Low prevalence of abnormal cervical cytology in an institutionalized population with intellectual disability

BACKGROUND

The present study was designed to determine the prevalence of abnormal cervical cytology in an institutionalized population with intellectual disability.

METHOD

A retrospective review of charts for 162 women at a large state-owned facility was performed. Slides from 310 cervical Papanicolau smears were re-screened by a cytotechnologist and then reviewed by a pathologist.

RESULTS

The prevalence of abnormal cytology (three out of 162 participants) and biopsy confirmed that the prevalence cervical dysplasia (one out of 310 smears) was low.

CONCLUSION

The present preliminary study suggests that further investigation of the optimal interval for cervical cancer screening is warranted in this population.

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in men and women

BACKGROUND

The incidence of sudden cardiac death is roughly 3 times greater in men than in women. However, in patients treated for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, the relationships between sex and survival after adjustment for age and cardiac rhythm are unclear.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In this retrospective cohort study, we examined 7069 men and 2582 women who were treated for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Seattle and suburban King County between 1990 and 1998. We compared successful prehospital resuscitation (hospital admission) and survival from event to discharge in men and women. Women had markedly reduced rates of ventricular fibrillation (VF), slightly older age, fewer witnessed arrests, and fewer arrests in public locations than men. Although their unadjusted resuscitation rate was lower (29% versus 32%, P<0.0001), women had a greater likelihood of resuscitation than men after adjustment for VF (odds ratio [OR] 1.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03 to 1.25) and after adjustment for VF plus additional factors (OR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.14 to 1.41). The difference in resuscitation rates between men and women decreased as they aged (test for trend, P<0.0001). Unadjusted survival rates were also lower in women than in men (11% versus 15%, P<0.0001). Women had similar survival after adjustment for VF (OR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.85 to 1.11) and after adjustment for VF plus additional factors (OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.93 to 1.27).

CONCLUSIONS

The lower unadjusted resuscitation and survival rates observed in women were primarily due to women's lower incidence of VF, a relatively favorable cardiac rhythm. After adjustment for VF and other factors, women had higher resuscitation rates than men, but similar rates of survival from event to discharge.

Dispatcher-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation and survival in cardiac arrest

BACKGROUND

Early cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) improves survival in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, and dispatcher-delivered instruction in CPR can increase the proportion of arrest victims who receive bystander CPR before emergency medical service (EMS) arrival. However, little is known about the survival effectiveness of dispatcher-delivered telephone CPR instruction.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We evaluated a population-based cohort of EMS-attended adult cardiac arrests (n=7265) from 1983 through 2000 in King County, Washington, to assess the association between survival to hospital discharge and 3 distinct CPR groups: no bystander CPR before EMS arrival (no bystander CPR), bystander CPR before EMS arrival requiring dispatcher instruction (dispatcher-assisted bystander CPR), and bystander CPR before EMS arrival not requiring dispatcher instruction (bystander CPR without dispatcher assistance). In this cohort, 44.1% received no bystander CPR before EMS arrival, 25.7% received dispatcher-assisted bystander CPR, and 30.2% received bystander CPR without dispatcher assistance. Overall survival was 15.3%. Using no bystander CPR as the reference group, the multivariate adjusted odds ratio of survival was 1.45 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.21, 1.73) for dispatcher-assisted bystander CPR and 1.69 (95% CI, 1.42, 2.01) for bystander CPR without dispatcher assistance.

CONCLUSION

Dispatcher-assisted bystander CPR seems to increase survival in cardiac arrest.

Dispatcher assistance and automated external defibrillator performance among elders

OBJECTIVES

Automated external defibrillators (AEDs) provide an opportunity to improve survival in out-of-hospital, ventricular fibrillation (VF) cardiac arrest by enabling laypersons not trained in rhythm recognition to deliver lifesaving therapy. The potential role of emergency dispatchers in the layperson use of AEDs is uncertain. This study was performed to examine whether dispatcher telephone assistance affected AED skill performance during a simulated VF cardiac arrest among a cohort of older adults. The hypothesis was that dispatcher assistance would increase the proportion who were able to correctly deliver a shock, but might require additional time.

METHODS

One hundred fifty community-dwelling persons aged 58-84 years were recruited from eight senior centers in King County, Washington. All participants had received AED training approximately six months previously. For this study, the participants were randomized to AED operation with or without dispatcher assistance during a simulated VF cardiac arrest. The proportions who successfully delivered a shock and the time intervals from collapse to shock were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The participants who received dispatcher assistance were more likely to correctly deliver a shock with the AED during the simulated VF cardiac arrest (91% vs 68%, p = 0.001). Among those who were able to deliver a shock, the participants who received dispatcher assistance required a longer time interval from collapse to shock [median (25th, 75th percentile) = 193 seconds (165, 225) for dispatcher assistance, and 148 seconds (138, 166) for no dispatcher assistance, p = 0.001].

CONCLUSIONS

Among older laypersons previously trained in AED operation, dispatcher assistance may increase the proportion who can successfully deliver a shock during a VF cardiac arrest.

Training seniors in the operation of an automated external defibrillator: a randomized trial comparing two training methods

STUDY OBJECTIVE

This study evaluated the differences in efficacy of 2 methods for training seniors in the use of an automated external defibrillator (AED). We tested the hypothesis that each training method (face-to-face instruction compared with video-based instruction) would result in similar AED performance on a manikin.

METHODS

Two hundred ten seniors from various senior centers were randomized to receive face-to-face or video-based instruction on AED skills. Seniors were assessed individually and tested on the speed and quality of AED performance. We retested 177 of these initial trainees 3 months after initial training. Similar performance measures were assessed.

RESULTS

Although there were statistically significant differences between the 2 training methods in terms of average time to shock at both evaluations, the results in general demonstrate that there were no clinically meaningful distinctions (time differences of <20 seconds) between the AED performance of seniors trained with a video and seniors trained in a face-to-face setting at the initial training or at the retention assessment. At the initial evaluation, overall performance was satisfactory, with greater than 98% trained with either method delivering a shock. However, at the 3-month follow-up, almost one fourth of trainees were not able to deliver a shock, and almost half were not able to correctly place the pads on the manikin.

CONCLUSION

We believe that seniors can be trained equally well in AED performance with video-based self-instruction or face-to-face instruction. How to maintain acceptable AED performance skills over time remains a challenge.

Elevated plasma tissue plasminogen activator and anti-THP-1 antibodies are independently associated with decreased graft survival in cardiac transplant recipients

Hemostatic and immunologic factors have been implicated in future cardiac events in patients with coronary artery disease. The role of these factors and their interaction is less established in cardiac transplant recipients. We sought to characterize the role of these factors in these patients. Cardiac transplant patients who presented for surveillance coronary angiography and/or endomyocardial biopsy were eligible for enrollment. Ninety-nine consecutive patients were enrolled. Plasma levels of tissue-type plasminogen activator (t-PA), plasminogen activator inhibitor-1, von Willebrand factor, fibrin D-dimer, and anti-t-PA antibody were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. Anti-THP-1 cell antibodies directed against a monocytic leukemia cell line were detected by incubating patient plasma with THP-1 cells. Bound antibody was detected using goat peroxidase-labeled immunoglobulin G directed against human immunoglobulins. Lipids were measured by enzymatic methods. Multivariate analysis identified the presence of anti-THP-1 cell antibodies (risk ratio 4.41, p = 0.002), t-PA antigen (risk ratio 1.10, p = 0.033), donor age 20 to 26 years (risk ratio 8.83, p = 0.042), and donor age >36 years (risk ratio 15.53, p = 0.009) as predictors of allograft failure. Altered hemostatic function, as demonstrated by elevated plasma t-PA antigen levels, is predictive of subsequent allograft failure in cardiac transplant recipients. In addition, the presence of anti-THP-1 cell antibodies in these patients is predictive of allograft failure.

Barriers and facilitators to the prescription of automated external defibrillators for home use in patients with heart disease: a survey of cardiologists

OBJECTIVE

Because the majority of cardiac arrests occur at home, the use of automated external defibrillators (AEDs) in the home could potentially improve survival of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Currently, physicians must prescribe AEDs for home use by patients. The purpose of this study was to investigate the barriers and facilitators to prescription of home use of AEDs.

DESIGN

Telephone interviews were conducted with 85 cardiologists and paper and pencil surveys (via fax) with 59 additional cardiologists in Washington State.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Cardiologists were asked about their current practices and their perceived barriers and facilitators to prescription of AEDs for home use.

RESULTS

Eighty-five percent of the sample believed that AEDs could be effective in preventing death, although only 7% of the cardiologists had ever prescribed an AED. Reasons for nonprescription included the use of implantable cardioverter defibrillators, perceived lack of a clear patient niche, and lack of knowledge about the device. The majority of respondents reported that they would be more likely to prescribe AEDs if they were the standard of care (71%), were covered by insurance (67%), and came with comprehensive training (58%).

CONCLUSION

The results showed that cardiologists believe that home use of AEDs can be effective but that many issues regarding the prescription of AEDs remain.

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in octogenarians and nonagenarians

BACKGROUND

Studies of elderly patients who have out-of-hospital cardiac arrest have contradictory results. The studies usually define elderly patients as those older than 70 years, and include relatively few octogenarians and nonagenarians.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest of octogenarians, nonagenarians, and younger patients and to determine the influence of age on survival after adjusting for factors known to influence out-of-hospital cardiac arrest outcome.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study in suburban King County, Washington, on 5882 patients who had out-of-hospital cardiac arrest from presumed cardiovascular disease between January 1, 1987, and December 31, 1998, and who received cardiopulmonary resuscitation from bystanders, emergency medical technicians, or both. The main outcome measure was survival to hospital discharge.

RESULTS

In patients who had out-of-hospital cardiac arrest due to a cardiac cause, younger patients had higher hospital discharge rates than octogenarians, who in turn had higher hospital discharge rates than nonagenarians (19.4% vs 9.4% vs 4.4%; P<.001). However, survival to hospital discharge improved significantly for younger patients, octogenarians, and nonagenarians who had ventricular fibrillation or pulseless ventricular tachycardia (36% vs 24% vs 17%; P<.001). After multiple logistic regression analysis controlling for other factors, increased age was weakly associated with decreased survival to hospital discharge (odds ratio, 0.92; 95% confidence interval, 0. 85-0.99).

CONCLUSIONS

Octogenarians and nonagenarians have lower survival to hospital discharge than younger patients, but age is a much weaker predictor of survival than other factors such as initial cardiac rhythm. Decisions regarding resuscitation should not be based on age alone. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:3439-3443.

Elevated levels of plasma C-reactive protein are associated with decreased graft survival in cardiac transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Inflammation may be involved in the origin of transplant coronary artery disease. We hypothesized that plasma levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) and interleukin-6 (IL-6), markers for systemic inflammation, would correlate with cardiac transplant graft survival.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We studied 99 consecutive cardiac transplant recipients who were referred for routine endomyocardial biopsy and/or surveillance coronary angiography. Plasma levels of CRP and IL-6 were measured by their respective ELISAs. Patients were divided into 2 groups: those who died or required retransplantation and those who survived without the need for retransplantation. During the follow-up period of 5.0+/-2.7 years (range, 0.2 to 15.1 years) after transplant, 20 patients died and 9 required retransplantation. There was no significant difference in age, race, sex, cause of native myopathy, presence of diabetes, or use of aspirin, statins, or calcium channel blockers between the 2 groups. Although IL-6 did not relate to graft failure, CRP level was predictive of allograft failure (P:=0.003). The risk of allograft failure increased 36% for every 2-fold increase in CRP level. Moreover, CRP levels also correlated significantly with the frequency of grade 3 rejection (P:=0.02). In multivariate analysis, when combined with other significant predictors such as donor age and sex mismatching of the graft, CRP still significantly predicted graft failure (P:=0.025) with a 32% increase in the risk of graft failure for every 2-fold increase in CRP level.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that elevated plasma levels of CRP are associated with subsequent allograft failure in cardiac transplant recipients.

Impact of community intervention to reduce patient delay time on use of reperfusion therapy for acute myocardial infarction: rapid early action for coronary treatment (REACT) trial. REACT Study Group

BACKGROUND

Reperfusion therapy for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is a time-dependent intervention that can reduce infarct-related morbidity and mortality. Out-of-hospital patient delay from symptom onset until emergency department (ED) presentation may reduce the expected benefit of reperfusion therapy.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the impact of a community educational intervention to reduce patient delay time on the use of reperfusion therapy for AMI.

METHODS

This was a randomized, controlled community-based trial to enhance patient recognition of AMI symptoms and encourage early ED presentation with resultant increased reperfusion therapy rates for AMI. The study took place in 44 hospitals in 20 pair-matched communities in five U.S. geographic regions. Eligible study subjects were non-institutionalized patients without chest injury (aged > or =30 years) who were admitted to participating hospitals and who received a hospital discharge diagnosis of AMI (ICD 410); n = 4,885. For outcome assessment, patients were excluded if they were without survival data (n = 402), enrolled in thrombolytic trials (n = 61), receiving reperfusion therapy >12 hours after ED arrival (n = 628), or missing symptom onset or reperfusion times (n = 781). The applied intervention was an educational program targeting community organizations and the general public, high-risk patients, and health professionals in target communities. The primary outcome was a change in the proportion of AMI patients receiving early reperfusion therapy (i.e., within one hour of ED arrival or within six hours of symptom onset). Trends in reperfusion therapy rates were determined after adjustment for patient demographics, presenting blood pressure, cardiac history, and insurance status. Four-month baseline was compared with the 18-month intervention period.

RESULTS

Of 3,013 selected AMI patients, 40% received reperfusion therapy. Eighteen percent received therapy within one hour of ED arrival (46% of treated patients), and 32% within six hours of symptom onset (80% of treated patients). No significant difference in the trends in reperfusion therapy rates was attributable to the intervention, although increases in early reperfusion therapy rates were noted during the first six months of the intervention. A significant association of early reperfusion therapy use with ambulance use was identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Community-wide educational efforts to enhance patient response to AMI symptoms may not translate into sustained changes in reperfusion practices. However, an increased odds for early reperfusion therapy use during the initiation of the intervention and the association of early therapy with ambulance use suggest that reperfusion therapy rates can be enhanced.

Effect of a community intervention on patient delay and emergency medical service use in acute coronary heart disease: The Rapid Early Action for Coronary Treatment (REACT) Trial

CONTEXT

Delayed access to medical care in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is common and increases myocardial damage and mortality.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate a community intervention to reduce patient delay from symptom onset to hospital presentation and increase emergency medical service (EMS) use.

DESIGN AND SETTING

The Rapid Early Action for Coronary Treatment Trial, a randomized trial conducted from 1995 to 1997 in 20 US cities (10 matched pairs; population range, 55,777-238,912) in 10 states.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 59,944 adults aged 30 years or older presenting to hospital emergency departments (EDs) with chest pain, of whom 20,364 met the primary population criteria of suspected acute coronary heart disease on admission and were discharged with a coronary heart disease-related diagnosis.

INTERVENTION

One city in each pair was randomly assigned to an 18-month intervention that targeted mass media, community organizations, and professional, public, and patient education to increase appropriate patient actions for AMI symptoms (primary population, n=10,563). The other city in each pair was randomly assigned to reference status (primary population, n=9801).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Time from symptom onset to ED arrival and EMS use, compared between intervention and reference city pairs.

RESULTS

General population surveys provided evidence of increased public awareness and knowledge of program messages. Patient delay from symptom onset to hospital arrival at baseline (median, 140 minutes) was identical in the intervention and reference communities. Delay time decreased in intervention communities by -4.7% per year (95% confidence interval [CI], -8.6% to -0.6%), but the change did not differ significantly from that observed in reference communities (-6. 8% per year; 95% CI, -14.5% to 1.6%; P=.54). EMS use by the primary study population increased significantly in intervention communities compared with reference communities, with a net effect of 20% (95% CI, 7%-34%; P<.005). Total numbers of ED presentations for chest pain and patients with chest pain discharged from the ED, as well as EMS use among patients with chest pain released from the ED, did not change significantly.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, despite an 18-month intervention, time from symptom onset to hospital arrival for patients with chest pain did not change differentially between groups, although increased appropriate EMS use occurred in intervention communities. New strategies are needed if delay time from symptom onset to hospital presentation is to be decreased further in patients with suspected AMI. JAMA. 2000;284:60-67

Prevalence of aspirin use among patients calling 9-1-1 for chest pain

OBJECTIVE

Early aspirin administration during an acute myocardial infarction (AMI) decreases morbidity and mortality. This investigation examined the extent to which patients with a complaint of chest pain, the symptom most identified with AMI by the general population, self-administer aspirin before the arrival of emergency medical services (EMS) personnel.

METHODS

In this prospective, cross-sectional prevalence study, data were derived through the analysis of EMS incident reports for patients with a complaint of chest pain from June 1, 1997, to August 31, 1997.

RESULTS

The study included 694 subjects. One hundred two (15%) took aspirin for their chest pain before the arrival of EMS personnel. Of the 322 subjects who reported taking aspirin on a regular basis, 82 (26%) took additional aspirin for their acute chest pain. Only 20 (5%) of the 370 patients who were not using regular aspirin therapy self-administered aspirin acutely (p<0.001). In addition, patients with lower intensity of chest pain (p = 0.03) were more likely to take aspirin for their chest pain.

CONCLUSION

Only a relatively small fraction of individuals calling 9-1-1 with acute chest pain take aspirin prior to the arrival of EMS personnel. These individuals are more likely to self-administer aspirin if they are already taking it on a regular basis. It is also possible that they are less likely to take aspirin if their chest pain is more severe.

Rapid early action for coronary treatment: rationale, design, and baseline characteristics. REACT Research Group

OBJECTIVE

Early reperfusion for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) can reduce morbidity and mortality, yet there is often delay in accessing medical care after symptom onset. This report describes the design and baseline characteristics of the Rapid Early Action for Coronary Treatment (REACT) community trial, which is testing community intervention to reduce delay.

METHODS

Twenty U.S. communities were pair-matched and randomly assigned within pairs to intervention or comparison. Four months of baseline data collection was followed by an 18-month intervention of community organization and public, patient, and health professional education. Primary cases were community residents seen in the ED with chest pain, admitted with suspected acute cardiac ischemia, and discharged with a diagnosis related to coronary heart disease. The primary outcome was delay time from symptom onset to ED arrival. Secondary outcomes included delay time in patients with MI/unstable angina, hospital case-fatality rate and length of stay, receipt of reperfusion, and ED/emergency medical services utilization. Impact on public and patient knowledge, attitudes, and intentions was measured by telephone interviews. Characteristics of communities and cases and comparability of paired communities at baseline were assessed.

RESULTS

Baseline cases are 46% female, 14% minorities, and 73% aged > or =55 years, and paired communities have similar demographics characteristics. Median delay time (available for 72% of cases) is 2.3 hours and does not vary between treatment conditions (p > 0.86).

CONCLUSIONS

REACT communities approximate the demographic distribution of the United States and there is baseline comparability between the intervention and comparison groups. The REACT trial will provide valuable information for community educational programs to reduce patient delay for AMI symptoms.

Gender differences in reported symptoms for acute myocardial infarction: impact on prehospital delay time interval

A retrospective observational study using database registry of consecutive patients admitted to 16 King County hospital Coronary Care Units (CCU) was conducted to assess gender differences in symptom presentation for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and investigate how symptom presentation relates to prehospital delay time interval from acute symptom onset to emergency department (ED) presentation. Between January 1991 and February 1993, 4,497 patients were admitted to the CCUs with diagnosed AMI. Accredited record technicians abstracted age, gender, race, transport method, symptom presentation (chest pain, sweating, nausea, shortness of breath, epigastric pain, and fainting), delay time interval between acute symptom onset and presentation to hospital ED, and discharge diagnosis from the patients' medical records. After adjusting for age and history of diabetes, no gender differences remained for frequencies of chest pain, fainting, or epigastric pain. Women reported more nausea and shortness of breath but less sweating than men as symptoms of AMI. Chest pain, sweating, and fainting were associated with decreasing delay time intervals. Age, gender, histories of AMI and diabetes, and transport choice were also significantly related to delay time interval. These results show that gender differences occur in AMI symptom experience. However, how symptoms relate to the gender gap in delay time interval is not clear. These findings suggest that health care professionals need to tailor information about possible symptoms of AMI to the patient's gender, age, and medical history.

'Call fast, Call 911': a direct mail campaign to reduce patient delay in acute myocardial infarction

OBJECTIVES

A 10-month direct mail campaign was implemented to increase use of emergency medical services via 911 calls and to reduce prehospital delay for individuals experiencing acute myocardial infarction symptoms.

METHODS

This prospective, randomized, controlled trial involved three intervention groups (receiving brochures with informational, emotional, or social messages) and a control group.

RESULTS

Intervention effects were not observed except for individuals who had a history of acute myocardial infarction and who were discharged with a diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction; their 911 use was meaningfully higher in each intervention group than in the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

The mailings affected only the individuals at greatest risk.