Aspirin resistance in patients with ventricular assist devices: A follow-up study

BACKGROUND

Despite combined anticoagulation therapy consisting of a vitamin K antagonist and an antiplatelet agent, thromboembolic complications often occur in patients with a left ventricular assist device (LVAD). In addition, bleeding events are also common. Resistance to antiplatelet drugs is a well-known phenomenon; however, the utilization of laboratory chemistry testing for the presence of such resistance, and then switching therapy, is controversial.

METHODS

We tested 132 patients with LVAD (HeartWare n = 57, HeartMate II n = 22, HeartMate 3 n = 53) on acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) therapy for resistance and followed them for a maximum of 7 years regarding pump thrombosis. Light transmission aggregometry (LTA) and impedance aggregometry (IPA) were performed for testing platelet function.

RESULTS

We could show that patients with ASA resistance displayed an increased risk of pump thrombosis, regardless of the test used (LTA: OR = 6.20, CI [1.86-20.64], p = 0.003; IPA: OR = 12.14, CI [3.00-49.07], p < 0.001). In patients with a HeartMate 3, we could not detect any pump thrombosis associated with aspirin resistance. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in bleeding events between patients with ASA resistance and ASA responders.

CONCLUSION

Laboratory testing of ASA resistance seems to be a good tool to detect an increased risk of pump thrombosis, at least for patients with a HeartWare or HeartMate II. The extent to which these thromboses can be prevented with a change of medication has to be investigated in further studies. No pump thrombosis was detected in patients with a HeartMate 3, and the question should be asked as to what constellation of underlying and concomitant diseases must be present to justify ASA therapy for these patients.

A multicenter evaluation of external outflow graft obstruction with a fully magnetically levitated left ventricular assist device

BACKGROUND

The HeartMate 3 (HM 3; Abbott) left ventricular assist device (LVAD) has improved hemocompatibility-related adverse outcomes. In sporadic cases, external compression of the outflow graft causing obstruction (eOGO) can result from substance accumulation between the outflow graft and its bend relief. We sought to evaluate the prevalence, course, and clinical implications of eOGO in an international study.

METHODS

A multicenter retrospective analysis of HM 3 LVADs implanted between November 2014 and April 2021 (n = 2108) was conducted across 17 cardiac centers in 8 countries. We defined eOGO as obstruction >25% in the cross-sectional area in imaging (percutaneous angiography, computed tomography, or intravascular ultrasound). The prevalence and annual incidence were calculated. Serious adverse events and outcomes (death, transplantation, or device exchange) were analyzed for eOGO cases.

RESULTS

Of 2108 patients, 62 were diagnosed with eOGO at a median LVAD support duration of 953 (interquartile range, 600-1267) days. The prevalence of eOGO was 3.0% and the incidence at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years of support was 0.6%, 2.8%, 4.0%, 5.2%, and 9.1%, respectively. Of 62 patients, 9 were observed, 27 underwent surgical revision, 15 underwent percutaneous stent implantation, 8 received a heart transplant, and 2 died before intervention. One patient underwent surgical revision and later stent implantation. The mortality with therapeutic intervention was 9/53 (17.0%).

CONCLUSIONS

Although uncommon, HM 3 LVAD-supported patients might develop eOGO with an increasing incidence after 1 year of support. Although engineering efforts to reduce this complication are under way, clinicians must maintain a focus on early detection and remain vigilant.

Fully magnetically centrifugal left ventricular assist device and long-term outcomes: the ELEVATE registry

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

HeartMate 3 (HM3) is a fully magnetically levitated continuous flow left ventricular assist device, which received CE marking in 2015. The ELEVATE Registry was initiated to collect real-world outcomes in patients treated with HM3 post-CE Mark approval.

METHODS

A total of 540 subjects implanted at 26 centres between March 2015 and February 2017 were included in this registry. Of these, 463 received the device as a primary implant (primary implant cohort, PIC), 19 as a pump exchange (pump exchange cohort), and in 58 patients, only anonymized survival data were collected (anonymized cohort, AC). Patients in the PIC contributed to the baseline demographics, survival, adverse events, quality of life (QoL) (EuroQoL-5 Dimensions-5 Levels visual analogue scale), and functional capacity (6 min walk distance) assessments, while patients in the AC contributed only to survival.

RESULTS

Primary implant cohort patients had a mean age of 56 years and were predominantly male (89%) with 48% ischaemic aetiology. The majority of subjects was designated bridge to transplant (66%) and had INTERMACS Profiles 1-3 (70%). At baseline, the subjects had poor functional capacity (104 ± 140 m) and impaired QoL (35 ± 19 points). The overall survival rate of the PIC was 63.3% and survival free of stroke was 58.1% at 5 years. Significant improvements in functional capacity and QoL were observed and maintained for 5 years (301 ± 131 m and 64 ± 20 points, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Real-world data from the ELEVATE registry demonstrate an overall survival rate for primary implants of 63.3%. In the PIC, reductions in adverse events for patients in the extended follow-up and improved QoL and functional capacity were observed at 5 years in this patient population with advanced heart failure.

Driveline infection according to driveline positioning in left ventricular assist device implant recipients

We conducted a prospective, open-labeled, clinical trial, with a two-by-two factorial design, of argon cold plasma application and two different types of driveline positioning for the prevention of driveline infection (DLI) in 80 patients with a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implant. Here, we present the results of intracorporeal loop positioning (n = 40) versus no intracorporeal loop positioning (n = 40). Patients were followed up for 1 year. According to the Driveline Expert STagINg and carE grading (DESTINE) system, a DLI was considered in case of a stage 2 or higher graded infection. During follow-up, 29 (36%) patients experienced a DLI, 16 in the group with intracorporeal loop positioning and 13 in the group with no intracorporeal loop positioning. Kaplan-Meier estimates of freedom from DLI showed no statistically significant difference between study groups during follow-up (p = 0.33). In detail, 30-day freedom from DLI was for the groups with and without intracorporeal loop positioning 92 and 92%, respectively, and 1-year freedom from DLI was 51 and 62%, respectively. In conclusion, this controlled clinical trial was unable to show a statistically significant difference in freedom from DLI during one year of follow-up in groups with or without intracorporeal loop positioning. However, larger trials have to confirm these results.

Pulmonary Vascular Resistance to Predict Right Heart Failure in Patients Undergoing Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation

Right heart failure (RHF) is associated with poor outcomes, especially in patients undergoing left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. The aim of this study was to identify predictors of RHF after LVAD implantation. Of 129 consecutive patients (mean age 56 ± 11 years, 89% male) undergoing LVAD implantation, 34 developed RHF. Compared to patients without RHF, those with RHF required longer invasive mechanical ventilation and had longer intensive care unit and hospital stays (p < 0.01). One-year all-cause mortality was significantly higher in patients with versus without RHF after LVAD implantation (29.4% vs. 1.2%; hazard ratio 35.4; 95% confidence interval 4.5-277; p < 0.001). Mortality was highest in patients with delayed RHF after initial LVAD-only implantation (66.7%). Patients who did versus did not develop RHF had significantly higher baseline pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR; 404 ± 375 vs. 234 ± 162 dyn/s/cm5; p = 0.01). PVR > 250 dyn/s/cm5 was a significant predictor of survival in patients with RHF after LVAD implantation. These data confirm the negative impact of RHF on morbidity and mortality after LVAD implantation. Preoperative PVR > 250 dyn/s/cm5 determined using invasive right heart catheterization was an independent predictor of developing RHF after LVAD implantation, and of subsequent mortality, and could be used for risk stratification in the setting for deciding between single or biventricular support strategy.

Argon Cold Plasma Use and Driveline Infection in Left Ventricular Assist Device Implant Recipients

We conducted a prospective open-labeled, clinical trial, with a two-by-two factorial design, of argon cold plasma (ACP) application and two different types of driveline positioning for the prevention of driveline infection (DLI) in patients with a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implant. Here, we present the results of ACP application versus no ACP application. Eighty patients were allocated to the control group (no preventive ACP use; n = 40) or ACP group (preventive ACP use for 30 days post-LVAD implantation; n = 40). Patients were followed up for 1 year. The secondary endpoint was survival on device. Preventive ACP use improved 30 day freedom from DLI significantly (100% vs. 85%; p = 0.012); results remained significant at 6 months (92% vs. 69%, p = 0.007) and were 55% and 60%, respectively ( p = 0.65) at 1 year follow-up. With respect to survival on device, results in the control and ACP groups did not differ significantly at 30 days (97.5% vs. 100%, respectively; p = 0.32), but tended to be lower in the control group than in the ACP group at 1 year follow-up (74% vs. 90%, respectively; p = 0.09). In conclusion, preventive ACP use was able to significantly reduce DLI both during the application period and up to 6 months after LVAD implantation.

Long-term assist device patients admitted to ICU: Tips and pitfalls

Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) therapy is well-established in the treatment of end-stage cardiac failure. Indications are bridge to transplant (BTT), bridge to candidacy (BTC), bridge to recovery (BTR), and destination therapy (DT). The durability and adverse event (AE) rate of LVADs have improved over the years. However, due to donor shortage, the duration of support in the BTT population has increased tremendously; similarly, DT patients are on the device for a long time. Consequently, the number of readmissions of long-term LVAD patients has increased. In cases of severe AEs, intensive care unit (ICU) treatment can be necessary. Infectious complications are the most common AE. Furthermore, embolic or hemorrhagic strokes can occur due to foreign surfaces, acquired von Willebrand syndrome, and anticoagulation treatment. Another consequence of the coagulative status, in combination with the continuous flow, are gastrointestinal bleeding events. Moreover, in most patients, an isolated LVAD is implanted, and this involves the risk of late right heart failure. Adjustment of pump speed and optimization of the volume status can help solve this issue. Malignant arrhythmias, pre-existing or de novo after LVAD implantation, can be a life-threatening AE. Antiarrhythmic medical therapy or ablation are potential treatment options. As for specific LVADs, the Medtronic HeartWare™ ventricular assist device (HVAD) is not manufactured and distributed currently; however, 4000 patients are still on the device. Pump thrombosis can occur, wherein thrombolytic therapy is the first-line treatment option. Additionally, the HVAD can fail to restart after controller exchange due to technical issues, and precautions must be taken. The Momentum 3 trial showed superior survival without pump exchange or disabling stroke in patients treated with the HeartMate 3^Ⓡ (HM3; Abbott, Abbott Park, IL, USA) device in comparison to the HeartMate II (HMII). However, in a few cases, a twisted graft or bio debris formation between the outflow graft and bend relief could be observed, causing outflow graft obstruction. Patients on LVADs are still heart failure patients, in many cases with comorbidities. Therefore, many situations can occur requiring ICU treatment. Ethical aspects should always be the focus when taking care of these patients.

Vitamin D deficiency and driveline infection in patients with a left ventricular assist device implant

Driveline infection is a frequent complication in recipients of durable left ventricular assist devices (LVAD), but its cause is largely unclear. Since vitamin D supplementation can reduce the risk of infections, we aimed at investigating the association of vitamin D deficiency with driveline infection. In 154 patients with continuous flow LVAD implants, we assessed 2-year risk of driveline infection according to vitamin D status (circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D < 25 nmol/L or ⩾25 nmol/L). Of the study cohort, 34% (n = 53) had 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations <25 nmol/L. Kaplan-Meir estimates of 2-year freedom from driveline infection were in the vitamin D deficient and vitamin D non-deficient groups 49.7% and 74.2%, respectively (p = 0.017). Covariate-adjusted hazard ratio of driveline infection for the vitamin D deficient versus non-deficient group was 2.51 [95% CI: 1.11-5.69; p = 0.028). Circulating concentrations of endocrine regulators of calcium and phosphorus metabolism such as parathyroid hormone, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D, and fibroblast growth factor-23 were not significantly associated with the risk of driveline infection (p-values > 0.15). In total, our data indicate that in LVAD recipients deficient vitamin D status is a predictor of driveline infection, but future studies are needed to investigate whether these associations are causal.

Identifying patients at risk: multi-centre comparison of HeartMate 3 and HeartWare left ventricular assist devices

AIMS

Since the withdrawal of HeartWare (HVAD) from the global market, there is an ongoing discussion if and which patients require prophylactically exchange for a HeartMate 3 (HM3). Therefore, it is important to study outcome differences between HVAD and HM3 patients. Because centres differ in patient selection and standard of care, we performed a propensity score (PS)-based study including centres that implanted both devices and aimed to identify which HVAD patients are at highest risk.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We performed an international multi-centre study (n = 1021) including centres that implanted HVAD and HM3. PS-matching was performed using clinical variables and the implanting centre. Survival and complications were compared. As a sensitivity analysis, PS-adjusted Cox regression was performed. Landmark analysis with conditional survival >2 years was conducted to evaluate long-term survival differences. To identify which HVAD patients may benefit from a HM3 upgrade, Cox regression using pre-operative variables and their interaction with device type was performed. Survival was significantly better for HM3 patients (P < 0.01) in 458 matched patients, with a median follow-up of 23 months. Within the matched cohort, HM3 patients had a median age of 58 years, and 83% were male, 80% of the HVAD patients were male, with a median age of 59 years. PS-adjusted Cox regression confirmed a significantly better survival for HM3 patients when compared with HVAD, with a HR of 1.46 (95% confidence interval 1.14-1.85, P < 0.01). Pump thrombosis (P < 0.01) and ischaemic stroke (P < 0.01) occurred less in HM3 patients. No difference was found for haemorrhagic stroke, right heart failure, driveline infection, and major bleeding. Landmark-analysis confirmed a significant difference in conditional survival >2 years after implantation (P = 0.03). None of the pre-operative variable interactions in the Cox regression were significant.

CONCLUSIONS

HM3 patients have a significantly better survival and a lower incidence of ischaemic strokes and pump thrombosis than HVAD patients. This survival difference persisted after 2 years of implantation. Additional research using post-operative variables is warranted to identify which HVAD patients need an upgrade to HM3 or expedited transplantation.

The Role of Daily Implant-Based Multiparametric Telemonitoring in Patients with a Ventricular Assist Device

The telemonitoring of heart failure (HF) patients is becoming increasingly important. This study aimed to evaluate the benefit of telemonitoring in end-stage HF patients with a ventricular-assistance device (VAD). A total of 26 HF-patients (66 ± 11 years, 88% male) on VAD therapy with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) or a cardiac resynchronization defibrillator (CRT-D) including telemonitoring function were enrolled. The long-term follow-up data (4.10 ± 2.58 years) were assessed. All the patients (n = 26, 100%) received daily ICD/CRT-D telemonitoring. In most of the patients (73%, n = 19), the telemedical center had to take action for a mean of three times. An acute alert due to sustained ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) occurred in 12 patients (63%) with 50% of them (n = 6) requiring ICD shock delivery. Eight patients (67%) were hospitalized due to symptomatic VAs. In 11 patients (92%), immediate medication adjustments were recommended. Relevant lead issues were revealed in thirteen patients (50%), with six patients (46%) undergoing consecutive lead revisions. Most of the events (83%) were detected within 24 h. Daily telemonitoring significantly reduced the number of in-hospital device controls by 44% (p < 0.01). The telemonitoring ensured that cardiac arrhythmias and device/lead problems were identified early, allowing pre-emptive and prompt interventions. In addition, the telemonitoring significantly reduced the number of in-hospital device controls in this cohort of HF patients.

Noninvasive evaluation of the hemodynamic status in patients after heart transplantation or left ventricular assist device implantation

INTRODUCTION

Hemodynamic assessment is crucial after heart transplantation (HTX) or left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. Gold-standard is invasive assessment via thermodilution (TD). Noninvasive pulse contour analysis (NPCA) is a new technology that is supposed to determine hemodynamics completely noninvasive. We aimed to validate this technology in HTX and LVAD patients and conducted a prospective single-center cohort study.

METHODS

Patients after HTX or LVAD implantation underwent right heart catheterization including TD. NPCA using the CNAP Monitor (V.5.2.14; CNSystems Medizintechnik AG, Graz, Austria) was performed simultaneously. Three TD measurements were compared with simultaneous NPCA measurements for hemodynamic assessment. To describe the agreement between TD and NPCA, Bland-Altman analysis was done.

RESULTS

In total, 28 patients were prospectively enrolled (HTX: n = 10, LVAD: n = 18). Bland-Altman analysis revealed a mean bias of +1.05 l/min (limits of agreement ± 4.09 l/min, percentage error 62.1%) for cardiac output (CO). In LVAD patients, no adequate NPCA signal could be obtained. In 5 patients (27.8%), any NPCA signal could be detected, but was considered as low signal quality.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, according to our limited data in a small cohort of HTX and LVAD patients, NPCA using the CNAP Monitor seems not to be suitable for noninvasive evaluation of the hemodynamic status.

Pre-operative risk factors for driveline infection in left ventricular-assist device patients

AIMS

Implantation of left ventricular-assist devices (LVAD) to treat end-stage heart failure is of increasing relevance due to donor shortage. Infections of the driveline are common adverse events. LVAD infections can lead to high urgency listings for transplantation. However, transplantation in patients with infection leads to worse post-transplantation outcomes. This study aims to evaluate specific risk factors for driveline infections at the time of implantation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Four hundred forty-one patients receiving either Heartmate II or Heartware system from August 2009 to October 2013 were assessed. An expert committee sorted patients into four different groups concerning the likeliness of infection. Twenty-eight (6%) of discussed infection cases were judged as secured, 33 (7%) as likely, 18 (4%) as possible, and 20 (4%) as unlikely. The remaining 342 (78%) subjects showed either no signs of infection at all times (329 [75%]) or developed signs of infection in a second observation period within 1 year after ending of the first observation period (13 [3%]). For a better discriminatory power, cases of secured and likely infections were tested against the group with no infection at all times in a Cox proportional hazard model. Among all variables tested by univariate analysis (significance level P < 0.15), only age (P = 0.07), LVAD-type (P = 0.12), need for another thoracic operation (P = 0.02), and serum creatinine value (P = 0.02) reached statistical significance. These were subsequently subjected to multivariate analysis to calculate the cumulative risk of developing a drive infection. The multivariate analysis showed that of all the potential risk factors tested, only the necessity of re-thoracotomy or secondary thoracic closure had a significant, protective effect (hazard ratio [95% CI] = 0.45 [0.21-0.95]; P = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

This single-centre cohort study shows that driveline infections are common adverse events. The duration of support represents the major risk factor for LVAD driveline infections.

Use of the CytoSorb® filter for elimination of residual therapeutic argatroban concentrations during heparinized cardiopulmonary bypass for heart transplantation

INTRODUCTION

No antidote or established extracorporeal elimination strategy is available for argatroban. Hemadsorption facilitates elimination of smaller drugs.

CASE REPORT

A 34-year-old patient underwent urgent heart transplantation. Because of a history of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, preoperative anticoagulation was performed with argatroban. Despite ceasing of the continuous infusion of argatroban 2 h before surgery, concentration only declined from 0.60 μg/ml to 0.58 μg/ml before surgery, and the activated clotting time (ACT) value shortly was 223 s. Microvascular bleeding had been observed when starting surgery. A CytoSorb® absorption column was integrated into the system of the heparin-anticoagulated cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) circuit and a flow of 400 mL/min provided during the 2 h of extracorporeal circulation. The argatroban concentration after weaning from CPB was 0.04 μg/ml and satisfying hemostasis had been achieved after protamine administration.

CONCLUSION

Data indicate that the CytoSorb® absorption column might be an effective tool for quick extracorporeal removal of therapeutic concentrations of argatroban.

Bacteriophage-Enriched Galenic for Intrapericardial Ventricular Assist Device Infection

We report a case of severe outflow graft infection following left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. A 51-year old male LVAD patient was readmitted to our hospital presenting signs of systemic infection. One year previously, LVAD implantation (HeartMate3, Abbott, Chicago, IL, USA) with concomitant patent foramen ovale closure had been performed in the context of end-stage heart failure due to dilative cardiomyopathy (INTERMACS III). The indication for LVAD-therapy was bridge-to-candidacy, since the patient did not instantly fulfill all criteria for cardiac transplantation. At admission, a PET-CT scan unveiled fluid accumulation, encircling the outflow-graft prosthesis (SUVmax 10.5) with contrast-enhancement involving the intrathoracic driveline (SUVmax 11.2). Since cardiac transplantation was not feasible, the patient underwent surgical revision. In the first step, redo sternotomy was performed with local debridement, including jet lavage. Intraoperative swabs confirmed bacterial infection with staphylococcus aureus. Following this, the patient underwent negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) with instillation using the V.A.C. VERAFLO system (KCI-3M, San Antonio, TX, USA) for a total of 19 days. Due to the severity of infection, local bacteriophage application was performed within the wound closure. In order to concentrate phage therapy at the infection site, phages were applied using a novel semi-fluid galenic. After wound closure, the patient was discharged with an uneventful course. A control PET-CT scan 3 months after discharge showed a significant decrease in infection (outflow graft: SUVmax 7.2, intrathoracic driveline: SUVmax 3.0) correlated with contrast enhancement. Bacterial infection of intrathoracic VAD components represents a severe and potentially life-threatening complication. If cardiac transplantation is not feasible, complex wound management strategies are required. Local bacteriophage therapy might be a promising addition to already established therapeutical options. In order to improve bacteriophage retention at the wound site, application of a viscous galenic might be beneficial.

The HeartWare Ventricular Assist Device (HVAD): A Single Institutional 10-Year Experience

OBJECTIVES

 The aim of this study was to analyze our 10-year experience with the HVAD in a real-world scenario in a high-volume German heart center.

METHODS

 We retrospectively analyzed outcomes of adults (≥18 years) with terminal heart failure (HF), who underwent HVAD implantation for durable LVAD therapy in our center between October 2009 and March 2020. Primary and secondary end points were all-cause death after implantation and LVAD-associated complications, respectively. We focused the distinct analyses on risk profiles at the time of implantation and implant strategies, i.e., bridge-to-transplant (BTT) or destination therapy (DT).

RESULTS

 A total of 510 patients were included, with 229 and 281 individuals in Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) level 1 (45%) and 2 to 4, respectively. Median follow-up was 26 months (IQR: 5-54 months). Overall survival at 1, 3, and 5 years after HVAD implantation was 66% (95% CI; 61.7-70%), 49.4% (95% CI; 44.9-53.8%), and 37.4% (95% CI; 32.8-42%), not censored for LVAD exchange, LVAD explantation, or heart transplantation. INTERMACS level 1 and peri-operative temporary right heart assistance were independent risk factors for survival. Survival was best in BTT patients undergoing heart transplantation at any time during follow-up. The INTERMACS level at time of HVAD implantation did not affect survival after heart transplantation. Freedom from the combined end point of any device-associated severe complication and death was 44.5% (95% CI; 40-48.8%) at 1-year after implantation.

CONCLUSION

 The HVAD is a reliable pump for durable mechanical circulatory support even in high-risk patients. Still, heart transplantation outperforms durable MCS therapy for a superior long-term survival.

Left ventricular unloading during extracorporeal life support for myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock: surgical venting versus Impella device

OBJECTIVES

Patients in cardiogenic shock supported with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) may experience severe complications from reduced left ventricular (LV) unloading and increased cardiac afterload. These effects are usually modified by adding a percutaneous direct Impella vent or surgical LV vent on top of VA-ECMO in selected patients. However, direct comparisons between 2 LV unloading strategies in patients with cardiogenic shock due to myocardial infarction are lacking. Therefore, we sought to investigate the impact of these 2 different approaches.

METHODS

We enrolled 112 patients treated with an Impella or surgical LV vent during VA-ECMO support between January 2014 and February 2020. The primary endpoint was 30-day mortality. Secondary endpoints included rates of myocardial recovery or transition to durable mechanical circulatory support. Additionally, we assessed adverse events such as peripheral ischaemic complications requiring intervention, sepsis and ischaemic stroke.

RESULTS

At 30 days, 38 patients in the Impella group (54%) and 26 patients in the surgical LV vent group (63%) had died (relative risk with Impella 0.78, 95% confidence interval 0.47-1.30; P = 0.35). Impella group and the surgical LV vent group differed significantly with respect to the secondary end points including rates of myocardial recovery (24% and 7%, respectively; P = 0.022) and rates of durable mechanical circulatory support (17% and 42%, P = 0.012). Complication rates were not statistically different between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of Impella device as therapeutic unloading therapy during VA-ECMO did not significantly reduce 30-day mortality compared to surgical LV vent in patients with cardiogenic shock due to acute myocardial infarction.