36). This risk was increasing with decreasing latitude of study place. Presence of diabetes mellitus from 63 studies carried an OR = 1.90 (95% CI: 1.59-2.27). Presence of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) from 30 studies had an OR = 2.59 (95% CI: 2.22-2.85). Presence of bilateral intramammary graft (BIMA) from 23 studies carried an OR = 2.54 (95% CI: 2.07-3.13). This risk was increasing with increasing frequency of female patients in the study population. Conclusion. Evidence from this study showed the robustness of the risk factors in the pathogenesis of mediastinitis. Preventive measures can be implemented for reducing obesity, especially in lower latitude countries. Furthermore, it is mandatory to monitor perioperative hyperglycemias with continuous insulin infusion. Use of skeletonized BIMA carries higher risk of mediastinitis especially in female patients without evidence of beneficial effect on survival for the time being.

Latitude of the study place and age of the patient are associated with incidence of mediastinitis and microbiology in open-heart surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective

We aimed to summarize the pooled frequency of mediastinitis following open-heart surgery caused by Gram-positive bacteria, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), and Gram-negative bacteria.

Design

This study was a systematic review and a meta-analysis of prospective and retrospective cohort studies.

Materials and methods

We searched the literature, and a total of 97 cohort studies were identified. Random-effect model was used to synthesize the results. Heterogeneity between studies was examined by subgroup and meta-regression analyses, considering study and patient-level variables. Small-study effect was evaluated.

Results

Substantial heterogeneity was present. The estimated incidence of mediastinitis evaluated from 97 studies was 1.58% (95% confidence intervals [CI] 1.42, 1.75) and that of Gram-positive bacteria, Gram-negative bacteria, and MRSA bacteria evaluated from 63 studies was 0.90% (95% CI 0.81, 1.21), 0.24% (95% CI 0.18, 0.32), and 0.08% (95% CI 0.05, 0.12), respectively. A meta-regression pinpointed negative association between the frequency of mediastinitis and latitude of study place and positive association between the frequency of mediastinitis and the age of the patient at operation. Multivariate meta-regression showed that prospective cohort design and age of the patients and latitude of study place together or in combination accounted for 17% of heterogeneity for end point frequency of mediastinitis, 16.3% for Gram-positive bacteria, 14.7% for Gram-negative bacteria, and 23.3% for MRSA bacteria.

Conclusion

Evidence from this study suggests the importance of latitude of study place and advanced age as risk factors of mediastinitis. Latitude is a marker of thermally regulated bacterial virulence and other local surgical practice. There is concern of increasing risk of mediastinitis and of MRSA in elderly patients undergoing sternotomy.

Postconditioning in ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a systematic review, critical appraisal, and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

Objective

We aimed to summarize the evidence from randomized clinical trials studies examining the efficacy of ischemic postconditioning (IPost) in ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

Design

The study was a systematic review and critical appraisal, with meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Materials and methods

We searched the literature. A total of 21 randomized clinical trials were identified. Both fixed effect and random effects models were used to synthesize the results of individual studies. Heterogeneity between studies was examined by subgroup and random effects meta-regression analyses, considering ptient-related and study-level variables. Publication bias, or “small-study effect”, was evaluated.

Results

Substantial heterogeneity was present. The random effects model pooled estimate for the outcome infarct size assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance was estimated by the standardized mean difference (SMD) =−0.06, 95% confidence interval (CI): −0.34 to 0.21, ie, no effect of IPost. For the end point infarct size, estimated by biomarkers of myocardial necrosis, an overall pooled effect was SMD =−0.58, 95% CI: −0.96 to −0.19. This effect disappeared in powered and nonbiased studies (SMD =0.03, 95% CI: −0.48 to 0.55). Finally, for the outcome left ventricular ejection fraction, SMD =0.47 95% CI: 0.20 to 0.74. Unfortunately, selection bias (small-study effect) was present. For this outcome, the meta-regression showed that both presence of hypertension and the inclusion of nonbiased studies explained 28.3% of the heterogeneity among the studies. Simulation by the “trim and fill” method, which controlled for selection bias using random effects model, diluted the effect (SMD =0.17 95% CI: −0.13 to 0.48). No effects by IPost on ST-segment resolution or on the majority of adverse clinical events were observed during follow up, except the incidence of congestive heart failure was found.

Conclusion

Evidence from this study suggests no cardioprotection from IPost, on surrogate and the majority of clinical end points. A possible beneficial effect on the incidence of congestive heart failure needs to be replicated by a large clinical trial.

Ethnicity and acute myocardial infarction: risk profile at presentation, access to hospital management, and outcome in Norway

Background

Previous studies in North America have shown ethnic variation in the presentation of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), and sex and racial differences in the management and outcome of AMI. In the present study, our aim was to investigate the risk profile of AMI for patients with minority background compared with indigenous Norwegians, at hospital presentation, and to investigate racial differences in hospital care and outcomes.

Patients and methods

A dual-design study was adopted: a cross-sectional study to examine ethnic differences of risk prevalence at hospital presentation and a cohort study to estimate access to angiography, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and hospital and long-term mortality. From a study population of 3105 patients with AMI presenting at Oslo University Hospital between January 1, 2006 and December 31, 2007, we identified 147 cases of AMI in patients with minority background and selected a random sample of 588 indigenous Norwegians with AMI as controls. Prognostic and explanatory strategies were used in the analysis.

Results

Compared with indigenous Norwegians with AMI, AMI patients with minority background suffered their AMI 10 years younger, were generally male, were twice as likely to be smokers, three times as likely to have type 2 diabetes, had lower high-density lipoprotein levels. This group also had 50% less history of hypertension. In terms of hospital care, AMI patients with minority background had shorter times from onset of symptoms to PCI and the same frequency of access to angiography and acute PCI as indigenous Norwegians when adjusting for the confounding effect of age, sex, and nature of myocardial infarction with or without ST elevation.

Conclusion

At presentation to hospital, patients with minority background had a higher risk profile and a shorter time from onset of symptoms to admission to catheterization laboratory than indigenous Norwegians, but the same access to angiography and acute PCI during hospitalization.