EuroSurg Collaborative and STARSurg Collaborative . Extended pharmacological thromboprophylaxis and clinically relevant venous thromboembolism after major abdominal and pelvic surgery: international, prospective, propensity score-weighted cohort study

BACKGROUND

There is low-certainty evidence on the impact of extended pharmacological prophylaxis on venous thromboembolism-associated morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy and safety of extended prophylaxis after major abdominopelvic surgery for the prevention of clinically relevant venous thromboembolism after hospital discharge.

METHODS

CArdiovaSCulAr outcomes after major abDominal surgEry (CASCADE) was a prospective, international, cohort study into which consecutive adult patients undergoing major abdominopelvic surgery were enrolled (January-May 2022). Extended prophylaxis was considered at least 28 days of anticoagulant prescription after surgery. The primary efficacy outcome was clinically relevant venous thromboembolism and the primary safety outcome was clinically relevant bleeding within 30 days after surgery (European Medicines Agency definitions). The independent association of these outcomes with extended prophylaxis was explored using mixed-effects logistic regression and propensity score weighting.

RESULTS

A total of 11 571 patients (median age of 58.0 years; 6399 (55.3%) women) from 29 countries were included. The extended prophylaxis prescription rate was 31.7% (3670 patients). The post-discharge venous thromboembolism and bleeding rates were 0.1% (12 patients) and 0.7% (85 patients) respectively. After weighting, extended prophylaxis was not significantly associated with increased bleeding risk (OR 1.07 (95% c.i. 0.64 to 1.81); P = 0.792) or decreased venous thromboembolism incidence, both in the overall cohort (OR 1.13 (95% c.i. 0.33 to 3.90); P = 0.848) and in a subgroup analysis of patients undergoing complex major surgery and with active cancer (OR: 1.36 (95% c.i. 0.33 to 5.57); P = 0.669).

CONCLUSION

In modern practice, the incidence of postoperative venous thromboembolism is low. Extended prophylaxis appears safe, yet the clinical efficacy remains uncertain. Further work is required to define patients who stand to benefit.

30-day Morbidity and Mortality after Cholecystectomy for Benign Gallbladder Disease (AMBROSE): A Prospective, International Collaborative Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess 30-day morbidity and mortality rates following cholecystectomy for benign gallbladder disease and identify the factors associated with complications.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Although cholecystectomy is common for benign gallbladder disease, there is a gap in the knowledge of the current practice and variations on a global level.

METHODS

A prospective, international, observational collaborative cohort study of consecutive patients undergoing cholecystectomy for benign gallbladder disease from participating hospitals in 57 countries between January 1 and June 30, 2022, was performed. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to identify preoperative and operative variables associated with 30-day postoperative outcomes.

RESULTS

Data of 21,706 surgical patients from 57 countries were included in the analysis. A total of 10,821 (49.9%), 4,263 (19.7%), and 6,622 (30.5%) cholecystectomies were performed in the elective, emergency, and delayed settings, respectively. Thirty-day postoperative complications were observed in 1,738 patients (8.0%), including mortality in 83 patients (0.4%). Bile leaks (Strasberg grade A) were reported in 278 (1.3%) patients and severe bile duct injuries (Strasberg grades B-E) were reported in 48 (0.2%) patients. Patient age, ASA physical status class, surgical setting, operative approach and Nassar operative difficulty grade were identified as the five predictors demonstrating the highest relative importance in predicting postoperative complications.

CONCLUSION

This multinational observational collaborative cohort study presents a comprehensive report of the current practices and outcomes of cholecystectomy for benign gallbladder disease. Ongoing global collaborative evaluations and initiatives are needed to promote quality assurance and improvement in cholecystectomy.

Ex-situ normothermic machine perfusion prevents ischemic cholangiopathy after liver transplantation: A meta-regression analysis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Liver transplantation (LT) is the gold standard for end-stage liver disease, but ischemic cholangiopathy (IC) remains a significant complication. Ex-situ normothermic machine perfusion (ESNMP) has emerged as a potential strategy to mitigate ischemic injury. However, the effect of ESNMP on reducing post-LT IC remains controversial. This study aimed to perform an updated meta-analysis to evaluate the impact of ESNMP on IC incidence.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following PRISMA guidelines. The literature search included studies from 2015 to 2025 comparing LT outcomes using ESNMP vs. static cold storage (SCS). The primary outcome was the incidence of IC. Risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-E tool. Statistical analysis, including random-effects meta-analysis, sensitivity analysis, and meta-regression, was performed to evaluate heterogeneity, potential confounders, and the impact of follow-up duration.

RESULTS

Seventeen studies, including 76,045 patients (4843 ESNMP; 71,202 SCS), were analyzed. No statistically significant difference in IC incidence was found between ESNMP and SCS (1.3 % vs. 0.6 %; RR = 0.68, 95 %CI = 0.41-1.13; P = 0.14). Sensitivity analysis excluding one outlier study revealed a reduction in IC risk with ESNMP (RR = 0.62, 95 %CI = 0.38-1.01; P = 0.054). Two sub-analyses of studies with ≥12 months of follow-up (RR = 0.51, 95 %CI = 0.26-0.99; P = 0.049) and DCDs (RR = 0.33, 95 %CI = 0.16-0.67; P = 0.002) showed risk reduction. The meta-regression revealed that the back-to-base perfusion approach was associated with the occurrence of IC, with an OR of 1.03 (95 %CI = 1.00-1.07, P = 0.035).

CONCLUSIONS

a correlation between ESNMP use and IC reduced risk appears to exist, especially with longer follow-up periods and DCDs, though more high-quality studies are needed to confirm this finding.

Graft weight integration in the early allograft dysfunction formula improves the prediction of early graft loss after liver transplantation

The role of the graft-to-recipient weight ratio (GRWR) in adult liver transplantation (LT) has been poorly investigated so far. The aim is to evaluate the contribution of the GRWR to the well-recognized early allograft dysfunction (EAD) model (i.e., Olthoff model) for the prediction of 90-day graft loss after LT in adults. Three hundred thirty-one consecutive adult patients undergoing LT between 2009 and 2018 at Tor Vergata and Sapienza University in Rome, Italy, served as the Training-Set. The Validation-Set included 123 LTs performed at the Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. The mEAD model for 90-day graft loss included the following variables: GRWR [Formula: see text] 1.57 = 2.5, GRWR [Formula: see text] 2.13 = 2.5, total bilirubin ≥ 10.0 mg/dL = 2.0, INR ≥ 1.60 = 2.3, and aminotransferase > 2000 IU/L = 2.2. The mEAD model showed an AUC = 0.74 (95%CI = 0.66-0.82; p < 0.001) and AUC = 0.68 (95%CI = 0.58-0.88; p = 0.01) in the Training-Set and Validation-Set, respectively, outperforming conventional EAD in both cohorts (Training-Set: AUC = 0.64, 95%CI = 0.57-0.72; p = 0.001; Validation-Set: AUC = 0.52, 95%CI = 0.35-0.69, p = 0.87). Incorporation of graft weight in a composite multivariate model allowed for better prediction of patients who presented an aminotransferase peak > 2000 IU/L after LT (OR = 2.39, 95%CI = 1.47-3.93, p = 0.0005). The GRWR is important in determining early graft loss after adult LT, and the mEAD model is a useful predictive tool in this perspective, which may assist in improving the graft allocation process.

COVID-19 in a pregnant kidney transplant recipient - what we need to know: A case report

BACKGROUND

In the era of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, kidney tran splant recipients are more susceptible to severe acute respiratory syndrome co ronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) infection, developing severe morbidity and graft im pairment. Pregnant women are also more likely to develop severe COVID-19 di sease, causing pregnancy complications such as preterm births and acute kidney injury.

CASE SUMMARY

Herein, we report the case of a pregnant woman with a third kidney tran splantation who developed COVID-19 disease. The reduction of immunosuppressive drugs and strict monitoring of trough blood levels were needed to avoid severe SARS-CoV-2-related complications, and permitted to continue a healthy pregnancy and maintain good graft function. In such a complex scenario, the con comitance of COVID-19-related morbidity, the risk of acute rejection in the hype rimmune recipient, graft dysfunction and pregnancy complications make the management of immunosuppression a very difficult task and clinicians must be aware.

CONCLUSION

Tailoring the immunosuppressive regimen is a key factor affecting both the graft outcome and pregnancy safety.

Current management of hepatobiliary malignancies between centers with or without a liver transplant program: A multi-society national survey

BACKGROUND

Availability of liver transplantation (LT) as a treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and other liver malignancies may determine heterogeneity of therapeutic strategies across different centers.

AIMS

To investigate the practice between hepato-biliary centers without (HB centers) and with a LT program (LT centers), we launched a 38-item web-based national survey, with directors of centers as a target.

METHODS

The survey, including 4 clinical vignettes, collected data on their approach to HCC and transplant oncology.

RESULTS

After duplicates removal, 75 respondents were considered. Respondents from LT centers (n = 22, 29.3 %) were more in favor of LT in the case of HCC outside Milan criteria (90.9 % vs. 67.9 %, p = 0.037), recurrent HCC (95.5 % vs. 50.9 %, p = 0.002) and other malignancies such as cholangiocarcinoma or neuroendocrine tumors. No significant difference was observed concerning the proportion of centers favorable to LT for unresectable colorectal liver metastases (100 % vs. 88.7 %, p = 0.100).

CONCLUSION

This national survey showed how management of HCC and awareness of transplant oncology may differ between HB and LT centers. Effective networking between HB and LT centers is crucial to provide optimal treatment and access to LT.

Immunosuppression protocols for emerging oncological indications in liver transplantation: A systematic review and pooled analysis

The evolving field of liver transplant (LT) oncology calls for tailored immunosuppression protocols to minimize the risk of tumor recurrence. We systematically reviewed the available evidence from inception to May 2023 regarding immunosuppression protocols used in patients undergoing LT for cholangiocarcinoma, neuroendocrine tumors (NET), hepatic-endothelial hemangioendothelioma, and colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) to identify common practices and to evaluate their association with oncological outcomes. Studies not involving humans, case reports, and short case series (ie, n < 10) were excluded. Among 3374 screened references, we included 117 studies involving 6797 patients distributed as follows: cholangiocarcinoma (58.1%), NETs (18.8%), hepatic-endothelial hemangioendothelioma (7.7%), CRLM (6.8%), mixed neoplasms (6.8%), or others (1.7%). Only 41% of the studies disclosed details of the immunosuppression protocol, and 20.8% of studies provided drug trough concentrations during follow-up. The immunosuppression protocols described were heterogeneous and broadly mirrored routine practices for nontumoral indications. The only exception was CRLM, where tacrolimus minimization-or even withdrawal-in combination with inhibitors of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTORi) were consistently reported. None of the studies evaluated the relationship between the immunosuppression protocol and oncological outcomes. In conclusion, based on low-quality and indirect scientific evidence, patients with tumoral indications for LT should receive the lowest tacrolimus level tolerated under close surveillance. The combination with mTORi titrated to achieve the top therapeutic range of trough concentrations could allow complete tacrolimus withdrawal. This approach may be particularly useful in patients with cholangiocarcinoma and CRLM, in whom tumor recurrence is the main cause of death. We propose a tool for reporting immunosuppression protocols, which could be implemented in future transplant oncology studies.

The impact of center volume on the utilization and outcomes of machine perfusion technology in liver transplantation: An international survey

INTRODUCTION

Machine perfusion (MP) was developed to expand the donor pool and improve liver transplantation (LT) outcomes. Despite optimal results in clinical trials, the real-world MP benefit in centers with low-/mid-volume activity (LVCs) is still being determined.

METHODS

Online survey on MP for LT, distributed to worldwide LT-centers representatives. Variables of interest included logistics, technicalities, and outcomes. Responders were grouped into high-volume centers (HVCs) (>60 LTs/year) and LVCs and results compared.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven centers were included, 36 HVCs and 31 LVCs. Significant differences in MP regarded: (I) existence of an established program (80.6% vs. 41.9%; p = 0.02), (II) presence of a dedicated perfusionist (58.3% vs. 22.6%; p = 0.006), (III) duration (>4 h: 47.2% vs. 16.1%; p = 0.01), (IV) routine use (20%-40% vs. 5%-20%; p = 0.002), (V) graft utilization (>50%: 75% vs. 51.6%; p = 0.009), (VI) 90-day patient-survival (90%-100% vs. 50%-90%; p = 0.001) and (VII) subjectively perceived benefit (always vs. only in selected ECD; p = 0.009). Concordance was found for indications, type, viability tests, graft-salvage, 90-day graft-loss, and major-complications.

CONCLUSIONS

This study captured a picture of MP in real-world LT-practice. Significant disparities have surfaced between LVCs and HVCs regarding logistics, utilization, and results. To close this gap, efforts should be made to more efficiently deliver dedicated support, training and mentoring to LVC teams adopting MP technology.

The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Pathway Is Safe, Feasible and Cost-Effective in Delayed Graft Function After Kidney Transplant

Background/Objectives: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways are still underutilized in kidney transplantation (KT), and their feasibility after delayed graft function (DGF) is unknown. We aimed to evaluate safety and cost savings after ERAS implementation in KT recipients with DGF. Methods: A retrospective analysis of KT recipients enrolled in the ERAS program with DGF (≥1 dialytic treatment during the first postoperative week or creatinine≥ 2.5 mg/dL on postoperative day 10) between 2010 and 2019 was performed. Recipient, donor, and transplant data, outcomes, and 1-year post-KT costs were collected, comparing recipients within the ERAS target (≤5 days, "early discharge group") to those discharged later (>5 days, "late discharge group"). Results: Out of 170 KT recipients with DGF, 33 (19.4%) were in the "early discharge group" and 137 (80.5%) in the "late discharge group". Recipient, donor, and transplant characteristics were similar in the two groups. The length of hospital stay (LOS) of the "early discharge group" was significantly shorter, with fewer in-hospital dialysis sessions (p < 0.001) compared to the "late discharge group". One year post-KT, no significant differences were observed in postoperative complications, readmissions, or number of outpatient visits. Five-year graft and patient survival along with five-year graft function were similar between the two cohorts. First-year costs were significantly higher in the "late discharge group" (p < 0.001), with a median excess cost (Δ) of EUR 4515.76/patient. Factors influencing first-year costs post-KT were LOS for KT, recipient age, and use of expanded-criteria grafts. Conclusions: The ERAS approach is safe in KT recipients with DGF and allows for economic savings, while its implementation does not cause worse clinical outcomes in recipients.

Prospective randomised comparison of rubber band ligation (RBL) and combined hemorrhoidal radiocoagulation (CHR)

BACKGROUND

In this prospective randomized study we compared two groups of patients with grade II hemorrhoids treated with standard Rubber Band Ligation (RBL) and Combined Hemorrhoidal Radiocoagulation (CHR), respectively.

METHODS

Out of 90 patients initially randomized, a total of 75 patients regularly returned to visit controls at least for 6 months of follow-up. Consequently, two groups of patients were considered: Group A, represented by 36 individuals treated with RBL, and Group B, consisting of 39 patients treated with CHR. In this study primary endpoints were determined as evaluation of the grade of pain felt immediately after the procedure and at the first evacuation (score from 1 to 10), bleeding, patient's satisfaction after 15 days and after 6 months from the treatment (score from 1 to 10), appearance of failures.

RESULTS

Comparing two techniques, the mean pain score reported immediately after the procedure was 2.08 +/- 1.1 for Group A and 2.13 +/- 1.26 or Group B. At the first evacuation, the mean pain score for Group A and for Group B was 2.69 +/- 1.12 vs. 2.38 +/- 1.18, respectively. The satisfaction score during the first 15 days from the procedure was 6.61 +/- 2.35 for patients treated with RBL and 6.72 +/- 2.28 for patients who received CHR, while the mean score on overall satisfaction after 6 months was 7.11 +/- 2.11 (Group A) vs. 7.31 +/- 2.04 (Group B). At 6 months of follow-up, we observed remission of symptoms in 25 patients in Group A (69.4%) and 31 patients in Group B (79.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

Satisfactory results were reported in both groups of patients after different treatments, which confirm the validity and efficacy of the two techniques used in this study. At least all patients reported positive results in terms of immediate and long-term comfort after both procedures. CHR showed better results than standard RBL, but further studies are required to evaluate the validity of these methods.

Deceased donor liver utilisation and assessment: Consensus guidelines from the European Liver and Intestine Transplant Association

Over the past two decades, the application of machine perfusion (MP) in human liver transplantation has moved from the realm of clinical exploration to routine clinical practice. Both in situ and ex situ perfusion strategies are feasible, safe, and may offer improvements in relevant post-transplant outcomes. An important utility of these strategies is the ability to transplant grafts traditionally considered too risky to transplant using conventional cold storage alone. While dynamic assessment and ultimately transplantation of such livers is an important goal for the international liver transplant community, its clinical application is inconsistent. To this end, ELITA (the European Liver and Intestine Transplant Association) gathered a panel of experts to create consensus guidelines regarding selection, approach, and criteria for deceased donor liver assessment in the MP era. An eight-member steering committee (SC) convened a panel of 44 professionals working in 14 countries in Europe and North America. The SC identified topics related to liver utilisation and assessment for transplantation. For each topic, subtopics were created to answer specific clinical questions. A systematic literature review was performed, and the panel graded relevant evidence. The SC drafted initial statements addressing each clinical question. Statements were presented at the in-person Consensus Meeting on Liver Discard and Viability Assessment during the ELITA Summit held from April 19-20, 2024, in Madrid, Spain. Online voting was held to approve statements according to a modified Delphi method; statements reaching ≥85% agreement were approved. Statements addressing liver utilisation, the definition of high-risk livers, and strategies and criteria for dynamic liver assessment are presented.

Fairness and pitfalls of the Italian waiting list for elective liver transplantation: The ECALITA registry study

BACKGROUND

The challenge of transplant waiting-lists is to provide organs for all candidates while maintaining efficiency and equity.

AIMS

We investigated the probability of being transplanted or of waiting-list dropout in Italy.

METHODS

Data from 12,749 adult patients waitlisted for primary liver-transplantation from January 2012 to December 2022 were collected from the National Transplant-Registry.The cohort was divided into Eras:1 (2012-2014);2 (2015-2018);and 3 (2019-2022).

RESULTS

The one-year probability of undergoing transplant increased (67.6 % in Era 1vs73.8 % in Era 3,p < 0001) with a complementary 46 % decrease in waiting-list failures. Patients with hepatocellular-carcinoma were transplanted more often than cirrhotics[at model for end-stage liver-disease (MELD)-15:HR = 1.28,95 %CI:1.21-1.35;at MELD-25:HR = 1.04,95 %CI:0.92-1.19) and those with other indications (at MELD-15:HR = 1.27,95 %CI:1.11-1.46) across all eras. Candidates with Hepatitis-B-virus (HBV)related disease had a greater probability of transplant than those with Hepatitis-C virus-related (HR = 1.13,95 %CI:1.07-1.20), alcohol-related (HR = 1.13,95 %CI:1.05-1.21), and metabolic-related (HR = 1.18,95 %CI:1.09-1.28)disease. Waiting-list failures increased by 27 % every 5 MELD-points and by 14 % for every 5-year increase in recipient-age and decreased by 10 % with each 10-cm increase in stature. Blood-group O patients showed the highest probability of waiting-list failure (HR = 1.28,95 %CI:1.15-1.43).

CONCLUSIONS

Liver-transplantation waiting-list success-rates have significantly improved in Italy, with patients with hepatocellular-carcinoma and/or HBV-related diseases being favored. High MELD-score, old-age, short-stature, and blood-group O were significant risk-factors for waiting-list failure. Efforts to improve organ-allocation and prioritization-policies are underway.

Minimally invasive hepatopancreatic and biliary surgery in children: a large centre experience and review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for hepatopancreatic and biliary (HPB) diseases has been widely used in adults, while in children, its application is limited due to its complexity. Herein, we report the experience of MIS for paediatric HPB diseases and literature review.

METHODS

All children (≤18 years-old) undergoing major HPB operations by MIS during January 2017-June 2020 in our institution were prospectively enrolled.

RESULTS

Out of 139 children operated on for HPB diseases with MIS, 26 (18.7%) patients (age: 11 (1-17) years-old; weight: 41.9 (10.7-75.5) kg) underwent major HPB surgery, including 11 pancreatic resections and 15 liver resections, all performed by a full-laparoscopic-technique. Four (15.3%) surgeries were electively converted to an open-technique for safer operative management. None required a blood transfusion. The median hospital admission was 6 days. Post-operatively, all patients had early mobilization and good recovery. Two (7.7%) patients experienced post-operative complications requiring radiological intervention. Oncological radical resection (R0) was achieved in all tumours, and after 2 years, all children were free of tumour recurrence.

CONCLUSION

MIS for HPB surgery is safe and feasible in children, with less surgical trauma, short hospital-stay and better aesthetic results. An adequate learning curve in specialized centres is essential for good outcomes.

What Is the Role of Minimally Invasive Liver Surgery in Treating Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma on Cirrhosis?

Minimally invasive liver surgery (MILS) has been slowly introduced in the past two decades and today represents a major weapon in the fight against HCC, for several reasons. This narrative review conveys the major emerging concepts in the field. The rise in metabolic-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD)-related HCC means that patients with significant cardiovascular risk will benefit more profoundly from MILS. The advent of efficacious therapy is leading to conversion from non-resectable to resectable cases, and therefore more patients will be able to undergo MILS. In fact, resection outcomes with MILS are superior compared to open surgery both in the short and long term. Furthermore, indications to surgery may be further expanded by its use in Child B7 patients and by the use of laparoscopic ablation, a curative technique, instead of trans-arterial approaches in cases not amenable to radiofrequency. Therefore, in a promising new approach, multi-parametric treatment hierarchy, MILS is hierarchically superior to open surgery and comes second only to liver transplantation.

Health economics aspects of kidney transplantation in Sicily: a benchmark analysis on activity and estimated savings

BACKGROUND

International and national registries consistently report substantial differences in kidney transplant (KT) activity despite demonstrable clinical and financial benefits. The study aims to estimate the financial resources gained by KT and produce a benchmark analysis that would inform adequate strategies for the growth of the service.

METHODS

We analyzed the KT activity in our region between 2017 and 2019. The benchmark analysis was conducted with programs identified from national and international registries. The estimate of financial resources was obtained by applying the kidney transplant coefficient of value; subsequently, we compared the different activity levels and savings generated by the three KT programs.

FINDINGS

The KT activity in the region progressively declined in the study years, producing a parallel reduction of the estimated savings. Such savings were substantially inferior when compared to those generated by benchmark programs (range €18-22 million less).

INTERPRETATION

The factors influencing the reduced KT activity in the study period with the related "foregone savings" are multiple, as well as interdependent. Organ donation, access to the transplant waiting list, and KT from living donors appear to be the most prominent determinants of the observed different levels of activities. International experience suggests that a comprehensive strategy in the form of a "task force" may successfully address the critical areas of the service reversing the observed trend. The financial impact of a progressively reduced KT activity may be as critical as its clinical implications, jeopardizing the actual sustainability of services for patients with end-stage kidney disease.

Ambulatory therapy with combined hemorrhoidal radiocoagulation

BACKGROUND

This is a prospective randomized study to analyze results obtained in two groups of patients affected of grade II hemorrhoids and treated with Radiofrequency Coagulation (RFC) or Combined Hemorrhoidal Radiocoagulation (CHR).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study comprehended 30 patients of which 27 had at least 6 months of follow-up. Two groups of patients were considered: group A, represented by 12 individuals treated with RFC, and group B, consisting of 15 patients treated with CHR. Our purpose was to determine: grade of pain felt immediately after procedure and at first evacuation (score from 1 to 10), bleeding, patient's satisfaction 15 days and 6 months after treatment (score from 1 to 10) and incidence of failures.

RESULTS

Mean pain score reported immediately after procedure was 2.08 ± 0.9 for group A and 2.40 ± 1.5 for group B (p = NS). At first evacuation, mean pain score for group A and for group B was 2.16 ± 1.1 vs 2.33 ± 1.17, respectively (p = NS). Satisfaction score during first 15 days was 6.75 ± 2.76 for patients treated with RFC and 6.08 ± 2.20 for patients who received CHR (p = NS), while mean score of overall satisfaction after 6 months was 6.33 ± 1.96 (group A) vs 7.83 ± 2.05 (group B) (p < 0.05). At 6 months of follow-up, we observed 8 patients free from pain in group A (66.7%) and 13 patients in group B (86.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

Results reported in both groups of patients confirm validity and efficacy of the two techniques used in this study, even if later in time CHR showed better results than RFC.        

Colorectal cancer in ulcerative colitis after liver transplantation for primary sclerosing cholangitis: a systematic review and pooled analysis of oncological outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) receiving liver transplantation (LT) due to primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) have higher risk of developing colorectal cancers (CRC). Aim of this systematic review was to define the patients' features, immunosuppressive management, and oncological outcomes of LT recipients with UC-PSC developing CRC.

METHODS

Searches were conducted in PubMed (MEDLINE), Cochrane Library, Web of Science for all English articles published until September 2023. Inclusion criteria were original articles including patients specifying outcomes of interest. Primary endpoints comprised incidence of CRC, disease free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS) and cancer recurrence. Secondary endpoints were patient's and tumor characteristics, graft function, immunosuppressive management and PSC recurrence. PROSPERO CRD42022369190.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies included, 88 patients were identified. Patients (mean age: 50 years) had a long history of UC (20 years), mainly with active colitis (79%), and developed tumor within the first 3 years from LT, while receiving a double or triple immunosuppressive therapy. Cumulative incidence of tumor was 5.5%. At one, two and three years, DFS was 92%, 82% and 75%, while OS was 87%, 81% and 79% respectively. Disease progression rate was 15%. After CRC surgery, 94% of patients maintained a good graft functionality, with no reported cases of PSC recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

After LT, patients with PSC and UC have an increased risk of CRC, especially in presence of long history of UC and active colitis. Surgical resection guarantees satisfactory mid-term oncological outcomes, but samples are limited, and long-term data are lacking. National and international registry are auspicial to evaluate long-term oncological outcomes and to optimize clinical management.

Surgical management of colon cancer in ulcerative colitis patients with orthotopic liver transplant for primary sclerosing cholangitis. A systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Colon cancer in ulcerative colitis patients with liver transplant (UCCOLT) due to primary sclerosing cholangitis carries significant treatment challenges. Aim of this literature search is to review management strategies and provide a framework to facilitate the decisional process in this clinical setting.

METHODS

PRISMA-compliant systematic search was followed by critical expert commentary of the results and development of a surgical management algorithm. Endpoints included surgical management, operative strategies, functional and survival outcomes. Technical and strategics aspects with particular regard to the choice of reconstruction were evaluated to tentatively develop an integrated algorithm.

RESULTS

Ten studies reporting treatment of 20 UCCOLT patients were identified after screening. Nine patients underwent proctocolectomy and end-ileostomy (PC) and eleven had restorative ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA). Reported results for perioperative outcomes, oncological outcomes, and graft loss were comparable for both procedures. There were no reports of subtotal colectomies and ileo-rectal anastomosis (IRA).

CONCLUSIONS

Literature in the field is scarce and decision-making is particularly complex. PC and IPAA have been reported with good results. Nevertheless, IRA may also be considered in UCCOLT patients in selected cases, reducing the risks of sepsis, OLT and pouch failure; furthermore, in young patients, it has the advantage of preserving fertility or sexual function. The proposed treatment algorithm may represent a valuable support in guiding surgical strategy.

Combined endovascular-surgical treatment for complex congenital intrahepatic arterioportal fistula: A case report and review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Congenital intrahepatic arterioportal fistula (IAPF) is a rare vascular malformation in infants that causes severe portal hypertension (PH) with poor prognosis if untreated. Currently, radiological embolisation is considered the first-line therapy for simple IAPF; however, it might be not resolutive for complex hepatic vascular lesions. When endovascular embolization is not sufficient to completely obliterate the IAPF, surgical intervention is needed, but it has been associated with severe morbidity and mortality in small children. Furthermore, indications are not defined.

CASE SUMMARY

We present the first case of a 6-month-old girl with trisomy 21 affected by a complex congenital IAFP, which caused severe PH, successfully treated with an endovascular-surgical hybrid procedure. The novel technique comprised a multi-step endovascular embolisation, including a superselective transarterial embolisation of the afferent vessels and a direct transhepatic embolisation of the dilated portal vein segment, combined with selective surgical ligation of the arterial branches that supply the fistula, which were too small to be embolised. The complex IAPF was also associated with severe cholestasis and intra/extrahepatic biliary tree dilatation, which was successfully treated by a temporary biliary drainage. At 24-mo follow-up, the hybrid endovascular-surgical procedure achieved complete occlusion of the complex IAPF and resolution of the PH. A comprehensive review of the literature on congenital IAPF management, focussed on alternative treatment strategies, is also reported.

CONCLUSION

The combined radiological-surgical approach is a safe and effective treatment option for complex IAPF and avoids major invasive surgery.

Current status of liver surgery for non-colorectal non-neuroendocrine liver metastases: the NON.LI.MET. Italian Society for Endoscopic Surgery and New Technologies (SICE) and Association of Italian Surgeons in Europe (ACIE) collaborative international survey

Despite the increasing trend in liver resections for non-colorectal non-neuroendocrine liver metastases (NCNNLM), the role of surgery for these liver malignancies is still debated. Registries are an essential, reliable tool for assessing epidemiology, diagnosis, and therapeutic approach in a single hub, especially when data are dispersive and inconclusive, as in our case. The dissemination of this preliminary survey would allow us to understand if the creation of an International Registry is a viable option, while still offering a snapshot on this issue, investigating clinical practices worldwide. The steering committee designed an online questionnaire with Google Forms, which consisted of 37 questions, and was open from October 5th, 2022, to November 30th, 2022. It was disseminated using social media and mailing lists of the Italian Society of Endoscopic Surgery and New Technologies (SICE), the Association of Italian Surgeons in Europe (ACIE), and the Spanish Chapter of the American College of Surgeons (ACS). Overall, 141 surgeons (approximately 18% of the total invitations sent) from 27 countries on four continents participated in the survey. Most respondents worked in general surgery units (62%), performing less than 50 liver resections/year (57%). A multidisciplinary discussion was currently performed to validate surgical indications for NCNNLM in 96% of respondents. The most commonly adopted selection criteria were liver resectability, RECIST criteria, and absence of extrahepatic disease. Primary tumors were generally of gastrointestinal (42%), breast (31%), and pancreaticobiliary origin (13%). The most common interventions were parenchymal-sparing resections (51% of respondents) of metachronous metastases with an open approach. Major post-operative complications (Clavien-Dindo > 2) occurred in up to 20% of the procedures, according to 44% of respondents. A subset analysis of data from high-volume centers (> 100 cases/year) showed lower post-operative complications and better survival. The present survey shows that NCNNLM patients are frequently treated by surgeons in low-volume hospitals for liver surgery. Selection criteria are usually based on common sense. Liver resections are performed mainly with an open approach, possibly carrying a high burden of major post-operative complications. International guidelines and a specific consensus on this field are desirable, as well as strategies for collaboration between high-volume and low-volume centers. The present study can guide the elaboration of a multi-institutional document on the optimal pathway in the management of patients with NCNNLM.

Intraductal Papillary Neoplasms of the Bile Duct: Clinical Case Insights and Literature Review

BACKGROUND

Intraductal papillary neoplasms of the bile duct (IPNB) are rare precancerous lesions with implications for the development of cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). Recognizing IPNB and managing its recurrence pose challenges in clinical practice. We present two cases. Case 1: a 60-year-old man presented with an 8 × 8 × 9 cm hepatic cyst initially suspected to be a hydatid cyst. Histology post-resection revealed an IPNB with foci of adenocarcinoma. Despite negative oncologic margins, recurrence occurred eight years later as an rT2N0 lesion. Surgical resection was performed without adjuvant chemotherapy, resulting in the patient's survival at 48 months post-surgery. Case 2: a 28-year-old female with cognitive impairment was admitted with pulmonary embolism and a liver lesion diagnosed as a simple cyst. Subsequent evaluation revealed adenocarcinoma with local metastases, extensive vascular involvement, and thrombosis. Despite aggressive management, including thrombectomy and chemotherapy, the patient's condition deteriorated, leading to hepatic failure and eventual demise.

CONCLUSION

IPNB represents a rare premalignant subtype with a propensity for progression to CCA. R0 surgical resection typically offers favorable oncological outcomes with a minimal recurrence risk. Surgical intervention for localized resectable recurrence is both safe and feasible. International registries tracking IPNB recurrence are essential for advancing understanding and optimizing diagnosis, management, and treatment strategies.