Factors influencing older women's decision-making related to treatment of operable breast cancer: A qualitative systematic review

OBJECTIVE

There is variation in practice in the treatment of older women with breast cancer. International guidelines highlight the importance of patient autonomy in treatment decision-making. The aim of this study is to identify factors which influence decision-making in older women with operable breast cancer, which will enable us to further understand how to support these patients.

METHODS

Systematic review in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines was performed to identify factors which influence treatment decision-making in older women with operable breast cancer. Medline, Web of Science and SCOPUS were searched.

RESULTS

The search yielded 5840 results; 13 articles met the inclusion criteria and reported on a total of 1118 women. Thematic analysis identified three key themes in which decision-making factors could be categorised. These were healthcare-related factors, patient-related factors and impact of treatment. Healthcare-related factors included communication with clinicians and provision of information. Patient-related factors were age, pre-existing knowledge, preconceptions of breast cancer and treatment, decision-making style and co-morbidities. The impact of treatment considerations included body image and effect on quality of life. Decision-making style was frequently reported; older women did not demonstrate one preferred style.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings have highlighted the complex interplay of factors which influence how older women make breast cancer treatment-decisions. Clinicians should have an awareness of the factors highlighted to maximise their ability to provide support and personalised care to older women with breast cancer whilst treatment decisions are made.

Treatment and outcomes in breast cancer patients: A cross section study from the EUSOMA breast centre network

INTRODUCTION

The present study was designed to describe tumour features and treatments for patients with breast cancer. It also aimed at assessing the risk of distant metastases in relation to biological profiles, disease stages and treatment.

METHODS

Data were analysed from 81,882 patients in the EUSOMA database (disease stages at diagnosis 0-IV; median age 61 years; range 20-100 years). All patients were treated between January 2016 and December 2021 in 53 Breast Centres within the EUSOMA certification process in 13 European countries. Cases were classified as HR+ /HER2-, HR+ /HER2 + , HR-/HER2 + or HR-/HER2- and data were analysed accordingly.

RESULTS

Univariable and multivariable analyses for distant metastases were conducted on a subset of 38,119 cases with information on whether or not they had developed them. Potential determinants included sub-group type, Ki67 value, disease stage, adjuvant systemic therapies and post-operative radiation therapy. In multivariable analysis, the HR-/HER2 + and HR-/HER2- sub-groups were associated with a higher risk of distant metastases than HR+ /HER2-. Ki67 > 20 % and advanced stage disease also carried a high risk. Radiation therapy emerged as a protective factor against distant metastases.

CONCLUSIONS

Present results show a large patient database offers an information stream that can be applied to reduce uncertainties in clinical practice. Database parameters need to be updated dynamically for outcome monitoring. Molecular prognostic factors, gene-expression signatures, tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes and circulating tumoral DNA should be added.

Outcomes of complex oncoplastic breast surgery in older women. Analysis of data from the Age Gap cohort study

KEY WORDS

Breast cancer, mastectomy, breast conserving surgery, post-mastectomy reconstruction, older women, quality of life.

Oncoplastic breast surgery in older women with primary breast cancer: systematic review

BACKGROUND

Oncoplastic procedures allow excision of larger breast tumours, or unfavourable tumour/breast ratio lesions while achieving a good cosmetic outcome. This increases the pool of patients eligible for breast conservation over mastectomy, reducing the need for more extensive surgery in older women and potentially improving their quality of life. Nonetheless, studies to date suggest a poor uptake of oncoplastic breast surgery in the older group. This review aimed to establish whether a disparity in uptake of oncoplastic breast surgery exists between older and younger women, and to explore the underlying reasons for this.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted on 17 January 2022 using MEDLINE and Embase. Eligible studies comprised full-text articles of patients who underwent oncoplastic breast surgery for primary invasive breast cancer, and included those aged at least 65 years.

RESULTS

Ten published studies were identified. One study was ranked as providing level 2 evidence, and the remainder were level 3. A total of 567 women underwent oncoplastic breast surgery for primary breast cancer, of whom only 61 (10.8 per cent) were aged 65 years or older. None of the studies directly compared younger with older women, or explored the underlying factors contributing to this discrepancy in uptake.

CONCLUSION

This review has demonstrated a lower uptake of oncoplastic breast surgery in older compared with younger women. Given the increasing number of older women living with breast cancer who may be eligible for breast-conserving surgery, further research into this area is required.

Revisiting primary endocrine therapy versus surgery in older women with breast cancer: meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Old age is associated with increased co-morbidities, resulting in reduced life expectancy. Primary endocrine therapy is an alternative to primary surgical therapy for patients with breast cancer and increased co-morbidities. The aim was to review outcomes of primary endocrine therapy versus primary surgical therapy in older women with breast cancer.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase (Ovid), Scopus, and the Cochrane Library were searched systematically from January 2000 to May 2022. Single-arm studies were excluded. Primary outcomes were overall survival and breast cancer-specific survival. Secondary outcomes were local and regional failure of primary endocrine therapy, recurrence after primary surgical therapy, and health-related quality of life.

RESULTS

There were 14 studies including 14 254 patients (primary endocrine therapy 2829, 19.8 per cent; primary surgical therapy 11 425, 80.2 per cent), with the addition of four major studies (9538 patients) compared with the latest review in 2014. Seven studies defined primary surgical therapy as surgery plus adjuvant endocrine therapy, and six studies included patients with oestrogen receptor-positive tumours only. Patients in the primary endocrine therapy group were older than the primary surgical therapy group (mean difference 2.43 (95 per cent c.i. 0.73 to 4.13) years). Primary endocrine therapy led to worse overall survival than primary surgical therapy (HR 1.42, 95 per cent c.i. 1.06 to 1.91). Subgroup analysis of RCTs and prospective studies, however, showed comparable overall survival. Breast cancer-specific survival was also comparable (HR 1.28, 95 per cent c.i. 0.87 to 1.87). At 6 weeks, operated patients had significant arm symptoms and illness burden following major breast surgery compared with patients receiving primary endocrine therapy. Health-related quality of life, measured by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 and EuroQol EQ-5D-5L™, was comparable in the two treatment groups.

CONCLUSION

Overall survival was worse among older women receiving primary endocrine therapy in an analysis including all studies, but comparable in RCTs and prospective studies. This may be due to confounding by age and co-morbidities in retrospective cohort studies of primary endocrine therapy.

Immediate breast reconstruction uptake in older women with primary breast cancer: systematic review

BACKGROUND

Postmastectomy immediate breast reconstruction (PMIBR) may improve the quality of life of patients with breast cancer, of whom older women (aged 65 years or more) are a growing proportion. This study aimed to assess PMIBR in older women with regard to underlying impediments (if any).

METHODS

MEDLINE, Embase, and PubMed were searched by two independent researchers up to June 2022. Eligible studies compared PMIBR rates between younger and older women with invasive primary breast cancer.

RESULTS

A total of 10 studies (2012-2020) including 466 134 women were appraised, of whom two-thirds (313 298) were younger and one-third (152 836) older. Only 10.0 per cent of older women underwent PMIBR in contrast to 45.0 per cent of younger women. Two studies explored factors affecting uptake of PMIBR in older women; surgeon-associated (usual practice), patient-associated (socioeconomic status, ethnicity, and co-morbidities), and system-associated (insurance status and hospital location) factors were identified.

CONCLUSION

Uptake of PMIBR in older women is low with definable (and some correctable) barriers.

Improving outcomes for women aged 70 years or above with early breast cancer: research programme including a cluster RCT

Background

In breast cancer management, age-related practice variation is widespread, with older women having lower rates of surgery and chemotherapy than younger women, based on the premise of reduced treatment tolerance and benefit. This may contribute to inferior outcomes. There are currently no age- and fitness-stratified guidelines on which to base treatment recommendations.

Aim

We aimed to optimise treatment choice and outcomes for older women (aged ≥ 70 years) with operable breast cancer.

Objectives

Our objectives were to (1) determine the age, comorbidity, frailty, disease stage and biology thresholds for endocrine therapy alone versus surgery plus adjuvant endocrine therapy, or adjuvant chemotherapy versus no chemotherapy, for older women with breast cancer; (2) optimise survival outcomes for older women by improving the quality of treatment decision-making; (3) develop and evaluate a decision support intervention to enhance shared decision-making; and (4) determine the degree and causes of treatment variation between UK breast units.

Design

A prospective cohort study was used to determine age and fitness thresholds for treatment allocation. Mixed-methods research was used to determine the information needs of older women to develop a decision support intervention. A cluster-randomised trial was used to evaluate the impact of this decision support intervention on treatment choices and outcomes. Health economic analysis was used to evaluate the cost–benefit ratio of different treatment strategies according to age and fitness criteria. A mixed-methods study was used to determine the degree and causes of variation in treatment allocation.

Main outcome measures

The main outcome measures were enhanced age- and fitness-specific decision support leading to improved quality-of-life outcomes in older women (aged ≥ 70 years) with early breast cancer.

Results

(1) Cohort study: the study recruited 3416 UK women aged ≥ 70 years (median age 77 years). Follow-up was 52 months. (a) The surgery plus adjuvant endocrine therapy versus endocrine therapy alone comparison: 2854 out of 3416 (88%) women had oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer, 2354 of whom received surgery plus adjuvant endocrine therapy and 500 received endocrine therapy alone. Patients treated with endocrine therapy alone were older and frailer than patients treated with surgery plus adjuvant endocrine therapy. Unmatched overall survival and breast-cancer-specific survival were higher in the surgery plus adjuvant endocrine therapy group (overall survival: hazard ratio 0.27, 95% confidence interval 0.23 to 0.33; p < 0.001; breast-cancer-specific survival: hazard ratio 0.41, 95% confidence interval 0.29 to 0.58; p < 0.001) than in the endocrine therapy alone group. In matched analysis, surgery plus adjuvant endocrine therapy was still associated with better overall survival (hazard ratio 0.72, 95% confidence interval 0.53 to 0.98; p = 0.04) than endocrine therapy alone, but not with better breast-cancer-specific survival (hazard ratio 0.74, 95% confidence interval 0.40 to 1.37; p = 0.34) or progression-free-survival (hazard ratio 1.11, 95% confidence interval 0.55 to 2.26; p = 0.78). (b) The adjuvant chemotherapy versus no chemotherapy comparison: 2811 out of 3416 (82%) women received surgery plus adjuvant endocrine therapy, of whom 1520 (54%) had high-recurrence-risk breast cancer [grade 3, node positive, oestrogen receptor negative or human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 positive, or a high Oncotype DX® (Genomic Health, Inc., Redwood City, CA, USA) score of > 25]. In this high-risk population, there were no differences according to adjuvant chemotherapy use in overall survival or breast-cancer-specific survival after propensity matching. Adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with a lower risk of metastatic recurrence than no chemotherapy in the unmatched (adjusted hazard ratio 0.36, 95% confidence interval 0.19 to 0.68; p = 0.002) and propensity-matched patients (adjusted hazard ratio 0.43, 95% confidence interval 0.20 to 0.92; p = 0.03). Adjuvant chemotherapy improved the overall survival and breast-cancer-specific survival of patients with oestrogen-receptor-negative disease. (2) Mixed-methods research to develop a decision support intervention: an iterative process was used to develop two decision support interventions (each comprising a brief decision aid, a booklet and an online tool) specifically for older women facing treatment choices (endocrine therapy alone or surgery plus adjuvant endocrine therapy, and adjuvant chemotherapy or no chemotherapy) using several evidence sources (expert opinion, literature and patient interviews). The online tool was based on models developed using registry data from 23,842 patients and validated on an external data set of 14,526 patients. Mortality rates at 2 and 5 years differed by < 1% between predicted and observed values. (3) Cluster-randomised clinical trial of decision support tools: 46 UK breast units were randomised (intervention, n = 21; usual care, n = 25), recruiting 1339 women (intervention, n = 670; usual care, n = 669). There was no significant difference in global quality of life at 6 months post baseline (difference –0.20, 95% confidence interval –2.7 to 2.3; p = 0.90). In women offered a choice of endocrine therapy alone or surgery plus adjuvant endocrine therapy, knowledge about treatments was greater in the intervention arm than the usual care arm (94% vs. 74%; p = 0.003). Treatment choice was altered, with higher rates of endocrine therapy alone than of surgery in the intervention arm. Similarly, chemotherapy rates were lower in the intervention arm (endocrine therapy alone rate: intervention sites 21% vs. usual-care sites 15%, difference 5.5%, 95% confidence interval 1.1% to 10.0%; p = 0.02; adjuvant chemotherapy rate: intervention sites 10% vs. usual-care site 15%, difference 4.5%, 95% confidence interval 0.0% to 8.0%; p = 0.013). Survival was similar in both arms. (4) Health economic analysis: a probabilistic economic model was developed using registry and cohort study data. For most health and fitness strata, surgery plus adjuvant endocrine therapy had lower costs and returned more quality-adjusted life-years than endocrine therapy alone. However, for some women aged > 90 years, surgery plus adjuvant endocrine therapy was no longer cost-effective and generated fewer quality-adjusted life-years than endocrine therapy alone. The incremental benefit of surgery plus adjuvant endocrine therapy reduced with age and comorbidities. (5) Variation in practice: analysis of rates of surgery plus adjuvant endocrine therapy or endocrine therapy alone between the 56 breast units in the cohort study demonstrated significant variation in rates of endocrine therapy alone that persisted after adjustment for age, fitness and stage. Clinician preference was an important determinant of treatment choice.

Conclusions

This study demonstrates that, for older women with oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer, there is a cohort of women with a life expectancy of < 4 years for whom surgery plus adjuvant endocrine therapy may offer little benefit and simply have a negative impact on quality of life. The Age Gap decision tool may help make this shared decision. Similarly, although adjuvant chemotherapy offers little benefit and has a negative impact on quality of life for the majority of older women with oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer, for women with oestrogen-receptor-negative breast cancer, adjuvant chemotherapy is beneficial. The negative impacts of adjuvant chemotherapy on quality of life, although significant, are transient. This implies that, for the majority of fitter women aged ≥ 70 years, standard care should be offered.

Limitations

As with any observational study, despite detailed propensity score matching, residual bias cannot be excluded. Follow-up was at median 52 months for the cohort analysis. Longer-term follow-up will be required to validate these findings owing to the slow time course of oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer.

Future work

The online algorithm is now available (URL: https://agegap.shef.ac.uk/; accessed May 2022). There are plans to validate the tool and incorprate quality-of-life and 10-year survival outcomes.

Trial registration

This trial is registered as ISRCTN46099296.

Funding

This project was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Programme Grants for Applied Research programme and will be published in full in Programme Grants for Applied Research; Vol. 10, No. 6. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

Exploring the gender difference in relationships between narcissism, competitiveness, and mental health problems among college students

ObjectiveThe current research examined the gender difference in relationships in terms of overt and covert narcissism, hypercompetitiveness, personal development competitiveness, and mental health problems, such as anxiety, depression, and stress symptoms among college students. Participants: 195 college students (mean age = 21.55 years) in Hong Kong. Method: Participants were invited to fill in standardized psychological instruments. Results: In all, 125 (62.1%) were females. The results revealed that males had higher levels of narcissism and competitiveness than females. Narcissism was associated with competitiveness in both genders. Covert narcissism was independently and positively related with depression, anxiety, and stress in both males and females. Hypercompetitiveness was independently and positively associated with mental health problems in females, but independent associations were not found in males. Conclusions: For the well-being of college students, those with covert narcissism and females with hypercompetitiveness should be monitored closely as they are more likely to have mental health problems.

Bridging the age gap in breast cancer: impact of omission of breast cancer surgery in older women with oestrogen receptor-positive early breast cancer on quality-of-life outcomes

BACKGROUND

Primary endocrine therapy may be an alternative treatment for less fit women with oestrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer. This study compared quality-of-life (QoL) outcomes in older women treated with surgery or primary endocrine therapy.

METHODS

This was a multicentre, prospective, observational cohort study of surgery or primary endocrine therapy in women aged over 70 years with operable breast cancer. QoL was assessed using European Organisation for Research and Treatment of cancer QoL questionnaires QLQ-C30, -BR23, and -ELD14, and the EuroQol Five Dimensions 5L score at baseline, 6 weeks, and 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. Propensity score matching was used to adjust for baseline variation in health, fitness, and tumour stage.

RESULTS

The study recruited 3416 women (median age 77 (range 69-102) years) from 56 breast units. Of these, 2979 (87.2 per cent) had ER-positive breast cancer; 2354 women had surgery and 500 received primary endocrine therapy (125 were excluded from analysis due to inadequate data or non-standard therapy). Median follow-up was 52 months. The primary endocrine therapy group was older and less fit. Baseline QoL differed between the groups; the mean(s.d.) QLQ-C30 global health status score was 66.2(21.1) in patients who received primary endocrine therapy versus 77.1(17.8) among those who had surgery plus endocrine therapy. In the unmatched analysis, changes in QoL between 6 weeks and baseline were noted in several domains, but by 24 months most scores had returned to baseline levels. In the matched analysis, major surgery (mastectomy or axillary clearance) had a more pronounced adverse impact than primary endocrine therapy in several domains.

CONCLUSION

Adverse effects on QoL are seen in the first few months after surgery, but by 24 months these have largely resolved. Women considering surgery should be informed of these effects.

O14 Optimising the management of primary breast cancer in older women

Introduction

The risk of breast cancer increases with age and our global population is ageing. By 2040 the number of breast cancer cases diagnosed per year worldwide will double and over 40% of these will be in patients aged 70 or over. Despite this, there are few treatment guidelines specific to breast cancer in older women and none which consider the unique biological differences of this cohort.

Method

Surgical and core needle biopsy (CNB) specimens were obtained from an existing series of 1,785 women over the age of 70 with primary breast cancer, treated in a single institution with long-term (37+ years) follow-up. Of this cohort, 813 had primary surgical treatment. As part of previous work, it was possible to construct good quality tissue microarrays (TMAs) in 575 surgical specimens and 693 CNB specimens. Immunohistochemical staining for 32 biomarkers has been performed in all of the available TMAs. Association between histological score for each biomarker and tumour size, grade, recurrence rate, breast cancer specific and overall survival is currently being investigated in the whole cohort.

Results

Results to date have revealed a unique biological cluster in older women with primary breast cancer that is not seen in a comparative younger cohort. In the future, bioinformatics analysis will determine which biomarkers and in what combination, can predict chance of recurrence/overall survival in this cohort.

Conclusions

This information will be used to create a prognostic tool specific to assist older women with decision making regarding primary treatment of breast cancer.

Biology of primary breast cancer in older women beyond routine biomarkers

Purpose

There are numerous biomarkers which may have potential predictive and prognostic significance in breast cancer. This is extremely important in older adults, who may opt for less aggressive therapy. This work outlines the literature on biological assessment outside of standard biomarkers (defined as ER, PgR, HER2, Ki67) in women ≥ 65 years with primary operable invasive breast cancer, to determine which additional biomarkers are relevant to outcome in older women.

Methods

Medline and Embase databases were searched. Studies were eligible if included ≥ 50 patients aged ≥ 65 years; stratified results by age; measured a biomarker outside of standard assay and reported patient data.

Results

A total of 12 studies were appraised involving 5000 patients, measuring 28 biomarkers. The studies were extremely varied in methodology and outcome but three themes emerged: 1. Differences in biomarker expression between younger and older women, indicating that breast cancer in older women is generally less aggressive compared to younger women; 2. Relationship of biomarker expression with survival, suggesting biomarkers which may exclusively predict response to primary treatment in older women; 3. Association of biomarker with chemotherapy, suggesting that older patients should not be declined chemotherapy based on age alone.

Conclusion

There is evidence to support further investigation of B-cell lymphoma (BCL2), liver kinase (LK)B1, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), cytoplasmic cyclin-E, mucin (MUC)1 and cytokeratins (CKs) as potential predictive or prognostic markers in older women with breast cancer undergoing surgery. Studies exploring these biomarkers in larger cohorts and in women undergoing non-operative therapies are required.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12282-021-01266-5.

Observational cohort study in older women with early breast cancer: Use of radiation therapy and impact on health-related quality of life and mortality

BACKGROUND

Radiotherapy reduces in-breast recurrence risk in early breast cancer (EBC) in older women. This benefit may be small and should be balanced against treatment effect and holistic patient assessment. This study described treatment patterns according to fitness and impact on health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL).

METHODS

A multicentre, observational study of EBC patients aged ≥ 70 years, undergoing breast-conserving surgery (BCS) or mastectomy, was undertaken. Associations between radiotherapy use, surgery, clinico-pathological parameters, fitness based on geriatric parameters and treatment centre were determined. HRQoL was measured using the European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) questionnaires.

RESULTS

In 2013-2018 2811 women in 56 UK study centres underwent surgery with a median follow-up of 52 months. On multivariable analysis, age and tumour risk predicted radiotherapy use. Among healthier patients (based on geriatric assessments) with high-risk tumours, 534/613 (87.1%) having BCS and 185/341 (54.2%) having mastectomy received radiotherapy. In less fit individuals with low-risk tumours undergoing BCS, 149/207 (72.0%) received radiotherapy. Radiotherapy effects on HRQoL domains, including breast symptoms and fatigue were seen, resolving by 18 months.

CONCLUSION

Radiotherapy use in EBC patients ≥ 70 years is affected by age and recurrence risk, whereas geriatric parameters have limited impact regardless of type of surgery. There was geographical variation in treatment, with some fit older women with high-risk tumours not receiving radiotherapy, and some older, low-risk, EBC patients receiving radiotherapy after BCS despite evidence of limited benefit. The impact on HRQoL is transient.

Bridging The Age Gap: observational cohort study of effects of chemotherapy and trastuzumab on recurrence, survival and quality of life in older women with early breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Chemotherapy improves outcomes for high risk early breast cancer (EBC) patients but is infrequently offered to older individuals. This study determined if there are fit older patients with high-risk disease who may benefit from chemotherapy.

METHODS

A multicentre, prospective, observational study was performed to determine chemotherapy (±trastuzumab) usage and survival and quality-of-life outcomes in EBC patients aged ≥70 years. Propensity score-matching adjusted for variation in baseline age, fitness and tumour stage.

RESULTS

Three thousands four hundred sixteen women were recruited from 56 UK centres between 2013 and 2018. Two thousands eight hundred eleven (82%) had surgery. 1520/2811 (54%) had high-risk EBC and 2059/2811 (73%) were fit. Chemotherapy was given to 306/1100 (27.8%) fit patients with high-risk EBC. Unmatched comparison of chemotherapy versus no chemotherapy demonstrated reduced metastatic recurrence risk in high-risk patients(hazard ratio [HR] 0.36 [95% CI 0.19-0.68]) and in 541 age, stage and fitness-matched patients(adjusted HR 0.43 [95% CI 0.20-0.92]) but no benefit to overall survival (OS) or breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) in either group. Chemotherapy improved survival in women with oestrogen receptor (ER)-negative cancer (OS: HR 0.20 [95% CI 0.08-0.49];BCSS: HR 0.12 [95% CI 0.03-0.44]).Transient negative quality-of-life impacts were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Chemotherapy was associated with reduced risk of metastatic recurrence, but survival benefits were only seen in patients with ER-negative cancer. Quality-of-life impacts were significant but transient.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN 46099296.

The impact of breast cancer surgery on functional status in older women - A systematic review of the literature

Primary endocrine therapy as treatment of breast cancer is only recommended in older women with limited life expectancy. However, many older women opt for endocrine therapy due to concerns regarding frailty and potential decline in function after surgery. A decline in functional status after surgery is documented in some cancer types, such as colorectal, however, the full impact of breast cancer surgery is less understood. A systematic review was performed to examine the evidence for impact of breast cancer surgery on functional status in older women. PubMed and Embase databases were searched. Studies were eligible if performed within the last 10 years; included patients over the age of 65 years undergoing breast cancer surgery; included stratification of results by age; measured functional status pre-operatively and at least six months following surgery. A total of 11 studies including 12 030 women were appraised. Two studies represented level-II and nine level-IV evidence. Overall, physical activity level was negatively impacted by breast cancer surgery and this was compounded by the extent of surgery. Evidence for impact of breast cancer surgery on quality of life, fatigue and cognition, was conflicting. The possibility of decline in functional status after breast cancer surgery should be discussed in all older women considering surgery. A structured exercise program may improve the negative effects of surgery on physical activity. Further work is required in the areas of quality of life, fatigability and cognition.

Bridging the age gap in breast cancer: cluster randomized trial of two decision support interventions for older women with operable breast cancer on quality of life, survival, decision quality, and treatment choices

BACKGROUND

Rates of surgery and adjuvant therapy for breast cancer vary widely between breast units. This may contribute to differences in survival. This cluster RCT evaluated the impact of decision support interventions (DESIs) for older women with breast cancer, to ascertain whether DESIs influenced quality of life, survival, decision quality, and treatment choice.

METHODS

A multicentre cluster RCT compared the use of two DESIs against usual care in treatment decision-making in older women (aged at least ≥70 years) with breast cancer. Each DESI comprised an online algorithm, booklet, and brief decision aid to inform choices between surgery plus adjuvant endocrine therapy versus primary endocrine therapy, and adjuvant chemotherapy versus no chemotherapy. The primary outcome was quality of life. Secondary outcomes included decision quality measures, survival, and treatment choice.

RESULTS

A total of 46 breast units were randomized (21 intervention, 25 usual care), recruiting 1339 women (670 intervention, 669 usual care). There was no significant difference in global quality of life at 6 months after the baseline assessment on intention-to-treat analysis (difference -0.20, 95 per cent confidence interval (C.I.) -2.69 to 2.29; P = 0.900). In women offered a choice of primary endocrine therapy versus surgery plus endocrine therapy, knowledge about treatments was greater in the intervention arm (94 versus 74 per cent; P = 0.003). Treatment choice was altered, with a primary endocrine therapy rate among women with oestrogen receptor-positive disease of 21.0 per cent in the intervention versus 15.4 per cent in usual-care sites (difference 5.5 (95 per cent C.I. 1.1 to 10.0) per cent; P = 0.029). The chemotherapy rate was 10.3 per cent at intervention versus 14.8 per cent at usual-care sites (difference -4.5 (C.I. -8.0 to 0) per cent; P = 0.013). Survival was similar in both arms.

CONCLUSION

The use of DESIs in older women increases knowledge of breast cancer treatment options, facilitates shared decision-making, and alters treatment selection. Trial registration numbers: EudraCT 2015-004220-61 (https://eudract.ema.europa.eu/), ISRCTN46099296 (http://www.controlled-trials.com).

Observational cohort study to determine the degree and causes of variation in the rate of surgery or primary endocrine therapy in older women with operable breast cancer

BACKGROUND

In the UK there is variation in the treatment of older women with breast cancer, with up to 40% receiving primary endocrine therapy (PET), which is associated with inferior survival. Case mix and patient choice may explain some variation in practice but clinician preference may also be important.

METHODS

A multicentre prospective cohort study of women aged >70 with operable breast cancer. Patient characteristics (health status, age, tumour characteristics, treatment allocation and decision-making preference) were analysed to identify whether treatment variation persisted following case-mix adjustment. Expected case-mix adjusted surgery rates were derived by logistic regression using the variables age, co-morbidity, tumour stage and grade. Concordance between patients' preferred and actual decision-making style was assessed and associations between age, treatment and decision-making style calculated.

RESULTS

Women (median age 77, range 70-102) were recruited from 56 UK breast units between 2013 and 2018. Of 2854/3369 eligible women with oestrogen receptor positive breast cancer, 2354 were treated with surgery and 500 with PET. Unadjusted surgery rates varied between hospitals, with 23/56 units falling outside the 95% confidence intervals on funnel plots. Adjusting for case mix reduced, but did not eliminate, this variation between hospitals (10/56 units had practice outside the 95% confidence intervals). Patients treated with PET had more patient-centred decisions compared to surgical patients (42.2% vs 28.4%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates variation in treatment selection thresholds for older women with breast cancer. Health stratified guidelines on thresholds for PET would help reduce variation, although patient preference should still be respected.

Correlation between breast cancer and lifestyle within the Gulf Cooperation Council countries: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

In the six Gulf Cooperation Council countries (GCCCs), Bahrain, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates, breast cancer (BC) is the greatest cause of cancer incidence and mortality. Obesity and physical inactivity are established risk factors for BC globally and appear to be more of a problem in high income countries like the GCCCs.

AIM

To determine whether obesity and physical inactivity are associated with BC incidence in the GCCCs using the United Kingdom as a comparator.

METHODS

This systematic review was carried out according to PRISMA guidelines. A cancer registry and a statistical data search was done to identify the BC incidence over the past two decades and the prevalence of obesity and physical inactivity in the GCCCs. Additionally, a systematic search of the databases, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and PubMed between 1999 and 2019 was performed to determine whether obesity and physical inactivity are risk factors for BC in the GCCCs. All papers were critically appraised according to their research methods and were assessed for quality and risk of bias.

RESULTS

BC was the top malignancy in each GCC country. Women tended to be diagnosed with BC at a younger age than women in the United Kingdom. The greatest 10-year increase in BC incidence was seen in Saudi Arabia (54.2%), approximately seven times the rate of increase seen in the United Kingdom (7.6%). The prevalence of obesity and physical inactivity was greater in all the GCCCs in comparison to the United Kingdom. A total of 155 full studies were reviewed of which 17 were included. Of those, eight looked at the prevalence of obesity and physical inactivity in the Gulf States and nine looked at these as risk factors for BC. Only one study found an association between BC and obesity (odds ratio = 2.29). No studies looked solely at the link between physical inactivity and BC.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of obesity and physical inactivity was high within the GCCCs, but the majority of the included studies found no positive correlation between obesity or physical inactivity and BC. A high proportion of women in this study were pre-menopausal which could contribute to the negative findings.

Personalising Care in the Older Woman with Primary Breast Cancer

The incidence of breast cancer increases with age. Despite this, most research in the field is targeted at younger patients. Age-specific guidelines are not widely referred to and guidelines which allude to the older woman as an individual are based solely on conventional factors. This creates a problem for older women with primary operable breast cancer who are not fit, too frail or do not wish to have surgery. Preliminary studies have shown that older women with breast cancer have distinct biological features compared to their younger counterparts. This means that they are likely to have less aggressive cancers such as those who are oestrogen receptor-positive. Geriatric assessment (GA) has been used in clinical practice to identify patients that are suitable for certain treatments. More research on this group of patients' unique biological features and GA will help tailor personalised care for them.

Abstract P2-12-01: Dose- and exposure-response relationship and biomarker correlation analysis in breast tumors from patients treated with capivasertib, an AKT inhibitor, in the STAKT randomized, placebo controlled pre-surgical study

Background: Capivasertib (AZD5363), an AKT1,2,3 inhibitor, significantly improved progression-free and overall survival when added to paclitaxel in triple negative breast cancer (BC) patients (Schmid et al. ASCO 2018). We have previously reported in STAKT, robust target inhibition at 480mg BD versus placebo, including significant decreases in the primary biomarkers (PBs) - Ki67, pPRAS40 & pGSK3β - in primary BCs (Robertson et al. SABCS 2017). We now report the dose- and exposure-response relationship of capivasertib and the correlation between primary and secondary (pAKT, pS6, nuclear FOXO3a) tumor biomarkers.

Design: STAKT was a two-stage, double blind, randomized, placebo controlled 'window-of-opportunity' trial in newly diagnosed ER+ BC patients. Stage 1 assessed capivasertib at a dose of 480mg BD p.o. versus placebo. Stage 2 assessed capivasertib at two lower doses 360mg and 240mg BD. Tumor biopsies were taken prior to 1st dose and after 4.5 days of dosing. Evaluable patients (who required pre-defined minimum baseline PD values for PBs) included placebo (n=11), capivasertib at 480mg (n=17), 360mg (n=5) and 240mg (n=6). Blood samples for pharmacokinetic (PK) studies were scheduled at pre-dose; 2, 4, optional 6 & 8 hrs post first dose on Day 1; ˜2-4 h post last dose on Day 5 (before biopsy). The % change from baseline for PBs were evaluated against the following exposure variables (placebo=0): i) Dose, ii) Observed Cmax Day 1 (˜2h post-dose), iii) Observed plasma concentration on Day 5, iv) Model-predicted plasma concentration Day 5 at time of biopsy, and v) Model-predicted AUC on Day 5. Spearman correlation coefficient measured the strength and direction of association between biomarkers.

Results:

· Significant mean reductions in % change from baseline were observed for the PBs pGSK3β (-39%; p&lt;0.006), pPRAS40 (-50%; p&lt;0.0001) and Ki67 (-23%; p=0.052) at 480mg versus placebo. At 360mg and 240mg, mean % changes from baseline in pGSK3β were -27% and -9%, respectively; in pPRAS40 -45% and -28%, respectively; and in Ki67 0% and +22%, respectively.

· Dose-response relationships for individual % change from baseline could be described by an Emax model for all PBs. Overall, the correlation to PK exposure (observed or predicted) was similar to the correlation to dose.

· Correlation coefficient analyses between biomarkers at capivasertib 480mg BD identified- i) Positive correlations for pGSK3β with Ki67 (ρ = 0.52, p-value &lt; 0.05) & with pS6 (ρ = 0.54, p-value&lt;0.05); ii) Negative correlations between FOXO3a and Ki67 (ρ = -0.75, p-value&lt;0.001) pGSK3β (ρ = -0.71, p-value&lt;0.001) & also pS6 (ρ = -0.61, p-value&lt;0.001).Correlation coefficients for lower doses are not robust due to small sample size in these groups.

Conclusions

· Capivasertib caused dose- and concentration- dependent effects on biomarkers after only 4.5 days.

· Significant changes in the PBs were demonstrated at 480 mg BD. Biomarker changes was observed at 360mg and 240mg BD, but statistical analysis was limited by the small sample size at lower doses.

· Correlation between a number of tumor biomarkers (relative changes) were identified for capivasertib 480mg BD.

Citation Format: Gee J, Coleman RE, Cheung KL, Evans A, Holcombe C, Skene A, Rea D, Ahmed S, Jahan A, Horgan K, Rauchhaus P, Littleford R, Finlay P, Cheung A, Cullberg M, de Bruin E, Foxley A, Koulai L, Pass M, Schiavon G, Rugman P, Deb R, Robertson JFR. Dose- and exposure-response relationship and biomarker correlation analysis in breast tumors from patients treated with capivasertib, an AKT inhibitor, in the STAKT randomized, placebo controlled pre-surgical study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-12-01.

Abstract P1-12-07: Prospective 36-month follow-up to determine changes in body mass index and weight among Chinese breast cancer survivors

Background:Anticancer treatment for breast cancer has been associated with weight gain but such observation has mainly been reported in western patients. More recent data in Asian patients have inconsistent findings. Factors including socio-demographic, clinical and lifestyle may be associated with post-diagnosis weight gain. In this prospective cohort study of women with breast cancer, the objectives were to determine the body mass index (BMI) and weight changes over 36 months after initial diagnosis and the factors associated with such changes.

Methods: Chinese women with newly diagnosed early-stage breast cancer were recruited. Individual woman had her weight measured at breast cancer diagnosis (W0), at study entry (W1) and at 36-month follow-up (W2). Body height was measured at W0. We evaluated change in weight and body mass index (BMI) before and after breast cancer diagnosis.Socio-demographic, clinical and lifestyle factors were assessed to identify potential associated factors with weight changes.

Results: A total of 1133 women with breast cancer had detailed weight measurements at the 3 time-points of assessment. The mean age at diagnosis was 52 years. Fifty-four percent were premenopausal at W1. The proportion of patients with stage 0-I, II and III diseases were 35%, 46% and 19%, respectively.

The proportions of patients who were overweight and obese at the three assessment time-points were 21.2% and 28.5% at W0, 19.7% and 26.6% at W1, and 21.7% and 30.9% at W2 assessment, respectively. When compared to W0, the proportions of women who gained weight within 2-5kg at W1 and W2 were 2.4% and 20.6% respectively, that with weight gain of &gt;5kg at W1 and W2 were 0.5% and 10.0% respectively; 6.1% and 19.6% of women had weight loss &gt;2kg at W1 and W2 respectively.

Compared to W0, the median value of weight change was -0.5 kg (range: -11.4, 18.3) at W1 and 0.6 kg (range: -19.6, 20.5) at W2. On multivariate analysis, only BMI at diagnosis were significantly associated with weight change betweenassessments at diagnosis and W2; the median (range) for weight changes for women who were underweight, normal, overweight and obese were respectively 0.9 (-4.8, 7.6), 0.6 (-13.2, 20.5), 0.5 (-11.5, 13.0) and 0.5 (-19.6, 12.6) kg, p &lt;0.001.

Conclusions: In this prospective study of Chinese women with a history of breast cancer who were followed-up over a 36-months' period, the proportions of women with overweight and obese statuses were relatively stable; weight gain was uncommon among Hong Kong women with breast cancer during the same period. These findings are in contrast with studies conducted in the West, where weight gains were more commonly reported.

Funding: World Cancer Research Fund International (Grant Number WCRF 2010/249 and WCRF 2014/1197)

Citation Format: Yeo W, Lei YY, Cheng AC, Kwok CC, Cheung KL, Lee R, Lee IC, He YQ, Ho S. Prospective 36-month follow-up to determine changes in body mass index and weight among Chinese breast cancer survivors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-12-07.

Mechanisms and mitigating factors for venous thromboembolism in chronic kidney disease: the REGARDS study

Essentials Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with procoagulant and inflammatory biomarkers. We studied the association of CKD and venous thromboembolism (VTE) in a case-cohort study. Factor VIII, D-dimer and C-reactive protein appeared to explain the association of CKD and VTE. Statin use was protective against VTE in those with and without CKD.

SUMMARY

Background Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk via unknown mechanisms. Whether factors associated with reduced VTE risk in the general population might also be associated with reduced VTE risk in CKD patients is unknown. Objectives To determine whether thrombosis biomarkers attenuate VTE risk, and whether factors associated with reduced VTE risk are similarly effective in CKD patients. Methods Baseline biomarkers were measured in a cohort (294 VTE cases; 939 non-cases) from the Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) study, a nationwide prospective cohort study of 30 239 persons aged ≥45 years with 4.3 years of follow-up. The hazard ratio (HR) of VTE per 10 mL min-1 1.73 m-2 decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and the percentage attenuation of this HR by each biomarker, were calculated. Associations of protective factors (physical activity, lower body mass index [BMI], and aspirin, warfarin and statin use) with VTE were estimated in those with and without CKD. Results The HR for VTE with lower eGFR was 1.13 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-1.25), and VTE risk was attenuated by 23% (95% CI 5-100) by D-dimer, by 100% (95% CI 50-100) by factor VIII, and by 15% (95% CI 2-84) by C-reactive protein. Normal BMI was associated with lower VTE risk in those without CKD (HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.32-0.70), but not in those with CKD (HR 1.07, 95% CI 0.51-2.22). Statin use, physical activity and warfarin use were associated with lower VTE risk in both groups. Conclusions Procoagulant and inflammatory biomarkers mediated the association of eGFR with VTE. Higher physical activity, statin use and warfarin use mitigated VTE risk in those with CKD and those without CKD, but normal BMI did not mitigate VTE risk in CKD patients.