Referent Control of Side-to-Side Body-Weight Transfer During Standing and Stepping in Adults

Research suggests that locomotion may be primarily caused by shifting stable body balance from one location in the environment to another with subsequent rhythmical muscle activation by the central pattern generator (CPG), constituting a multi-level control system. All levels interact with environmental forces affected by proprioceptive and vestibular reflexes as well as vision. A similar multi-level control schema is likely used to shift body balance laterally when the body weight is rhythmically transferred from side-to-side. In order to do so, the system shifts a specific body posture in space. This body posture is referred to as the threshold or referent body posture, R, at which all muscles involved can be at rest but are activated depending on the deflection of the actual body posture, Q, from R. This concept has previously been investigated for forward and backward locomotion. The purpose of the present study was to verify if it was also applicable to locomotor tasks in other directions such as sidestepping. We predicted that during sidestepping, the actual and referent posture can transiently match each other bringing the activity of multiple muscles to a minimum. The existence of such minima was demonstrated in healthy adults performing three locomotor tasks involving shifts of the body weight from side-to-side thus further supporting the validity of the multi-level control scheme of locomotion.

Altered Anticipatory Postural Adjustments During Whole-Body Reaching in Subjects With Stroke

BACKGROUND

Coordination between arm movements and postural adjustments is crucial for reaching-while-stepping tasks involving both anticipatory postural adjustments (APAs) and compensatory movements to effectively propel the whole-body forward so that the hand can reach the target. Stroke impairs the ability to coordinate the action of multiple body segments but the underlying mechanisms are unclear. Objective. To determine the effects of stroke on reaching performance and APAs during whole-body reaching.

METHODS

We tested arm reaching in standing (stand-reach) and reaching-while-stepping (step-reach; 15 trials/condition) in individuals with chronic stroke (n = 18) and age-matched healthy subjects (n = 13). Whole-body kinematics and kinetic data were collected during the tasks. The primary outcome measure for step-reach was "gain" (g), defined as the extent to which the hip displacement contributing to hand motion was neutralized by appropriate changes in upper limb movements (g = 1 indicates complete compensation) and APAs measured as spatio-temporal profiles of the center-of-pressure shifts preceding stepping.

RESULTS

Individuals with stroke had lower gains and altered APAs compared to healthy controls. In addition, step onset was delayed, and the timing of endpoint, trunk, and foot movement offset was prolonged during step-reach compared to healthy controls. Those with milder sensorimotor impairment and better balance function had higher gains. Altered APAs were also related to reduced balance function.

CONCLUSIONS

Altered APAs and prolonged movement offset in stroke may lead to a greater reliance on compensatory arm movements. Altered APAs in individuals with stroke may be associated with a reduced shift of referent body configuration during the movement.

Identifying Referent Control Variables Underlying Goal-Directed Arm Movements

The referent control theory (RCT) for action and perception is an advanced formulation of the equilibrium-point hypothesis. The RCT suggests that rather than directly specifying the desired motor outcome, the nervous system controls action and perception indirectly by setting the values of parameters of physical and physiological laws. This is done independently of values of kinematic and kinetic variables including electromyographic patterns describing the motor outcome. One such parameter-the threshold muscle length, λ, at which motoneurons of a given muscle begin to be recruited, has been identified experimentally. In RCT, a similar parameter, the referent arm position, R, has been defined for multiple arm muscles as the threshold arm position at which arm muscles can be quiescent but activated depending on the deflection of the actual arm position, Q, from R. Changes in R result in reciprocal changes in the activity of opposing muscle groups. We advanced the explanatory power of RCT by combining the usual biomechanical descriptions of motor actions with the identification of the timing of R underlying arm movements made with reversals in three directions and to three different extents. We found that in all movements, periods of minimization of the activity of multiple muscles could be identified at ∼61%-86% of the reaching extent in each direction. These electromyographic minimization periods reflect the spatial coordinates at which the R and Q overlap during the production of movements with reversals. The findings support the concept of the production of arm movement by shifting R.

The use of enhanced intrinsic feedback for motor learning in stroke survivors: Clinical trial protocol

BACKGROUND

Stroke can lead to lasting sensorimotor deficits of the upper limb (UL) persisting into the chronic phase despite intensive rehabilitation. A major impairment of reaching after stroke is a decreased range of active elbow extension, which in turn leads to the use of compensatory movements. Retraining movement patterns relies on cognition and motor learning principles. Implicit learning may lead to better outcomes than explicit learning. Error augmentation (EA) is a feedback modality based on implicit learning resulting in improved precision and speed of UL reaching movements in people with stroke. However, accompanying changes in UL joint movement patterns have not been investigated. The objective of this study is to determine the capacity for implicit motor learning in people with chronic stroke and how this capacity is affected by post-stroke cognitive impairments.

METHODS

Fifty-two subjects who have chronic stroke will practice reaching movements 3×/wk. for 9 wk. in a virtual reality environment. Participants will be randomly allocated to 1 of 2 groups to train with or without EA feedback. Outcome measures (pre-, post- and follow-up) will be: endpoint precision, speed, smoothness, and straightness and joint (UL and trunk) kinematics during a functional reaching task. The degree of cognitive impairment, lesion profile, and integrity of descending white matter tracts will be related to training outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The results will inform us which patients can best benefit from training programs that rely on motor learning and utilize enhanced feedback.

TRIAL STATUS

Ethical approval for this study was finalized in May 2022. Recruitment and data collection is actively in progress and is planned to finish in 2026. Data analysis and evaluation will occur subsequently, and the final results will be published.

Reaction of human walking to transient block of vision: analysis in the context of indirect, referent control of motor actions

Human locomotion may result from monotonic shifts in the referent position, R, of the body in the environment. R is also the spatial threshold at which muscles can be quiescent but are activated depending on the deflection of the current body configuration Q from R. Shifts in R are presumably accomplished with the participation of proprioceptive and visual feedback and responsible for transferring stable body balance (equilibrium) from one place in the environment to another, resulting in rhythmic activity of multiple muscles by a central pattern generator (CPG). We tested predictions of this two-level control scheme. In particular, in response to a transient block of vision during locomotion, the system can temporarily slow shifts in R. As a result, the phase of rhythmical movements of all four limbs will be changed for some time, even though the rhythm and other characteristics of locomotion will be fully restored after perturbation, a phenomenon called long-lasting phase resetting. Another prediction of the control scheme is that the activity of multiple muscles of each leg can be minimized reciprocally at specific phases of the gait cycle both in the presence and absence of vision. Speed of locomotion is related to the rate of shifts in the referent body position in the environment. Results confirmed that human locomotion is likely guided by feedforward shifts in the referent body location, with subsequent changes in the activity of multiple muscles by the CPG. Neural structures responsible for shifts in the referent body configuration causing locomotion are suggested.

Shifts in the eye-centered frame of reference may underlie saccades, visual perception, and eye-hand coordination

Conventional, computational theories limit the understanding of how action and perception are controlled. In an alternative scheme, the nervous system controls the values of physical and neurophysiological parameters that pre-determine the choice of the spatial frames of reference (FRs) for action and perception. For example, all possible eye positions, Q, can be considered as comprising a spatial FR in which extraocular muscles (EOMs) stabilize gaze directions. The origin or referent point of this FR is a specific, threshold eye position, R, at which EOMs can be quiescent but activated depending on the difference between Q and R. Starting before eye motion, shifts in R cause displacement of the FR and resetting of the stable equilibrium position to which the eyes are forced to move. Rather than corollary discharge, the depiction of visual images integrated across the entire retina in the shifted spatial FR is responsible for remapping of visual receptive fields and visual constancy. These suggestions are illustrated in computer models of saccades in the referent control framework in humans and monkeys. The existence of three types of visual RF remapping during saccades is suggested. Properly scaled, shifts in the R underlying a saccade are transmitted to motoneurons of arm muscles to guide reach-to-grasp motion in the same, eye-centered FR. Some predictions of the proposed control scheme have been verified and new tests are suggested. The scheme is applicable to several eye-hand coordination deficits including micrography in Parkinson's disease and explains why vision helps deafferented subjects diminish movement deficits.

Central pattern generator and human locomotion in the context of referent control of motor actions

Unperturbed human locomotion presumably results from feedforward shifts in stable body equilibrium in the environment, thus avoiding falling and subsequent catching considered in alternative theories of locomotion. Such shifts are achieved by relocation of the referent body configuration at which multiple muscle recruitment begins. Rather than being directly specified by a central pattern generator, multiple muscles are activated depending on the extent to which the body is deflected from the referent, threshold body configuration, as confirmed in previous studies. Based on the referent control theory of action and perception, solutions to classical problems in motor control are offered, including the previously unresolved problem of the integration of central and reflex influences on motoneurons and the problem of how posture and movement are related. The speed of locomotion depends on the rate of shifts in the referent body configuration. The transition from walking to running results from increasing the rate of referent shifts. It is emphasised that there is a certain hierarchy between reciprocal and co-activation of agonist and antagonist muscles during locomotion and other motor actions, which is also essential for the understanding of how locomotor speed is regulated. The analysis opens a new avenue in neurophysiological approaches to human locomotion with clinical implications.

Mild Stroke Affects Pointing Movements Made in Different Frames of Reference

Background

Motor performance is a complex process controlled in task-specific spatial frames of reference (FRs). Movements can be made within the framework of the body (egocentric FR) or external space (exocentric FR). People with stroke have impaired reaching, which may be related to deficits in movement production in different FRs.

Objective

To characterize rapid motor responses to changes in the number of degrees of freedom for movements made in different FRs and their relationship with sensorimotor and cognitive impairment in individuals with mild chronic stroke.

Methods

Healthy and poststroke individuals moved their hand along the contralateral forearm (egocentric task) and between targets in the peripersonal space (exocentric task) without vision while flexing the trunk. Trunk movement was blocked in randomized trials.

Results

For the egocentric task, controls produced the same endpoint trajectories in both conditions (free- and blocked-trunk) by preserving similar shoulder-elbow interjoint coordination (IJC). However, endpoint trajectories were dissimilar because of altered IJC in stroke. For the exocentric task, controls produced the same endpoint trajectories when the trunk was free or blocked by rapidly changing the IJC, whereas this was not the case in stroke. Deficits in exocentric movement after stroke were related to cognitive but not sensorimotor impairment.

Conclusions

Individuals with mild stroke have deficits rapidly responding to changing conditions for complex reaching tasks. This may be related to cognitive deficits and limitations in the regulation of tonic stretch reflex thresholds. Such deficits should be considered in rehabilitation programs encouraging the reintegration of the affected arm into activities of daily living.

Participation of ipsilateral cortical descending influences in bimanual wrist movements in humans

There are contralateral and less studied ipsilateral (i), indirect cortical descending projections to motoneurons (MNs). We compared ipsilateral cortical descending influences on MNs of wrist flexors by applying transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over the right primary motor cortex at actively maintained flexion and extension wrist positions in uni- and bimanual tasks in right-handed participants (n = 23). The iTMS response includes a short latency (~ 25 ms) motor evoked potential (iMEP), a silent period (iSP) and a long latency (~ 60 ms) facilitation called rebound (iRB). We also investigated whether the interaction between the two hands while holding an object in a bimanual task involves ipsilateral cortical descending influences. In the unimanual task, iTMS responses in the right wrist flexors were unaffected by changes in wrist position. In the bimanual task with an object, iMEPs in the right wrist flexors were larger when the ipsilateral wrist was in flexion compared to extension. Without the object, only iRB were larger when the ipsilateral wrist was extended. Thus, ipsilateral cortical descending influences on MNs were modulated only in bimanual tasks and depended on how the two hands interacted. It is concluded that the left and right cortices cooperate in bimanual tasks involving holding an object with both hands, with possible involvement of oligo- and poly-synaptic, as well as transcallosal projections to MNs. The possible involvement of spinal and transcortical stretch and cutaneous reflexes in bimanual tasks when holding an object is discussed in the context of the well-established notion that indirect, referent control underlies motor actions.

Eye and head movements and vestibulo-ocular reflex in the context of indirect, referent control of motor actions

Conventional explanations of the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) and eye and head movements are revisited by considering two alternative frameworks addressing the question of how the brain controls motor actions. Traditionally, biomechanical and/or computational frameworks reflect the views of several prominent scholars of the past, including Helmholtz and von Holst, who assumed that the brain directly specifies the desired motor outcome and uses efference copy to influence perception. However, empirical studies resulting in the theory of referent control of action and perception (an extension of the equilibrium-point hypothesis) revealed that direct specification of motor outcome is inconsistent with nonlinear properties of motoneurons and with the physical principle that the brain can control motor actions only indirectly, by changing or maintaining the values of neurophysiological parameters that influence, but can remain independent of, biomechanical variables. Some parameters are used to shift the origin (referent) points of spatial frames of reference (FRs) or system of coordinates in which motor actions emerge without being predetermined. Parameters are adjusted until the emergent motor actions meet the task demands. Several physiological parameters and spatial FRs have been identified, supporting the notion of indirect, referent control of movements. Instead of integration of velocity-dependent signals, position-dimensional referent signals underlying head motion can likely be transmitted to motoneurons of extraocular muscles. This would produce compensatory eye movement preventing shifts in gaze during head rotation, even after bilateral destruction of the labyrinths. The referent control framework symbolizes a shift in the paradigm for the understanding of VOR and eye and head movement production.

Stability of reaching during standing in stroke

Reaching from standing requires simultaneous adjustments of focal and postural task elements. We investigated the ability of people with stroke to stabilize the endpoint trajectory while maintaining balance during standing reaches. Nineteen stroke and 11 age-equivalent healthy subjects reached toward a target (n = 30 trials) located beyond arm length from standing. Endpoint and center-of-mass (COM) trajectories were analyzed using the uncontrolled manifold (UCM) approach, with segment angles as elemental variables. A synergy index (SI) represented the normalized difference between segment angle combinations, leading to endpoint or COM trajectory stabilization (V_UCM) and lack of stabilization (in an orthogonal space; V_ORT). A higher SI reflects greater stability. In both groups, the endpoint SI (SI_END) decreased in parallel with endpoint velocity and returned close to baseline at the end of the movement. The range of SI_END was significantly greater in stroke (median: 0.87; QR:0.54) compared with healthy subjects (median: 0.58; QR: 0.33; P = 0.009). In both groups, the lowest SI_END occurred at the endpoint peak velocity, whereas the minimal SI_END of the stroke group (median: 0.51; QR:0.41) was lower than the healthy group (median: 0.25; QR: 0.50; P = 0.033). The COM SI (SI_COM) remained stable in both groups (~0.8). The maintenance of a high SI_COM despite a large reduction of SI_END in stroke subjects suggests that kinematic redundancy was effectively used to stabilize the COM position, but less so for endpoint position stabilization. Both focal and postural task elements should be considered when analyzing whole body reaching deficits in patients with stroke.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Reaching from standing requires simultaneous adjustments of endpoint and center-of-mass (COM) positions. We used uncontrolled manifold analysis to investigate the impact of stroke on the ability to use kinematic redundancy in this task. Our results showed that COM position was stabilized, whereas endpoint trajectory was more variable in stroke than healthy subjects. Enhancing the capacity to meet multiple task goals may be beneficial for motor recovery after stroke.

Development of vertical and forward jumping skills in typically developing children in the context of referent control of motor actions

The empirically based referent control theory of motor actions provides a new framework for understanding locomotor maturation. Mature movement patterns of referent control are characterized by periods of minimization of activity across multiple muscles (global electromyographic [EMG] minima) resulting from transient matching between actual and referent body configurations. We identified whether locomotor maturation in young children was associated with (a) development of referent control and (b) children's frequency of participation in everyday activities evaluated by parents. Kinematics and EMG activity were recorded from typically developing children (n = 15, 3-5 years) and young adults (n = 10, 18-25 years) while walking, vertical or forward jumping. Presence and location of global EMG minima in movement cycles, slopes of ankle vertical/sagittal displacements, and shoulder displacement ratios were evaluated. Children had fewer global EMG minima compared to adults during specific phases of vertical and forward jumps. Ankle displacement profiles for walking and jumping forward were related to each other in adults, whereas those for walking and vertical jumping were related in children. Higher frequency of participation was significantly correlated with more mature jumping patterns in children. A decrease in the number of global EMG minima and changes in ankle movement patterns could be indicators of locomotor immaturity in typically developing children.

Indirect, referent control of motor actions underlies directional tuning of neurons

Many neurons of the primary motor cortex (M1) are maximally sensitive to "preferred" hand movement directions and generate progressively less activity with movements away from these directions. M1 activity also correlates with other biomechanical variables. These findings are predominantly interpreted in a framework in which the brain preprograms and directly specifies the desired motor outcome. This approach is inconsistent with the empirically derived equilibrium-point hypothesis, in which the brain can control motor actions only indirectly, by changing neurophysiological parameters that may influence, but remain independent of, biomechanical variables. The controversy is resolved on the basis of experimental findings and theoretical analysis of how sensory and central influences are integrated in the presence of the fundamental nonlinearity of neurons: electrical thresholds. In the presence of sensory inputs, electrical thresholds are converted into spatial thresholds that predetermine the position of the body segments at which muscles begin to be activated. Such thresholds may be considered as referent points of respective spatial frames of reference (FRs) in which neurons, including motoneurons, are centrally predetermined to work. By shifting the referent points of respective FRs, the brain elicits intentional actions. Pure involuntary reactions to perturbations are accomplished in motionless FRs. Neurons are primarily sensitive to shifts in referent directions, i.e., shifts in spatial FRs, whereas emergent neural activity may or may not correlate with different biomechanical variables depending on the motor task and external conditions. Indirect, referent control of posture and movement symbolizes a departure from conventional views based on direct preprogramming of the motor outcome.

Vestibular and corticospinal control of human body orientation in the gravitational field

Body orientation with respect to the direction of gravity changes when we lean forward from upright standing. We tested the hypothesis that during upright standing, the nervous system specifies the referent body orientation that defines spatial thresholds for activation of multiple muscles across the body. To intentionally lean the body forward, the system is postulated to transfer balance and stability to the leaned position by monotonically tilting the referent orientation, thus increasing the activation thresholds of ankle extensors and decreasing their activity. Consequently, the unbalanced gravitational torque would start to lean the body forward. With restretching, ankle extensors would be reactivated and generate increasing electromyographic (EMG) activity until the enhanced gravitational torque would be balanced at a new posture. As predicted, vestibular influences on motoneurons of ankle extensors evaluated by galvanic vestibular stimulation were smaller in the leaned compared with the upright position, despite higher tonic EMG activity. Defacilitation of vestibular influences was also observed during forward leaning when the EMG levels in the upright and leaned position were equalized by compensating the gravitational torque with a load. The vestibular system is involved in the active control of body orientation without directly specifying the motor outcome. Corticospinal influences originating from the primary motor cortex evaluated by transcranial magnetic stimulation remained similar at the two body postures. Thus, in contrast to the vestibular system, the corticospinal system maintains a similar descending facilitation of motoneurons of leg muscles at different body orientations. The study advances the understanding of how body orientation is controlled. NEW & NOTEWORTHY The brain changes the referent body orientation with respect to gravity to lean the body forward. Physiologically, this is achieved by shifts in spatial thresholds for activation of ankle muscles, which involves the vestibular system. Results advance the understanding of how the brain controls body orientation in the gravitational field. The study also extends previous evidence of empirical control of motor function, i.e., without the reliance on model-based computations and direct specification of motor outcome.

Spasticity may obscure motor learning ability after stroke

Previous motor learning studies based on adapting movements of the hemiparetic arm in stroke subjects have not accounted for spasticity occurring in specific joint ranges (spasticity zones), resulting in equivocal conclusions about learning capacity. We compared the ability of participants with stroke to rapidly adapt elbow extension movements to changing external load conditions outside and inside spasticity zones. Participants with stroke ( n = 12, aged 57.8 ± 9.6 yr) and healthy age-matched controls ( n = 8, 63.5 ± 9.1 yr) made rapid 40°-50° horizontal elbow extension movements from an initial (3°) to a final (6°) target. Sixteen blocks (6-10 trials/block) consisting of alternating loaded (30% maximal voluntary contraction) and nonloaded trials were made in one (controls) or two sessions (stroke; 1 wk apart). For the stroke group, the tonic stretch reflex threshold angle at which elbow flexors began to be activated during passive elbow extension was used to identify the beginning of the spasticity zone. The task was repeated in joint ranges that did or did not include the spasticity zone. Error correction strategies were identified by the angular positions before correction and compared between groups and sessions. Changes in load condition from no load to load and vice versa resulted in undershoot and overshoot errors, respectively. Stroke subjects corrected errors in 1-4 trials compared with 1-2 trials in controls. When movements did not include the spasticity zone, there was an immediate decrease in the number of trials needed to restore accuracy, suggesting that the capacity to learn may be preserved after stroke but masked by the presence of spasticity. NEW & NOTEWORTHY When arm movements were made outside, instead of inside, the range affected by spasticity, there was an immediate decrease in the number of trials needed to restore accuracy in response to a change in the external load. This suggests that motor learning processes may be preserved in patients with stroke but masked by the presence of spasticity in specific joint ranges. This has important implications for designing rehabilitation interventions predicated on motor learning principles.

Threshold position control of anticipation in humans: a possible role of corticospinal influences

KEY POINTS

Sudden unloading of preloaded wrist muscles elicits motion to a new wrist position. Such motion is prevented if subjects unload muscles using the contralateral arm (self-unloading). Corticospinal influences originated from the primary motor cortex maintain tonic influences on motoneurons of wrist muscles before sudden unloading but modify these influences prior to the onset and until the end of self-unloading. Results are interpreted based on the previous finding that intentional actions are caused by central, particularly corticospinal, shifts in the spatial thresholds at which wrist motoneurons are activated, thus predetermining the attractor point at which the neuromuscular periphery achieves mechanical balance with environment forces. By maintaining or shifting the thresholds, descending systems let body segments go to the equilibrium position in the respective unloading tasks without the pre-programming of kinematics or muscle activation patterns. The study advances the understanding of how motor actions in general, and anticipation in particular, are controlled.

ABSTRACT

The role of corticospinal (CS) pathways in anticipatory motor actions was evaluated using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the primary motor cortex projecting to motoneurons (MNs) of wrist muscles. Preloaded wrist flexors were suddenly unloaded by the experimenter or by the subject using the other hand (self-unloading). After sudden unloading, the wrist joint involuntarily flexed to a new position. In contrast, during self-unloading the wrist remained almost motionless, implying that an anticipatory postural adjustment occurred. In the self-unloading task, anticipation was manifested by a decrease in descending facilitation of pre-activated flexor MNs starting ∼72 ms before changes in the background EMG activity. Descending facilitation of extensor MNs began to increase ∼61 ms later. Conversely, these influences remained unchanged before sudden unloading, implying the absence of anticipation. We also tested TMS responses during EMG silent periods produced by brief muscle shortening, transiently resulting in similar EMG levels before the onset and after the end of self-unloading. We found reduced descending facilitation of flexor MNs after self-unloading. To explain why the wrist excursion was minimized in self-unloading due to these changes in descending influences, we relied on previous demonstrations that descending systems pre-set the threshold positions of body segments at which muscles begin to be activated, thus predetermining the equilibrium point to which the system is attracted. Based on this notion, a more consistent explanation of the kinematic, EMG and descending patterns in the two types of unloading is proposed compared to the alternative notion of direct pre-programming of kinematic and/or EMG patterns.

Referent control and motor equivalence of reaching from standing

Motor actions may result from central changes in the referent body configuration, defined as the body posture at which muscles begin to be activated or deactivated. The actual body configuration deviates from the referent configuration, particularly because of body inertia and environmental forces. Within these constraints, the system tends to minimize the difference between these configurations. For pointing movement, this strategy can be expressed as the tendency to minimize the difference between the referent trajectory (R_T) and actual trajectory (Q_T) of the effector (hand). This process may underlie motor equivalent behavior that maintains the pointing trajectory regardless of the number of body segments involved. We tested the hypothesis that the minimization process is used to produce pointing in standing subjects. With eyes closed, 10 subjects reached from a standing position to a remembered target located beyond arm length. In randomly chosen trials, hip flexion was unexpectedly prevented, forcing subjects to take a step during pointing to prevent falling. The task was repeated when subjects were instructed to intentionally take a step during pointing. In most cases, reaching accuracy and trajectory curvature were preserved due to adaptive condition-specific changes in interjoint coordination. Results suggest that referent control and the minimization process associated with it may underlie motor equivalence in pointing.

NEW & NOTEWORTHY

Motor actions may result from minimization of the deflection of the actual body configuration from the centrally specified referent body configuration, in the limits of neuromuscular and environmental constraints. The minimization process may maintain reaching trajectory and accuracy regardless of the number of body segments involved (motor equivalence), as confirmed in this study of reaching from standing in young healthy individuals. Results suggest that the referent control process may underlie motor equivalence in reaching.

Spatial control of reflexes, posture and movement in normal conditions and after neurological lesions

Control of reflexes is usually associated with central modulation of their sensitivity (gain) or phase-dependent inhibition and facilitation of their influences on motoneurons (reflex gating). Accumulated empirical findings show that the gain modulation and reflex gating are secondary, emergent properties of central control of spatial thresholds at which reflexes become functional. In this way, the system pre-determines, in a feedforward and task-specific way, where, in a spatial domain or a frame of reference, muscles are allowed to work without directly prescribing EMG activity and forces. This control strategy is illustrated by considering reflex adaptation to repeated muscle stretches in healthy subjects, a process associated with implicit learning and generalization. It has also been shown that spasticity, rigidity, weakness and other neurological motor deficits may have a common source - limitations in the range of spatial threshold control elicited by neural lesions.

Active sensing without efference copy: referent control of perception

Although action and perception are different behaviors, they are likely to be interrelated, as implied by the notions of perception-action coupling and active sensing. Traditionally, it has been assumed that the nervous system directly preprograms motor commands required for actions and uses a copy of them called efference copy (EC) to also influence our senses. This review offers a critical analysis of the EC concept by identifying its limitations. An alternative to the EC concept is based on the experimentally confirmed notion that sensory signals from receptors are perceived relative to referent signals specified by the brain. These referents also underlie the control of motor actions by predetermining where, in the spatial domain, muscles can work without preprogramming how they should work in terms of motor commands or EC. This approach helps solve several problems of action and explain several sensory experiences, including position sense and the sense that the world remains stationary despite changes in its retinal image during eye or body motion (visual space constancy). The phantom limb phenomenon and other kinesthetic illusions are also explained within this framework.

Implicit learning and generalization of stretch response modulation in humans

Adaptation of neural responses to repeated muscle stretching likely represents implicit learning to minimize muscle resistance to perturbations. To test this hypothesis, the forearm was placed on a horizontal manipulandum. Elbow flexors or extensors compensated an external load and were stretched by 20° or 70° rotations. Participants were instructed not to intervene by intentionally modifying the muscle resistance elicited by stretching. In addition to phasic stretch reflexes (SRs), muscle stretching was associated with inhibitory periods (IPs) in the ongoing muscle activity starting at minimal latencies of ∼35 ms. The SR amplitude decreased dramatically across 5-12 trials and was not restored after a resting period of 3-5 min, despite the increase in stretch amplitude from 20° to 70°, but IPs remained present. When SRs were suppressed, stretching of originally nonstretched, antagonist muscles initiated after the rest period showed immediate SR suppression while IPs remained present in the first and subsequent trials. Adaptation to muscle stretching thus includes features characteristic of implicit learning such as memory consolidation and generalization. Adaptation may be achieved by central shifts in the threshold positions at which muscles begin to be activated. Shifts are thought to be prepared in advance and triggered with stretch onset. Threshold position resetting provides a comprehensive explanation of the results in the broader context of the control of posture, movement, and motor learning in the healthy and damaged nervous system.

The Relationship Between Postural and Movement Stability

Postural stabilization is provided by stretch reflexes, intermuscular reflexes, and intrinsic muscle properties. Taken together, these posture-stabilizing mechanisms resist deflections from the posture at which balance of muscle and external forces is maintained. Empirical findings suggest that for each muscle, these mechanisms become functional at a specific, spatial threshold-the muscle length or respective joint angle at which motor units begin to be recruited. Empirical data suggest that spinal and supraspinal centers can shift the spatial thresholds for a group of muscles that stabilized the initial posture. As a consequence, the same stabilizing mechanisms, instead of resisting motion from the initial posture, drive the body to another stable posture. In other words by shifting spatial thresholds, the nervous system converts movement resisting to movement-producing mechanisms. It is illustrated that, contrary to conventional view, this control strategy allows the system to transfer body balance to produce locomotion and other actions without loosing stability at any point of them. It also helps orient posture and movement with the direction of gravity. It is concluded that postural and movement stability is provided by a common mechanism.

Arm-trunk coordination for beyond-the-reach movements in adults with stroke

BACKGROUND

By involving additional degrees of freedom, the nervous system may preserve hand trajectories when making pointing movements with or without trunk displacement. Previous studies indicate that the potential contribution of trunk movement to hand displacement for movements made within arm reach is neutralized by appropriate compensatory shoulder and elbow rotations. For beyond-the-reach movements, compensatory coordination is attenuated after the hand peak velocity, allowing trunk movement to contribute to hand displacement.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate if the timing and spatial coordination of arm and trunk movements during beyond-the-reach movements is preserved in stroke.

METHODS

Eleven healthy control subjects and 11 individuals with mild-to-moderate chronic unilateral hemiparesis participated. Arm and trunk kinematics during 60 target reaches to an ipsilaterally placed target were recorded. In 30% of randomly chosen trials, trunk movement was unexpectedly prevented (blocked-trunk trials) by an electromagnetic device, resulting in divergence of the hand trajectory from that in free-trunk trials. Hand trajectories and elbow-shoulder interjoint coordination were compared between trials.

RESULTS

In stroke participants, hand trajectory divergence occurred at a shorter movement extent and interjoint coordination patterns diverged at a relatively greater distance compared to controls. Thus, arm movements in stroke participants only partially compensated trunk displacement resulting in the trunk movement contributing to arm movement earlier and to a larger extent during reaching.

CONCLUSION

Individuals with mild-to-moderate stroke have deficits in timing and spatial coordination of arm and trunk movements during different parts of a reaching movement. This deficit may be targeted in therapy to improve upper limb function.

Arm-trunk coordination as a measure of vestibulospinal efficiency

When arm and trunk segments are involved in reaching for objects within arm's reach, vestibulospinal pathways compensate for trunk motion influence on arm movement. This compensatory arm-trunk synergy is characterised by a gain coefficient of 0 to 1. Vestibular patients have less efficient arm-trunk synergies and lower gains. To assess the clinical usefulness of the gain measure, we used a portable ultrasound-based device to characterize arm-trunk coordination deficits in vestibular patients. Arm-trunk coordination without vision was measured in a Stationary Hand Task where hand position was maintained during trunk movement, and a Reaching Task with and without trunk motion. Twenty unilateral vestibular patients and 16 controls participated. For the Stationary Hand task, patient gains ranged from g=0.94 (good compensation) to 0.31 (poor compensation) and, on average, were lower than in controls (patients: 0.67 ± 0.19; controls: 0.85 ± 0.07; p< 0.01). Gains were significantly correlated with clinical tests (Sensory Organization; r=0.62, p< 0.01, Foam Romberg Eyes Closed; r=0.65, p< 0.01). For the Reaching Task, blocking trunk movement during reaching modified hand position significantly more in patients (8.2 ± 4.3 cm) compared to controls (4.5 ± 1.7 cm, p< 0.02) and the amount of hand position deviation was correlated with the degree of vestibular loss in a sub-group (n=14) of patients. Measurement of the Stationary Task arm-trunk gain and hand deviations during the Reaching Task can help characterize sensorimotor problems in vestibular-deficient patients and track recovery following therapeutic interventions. The ultrasound-based portable device is suitable for measuring vestibulospinal deficits in arm-trunk coordination in a clinical setting.