A Randomized Controlled Trial of Home-Based Virtual Rehabilitation to Improve Adherence to Prescribed Home Therapy after Burn Injury: A Northwest Regional Burn Model System Trial

Daily rehabilitation after burn injury is vital for prevention of function-limiting contractures. However, adherence to prescribed therapy following acute burn hospitalization has historically been low and not well-studied. Studies involving virtual reality technology have demonstrated an association with improved functional outcomes in burn therapy. We conducted a five-year randomized controlled trial comparing 12 weeks of a home-based virtual rehabilitation (HBVR) system with standard burn therapy. Our primary outcome was adherence to prescribed home therapy, measured by e-diary self-report. Secondary outcomes included steps walked daily and patient-reported outcomes regarding stiffness, upper extremity function, and mobility. We enrolled 50 subjects, of which 48 provided data for analysis (23 HBVR, 25 control). Overall adherence to prescribed home therapy was low, 37.2% in the HBVR group and 60.0% in the control group. Reasons for non-adherence in the HBVR group included lack of time, engagement, and replacement of therapy with other physical activity. However, some subjects enjoyed HBVR and believed it aided their recovery. There was no difference in daily steps walked between the two groups. Daily walking gradually improved from 3,500 steps per day in the first week after baseline and plateaued at 6,000 steps per day at week five. There were no differences in stiffness, upper extremity function, and mobility between the two groups at baseline and 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up. Subjects demonstrated improved upper extremity function and mobility in the first year after discharge that coincided with increasing stiffness.

An executive summary of the National Trauma Research Action Plan

ABSTRACT

The National Trauma Research Action Plan project successfully engaged multidisciplinary experts to define opportunities to advance trauma research and has fulfilled the recommendations related to trauma research from the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine report. These panels identified more than 4,800 gaps in our knowledge regarding injury prevention and the optimal care of injured patients and laid out a priority framework and tools to support researchers to advance this field. Trauma research funding agencies and researchers can use this executive summary and supporting manuscripts to strategically address and close the highest priority research gaps. Given that this is the most significant public health threat facing our children, young adults, and military service personnel, we must do better in prioritizing these research projects for funding and providing grant support to advance this work. Through the Coalition for National Trauma Research, the trauma community is committed to a coordinated, collaborative approach to address these critical knowledge gaps and ultimately reduce the burden of morbidity and mortality faced by our patients.

Accuracy of remote burn scar evaluation via live video-conferencing technology

OBJECTIVE

Telemedicine in outpatient burn care, particularly in burn scar management, may provide cost-effective care and comes highly rated by patients. However, an effective scar scale using both video and photographic elements has not been validated. The purpose of this study is to test the reliability of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) using live video-conferencing.

METHODS

A prospective study was conducted with individuals with healed burn scars in Kathmandu, Nepal. Three independent observers assessed 85 burn scars from 17 subjects, using the Observer portion to evaluate vascularity, pigmentation, thickness, relief, pliability, surface area, and overall opinion. The on-site observer was physically present with the subjects and used a live videoconferencing application to show the scars to two remote observers in the United States. Subjects used the Patient portion to evaluate the scar that they believed appeared the worst appearance and had the greatest impact on function.

RESULTS

The single-rater reliability of the Observer scale was acceptable (ICC>0.70) in overall opinion, thickness, pliability, and surface area. The average-rater reliability for three observers was acceptable (ICC>0.70) for all parameters except for vascularity. When comparing Patients' and Observers' overall opinion scores, patients consistently reported worse opinion.

CONCLUSIONS

Evaluation of burn scars using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale can be accurately performed via live videoconferencing and presents an opportunity to expand access to burn care to rural communities, particularly in low- and middle-income countries, where patients face significant access barriers to appropriate follow-up care.

Experiences of Alaska Native people living with burn injury and opportunities for health system strengthening

BACKGROUND

Injuries are a leading cause of death and disability for Alaska Native (AN) people. Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium (ANTHC) is supporting the development of a burn care system that includes a partnership between Alaska Native Medical Center (ANMC) in Anchorage, AK and UW Medicine Regional Burn Center at Harborview Medical Center (HMC) in Seattle, WA. We aimed to better understand the experiences of AN people with burn injuries across the care continuum to aid development of culturally appropriate care regionalization.

METHODS

We performed focus groups with twelve AN people with burn injury and their caregivers. A multidisciplinary team of burn care providers, qualitative research experts, AN care coordinator, and AN cultural liaison led focus groups to elicit experiences across the burn care continuum. Transcripts were analyzed using a phenomenological approach and inductive coding to understand how AN people and families navigated the medical and community systems for burn care and areas for improvement.

RESULTS

Three themes were identified: 1-Challenges with local burn care in remote communities including limited first aid, triage, pain management, and wound care, as well as long-distance transport to definitive care; 2-Divergence between cultural values and medical practices that generated mistrust in the medical system, isolation from their support systems, and recovery goals that were not aligned with their needs; 3-Difficulty accessing emotional health support and a survivor community that could empower their resilience.

CONCLUSION

Participants reported modifiable barriers to culturally competent treatment for burn injuries among AN people. The findings can inform initiatives that leverage existing resources, including expansion of the Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes (ECHO) telementoring program, promulgation of the Phoenix Society Survivors Offering Assistance in Recovery (SOAR) to AK, coordination of regionalized care to reduce time away from AK and provide more comfortable community reintegration, and define rehabilitation goals in terms that align with personal goals and subsistence lifestyle skills. Long-distance transport times are non-modifiable, but better pre-hospital care could be achieved by harnessing existing telehealth services and adapting principles of prolonged field care to allow for triage, initial care, and resuscitation in remote environments.

Preliminary Exploration of Long-Term Patient Outcomes After Tracheostomy in Burns: A Burn Model System Study

INTRODUCTION

Upper airway management is crucial to burn care. Endotracheal intubation is often performed in the setting of inhalation injury, burns of the face and neck, or large burns requiring significant resuscitation. Tracheostomy may be necessary in patients requiring prolonged ventilatory support. This study compares long-term, patient-reported outcomes in burn patients with and without tracheostomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data from the Burn Model System Database, collected from 2013 to 2020, were analyzed. Demographic and clinical data were compared between those with and without tracheostomy. The following patient-reported outcomes, collected at 6-, 12-, and 24-mo follow-up, were analyzed: Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey (VR-12), Satisfaction with Life, Community Integration Questionnaire, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System 29-Item Profile Measure, employment status, and days to return to work. Regression models and propensity-matched analyses were used to assess the associations between tracheostomy and each outcome.

RESULTS

Of 714 patients included in this study, 5.5% received a tracheostomy. Mixed model regression analyses demonstrated that only VR-12 Physical Component Summary scores at 24-mo follow-up were significantly worse among those requiring tracheostomy. Tracheostomy was not associated with VR-12 Mental Component Summary, Satisfaction with Life, Community Integration Questionnaire, or Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System 29-Item Profile Measure scores. Likewise, tracheostomy was not found to be independently associated with employment status or days to return to work.

CONCLUSIONS

This preliminary exploration suggests that physical and psychosocial recovery, as well as the ability to regain employment, are no worse in burn patients requiring tracheostomy. Future investigations of larger scale are still needed to assess center- and provider-level influences, as well as the influences of various hallmarks of injury severity. Nonetheless, this work should better inform goals of care discussions with patients and families regarding the use of tracheostomy in burn injury.

Trajectories of physical health-related quality of life among adults living with burn injuries: A burn model system national database investigation to improve early intervention and rehabilitation service delivery

INTRODUCTION

Understanding trajectories of recovery in key domains can be used to guide patients, families, and caregivers. The purpose of this study was to describe common trajectories of physical health over time and to examine predictors of these trajectories.

METHOD

Adults with burn injuries completed self-reported assessments of their health-related quality of life (HRQOL) as measured by the SF-12® Physical Component Summary (PCS) score at distinct time points (preinjury via recall, index hospital discharge, and at 6-, 12-, and 24 months after injury). Growth mixture modeling (GMM) was used to model PCS scores over time. Covariables included burn size, participant characteristics, and scores from the Community Integration Questionnaire (CIQ)/Social Integration portion, Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS), and Satisfaction With Appearance Scale (SWAP).

RESULTS

Data from 939 participants were used for complete-case analysis. Participants were 72% male, 64% non-Hispanic White, with an average age of 44 years and an average burn size of 20% of total body surface area (TBSA). The best fitting model suggested three distinct trajectories (Class 1 through 3) for HRQOL. We titled each Class according to the characteristics of their trajectory. Class 1 (recovering; n = 632), Class 2 (static; n = 77), and Class 3 (weakened; n = 205) reported near average HRQOL preinjury, then reported lower scores at discharge, with Class 1 subsequently improving to preinjury levels and Class 3 improving but not reaching their preinjury quality of life. Class 3 experienced the largest decrease in HRQOL. Class 2 reported the lowest preinjury HRQOL and remained low for the next 2 years, showing minimal change in their HRQOL.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings emphasize the importance of early universal screening and sustained intervention for those most at risk for low HRQOL following injury. For Class 2 (static), lower than average HRQOL before their injury is a warning. For Class 3 (weakened), if the scores at 6 months show a large decline, then the person is at risk for not regaining their HRQOL by 24 months and thus needs all available interventions to optimize their outcomes. Results of this study provide guidance for how to identify people with burn injury who would benefit from more intensive rehabilitation to help them achieve or regain better HRQOL. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

The Effect of Distance to Treatment Center on Long-Term Outcomes of Burn Patients

Geospatial proximity to American Burn Association (ABA)-verified burn centers or self-designated burn care facilities varies across the country. This study evaluates the effect of distance to treatment center on long-term, patient-reported outcomes. Data from the Burn Model System (BMS) National Longitudinal Database were analyzed. Demographic and clinical data were compared between three cohorts stratified by distance to BMS center (<20, 20-49.9, ≥50 miles). Distance to BMS center was calculated as driving distance between discharge and BMS center ZIP code centroids. The following patient-reported outcomes, collected at 12-months follow-up, were examined: Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey (VR-12), Satisfaction with Life (SWL) scale, employment status, and days to return to work. Mixed model regression analyses were used to examine the associations between distance to BMS center and each outcome, controlling for demographic and clinical variables. Of 726 patients included in this study, 26.3% and 28.1% were <20 and between 20 and 49.9 miles to a BMS center, respectively; 46.6% were ≥50 miles to a BMS center. Greater distance was associated with white/non-Hispanic race/ethnicity, preinjury employment, flame injury, and larger burn size (P < .001). Regression analyses did not identify significant associations between distance to BMS center and any patient-reported outcomes. This study suggests that patients treated at BMS centers have similar long-term, patient-reported outcomes of physical and psychosocial function, as well as employment, despite centralization of burn care and rehabilitation services. Given a steady decline in the incidence of burn injury, continued concentration of key resources is logical and safe.

Defining numerical cut points for mild, moderate, and severe pain in adult burn survivors: A northwest regional burn model system investigation

INTRODUCTION

Pain is a common and often debilitating sequela of burn injury. Burn pain develops following damage to peripheral sensory nerves and the release of inflammatory mediators from injury. Burn pain is complex and can include background and procedural pain that result from the injury itself, wound care, stretching, and surgery. Clinicians and researchers need valid and reliable pain measures to guide screening, treatment, and research protocols. Unlike other conditions, visual analog, or numeric pain rating scale (VAS/NRS) scores that represent mild, moderate, and severe pain among people with burn injury have not been established. The aim of this study was to identify the most suitable average pain intensity rating scores for mild, moderate, and severe pain in adult burn survivors using a PROMIS Pain Interference (PROMIS-PI) short form.

METHODS

An average pain intensity VAS/NRS score (0-10) and customized PROMIS-PI short form were administered to adults with burn injury treated at a regional burn center at hospital discharge (baseline) and at 6, 12, and 24-months after injury. To identify pain intensity scores that represent mild, moderate, and severe pain, we computed F values and Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) statistics associated with multiple ANOVA comparisons for mean pain interference scores by various pain intensity cut points. Six possible cut points (CP) were compared: CP 3,6; 3,7; 4,6; 4,7; 2,5; and 3,5. Optimal cut points were considered those with the highest ANOVA F statistics. Models with similar F statistics were also compared with BIC.

RESULTS

Data from a sample of 253 participants (83% white, 66% male, mean age 47 years) with VAS/NRS pain intensity and PROMIS-PI scores at one or more timepoints were analyzed. The optimal classification for mild, moderate, and severe pain was CP 2,5 at baseline and 12-months. Although CP 3,6 had the highest F value at 6-months, there was not strong evidence to support CP 3,6 over CP 2,5 (BIC difference: 2.9); similarly, CP 3,7 had the highest value at 24-months, but the BIC difference over CP 2,5 was only 2.2.

CONCLUSIONS

VAS/NRS scores for pain among adults with burn injury can be categorized as mild (0-2), moderate (3-5), and severe (6-10). These findings advance our understanding regarding the meaning of pain intensity ratings after burn injury, and provide an objective definition for clinical management, quality improvement, and pain research.

Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Symptom Clusters as Predictors of Pain Interference in Burn Survivors: A Burn Model System National Database Study

Individuals who experience burns are at higher risk of developing posttraumatic stress disorder and chronic pain. A synergistic relationship exists between posttraumatic stress disorder and chronic pain. We sought to evaluate the role of individual posttraumatic stress disorder symptom clusters as predictors of pain interference. We hypothesized that the hyperarousal and emotional numbing symptom clusters would be predictive of pain interference, even when accounting for the other two posttraumatic stress disorder symptom clusters, pain intensity, and other covariates. Multivariate linear regression analyses were completed using data from the Burn Model System National Database. A total of 439 adult participants had complete responses on self-report measures assessing posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms, pain intensity, and pain interference at 6-month after discharge and were included in analyses. Results indicate hyperarousal (B = .10, p = .03) and emotional numbing (B = .13, p = .01) posttraumatic stress disorder symptom clusters were each significantly associated with pain interference, even when accounting for pain intensity (B = .64, p < .001). Results highlight the importance of the emotional numbing and hyperarousal posttraumatic stress disorder symptom clusters in explaining pain interference. Findings suggest that when posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms or chronic pain are present, screening for and treating either condition may be warranted to reduce pain interference. Further, psychological interventions that target emotional numbing and hyperarousal posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms may be fruitful for promoting better coping with chronic pain and reducing pain interference.

Burn Wound Bed Management

Critical to the success of modern burn care is the management of the burn wound. Timely and complete removal of nonviable tissue is complicated by the irreplaceable nature of the tissue lost either through the burn injury or as "collateral damage" as part of the treatment. Challenges in distinguishing between viable and nonviable tissue and "replacing the irreplaceable" are discussed alongside potential disruptive technologies which could fundamentally change how burn care is delivered. Advances in burn wound bed management forms the foundation on which the goal of zero preventable death and disability after burn injury can be achieved.

Developing a National Trauma Research Action Plan: Results from the long-term outcomes research gap Delphi survey

BACKGROUND

In the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine 2016 report on trauma care, the establishment of a National Trauma Research Action Plan to strengthen and guide future trauma research was recommended. To address this recommendation, the Department of Defense funded the Coalition for National Trauma Research to generate a comprehensive research agenda spanning the continuum of trauma and burn care. We describe the gap analysis and high-priority research questions generated from the National Trauma Research Action Plan panel on long-term outcomes.

METHODS

Experts in long-term outcomes were recruited to identify current gaps in long-term trauma outcomes research, generate research questions, and establish the priority for these questions using a consensus-driven, Delphi survey approach from February 2021 to August 2021. Panelists were identified using established Delphi recruitment guidelines to ensure heterogeneity and generalizability including both military and civilian representation. Panelists were encouraged to use a PICO format to generate research questions: Patient/Population, Intervention, Compare/Control, and Outcome model. On subsequent surveys, panelists were asked to prioritize each research question on a 9-point Likert scale, categorized to represent low-, medium-, and high-priority items. Consensus was defined as ≥60% of panelists agreeing on the priority category.

RESULTS

Thirty-two subject matter experts generated 482 questions in 17 long-term outcome topic areas. By Round 3 of the Delphi, 359 questions (75%) reached consensus, of which 107 (30%) were determined to be high priority, 252 (70%) medium priority, and 0 (0%) low priority. Substance abuse and pain was the topic area with the highest number of questions. Health services (not including mental health or rehabilitation) (64%), mental health (46%), and geriatric population (43%) were the topic areas with the highest proportion of high-priority questions.

CONCLUSION

This Delphi gap analysis of long-term trauma outcomes research identified 107 high-priority research questions that will help guide investigators in future long-term outcomes research.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic Tests or Criteria; Level IV.

122 PTSD Symptom Clusters as Predictors of Pain Interference in Burn Survivors

Introduction

Individuals who experience burns are at higher risk of developing post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and chronic pain. There exists a synergistic relationship between PTSD and chronic pain in burn survivors. Theories exist about how aspects of each condition may perpetuate one another, or share underlying mechanisms. Both of these conditions are of relevance to pain-related disability. We sought to examine the role of individual PTSD symptom clusters as predictors of pain interference. We hypothesized that the hyperarousal and emotional numbing symptom clusters would be predictive of pain interference, even when accounting for the other two PTSD symptom clusters, pain intensity, and other covariates (burn size, hospital length of stay, age and gender).

Methods

Data were analyzed from the Burn Model System National Database. Inclusion criteria required participants to have a moderate to severe burn injury that required surgery for wound closure. Patient-reported outcome data: PTSD Checklist - Civilian, PROMIS-Pain Interference Short Form 4a, and a 0-10 average Pain Intensity item were analyzed at 6-months after injury. Hierarchical linear regression models were fit to examine the impact of PTSD symptom clusters on pain interference over and above that of pain intensity, and standardized betas were calculated (B).

Results

A total of 439 adult participants had complete responses on the measures of interest (e.g. PTSD symptoms, PROMIS-Pain Interference, and Pain Intensity) and were included in the analysis. Mean age, percent total body surface area burned, and hospital length of stay were 47 years, 18%, and 27 days, respectively. 69% were male and 82% were Caucasian. Results of a linear regression found that hyperarousal (B = .10, p = .03) and emotional numbing (B = .13, p = .01) PTSD symptom clusters were each significant predictors of pain-related disability, even when accounting for pain intensity (B = .64, p < .001). The covariates age, gender, days until discharge, and TBSA were all nonsignificant. The model accounted for 61% of the variance associated with pain-related disability.

Conclusions

Results highlight the importance of the emotional numbing and hyperarousal PTSD symptom clusters in explaining pain interference. Future evaluations parsing out the longitudinal relationships (i.e., beyond 6-months postburn) between PTSD symptom clusters, pain intensity, and pain interference, as well as evaluating other underlying mechanisms, are warranted.

73 Associations Between Pre-burn Occupation Type and Employment Outcomes at One Year

Introduction

Reintegration into the workforce after burn injury is an important issue for survivors. In a 2012 systematic review, 28% of burn survivors never returned to any form of employment. Although pre-burn employment status is strongly associated with post-burn employment, there are little data on the role of pre-injury occupation type on workplace reintegration. The aim of this project was to assess the impact of occupation type on employment outcomes after burn injury.

Methods

Data from the National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research Burn Model System National Longitudinal Database from 2015 to 2021 were used to investigate the association between occupation type and employment outcomes. Occupation type was classified into two groups, Labor and Non-labor, using the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics Standard Occupational Classification System. Demographic and clinical data were compared between groups. Mixed regression analyses examined associations between pre-burn occupation type and post-burn employment outcomes (employment at 1 year, days to return to work), controlling for age, gender, race, ethnicity, pre-injury employment, and burn size.

Results

Of the 600 patients who were employed pre-injury, 247 (41%) identified with a non-labor occupation and 353 (59%) with labor occupations. The Labor group was more male (82% vs. 61%) and Hispanic (23% vs. 6%), younger (mean age 42.1 vs. 48.3 years), less educated (high school or less, 25% vs. 11%) and more likely to have been injured at work (28% vs. 14%) compared to the Non-labor group (p< 0.001 for all comparisons). Changes in occupation were seen from pre-injury to post-injury; 16% of working survivors changed from Non-labor to Labor and 13% from Labor to Non-labor occupation types. For those who did return to work after injury, the average time to return to work was greater for Labor compared to the Non-labor group (150 vs 100 days; p=0.003). Additionally, those in the pre-injury Labor group were less likely to be employed at 12 months compared to the Non-labor group (odds ratio = 0.41; p=0.009).

Conclusions

Pre-injury occupation type is associated with employment outcomes after injury. Therefore, occupation type can be used to inform vocational reintegration resources, such as vocational rehabilitation programs, to optimize survivor outcomes.

10 The Impact of Insurance Disparities on Long-term Burn Outcomes: A Burn Model System Investigation

Introduction

Access to healthcare and insurance coverage are associated with quality of life, morbidity, and mortality outcomes. However, most studies have only focused on same-admission and short-term outcomes due to the lack of national longitudinal data and there is limited data on this topic in the burn literature. Our aim was to determine the effect of insurance status on long-term outcomes in a national sample of burn patients.

Methods

This is a retrospective study using the longitudinal Burn Model System National Database from January 2015 to April 2021. The inclusion criteria were all adult patients admitted for burn injury from participating sites. Main outcomes were the physical (PCS) and mental (MCS) health component summary scores of the Veterans RAND 12 (VR-12) score at 6, 12, and 24 months after injury. Multivariable regression was used to examine the association between insurance status and the outcomes, adjusting for demographics (i.e., age, gender, race/ethnicity) and burn injury severity.

Results

A total of 3,698 burn patients were included. Mean age was 43.39 (SD 15.84) years, 72% were male and 76% were white. Most patients had private/commercial insurance (56.37%), followed by Medicare (14.42%) and Medicaid (13.18%). The remaining 16% were uninsured patients (self-pay or philanthropy). Mean PCS scores were 43.64 (SD 10.87), 45.31 (SD 11.04) and 46.45 (SD 10.65) and Mean MCS scores were 47.80 (SD 12.35), 48.18 (SD 12.30) and 48.44 (SD 12.18) at 6, 12 and 24 months, respectively. In adjusted analyses, Medicaid insurance was associated with worse MCS at 6 months (Coefficient -3.90, p=0.001), and worse PCS at 12 and 24 months (Coefficient -3.09, p=0.004 and Coefficient -4.18, p< 0.001, respectively), compared to uninsured status. Medicare insurance was associated with worse PCS scores at 24 months (Coefficient -3.07, p=0.013).

Conclusions

Having Medicaid and Medicare insurance was significantly associated with a lower health-related quality of life at long-term follow up, even after adjusting for demographics and burn injury severity. Further studies need to focus on analyzing the reasons for these disparities and developing strategies to improve the quality of life of this subpopulation.

109 The Impact of Distance to Treatment Center on Long-term Outcomes of Burn Patients

Introduction

Geospatial access to American Burn Association (ABA)-verified burn centers or self-designated burn care facilities varies across the country. It is often necessary to transport patients hundreds of miles to provide definitive burn care and rehabilitation services. This study evaluates the impact of distance to treatment center on long-term outcomes of burn patients.

Methods

Data from the National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research Burn Model System (BMS) National Database, collected from 2015 to 2019, were analyzed to investigate the impact of distance to BMS center on long-term, patient-reported outcomes. Distance was calculated as driving distance between home zip code centroid and BMS center. Demographic and clinical data were compared between groups by distance from BMS center (< 20, 20-49.9, >50 miles). The following patient-reported outcome measures, collected 12 months after injury, were examined: Veterans Rand 12 Physical Component Summary Score (VR-12 PCS), Veterans Rand 12 Mental Component Summary Score (VR-12 MCS), Satisfaction with Life (SWL), employment status, and days to return to work. Mixed regression model analyses were used to examine the associations between distance to BMS center and each outcome measure, controlling for demographic and clinical variables.

Results

Of the 726 participants included in this study, 191 (26.3%) and 204 (28.1%) were < 20 and between 20-49.9 miles from a BMS center, respectively; 331 (46.6%) were >50 miles from a BMS center. Greater distance to BMS center was associated with white race/ethnicity (p< 0.001) and employment at time of injury (p=0.001). Greater distance to BMS center was also associated with flame injury (p< 0.001) and larger burn size (p< 0.001). There were no significant differences in length of stay or number of operations between groups. Regression analyses did not identify significant associations between distance to BMS center and VR-12 PCS, VR-12 MCS, SWL, employment at 12 months, or days to return to work.

Conclusions

After burn injury, patient-reported outcome measures of physical and psychosocial function, as well as employment, do not differ based on distance to BMS center.

114 Long Term Impact of Hospital Acquired Multi-drug Resistant Organisms on Health-related Quality of Life

Introduction

MDROs colonize wounds and cause infections for hospitalized burn patients, which may lead to increased infection risk, wound complications, longer (LOS) and more cost. Little is known about the long-term impacts of MDRO colonization and infection on burn survivors. We aimed to describe the impacts of colonization on long-term health-related quality of life (HRQoL), itch, and pain.

Methods

Data from adult participants in a multicenter longitudinal outcome study were used. Data was described and χ ² and Kruskal-Wallis testing was applied to determine differences between the two groups. Outcomes included Veterans RAND 12 (VR-12) physical component summary score (PCS), and PROMIS 29 domains for pain intensity, fatigue, pain interference, physical function, and sleep disturbance. Pruritus was assessed using the 4-D Itch scale for total itch. Multilevel, multiple linear regressions were used for outcome measures at 6 m post-injury. Random effects regression with robust standard errors (SE) were used to evaluate the impacts over time.

Results

The study included 704 individuals and 92 were MDRO colonized (13%). Colonized patients had larger burns (25% TBSA, IQR 9-45 vs. 8% TBSA, IQR 3–20; p < .001), more operations (4, IQR 2-7 vs. 1, IQR 1-3; p < .001), more grafting (17% TBSA, IQR 3-46 vs. 3% TBSA, IQR 1- 9; p < .001), more ventilator days (2, IQR 0–8 vs. 0 IQR 0-0; p < .001), and longer LOS (34 days, IQR 17 – 64 vs. 16, IQR 9 - 27; p < .001). Adjusting for confounding covariables, such as demographics, colonization was associated with a lower PCS score (OR -0.33, 95% CI -0.68, -0.06; p=.018); a higher fatigue score (OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.13, 0.79; p = .007) and worse itch (OR 0.4, 95% CI -0.01, 0.75; p = .036). There was no association with pain intensity, pain interference, or sleep disturbance. Random effects regression indicated that colonization was associated with lower PCS (OR -5.0, 95% CI -8.60, -1.39; p = .007).

Conclusions

Impact of colonization extends beyond the immediate hospitalization and likely has long-term effects on HRQoL. Given our observation of lower physical function after MDRO, more granular research on taxa-specific effects, timing of colonization, and interventions are indicated to elucidate the impact on HRQoL.

68 The Association Between Body Mass Index and Physical Function in Adult Burn Survivors

Introduction

An area of rehabilitation research in burns is the impact of co-morbidities. Obesity is one of these, is an increasing public health concern, and its role remains controversial regarding burn injury and physical recovery. Our aim was to evaluate associations between body mass index (BMI) as a measure of obesity, at discharge and self-reported physical function (PF) during recovery of adult burn survivors.

Methods

This study included data that was collected by four American Burn Association-verified burn centers, which contribute to the Burn Model System National Database project. The data included BMI obtained at hospital discharge and self-reported Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-29 PF-mobility and upper extremity scores assessed at 6-, 12-, and 24-months after burn. Mixed linear models for repeated measures and regression models were used to assess associations between BMI and PROMIS-29 PF scores over time. Values are expressed as means ± SD. Significance was set at p&lt; 0.05.

Results

A total of 502 adult patients aged 47 ± 16 years were included, with mean total body surface area burned (TBSA) of 17 ± 18 % (range; 1.0-88%) and mean BMI of 23.1 ± 5.4 kg*m-2 (range; 14.0-64.7 kg*m-2). We found no significant effect at 6 months (beta=-0.045, p= 0.54) nor at 12 months after injury (beta=-0.063, p= 0.44) when adjusted for age, burn size, and sex, however, BMI at discharge had a significant negative effect on self-reported mobility scores 24 months after injury (beta=0.218, p=&lt; 0.05).

Conclusions

Increased weight (i.e. BMI) at discharge was negatively associated with PF during recovery. Benefiting from a large sample size, our analysis suggests that long term recovery and restoration of PF in adult burn survivors is compromized by excess body weight.

78 Classification and Regression Tree Model for Predicting Satisfaction with Life Scale Scores After Burn Injury

Introduction

Current early burn care prognostication models predict in-hospital mortality (e.g., revised Baux Score). However, patients, families and clinicians need more holistic tools in the hours and days after injury to identify specific factors that might affect their quality of life and indicate a need for more intensive services. This project aims to predict Satisfaction with Life (SWL) in survivors of burn injury using patient, injury, and care factors available within 24 hours of admission.

Methods

Two hundred and fourteen participants were identified from a multicenter national longitudinal database and merged with clinical data from a single institution's trauma registry. Patients were randomized into a training dataset (80%) and a testing dataset (20%). A CART algorithm was used to examine the relative contributions of individual predictor variables in classifying low SWL at six-month follow up (SWL ≤ 20). Seventeen covariables obtained within 24 hours of index hospital admission were analyzed from five domains: demographics, comorbidities, injury, care, and host response to injury. Lab values were those closest to but not greater than 24 hours after index hospital admission.

Results

Multiple covariables contributed to the SWL score. CART analysis selected a pre-injury SWL score < 31 as the first node and strongest indicator of low SWL. CART then selected the following subgroups at risk for SWL ≤ 20 at 6 months: (1) hematocrit >55%; (2) lactate >4 mmol/L, age > 59; (3) total body surface area (TBSA) burned >30%, presence of a hand, neck, and/or face burn. The cross-validated predictive accuracy of the CART model was 69.4% with a cross-validated relative error of 0.379. In the validation data set, sensitivity and specificity were 62.5% and 72.0%, respectively.

Conclusions

The findings demonstrate the potential feasibility of creating a model that can predict a clinically meaningful quality of life outcome using covariables gathered within hours of hospital admission after burn injury. Predictive measures suggest that while some of the included covariables may be associated with SWL, they are not consistently and reliably predictive of low SWL alone. With more data and additional refined inputs, a similar model could be used to identify those in need of more intensive services earlier on in the hospitalization.

83 The Impact of Tracheostomy on Long-term Patient Outcomes: A Burn Model System National Database Study

Introduction

Management of the upper airway is crucial to burn care, especially in the setting of inhalation injury or burns to the face or neck. Endotracheal intubation is often performed to secure the airway; however, tracheostomy may be necessary in patients requiring prolonged ventilatory support. This study compares long-term outcomes of burn patients with and without tracheostomy.

Methods

Data from the Burn Model System National Database, collected from 2013 to 2020, were analyzed. Demographic and clinical data were compared between those with and without tracheostomy. The following patient-reported outcome measures, collected at 6-, 12-, and 24-months, were analyzed: Veterans Rand 12 Physical Component Summary Score (VR-12 PCS), Veterans Rand 12 Mental Component Summary Score (VR-12 MCS), Satisfaction with Life (SWL), Community Integration Questionnaire (CIQ), Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29), employment status, and number of days to return to work. Regression models were used to assess the impact of tracheostomy status on long-term outcome measures, controlling for demographic and clinical variables.

Results

Of the 714 patients included in this study, 39 (5.46%) received a tracheostomy and 675 (94.54%) did not. The two groups were similar across all demographic data collected. Tracheostomy patients were more likely to have flame injury, inhalation injury, larger burn size, more trips to the operating room, longer hospital stay, and greater number of days on a ventilator (p< 0.001). Regression model analyses demonstrated that tracheostomy was associated with worse VR-12 PCS scores at 6-, 12-, and 24-months (6.6 [95% CI 1.5, 11.8], p=0.012; 11.5 [6.2, 16.8], p< 0.001; 10.8 [4.2, 17.5], p=0.001). Tracheostomy was also associated with worse scores in two PROMIS-29 domains, physical function and pain interference. For physical function, the association was seen at 6-, 12-, and 24-months (7.4 [3.0, 11.8], p=0.001; 9.6 [5.2, 14.0], p< 0.001; 11.3 [5.8, 16.9], p< 0.001). For pain interference, the association was only seen at 12-months (-5.3 [-10.0, -0.55], p=0.029).

Conclusions

After burn injury, patient-reported outcome measures of physical function and pain interference were significantly worse with tracheostomy.

The relation between satisfaction with appearance and race and ethnicity: A National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research burn model system study

Research supports that people of color in the U.S. have poorer outcomes after burn injury compared to White individuals. The current study sought to explore burn health disparities by testing the relationship between racial and ethnic minority status, a proxy for systemic discrimination due to race and ethnicity, with two key constructs linked to functional outcomes, satisfaction with appearance and social community integration. Participants included 1318 burn survivors from the Burn Model System National Database (mean age = 40.2, SD = 12.7). Participants completed measures of satisfaction with appearance and social community integration at baseline, 6-, 12-, and 24-months after burn injury. Linear regressions revealed that racial and ethnic minority status significantly related to lower satisfaction with appearance and social community integration compared to White individuals at all time points. In addition, satisfaction with appearance continued to significantly relate to greater social community integration even while accounting for race and ethnicity, age, sex, burn size, and physical disability at 6-, 12-, and 24-month time points. Overall, the study supports that racial and ethnic minority burn survivors report greater dissatisfaction with their appearance and lower social community reintegration after burn injury.

Adolescents with and without head and neck burns: comparison of long-term outcomes in the burn model system national database

INTRODUCTION

Facial burns account for persistent differences in psychosocial functioning in adult burn survivors. Although adolescent burn survivors experience myriad chronic sequelae, little is known about the effect of facial injuries. This study examines differences in long-term outcomes with and without head and neck involvement.

METHODS

Data collected for 392 burn survivors between 14-17.9 years of age from the Burn Model System National Database (2006-2015) were analyzed. Comparisons were made between two groups based on presence of a head and neck burn (H&N) using the following patient reported outcome measures: Satisfaction with Appearance Scale, Satisfaction with Life Scale, Community Integration Questionnaire, and Short Form-12 Health Survey at 6, 12, and 24 months after injury. Regression analyses were used to assess association between outcome measures and H&N group at 12-months.

RESULTS

The H&N group had more extensive burns, had longer hospital stays, were more likely to be burned by fire/flame and were more likely to be Hispanic compared to the non-H&N group. Regression analysis found that H&N burn status was associated with worse SWAP scores. No significant associations were found between H&N burn status and other outcome measures.

CONCLUSIONS

Adolescents with H&N burn status showed significantly worse satisfaction with appearance at 12-months after injury. Future research should examine interventions to help improve body image and coping for adolescent burn survivors with head and neck burns.

Developing a national trauma research action plan: Results from the Burn Research Gap Delphi Survey

BACKGROUND

The 2016 National Academies of Science, Engineering and Medicine call for a national integrated, military-civilian trauma action plan to achieve zero preventable deaths and disability after injury included a proposal to establish a National Trauma Research Action Plan to "strengthen trauma research and ensure that the resources available for this research are commensurate with the importance of injury and the potential for improvement in patient outcomes." The Department of Defense funded the Coalition for National Trauma Research to generate a comprehensive research agenda spanning the continuum of trauma/burn care from prehospital to rehabilitation. The Burn/Reconstructive Surgery group represents one focus area for this research agenda development.

METHODS

Experts in burn and reconstructive surgery research identified gaps in knowledge, generated research questions and prioritized questions using a consensus driven Delphi survey approach. Participants were identified using established Delphi recruitment guidelines to ensure heterogeneity and generalizability with military and civilian representatives. Literature reviews informed the panel. Panelists were encouraged to use a PICO format to generate research questions: Patient/Population; Intervention; Compare/Control; Outcome. Participants ranked the priority of each question on a nine-point Likert scale, which was categorized to represent low, medium, and high priority items. Consensus was defined based on ≥60% panelist agreement.

RESULTS

Subject matter experts generated 949 research questions in 29 Burn & 26 Reconstruction topics. Five hundred ninety-seven questions reached consensus. Of these, 338 (57%) were high-priority, 180 (30%), medium-priority, and 78 (13%) low-priority questions.

CONCLUSION

Many high-priority questions translate to complex wound management and outcomes. Panel recognition that significant gaps in knowledge exist in understanding functional outcomes after injury underscores the importance of long-term recovery metrics even when studying acute injury or interventions such as resuscitation or inhalation injury. Funding agencies and burn/reconstructive surgery researchers should consider these gaps when they prioritize future research.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Expert consensus, Level IV.

Temperature sensitivity after burn injury: A Burn Model System National Database Hot Topic

BACKGROUND

People living with burn injury often report temperature sensitivity. However, its epidemiology and associations with health-related quality of life (HRQOL) are unknown. We aimed to characterize temperature sensitivity and determine its impact on HRQOL to inform patient education after recovery from burn injury.

METHODS

We used the multicenter, longitudinal Burn Model System National Database to assess temperature sensitivity at 6, 12 and 24 months after burn injury. Chi-square and Kruskal-Wallis tests determined differences in patient and injury characteristics. Multivariable, multi-level generalized linear regression models determined the association of temperature sensitivity with Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWL) scores and Veterans RAND 12 (VR-12) physical (PCS) and mental health summary (MCS) component scores.

RESULTS

The cohort comprised 637 participants. Two thirds (66%) experienced temperature sensitivity. They had larger burns (12% TBSA, IQR 4-30 vs 5% TBSA, IQR 2-15; p<0.0001), required more grafting (5% TBSA, IQR 1-19 vs 2% TBSA, IQR 0-6; p<0.0001), and had higher intensity of pruritus at discharge (11% severe vs 5% severe; p=0.002). After adjusting for confounding variables, temperature sensitivity was strongly associated with lower SWL (OR -3.2, 95% CI -5.2, -1.1) and MCS (OR -4.0, 95% CI -6.9, -1.2) at 6-months. Temperature sensitivity decreased over time (43% at discharge, 4% at 24-months) and was not associated with poorer HRQOL at 12 and 24 months.

CONCLUSION

Temperature sensitivity is common after burn injury and associated with worse SWL and MCS during the first year after injury. However, temperature sensitivity seems to improve and be less intrusive over time.

Physical and Psychological Recovery Following Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis: A Patient Survey

Stevens Johnson Syndrome (SJS) and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis (TEN) are acute, life-threatening diseases that cause sloughing of the skin and mucous membranes. Despite improved survival rates, few studies focus on long-term outcomes. We conducted a single-center review of all patients with SJS/TEN admitted from January 2008-2014. SJS/TEN survivors were invited to participate in the validated Veterans RAND 12 Item Health Survey (VR-12) to assess health related quality of life using a mental health composite score (MCS) and physical health component score (PCS). The sample was compared to US norms using one sample two tailed t-tests. A second questionnaire addressed potential long-term medical complications related to SJS/TEN. Of 81 treated subjects, 24 (30%) long-term survivors responded. Participants identified cutaneous sequelae most frequently (79%), followed by nail problems (70%), oral (62%) and ocular (58%) sequalae. Thirty-eight percent rated their quality of life to be "unchanged" to "much better" since their episode of SJS/TEN. The average PCS score was lower than US population norms (mean: 36 vs. 50, p=0.006), indicating persistent physical sequelae from SJS/TEN. These results suggest that SJS/TEN survivors continue to suffer from long-term complications that impair their quality of life and warrant ongoing follow-up by a multidisciplinary care team.