Preliminary estimate for the second-trimester maternal serum screening detection rate of the 45,X karyotype using α-fetoprotein, unconjugated estriol and human chorionic gonadotropin

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the detection rate for 45,X pregnancies through second-trimester screening using maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein, human chorionic gonadotropin and unconjugated estriol.

METHODS

Twenty-two cases of 45,X were ascertained through a cytogenetics database and an additional 51 cases were identified through publications. Serum analyte concentrations were reviewed for cases with fetal hydrops, cystic hygroma alone, and no evidence of edema. Using the statistical characteristics of this sample of affected pregnancies, computer simulations were carried out to determine the proportion of 45,X pregnancies that should be screen-positive for Down syndrome and trisomy 18. The extent to which additional cases of 45,X might be identified using a protocol specifically designed to detect 45,X pregnancies was also estimated.

RESULTS

Approximately 54% of all 45,X pregnancies should be identifiable through screening for Down syndrome and trisomy 18. The detection rate for cases with hydrops and/or cystic hygroma was 60%, and without edema 33%. If offered with screening for Down syndrome and trisomy 18, 45,X screening could identify approximately 7% more of the affected pregnancies with an incremental rise of 0.2% in the false-positive rate.

CONCLUSIONS

A screening algorithm for 45,X could be developed. However, the number of additional affected pregnancies identified would appear to be too small to justify this screening.

Cost analysis of Down syndrome screening in advanced maternal age

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the potential cost and efficacy of Down syndrome screening in the population with advanced maternal age.

METHODS

Three screening methods defining Down syndrome risk for women with advanced maternal age were analyzed: advanced maternal age; advanced maternal age and maternal serum triple screen; and advanced maternal age, maternal serum triple screen and genetic sonogram. Costs for all tests and procedures were estimated. Procedure-related loss for amniocentesis was assumed to be 1:200. Efficacy was defined as: number of amniocenteses performed, number of Down syndrome cases detected, procedure-related losses, Down syndrome cases detected per fetal loss, cost per Down syndrome case detected and total cost of screening.

RESULTS

In 1999 in the USA, there were 530,610 women with advanced maternal age at 16 weeks' gestation carrying an estimated 4,043 fetuses with Down syndrome. Screening by maternal age alone would result in the 100% detection of Down syndrome cases, but would require over 530,000 amniocenteses and result in 2,653 procedure-related losses. Combining age with serum screen and genetic sonogram would detect 97.6% of Down syndrome cases, but would require only 119,791 amniocenteses and result in 599 procedure-related losses. The projected cost per Down syndrome case detected using age screening is 219,109 dollars versus 155,992 dollars using serum screen and genetic sonogram.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of advanced maternal age, maternal serum screen and genetic sonogram would result in the fewest procedure-related losses and lowest cost per Down syndrome case detected.

Extreme second-trimester serum analyte values in down syndrome pregnancies with hydrops fetalis

OBJECTIVE

To compare second-trimester maternal serum analyte values in Down syndrome pregnancies with, and without, hydrops fetalis.

METHODS

Seven hydropic and 85 non-hydropic Down syndrome pregnancies were identified among women with positive second-trimester maternal serum screening results. Values for maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein (MSAFP), human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), unconjugated estriol and inhibin-A, and risks for Down syndrome were compared using the non-parametric Mann-Whitney statistical test.

RESULTS

Hydropic Down syndrome pregnancies had significantly lower MSAFP and estriol concentrations, while hCG levels were higher. For subgroups of five hydropic and 42 non-hydropic cases, no statistically significant difference in the inhibin-A levels could be demonstrated.

CONCLUSION

Second-trimester Down syndrome screening risks are significantly higher in affected pregnancies that are complicated by fetal hydrops.

Role of ultrasound for Down syndrome screening in advanced maternal age

OBJECTIVE

To determine the sensitivity and false-positive rate of Down syndrome screening by use of maternal serum screen and the genetic sonogram in women > or =35 years of age.

STUDY DESIGN

We searched our perinatal databases retrospectively from January 1992 to January 2000 for the following criteria: known Down syndrome fetus or newborn, advanced maternal age, and genetic sonogram from 14-24 weeks' gestation. The a priori maternal age or maternal serum screen risk was modified by likelihood ratios for ultrasound markers. Without markers the risk was reduced by 50%. The cut-off was 1:270.

RESULTS

Age and maternal serum screen had a sensitivity of 90.5% and a false-positive rate of 27.1%. Age and ultrasound had a 95.2% sensitivity and 43.5% false-positive rate, whereas the combination of age, maternal serum screen, and ultrasound had a 97.6% sensitivity and a 22.0% false-positive rate.

CONCLUSION

The combination of age, maternal serum screen, and ultrasound improves the sensitivity for Down syndrome detection in the advanced maternal age population.

Second trimester maternal serum analytes in triploid pregnancies: correlation with phenotype and sex chromosome complement

Second trimester maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein (MS-AFP), human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG), unconjugated estiol (uE3), and inhibin-A (INH-A) levels were evaluated in pregnancies complicated by triploidy. In addition to seven new triploid pregnancies, the results for 67 published cases were reviewed. All cases appear to fall into two major groups. First, those identifiable as screen-positive for both Down syndrome and an open neural tube defect (ONTD) with elevated MS-AFP, grossly elevated hCG, low/normal uE3, and probably elevated INH-A. Pregnancies in the second group are identifiable as screen-positive for trisomy 18 with low/normal MS-AFP, and very low hCG, uE3 and INH-A. Triploid pregnancies with high maternal serum hCG nearly always show a placenta with partial mole (25/27 or 93%), a high frequency of ONTDs or ventral wall defects (VWDs) (8/28 or 29%) and have either an XXX or XXY karyotype (observed ratio 6:10, respectively). Low hCG is infrequently associated with a molar placenta (1/11 or 9%), does not appear to be associated with ONTDs or VWDs (0/29 or 0%), and shows an excess of XXX over XXY karyotypes (observed ratio 17:2). There were 16 cases with either a molar placenta, an ONTD or a VWD that received the MS-AFP and hCG tests. All 16 were screen-positive for an ONTD (MS-AFP> or =2 multiples of the median). In addition, all 31 cases that received MS-AFP, hCG, uE3 (and where available INH-A) were screen-positive for either Down syndrome or trisomy 18. The findings are discussed in the context of expected differences between digynic and diandric triploidy. It is suggested that the sex chromosome complement in triploidy is an important factor in determining risk for partial mole development and in utero survival.

Estimates for the sensitivity and false-positive rates for second trimester serum screening for Down syndrome and trisomy 18 with adjustment for cross-identification and double-positive results

Second trimester screening for fetal Down syndrome and trisomy 18 is available through separate protocols that combine the maternal age-specific risk and the analysis of maternal serum markers. We have determined the extent to which additional Down syndrome affected pregnancies may be identified through trisomy 18 screening, and the extent to which additional cases of trisomy 18 may be screen-positive for Down syndrome. The combined false-positive rate, taking into consideration those pregnancies that are screen-positive by both protocols, has also been determined. Sensitivity and false-positive rates were determined by computer simulation of results that incorporated previously published statistical variables into the model. Using second trimester risk cut-offs of 1:270 for Down syndrome and 1:100 for trisomy 18, it was found that few additional cases of Down syndrome are identified through trisomy 18 screening. However, approximately 6-10% of trisomy 18 affected pregnancies will be screen-positive for Down syndrome but screen-negative for trisomy 18. For women aged 40 or more, the false-positive rate for trisomy 18 exceeds 1% and approximately half of these cases will also be screen-positive for Down syndrome. For a population with maternal ages equivalent to that in the United States in 1998, after adjusting for the cross-identification, the sensitivity for three-analyte trisomy 18 screening is 78%. If this testing is performed in conjunction with Down syndrome "triple" screening, the Down syndrome sensitivity is 75% and the combined false-positive rate is 8.5%. If the three-analyte trisomy 18 screening is performed with the Down syndrome "quad" screen, the trisomy 18 sensitivity remains at 78%, the Down syndrome sensitivity is 79%, and combined false-positive rate is 7.5%. Sensitivity and false-positive rates are also provided for other widely used Down syndrome and trisomy 18 risk cut-offs. Sensitivity and false-positive rates that take into consideration cross-identification and double-positives should be helpful for pre-test counseling and the evaluation of serum screening programs.

Evaluation of effect of analytical imprecision in maternal serum screening for Down's syndrome

Formulae to evaluate the effect of inter-assay analytical imprecision (expressed as the coefficient of variation) in maternal serum screening for Down's syndrome have been developed. Experimentally determined imprecision in Down's syndrome risk (based on maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein, unconjugated oestriol and human chorionic gonadotrophin) was found to be consistent with predicted values. Imprecision in the measurement of analytes becomes amplified when risk is calculated using the values of these analytes. A large separation between the means and small standard deviations for normal and affected pregnancies are the characteristics of the tests most useful in screening, but these attributes also result in the most imprecision in risk. In addition, the relative imprecision associated with Down's syndrome risk is not the same for all women screened. Combining tests for multivariate analyses results in a complex compounding of the errors. The need for strict quality control and test reproducibility is emphasized. The effect of analytical imprecision should be of particular concern to laboratories that provide screening for women of advanced maternal age.

Elevated maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein with low unconjugated estriol and the risk for lethal perinatal outcome

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether a combination of elevated maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein (MSAFP) and low unconjugated estriol (E3) concentration identifies pregnancies at particularly high risk for fetal abnormality or poor outcome.

METHODS

Pregnancy outcomes were reviewed for women with elevated MSAFP (> or =2.0 MoM) from our database of 50,315 women who had received triple marker testing from 1993-1998. Outcomes for those with low E3 (< or =0.7 MoM) were compared with those with normal E3 (>0.7 MoM). The incidences of fetal death, neural tube defects, chromosome abnormalities, congenital abnormalities, preterm birth, small-for-gestational age (SGA), twins, and inaccurate dates were compared in the two groups using Fisher's exact test with P < 0.05 considered significant.

RESULTS

Of the 50,315 women screened, 1,435 (2.85%) had an elevated MSAFP. Pregnancy outcomes were obtained in 94% of those with elevated MSAFP and 70% of all patients screened. Neural tube defects were present in 57 fetuses/infants (21 anencephalic, 29 spina bifida, 7 encephalocele) of which 46 (81%) had an elevated MSAFP. Of the 1,435 women with an elevated MSAFP, 199 (14%) had a low E3. Compared to those women with elevated MSAFP but normal E3, women with elevated MSAFP and low E3 were at significantly increased risk for fetal death (20.6% vs. 2.8%, relative risk (RR) 8.9), anencephaly (9.0% vs. 0.1%, RR 122.8) and chromosome abnormality (2.5% vs. 0.6%, RR 4.0).

CONCLUSIONS

Pregnancies complicated by elevated second trimester MSAFP and low E3 are at a particularly high risk (32%) for lethal perinatal outcomes. Twins, while a common cause of elevated MSAFP, are rarely found when an elevated MSAFP is associated with low E3.

Unexplained elevated midtrimester maternal serum levels of alpha fetoprotein, human chorionic gonadotropin, or low unconjugated estriol: recurrence risk and association with adverse perinatal outcome

OBJECTIVE

To determine if women experiencing an unexplained elevated maternal serum alpha fetoprotein (MSAFP; > or =2.0 MoM) or human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG; > or =2.0 MoM), or low unconjugated estriol (E3; < or =0.5 MoM) in one pregnancy are at increased risk for similar results in a subsequent pregnancy, and to determine if recurrence of these analyte extremes is associated with adverse perinatal outcome.

METHODS

We identified all women delivering two consecutive singleton pregnancies at one hospital between 1992-1997 for whom second trimester trisomy 21 serum screen was performed in each pregnancy. All screens were performed in a single laboratory. Each pregnancy delivered after 20 weeks and had gestational age confirmed by ultrasound prior to 24 weeks. Subjects were excluded if a fetal anomaly or aneuploidy was present. Adverse outcomes included abruption, oligohydramnios, preeclampsia, preterm membrane rupture, preterm delivery, stillbirth, birthweight <10th centile, and admission to neonatal intensive care unit (NICU).

RESULTS

A total of 538 women had 1,076 pregnancies meeting inclusion criteria; 12/515 (2.3%) of women with a normal MSAFP, 28/470 (6.0%) with a normal hCG, and 11/504 (2.2%) with a normal E3 in the first pregnancy had an anomalous result for the respective analyte in the second pregnancy. In contrast, only 4/23 (17.4%) patients with an elevated MSAFP (P = 0.003), 14/44 (31.8%) with an elevated hCG (P < 0.001), and 2/10 (20.0%) with a low E3 (P < 0.025) in the first pregnancy had the same analyte anomaly recur in the second pregnancy. The odds ratios for recurrent elevated MSAFP, hCG, and low E3 were 7.5, 5.3, and 9.2, respectively. Adverse perinatal outcomes occurred with similar frequency, regardless of MSAFP, hCG, or E3 results in consecutive pregnancies, using women with normal MSAFP, hCG, and E3 results in one or both pregnancies as controls.

CONCLUSIONS

Women experiencing an anomalous serum analyte in one pregnancy are at significant risk to experience the same analyte result in a subsequent pregnancy.

Predictive value of the triple screening test for the phenotype of Down syndrome

Maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein (MSAFP), human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), and unconjugated estriol (uE3) are routinely measured in the second trimester ("triple" test) and combined with maternal age to evaluate risk for fetal Down syndrome. Triple test results and clinical findings were retrospectively reviewed for 30 newborns with Down syndrome to determine whether analyte values or second trimester risks for Down syndrome were more extreme in affected pregnancies where cardiac or other severe congenital malformations were present compared to those cases where major anatomical abnormalities were absent. Mean MS-AFP, uE3, maternal age, and second trimester Down syndrome risk were all similar in the two groups of pregnancies. However, hCG concentrations did appear to be higher in the group of Down syndrome pregnancies with anatomical anomalies (mean 1.74 MoM versus 1.19 MoM) (P<0.05). Overall, there was no significant difference in the incidence of major anomalies in patients with screen-positive test results versus those cases that were not identified by the triple test. Prenatal counseling should therefore reflect the general expectations of the Down syndrome phenotype that have been established from live-born infants with this disorder.

Cost-effectiveness of estimating gestational age by ultrasonography in Down syndrome screening

OBJECTIVE

To quantify the financial benefits of using ultrasound estimation of gestational age in maternal serum screening for Down syndrome.

METHODS

Maternal age-specific sensitivity and false-positive rates for Down syndrome were derived for the triple test (alpha-fetoprotein, hCG, and unconjugated estriol) using gestational age based on ultrasound dating and also time from the last menstrual period (LMP). These rates were entered into a formula to determine the societal financial net benefit of Down syndrome screening. The average per-case net benefits of ultrasound- and LMP-dated pregnancies were then compared. Average net benefits were also calculated separately with ultrasound versus LMP dating for triple tests referred to our laboratory, and the additional costs associated with any post-test ultrasound scans, repeat testing, or recalculations were estimated.

RESULTS

The use of ultrasound dating resulted in higher detection rates for Down syndrome and lower false-positive rates, which translated into an average per-case savings to society of $33.54. For women referred to our program with LMP dating, there was an average reduction of $31.60 in net benefits, plus added costs of $14.39 attributable to extra ultrasound, repeat testing, and recalculation.

CONCLUSION

When ultrasound dating is available before serum screening, it should be used preferentially to establish Down syndrome risk. Routine first-trimester ultrasound examination can be justified for women with a known LMP if the cost of the ultrasound examination is less than $46.

Maternal serum screening for fetal trisomy 18: a comparison of fixed cutoff and patient-specific risk protocols

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effectiveness of two widely used protocols for second-trimester screening for fetal trisomy 18.

METHODS

Second-trimester screening results for 41,565 women were reviewed to determine whether pregnancies could be considered to be at high risk for trisomy 18. The screening test was considered positive if either maternal serum concentrations of alpha-fetoprotein (MSAFP), hCG, and unconjugated estriol (E3) fell below defined levels, or the second-trimester patient-specific risk (based on maternal age and serum analytes) was greater than 1:100. Detection rates, false-positive rates, and pregnancy outcomes for the two protocols were compared.

RESULTS

The fixed-cutoff method showed a 23% detection rate and a 0.19% false-positive rate for trisomy 18. These low rates were in close agreement with a theoretical expectation for fixed-cutoff trisomy 18 screening. The risk-based approach resulted in a 69% detection rate and a 0.45% false-positive rate. Both methods identified pregnancies with other fetal anomalies.

CONCLUSION

Overall, the risk-based method is more effective than the fixed-cutoff approach to trisomy 18 screening.

X-chromosome abnormalities in women with premature ovarian failure

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the significance of X-chromosome abnormalities identified in a series of women with premature ovarian failure (POF).

STUDY DESIGN

Karyotypes were reviewed for all women referred to our cytogenetic laboratory over a five-year interval with the diagnosis of POF. Thirty women aged less than 40 with unexplained secondary amenorrhea and elevated follicle-stimulating hormone were included.

RESULTS

Of the 30 patients, 26 had a normal karyotype and 4 showed the following X-chromosome abnormalities: 46,Xi(Xq), 45,X/46,XX mosaic, 46,X,der(X)t(X;Y)(q28;q12) mat and 46,X,t(X;5)(q22;q11.2) mat. In the two families with familial translocations, carrier females within each family showed considerable variability in age at onset of menopause.

CONCLUSION

Both familial and nonfamilial X-chromosome abnormalities can be identified in women with POF. Cytogenetic studies should not be limited to those patients with very-early-onset POF.

45,X/46,XX mosaicism in patients with idiopathic premature ovarian failure

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether low-level 45,X/46,XX mosaicism may be present in some women with premature ovarian failure (POF).

DESIGN

Slide preparations were made from lymphocyte cultures stimulated with phytohemagglutinin, and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was then performed using a biotin-labeled X-chromosome probe.

SETTING

Cytogenetics laboratory.

PATIENT(S)

Fifteen women with idiopathic POF, 20 age-matched controls, and an additional 10 older control women with normal reproductive histories.

INTERVENTION(S)

Blood samples were collected.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

The number of X chromosomes present in each cell.

RESULT(S)

In patients with POF, the percentage of cells with a single X chromosome (mean, 5.50) was significantly greater than in the controls of similar age (mean, 2.42). For control subjects, there appeared to be a linear correlation between the number of cells with a single X chromosome and age.

CONCLUSION(S)

Some cases of POF may be attributable to low-level 45,X/46,XX mosaicism, which can be detected using FISH. In the lymphocytes from normal women, the rate of accumulation of cells with a single X chromosome was approximately 700 per 10(6) cells per year.

Preliminary evidence for associations between second-trimester human chorionic gonadotropin and unconjugated oestriol levels with pregnancy outcome in Down syndrome pregnancies

Fifty-six cases of Down syndrome were identified in a population of women who had undergone maternal serum triple marker screening [alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), and unconjugated oestriol (uE3) analyses]. These affected pregnancies represented all known cases present in the population of 34,368 women screened. Using a 1:270 mid-trimester Down syndrome risk to define the screen-positive group, 42 affected pregnancies were screen-positive (medians: AFP = 0.79 MOM, hCG = 2.13 MOM, uE3 = 0.62 MOM, age 34.6 years) and 14 pregnancies were screen-negative (medians: AFP = 0.82 MOM, hCG = 1.57 MOM, uE3 = 0.92 MOM, age 24.2 years). Four affected pregnancies were associated with in utero death and each of these cases was associated with relatively extreme values of AFP, hCG, and uE3, including the three highest levels of hCG in the entire series of Down syndrome pregnancies. Twenty-nine (15 screen-positive and 14 screen-negative) affected pregnancies resulted in liveborns. Down syndrome pregnancies had a significantly shorter gestational term than controls, and Down syndrome babies were also lighter than controls, even after adjustment for sex and gestational age. In affected pregnancies, a low uE3 level appeared to be associated with a greater chance of a small-for-gestational age baby. No correlations could be demonstrated between AFP or hCG levels and gestational age-adjusted term weight. Based on this small series, it would appear that uE3 may be particularly useful in detecting those Down syndrome cases associated with small-for-gestational age fetuses. A very high hCG value may indicate a higher probability of fetal death.

Down syndrome and neural tube defect screening: the value of using gestational age by ultrasonography

OBJECTIVE

Our goal was to determine whether gestational age should be based on ultrasonographic evaluation or last menstrual period data in the interpretation of second-trimester maternal serum screening for Down syndrome and open neural tube defects.

STUDY DESIGN

Initial and revised screen-positive rates and detection rates were reviewed for women undergoing triple-marker testing (maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein, human chorionic gonadotropin, and unconjugated estriol). The study population consisted of > 24,000 women at 15.0 to 21.9 weeks' gestation with approximately 60% of test interpretations based on ultrasonographic evaluation of gestational age. Gestational age and screening results were compared for 24 Down syndrome pregnancies in which both ultrasonography and last menstrual period dating were available.

RESULTS

Both initial and revised screen-positive rates for Down syndrome were significantly lower when ultrasonographic data were used compared with last menstrual period dating. The detection rate for Down syndrome appeared to be higher with ultrasonographic dating (approximately 76% vs 60% for last menstrual period dating). Down syndrome fetuses had a significantly shorter gestational age when evaluated by ultrasonography (relative to last menstrual period dating), but a similar trend was also seen in control pregnancies. Initial and revised screen-positive rates for open neural tube defects were higher for women who had received an ultrasonographic examination compared with the rates for those women referred with only last menstrual period data. The detection rates for open neural tube defects were similar for both methods of pregnancy dating.

CONCLUSION

By use of ultrasonographic measurement of gestational age, the number of amniocenteses performed to detect Down syndrome can be substantially reduced while detection rates are maintained or improved.

Angelman syndrome associated with an inversion of chromosome 15q11.2q24.3

Angelman syndrome (AS) most frequently results from large (> or = 5 Mb) de novo deletions of chromosome 15q11-q13. The deletions are exclusively of maternal origin, and a few cases of paternal uniparental disomy of chromosome 15 have been reported. The latter finding indicates that AS is caused by the absence of a maternal contribution to the imprinted 15q11-q13 region. Failure to inherit a paternal 15q11-q13 contribution results in the clinically distinct disorder of Prader-Willi syndrome. Cases of AS resulting from translocations or pericentric inversions have been observed to be associated with deletions, and there have been no confirmed reports of balanced rearrangements in AS. We report the first such case involving a paracentric inversion with a breakpoint located approximately 25 kb proximal to the reference marker D15S10. This inversion has been inherited from a phenotypically normal mother. No deletion is evident by molecular analysis in this case, by use of cloned fragments mapped to within approximately 1 kb of the inversion breakpoint. Several hypotheses are discussed to explain the relationship between the inversion and the AS phenotype.

Rare trisomy mosaicism diagnosed in amniocytes, involving an autosome other than chromosomes 13, 18, 20, and 21: karyotype/phenotype correlations

In order to determine the significance of trisomy mosaicism of an autosome other than chromosomes 13, 18, 20, and 21, 151 such cases diagnosed prenatally through amniocentesis were reviewed. These rare trisomy mosaicism cases include 54 from 17 cytogenetic laboratories, 34 from a previous North American mosaicism survey, and 63 from published reports. All were cases of true mosaicism with information available on pregnancy outcome, and with no evidence of biased ascertainment. There were 11 cases of 46/47, +2; 2 of 46/47, +3; 2 of 46/47, +4; 5 of 46/47, +5; 3 of 46/47, +6; 8 of 46/47, +7; 14 of 46/47, +8; 25 of 46/47, +9; 2 of 46/47, +11; 23 of 46/47, +12; 5 of 46/47, +14; 11 of 46/47, +15; 21 of 46/47, +16; 7 of 46/47, +17; 1 of 46/47, +19; and 11 of 46/47, +22. As to the risk of an abnormal outcome, the data showed a very high risk (> 60 per cent) for 46/47, +2, 46/47, +16, and 46/47, +22; a high risk (40-59 per cent) for 46/47, +5, 46/47, +9, 46/47, +14, and 46/47, +15; a moderately high risk (20-39 per cent) for 46/47, +12; a moderate risk (up to 19 per cent) for 46/47, +7 and 46/47, +7 and 46/47, +8; a low risk for 46/47, +17; and an undetermined risk, due to lack of cases, for the remaining autosomal trisomy mosaics. Most cases were evaluated at birth or at termination, so subtle abnormalities may have escaped detection and developmental retardation was not evaluated at all. Comparison of the phenotypes of prenatally diagnosed abnormal cases and postnatally diagnosed cases with the same diagnosis showed considerable concordance. Since the majority of anomalies noted are prenatally detectable with ultrasound, an ultrasound examination should be performed in all prenatally diagnosed cases. In cytogenetic confirmation studies, the data showed much higher confirmation rates in cases with abnormal outcomes than in cases with normal outcomes [81 per cent vs. 55 per cent for fibroblasts (from skin, fetal tissue, and/or cord); 88 per cent vs. 46 per cent for placental cells; 22 per cent vs. 10 per cent for blood cells]. The confirmation rate reached 85 per cent when both fibroblasts and placental tissues were studied in the same case (with trisomic cells found in one or the other, or both). Therefore, one must emphasize that both fibroblasts and placental tissues should be studied. Except for 46/47, +8 and 46/47, +9, PUBS is of limited value for prenatal diagnosis of rate trisomy mosaicism. DNA studies for UPD are suggested for certain chromosomes with established imprinting effects, such as chromosomes 7, 11, 14, and 15, and perhaps for chromosomes 2 and 16, where imprinting effects are likely.

Medians for second-trimester maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein, human chorionic gonadotropin, and unconjugated estriol; differences between races or ethnic groups

Second-trimester maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), and unconjugated estriol (uE3) are routinely measured in screening fetuses at high risk for Down syndrome or open neural tube defects (ONTD). For test interpretation, individual patient values of these three analytes are related to population-derived median values. We evaluated data from >21000 pregnancies to determine the extent of race-specific differences in median concentrations. For samples at most gestational ages, median AFP, hCG, and uE3 values for white, black, Hispanic, and other patients were all significantly different. Differences remained significant even when data were corrected for patient weights. For each analyte, the extent of the variation was not the same at different gestational ages. Differences in median values across race/ethnicity groups appear to have only a small impact in Down syndrome screening but it may be appropriate to use alternative sets of AFP medians or adjustment factors to AFP medians for some Asian populations receiving ONTD screening.