Development and validation of AI-assisted transcriptomic signatures to personalize adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

After surgical resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), patients are predominantly treated with adjuvant chemotherapy, commonly consisting of gemcitabine-based regimens or the modified FOLFIRINOX regimen (mFFX). While mFFX has been shown to be more effective than gemcitabine-based regimens, it is also associated with higher toxicity. Current treatment decisions are based on patient performance status rather than on the molecular characteristics of the tumor. To address this gap, the goal of this study was to develop drug-specific transcriptomic signatures for personalized chemotherapy treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We used PDAC datasets from preclinical models, encompassing chemotherapy response profiles for the mFFX-regimen components. From them we identified specific gene transcripts associated with chemotherapy response. Three transcriptomic AI-signatures were obtained by combining Independent Component Analysis, Least Absolute Shrinkage and the Selection Operator-Random Forest approach. We integrated a previously developed gemcitabine signature with three newly developed ones. The machine learning strategy employed to enhance these signatures incorporates transcriptomic features from the tumor microenvironment, leading to the development of the Pancreas-View tool ultimately clinically validated in a cohort of 343 patients from the PRODIGE-24/CCTG PA6 trial.

RESULTS

Patients who were predicted to be sensitive to the administered drugs (n=164; 47.8%) had longer disease-free survival (DFS) than the other patients. The median DFS in the mFFX sensitive group treated with mFFX was 50.0 months (stratified HR: 0.31; 95% CI, 0.21-0.44; p<0.001) and 33.7 months (stratified HR: 0.40; 95% CI, 0.17-0.59; p<0.001) in the gemcitabine sensitive group when treated with gemcitabine. Comparatively patients with signature predictions unmatched with the treatments (n=86; 25.1%) or those resistant to all drugs (n=93; 27.1%) had shorter DFS (10.6 and 10.8 months, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

This study presents a transcriptome-based tool that was developed using preclinical models and machine learning to accurately predict sensitivity to mFFX and gemcitabine.

Diagnosis and treatment of bacterial peritonitis in patients with gastrointestinal cancer: an observational multicenter study

Background

Bacterial peritonitis (BP) in patients with gastrointestinal (GI) cancer has been poorly described, and its prevalence is unknown.

Objectives

This study aimed to evaluate in patients with both GI cancer and ascites the prevalence of BP, associated features, mechanisms, prognosis, and the diagnostic performance of neutrophil count in ascites.

Design

A retrospective, multicenter, observational study.

Methods

All patients with GI cancer and ascites who underwent at least one paracentesis sample analyzed for bacteriology over a 1-year period were included. BP was defined by a positive ascites culture combined with clinical and/or biological signs compatible with infection. Secondary BP was defined as BP related to a direct intra-abdominal infectious source.

Results

Five hundred fifty-seven ascites from 208 patients included were analyzed. Twenty-eight patients had at least one episode of BP and the annual prevalence rate of BP was 14%. Among the 28 patients with BP, 19 (65%) patients had proven secondary BP and 17 (59%) patients had multi-microbial BP, mainly due to Enterobacterales. A neutrophil count greater than 110/mm3 in ascites had negative and positive predictive values of 96% and 39%, respectively, for the diagnosis of BP. The median survival of patients with BP was 10 days (interquartile range 6-40) after the diagnosis.

Conclusion

BP is not rare in patients with GI cancer and is associated with a poor short-term prognosis. When a patient with GI cancer is diagnosed with BP, a secondary cause should be sought. Further studies are needed to better define the best management of these patients.

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors in French VHL mutation carriers: a multicentric retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Von Hippel-Lindau disease (VHL) is a rare autosomal dominant hereditary cancer-predisposition syndrome caused by germline pathogenic variants (PV) in VHL gene. It is associated with a high penetrance of benign and malignant vascular tumors in multiples organs, including pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs), whose long-term natural history is ill-known.

METHODS

Patients with both documented germline PV in VHL gene and PanNETs included in the French PREDIR database between 1995 and 2022 were included. Primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with PanNET-related metastases and secondary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Genotype/phenotype correlations were studied.

RESULTS

We included 121 patients with 259 PanNETs. Median age at diagnosis was 38 years. Median follow-up was 89.5 months. PanNET surgical resection was performed in 51 patients. Overall, 29 patients (24%) had metastases (5 synchronous, 10 metachronous), with a higher risk in case of larger PanNET size (p=0.0089; best threshold 28 mm) and grade 2 PanNET (p=0.048), and a pejorative prognostic impact (p=0.043). Patients with PV in VHL exon 1 had larger PanNETs (p=0.018), more often metastatic disease (48% vs 11.5%; p < 0.001) and a trend toward shorter OS (p=0.16).

CONCLUSION

The risk of metastases associated to VHL-related PanNETs remains low (24%) but increases with tumor size >28 mm, higher grade and in case of PV located VHL exon 1. These data might help improving the management of these patients, who should be referred to an expert center.

Activation of lysosomal iron triggers ferroptosis in cancer

Iron catalyses the oxidation of lipids in biological membranes and promotes a form of cell death referred to as ferroptosis1-3. Identifying where this chemistry takes place in the cell can inform the design of drugs capable of inducing or inhibiting ferroptosis in various disease-relevant settings. Whereas genetic approaches have revealed underlying mechanisms of lipid peroxide detoxification1,4,5, small molecules can provide unparalleled spatiotemporal control of the chemistry at work6. Here, we show that the ferroptosis inhibitor liproxstatin-1 (Lip-1) exerts a protective activity by inactivating iron in lysosomes. Based on this, we designed the bifunctional compound fentomycin that targets phospholipids at the plasma membrane and activates iron in lysosomes upon endocytosis, promoting oxidative degradation of phospholipids and ferroptosis. Fentomycin effectively kills primary sarcoma and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma cells. It acts as a lipolysis-targeting chimera (LIPTAC), preferentially targeting iron-rich CD44high cell-subpopulations7,8 associated with the metastatic disease and drug resistance9,10. Furthermore, we demonstrate that fentomycin also depletes CD44high cells in vivo and reduces intranodal tumour growth in an immunocompetent murine model of breast cancer metastasis. These data demonstrate that lysosomal iron triggers ferroptosis and that lysosomal iron redox chemistry can be exploited for therapeutic benefits.

Prediction of Adjuvant Gemcitabine Sensitivity in Resectable Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Using the GemPred RNA Signature: An Ancillary Study of the PRODIGE-24/CCTG PA6 Clinical Trial

PURPOSE

GemPred, a transcriptomic signature predictive of the efficacy of adjuvant gemcitabine (GEM), was developed from cell lines and organoids and validated retrospectively. The phase III PRODIGE-24/CCTG PA6 trial has demonstrated the superiority of modified folinic acid, fluorouracil, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin (mFOLFIRINOX) over GEM as adjuvant therapy in patients with resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma at the expense of higher toxicity. We evaluated the potential predictive value of GemPred in this population.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Routine formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded surgical specimens of 350 patients were retrieved for RNA sequencing and GemPred prediction (167 in the GEM arm and 183 in the mFOLFIRINOX [mFFX] arm). Survival analyses were stratified by resection margins, lymph node status, and cancer antigen 19-9 level.

RESULTS

Eighty-nine patients' tumors (25.5%) were GemPred+ and were thus predicted to be gemcitabine-sensitive. In the GEM arm, GemPred+ patients (n = 50, 30%) had a significantly longer disease-free survival (DFS) than GemPred- patients (n = 117, 70%; median 27.3 v 10.2 months, hazard ratio [HR], 0.43 [95% CI, 0.29 to 0.65]; P < .001) and cancer-specific survival (CSS; median 68.4 v 28.6 months, HR, 0.42 [95% CI, 0.27 to 0.66]; P < .001). GemPred had no prognostic value in the mFFX arm. DFS and CSS were similar in GemPred+ patients who received adjuvant GEM and mFFX (median 27.3 v 24.0 months, and 68.4 v 51.4 months, respectively). The statistical interaction between GEM and GemPred+ status was significant for DFS (P = .008) and CSS (P = .004). GemPred+ patients had significantly more adverse events of grade ≥3 in the mFFX arm (76%) compared with those in the GEM arm (40%; P = .001).

CONCLUSION

This ancillary study of a phase III randomized trial demonstrates that among the quarter of patients with a GemPred-positive transcriptomic signature, survival was comparable with that of mFOLFIRINOX, whereas those receiving adjuvant gemcitabine had fewer adverse events.

The immunological landscape in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and overcoming resistance to immunotherapy

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is associated with a poor prognosis and there are few treatment options. The development of immunotherapy in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma has been difficult, and immune checkpoint inhibitors are only effective in a very small subset of patients. Most obstacles for treatment have been related to intertumoural and intratumoural heterogeneity, the composition of tumour stroma, and crosstalk with cancer cells. Improved molecular characterisation of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and a better understanding of its microenvironment have paved the way for novel immunotherapy strategies, including the identification of predictive biomarkers, the development of rational combinations to optimise effectiveness, and the targeting of new mechanisms. Future immunotherapy strategies should consider individual characteristics to move beyond the traditional immune targets and circumvent the resistance to therapies that have been developed so far.

Effect of Adapted Physical Activity in Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: The APACaP GERCOR Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND

The impact of adapted physical activity (APA) on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (aPDAC) is unknown. This study evaluated whether APA in addition to standard care improved HRQoL in patients who have aPDAC who are receiving first-line chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with locally advanced/metastatic PDAC and an ECOG performance status of 0 to 2 were randomized (1:1) to receive standard care (standard arm) or standard care plus a home-based 16-week APA program (APA arm). The primary objective was the effect of the APA program on 3 dimensions of the EORTC QLQ-C30: global health status, physical function, and fatigue at week 16 (W16), with a one-sided type I error of 0.017 for each dimension. The primary HRQoL analysis was performed in patients with available baseline and W16 scores for the dimensions (ie, the modified intention-to-treat population 1 [mITT1]), and secondary longitudinal HRQoL analyses using the mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) and time until definitive deterioration (TUDD) methods were performed in the mITT1 population and in patients with baseline and at least one follow-up questionnaire (mITT2 population). A difference of ≥5 points was considered to be clinically relevant.

RESULTS

Of 326 included patients, 313 were randomized to the standard (n=157) or APA (n=156) arms. In the mITT1 population (n=172), the mean differences in global health status, physical function, and fatigue at W16 adjusted from baseline were -0.98 (SD, 23.9; P=.39), -2.08 (SD, 21.3; P=.26), and 4.16 (SD, 29.2; P=.17), respectively, showing a non-statistically significant benefit with APA. In the mITT2 population (n=259), APA was associated with statistically significant and clinically relevant improvement in 5 and 8 dimensions of the HRQoL in the longitudinal MMRM and TUDD analyses, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

APA improved several dimensions of HRQoL in patients with aPDAC receiving first-line chemotherapy and standard care.

Germline BRCA testing in pancreatic cancer: improving awareness, timing, turnaround, and uptake

Prognosis is generally poor for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. However, patients with germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations (gBRCAm) may benefit from first-line platinum-based chemotherapy and maintenance therapy with the poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase inhibitor olaparib following at least 16 weeks of first-line platinum-based chemotherapy without disease progression. Germline breast cancer gene (BRCA) testing is therefore important to ensure that patients receive the most effective treatment. In addition, testing for other DNA damage response gene mutations beyond gBRCAm may also guide treatment decisions. However, clinical pathways for genetic testing are often suboptimal, leading to delays in treatment initiation or missed opportunities for personalized therapy. Barriers to testing include low rates of referral and uptake, delays to referral and slow result turnaround times, cost, and biopsy and assay limitations if somatic testing is performed, leading to the requirement for subsequent dedicated germline testing. Low rates of referral may result from lack of awareness among physicians of the clinical value of testing, coupled with low confidence in interpreting test results and poor availability of genetic counseling services. Among patients, barriers to uptake may include similar lack of awareness of the clinical value of testing, anxiety regarding the implications of test results, lack of insurance coverage, fear of negative insurance implications, and socioeconomic factors. Potential solutions include innovative approaches to testing pathways, including 'mainstreaming' of testing in which BRCA tests are routinely arranged by the treating oncologist, with the involvement of genetic counselors if a patient is found to have a gBRCAm. More recently, the utility of multigene panel analyses has also been explored. Access to genetic counseling may also be improved through initiatives such as having a genetic counseling appointment for all new patient visits and telemedicine approaches, including the use of telephone consultations or DVD-assisted counseling. Educational programs will also be beneficial, and cost effectiveness is likely to improve as the number of targeted treatments increases and when the earlier detection of tumors in family members following cascade testing is considered.

OPERA: perception of information in patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors on lanreotide autogel

IMPORTANCE

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) can affect patient health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Appropriate information may improve their adherence to treatment and quality of life.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the change in patient's perceptions of the level of information at lanreotide (LAN) treatment initiation for GEP-NETs vs after 6 months.

DESIGN

OPERA (NCT03562091) was a prospective, longitudinal, noninterventional study.

SETTING

Thirty-one centers in France specialized in the management of patients with NETs.

INTERVENTION

Planned clinical visits at enrollment and end-of-study visits at month 6, with completion of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer 25-item Quality of Life Questionnaire-Information Module (QLQ-INFO25) and 30-item Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core.

MAIN OUTCOME

Absolute change in the patient's perception of the information between baseline and month 6, using the relevant domains of the QLQ-INFO25. Endpoints measured at baseline and month 6 for at least 1 of the 3 targeted QLQ-INFO25 dimensions of the primary endpoint.

RESULTS

Ninety-three of the 115 patients enrolled completed ≥1 primary endpoint information dimension. Mean (SD) scores for the primary endpoint information dimensions were high at baseline (disease, 63.41 [20.71]; treatment, 58.85 [19.00]; supportive care, 26.53 [24.69]; maximum 100). There were no significant changes between baseline (98.34% CI) and 6 months (disease, -2.84 [-8.69, 3.01; P = .24]; treatment, -4.37 [-11.26, 2.52; P = .13]; supportive care, 0.46 [-6.78, 7.70; P = .88]), and in HRQoL between baseline and 6 months.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The lack of change in patient's perceptions of the disease, treatment, and supportive care information provided over the first 6 months of LAN treatment may suggest that physicians provided adequate information at the treatment initiation.

Evaluation of the interest to combine a CD4 Th1-inducer cancer vaccine derived from telomerase and atezolizumab plus bevacizumab in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomized non-comparative phase II study (TERTIO - PRODIGE 82)

BACKGROUND

Several cancer immunotherapies that target the PD-L1/PD-1 pathway show promising clinical activity in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the standard of care in first-line treatment with atezolizumab (anti-PD-L1 therapy) in combination with bevacizumab is associated with a limited objective response rate. Telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) activation meets the criteria of oncogenic addiction in HCC and could be actionable therapeutic target and a relevant tumor antigen. Therefore we hypothesized that combining anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy with an anti-telomerase vaccine might be an attractive therapy in HCC. UCPVax is a therapeutic cancer vaccine composed of two separate peptides derived from telomerase (human TERT). UCPVax has been evaluated in a multicenter phase I/II study in non-small cell lung cancers and has demonstrated to be safe and immunogenic, and is under evaluation in combination with atezolizumab in a phase II clinical trial in tumors where telomerase reactivation contributes to an oncogene addiction (HPV⁺ cancers). The aim of the TERTIO study is to determine the clinical interest and immunological efficacy of a treatment combining the CD4 helper T-inducer cancer anti-telomerase vaccine (UCPVax) with atezolizumab and bevacizumab in unresectable HCC in a multicenter randomized phase II study.

METHODS

Patients with locally advanced, metastatic or unresectable HCC who have not previously received systemic anti-cancer treatment are eligible. The primary end point is the objective response rate at 6 months. Patients will be allocated to a treatment arm with a randomization 2:1. In both arms, patients will receive atezolizumab at fixed dose of 1200 mg IV infusion and bevacizumab at fixed dose of 15 mg/kg IV infusion, every 3 weeks, according to the standard of care. In the experimental arm, these treatments will be combined with the UCPVax vaccine at 0.5 mg subcutaneously.

DISCUSSION

Combining anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy with an anti-telomerase vaccine gains serious consideration in HCC, in order to extend the clinical efficacy of anti-PD-1/PD-L1. Indeed, anti-cancer vaccines can induce tumor-specific T cell expansion and activation and therefore restore the cancer-immunity cycle in patients lacking pre-existing anti-tumor responses. Thus, there is a strong rational to combine immune checkpoint blockade therapy and anticancer vaccine (UCPVax) in order to activate antitumor T cell immunity and bypass the immunosuppression in the tumor microenvironment in HCC. This pivotal proof of concept study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination of a CD4 Th1-inducer cancer vaccine derived from telomerase (UCPVax) and atezolizumab plus bevacizumab in unresectable HCC, as well as confirming their synergic mechanism, and settling the basis for a new combination for future clinical trials.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT05528952.

Pacpaint: a histology-based deep learning model uncovers the extensive intratumor molecular heterogeneity of pancreatic adenocarcinoma

Two tumor (Classical/Basal) and stroma (Inactive/active) subtypes of Pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) with prognostic and theragnostic implications have been described. These molecular subtypes were defined by RNAseq, a costly technique sensitive to sample quality and cellularity, not used in routine practice. To allow rapid PDAC molecular subtyping and study PDAC heterogeneity, we develop PACpAInt, a multi-step deep learning model. PACpAInt is trained on a multicentric cohort (n = 202) and validated on 4 independent cohorts including biopsies (surgical cohorts n = 148; 97; 126 / biopsy cohort n = 25), all with transcriptomic data (n = 598) to predict tumor tissue, tumor cells from stroma, and their transcriptomic molecular subtypes, either at the whole slide or tile level (112 µm squares). PACpAInt correctly predicts tumor subtypes at the whole slide level on surgical and biopsies specimens and independently predicts survival. PACpAInt highlights the presence of a minor aggressive Basal contingent that negatively impacts survival in 39% of RNA-defined classical cases. Tile-level analysis ( > 6 millions) redefines PDAC microheterogeneity showing codependencies in the distribution of tumor and stroma subtypes, and demonstrates that, in addition to the Classical and Basal tumors, there are Hybrid tumors that combine the latter subtypes, and Intermediate tumors that may represent a transition state during PDAC evolution.

Multicentre, interventional, single-arm study protocol of telemonitored circadian rhythms and patient-reported outcomes for improving mFOLFIRINOX safety in patients with pancreatic cancer (MultiDom, NCT04263948)

INTRODUCTION

Circadian clocks regulate cellular proliferation and drug effects. Tolerability and/or efficacy of anticancer therapies have been improved by their administration according to circadian rhythms, while being predicted by circadian robustness. The combination of leucovorin, fluorouracil, irinotecan and oxaliplatin (mFOLFIRINOX) is a standard treatment for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), that generates grades 3-4 adverse events in the majority of patients and an estimated 15%-30% emergency admission rate. The MultiDom study evaluates whether mFOLFIRINOX safety can be improved using a novel circadian-based telemonitoring-telecare platform in patients at home. The detection of early warning signals of clinical toxicities could guide their early management, possibly preventing emergency hospital admissions.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This multicentre, interventional, prospective, longitudinal, single-arm study hypothesises that the mFOLFIRINOX-related emergency admission rate will be 5% (95% CI 1.7% to 13.7%), among 67 patients with advanced PDAC. Study participation is 7 weeks for each patient, including a reference week before chemotherapy onset and 6 weeks afterwards. Accelerometry and body temperature are measured q1-min using a continuously worn telecommunicating chest surface sensor, daily body weight is self-measured with a telecommunicating balance and 23 electronic patient-reported outcomes (e-PROs) are self-rated using a tablet. Hidden Markov model, spectral analyses and other algorithms automatically compute physical activity, sleep, temperature, body weight change, e-PRO severity and 12 circadian sleep/activity parameters, including the dichotomy index I<O (% activity 'in-bed' below median activity 'out-of-bed'), once to four times daily. Health professionals access visual displays of near-real time parameter dynamics and receive automatic alerts, with trackable digital follow-up.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study has been approved by the National Agency for Medication and Health Product Safety (ANSM) and Ethics Committee West V (2 July 2019; third amendment, 14 June 2022). The data will be disseminated at conferences and in peer-reviewed journals and will support large-scale randomised evaluation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS

NCT04263948 and ID RCB-2019-A00566-51.

Chemotherapy in advanced pancreatic adenosquamous carcinoma: A retrospective multicenter AGEO study

Pancreatic adenosquamous carcinoma (PASC) account for <5% of pancreatic malignancies. The efficacy of modern chemotherapy regimens in patients with advanced PASC is unknown. Patients with advanced PASC from 2008 to 2021 were consecutively included in this retrospective multicenter study. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier method. Ninety-four PASC from 16 French centers were included (median age, 67.3 years; males, 56.4%; metastatic disease, 85.1%). The first-line treatment was chemotherapy for 79 patients (84.0%) (37 FOLFIRINOX (FX), 7 Gemcitabine-nab paclitaxel (GN) and 35 for all other regimen) or best supportive care (BSC) alone for 15 patients (16.0%). No significant difference was observed between FX and GN in terms of PFS (P = .67) or OS (P = .5). Modern regimens pooled together (FX and GN) as compared to all others chemotherapy regimens showed an improvement of overall response rate (39.5% and 9.7%, P = .002), PFS (median, 7.8 vs 4.7 months, P = .02) and OS (median, 12.7 vs 9.2 months, P = .35). This large study evaluating first-line treatment regimens in advanced PASC suggests that modern regimens as FX or GN may be preferable to all other chemotherapy regimens. These results deserve confirmation in prospective studies.

Efficacy and tolerance of LV5FU2-carboplatin chemotherapy in patients with advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma after failure of standard regimens

Background:

Chemotherapy options in patients with advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) after failure of standard chemotherapies are limited.

Objectives:

We aimed to report the efficacy and safety of the leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil (LV5FU2) and carboplatin combination in this setting.

Design:

We performed a retrospective study including consecutive patients with advanced PDAC who received LV5FU2–carboplatin between 2009 and 2021 in an expert center.

Methods:

We measured overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), and explored associated factors using Cox proportional hazard models.

Results:

In all, 91 patients were included (55% male, median age 62), with a performance status of 0/1 in 74% of cases. LV5FU2–carboplatin was mainly used in third (59.3%) or fourth line (23.1%), with three (interquartile range: 2.0–6.0) cycles administered on average. The clinical benefit rate was 25.2%. Median PFS was 2.7 months (95% CI: 2.4–3.0). At multivariable analysis, no extrahepatic metastases (p = 0.083), no ascites or opioid-requiring pain (p = 0.023), <2 prior treatment lines (p < 0.001), full dose of carboplatin (p = 0.004), and treatment initiation >18 months after initial diagnosis (p < 0.001) were associated with longer PFS. Median OS was 4.2 months (95% CI: 3.48–4.92) and was influenced by the presence of extrahepatic metastases (p = 0.058), opioid-requiring pain or ascites (p = 0.039), and number of prior treatment lines (0.065). Prior tumor response under oxaliplatin did not impact either PFS or OS. Worsening of preexisting residual neurotoxicity was infrequent (13.2%). The most common grade 3–4 adverse events were neutropenia (24.7%) and thrombocytopenia (11.8%).

Conclusion:

Although the efficacy of LV5FU2–carboplatin appears limited in patients with pretreated advanced PDAC, it may be beneficial in selected patients.

Assessment of an emergency 14-day (d) integrative supportive care program (14-EISCP) followed by early chemotherapy (CTx) in symptomatic patients (pts) with advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (aPDAC): A prospective ARCAD cohort study

700

Background: Pts with aPDAC often have general health impairment due to high symptom burden at diagnosis. We investigated prospectively the clinical benefit (CB) of an EISCP followed by CTx as early as suspicion of aPDAC in pts with ECOG performance status (PS)≥2. Methods: In this multicenter study, PS≥2 pts with pathologically confirmed or suspected aPDAC on imaging were included at first oncology visit (V1) in a personalized 14-d EISCP including pain, nutritional, diagnostic/stenting procedures. Post-EISCP PS≤1 pts received mFOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine(Gem)/Nab-paclitaxel(NP), PS≥2 received mFOLFOX7 or investigator choice CTx or best supportive care (BSC). The primary endpoint was the 14-EISCP success on both feasibility of procedures within 14-d±2 and CB defined by post-EISCP PS≤1, ≥5 points improvement of either fatigue/pain/global health EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL quality of life (QOL) scores, or CTx start ≤30d, aiming 59% success for clinical relevance. Secondary endpoint included uni/multivariate median overall survival (mOS) analyses. Results: As of 07/2022, 106 pts were included; 93 pts were evaluable for primary endpoint: male 46%, mean age 74 yrs, PS2/3 79%/21%, metastases (M1) 62%, pathological diagnosis needed 53%, biliary stenting 16%. V1 mean QOL global health score was 48±23. mOS was 4.1 months (IC95 2.8-5.7). The 14-d feasibility was achieved in 71%. Post-EISCP CB was observed in 82% of pts: 13%, PS improvement to 0/1, 23% QOL improvement and/or 73% CTx start ≤30-d. Eight pts (9%) died during the EISCP. The primary endpoint was achieved in 59% of pts (n=55). Overall, 17 pts (16%) received mFOLFIRINOX/GemNP, 32 (30%) FOLFOX, 29 (27%) Gem or 5FU alone, and 28 (27%) BSC. OS analyses are shown. At d30, pts receiving CTx had a mean change of QOL global health score from 51±23 to 60±23. Conclusions: In PS≥2 pts with aPDAC, a personalized 14-EISCP is feasible and lead to a meaningful CB allowing the administration of doublet/triplet CTx in nearly half of the pts. Pts starting CTx within 30d had improved OS. Clinical trial information: NCT02979483 . [Table: see text]

Identification of a large intra-exonic deletion in BRCA2 exon 18 in a pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

By 2030, pancreatic cancer will become the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the United States and in Europe. The management of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer relies on chemotherapy and poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors for patients who carry BRCA1/2 inactivating alterations. Some variants, such as large insertion/deletions (Indels), inactivating BRCA1/2 and therefore of clinical relevance can be hard to detect by next-generation sequencing techniques. Here we report a 47-year-old patient presenting with pancreatic cancer whose tumour harbours a large somatic intra-exonic deletion of BRCA2 of 141 bp. This BRCA2 deletion, located in the C-terminal domain, can be considered as pathogenic and consequently affect tumorigenesis because it is involved in the interaction between the DSS1 protein and DNA. Thanks to the optimized bioinformatics algorithm, this intermediate size deletion in BRCA2 was identified, enabling personalized patient management via the inclusion of the patients in a clinical trial.

Overall Survival Results From the POLO Trial: A Phase III Study of Active Maintenance Olaparib Versus Placebo for Germline BRCA-Mutated Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer

PURPOSE

The phase III POLO study demonstrated significant progression-free survival (PFS) benefit for active olaparib maintenance therapy versus placebo for patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma and a germline BRCA mutation. Here, we report the final analysis of overall survival (OS) and other secondary end points.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with a deleterious or suspected deleterious germline BRCA mutation whose disease had not progressed after ≥ 16 weeks of first-line platinum-based chemotherapy were randomly assigned 3:2 to active maintenance olaparib (300 mg twice daily) or placebo. The primary end point was PFS; secondary end points included OS, time to second disease progression or death, time to first and second subsequent cancer therapies or death, time to discontinuation of study treatment or death, and safety and tolerability.

RESULTS

In total, 154 patients were randomly assigned (olaparib, n = 92; placebo, n = 62). No statistically significant OS benefit was observed (median 19.0 v 19.2 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.83; 95% CI, 0.56 to 1.22; P = .3487). Kaplan-Meier OS curves separated at approximately 24 months, and the estimated 3-year survival after random assignment was 33.9% versus 17.8%, respectively. Median time to first subsequent cancer therapy or death (HR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.30 to 0.66; P < .0001), time to second subsequent cancer therapy or death (HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.42 to 0.89; P = .0111), and time to discontinuation of study treatment or death (HR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.29 to 0.63; P < .0001) significantly favored olaparib. The HR for second disease progression or death favored olaparib without reaching statistical significance (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.43 to 1.02; P = .0613). Olaparib was well tolerated with no new safety signals.

CONCLUSION

Although no statistically significant OS benefit was observed, the HR numerically favored olaparib, which also conferred clinically meaningful benefits including increased time off chemotherapy and long-term survival in a subset of patients.

Five-Year Outcomes of FOLFIRINOX vs Gemcitabine as Adjuvant Therapy for Pancreatic Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Early results at 3 years from the PRODIGE 24/Canadian Cancer Trials Group PA6 randomized clinical trial showed survival benefits with adjuvant treatment with modified FOLFIRINOX vs gemcitabine in patients with resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma; mature data are now available.

Objective

To report 5-year outcomes and explore prognostic factors for overall survival.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This open-label, phase 3 randomized clinical trial was conducted at 77 hospitals in France and Canada and included patients aged 18 to 79 years with histologically confirmed pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma who had undergone complete macroscopic (R0/R1) resection within 3 to 12 weeks before randomization. Patients were included from April 16, 2012, through October 3, 2016. The cutoff date for this analysis was June 28, 2021.

Interventions

A total of 493 patients were randomized (1:1) to receive treatment with modified FOLFIRINOX (oxaliplatin, 85 mg/m2 of body surface area; irinotecan, 150-180 mg/m2; leucovorin, 400 mg/m2; and fluorouracil, 2400 mg/m2, every 2 weeks) or gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2, days 1, 8, and 15, every 4 weeks) as adjuvant therapy for 24 weeks.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Primary end point was disease-free survival. Secondary end points included overall survival, metastasis-free survival, and cancer-specific survival. Prognostic factors for overall survival were determined.

Results

Of the 493 patients, 216 (43.8%) were women, and the mean (SD) age was 62.0 (8.9) years. At a median of 69.7 months' follow-up, 367 disease-free survival events were observed. In patients receiving chemotherapy with modified FOLFIRINOX vs gemcitabine, median disease-free survival was 21.4 months (95% CI, 17.5-26.7) vs 12.8 months (95% CI, 11.6-15.2) (hazard ratio [HR], 0.66; 95% CI, 0.54-0.82; P < .001) and 5-year disease-free survival was 26.1% vs 19.0%; median overall survival was 53.5 months (95% CI, 43.5-58.4) vs 35.5 months (95% CI, 30.1-40.3) (HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.54-0.85; P = .001), and 5-year overall survival was 43.2% vs 31.4%; median metastasis-free survival was 29.4 months (95% CI, 21.4-40.1) vs 17.7 months (95% CI, 14.0-21.2) (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.52-0.80; P < .001); and median cancer-specific survival was 54.7 months (95% CI, 45.8-68.4) vs 36.3 months (95% CI, 30.5-43.9) (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.51-0.82; P < .001). Multivariable analysis identified modified FOLFIRINOX, age, tumor grade, tumor staging, and larger-volume center as significant favorable prognostic factors for overall survival. Shorter relapse delay was an adverse prognostic factor.

Conclusions and Relevance

The final 5-year results from the PRODIGE 24/Canadian Cancer Trials Group PA6 randomized clinical trial indicate that adjuvant treatment with modified FOLFIRINOX yields significantly longer survival than gemcitabine in patients with resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Trial Registration

EudraCT: 2011-002026-52; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01526135.

Time interval from last visit to imaging diagnosis influences outcome in pancreatic adenocarcinoma: A regional population-based study on linked medico-administrative and clinical data

Background:

Excessive waiting time intervals for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with pancreatic cancer can influence their prognosis but they remain unclear. The objective was to describe time intervals from the medical visit to diagnostic imaging and to treatment and their prognostic impact in pancreatic cancer in one French region.

Methods:

This retrospective observational multicentre study included all patients with pancreatic cancer seen for the first time in 2017 in multidisciplinary team meetings (MTMs), where clinical data were collected. A probabilistic matching with the medico-administrative data from the French national healthcare database (Système National des Données de Santé) was performed to define the care pathway from clinical presentation to the beginning of treatment. Median key time intervals were estimated for both resected and unresected tumours. Factors associated with 1-year survival were studied using Cox model.

Results:

A total of 324 patients (88% of total patients with MTM presentation) were matched and included: male 54%, mean age 72 years ±9.2, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) PS > 1 19.5%, metastatic disease at diagnosis 47.4%, tumour resection 16%. At 1 year, 57% had died (65% in the unresected group and 17% in the resected group). The median time interval from the medical visit to diagnostic imaging was 15 days [Q1–Q3: 8–44]. After imaging, median time intervals to definite diagnosis and to first treatment were 11 and 20 days, respectively. Significant prognostic factors associated with the risk of death at 1 year were ECOG PS > 1 (hazard ratio (HR) 2.1 [1.4–3.0]), metastasis (HR 2.7 [1.9–3.9]), no tumour resection (HR 2.7 [1.3–5.6]) and time interval between the medical visit and diagnostic imaging ⩾25 days (HR 1.7 [1.2–2.3]).

Conclusion:

Delay in access to diagnostic imaging impacted survival in patients with pancreatic cancer, regardless of whether tumour resection had been performed.

Therapeutic advances in metastatic pancreatic cancer: a focus on targeted therapies

Mortality from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is increasing worldwide and effective new treatments are urgently needed. The current treatment of metastatic PDAC in fit patients is based on two chemotherapy combinations (FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel) which were validated more than 8 years ago. Although almost all treatments targeting specific molecular alterations have failed so far when administered to unselected patients, encouraging results were observed in the small subpopulations of patients with germline BRCA 1/2 mutations, and somatic gene fusions (neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase, Neuregulin 1, which are enriched in KRAS wild-type PDAC), KRAS G12C mutations, or microsatellite instability. While targeted tumor metabolism therapies and immunotherapy have been disappointing, they are still under investigation in combination with other drugs. Optimizing pharmacokinetics and adapting available chemotherapies based on molecular signatures are other promising avenues of research. This review evaluates the current expectations and limits of available treatments and analyses the existing trials. A permanent search for actionable vulnerabilities in PDAC tumor cells and microenvironments will probably result in a more personalized therapeutic approach, keeping in mind that supportive care must also play a major role if real clinical efficacy is to be achieved in these patients.

Adapted physical activity in patients (Pts) with advanced pancreatic cancer (APACaP): Results from a prospective national randomized GERCOR trial

4007

Background: The benefit of adapted physical activity (APA) on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in Pts with advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (aPDAC) treated by chemotherapy (CTx) has never been prospectively assessed. Methods: Pts with aPDAC and ECOG performance status (PS) 0–2 were randomized 1:1 to receive usual care (UC) including first-line CTx at the investigator’s choice (standard arm), or UC plus a home-based 16-week APA program (APA arm). The APA program consisted of personalized aerobic and resistance exercises, with a weekly remote supervision by an APA professional trainer, and unsupervised sessions with a family member or friend (APA partner). The primary objective was the effect on HRQoL at week 16 (W16) measured by 3 dimensions of the EORTC QLQ-C30, global health status (GHS), physical functioning (PF), and fatigue (FA), with a one-sided type I error of 0.016 for each dimension. The primary HRQoL analysis was performed in Pts with available baseline and W16 scores for the 3 targeted dimensions (mITT1). Secondary analyses of HRQoL changes by the mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) and time until definitive deterioration (TUDD) methods included Pts with baseline and ≥1 follow-up score (mITT2). Differences > 5 points in scores were considered clinically significant. Results: A total of 313 Pts (median age: 64 years; men: 55%, ECOG PS 0-1: 93%; metastatic: 77%; FOLFIRINOX: 78%, gemcitabine-based: 13%) were included from 11/2014 to 10/2020 (standard arm: n = 157, APA arm: n = 156). In the mITT1 population (n = 172), mean differences in HRQoL at W16 adjusted from baseline were -0.98 (SD 23.87; p = 0.39), -2.08 (SD 21.34; p = 0.26), and 4.16 (SD 29.18; p = 0.18) for GHS, PF, and FA, respectively. In the mITT2 population (n = 259), APA was associated with significant improvements in 5 (GHS, PF, cognitive functioning [CF], social functioning [SF], appetite loss) and 8 (GHS, CF, emotional functioning [EF], SF, insomnia, constipation, pain, financial difficulties) dimensions of HRQoL by MMRM and TUDD, respectively (Table). Secondary endpoints, including overall survival, progression-free survival, and chemotherapy toxicity will be presented. Conclusions: APA in combination with usual care improved several dimensions of HRQoL in Pts with aPDAC receiving first-line CTx. Clinical trial information: NCT02184663. [Table: see text]

Optimal cytoreductive LIVER surgery for unresectable colorectal liver metastases: A prospective observational study

3570

Background: Patients with multiple colorectal liver metastases (CLM) involving all the hepatic segments are currently not eligible for potentially curative liver surgery. Transplantation is a promising alternative but graft shortage and stringent selection criteria limit its accessibility. Owing to the improving efficacy of chemotherapy, the impossibility to resect all the initial metastatic sites could lead to revisit the role of optimal cytoreductive liver surgery (CLS) aiming to treat by resection ± radiofrequency, all the macroscopic residual tumors after a good response to chemotherapy. Although validated for ovarian cancer and peritoneal carcinomatosis, this strategy remains unexplored in CLM. Our objective was to evaluate the outcome of this strategy in patients with definitively unresectable CLM. Methods: Within a prospective monocentric study, we enrolled for debulking surgery, between 2017 and 2021, all consecutive patients with multinodular unresectable CLM involving all segments on initial imaging and consequently ineligible for a curative surgery either after a one or two-stage hepatectomy. These patients should have a strong response to chemotherapy ( > 50 % on RECIST criteria) for at least a 3-month period and no or limited extrahepatic disease, to be included. End-points of the analysis were overall and disease-free survival at 3 years. Results: Among 26 patients considered for this strategy, optimal CLS could be achieved in 21 patients after a median interval of 10 months from CLM diagnosis. The median number of lesions was 11 (7 - 26) on initial imaging. Four patients (19%) had synchronous lung metastases. Liver-first strategy was undertaken in 19 patients (90%). Postoperative complications (Grade ≥ III) occured in 5 patients (24%). One patient died within 90-day after operation from intra-abdominal hemorrage while on anticoagulation therapy. After a median follow-up of 25 months from hepatectomy, the 3-year OS rates was 85%. Median survival was not reached at the time of the analysis. Of the 4 (19%) patients with complete pathological response on the liver specimen, 3 developed recurrence. A total of 17 patients (81%) developed recurrence after a median time of 10,5 months from hepatectomy. Among them, repeat hepatectomy could be undertaken in four patients. The survival time to surgical failure (recurrence untreatable with curative intent) was 32% and 16% at 2 and 3 years. At last follow-up, seven patients (33%) are alive and recurrence-free. Conclusions: The promising results of this prospective series suggest that CLS may be worthy in patients with diffuse CLM non curatively treatable by surgery but responding well to chemotherapy. This strategy should however be reserved to hyperselected patients, super responders, eligible for an optimal resection of all the macroscopic residual tumors, and confimed by other expert centers, to be definitively validated.