Efficacy and Safety of Belimumab in Patients With Lupus Nephritis: Subgroup Analyses of a Phase 3 Randomized Trial in the East Asian Population

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE

Belimumab improved kidney outcomes in patients with active lupus nephritis (LN) in BLISS-LN, leading to its approval in the United States and the European Union. As data on treatment of East Asian patients with LN are limited, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of belimumab in the BLISS-LN East Asian subgroup.

STUDY DESIGN

Prespecified subgroup analysis of BLISS-LN, a phase 3, placebo-controlled, randomized 104-week trial.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

Adults with biopsy-proven, active LN were randomized (1:1) to belimumab or placebo, plus standard therapy.

INTERVENTION

Patients were administered intravenous belimumab 10mg/kg, or placebo, plus standard therapy (oral glucocorticoids and either cyclophosphamide for induction followed by azathioprine for maintenance, or mycophenolate mofetil for both induction and maintenance). At the investigator's discretion, 1-3 intravenous pulses of methylprednisolone, 500-1,000mg each, could be administered during induction.

OUTCOMES

The primary end point was primary efficacy renal response (PERR; ie, urinary protein-creatinine ratio≤0.7g/g, estimated glomerular filtration rate no more than 20% below preflare value or≥60mL/min/1.73m², and no treatment failure) at week 104. Key secondary end points included complete renal response (CRR; urinary protein-creatinine ratio<0.5g/g, estimated glomerular filtration rate no more than 10% below preflare value or≥90mL/min/1.73m², and no treatment failure) at week 104; PERR at week 52; time to kidney-related event or death; and safety.

ANALYTICAL APPROACH

PERR and CRR were analyzed using a logistic regression model, and time to a kidney-related event or death was analyzed using a Cox proportional hazards regression model.

RESULTS

142 patients from mainland China, Hong Kong, South Korea, and Taiwan were included (belimumab, n=74; placebo, n=68). At week 104, more belimumab than placebo patients achieved PERR (53% vs 37%; OR, 1.76 [95% CI, 0.88-3.51]) and CRR (35% vs 25%; OR, 1.73 [95% CI, 0.80-3.74]). At week 52, more belimumab than placebo patients achieved PERR (62% vs 37%; OR, 2.74 [95% CI, 1.33-5.64]). Belimumab reduced the risk of a kidney-related event or death compared with placebo at any time (HR, 0.37 [95% CI, 0.15-0.91]). Safety was similar across treatment groups.

LIMITATIONS

Small sample size and lack of formal significance testing.

CONCLUSIONS

Safety and efficacy profiles were consistent with BLISS-LN overall population, supporting benefits of belimumab treatment in the East Asian subgroup with LN.

FUNDING

This study was funded by GSK (GSK study no. BEL114054).

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with study number NCT01639339.

Safety and efficacy of belimumab in older adults with SLE: results of an integrated analysis of clinical trial data

OBJECTIVE

Assess the safety and efficacy of belimumab in older adults with SLE.

METHODS

This post hoc integrated analysis (GSK Study 116559) included safety data from six randomised, placebo-controlled belimumab trials (BLISS-76, BLISS-52, BLISS-SC, North East Asia study, LBSL02, EMBRACE; n=4170). The BASE study provided additional safety data (n=4003). Efficacy data were from five of the trials. Older adults (≥65 years) were compared with the overall populations of patients with SLE. Patients who had received ≥1 treatment dose were included.

RESULTS

Sixty-three older adults (1.5%) were included in the pooled safety analysis population and 156 (3.9%) in the BASE study. At baseline, older adults had lower disease activity but more organ damage than the overall populations. In the pooled safety analysis population, five (18.5%) placebo-treated and ten (27.8%) belimumab-treated older adults experienced ≥1 serious adverse event (SAE), as did 230 (17.0%) placebo-treated and 421 (15.0%) belimumab-treated patients overall. In the BASE study, nine (11.0%) placebo-treated and six (8.1%) belimumab-treated older adults experienced ≥1 SAE, as did 222 (11.1%) placebo-treated and 220 (11.0%) belimumab-treated patients overall. No clinically relevant differences in deaths and adverse events of special interest were observed between older adults and the overall populations. Older adults' SLE Responder Index response rates favoured belimumab versus placebo, consistent with the overall population.

CONCLUSION

The safety and efficacy of belimumab in older adults were generally consistent with the overall populations, suggesting belimumab is a treatment option for older patients with SLE. Due to small numbers of older adults, findings should be interpreted with caution.

The effect of 24-week belimumab treatment withdrawal followed by treatment restart in patients with SLE: an open-label, non-randomised 52-week study

Background

Treatment goals for patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) include minimising disease activity and reducing the risk of flares. Although belimumab is effective at reducing disease activity and risk of severe flares, it was previously unknown what the clinical effects were upon treatment discontinuation. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of temporary withdrawal of intravenous (IV) belimumab in patients with SLE.

Methods

This multicentre, open-label, non-randomised, 52-week study (GSK Study BEL116027; NCT02119156) recruited patients with SLE and stable low disease activity, of whom those on belimumab 10 mg/kg IV plus standard therapy either discontinued belimumab for 24 weeks and then restarted belimumab 10 mg/kg IV every 4 weeks (q4w) for 28 weeks (treatment holiday [TH] group), or continued on belimumab 10 mg/kg IV plus standard therapy q4w for 52 weeks (treatment continuation [TC] group). The primary endpoint was median time to first Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment-SLE Disease Activity Index (SELENA-SLEDAI) Flare Index flare. Secondary and other endpoints included rate of any flare, time to severe flare, time to renal flare and rebound (SELENA-SLEDAI score exceeding parent study baseline). Data on rebound phenomenon in patients with any disease level of SLE who had permanently withdrawn from further belimumab treatment (long-term discontinuation group [LTD]) were also assessed. Safety was assessed.

Results

The primary endpoint was not evaluable in the TH (n = 12) and TC (n = 29) groups as fewer than half of patients flared. Unadjusted flare rates per patient-year were 1.0 during treatment discontinuation and 0.3 during treatment restart (0.6 overall) in the TH group and 0.6 in the TC group; there were no severe or renal flares. No TH patients rebounded; 2 (6.9%) TC patients rebounded; 2 (5.1%) patients in the LTD group rebounded. There were no new safety signals.

Conclusions

Twenty-four-week belimumab discontinuation did not appear to increase the risk of flares or rebound in patients with low SLE disease activity; flare rates were low in both groups. Further studies may help to fully determine the effect of belimumab discontinuation.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02119156. Registered on April 21, 2014.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13075-022-02723-y.

Venous thromboembolism risk in rheumatoid arthritis patients: a systematic review and updated meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients are prone to develop thromboembolic complications due to the chronic inflammatory nature of RA. Only one systematic review and meta-analysis has attempted to evaluate venous thromboembolism risk in RA patients. However, this review has become outdated due to the recent publication of several high-quality retrospective cohort studies. The aim of the study was to evaluate the risks of deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and overall venous thromboembolism event incidence in RA patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Five databases (Web of Science, EMBASE, CENTRAL, Scopus, and MEDLINE) were systematically searched according to PRISMA guidelines for eligible studies. With the available literature, we conducted a random-effect meta-analysis to evaluate odds ratios of deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and venous thromboembolism incidence in RA patients and healthy controls.

RESULTS

We found 12 eligible studies detailing 272,884 RA patients and 2,280,454 age and sex-matched healthy controls. Meta-analysis revealed elevated risks for deep vein thrombosis (Odd's ratio: 2.25), pulmonary embolism (2.15), and overall venous thromboembolism incidence (2.23) in RA patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis provides evidence concerning the elevated risks of deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and venous thromboembolism in RA patients. The findings herein may aid in developing clinical awareness and assisting best practice guideline development for RA patients with thromboembolic complications.

A secondary analysis of the Belimumab International Study in Lupus Nephritis trial examined effects of belimumab on kidney outcomes and preservation of kidney function in patients with lupus nephritis

We performed a post hoc analysis of the Belimumab International Study in Lupus Nephritis (BLISS-LN), a Phase 3, multinational, double-blind, 104-week trial, in which 448 patients with lupus nephritis were randomized to receive intravenous belimumab 10 mg/kg or placebo with standard therapy (cyclophosphamide/azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil). Add-on belimumab was found to be most effective in improving the primary efficacy kidney response and complete kidney response in patients with proliferative lupus nephritis and a baseline urine protein/creatinine ratio under 3 g/g. However, there was no observed improvement in the kidney response with belimumab treatment in patients with lupus nephritis and sub-epithelial deposits or with a baseline protein/creatinine ratio of 3 g/g or more. Belimumab significantly reduced the risk of kidney-related events or death and lupus nephritis flare in the overall population. Belimumab reduced the risk of a sustained 30% or 40% decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) versus standard treatment alone and attenuated the annual rate of eGFR decline in patients who remained on-study. Thus, our data suggest that the addition of belimumab to standard therapy could attenuate the risk of lupus nephritis flare and eGFR decline in a broad spectrum of patients with lupus nephritis.

Investigation of the Clinical, Radiological and Biological Factors Associated with Disease Progression, Phenotypes and Endotypes of COPD in China (COMPASS): study design, protocol and rationale

COPD is heterogeneous, and its presentation varies between countries. The major COPD cohort studies have only been performed in Western populations; the disease is not well characterised in other regions. The COMPASS (Investigation of the Clinical, Radiological and Biological Factors, Humanistic and Healthcare Utilisation Burden Associated with Disease Progression, Phenotypes and Endotypes of COPD in China; NCT04853225) is a prospective, 2.5-year-long, multi-centre, longitudinal, observational study with three aims: 1) to characterise stable and exacerbation phenotypes/endotypes in terms of clinical characteristics, blood and sputum biomarkers, lung microbiome and lung imaging; 2) to understand the relevance of markers of COPD disease progression identified in Western cohorts to Chinese patients; and 3) to characterise treatment pathways and healthcare resource utilisation. COMPASS will recruit 2000 participants, of which 1700 will be in Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) Grades I–IV (n=700, 700, 200 and 100, respectively), 180 participants with chronic bronchitis without airflow limitation and 120 never-smoker healthy controls. Study visits will be at baseline, 6, 18 and 30 months and at exacerbation. Assessments include lung function, exacerbation frequency, health status, blood biomarkers and, in a sub-cohort of 400 patients, chest high-resolution computed tomography, additional blood and sputum biomarkers, airway micro-, viral- and myco-biome, and physical activity. COMPASS will establish a unique clinical and biological dataset in a well-characterised cohort of individuals with COPD in China, with a particular focus on milder patients. As the first study of its kind attempting to understand the disease in an Asian setting, it will provide valuable insights into regional and ethnic differences in COPD.

COMPASS, a prospective, multicentre, observational study of Chinese patients with COPD, will characterise stable and exacerbation phenotypes/endotypes, treatment pathways and HRU, and investigate COPD progression biomarkers' relevance to these patientshttps://bit.ly/3dyIpf1

[Use of alternative pancreatic fistula risk score system for patients with clinical relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula after laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy]

Objective: To examine the application value of alternative pancreatic fistula risk score system(a-FRS) for patients with clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula(CR-POPF) after laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy(LPD). Methods: Clinical data of 400 patients who underwent LPD at Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery,Jilin University First Hospital,from April 2015 to August 2019 were retrospectively analyzed.There were 217 males and 183 females, with age of (M(Q_R)) 58 (53) years (range:26 to 93 years) and body mass index of (23.0±2.7) kg/m² (range:19.4 to 27.1 kg/m²).Preoperative CA19-9 was (171.6±212.7) U/ml (range:32.1 to 762.6 U/ml), and preoperative CA125 was (18.6±22.9) U/ml (range:9.0 to 112.3 U/ml).Univariate analysis and multivariate Logistic regression analysis were implemented to find independent risk factors in CR-POPF.According to 3 indicators of a-FRS system(pancreatic texture,main pancreatic duct diameter,and body mass index),receiver operator characteristic curve was used to prospectively analyze the clinical value of CR-POPF. Results: CR-POPF occurred in 60 patients(15.0%) among the 400 LPD patients,including 54 patients(13.5%) with grade B pancreatic fistula and 6 patients(1.5%) with grade C pancreatic fistula.Univariate and multivariate Logistic regression analysis results showed that soft pancreas,diameter of main pancreatic duct ≤3 mm,and body mass index>23 kg/m² were the independent risk factors for CR-POPF after LPD.The incidence of CR-POPF was 1.9% in the group with low pancreatic fistula risk(0 to 5%),5.9% with moderate pancreatic fistula risk(>5% to 20%),and 80.7% with high pancreatic fistula risk(>20%).a-FRS prospectively predicted the sensitivity and specificity of CR-POPF after LPD was 76.7% and 96.8%,positive predictive value was 80.7%,negative predictive value was 95.9%,positive likelihood ratio was 23.66,negative likelihood ratio was 0.24,and area under the curve was 0.735(95%CI:0.668-0.799). Conclusion: a-FRS system has great clinical application value in predicting CR-POPF after LPD,which can provide basis for early risk prediction of CR-POPF and timely related clinical intervention.

Long-term open-label continuation study of the safety and efficacy of belimumab for up to 7 years in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus from Japan and South Korea

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of belimumab in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) from Japan and South Korea.

METHODS

In this phase III, open-label continuation study (BEL114333; NCT01597622), eligible completers of BEL113750 (NCT01345253) or BEL112341 (NCT01484496) received intravenous belimumab 10 mg/kg every 28 days for ≤7 years. Primary endpoint was safety. Secondary endpoints: SLE Responder Index (SRI)4 response rate, proportion of patients meeting individual SRI4 criteria, SLE flares and prednisone use. Analyses were based on observed data from the first belimumab exposure (either in parent or current study) through to study end.

RESULTS

Of 142 enrolled patients who received belimumab, 73.2% completed the study. The study population comprised patients with moderate SLE, mean (SD) Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment-SLE Disease Activity Index (SELENA-SLEDAI) baseline score of 9.3 (3.9) and 98.6% receiving corticosteroids. Most patients (97.9%) experienced adverse events (AEs); 33.8% experienced serious AEs. Increase in SRI4 (Year 1, Week 24: 47.8%; Year 6, Week 48: 68.2%) and SELENA-SLEDAI responders suggested reductions in disease activity. Proportions of patients with no worsening in Physician Global Assessment/no new organ damage remained stable throughout. Severe SLE flares occurred in 14.8% of patients. Among patients with baseline prednisone-equivalent dose >7.5 mg/day (n=81), the median (min, max) number of days anytime post-baseline that the daily dose was ≤7.5 mg/day or had been reduced by 50% from baseline was 584 (0, 2267).

CONCLUSIONS

Favourable safety profile and treatment responses were maintained for ≤7 years in patients with SLE from Japan and South Korea.

EMBRACE: Phase 3/4, Randomized, 52-Week Study of Belimumab Efficacy and Safety in Patients of Black African Ancestry With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Objective

Enrollment of patients of Black African ancestry with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in phase II and phase III of the belimumab trials was not reflective of the racial distribution observed in the lupus population. This study was undertaken to assess the efficacy and safety of intravenous (IV) belimumab plus standard therapy in patients of self‐identified Black race.

Methods

EMBRACE (GSK Study BEL115471; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01632241) was a 52‐week multicenter, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial in adults of self‐identified Black race with active SLE who received monthly belimumab 10 mg/kg IV, or placebo, plus standard therapy. The optional 26‐week open‐label extension phase included patients who completed the double‐blind phase. The primary end point of the study was SLE Responder Index (SRI) response rate at week 52 with modified proteinuria scoring adapted from the SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI‐2K) (SRI–SLEDAI‐2K). Key secondary end points included SRI response rate at week 52, time to first severe SLE flare, and reductions in prednisone dose.

Results

The modified intent‐to‐treat population comprised 448 patients, of whom 96.9% were women and the mean ± SD age was 38.8 ± 11.42 years. The primary end point (improvement in the SRI–SLEDAI‐2K response rate at week 52) was not achieved (belimumab 48.7%, placebo 41.6%; odds ratio 1.40 [95% confidence interval 0.93, 2.11], P = 0.1068); however, numerical improvements favoring belimumab were observed, in which the SRI–SLEDAI‐2K response rates were higher in those who received belimumab compared with those who received placebo, especially in patients with SLE who had high disease activity or renal manifestations at baseline. The safety profile of belimumab was generally consistent with that observed in previous SLE trials. Adverse events were the primary reasons for double‐blind phase withdrawals (belimumab 5.4%, placebo 6.7%).

Conclusion

The primary end point of this study was not achieved, but improvement with belimumab versus placebo was observed, suggesting that belimumab remains a suitable treatment option for SLE management in patients of Black African ancestry.

POS0696 SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF BELIMUMAB IN OLDER ADULTS WITH SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS: RESULTS OF AN INTEGRATED ANALYSIS

Background:

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic, autoimmune disease characterised by persistent B-cell activation. Belimumab (BEL), a monoclonal antibody that inhibits B-lymphocyte stimulator, is approved in patients aged ≥5 years with active autoantibody-positive SLE; however, safety and efficacy data of BEL in older adults are limited.

Objectives:

Assess the safety and efficacy of BEL in older adults with SLE.

Methods:

A meta-analysis (GSK study 116559) was performed on the subpopulation of patients aged ≥65 years and compared with the overall population pooled from six controlled, repeat-dose (CRD) BEL trials in adults with SLE (GSK studies: 110752, 110751, LBSL02 [safety only], 112341, 113750, and 115471). Additional safety data were obtained from GSK study 115467.

In each trial, patients were randomised to BEL or placebo (PBO) and received ≥1 treatment dose (GSK studies 110752 and 110751: intravenous [IV] BEL 1 or 10 mg/kg; LBSL02: IV BEL 1, 4, or 10 mg/kg; GSK study 112341: subcutaneous BEL 200 mg; GSK studies 113750, 115471, and 115467: IV BEL 10 mg/kg) plus standard therapy. Safety assessments included: incidence of serious adverse events (SAE), mortality and adverse events of special interest (AESI). The primary efficacy analysis for the CRD trials was the SLE Responder Index 4 (SRI4) response rate.

Results:

Older adults (CRD studies: N=63; study 115467: N=156) had lower disease activity and more organ damage compared with the overall populations, and a greater proportion were of white race compared with the overall population in the CRD studies. There were no clinically relevant differences in the incidence of SAE or death between older adults and the overall populations (Table 1). Rates of AESI (post-infusion/injection systemic reactions [PISR], serious infections of special interest, malignancies, psychiatric events) were generally similar or lower in older adults compared with the overall populations with no imbalances between BEL and PBO in older adults (Table 1). No malignancies were reported in older adults. The SRI4 response rate in older adults favoured BEL vs PBO (OR [95% CI], 1.49 [0.49, 4.58]), consistent with the overall populations of the individual CRD studies (110752 and 110751 pooled [10 mg/kg IV]: 1.68 [1.32, 2.15]; 112341: 1.68 [1.25, 2.25]; 113750: 1.99 [1.40, 2.82]; 115471: 1.42 [0.94, 2.15]).

Conclusion:

In patients with SLE, the safety and efficacy of BEL in older adults were generally consistent with the overall population and suggest a favourable benefit–risk profile. Due to the small number of older adults analysed, these data should be interpreted with caution.

Funding:

GSK

Table 1.

SAE, deaths, and AESI

N (%)*Study 115467CRD studies†Older adults(N=156)Overall(N=4003)Older adults(N=63)Overall(N=4170)PBON=82BELN=74PBON=2001BELN=2002PBON=27BELN=36PBON=1355BELN=2815SAE9 (11.0)6 (8.1)222 (11.1)220 (11.0)5 (18.5)10 (27.8)230 (17.0)421 (15.0)Death‡1 (1.2)1 (1.4)11 (0.5)12 (0.6)006 (0.4)16 (0.6)AESI PISR§,‖,¶----02 (5.6)110 (8.1)286 (10.2)  Serious PISR002 (<0.1)8 (0.4)002 (0.1)13 (0.5)Infections of SI (opportunistic, herpes zoster, tuberculosis, sepsis)§02 (2.7)50 (2.5)36 (1.8)1 (3.7)097 (7.2)173 (6.1)Serious infections of SI02 (2.7)17 (0.8)17 (0.8)0017 (1.3)40 (1.4)Malignancies ex. non-melanoma skin cancer§005 (0.2)5 (0.2)002 (0.1)8 (0.3)Depression(inc. mood disorders /anxiety)/suicide/self-injury§,¶,**-‖---3 (11.1)3 (8.3)92 (6.8)210 (7.5)Serious depression/ suicide/self-injury01 (1.4)6 (0.3)18 (0.9)1 (3.7)05 (0.4)9 (0.3)

*Patients counted once/category; †Pooled data from all studies except 115467; ‡Study 115467: fatal SAEs that started during on-treatment period; death may have occurred after period end. CRD studies: all deaths during double-blind period; §Per custom MedDRA query; ‖Occurring on/within 3 days of infusion/injection; ¶Study 115467: only serious PISR and serious depression/suicide/self-injury events collected; **Per standard MedDRA query.

MedDRA, Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities; SI, special interest

Acknowledgements:

Medical writing assistance was provided by Helen Taylor, Fishawack Indicia Ltd., UK, part of Fishawack Health, and was funded by GSK.

Disclosure of Interests:

David d’cruz Speakers bureau: GSK, Consultant of: GSK, Eli Lilly, Gina Eriksson Shareholder of: GSK, Employee of: GSK, Yulia Green Shareholder of: GSK, Employee of: GSK, Anne Hammer Shareholder of: GSK, Employee of: GSK, Beulah Ji Shareholder of: GSK, Employee of: GSK, Paige Meizlik Shareholder of: GSK, Employee of: GSK, David Roth Shareholder of: GSK, Employee of: GSK

Mortality and adverse events of special interest with intravenous belimumab for adults with active, autoantibody-positive systemic lupus erythematosus (BASE): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 4 trial

BACKGROUND

Belimumab is approved for the treatment of active systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Although clinical trials showed a favourable benefit-risk profile, numerical differences in the incidence of mortality and adverse events of special interest (AESIs) have been reported. We assessed the frequency of these events in patients with SLE receiving belimumab or placebo plus standard therapy.

METHODS

BASE was a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 4 trial done in 33 countries. Adults with active SLE were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive intravenous belimumab (10 mg/kg) or placebo, plus standard therapy, for 48 weeks. The primary endpoints were incidences of all-cause mortality and AESIs during the on-treatment period (first-to-last study drug dose + 28 days). Safety analyses were done in the as-treated population (patients grouped by actual treatment received >50% of the time). This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01705977).

FINDINGS

Between Nov 27, 2012, and July 28, 2017, we randomly assigned 4018 patients. The as-treated population included 2002 patients in the belimumab group versus 2001 in the placebo group. Ten (0·50%) patients in the belimumab group died versus eight (0·40%) in the placebo group (difference 0·10%, 95% CI -0·31 to 0·51). Incidences were similar in the belimumab and placebo groups for serious infections (75 [3·75%] of 2002 vs 82 [4·10%] of 2001; difference -0·35%, 95% CI -1·55 to 0·85), opportunistic infections and other infections of interest (36 [1·80%] vs 50 [2·50%]; -0·70%, -1·60 to 0·20), non-melanoma skin cancers (4 [0·20%] vs 3 [0·15%]; 0·05%, -0·21 to 0·31) and other malignancies (5 [0·25%] vs 5 [0·25%]; 0·00%, -0·31 to 0·31). A higher proportion of patients in the belimumab group than in the placebo group had infusion and hypersensitivity reactions (8 [0·40%] vs 2 [0·10%]; 0·30%, -0·01 to 0·61), serious depression (7 [0·35%] vs 1 [0·05%]; 0·30%, 0·02 to 0·58), treatment-emergent suicidality (28 [1·42%] of 1972 patients vs 23 [1·16%] of 1986; 0·26%, -0·44 to 0·96), and sponsor-adjudicated serious suicide or self-injury (15 [0·75%] of 1972 patients vs 5 [0·25%] of 1986; post hoc difference 0·50%, 0·06 to 0·94).

INTERPRETATION

In line with previously published data, incidences of all-cause mortality and AESIs were similar in patients given belimumab and placebo, except for serious infusion or hypersensitivity reactions, serious depression, treatment-emergent suicidality, and sponsor-adjudicated serious suicide or self-injury events.

FUNDING

GSK.

Pharmacokinetics of Belimumab in Children With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

The phase 2 placebo-controlled, double-blind PLUTO trial characterized the pharmacokinetics of belimumab plus standard systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) therapy in patients with childhood-onset SLE (cSLE) and demonstrated similar efficacy and safety to that in adult SLE. Patients with active cSLE aged 5-17 years were randomized to intravenous belimumab 10 mg/kg every 4 weeks (n = 53). A linear 2-compartment population pharmacokinetics (popPK) model with first-order elimination was developed, and an exploratory exposure-response analysis assessed the impact of between-patient exposure variability on clinical response (SLE Responder Index 4 [SRI4]) in week 52, and occurrence of serious adverse events during the study. The popPK model estimated clearance of 158 mL/day, steady-state volume of distribution of 3.5 L, terminal half-life of 16.3 days, and distribution half-life of 0.8 days in the overall population. Fat-free mass (FFM) better characterized the pharmacokinetics than total body weight and was more consistent with allometric scaling theory; belimumab pharmacokinetics were largely determined by FFM. Age, sex, disease activity, and concomitant medication had no impact on pediatric belimumab exposure after accounting for body size. Individual and median steady-state pediatric pharmacokinetic profiles were similar to known adult profiles and pediatric exposure estimates for belimumab 10 mg/kg intravenously were consistent with adult exposures. Exposures were similar between SRI4 responders and nonresponders, and patients who did or did not experience a serious adverse event. There was no clinically relevant correlation between exposure and efficacy or safety, confirming belimumab 10 mg/kg intravenous dose every 4 weeks as appropriate for pediatric patients with cSLE.

[The value of "posterior approach, uncinate process priority, artery first" in laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy]

Objective: To explore the value of "posterior approach, uncinate process priority, artery first" in laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy. Methods: The clinical data of 200 patients who underwent laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy from January 2018 to April 2019 in the Second Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, the First Hospital of Jilin University were analyzed retrospectively. Meanwhile, the advantages of "posterior approach, uncinate process priority, artery first" were analyzed. Results: Two hundred patients were treated with "posterior approach, uncinate process priority, artery first". The average total operation time was (260.2±50.1) min, sample cutting time was (86.6±18.7) min, intraoperative bleeding volume was 50 (50-100) ml, average number of lymph node dissection was (19.2±7.4), and average hospitalization time was (17.9±9.9) days. Conclusion: The "posterior approach, uncinate process first, artery first" approach not only protects the variant hepatic artery, but also allows early detection of SMA, clarifies the positional relationship between the tumor and SMA, realizes R0 resection, and reduces the amount of bleeding during operation and shortens the operation time, which is safe and feasible in clinical setting.

Two-Year, Randomized, Controlled Trial of Belimumab in Lupus Nephritis

BACKGROUND

In adults with active lupus nephritis, the efficacy and safety of intravenous belimumab as compared with placebo, when added to standard therapy (mycophenolate mofetil or cyclophosphamide-azathioprine), are unknown.

METHODS

In a phase 3, multinational, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 104-week trial conducted at 107 sites in 21 countries, we assigned adults with biopsy-proven, active lupus nephritis in a 1:1 ratio to receive intravenous belimumab (at a dose of 10 mg per kilogram of body weight) or matching placebo, in addition to standard therapy. The primary end point at week 104 was a primary efficacy renal response (a ratio of urinary protein to creatinine of ≤0.7, an estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] that was no worse than 20% below the value before the renal flare (pre-flare value) or ≥60 ml per minute per 1.73 m² of body-surface area, and no use of rescue therapy), and the major secondary end point was a complete renal response (a ratio of urinary protein to creatinine of <0.5, an eGFR that was no worse than 10% below the pre-flare value or ≥90 ml per minute per 1.73 m², and no use of rescue therapy). The time to a renal-related event or death was assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 448 patients underwent randomization (224 to the belimumab group and 224 to the placebo group). At week 104, significantly more patients in the belimumab group than in the placebo group had a primary efficacy renal response (43% vs. 32%; odds ratio, 1.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.0 to 2.3; P = 0.03) and a complete renal response (30% vs. 20%; odds ratio, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.1 to 2.7; P = 0.02). The risk of a renal-related event or death was lower among patients who received belimumab than among those who received placebo (hazard ratio, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.34 to 0.77; P = 0.001). The safety profile of belimumab was consistent with that in previous trials.

CONCLUSIONS

In this trial involving patients with active lupus nephritis, more patients who received belimumab plus standard therapy had a primary efficacy renal response than those who received standard therapy alone. (Funded by GlaxoSmithKline; BLISS-LN ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01639339.).

LB001EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF BELIMUMAB IN PATIENTS WITH ACTIVE LUPUS NEPHRITIS: A PHASE 3, RANDOMISED, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIAL

Background and Aims

Belimumab (BEL), an anti-B-cell-activating factor (BAFF) monoclonal antibody, is approved in patients (pts) ≥5 years of age with active systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Post hoc analyses of pooled renal outcomes data from two Phase 3 SLE studies showed favourable trends of greater reduction in proteinuria, haematuria, pyuria and lower renal flare rates in BEL-treated pts vs placebo (PBO).1 This is the largest study in acute lupus nephritis (LN) to date that evaluated efficacy and safety of intravenous (IV) BEL plus standard therapy (ST) in pts with active LN.

Method

BLISS-LN is a Phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 104-week study (GSK study BEL114054, NCT01639339); eligible pts (≥18 years) with autoantibody-positive SLE and active, biopsy-proven LN (classes III, IV and/or V) were randomised (1:1) to monthly BEL 10 mg/kg IV or PBO, plus ST. Randomisation was stratified by induction regimen: high dose corticosteroids [HDCS] plus either cyclophosphamide (CyC), followed by azathioprine + low dose corticosteroids (LDCS), or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), followed by MMF + LDCS. Primary endpoint: primary efficacy renal response (PERR; defined as urine protein creatinine ratio [uPCR] ≤0.7; estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] no more than 20% below pre-flare value or ≥60 ml/min/1.73m2; no rescue therapy) at Week (Wk) 104. Key secondary endpoints: complete renal response (CRR; defined as uPCR &lt;0.5; eGFR no more than 10% below pre-flare value or ≥90 ml/min/1.73m2; no rescue therapy) at Wk 104; PERR at Wk 52; risk of renal-related event (defined as end-stage renal disease/doubling of serum creatinine/renal worsening/renal disease-related treatment failure) or death at any time up to Wk 104. Other endpoints: PERR and CRR at Wk 104 by induction regimen; proportions of pts with baseline uPCR ≥0.5 with uPCR shift to &lt;0.5 while on study.

Results

Overall, 448 pts were randomised (efficacy: 223/treatment group; safety: 224/treatment group); 118 pts received CyC induction and 328 MMF induction; 278 (62.3%) completed the treatment.

At Wk 104, 43.0% BEL and 32.3% PBO pts achieved PERR (OR [95% CI] vs PBO 1.55 [1.04, 2.32], p=0.0311); 30.0% BEL and 19.7% PBO pts achieved CRR (OR [95% CI] vs PBO 1.74 [1.11, 2.74], p=0.0167). Over 104 weeks, more BEL than PBO pts achieved CRR at each visit (Figure 1A). PERR at Wk 52 was achieved by 46.6% BEL and 35.4% PBO pts (OR [95% CI] vs PBO 1.59 [1.06, 2.38], p=0.0245).

The risk of a renal-related event or death was 49% lower with BEL than PBO (HR [95%CI] 0.51 [0.34, 0.77]; p=0.0014) at any time point during the study. Overall, 15.7% of BEL and 28.3% of PBO pts experienced a renal-related event or death.

When analysed by induction regimen, PERR at Wk 104 was achieved by 33.9% BEL and 27.1% PBO CyC-induced pts (OR [95% CI] vs PBO 1.52 [0.66, 3.49], p=0.3272), and by 46.3% BEL and 34.1% PBO MMF-induced pts (OR [95% CI] vs PBO 1.58 [1.00, 2.51], p=0.0501). CRR at Wk 104 was achieved by 18.6% BEL and 18.6% PBO CyC-induced pts (OR [95% CI] vs PBO 1.07 [0.41, 2.78], p=0.8843), and by 34.1% BEL and 20.1% PBO MMF-induced pts (OR [95% CI] vs PBO 2.01 [1.19, 3.38], p=0.0085).

Proportions of pts with uPCR shift from ≥0.5 at baseline to &lt;0.5 while on study (calculated post hoc) are presented in the Figure 1B.

Overall, 95.5% BEL and 94.2% PBO pts had ≥1 adverse event (AE); 25.9% BEL and 29.9% PBO pts had ≥1 serious AE; 13.8% BEL and 17.0% PBO pts had serious infections; 12.9% pts in each group had ≥1 AE resulting in study treatment discontinuation; on-treatment fatal AEs were reported in 1.8% BEL and 1.3% PBO pts.

Conclusion

BEL demonstrated improved renal responses vs PBO in pts with active LN, with a safety profile consistent with previous BEL trials.

OP0164 BLISS-LN: A RANDOMISED, DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED PHASE 3 TRIAL OF INTRAVENOUS BELIMUMAB IN PATIENTS WITH ACTIVE LUPUS NEPHRITIS

Background:

Lupus nephritis (LN), a serious manifestation of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), affects nearly 70% of patients (pts) in high-risk groups. To preserve renal function, LN requires fast and effective treatment. Despite medical advances, progression rates at 15 years to end-stage renal disease (ESRD) remain >40% for pts with diffuse proliferative LN. Belimumab (BEL), approved in pts aged ≥5 years with active SLE, improved renal parameters in pts with baseline renal involvement in apost hocanalysis of Phase 3 trials data.

Objectives:

To assess efficacy and safety of intravenous (IV) BEL vs placebo (PBO), plus standard therapy (ST), in pts with active LN.

Methods:

BLISS-LN is a Phase 3, randomised, double-blind, PBO-controlled, 104-week study (GSK Study BEL114054,NCT01639339). Adults with SLE and biopsy-proven LN (class III, IV, and/or V) were randomised (1:1) to monthly BEL 10 mg/kg IV or PBO, plus ST. Primary endpoint: Primary Efficacy Renal Response (PERR); defined as urine protein creatinine ratio [uPCR] ≤0.7; estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] within 20% of the pre-flare value or ≥60 ml/min/1.73m2; no rescue therapy) at Week (Wk) 104. Key secondary endpoints: Complete Renal Response (CRR; defined as uPCR <0.5; eGFR within 10% of the pre-flare value or ≥90 ml/min/1.73m2; no rescue therapy) at Wk 104; PERR at Wk 52; time to renal-related event (defined as ESRD/doubling of serum creatinine/renal worsening/renal disease-related treatment failure) or death. Other endpoints: time to PERR/CRR sustained through Wk 104; SLEDAI-S2K score <4 points at Wk 104; safety.

Results:

Overall, 448 pts were randomised (efficacy: 223/group; safety: 224/group). Significantly more BEL (43%) than PBO (32.3%) pts achieved PERR at Wk 104 (OR 1.55, 95% CI 1.04, 2.32; p=0.0311). More BEL than PBO pts achieved key secondary and other efficacy endpoints (Table).

Overall, 214 (95.5%) BEL and 211 (94.2%) PBO pts had ≥1 adverse event (AE); 58 (25.9%) BEL and 67 (29.9%) PBO pts had ≥1 serious AE; 29 (12.9%) pts in each group had ≥1 AE resulting in study treatment discontinuation; 4 (1.8%) BEL and 3 (1.3%) PBO pts developed on-treatment fatal AEs.

Conclusion:

In the largest LN study to date, data from BLISS-LN demonstrate that BEL plus ST significantly improves LN renal responses compared with ST alone with a favourable safety profile.

Study funding: GSK.

Table.Endpoint, n (%)PBO(n=223)BEL(n=223)OR/HR (95% CI) vs PBOp-valueCRR at Wk 104*44 (19.7)67 (30.0)OR 1.74(1.11, 2.74)0.0167PERR at Wk 52*79 (35.4)104 (46.6)OR 1.59(1.06, 2.38)0.0245Time to PERR throughWk 104†72 (32.3)96 (43.0)HR 1.46(1.07, 1.98)0.0157Time to CRR throughWk 104†44 (19.7)67 (30.0)HR 1.58(1.08, 2.31)0.0189Time to renal-related event or death†63 (28.3)35 (15.7)HR 0.51(0.34, 0.77)0.0014SLEDAI-S2K score <4 points at Wk 104*41 (18.4)62 (27.8)OR 1.76(1.11, 2.78)0.0164

*PBO and BEL columns represent the n (%) responders

†Data presented as n (cumulative incidence)

Disclosure of Interests:

Richard Furie Grant/research support from: GSK, Consultant of: GSK, Brad H Rovin Grant/research support from: GSK, Consultant of: GSK, Frederic Houssiau Grant/research support from: UCB, Consultant of: GSK, Zahir Amoura Grant/research support from: GSK, Roche, Consultant of: GSK, Astra Zeneca, Amgen, Mittermayer Santiago: None declared, Gabriel Contreras Grant/research support from: Genentech, Merck, Consultant of: Genentech, Merck, Ana Malvar Consultant of: GSK and Roche, chi chiu mok: None declared, Amit Saxena Consultant of: GSK, AZ, BMS, Xueqing Yu: None declared, Y.K. Onno Teng Grant/research support from: GSK, Consultant of: GSK, Aurinia Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Carly Barnett Shareholder of: GSK, Employee of: GSK, Susan Burriss Shareholder of: GSK, Employee of: GSK, Yulia Green Shareholder of: GSK, Employee of: GSK, Beulah Ji Shareholder of: GSK, Employee of: GSK, Christi Kleoudis Shareholder of: GSK, Consultant of: GSK, Employee of: Parexel, David Roth Shareholder of: GSK, Employee of: GSK

THU0503 PLUTO TRIAL: SENSITIVITY ANALYSES OF SRI4 RESPONSE WITH BELIMUMAB VS PLACEBO IN PAEDIATRIC PATIENTS WITH CHILDHOOD-ONSET SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS (CSLE)

Background:

Belimumab (BEL) is the first treatment approved in children ≥5 years of age with cSLE. This recent approval was based on favourable results of the PLUTO trial, evaluating efficacy and safety of intravenous (IV) BEL, plus standard SLE therapy (SST), vs placebo (PBO), in children with cSLE.1

Objectives:

To evaluate the SLE Responder Index 4 (SRI4) sensitivity of response for the comparison of BEL vs PBO at Week (Wk) 52.

Methods:

In PLUTO (NCT01649765; GSK study BEL114055), an ongoing Phase 2, randomised, PBO-controlled, double-blind study, patients (pts) 5–17 years of age with active cSLE were randomised to monthly BEL 10 mg/kg IV, or PBO, plus SST, for 52 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was the SRI4 response rate at Wk 52. Pre-specified sensitivity analyses supporting the primary efficacy endpoint for the intention-to-treat (ITT) population included unadjusted, last observation carried forward (LOCF), completer responses, and response using SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) 2K proteinuria scoring rule (4-point score for proteinuria >0.5 g/24 h), all at Wk 52. Completers were pts who completed 52 weeks of treatment. Any pts who withdrew or received protocol-prohibited medication or a dose of allowable medication that resulted in treatment failure prior to the Wk 52 visit had missing data handled using LOCF (missing values imputed using the last previous non-missing value). Statistics are descriptive.

Results:

Overall, 93 pts were randomised (BEL, n=53; PBO, n=40). Majority (94.6%) of pts were female, mean (standard deviation [SD]) age was 14.0 (2.49) years and mean (SD) disease duration was 2.4 (1.93) years. By Wk 52, numerically more BEL (52.8%) than PBO (43.6%) pts were SRI4 responders; difference vs PBO 9.24; odds ratio (OR; 95% confidence interval [CI]) vs PBO 1.49 (0.64, 3.46). For each sensitivity analysis (unadjusted, LOCF, completer, and SLEDAI 2K responses) the odds of being a responder at Wk 52 were higher for pts receiving BEL vs PBO (Table).

Table.

Sensitivity analyses: SRI4 response at Wk 52

PBO(n=40)BEL(n=53)Unadjusted response (ITT), n*3953 n (%)17 (43.6)28 (52.8) Observed difference vs PBO9.24 OR (95% CI)†vs PBO1.45 (0.63, 3.33)LOCF response (ITT), n*3953 n (%)18 (46.2)30 (56.6) Observed difference vs PBO10.45 OR (95% CI)‡vs PBO1.51 (0.65, 3.52)Completer response (completers), n*3045 n (%)17 (56.7)27 (60.0) Observed difference vs PBO3.33 OR (95% CI)‡vs PBO1.16 (0.44, 3.09)Response using SLEDAI 2K (ITT), n*3953 n (%)17 (43.6)28 (52.8) Observed difference vs PBO9.24 OR (95% CI)‡vs PBO1.49 (0.64, 3.46)

*One pt was excluded because they did not have a baseline Safety of Estrogens in Lupus National Assessment (SELENA)-SLEDAI assessment;†calculated from a logistic regression model for the comparison between BEL and PBO without adjustment for any covariates;‡calculated from a logistic regression model for the comparison between BEL and PBO with covariates treatment group, baseline age (5–11 years vs 12–17 years), and baseline SELENA-SLEDAI score (≤12 vs ≥13)

Conclusion:

The results of the SRI4 primary efficacy endpoint sensitivity analyses further support a favourable effect for BEL vs PBO.

References:

[1]Brunner HI,et al.Arthritis Rheumatol.2018;70(59): 3224–5, Abst. 2867

Acknowledgments:

We acknowledge all PLUTO investigators (PRINTO, PRCSG and otherwise affiliated). Study funding: GSK.

Disclosure of Interests:

Nicolino Ruperto Consultant of: Ablynx, AbbVie, AstraZeneca-Medimmune, Biogen, Boehringer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli-Lilly, EMD Serono, GSK, Hoffmann-La Roche, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, R-Pharma, Sanofi, Servier, Sinergie, Sobi and Takeda, Hermine Brunner Consultant of: Hoffman-La Roche, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi Aventis, Merck Serono, AbbVie, Amgen, Alter, AstraZeneca, Baxalta Biosimilars, Biogen Idec, Boehringer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, EMD Serono, Janssen, MedImmune, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB Biosciences, Speakers bureau: GSK, Roche, and Novartis, Masaaki Mori Grant/research support from: Abbvie Japan, Asahikasei Pharmaceutical, Ayumi Pharmaceutical, CSL Behring, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Japan Blood Products Organization, MSD K.K., Nippon Kayaku, UCB Japan, Consultant of: Daiichi Sankyo, Taisho Pharmaceutical, Jacqueline Clinch Consultant of: Alexion, Speakers bureau: Alexion, Reema Syed: None declared, Naomi Iwata Speakers bureau: Sanofi K.K, Damon Bass Shareholder of: GSK, Employee of: GSK, Beulah Ji Shareholder of: GSK, Employee of: GSK, Anne Hammer Shareholder of: GSK, Employee of: GSK, Mohamed Okily Shareholder of: GSK, Employee of: GSK, Gina Eriksson Shareholder of: GSK, Employee of: GSK, Holly Quasny Shareholder of: GSK, Employee of: GSK

SAT0505 PLUTO TRIAL OF INTRAVENOUS BELIMUMAB IN PAEDIATRIC PATIENTS WITH CHILDHOOD-ONSET SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS (cSLE): PATIENT RESPONSES OVER TIME

Background:

Belimumab (BEL) is a human monoclonal antibody that specifically inhibits B-cell activating factor (BAFF). PLUTO is an ongoing trial evaluating efficacy and safety of intravenous (IV) BEL in children ≥5 years of age with cSLE. Efficacy, and safety endpoints of PLUTO have been reported;1briefly, numerically more BEL vs PBO pts met the primary and major secondary efficacy endpoints. We present patient (pt) response to BEL over time.

Objectives:

To evaluate changes in SLE Responder Index (SRI) 4 and SRI6 responses, and disease activity over 52 weeks, in paediatric pts receiving BEL, or placebo (PBO), plus standard SLE therapy (SST).

Methods:

PLUTO (GSK Study BEL114055,NCT01649765) is a Phase 2, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Pts 5–17 years of age with active cSLE were randomised to monthly BEL 10 mg/kg IV, or PBO, plus SST. Endpoints assessed: SRI4 and SRI6 response rate, mean percentage and absolute change from baseline in Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment (SELENA)-SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) and Physicians’ Global Assessment (PGA) scores, and percentage of pts with no new British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) 1A/2B organ domain scores compared with baseline, all by study visit. The last-observation-carried-forward (LOCF) principle (missing values imputed using the last available non-missing value) was applied to pts who withdrew or received protocol-prohibited medication or a dose of allowable medication that resulted in treatment failure prior to the Week (Wk) 52 visit. Descriptive statistics were used.

Results:

A total of 93 pts (94.6% female, mean [SD] age 14.0 [2.49] years) were randomised for the intention-to-treat (ITT) population: 53 to BEL and 40 to PBO. Mean (SD) BEL and PBO baseline scores were 10.3 (3.34) and 10.4 (3.63) for SELENA-SLEDAI and 1.3 (0.43) and 1.4 (0.42) for PGA, respectively. Pt number with at least BILAG 1A/2B organ domain involvement at baseline was 37 (69.8%) for BEL and 29 (72.5%) for PBO. SRI4 and SRI6 responses over 52 weeks were mostly numerically higher with BEL than PBO; more BEL than PBO pts were SRI4 and SRI6 responders at Wk 52 (Figure 1). Unadjusted mean (SE) percentage changes from baseline over time in SELENA-SLEDAI and PGA scores generally favoured BEL over PBO, as did unadjusted mean (SE) absolute changes (Figure 2). Wk 52 adjusted mean (95% CI) percentage treatment difference vs PBO was -4.0% (-21.8, 13.9) for SELENA-SLEDAI and -6.1% (-23.9, 11.7) for PGA, while Wk 52 adjusted mean (95% CI) treatment difference vs PBO was -0.7 (-2.4, 1.1) for SELENA-SLEDAI and -0.1 (-0.3, 0.1) for PGA. Over the study duration, numerically more BEL than PBO pts had no new BILAG 1A/2B organ domain scores (Figure 2).

Figure 1.

SRI4 and SRI6 response by study visit

Figure 2.

SELENA-SLEDAI and PGA score mean percentage and absolute change from baseline, and no new BILAG 1A/2B organ domain scores compared with baseline, all by study visit

Conclusion:

In line with the main analyses performed at Wk 52,1further analyses of responses over time in SRI4, SRI6 and disease activity generally favoured BEL over PBO. Combined, these results continue to support the efficacy profile of IV BEL in the treatment of children with cSLE.

References:

[1]Brunner HI,et al.Arthritis Rheumatol.2018;70(59): 3224–5, Abst. 2867

Acknowledgments:

We acknowledge all PLUTO investigators (PRINTO, PRCSG and otherwise affiliated). Study funding: GSK.

Disclosure of Interests:

Nicolino Ruperto Consultant of: Ablynx, AbbVie, AstraZeneca-Medimmune, Biogen, Boehringer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli-Lilly, EMD Serono, GSK, Hoffmann-La Roche, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, R-Pharma, Sanofi, Servier, Sinergie, Sobi and Takeda, Liza McCann: None declared, Syuji Takei Grant/research support from: Eisai, Consultant of: Novartis, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Speakers bureau: GSK, Sanofi, Tanabe-Mitsubishi, Novartis, Chugai, Ono, Abbvie, Eli-Lilly, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Clarissa Pilkington: None declared, Damon Bass Shareholder of: GSK, Employee of: GSK, Beulah Ji Shareholder of: GSK, Employee of: GSK, Anne Hammer Shareholder of: GSK, Employee of: GSK, Mohamed Okily Shareholder of: GSK, Employee of: GSK, Gina Eriksson Shareholder of: GSK, Employee of: GSK, Holly Quasny Shareholder of: GSK, Employee of: GSK, Hermine Brunner Consultant of: Hoffman-La Roche, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi Aventis, Merck Serono, AbbVie, Amgen, Alter, AstraZeneca, Baxalta Biosimilars, Biogen Idec, Boehringer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, EMD Serono, Janssen, MedImmune, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB Biosciences, Speakers bureau: GSK, Roche, and Novartis

SAT0193 A PHASE 3, OPEN-LABEL, CONTINUATION STUDY EVALUATING LONG-TERM SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF BELIMUMAB IN PATIENTS FROM JAPAN AND KOREA WITH SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS, FOR UP TO 7 YEARS

Background:

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disorder more prevalent in the Asian population vs Caucasians. Belimumab (BEL), a monoclonal antibody targeting B-lymphocyte stimulator, is approved in patients (pts) ≥5 years with active, autoantibody-positive SLE.

Objectives:

Evaluate long-term safety and efficacy of intravenous (IV) BEL + standard SLE therapy (SST) in pts with SLE in Japan/Korea.

Methods:

In this Phase 3, multicentre, open-label (OL) study (BEL114333;NCT01597622), eligible (≥18 years of age) completers of the double-blind phase of GSK study BEL113750 in Japan and South Korea or the subcutaneous OL phase of GSK Study BEL112341 in Japan, received monthly BEL 10 mg/kg IV plus SST. Primary endpoints: safety assessments. Key secondary endpoints: SRI4 response rate at each scheduled visit (observed data), defined as a ≥4-point reduction from baseline in SELENA-SLEDAI score, no worsening in PGA (<0.3-point increase from baseline) and no new BILAG 1A/2B organ domain scores; time to first severe SFI flare over time. Endpoints were analysed relative to first BEL dose (parent or current study). No follow-up data were collected after study withdrawal.

Results:

Overall, 142 pts were enrolled (Japan n=72; Korea n=70), 104 (73.2%) completed the study, 1 (0.7%) died and 37 (26.1%) withdrew.

Overall, 139 (97.9%) pts had ≥1 adverse event (AE) (Table). Most frequent AEs included: nasopharyngitis (60.6%); headache (28.2%); cough, herpes zoster and viral upper respiratory tract infection (18.3% each). Serious AEs (SAEs) occurred in 48 (33.8%) pts. Most common SAEs were infections and infestations, reported in 24 (16.9%) pts (Table). During this study, the annual incidence of AEs, including SAEs and AESI, remained stable or declined, with no trends of clinical concerns regarding the incidence of Grade 3 or 4 values for laboratory parameters. There was 1 transient positive immunogenicity result of no clinical concern.

Table.

The proportion of SRI4 responders was 47.8% at Year 1 (Week 24) and tended to increase numerically up to 84.6% at Year 7 (Week 48). The proportion of pts with a ≥4-point decrease from baseline in SELENA-SLEDAI score numerically increased from 51.5% at Year 1 (Week 24) to 84.6% at Year 7 (Week 48). Proportion of pts with no PGA worsening was 91.3-100% and the proportion with no new BILAG 1A/2B organ domain scores was 93.3-100% up to Year 7 (Week 48). A total of 21 (14.8%) pts had 24 severe SFI flares.

Conclusion:

BEL was well tolerated as add-on therapy to SST for ≤7 years in pts with SLE from Japan/Korea. Safety results were consistent with the known BEL safety profile.

Study funding: GSK.

Disclosure of Interests:

Yoshiya Tanaka Grant/research support from: Received research grants from Asahi-Kasei, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Chugai, Takeda, Sanofi, Bristol-Myers, UCB, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Ono, Speakers bureau: Received speaking fees and/or honoraria from Daiichi-Sankyo, Astellas, Chugai, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, AbbVie, YL Biologics, Bristol-Myers, Takeda, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Novartis, Eisai, Janssen, Teijin, Sang-Cheol Bae: None declared, Damon Bass Shareholder of: GSK, Employee of: GSK, Myron Chu Shareholder of: GSK, Employee of: GSK, Paula Curtis Shareholder of: GSK, Employee of: GSK, Kathleen DeRose Shareholder of: GSK, Employee of: GSK, Beulah Ji Shareholder of: GSK, Employee of: GSK, Regina Kurrasch Shareholder of: GSK, Employee of: GSK, Jenny Lowe Shareholder of: GSK, Employee of: GSK, Paige Meizlik Shareholder of: GSK, Employee of: GSK, David Roth Shareholder of: GSK, Employee of: GSK

The role of baseline BLyS levels and type 1 interferon-inducible gene signature status in determining belimumab response in systemic lupus erythematosus: a post hoc meta-analysis

Background

Elevated B lymphocyte stimulator (BLyS) levels in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) correlate positively with disease activity; BLyS expression is directly linked to interferon (IFN) pathway activation. This post hoc meta-analysis of BLISS-52 and BLISS-76 explored the relationship between baseline BLyS mRNA/protein levels and/or type 1 IFN-inducible gene signature (IFN-1) and responses to the BLyS-targeting monoclonal antibody belimumab in SLE.

Methods

In BLISS-52 and BLISS-76, patients with autoantibody-positive SLE and a SELENA-SLEDAI score ≥ 6 and receiving stable standard SLE therapy were randomised to intravenous belimumab 10 mg/kg or placebo, plus standard of care (SoC), for 52 or 76 weeks. For this post hoc meta-analysis, patients with an appropriate mRNA sample were stratified by BLyS mRNA expression (tertiles: high/medium/low; revised quantiles: high/low), IFN-1 mRNA expression (high/low) and BLyS protein level (high/low). Co-primary endpoints were correlation between baseline BLyS and IFN-1 mRNA levels and SLE Responder Index (SRI)4 response at week 52 within BLyS/IFN-1 subgroups. Secondary endpoints included time to first severe SELENA-SLEDAI Flare Index (SFI) flare.

Results

Of 554 patients included in this analysis, 281 had received belimumab and 273 had received placebo. Baseline BLyS and IFN-1 mRNA levels were highly correlated (Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient 0.7799; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.7451, 0.8106; p < 0.0001). The proportion of SRI4 responders was higher with belimumab versus placebo in all subgroups, but the difference reached statistical significance in the medium BLyS mRNA tertile (odds ratio [OR] 2.17; 95% CI 1.16, 4.04; p = 0.0153), high BLyS mRNA quantile (OR 1.58; 95% CI 1.02, 2.44; p = 0.0402), high IFN-1 mRNA (OR 1.58; 95% CI: 1.08, 2.31; p = 0.0186) and high BLyS protein (OR 3.57; 95% CI 1.63, 7.83; p = 0.0015) subgroups only. The risk of severe SFI flare was significantly lower with belimumab than placebo in the high BLyS mRNA quantile (hazard ratio [HR] 0.59; 95% CI 0.36, 0.97; p = 0.0371) and high BLyS protein (HR 0.39; 95% CI 0.19, 0.79; p = 0.0090) subgroups.

Conclusions

This post hoc meta-analysis demonstrated a tendency towards improved response to add-on intravenous belimumab 10 mg/kg versus SoC alone in patients with high baseline BLyS protein and IFN-1 mRNA levels and medium/high BLyS mRNA levels.

Long-term safety and limited organ damage in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus treated with belimumab: a Phase III study extension

OBJECTIVE

This extension study of the Phase III, randomized, placebo-controlled Belimumab International SLE Study (BLISS)-52 and BLISS-76 studies allowed non-US patients with SLE to continue belimumab treatment, in order to evaluate its long-term safety and tolerability including organ damage accrual.

METHODS

In this multicentre, long-term extension study (GlaxoSmithKline Study BEL112234) patients received i.v. belimumab every 4 weeks plus standard therapy. Adverse events (AEs) were assessed monthly and safety-associated laboratory parameters were assessed at regular intervals. Organ damage (SLICC/ACR Damage Index) was assessed every 48 weeks. The study continued until belimumab was commercially available, with a subsequent 8-week follow-up period.

RESULTS

A total of 738 patients entered the extension study and 735/738 (99.6%) received one or more doses of belimumab. Annual incidence of AEs, including serious and severe AEs, remained stable or declined over time. Sixty-nine (9.4%) patients experienced an AE resulting in discontinuation of belimumab or withdrawal from the study. Eleven deaths occurred (and two during post-treatment follow-up), including one (cardiogenic shock) considered possibly related to belimumab. Laboratory parameters generally remained stable. The mean (s.d.) SLICC/ACR Damage Index score was 0.6 (1.02) at baseline (prior to the first dose of belimumab) and remained stable. At study year 8, 57/65 (87.7%) patients had no change in SLICC/ACR Damage Index score from baseline, indicating low organ damage accrual.

CONCLUSION

Belimumab displayed a stable safety profile with no new safety signals. There was minimal organ damage progression over 8 years.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, https://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00424476 (BLISS-52), NCT00410384 (BLISS-76), NCT00732940 (BEL112232), NCT00712933 (BEL112234).

Safety and Efficacy of Belimumab Plus Standard Therapy for Up to Thirteen Years in Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Objective

To investigate the long‐term safety and efficacy of intravenous (IV) belimumab plus standard of care (SOC) therapy for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in patients with active, autoantibody‐positive SLE.

Methods

The study was designed as a multicenter, open‐label, continuation study of IV belimumab given every 4 weeks in conjunction with SOC therapy in patients with SLE who completed a phase II, double‐blind study. Adverse events (AEs) and laboratory data were monitored from the first belimumab dose (in either study) until 24 weeks after the final dose. Efficacy assessments included SLE Responder Index (SRI) and flare index scores (each assessed at 16‐week intervals) and glucocorticoid use (assessed at 4‐week intervals).

Results

Of the 476 patients in the parent study, 298 (62.6%) entered the continuation study, of whom 96 (32.2%) remained in the study. Patients received belimumab for up to 13 years (median duration of exposure 3,334.0 days [range 260–4,332 days], total belimumab exposure 2,294 patient‐years, median number of infusions 115.5 [range 7–155]). The percentage of patients with AEs each year remained stable or decreased. Normal serum IgG levels were maintained in the majority of patients over the study, and the rate of infections remained stable. The percentage of patients who achieved an SRI response increased from 32.8% (year 1) to 75.6% of those remaining on treatment at year 12. The glucocorticoid dose was decreased in patients who had been receiving >7.5 mg/day at baseline.

Conclusion

This study is the longest to date to assess belimumab treatment in patients with SLE in clinical trials. Belimumab was well tolerated with no new safety concerns, and efficacy was maintained in patients who continued the study. For patients who initially exhibited a satisfactory response to belimumab, the treatment continues to be well tolerated and provides long‐term disease control.

Efficacy and Safety of Belimumab and Azathioprine for Maintenance of Remission in Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis: A Randomized Controlled Study

Objective

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of belimumab as adjunctive therapy to maintain remission in antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)–associated vasculitis (AAV).

Methods

In this multicenter, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study, patients with AAV (ages ≥18 years) were randomized 1:1 to receive azathioprine (2 mg/kg/day), low‐dose oral glucocorticoids (≤10 mg/day), and either intravenous belimumab (10 mg/kg) or placebo, following remission induction with rituximab or cyclophosphamide along with glucocorticoids. The primary end point was time to first protocol‐specified event (PSE), with first PSE defined as a Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score (BVAS) of ≥6, presence of ≥1 major BVAS item, or receipt of prohibited medications for any reason, resulting in treatment failure (adjusted for ANCA type [proteinase 3 (PR3) or myeloperoxidase (MPO)], disease stage at induction, and induction regimen). Vasculitis relapse was defined as the PSE of either a BVAS activity score of ≥6 or receipt of prohibited medications for vasculitis. Changes in treatment practice led to truncation of the study population from ~300 patients to ~100 patients.

Results

The intent‐to‐treat population totaled 105 patients with AAV, of whom 52 (40 with PR3‐ANCAs, 12 with MPO‐ANCAs) received placebo and 53 (41 with PR3‐ANCAs, 12 with MPO‐ANCAs) received belimumab; 27 of the patients were in rituximab‐induced disease remission, while 78 were in cyclophosphamide‐induced disease remission at baseline. Compared with placebo, treatment with belimumab did not reduce the risk of a PSE (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.07, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.44–2.59; P = 0.884) or vasculitis relapse (adjusted HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.29–2.65; P = 0.821). The overall rate of PSEs was low (11 [21.2%] of 52 patients receiving placebo, 10 [18.9%] of 53 patients receiving belimumab). Vasculitis relapse in the placebo group (n = 8) occurred independent of the induction regimen, disease stage, or ANCA type. All vasculitis relapses in the belimumab group (n = 6) occurred in patients who had PR3‐ANCA–associated vasculitis with cyclophosphamide‐induced disease remission. Adverse events occurred in 49 (92.5%) of 53 patients receiving belimumab and 43 (82.7%) of 52 patients receiving placebo, with no new safety concerns.

Conclusion

Belimumab plus azathioprine and glucocorticoids for the maintenance of remission in AAV did not reduce the risk of relapse.