Medulloblastoma and other neoplasms in patients with heterozygous germline SUFU variants: A scoping review

In 2002, heterozygous suppressor of fused variants (SUFU+/-) in the germline were described to have a tumor suppressor role in the development of pediatric medulloblastoma (MB). Other neoplasms associated with pathologic germline SUFU+/- variants have also been described among patients with basal cell nevus syndrome (BCNS; BCNS is also known as Gorlin syndrome, nevoid basal cell carcinoma [BCC] syndrome or Gorlin-Goltz syndrome; OMIM 109400), an autosomal-dominant cancer predisposition syndrome. The phenotype of patients with germline SUFU+/- variants is very poorly characterized due to a paucity of large studies with long-term follow-up. As such, there is a clinical need to better characterize the spectrum of neoplasms among patients with germline SUFU+/- variants so that clinicians can provide accurate counseling and optimize tumor surveillance strategies. The objective of this study is to perform a scoping review to map the evidence on the rate of medulloblastoma and to describe the spectrum of other neoplasms among patients with germline SUFU+/- variants. A review of all published literature in PubMed (MEDLINE), EMBASE, Cochrane, and Web of Science were searched from the beginning of each respective database until October 9, 2021. Studies of pediatric and adult patients with a confirmed germline SUFU+/- variant who were evaluated for the presence of any neoplasm (benign or malignant) were included. There were 176 patients (N = 30 studies) identified with a confirmed germline SUFU+/- variant who met inclusion criteria. Data were extracted from two cohort studies, two case-control studies, 18 case series, and eight case reports. The median age at diagnosis of a germline SUFU+/- variant was 4.5 years where 44.4% identified as female and 13.4% of variants were de novo. There were 34 different neoplasms (benign and malignant) documented among patients with confirmed germline SUFU+/- variants, and the most common were medulloblastoma (N = 59 patients), BCC (N = 21 patients), and meningioma (N = 19 patients). The median age at medulloblastoma diagnosis was 1.42 years (range 0.083-3; interquartile range 1.2). When data were available for these three most frequent neoplasms (N = 95 patients), 31 patients (32.6%) had neither MB, BCC nor meningioma; 51 patients (53.7%) had one of medulloblastoma or BCC or meningioma; eight patients (8.4%) had two of medulloblastoma or BCC or meningioma, and five patients (5.3%) had medulloblastoma and BCC and meningioma. This is the first study to synthesize the data on the frequency and spectrum of neoplasms specifically among patients with a confirmed germline SUFU+/- variant. This scoping review is a necessary step forward in optimizing evidence-based tumor surveillance strategies for medulloblastoma and estimating the risk of other neoplasms that could impact patient outcomes.

The Association between Mediated Deprivation and Ovarian Cancer Survival among African American Women

BACKGROUND

Deprivation indices are often used to adjust for socio-economic disparities in health studies. Their role has been partially evaluated for certain population-level cancer outcomes, but examination of their role in ovarian cancer is limited. In this study, we evaluated a range of well-recognized deprivation indices in relation to cancer survival in a cohort of self-identified Black women diagnosed with ovarian cancer. This study aimed to determine if clinical or diagnostic characteristics lie on a mediating pathway between socioeconomic status (SES) and deprivation and ovarian cancer survival in a minority population that experiences worse survival from ovarian cancer.

METHODS

We used mediation analysis to look at the direct and indirect causal effects of deprivation indices with main mediators of the SEER stage at diagnosis and residual disease. The analysis employed Bayesian structural equation models with variable selection. We applied a joint Bayesian structural model for the mediator, including a Weibull mixed model for the vital outcome with deprivation as exposure. We selected modifiers via a Monte Carlo model selection procedure.

RESULTS

The results suggest that high SES-related indices, such as Yost, Kolak urbanicity (URB), mobility (MOB) and SES dimensions, and concentrated disadvantage index (CDI), all have a significant impact on improved survival. In contrast, area deprivation index (ADI)/Singh, and area level poverty (POV) did not have a major impact. In some cases, the indirect effects have very wide credible intervals, so the total effect is not well estimated despite the estimation of the direct effect.

CONCLUSIONS

First, it is clear that commonly used indices such as Yost, or CDI both significantly impact the survival experience of Black women diagnosed with epithelial ovarian cancer. In addition, the Kolak dimension indices (URB, MOB, mixed immigrant: MICA and SES) also demonstrate a significant association, depending on the mediator. Mediation effects differ according to the mediator chosen.

Deprivation and segregation in ovarian cancer survival among African American women: a mediation analysis

PURPOSE

Deprivation and segregation indices are often examined as possible explanations for observed health disparities in population-based studies. In this study, we assessed the role of recognized deprivation and segregation indices specifically as they affect survival in a cohort of self-identified Black women diagnosed with ovarian cancer who enrolled in the African American Cancer Epidemiology Study.

METHODS

Mediation analysis was used to examine the direct and indirect effects between deprivation or segregation and overall survival via a Bayesian structural equation model with Gibbs variable selection.

RESULTS

The results suggest that high socioeconomic status-related indices have an association with increased survival, ranging from 25% to 56%. In contrast, index of concentration at the extremes-race does not have a significant impact on overall survival. In many cases, the indirect effects have very wide credible intervals; consequently, the total effect is not well estimated despite the estimation of the direct effect.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show that Black women living in higher socioeconomic status neighborhoods are associated with increased survival with ovarian cancer using area-level economic indices such as Yost or index of concentration at the extremes-income. In addition, the Kolak urbanization index has a similar impact and highlights the importance of area-level deprivation and segregation as potentially modifiable social factors in ovarian cancer survival.

Association of inflammation-related exposures and ovarian cancer survival in a multi-site cohort study of Black women

BACKGROUND

An association was observed between an inflammation-related risk score (IRRS) and worse overall survival (OS) among a cohort of mostly White women with invasive epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Herein, we evaluated the association between the IRRS and OS among Black women with EOC, a population with higher frequencies of pro-inflammatory exposures and worse survival.

METHODS

The analysis included 592 Black women diagnosed with EOC from the African American Cancer Epidemiology Study (AACES). Cox proportional hazards models were used to compute hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association of the IRRS and OS, adjusting for relevant covariates. Additional inflammation-related exposures, including the energy-adjusted Dietary Inflammatory Index (E-DIITM), were evaluated.

RESULTS

A dose-response trend was observed showing higher IRRS was associated with worse OS (per quartile HR: 1.11, 95% CI: 1.01-1.22). Adding the E-DII to the model attenuated the association of IRRS with OS, and increasing E-DII, indicating a more pro-inflammatory diet, was associated with shorter OS (per quartile HR: 1.12, 95% CI: 1.02-1.24). Scoring high on both indices was associated with shorter OS (HR: 1.54, 95% CI: 1.16-2.06).

CONCLUSION

Higher levels of inflammation-related exposures were associated with decreased EOC OS among Black women.

Integrating participant feedback and concerns to improve community and individual level chemical exposure assessment reports

BACKGROUND

As exposure assessment has shifted towards community-engaged research there has been an increasing trend towards reporting results to participants. Reports aim to increase environmental health literacy, but this can be challenging due to the many unknowns regarding chemical exposure and human health effects. This includes when reports encompass a wide-range of chemicals, limited reference or health standards exist for those chemicals, and/or incompatibility of data generated from exposure assessment tools with published reference values (e.g., comparing a wristband concentration to an oral reference dose).

METHODS

Houston Hurricane Harvey Health (Houston-3H) participants wore silicone wristbands that were analyzed for 1,530 organic compounds at two time-points surrounding Hurricane Harvey. Three focus groups were conducted in separate neighborhoods in the Houston metropolitan area to evaluate response to prototype community and individual level report-backs. Participants (n = 31) evaluated prototype drafts using Likert scales and discussion prompts. Focus groups were audio-recorded, and transcripts were analyzed using a qualitative data analysis program for common themes, and quantitative data (ranking, Likert scales) were statistically analyzed.

RESULTS

Four main themes emerged from analysis of the transcripts: (1) views on the report layout; (2) expression of concern over how chemicals might impact their individual or community health; (3) participants emotional response towards the researchers; and (4) participants ability to comprehend and evaluate environmental health information. Evaluation of the report and key concerns differed across the three focus groups. However, there was agreement amongst the focus groups about the desire to obtain personal exposure results despite the uncertainty of what the participant results meant.

CONCLUSIONS

The report-back of research results (RBRR) for community and individual level exposure assessment data should keep the following key principles in mind: materials should be accessible (language level, data visualization options, graph literacy), identify known information vs unknown (e.g., provide context for what exposure assessment data means, acknowledge lack of current health standards or guidelines), recognize and respect community knowledge and history, and set participant expectations for what they can expect from the report.

Survival of epithelial ovarian cancer in Black women: a society to cell approach in the African American cancer epidemiology study (AACES)

PURPOSE

The causes for the survival disparity among Black women with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) are likely multi-factorial. Here we describe the African American Cancer Epidemiology Study (AACES), the largest cohort of Black women with EOC.

METHODS

AACES phase 2 (enrolled 2020 onward) is a multi-site, population-based study focused on overall survival (OS) of EOC. Rapid case ascertainment is used in ongoing patient recruitment in eight U.S. states, both northern and southern. Data collection is composed of a survey, biospecimens, and medical record abstraction. Results characterizing the survival experience of the phase 1 study population (enrolled 2010-2015) are presented.

RESULTS

Thus far, ~ 650 patients with EOC have been enrolled in the AACES. The five-year OS of AACES participants approximates those of Black women in the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) registry who survive at least 10-month past diagnosis and is worse compared to white women in SEER, 49 vs. 60%, respectively. A high proportion of women in AACES have low levels of household income (45% < $25,000 annually), education (51% ≤ high school education), and insurance coverage (32% uninsured or Medicaid). Those followed annually differ from those without follow-up with higher levels of localized disease (28 vs 24%) and higher levels of optimal debulking status (73 vs 67%).

CONCLUSION

AACES is well positioned to evaluate the contribution of social determinants of health to the poor survival of Black women with EOC and advance understanding of the multi-factorial causes of the ovarian cancer survival disparity in Black women.

Determinants of exposure to endocrine disruptors following hurricane Harvey

Hurricane Harvey was a category four storm that induced catastrophic flooding in the Houston metropolitan area. Following the hurricane there was increased concern regarding chemical exposures due to damage caused by flood waters and emergency excess emissions from industrial facilities. This study utilized personal passive samplers in the form of silicone wristbands in Houston, TX to both assess chemical exposure to endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) immediately after the hurricane and determine participant characteristics associated with higher concentrations of exposure. Participants from the Houston-3H cohort (n = 172) wore a wristband for seven days and completed a questionnaire to determine various flood-related and demographic variables. Bivariate and multivariate analysis indicated that living in an area with a high Area Deprivation Index (ADI) (indicative of low socioeconomic status), identifying as Black/African American or Latino, and living in the Houston neighborhoods of Baytown and East Houston were associated with increased exposure to EDCs. These results provide evidence of racial/ethnic and socioeconomic injustices in exposure to EDCs in the Houston Metropolitan Area. Since the multiple regression models conducted did not fully explain exposure (0.047 < R2 < 0.34), more research is needed on the direct sources of EDCs within this area to create effective exposure mitigation strategies.

Aromatase inhibitors and contralateral breast cancer in BRCA mutation carriers

BACKGROUND

Deleterious BRCA mutations confer a significant lifetime risk of breast cancer (BC) as well as contralateral BC (CBC) in patients who do not undergo prophylactic mastectomy. Prior reports have suggested that tamoxifen reduces the risk of CBC in BRCA mutation carriers. Whether aromatase inhibitors (AI) have the same effect is unknown.

METHODS

This is a retrospective review of patients diagnosed with non-metastatic ER+ BC between 2004 and 2014 with known BRCA mutation status. Patients were followed from primary diagnosis until CBC diagnosis or death. Median follow-up was 11.5 years. Risk of CBC was evaluated as time to event.

RESULTS

935 subjects were included in this analysis, with 53 BRCA1 mutation carriers, and 94 BRCA2 mutation carriers. Median age at diagnosis was 42.7 years. Seventy-two percent (676) received tamoxifen and 43% (405) received AI. A total of 66 CBCs occurred, of which 10% (15/147) occurred in BRCA mutation carriers vs 6.5% (51/788) in BRCA wild type. Multivariate analyses indicated that BRCA status and AI use were significantly associated with CBC risk. AI use resulted in a significant reduction in risk of CBC (HR 0.44, p = 0.004) regardless of the BRCA mutation status. Tamoxifen use was not associated with reduced risk of CBC.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first report showing that AIs reduce the risk of CBC in BRCA mutation carriers. The potential role of AIs as chemoprevention should be validated in larger independent cohorts.

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Cancer Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic

IMPORTANCE

The full effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on cancer care disparities, particularly by race and ethnicity, remains unknown.

OBJECTIVES

To assess whether the race and ethnicity of patients with cancer was associated with disparities in cancer treatment delays, adverse social and economic effects, and concerns during the COVID-19 pandemic and to evaluate trusted sources of COVID-19 information by race and ethnicity.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This national survey study of US adults with cancer compared treatment delays, adverse social and economic effects, concerns, and trusted sources of COVID-19 information by race and ethnicity from September 1, 2020, to January 12, 2021.

EXPOSURES

The COVID-19 pandemic.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was delay in cancer treatment by race and ethnicity. Secondary outcomes were duration of delay, adverse social and economic effects, concerns, and trusted sources of COVID-19 information.

RESULTS

Of 1639 invited respondents, 1240 participated (75.7% response rate) from 50 US states, the District of Columbia, and 5 US territories (744 female respondents [60.0%]; median age, 60 years [range, 24-92 years]; 266 African American or Black [hereafter referred to as Black] respondents [21.5%]; 186 Asian respondents [15.0%]; 232 Hispanic or Latinx [hereafter referred to as Latinx] respondents [18.7%]; 29 American Indian or Alaska Native, Native Hawaiian, or multiple races [hereafter referred to as other] respondents [2.3%]; and 527 White respondents [42.5%]). Compared with White respondents, Black respondents (odds ratio [OR], 6.13 [95% CI, 3.50-10.74]) and Latinx respondents (OR, 2.77 [95% CI, 1.49-5.14]) had greater odds of involuntary treatment delays, and Black respondents had greater odds of treatment delays greater than 4 weeks (OR, 3.13 [95% CI, 1.11-8.81]). Compared with White respondents, Black respondents (OR, 4.32 [95% CI, 2.65-7.04]) and Latinx respondents (OR, 6.13 [95% CI, 3.57-10.53]) had greater odds of food insecurity and concerns regarding food security (Black respondents: OR, 2.02 [95% CI, 1.34-3.04]; Latinx respondents: OR, 2.94 [95% CI, [1.86-4.66]), financial stability (Black respondents: OR, 3.56 [95% CI, 1.79-7.08]; Latinx respondents: OR, 4.29 [95% CI, 1.98-9.29]), and affordability of cancer treatment (Black respondents: OR, 4.27 [95% CI, 2.20-8.28]; Latinx respondents: OR, 2.81 [95% CI, 1.48-5.36]). Trusted sources of COVID-19 information varied significantly by race and ethnicity.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this survey of US adults with cancer, the COVID-19 pandemic was associated with treatment delay disparities and adverse social and economic effects among Black and Latinx adults. Partnering with trusted sources may be an opportunity to overcome such disparities.

National claims data analysis of outcomes of hospitalized cancer patients without COVID-19 infection during versus prior to the COVID-19 pandemic

e18679

Background: There has been growing concern regarding the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on health care delivery and disruption of care to cancer patients. Reductions in cancer surgeries, delays in administration of life saving chemo and radiation therapies, and lower rates of cancer-related hospitalizations have been reported. While cancer patients with COVID-19 infection have poor hospitalization outcomes, less is known about the outcomes of hospitalized cancer patients without the infection. This study aimed to describe the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on outcomes of the most common cancer-related hospital admissions for patients without COVID-19 infection at a national level using insurance claims. Given the concern for disruptions in their care, we hypothesized that hospitalized cancer patients may have worse outcomes. Methods: We used the Optum Clinformatics Data Mart, consisting of claims records linked to electronic health records, including an average of 8 million adult Americans per year enrolled for at least 6 months. We identified cancer-related hospitalizations from 02/2018-05/2021 and included patients with at least of one of these cancer types: breast, prostate, bladder, ovarian, cervical, lung, colorectal, esophageal, liver, small intestine, gastric, or gallbladder cancer. Patients with cancer-related hospitalization who had COVID-19 infection were excluded. The main outcome was “severe adverse outcome” and included at least one of the following: mortality during or within 30 days of hospitalization, mechanical ventilation during hospitalization, intensive care unit admission, or discharge to hospice. We used Poisson regression to compare the number of hospitalizations before (2/1/2018-1/30/2020) and during (2/1/2020-5/30/2021) the pandemic and a Chi-squared test to compare the proportion of cancer-related hospitalizations with severe adverse outcomes over that time period in 4-month intervals and across cancer types, gender, (male vs female) and geography (the 9 Census Bureau regions). Results: There were 82,796 cancer-related hospitalizations in the period 2/2018-05/2021. A slightly higher proportion of cancer-related hospitalizations resulted in a severe adverse outcome during the pandemic as compared to prior to the pandemic (41.8% vs 40.9%; p = 0.012). There were no differences by cancer site, gender, or geography. The number of hospitalizations was lower during vs prior to the pandemic (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: The number of cancer-related hospitalizations during the pandemic was lower compared to before the, and a slightly higher proportion of those hospitalized experienced severe adverse outcomes among insured U.S. cancer patients without COVID-19 infection. The lower number of cancer-related hospitalizations during the pandemic warrants further investigation.

Breast Cancer Treatment Delay in SafetyNet Health Systems, Houston Versus Southeast Brazil

Background

Breast cancer outcomes among patients who use safety-net hospitals in the highly populated Harris County, Texas and Southeast Brazil are poor. It is unknown whether treatment delay contributes to these outcomes.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of patients with non-metastatic breast cancer diagnosed between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2011 at Harris Health Texas and Unicamp’s Women’s Hospital, Barretos Hospital, and Brazilian National Institute of Cancer, Brazil. We used Cox proportional hazards regression to evaluate association of time to treatment and risk of recurrence (ROR) or death.

Results

One thousand one hundred ninety-one patients were included. Women in Brazil were more frequently diagnosed with stage III disease (32.3% vs. 21.1% Texas; P = .002). Majority of patients in both populations had symptom-detected disease (63% in Brazil vs. 59% in Texas). Recurrence within 5 years from diagnosis was similar 21% versus 23%. Median time from diagnosis to first treatment defined as either systemic therapy (chemotherapy or endocrine therapy) or surgery, were comparable, 9.9 weeks versus 9.4 weeks. Treatment delay was not associated with increased ROR or death. Higher stage at diagnosis was associated with both increased ROR and death.

Conclusion

Time from symptoms to treatment was considerably long in both populations. Treatment delay did not affect outcomes.

Impact

Access to timely screening and diagnosis of breast cancer are priorities in these populations.

Designing Equitable, Transparent Community-Engaged Disaster Research

Disaster research faces significant infrastructure challenges: regional and federal coordination, access to resources, and community collaboration. Disasters can lead to chemical exposures that potentially impact human health and cause concern in affected communities. Community-engaged research, which incorporates local knowledge and voices, is well-suited for work with communities that experience impacts of environmental exposures following disasters. We present three examples of community-engaged disaster research (CEnDR) following oil spills, hurricanes, and wildfires, and their impact on long-term social, physical, and technical community infrastructure. We highlight the following CEnDR structures: researcher/community networks; convenient research tools; adaptable data collection modalities for equitable access; and return of data.

EPID-09. VARIATION IN GLIOMA INCIDENCE AMONG US HISPANICS BY GEOGRAPHIC REGION OF ORIGIN

BACKGROUND

Glioma incidence is 25% lower in U.S. Hispanics than in White non-Hispanics. The US Hispanic population is diverse and registry-based analyses may mask incidence differences associated with geographic/ancestral origins.

METHODS

County-level glioma incidence data in U.S. Hispanics were retrieved from the Central Brain Tumor Registry of the United States (CBTRUS), which includes data from the Centers for Disease Control’s National Program of Cancer Registries and the National Cancer Institute’s Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program and covers ~100% of the U.S. population. American Community Survey (ACS) data were used to determine county-level proportion of the Hispanic population of Mexican/Central American origin, Caribbean origin (Puerto Rican, Cuban, Dominican), or other origin. Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) were generated to assess the association of glioma incidence in Hispanics with predominant origin group.

RESULTS

Compared to Hispanics living in predominantly Caribbean-origin counties, Hispanics in predominantly Mexican/Central American-origin counties were at lower age-adjusted risk of glioma (IRR=0.83; P&lt; 0.0001), glioblastoma (IRR=0.86; P&lt; 0.0001), diffuse and anaplastic astrocytoma (IRR=0.78; P&lt; 0.0001), oligodendroglioma (IRR=0.82; P&lt; 0.0001), ependymoma (IRR=0.88; P=0.0121), and pilocytic astrocytoma (IRR=0.76; P&lt; 0.0001). Associations were consistent in children and adults, and when using more granular regions of origin. However, Central American origin was associated with modestly increased incidence of several lower-grade glioma histologies. Associations were only partially attenuated after adjusting for state-level estimated of European admixture in Hispanics using 23andMe data.

CONCLUSIONS

Glioma incidence in U.S. Hispanics differs significantly in association with the geographic origins of the Hispanic community, with those of Mexican/Central American origin at significantly reduced risk relative to those of Caribbean origin. U.S. Hispanics are culturally, socioeconomically, and genetically diverse. Although classified as a single ethnic group in most registry data, more granular analytic approaches could advance cancer epidemiology and disparities research.

The Impact of COVID-19 on Patients With Cancer: A National Study of Patient Experiences

OBJECTIVES

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic abruptly disrupted cancer care. The impact of these disruptions on patient experiences remain relatively understudied. The objective of this study was to assess patients' perspectives regarding the impact of COVID-19 on their experiences, including their cancer care, emotional and mental health, and social determinants of health, and to evaluate whether these outcomes differed by cancer stage.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a survey among adults with cancer across the United States from April 1, 2020 to August 26, 2020 using virtual snowball sampling strategy in collaboration with professional organizations, cancer care providers, and patient advocacy groups. We analyzed data using descriptive statistics, χ2 and t tests.

RESULTS

Three hundred twelve people with cancer participated and represented 38 states. The majority were non-Hispanic White (n=183; 58.7%) and female (n=177; 56.7%) with median age of 57 years. Ninety-one percent spoke English at home, 70.1% had health insurance, and 67% had access to home internet. Breast cancer was the most common diagnosis (n=67; 21.5%). Most had Stage 4 disease (n=80; 25.6%). Forty-six percent (n=145) experienced a change in their care due to COVID-19. Sixty percent (n=187) reported feeling very or extremely concerned that the pandemic would affect their cancer and disproportionately experienced among those with advanced cancer stages compared with earlier stages (P<0.001). Fifty-two percent (n=162) reported impact of COVID-19 on 1 or more aspects of social determinants of health with disproportionate impact among those with advanced cancer stages compared with earlier stages.

CONCLUSIONS

COVID-19 impacted the care and well-being of patients with cancer and this impact was more pronounced among people with advanced cancer stages. Future work should consider tailored interventions to mitigate the impact of COVID-19 on patients with cancer.

Psychosocial impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on young adult cancer survivors and parents of children with cancer

10050

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has affected oncology practice in a variety of ways. We sought to evaluate the impact on pediatric oncology parent and young adult (YA) patient experiences, concerns, and perceived stress. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional Internet-based survey of parents and YA patients in the pediatric oncology and survivorship clinics at Stanford between June-December 2020. Patients were recruited in person by clinic staff or through the electronic patient health portal. Surveys (available in English and Spanish) included the NIH Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10) and investigator-developed questions evaluating clinical practice changes, concerns about health and cancer care, and pandemic-related challenges. Bivariate analyses evaluated associations between demographic, clinical, and pandemic-related factors and (a) concern about the pandemic affecting health and cancer care, and (b) perceived stress. Results: Among 81 participants (66 parents, mean age 41.6 ± SD 9.6; 15 YAs, mean age 21.9 ± 8.4 years), 37% self-identified as Hispanic/Latino, 36% non-Hispanic white, and 21% Asian. Twenty-eight percent were on treatment and 47% had completed treatment (79% < 5 years prior). Thirty percent reported cancer-related appointment changes, largely rescheduling (75%) and/or switching to telehealth (42%). Nearly half (45%) of parents and 27% of YAs reported feeling ‘very’ or ‘extremely’ concerned about the pandemic affecting their child’s/their health or cancer care. Race/ethnicity emerged as the only demographic feature that was significantly associated with high concern (p = 0.018), with 57% of Hispanic/Latino and only 21% of non-Hispanic white respondents reporting high levels of concern. Specific concerns included fear of severe infection, immunosuppression, and whether infection would change treatment and compromise effectiveness. Parents and YAs reported ‘a lot’ or ‘a great deal’ of challenges in their personal/family life (61%) and work/professional life (48%). Among these were having less support from friends/family (35%), reduced wages/work hours (31%), and job loss (20%) with 20% reporting ≥ 3 challenges. On the PSS-10, stress in the past month was high for parents (mean 30 ± 4) and YAs (mean 31 ± 5.1) on a scale of 0-40. Risk factors for higher stress included: male gender (p = 0.028), less support from family/friends (p = 0.002), and experiencing ≥ 3 pandemic-related challenges (p = 0.013). Conclusions: Our findings confirm the prevalent worry and stress that pediatric oncology patients and families are experiencing during the COVID-19 pandemic. Better communication about cancer care service changes may help to alleviate some concerns. Supportive care resources may also help patients and families cope with psychosocial stressors, particularly among at-risk groups.

Abstract P33: Disparities in breast cancer screening and the impact of COVID-19 in Houston, Texas

Background: The third most populous county in the United States, the Harris Country, has some of the worst outcomes of breast cancer in the country. In this county, 27% of mammogram eligible women, ages 40-64 are uninsured, compared to about 11% the national average. Harris Health (HH) is a state funded network of SafetyNet hospitals and clinics that provide comprehensive care, including breast cancer screening to the uninsured and underinsured residents of the Harris county. The population who receives care at the HH sites is majority of racial and ethnic minorities and generally lower socioeconomic status than the county average. The number of screening mammograms abruptly dropped by 94% across the United States following the declaration of the COVID-19 national emergency. Currently there is no data on how breast cancer screening rates have been affected during the pandemic across Houston, and specifically in Harris County where health disparities gap already existed. We hypothesized that the population across HH sites have lower rates of screening mammograms following the COVID-19 pandemic declaration compared to the rest of the population across Houston who visit Baylor St. Luke’s Health- Texas (SLH) catchment area. Methods: We retrieved the monthly gross number of screening mammograms performed at all HH sites and SLH sites from February to October for both 2019 and 2020 on the PENRAD database. We then used the Independent-Samples Mann-Whitney U Test to assess differences in the distribution of percent change in mammogram between HH sites and SLH sites. First, we compared the total mammogram numbers for February to October (2020 vs. 2019). We then compared only the numbers for each month (e.g., May 2020 vs. May 2019). Beyond basic descriptive counts, statistical analysis was limited to mammogram among women ages 40 – 69. Statistical significance was set at p&lt;0.05. Results: Overall, across both health care systems, HH and SLH, and for all ages, there was a drastic drop (53.96%) in screening mammogram between 2019 (N=32,968) and 2020 (N=17,788). For women ages 40 – 69, the drop in screening mammogram at SLH sites during 2020 (February to October) was significantly less than the drop at HH sites during the same period. When screening mammogram was compared between 2019 and 2020 for each month separately, it was only in May and September that the % change in mammogram were similar for SLH and HH. For the remaining months, SLH site had significantly less drop in screening mammograms. Conclusion: The population that normally receives care at HH site had significantly lower rates of screening mammograms following the pandemic compared to the population who receives care at SLH sites. This will likely widen the already present disparity gap in breast cancer outcomes for the city of Houston.

Citation Format: Maryam Nemati Shafaee, Luke Gilman, Abiodun Oluyomi, Melissa Bondy, Tamara Ortiz-Perez, Chris Amos, Mothaffar Rimawi. Disparities in breast cancer screening and the impact of COVID-19 in Houston, Texas [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Virtual Meeting: COVID-19 and Cancer; 2021 Feb 3-5. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2021;27(6_Suppl):Abstract nr P33.

Transcriptome-wide Mendelian randomization study prioritising novel tissue-dependent genes for glioma susceptibility

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have discovered 27 loci associated with glioma risk. Whether these loci are causally implicated in glioma risk, and how risk differs across tissues, has yet to be systematically explored. We integrated multi-tissue expression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs) and glioma GWAS data using a combined Mendelian randomisation (MR) and colocalisation approach. We investigated how genetically predicted gene expression affects risk across tissue type (brain, estimated effective n = 1194 and whole blood, n = 31,684) and glioma subtype (all glioma (7400 cases, 8257 controls) glioblastoma (GBM, 3112 cases) and non-GBM gliomas (2411 cases)). We also leveraged tissue-specific eQTLs collected from 13 brain tissues (n = 114 to 209). The MR and colocalisation results suggested that genetically predicted increased gene expression of 12 genes were associated with glioma, GBM and/or non-GBM risk, three of which are novel glioma susceptibility genes (RETREG2/FAM134A, FAM178B and MVB12B/FAM125B). The effect of gene expression appears to be relatively consistent across glioma subtype diagnoses. Examining how risk differed across 13 brain tissues highlighted five candidate tissues (cerebellum, cortex, and the putamen, nucleus accumbens and caudate basal ganglia) and four previously implicated genes (JAK1, STMN3, PICK1 and EGFR). These analyses identified robust causal evidence for 12 genes and glioma risk, three of which are novel. The correlation of MR estimates in brain and blood are consistently low which suggested that tissue specificity needs to be carefully considered for glioma. Our results have implicated genes yet to be associated with glioma susceptibility and provided insight into putatively causal pathways for glioma risk.

Houston hurricane Harvey health (Houston-3H) study: assessment of allergic symptoms and stress after hurricane Harvey flooding

BACKGROUND

In August 2017, Hurricane Harvey caused unprecedented flooding across the greater Houston area. Given the potential for widespread flood-related exposures, including mold and sewage, and the emotional and mental toll caused by the flooding, we sought to evaluate the short- and long-term impact of flood-related exposures on the health of Houstonians. Our objectives were to assess the association of flood-related exposures with allergic symptoms and stress among Houston-area residents at two time points: within approximately 30 days (T1) and 12 months (T2) after Hurricane Harvey's landfall.

METHODS

The Houston Hurricane Harvey Health (Houston-3H) Study enrolled a total of 347 unique participants from four sites across Harris County at two times: within approximately 1-month of Harvey (T1, n = 206) and approximately 12-months after Harvey (T2, n = 266), including 125 individuals who participated at both time points. Using a self-administered questionnaire, participants reported details on demographics, flood-related exposures, and health outcomes, including allergic symptoms and stress.

RESULTS

The majority of participants reported hurricane-related flooding in their homes at T1 (79.1%) and T2 (87.2%) and experienced at least one allergic symptom after the hurricane (79.4% at T1 and 68.4% at T2). In general, flood-exposed individuals were at increased risk of upper respiratory tract allergic symptoms, reported at both the T1 and T2 time points, with exposures to dirty water and mold associated with increased risk of multiple allergic symptoms. The mean stress score of study participants at T1 was 8.0 ± 2.1 and at T2, 5.1 ± 3.2, on a 0-10 scale. Participants who experienced specific flood-related exposures reported higher stress scores when compared with their counterparts, especially 1 year after Harvey. Also, a supplementary paired-samples analysis showed that reports of wheezing, shortness of breath, and skin rash did not change between T1 and T2, though other conditions were less commonly reported at T2.

CONCLUSION

These initial Houston-3H findings demonstrate that flooding experiences that occurred as a consequence of Hurricane Harvey had lasting impacts on the health of Houstonians up to 1 year after the hurricane.

The Impact of the first COVID-19 shelter-in-place announcement on social distancing, difficulty in daily activities, and levels of concern in the San Francisco Bay Area: A cross-sectional social media survey

BACKGROUND

The U.S. has experienced an unprecedented number of orders to shelter in place throughout the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. We aimed to ascertain whether social distancing; difficulty with daily activities; and levels of concern regarding COVID-19 changed after the March 16, 2020 announcement of the nation's first shelter-in-place orders (SIPO) among individuals living in the seven affected counties in the San Francisco Bay Area.

METHODS

We conducted an online, cross-sectional social media survey from March 14 -April 1, 2020. We measured changes in social distancing behavior; experienced difficulties with daily activities (i.e., access to healthcare, childcare, obtaining essential food and medications); and level of concern regarding COVID-19 after the March 16 shelter-in-place announcement in the San Francisco Bay Area versus elsewhere in the U.S.

RESULTS

In this non-representative sample, the percentage of respondents social distancing all of the time increased following the shelter-in-place announcement in the Bay Area (9.2%, 95% CI: 6.6, 11.9) and elsewhere in the U.S. (3.4%, 95% CI: 2.0, 5.0). Respondents also reported increased difficulty obtaining hand sanitizer, medications, and in particular respondents reported increased difficulty obtaining food in the Bay Area (13.3%, 95% CI: 10.4, 16.3) and elsewhere (8.2%, 95% CI: 6.6, 9.7). We found limited evidence that level of concern regarding the COVID-19 crisis changed following the announcement.

CONCLUSION

This study characterizes early changes in attitudes, behaviors, and difficulties. As states and localities implement, rollback, and reinstate shelter-in-place orders, ongoing efforts to more fully examine the social, economic, and health impacts of COVID-19, especially among vulnerable populations, are urgently needed.

EPCO-13. GENOME-WIDE ASSOCIATION STUDY IN INDIVIDUALS OF ASHKENAZI JEWISH ANCESTRY IDENTIFIES NOVEL RISK LOCI FOR GLIOMA

Population stratification, or systematic differences in allele frequencies between subpopulations, can distort the results from genome-wide association studies (GWAS). While GWAS are usually conducted within continental (e.g. European) ancestry groups, sub-groups may have specific population histories that result in enrichment for risk or protective alleles for complex disease. In this analysis, we examined genetic risk for glioma in a US population with predominantly Ashkenazi Jewish (AJ) ancestry. Genotyping data were obtained from three prior glioma case-control studies. Best-guess assignment to one of seven subcontinental European ancestry groups was performed using AIPS (https://github.com/biomedicaldatascience/AIPS). Out of a total of 6,416 cases and 7,441 controls across all three studies, 202 cases (3% of all cases, 63% GBM) and 403 controls (5% of all controls) were assigned to the AJ ancestry group. Unconditional logistic regression was performed for by study (adjusted for age and first two principal components) and then studies were combined using fixed effects meta-analysis. No associations reached genome-wide significance (p&lt; 5x10-8), including those detected in prior pan-European GWAS. A nominally significant association was detected on chromosome 17 in ASPA (rs9904040, MAF=20%, p=2.61x10-6, Odds ratio=2.22 [95% confidence interval=1.59–3.09]) which is in linkage equilibrium (r2=0.0013) with the previously detected glioma risk SNP in TP53 (MAF=0.3% in this analysis, p=0.8801) in the European population. In our prior pan-European meta-analysis (Melin et al., 2017, this SNP was non-significant (p=0.0620). This study failed to replicate many previously identified glioma risk alleles, likely due to diminished power due to small sample size. We did identify a novel risk allele on chromosome 17 in ASPA, which encodes for aspartoacylase (which catalyzes deacylation of N-acetyl_L-aspartic acid). Larger sample sizes identified via targeted recruitment are necessary in order to fully characterize genetic risk for glioma in this population, including assessment of rare (MAF&lt; 5%) risk allele associations.

BIOM-50. GENETIC PREDISPOSITION TO LONGER TELOMERE LENGTH AND RISK OF CHILDHOOD, ADOLESCENT AND ADULT-ONSET EPENDYMOMA

INTRODUCTION

Ependymoma is the third most common brain tumor in children, with well-described molecular characterization but poorly understood underlying germline risk factors. Telomerase reactivation in somatic cells has been linked to ependymoma progression, recurrence, and survival, and has been implicated as an important prognostic marker and potential therapeutic target.

METHODS

To investigate whether inherited predisposition to longer telomere length influences ependymoma risk, we utilized case-control data from three studies: 1) a population-based pediatric and adolescent ependymoma case-control sample from California (153 cases, 696 controls), 2) a hospital-based pediatric posterior fossa type A ependymoma (EPN-PF-A) case-control study from Toronto’s Hospital for Sick Children and the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia (83 cases, 332 controls), and 3) a multicenter adult-onset ependymoma case-control dataset nested within the Glioma International Case-Control Consortium (GICC) (103 cases, 3287 controls). We investigated the individual effect of telomere-length associated SNPs on ependymoma risk, as well as the combined effect of these SNPs through polygenic score and Mendelian randomization analyses.

RESULTS

We observed an association between genetic predisposition to longer LTL and increased risk of adolescent-onset (P= 3.97x10-3) and adult-onset (P =0.042) ependymoma, but not ependymoma diagnosed in children &lt; 12 years old (P=0.21), or among the pediatric EPN-PF-A sample (P=0.59). Comparing ependymoma patients ages 12–19 to those under 12 years of age demonstrated that age significantly modified the association between longer telomere length and ependymoma risk (P=0.021).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings complement emerging literature suggesting that dysregulated telomere maintenance is important for ependymoma pathogenesis and that longer telomere length is a risk factor for various neoplasms of the peripheral and central nervous system.

Sex differences in circulating leptin as a marker of adiposity in obese or overweight adolescents with type 1 diabetes

INTRODUCTION

We aimed to test whether the serum adipokines leptin and adiponectin are more strongly associated with body fat percentage (BF%) than body mass index (BMI) in adolescents with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and overweight/obesity.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We studied all participants in the T1D Exchange Metformin Study (n=122, median age 12.9 years, range 12-19.5; 32% males; 77% non-Hispanic whites, 100% overweight or obesity; median diabetes duration 6.7 years, range 1.4-15) with a baseline serum sample where we measured leptin and adiponectin concentrations. Anthropometric, clinical, laboratory and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scan measurements were analyzed. We compared correlation coefficients between variables of interest.

RESULTS

BF% by DEXA was significantly correlated with BMI Z-score (r=0.38, p<0.0001), BMI per cent of the 95th percentile (BMI%95) (r=0.45, p<0.0001), waist circumference (r=0.46, p<0.0001), leptin (r=0.58, p<0.00001) and leptin/adiponectin ratio (r=0.36, p<0.0001), while it was not significantly correlated with absolute body weight, adiponectin or insulin dose (total or basal). BF% was significantly more strongly correlated with leptin than with BMI Z-score in the overall group (p=0.022). However, there were sex-based differences. Among the significant correlations in the overall group, BF% was most strongly associated with leptin (r=0.75) in boys (n=39) but with waist circumference (r=0.58) in girls (n=83) (all p<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Serum leptin could be used as a surrogate convenient marker of adiposity in overweight/obese adolescent boys with T1D, equivalent to BMI Z-score or BMI%95. In girls, waist circumference was the best performing marker overall, and was also strongly correlated with %BF in boys.

Abstract 2327: Genetic correlation analysis identifies glioma heritability enrichment in immune cell types and novel protective associations with auto-immune conditions

Introduction: Prior epidemiological studies in glioma have identified 25 germline risk variants, as well as risk association with exposure to ionizing radiation and protective association with history of allergies and aspirin use. In this analysis we applied LDscore regression methods, which leverages single SNP associations and known patterns of linkage disequilibrium (LD) to estimate the genetic correlation between phenotypes without bias for population structure, to confirm prior associations, and to identify novel phenotype associations for traits not previously assessed in any glioma study. We also used LDscore regression to partition heritability for glioma subtypes by immune cell type. This novel method may improve genetic prediction for glioma.

Methods: We used the summary statistics for all glioma, glioblastoma (GBM), and non-GBM from a prior meta-analysis (Melin, et al.). We obtained the summary statistics for autoimmune, and atopic traits from the GWAS catalog and UK biobank. We generated pairwise genetic correlations (rg) between these phenotypic traits using LDscore regression as implemented in LDSC, and associations were considered significant at p&lt;0.05. LDSC was also used to generate partitioned heritability using GTex (brain regions) and ImmGen (immune cell types) references sets.

Results: Heritability partitioned by immune cell type for glioma was significantly enriched in myeloid cells, natural killer cells, and t cells. We identified significant negative correlations between glioma and primary biliary cirrhosis (rg=-0.24, p=0.0190), and between celiac disease and glioblastoma only (rg=-0.31, p=0.0128), and we identified a female-specific association for rheumatoid arthritis (rg=-0.68, p=0.0225). Pleiotropic effects were identified for variants in telomere-associated regions (TERC, TERT, RTEL1) for glioma and multiple autoimmune traits.

Conclusions: This analysis identified significant enrichment for heritability for glioma in immune cell types as well as novel associations between auto-immune traits. It did not validate a genetic basis for previously identified protective effects from allergic rhinitis, suggesting that it may be more strongly influenced by the environment. Further studies are needed to confirm these associations and identify the mechanism through which increased immune activity may lower risk of glioma.

Citation Format: Quinn T. Ostrom, Jacob Edelson, Jinyoung Byun, Younghun Han, GLIOGENE Consortium, Kyle Walsh, Christopher Amos, Melissa Bondy. Genetic correlation analysis identifies glioma heritability enrichment in immune cell types and novel protective associations with auto-immune conditions [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr 2327.

Abstract 2121: Genetic correlation between lung cancer and environmental exposures

Introduction: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths. 10% of never-smokers develop lung cancer. Currently, no genetic-based lung cancer screening tool exists. As a substitute, phenotypic traits can serve as surrogate markers for lung cancer risk. Our study focuses on identifying novel phenotypes associated with lung cancer. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) are useful in elucidating complex inheritance patterns and genetic architecture. Cross-trait linkage disequilibrium score regression (LDSC) specifically allows for use of GWAS summary statistics to identify genetic correlations between phenotypes of interest. This method allows for accurate calculations of genetic correlation, as it neutralizes effects from population stratification or cryptic relatedness.

Methods: We used LDSC to (1) confirm prior phenotypic trait associations with lung cancer and to (2) identify novel associations. We measured pairwise genetic correlation (rg) and SNP heritability (h2) (the proportion of phenotypic variance observed in a population that can be explained genetically) between multiple phenotypes and lung cancer using summary statistics from the UK Biobank and OncoArray lung consortium. In addition, we conducted analysis after removal of genome regions related to smoking effects that enables us to correct the potential confounding effect in lung cancer.

Results: Significant negative genetic correlations were found to exist between lung cancer and environmental factors. Overall alcohol use was significantly correlated with lung cancers. The effect observed was split, with a positive correlation for beer and cider intake (rg = 0.2957, p = 3.936 × 10-8) and a negative correlation with wine intake (rg = -0.3281, p = 2.251 × 10-14) for overall lung. Significant correlations existed between lung cancer and health metrics. A positive correlation was found between lung cancer and increased BMI (rg = 0.1986, p = 3.57 × 10-9). This finding was consistent across other BMI related metrics and within histological subtypes of lung cancer, including for lung adenocarcinoma (rg = 0.1059, p = 3.688 × 10-3) and lung small cell carcinoma (rg = 0.2393, p = 6.463 × 10-7). In comparison, physical conditioning metrics such as cycling to work had a negative correlation with lung cancer (rg = -0.2714, p = 5.690 × 10-5). Further, negative correlations were observed between being breastfed as a baby and lung cancer (rg = -0.320, p = 1.554 × 10-6). Each of these associations maintained its significance even after the removal of smoking-related SNPs.

Conclusions: This analysis demonstrates a genetic basis for the shared genetic architecture between environmental factors and lung oncogenesis. We identify several novel associations, including a correlation between breastfeeding and lung cancer. Further studies are necessary in order to confirm these associations and investigate driving genetic mechanisms.

Citation Format: Rowland West Pettit, Jinyoung Byun, Younghun Han, Jacob Edelson, Quinn Ostrom, Kyle Walsh, Melissa Bondy, James McKay, Christopher Amos, INTEGRAL Consortium. Genetic correlation between lung cancer and environmental exposures [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr 2121.

US Public Concerns About the COVID-19 Pandemic From Results of a Survey Given via Social Media

This survey study assessed public concerns about symptoms of coronavirus disease 2019 and individual actions in response to the pandemic.